DIVINELY APPOINTED IMAMS BETRAY THEIR RESPONSIBILITY?

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

The BIGGEST kufr behind the shi`ah claims of the khilaafat being usurped is that they are indirectly suggesting the qadr of Allah can and has been overridden by the creations of Allah, ie. the idea an imaam who is not divinely appointed could have replaced an "imaam" (who never became that imaam because of the alleged usurping) who was allegedly divinely appointed, and so the divine appointment didn't happen and this insinuates that Allah has failed at something He divinely appointed! It is an issue relating to the qadr and their rejection of the qadr of Allah, essentially!

[@Imaddongai]

Also about Al-Badaa’

[@Moe-g2v]

Where is a salafi their is no brain, Allah gave free choice to people to choose after he showed them what's right and wrong, what does Qadr has to do with this, Imamah is a position granted by Allah alone just like prophethood, people are free to follow them or not, that doesn't take from their Imamah or prophethood, think harder next time

[@Unkn0wnguy3132]

You believe all evil is caused by Allah this is your Omari filth this is why I left the jammat, so rn Allah is making Israel kill Palestinians according to omarism 😂😂😂

[@Moe-g2v]

The biggest kufr is your deviant beliefs, you can't even distinguish between Qadr and free will

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

THE TWELVER SHI`AH SAY THE MESSENGER OF ALLAH (sollaa Allahu `alayhi wa-sallam) FAILED TO COMPLETE THE MESSAGE AS ALLAH COMMANDED HIM TO COMPLETE IT, AND THIS ALSO MEANS THEY DENY SOORAT UL-MAA'IDAH WHEREUPON ALLAH SAYS (what means) "THIS DAY, WE HAVE PERFECTED YOUR RELIGION FOR YOU....", THEY ARE SAYING ALLAH LIES (astaghfir Allah): "Haqq ul-Yaqeen" by Allama Majlisi - pages 675 & 676, English translation by Sayyid Athar Husain S. H. Rizvi, published by: Jafari Propagation Centre 94, Asma Manzil, Room no. 10, Bazar Road, Opp. Khoja Masjid, Bandra (W), Mumbai - 400 050. India Mufaddal said: My master, the Almighty Allah says: “...that He might cause it to prevail over all religions...” (Surah 9:33) But the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.s.) was not able to prevail on all religions? Imam Ja’far Sadiq (a.s.) said: O Mufaddal, if the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.s.) had prevailed on all religions, there would not have remained on the earth, any Jew, Majusi, Sabean or Christian; neither these sects would have remained nor any opponent or doubter, polytheist or idol worshipper; worshippers of Laat and Uzza or devotees of Sun, Moon and stars. No fire or idol worshipper. On the contrary, what the Almighty Allah has said is: “...that He might cause it to prevail over all religions...” (Surah Taubah 9:33) He said regard the reappearance of the Mahdi that it will be the time of Rajat and it was in connection with that time that the Almighty Allah said: “And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah...” (Surah Anfal 8:39) Mufaddal said: I testify that your knowledge is derived from the knowledge of Almighty Allah and you possess the kingdom given to you by Allah; you speak with His permission and act according to His commands. After that Imam Ja’far Sadiq (a.s.) said: “Then Mahdi will return to Kufa and the sky would rain golden locusts - just as the Almighty Allah rained them on Prophet Ayyub (a.s.) in Bani Israel - and on his companions treasures of the earth from gold and jewels and ... he would distribute it.

[@Faruk1189]

اَللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ عَلَىٰ سَيِّدِنَا وَمَوْلَانَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَىٰ آلِ سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ بِعَدَدِ رَحْمَةِ اللهِ ❁ Allāhumma ṣalli wa sallim ʿalā Sayyidinā wa Mawlāna Muḥammadin wa ʿalā āli Sayyidinā Muḥammadin bi ʿadadi raḥmati Llāh 1. O Allah, send blessings and peace upon our master and patron Muhammad and upon the family of our master Muhammad by the amount of the mercy of Allah اَللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ عَلَىٰ سَيِّدِنَا وَمَوْلَانَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَىٰ آلِ سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ بِعَدَدِ فَضْلِ اللهِ ❁ Allāhumma ṣalli wa sallim ʿalā Sayyidinā wa Mawlāna Muḥammadin wa ʿalā āli Sayyidinā Muḥammadin bi ʿadadi faḍli Llāh 2. O Allah, send blessings and peace upon our master and patron Muhammad and upon the family of our master Muhammad by the number of the graces of Allah اَللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ عَلَىٰ سَيِّدِنَا وَمَوْلَانَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَىٰ آلِ سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ بِعَدَدِ خَلْقِ اللهِ ❁ Allāhumma ṣalli wa sallim ʿalā Sayyidinā wa Mawlāna Muḥammadin wa ʿalā āli Sayyidinā Muḥammadin bi ʿadadi khalqi Llāh 3. O Allah, send blessings and peace upon our master and patron Muhammad and upon the family of our master Muhammad by the number of the creation of Allah اَللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ عَلَىٰ سَيِّدِنَا وَمَوْلَانَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَىٰ آلِ سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ بِعَدَدِ عِلْمِ اللهِ ❁ Allāhumma ṣalli wa sallim ʿalā Sayyidinā wa Mawlāna Muḥammadin wa ʿalā āli Sayyidinā Muḥammadin bi ʿadadi ʿilmi Llāh 4. O Allah, send blessings and peace upon our master and patron Muhammad and upon the family of our master Muhammad by the amount of the knowledge of Allah اَللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ عَلَىٰ سَيِّدِنَا وَمَوْلَانَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَىٰ آلِ سَيِّدِنَا وَمَوْلَانَا مُحَمَّدٍ بِعَدَدِ كَلِمَاتِ اللهِ❁ Allāhumma ṣalli wa sallim ʿalā Sayyidinā wa Mawlāna Muḥammadin wa ʿalā āli Sayyidinā Muḥammadin bi ʿadadi kalimāti Llāh 5. O Allah, send blessings and peace upon our master and patron Muhammad and upon the family of our master Muhammad by the number of the words of Allah

[@theguvnor51]

Bro just dismantled the religion of the rawafidh in 2o minutes

[@x29b3]

Asalaamulaicum BH, Another great bona-fide resourceful post! Brother if possible can you live stream oct 13th when you debate A. muktar, Please dont hold back on this hyped up kafr. Also stop him from arrogantly nodding so much and saying naam all the time! This guy is worsebthan Raza and his brother that were astray of which i believe one of them has left the rafida cult As always May Allah(swt) keep you and your loved ones blessed Ameen

[@AmmarIqbal-f7x]

AsSalamOAlaikum. Imam Ali (A.S) swore allegiance to AbuBakar Siddique (R.A) after 6 months, and the only complain of Imam Ali (A.S) was that he wasn't consulted at the time of allegiance to AbuBakar (R.A) which was catastrophic in terms that there was a high possibility of Muslims fighting with each other so Abu Bakar (R.A) had no choice but to take allegiance for himself. And the fact that Imam Ali(A.S) swore allegiance to AbuBakar (R.A) after 6 months is a proof that he wasn't forced to do so. This also clears that the Shi'i concept of Imamah was introduced later on wereas Ali (A.S) himself believed that selection of Caliphe by a Shoora was the correct way. Some key points regarding the Sulah of Hasan (A.S) is that Mu'awiya will rule according to the Qur'an and Sunnah, he won't appoint any one after his death, he will stop the cursing of Imam Ali (A.S) after his death. Mu'awiya didn't rule according to the Qur'an and Sunnah , he did appoint Yazid as his successor and deviated from the Sunnah of the rightly guided Caliphs and he didn't stop cursing of Imam Ali (A.S) on the pulpits. He had taken the power to take the revenge of Uthman (R.A) but he didn't. This exposed that he had waged wars on Ali (A.S) only for power and not to take the revenge of Uthman (R.A). I find it quite disturbing that you still defend Mu'awia after knowing what he had done and hide his bad actions. You also mentioned that Al Hussain (A.S) wanted to give allegiance to Yazid which is incorrect. You should've had mentioned what you yourself believe about this matter when mentioning the Shi'i books. Kindly correct me if there is any mistake, Jazak Allah O Khaira.

[@abdullahassaffah]

Everything you said is flawed Al Bayhaqi narrates from Sha’bi: Abu Bakr visited Fatimah and ‘Ali said to her, “It is Abu Bakr seeking permission to see you.” She said to him, “Would you like me to grant him permission?” He replied, “Yes,” and she permitted him to enter. Abu Bakr radiya Llahu ‘anhu entered and spoke to her until she was pleased.Musa ibn ‘Uqbah which was cited earlier has been cited verbatim by the renowned Shia scholar, Ibn Abi al Hadid, in his commentary of Nahj al Balaghah. He writes: قال علي والزبير ما غضبنا إلا في المشورة وإنا لنري أبا بكر أحق الناس بها إنه صاحب الغار وإنا لنعرف سنه… وأمره رسول الله صلي الله عليه وسلم بالصلوة وهو حي. ‘Ali and al Zubair said: “We were only disillusioned because our opinion was not sought. And we assert that Abu Bakr is the most deserving of it; he is the companion of the cave. We concede his seniority in age… And Rasulullah salla Llahu ‘alayhi wa sallam had instructed him to lead the salah during his lifetime.” Sharh Nahj al Balaghah 1/154, discussion regarding Saqifah and the dispute of the people after the death of Rasul Allah salla Llahu ‘alayhi wa sallam.

[@abdullahassaffah]

Hadiths In Praise of Sahabas (ra) In Shia Books: 1. Qumi in his tafsir, “Tafsir Qumi” narrates from Abi Abdullah: “When the prophet (sws) was in the cave, he (sws) said to Abu Bakr (ra), “I see the ship of jaffar in the river with his companions. And likewise i see the ansar. Abubakr (ra) asked can i also see? The prophet (sws) said , “yes”. Abubakr asked how? The prophet did masah with his hands on abubakr’s eyes. Thus, abubakr saw what the prophet saw. Then, the prophet turned to abubakr and said, “You are siddique.” Tafsir Qumi, 1/289 2. Abdul azeem hassani narrates from Ali bin mohammad bin Ali al riza and he narrates from his father and granfather and they narrated from Hassan bin Ali (ra) that the prophet (sws) said: “ Abu bakr is beloved to me to the level of hearing, Umar to the level of sight and Uthman to the level of heart.” Alburhan 565, 4/564 3. Imam Reza (ra) was asked about the prophetic hadith, “My companions are like stars. Whomever you refer to, you’ll be guided.” Imam said, “This hadith is weak, but its meaning is inshallah correct.” Then he was asked about another prophetic hadith, “Leave my companions to myself. Do not annoy them. Do not slander them”. Imam (ra) said, “Its authentic.” Ayon Akhbar al reza lil-Qami 2/87

[@AmmarIqbal-f7x]

@@abdullahassaffah Brother, The first narration gets a bit off topic since it somehow talks about Abu Bakar (R.A) meeting Sayyeda Fatimah (S.A) which is irrelevant to my comment i.e Ali's (R.A) allegiance to Abu Bakar (R.A) & the commentary of Nahjul Balgha also states the same thing which I've said earlier that Ali (R.A) gave pledge of allegiance to Abu Bakar (R.A) after 6 months because his opinion wasn't sought. What I can infer from your comment is that you mistook me as a Shi'a which isn't the case.

[@AmmarIqbal-f7x]

@@abdullahassaffah Shi'i hadith narrations which you cited above isn't binding upon me at all. Secondly, I didn't question the "Rightly Guided Caliphs" in any way, rather my comment was in favor of Abu Bakar (R.A) with regards to the pledge of allegiance which I believe you had overlooked. I was concerned with the actions of Mu'awiya whom I consider a Muslim but as someone who had greatly damaged the system of Prophetic Caliphate upon which Abu Bakar (R.A), Umar (R A), Uthman (R.A) and Ali (R A) had served the Muslim Ummah. I'll cite a few narrations about Mu'awiya: 1) In Sulah Hasan (R.A) it was decided that Mu'awiya will rule according to the Qur'an and Sunnah, he wont appoint any one after him, he'll stop the cursing of Imam Ali (A S) on the pulpits. 2) Mu'awiya didn't rule according to the Qur'an and Sunnah. 3) He had appointed Yazid (L.A) as his successor against conditions of the Sulah, allegedly in the best interests of the Muslim Ummah wereas, great companions like Abdullah bin Umar(R A), Abdullah bin Zubair (R.A), Imam Hussain (A.S) and many more were still alive and more deserving for Caliphate than Yazid (L.A) in every sense. Moreover, had there been no one more fit for the Caliphate than Yazid, even then Mu'awiya had no right to appoint him and this is what Umar (R.A) had said when people started talking about giving pledge of allegiance to someone when Umer (R.A) will pass away. 4) He didn't stop the cursing of Ali (R.A) on the pulpits. 5) He didn't take the revenge of the murder of Uthman (R.A), due to which he had fought battles against Ali (R.A). 6) Caliphate will last for 30 years and then there will be "tyrannical" kingship. 30 years span is from Abu Bakar (R.A) to Ali (R.A) and the 6 months of Hasan (R.A) after which Mu'awiya came. 7) A man from Umayyads will be the first to change my Sunnah . i.e Mu'awiya who change Sunnah by appointing Yazid (L.A).

[@fahadalam8322]

Yaaaa doooin It yaa dooin it yaaaa naughty naughty 😅

[@AsadKhan-uo5yp]

The only good thing netanyahu has done is take out hassan nasrallah, so do us another favor and take out Bashar al assad and khomenei.

[@MohammadAshirIbnSaeed]

Netanyahu and yourself fighting the same fight mashallah

[@AsadKhan-uo5yp]

@@MohammadAshirIbnSaeed Netanyahu is a wicked devil tho but bad guys taking each other out is what I like to see.

[@modular7even]

No matter what happens, not in any way has netenyahu done us any favours, pure evil..

[@Moe-g2v]

Alhmdullah now we know who are the brothers of the Jews who Allah and his prophet warned us about

[@wakemeup38]

Hassan Nasrallah wasn't a good guy, neither are Bashar or Khomeini but they are angels compared to Satanyahu. To celebrate his victory in anything shows your severe short sightedness

[@mahamfatima1177]

How can you defend muaviya who turned caliphate into monarchy? he imposed fasiq like yazeed on ummah, ruined caliphate system of abu bakr, umar, usman, ali (alaihim salam) nd still RA?

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

If you said Yazeed LIED upon his father about what he said on his deathbed then perhaps you would have a dialogue to entertain, but instead you just talk utter trash and fabricate all manner of lies. There are scholars who have entertained the idea Yazeed was evil and misguided, but none who say such things about Mu`aawiyah except fire monkeys!

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

If I was alive during the battle of jamal, I would have been on the side of `Ali simply because he is a MAN and women are NOT supposed to be leading men in any capacity and `Aa'ishah knew this so she was the one who was wrong in that situation and she realised it herself because one of the companions reminded her of a preminition of the prophet (sollaa Allahu `alayhi wa-sallam) when she saw a black dog barking at her furiously on the road and she was reminded "The prophet said you (o `Aa'ishah) will see a black dog barking at you on a road and you are to turn back and go home" and she did. I would have been on the side of Mu`aawiyah regarding the murder of `Uthmaan and I would have been of the side of al-Husayn when he decided to oppose Yazeed. It is NOT about anything except who I believe to be upon the truth, and none of that means I must curse or defame the people whose side I would not have taken in certain matter if it had come to taking sides to show support for the truth and nothing else. Almost every durood I make is "Allahumma solli `alaa Muhammadiw-wa `alaa 'azjwaajihi wa dhurriyatihi wa `alaa 'Ibraheema wa `alaa 'aali 'Ibraheema wa baarik `alaa Muhammadiw-wa `alaa 'azwaajihi wa dhurriyatihi wa `alaa 'Ibraheema wa `alaa 'aali 'Ibraheema 'innaka hameedum-majeed" because I am not an enemy of `Aa'ishah just because I would have stood with `Ali. We believe in the authentic narration "Whoever hates `Ali hates me, and who hates me hates Allah" but we also believe in the authentic narration listing umm ul-mu'mineen `Aa'ishah as one of the only four MOST excellent and pure women EVER born on this earth!

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

Read: وَحَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، وَأَبُو كُرَيْبٍ قَالاَ حَدَّثَنَا وَكِيعٌ، وَحَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ، بْنُ الْمُثَنَّى وَابْنُ بَشَّارٍ قَالاَ حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَعْفَرٍ، جَمِيعًا عَنْ شُعْبَةَ، وَحَدَّثَنَا عُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ، بْنُ مُعَاذٍ الْعَنْبَرِيُّ - وَاللَّفْظُ لَهُ - حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي، حَدَّثَنَا شُعْبَةُ، عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ مُرَّةَ، عَنْ مُرَّةَ، عَنْ أَبِي مُوسَى، قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ "‏ كَمَلَ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ كَثِيرٌ وَلَمْ يَكْمُلْ مِنَ النِّسَاءِ غَيْرُ مَرْيَمَ بِنْتِ عِمْرَانَ وَآسِيَةَ امْرَأَةِ فِرْعَوْنَ وَإِنَّ فَضْلَ عَائِشَةَ عَلَى النِّسَاءِ كَفَضْلِ الثَّرِيدِ عَلَى سَائِرِ الطَّعَامِ ‏" Abu Musa reported Allah's messenger (ﷺ) as saying: There are many persons amongst men who are quite perfect but there are none perfect amongst women except Maryam, daughter of `Imran, Asiya wife of pharaoh, and the excellence of `Aa'ishah as compared to women is that of Tharid over all other foods. (Saheeh Muslim, hadeeth 2,431) Narrated `Ali: I heard the prophet (ﷺ) saying, Maryam, the daughter of `Imran, was the best among the women (of the world of her time) and Khadeejah is the best amongst the women (of her time). حَدَّثَنِي أَحْمَدُ بْنُ أَبِي رَجَاءٍ، حَدَّثَنَا النَّضْرُ، عَنْ هِشَامٍ، قَالَ أَخْبَرَنِي أَبِي قَالَ، سَمِعْتُ عَبْدَ اللَّهِ بْنَ جَعْفَرٍ، قَالَ سَمِعْتُ عَلِيًّا ـ رضى الله عنه ـ يَقُولُ سَمِعْتُ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَقُولُ ‏ "‏ خَيْرُ نِسَائِهَا مَرْيَمُ ابْنَةُ عِمْرَانَ، وَخَيْرُ نِسَائِهَا خَدِيجَةُ ‏"‏‏ (Saheeh al-Bukhaari, hadeeth 3,432) PAY ATTENTION when reading the text of those narrations, `Aa'ishah is the FAVOURITE of two of the four excellent women mentioned!

[@sy6153]

Salam alaikum

[@Lebronibnabdi]

How is imam tabari 6th century

[@BroHajji]

Imam Tabrasi not Tabari

[@Lebronibnabdi]

@@BroHajji oh kk

[@Moe-g2v]

In your dreams Imam Ali gave allegiance to your leaders,go read something instead of following blindly such people

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

Yep, I misspelled "justify"... I couldn't resist slipping the Iranian accent into the text lol

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

I see you ran from the other dialogue you popped up on... did imaam `Ali do hit n runs like that too? NOPE! NOT EVEN! 🍇🫐🍏🍌🍊🍓🌈 SHI`AH 🌈🍓🍊🍌🍏🫐

[@Moe-g2v]

@@abuAbdul-Mumeet Are you on something ?

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

@@Moe-g2v ABSOLUTELY YES, I AM ON SOMETHING REALLY EXCITING AND EXHILLERATING CALLED "THE DEEN", YOU REALLY SHOULD TRY IT.. IT'S AMAZING AL-HAMDU LILLAH!!!!

[@abuAbdul-Mumeet]

@@Moe-g2v Yes, I am on the deen, wal-hamdu lillah, unlike you shi`ah...

[@ParadiseJannah_]

What do you think about Muslims investing their money in Afghanistan (part of khorasan) to make it a country that carries both potential and willingness to fight Isreal? As we know Hadith says armies from khorasan will actually librate Al aqsa. Afghanistan is rich in rare earth metals that can be used to build high tech weapons and they already have a government that idealise Islam (they are just a bit backward mentally and economically). If Muslim intellectuals approach TaIiban and start a campaign of building khorasan for Al aqsa we can achieve our objective. Generous Donations can build a country Isreal is example of that. What do you think?