Hi there! I hope you like the 30-pin SIMM 16MB memory module. Would you be interested to get a set of 2, 4, or even 8 modules? I want to understand what the demand is for such modules. Hit the like button of this comment and reply with how many modules you would be interested in. This is not an order, I just want to know if I should make a few and utilize the memory modules you have seen in this video! Thanks everyone for watching, commenting, and liking! Cheers
@AttilaSVK5 ай бұрын
This is awesome. I could use 8 such modules for my Macintosh SE/30 to max out the memory :) Btw, the Sound Blaster AWE32 also supports 16MB SIMMs, but the usable memory is limited to 28MB due to the 4MB ROM sharing the address space with the RAM.
@MarcoGPUtuber5 ай бұрын
I know how to get chips for these so you don't have to desolder them from DIMMs.
@harvaldi5 ай бұрын
@@AttilaSVK I would love to have 2 for my Sound Blaster AWE32! :D
@philpem5 ай бұрын
I'd be interested in a set of four - I'm curious if my 386 boards can go as far as yours!
@BadManiac5 ай бұрын
I'd absolutely be interested in a set of 4. Being able to switch between FPM and EDO would be invaluable for testing old hardware. Also can I please come visit your scrapyard one day? That place looks like heaven! :)
@Robin965 ай бұрын
The 64 MB RAM count was so funny i watched it several times. I really like the ram counting sound on old computers
@jammi__5 ай бұрын
The counting algorithm was also the same, but CPU performance grew, so on a 286, it'd slowly count up to 1MB with a tick...tick...tick, a fast 486 does its 32MB in a "brrrrrrrrrrp" in a few seconds, and some late Athlon counts 2GB in a brief high-pitched "zeet". I guess if contemporary ones still did the same, it'd just be in the ultrasound spectrum and thus inaudible to mere humans.
@Armand79th5 ай бұрын
I've got 64GB in my main rig and I don't even see a RAM count. 😅
@fridaycaliforniaa2363 ай бұрын
@@Armand79th Maybe you have the fast boot option enabled in your BIOS. It cuts down startup times by a substantial amount, by skipping most of the usual tests you usually have at the start of the computer.
@0xTJ5 ай бұрын
I love how cheap and fast PCB production has made creating custom modules like this, especially for non-standard things like the EDO->FPM adapter.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
It is really easy! And the learning curve to my first PCB wasn't as steep as it might seem.
@n.stephan98485 ай бұрын
8:55 That scrapyard is magnificent, I wish I had a place like that nearby with even a quarter of the stuff portrayed there.
@Spyd775 ай бұрын
I had a 8088 computer for way to long. I was young and had no money, so I saved all the money I got to upgrade my XT. The day I got enough, I bought a motherboard with an Intel 386SX, and 1Mb memory. The motherboard had 4 SIMM slots, and I wanted a single 1Mb module, but on the store they told me that I had to fill at least a bank (2 modules). My options were 4x256Kb, or 2x1Mb. No 512Kb modules. Having waited more than a year to be able to update my computer, I caved and got 4x256Kb, my options to upgrade gone. Then I had a 386sx (I think 25Mhz, don't remember), 1Mb of RAM, an Hercules graphics card, a green-phosphor monitor, a single 5,25" 360Kb floppy disk, and an MFM 20Mb hard disk. It wasn't much, but Windows 3.1 worked well and the CGA software emulation worked SOOOO much better.
@2dfx5 ай бұрын
When you started up that 386 for the first time with 64MB I had a huge smile on my face as I'm sure you did. What a really great achievement and just shows you that "official" and "supported" specifications may be two different things! Thanks for sharing.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I am working on an updated version that hopefully follows the specifications on the datasheet. I do it mostly to learn more. The current modules seem to work well and I got plenty of comments supporting both perspectives. There will be a follow up on this one very soon!
@TheRaker10005 ай бұрын
your PCBWay ads are the only ads on YT that i actually watch. not even just letting the ad roll while i do other stuff, you have me paying attention and engrossed in the product. can we please make all advertising like this? relevant, informative, confident.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Oh well, thank you 😊. I usually get the opposite view about ads in general. But without PCBWay, I wouldn't be able to do all this. Not only do I get access to their services and products, but they also help a lot with their financial support. It wouldn't be feasible without sponsorships to run a channel like this. Thanks for your support! 🙏
@UpLateGeek5 ай бұрын
Congratulations on such a successful project! Now people can finally stop bugging me to make 16MB SIMMs! Of course I'm kidding, I only got a few messages asking about them since I published that project so many years ago. But I'm glad someone finally took up the mantle and did what I never got around to doing. I had every intention of getting back to this project and making my own 16MB modules, at one point even tracking down a source for the requisite chips, but they were very expensive since they were NOS, so I never got around to ordering them. And then my career took the front seat and I've had neither the spare time or energy for such a project since then. But this is an even better design, since it's using chips that are basically scrap. The fact that you can use EDO chips really opens the door to potentially using other chips with a relatively simple modification to the design. So congratulations once again, you've really done some impressive work!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Thank you so much! Without you paving the way, I would have never picked up on PCB design. Your Gerber files and schematics allowed me to learn about those modules. Thank you for your work!
@conundrum20075 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts Someone should make a 64GB DDR4 SODIMM now, purely for the heck of it.
@colinmoller43216 ай бұрын
Oh man, I have to agree, the black PCBs give it a really badass look!
@bitsundbolts6 ай бұрын
It makes those modules look more premium. I'm looking forward to making these in larger quantities 😅
@tomasz89g5 ай бұрын
I was happy with 5MB back in the day. 64MB is INSANE for a 386, nice job, pushing it to double the stated maximum!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I agree - 64MB is not really useful for a 386. Most of the memory is not usable by the software that runs on such a platform. As you said, the driver behind this project was to see what is possible. I learned a lot by going through the documentation and make sense of it. And finally also to understand, why we can only use those high capacity modules in memory bank 0.
@tomasz89g5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts RAMDisk would be very useful. Large smartdrv cache. But back in the day, this kind of system would have fetched a very high price. You are right, RAM was expensive!
@OpenGL4ever5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts 64 MiB might be usable for compiling source code. You could benchmark it with 8, 16, 32 and 64 MiB to see if there is a difference.
@acubley5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts Back in the day I was super happy when I got my P90 system to 8mb. I put 4mb to a ram drive and had the autoexec.bat copy my current game there. 64mb would have been heaven. 😵
@locallemonadestand81305 ай бұрын
The OG Xbox has that much memory gawd damn
@billybbob185 ай бұрын
In 2000, our home PC only had 32MB RAM, 3GB HHD and 300MHZ AMD K6-2 processor (586?). The fact you were able to get twice the ram on a system at least two generations older is impressive.
@zaxmaxlax5 ай бұрын
We had a k6 too, classic. I still have the chip as a memento. I also remember my cousin had a 486 amd I think, the motherboard had the option of 30pin or 72pin, if I'm not mistaken, because I definetly remember those 30pin RAM sticks and I always found them slick and clean compared to the bigger ones.
@philpem5 ай бұрын
Nice work! I never thought I'd see a 386 with 64MB RAM. I always thought they topped out at 16. This absolutely blew my mind!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
386SX systems seem to have this limitation of 16 MBs. Glad to hear that you have seen something new in this video! 🙂
@hatbabe5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts Yeah that's one part of the 'cutdown' part of a low-price 386 alternative to what then got called the 386DX, only a 24-bit address bus was exposed on the 386SX. Internally the CPU could act like it had a full 32 bits of address space but physically impossible to talk directly to more than 16MB. As was invariably the case from SIPP to SIMM to DIMM to SODIMM, machines may be designed to take a bigger stick capacity, but 2x the RAM would cost so much more than double the cost of the smaller sticks. They were at first only for hardcore uses, then as the line aged they became a bit more affordable, and then technology had moved on to another speed/bus/etc arrangement so they never became commodity parts because the next high and mid range systems used the commodity new thing instead.
@TheUAoB5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundboltsThat's to be expected since the 386sx shares the 24bit address bus of the 286. Only "real" 386s have the 32bit address bus
@BeniD825 ай бұрын
Years ago I ordered a number of 128MB 5v EDO DIMMs and the supplier shipped 3.3v modules instead. When I told them about the mistake they told me they'll send the correct replacement and to just keep the 3.3v sticks. Never had any use for them until now it seems. My chips are Micron parts but they appear to be 16Mx4 as well and are sharing the same pinout. Guess I should sacrifice a stick out of my pile to create a slew of 16MB 30pin SIMMs. It's a parity module too so two additional chips for an extra 30pin module... Awesome job!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Oh, wow. I always have to send stuff back 😅. Good for you - I guess you found a use case for those modules now! I wonder what you possibly could have used those EDO modules for otherwise (I guess you have the 168-pin version). I would rather use SD-Ram since it is probably a lot faster.
@MarcoGPUtuber5 ай бұрын
0:36 I found a 16-SIMM board in the scrapyard and a friend gave me another one. Very happy to own these.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
They are no longer that common. I have many and not really any use for them. I prefer larger capacities. However, if you want to build a period correct system, those 1MB modules are probably the sweet spot.
@MarcoGPUtuber5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts I had never even seen one and wasn't aware they existed, I was going to make it one of my retro machines and max it out with what I could find. Once I fix the board though.
@pgtmr27135 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts It's weird to see "period correct." I'd say who cares. But the there's automotive, where original, oem, has the most value. There it makes sense since most can't build better than the manufacturer, and no one wants to buy junk used. I think we had 1mb in our 386 back in 92
@xephorce5 ай бұрын
I love this. saving chips that might have gone unused for the rest of time. this is something that needs to be done more often.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Haha, I am working hard on hopefully more projects like this in the future!
@Arti9m5 ай бұрын
Please note that there have been reports on similar chips dying in 5V systems. On the other hand, I have a few SIMM72 5V modules made with 3.3V-only chips but indended for 5V boards. They don't even have the regulators, just two diodes in series to drop the voltage to 3.5-ish. Also there's another way of making 16M SIMM30 sticks. It involves 8 4x4 chips and a PAL chip for reorganizing the memory. Works kinda like SimmConn. I do have the PCBs drawn and firmware written for PAL but just don't have the time to build it 😢 Great video as usual!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Hey! Good to hear from you again! Thanks for pointing out the issue with the 5v issue. I'm going to research the topic and try to address the issue somehow. I have seen other SIMMs that also just have the voltage regulator and a few capacitors. I'm confused to be honest. But I'm researching level shifters at the moment.
@vitobelflores65105 ай бұрын
Deja tu mujer y tendrás tiempo de sobra. Estos proyectos sí venden si los nostálgicos sabemos que existen.
@themadmallard3 ай бұрын
Great share, it led to a neat video here.
@sebastian197455 ай бұрын
I once got a set (4 pieces) of 4M 30-pin RAM modules. Man, I was so happy, I used them on my 486 with 2x16M FPM 72-pin RAM modules. Win 95 was very happy with that extra memory but, thinking now, it must have been quite slow because of the 30-pin/72 pin mix. However, I had 256k, 512k, 1M, 4M and I have seen 2M 30-pin RAM sticks but 16M is a first. Congratulations!
@argoneum5 ай бұрын
Back in 1990s I had a borrowed Am386DX-40 machine with 4MB of RAM (and without FPU). It run Win3.11 For Workgroups on MS-DOS 6.22. There was Corel 5 and Corel 7 installed. Corel 5 was working fine, Corel 7 had trouble fitting in RAM and was swapping a lot. It was fun seeing Corel Draw 5 actually drawing the business cards when a file was opened.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Oh, I remember Corel. I think I had version 4. That was for Windows 3.1 if I'm not mistaken. It was slow if I remember correctly. Those vector graphics just took some time to be drawn on screen.
@GadgetUK1645 ай бұрын
Fantastic work! One potential problem, having to fit 3.3v regulators for 3.3v RAM, the RAM may have a shorter life as any clamping diodes are driven frequently by 5v logic levels of the chipset. It's also possible the chipset could die when interfacing 3.3v and 5v. It's possible the RAM you are using is 5v tolerant? I see you scoped the address and data levels there, and they look right - but probably because of the clamping. It's worth measuring that same way with 5v RAM fitted - see what levels you get. Don't be put off by this btw - the chances are it will work reliably even if the clamping is an issue. It's just one of these things that I am sure will get pointed out.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
The ram I'm using is not 5V tolerant. In the data sheet it says absolute maximum voltage is 4.75 or something. I am wondering and will do some additional tests before starting a mass order of those PCBs. In case there are 5v signals, would a simple voltage driver be enough?
@GadgetUK1645 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts What you might be able to do - since it says the RAM can go up to 4.75v, try measuring the data and address bus levels with a 5v SIMM, lets say the levels are around 4v - that would mean you could perhaps try and regulate the RAM VCC to 4v ish, and in theory the RAM would work safely as its under its 4.75V limit, and clamping would be (I think) less likely as the logic levels are within the VCC level.
@radionicretrofit5 ай бұрын
I wondered same issue, chip lifespan will be reduced with 5v operation. I am not sure how tight timings on address bus but maybe level shifters are fast enough to use on this modules?
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Would a simple voltage divider do the trick? I might have to get like 40 small resistors on the board if I understand that correctly.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I'll try to understand this more. I already got details regarding level shifters. More things for me to learn and definitely a thing to look at before I order larger quantities of those modules. Thank you for all the great hints!
@jamesrdgrs6 ай бұрын
Another awesome video and another win for making this hobby a little more affordable! Thank you!!!!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Absolutely! It looks like I will have to make quite a few of those modules soon!
@blakecasimir5 ай бұрын
Fantastic work as always.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@Alchemetica5 ай бұрын
I stumbled upon this video, and it brought back a lot of memories. I no longer have my XT, 286, think I might have a 386. Definitely have 486, Pentium, Pentium II and a number of modern computers up to 2023. Just can't bring myself to taking them to a recycle centre. I like your video, an offbeat project , but most interesting. Thanks. Best wishes from Australia.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Thank you! I'm happy to hear that this video brought back a lot of memories!
@LellePrinter825 ай бұрын
Impressive, great work. Impressive what u can salvage from old computer parts. That scrapyard looks like paradise to me, i've would've spent hours there. I have loved electronics since I was a young kid, it started when my dad bought his first pc with a 12mhz 286 cpu. Always been fascinated by computers and stereo equipment. I'm both into retro pc and retro stereo components, and I always will be. In highschool my teachers told me that I knew more about pc's than them, they were fascinated by my electronics/pc knowledge.
@Soso-km8er5 ай бұрын
Epic and inspiring. This could actually be a business for old Samplers where RAM got super expensive. An E-MU E IV is much more fun with 128 MB.
@DocECS695 ай бұрын
A trip down memory lane! 😀
@christophero19695 ай бұрын
Very awesome!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Thank you for your support! 🙏
@KomradeMikhail5 ай бұрын
8:54 "Scrapyard to the rescue." Holy smokes !... Your local scrapyard is so much better than mine. How much to buy the whole lot ?
@loveller5 ай бұрын
Your skills will be in high demand right before Y3k. Keep up the great work.
@Popclone5 ай бұрын
Watching your retro upgrades is like watching NASA upgrade Voyager 1. Keep it up.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Haha, thanks for comparing my upgrades to Voyager 1 😅 - quite an honor! I'll try my best to keep the content interesting
@christianhansen35905 ай бұрын
The audible sighs made me chuckle 😊 But a really cool project!
@Hinoserm5 ай бұрын
Oh hey, I'm the one who makes those Slaton Computers modules you show around 8:45. They're built pretty much the exact same way, but permanently jumpered to EDO -- you can cut a trace and install a resistor if you really want to make them EDO, but I've yet to find anything that can use them that way.
@jefersonfischer5 ай бұрын
Very Cool video!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for your support! Glad to hear that you liked the video and the project!
@mo0seboy5 ай бұрын
I had a 486 DX2-66 machine with a weird motherboard that had 3 72 pin SIMM slots. I ended up populating it with 3x16MB modules for a total of 48MB of capacity. It was a fun machine to put slackware linux on.
@Choralone4225 ай бұрын
Excellent work! It would have been incredible (and expensive!) to have that amount of memory in a 386 system back in those days!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Oh absolutely!
@chrisrudi71625 ай бұрын
The project is very nice 👍 Really great, especially since it is very difficult to get really large modules. I also have a 386DX 40 MHz with 64 MB, but I bought these modules ready-made many years ago.
@viktorgorbunov5 ай бұрын
I've remember how I switched from 1M ( 47$ for student was a good money ) to 4M, it was amazing.
@Ale.K75 ай бұрын
Amazing!! :D That Cyrix FasMath FPU is gorgeous. I also find those COB SIMMs you showed at the start of the video pretty interesting! It's been a long time since I last played with my 386s, but I remember 4MB being the most I could use... So I think i don't have any module larger than 1MB (and there's also the possibility that I achieved said 4 megabytes on a board with 8 sockets and 512KB per module being my maximum!).
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Most of my SIMMs are 1MB modules except for the ones I made myself. I think there must also be a few 256kb ones.
@tezinho815 ай бұрын
I use a SIMM from my very own first 486 pc (1995 iirc) as a keyfob. It's a link to my past that I carry every day.
@christ22905 ай бұрын
Man, you are LEGIT. Great work!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Thank you 👍😊
@br0wnd5 ай бұрын
If I could go back in time and show one video to myself as a teenager, it'd be this one. I know I would have been in complete awe seeing this much ram on a 386!
@adriansdigitalbasement5 ай бұрын
Just awesome! I would love to see if any 386 boards support 128mb on board using 8 of these.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Thank you Adrian. I hope to find a board that supports 128MBs!
@ukmk3supra5 ай бұрын
I'm just constantly in awe of these scrap yards - nothing like this in the UK :(
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Ah, I am really fortunate to have access to one in my area and regulations are almost nonexistent! Paradise for scrap hunters 😊
@Darkstar23425 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts what country is that scrap yard in? I'm guessing central europe somewhere (because some of the modules in your video had German labels on them) but here it's almost impossible to get access to a scrap yard as mere mortal...
@RetroShare25 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts where is that scrapeyard?
@evandrochaves95965 ай бұрын
UAE, not in europe
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I live in the United Arab Emirates. The scrapyard is here. But it's more like independent scrap dealers accumulated in one area.
@bingusbongus98075 ай бұрын
16 MB is so cool, thats why i love the ez80, awesome 24 bit adress space
@ileox41705 ай бұрын
Well Done ❤! I don‘t have any clue about FPM or EDO Memory at all but the explination is on point and the execution as well :D
@stoojinator5 ай бұрын
This is freaking awesome! What an awesome project!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Thank you 😊
@ragenfio5 ай бұрын
This video happens just when these days I'm looking for a laptop to test some EDO RAM in SO-DIMM format... I need the chips, not to be used on a computer, and before desoldering them I'd like to test them to avoid doing unnecessary work... 😅 However, excellent video and excellent work as always, even if I don't follow much the world of retro PCs, your videos are very interesting and continually give excellent "food for thought".
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@Nukle0n5 ай бұрын
My favorite PCB look is black substrate with clear solder mask, so you can see all the copper traces-
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Ohhhh, interesting... PCBWay has that option... Maybe I should try those.
@ChrisR3tro5 ай бұрын
Loved that bit about the meaning of SLC in the Opti chipset model name 😂
@TheCarlos2062 ай бұрын
That was awesome!, ...my first PC was a Unisys PC (ELI4333) 486SX with 8MB of ram & Win3.11...I remember wanted to increase ram, put a Creative Sound Blaster KIT with CD ROM.. all those to run W98!, such times! ...I enjoy your videos THX !
@r4z4m4t4z10 күн бұрын
rewatched! great work, so exciting when it works. definitely a fair trade-off for the annoying longer ram noise.
@bitsundbolts9 күн бұрын
Yes, I'm still working on a revised version. Unfortunately, I depend on help from others. My capabilities are not enough to dive that deep into electronics and timing diagrams of memory. But I hope that there will be a solution in 2025!
@RinoaL5 ай бұрын
I am currently working on a thinkpad 755cs that only has 8mb of RAM and boy does it feel cramped!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Not much room to run applications. I'm sure it would benefit from a memory upgrade!
@hobbified5 ай бұрын
From what I can remember I never actually had a 386 back in the day - I went from a 286 Tandy to a 486DX2-66 with 16MB.
@stultorum_caelum5 ай бұрын
This is a great video. I have an old soyo 486 motherboard. It has 8 30pin simm slots and sis chipset. A long time ago, I saw in the manual that it could be installed up to 128MB, so I knew that. At the time, 16M modules were very expensive and uncommon, so I never had a chance to try them. Recently I was able to get four 16M modules for cheap. So I tried installing these and they didn't work properly. I look forward to seeing you work on 486 motherboards as well.
@lesar235 ай бұрын
What a LEGEND you are.
@rallyscoot5 ай бұрын
saved the world
@Edmilho5 ай бұрын
Excellent work! Congratulations on the video and success to the channel.
@argoneum5 ай бұрын
SoundBlaster AWE32 (and AWE64 IIRC) supported 2x 16M modules, but could only use 24MB of RAM for soundfonts. Back in 1990s this was The Ultimate MIDI Setup. SB-Live! / Audigy soundfonts will work with it too. (yes, yes, didn't forget, there was GUS, and Holy Wars wars between some GUS and AWE users, I know ;)
@OpenGL4ever5 ай бұрын
The SoundBlaster AWE32 was released in 1994. But later soundcards where much better MIDI setups. I had a Terratec EWS64XL in around 1997. This was still in the 90s and the EWS64XL was much better than the earlier SB AWE32 and still an ISA card for best compatibility to DOS games.
@ozzyp975 ай бұрын
@@OpenGL4everIn fairness, with full ram you can get very nice midi quality out of the AWE32, so long as you chosen DOS game will run under Win9x. Depending on the model they can also have real OPL3 FM, which is a nice perk as well.
@r4z4m4t4z5 ай бұрын
nice vid, great work! 30 pin ram, so long ago, my 386 sx 33 struggling to get it going when adding more ram, so fun.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
If I am not mistaken, a 386SX cannot support more than 16MB.
@UXXV5 ай бұрын
This is like voodoo to me! Love it
@zytechnology5 ай бұрын
I used to solder leg onto mine to use them as SIPP modules :) Much fun ! !... people were nicer during that time...
@oldconsolegaming5 ай бұрын
Thanks so much I had a ton of sim modules that where from a different pc that did not physically fit in my 486 pc now I can use them (I believe they where server or smth else) and now I can put them to use without throwing them out!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I'm working on an updated version of the PCBs. They should better support 3.3 volt memory chips.
@retropcscotland46455 ай бұрын
I loved Soyo back in the day. I used those branded boards all the way up to socket 478. They recently started up again in China.
@isaiasprestes5 ай бұрын
Back there in 1992, our brand new AMD 386DX40 had 8Mb RAM. At some point, befere acquire a 486DX2, it was upgraded to 32Mb. Running on 8Mb we not really faced lack of memory. With 32Mb, it was such a paradise of RAM. This 386 was active until early 2000s as our local name server, firewall and NAT running Slackware Linux. One day, it's keyboard was not responsive, and I had already an AMD 5x86 spare on the corner. After more than 10 years of work, our beloved 386 (nick named AMaDo, beloved in Portuguese) retired.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
AMaDo served you well! 32MB is quite a lot for such a platform and probably not that common.
@K10driver5 ай бұрын
When the 386 counted up to 64MB the first time, I had to laugh like you did. Insane idea and great implementation! Another question: I am an earlytime member and from all the videos I have watched I might think you are German. There are some hidden words and things you did that make me think that. Am I wrong?
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Yes, I am German - you are right. Listening to the memory test counting up is just great and I am glad those PCBs worked! Although, after making the 4MB SIMMs, it wasn't as challenging anymore.
@K10driver5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts Dann hab ich doch richtig gehört. Ich glaube es war in einem der P2B Videos wo Du ganz kurz auf deutsch geflucht hast.
@stephenmorrish5 ай бұрын
My 386 was an odd ball. A frankin build if you like. 8MB of RAM, but it was all on the main board! No RAM sticks. The motherboard was huge, an ocean of chips. I can't remember the speed of the CPU, but it did have a maths Coprocessor. When everyone had a 486 I was rocking this beastly 386. Pair of 150MB SCSI HDD's, 3" floppy, 5"1/4 floppy, CD-ROM, SB Sound Card & SVGA video card. A full multimedia PC that was a 386 rather than the more typical 486 for the time.
@petrcvek5 ай бұрын
Be careful when you buy EDO DIMM module. If it has 8K chips it will not work . An 8K chip will have 16M array, but it is not a symmetrical array (which would be 4K x 4K). 8K needs 13 bits of address, which is not defined on an SIMM module, so the highest bit will be floating and the motherboard will only see 4Kx2K array (which many chipsets don't support). Anyway awesome video!
@Bunker2785 ай бұрын
I've seen those oddball modules before. The ones I had were in an IBM RISC server I bought back in 2003. It had almost an entire gigabyte of RAM in it. I have no idea what it was used for.
@e8root5 ай бұрын
It is enough memory to run in to issues with some software/games. Would be nice to have on/off switch on the ram module to turn some of the memory off... or rather to turn these 16mb modules in to 4mb modules. Then again there are sw tricks for that kind of use case. Still these sticks came out great!
@PicaDelphon2 ай бұрын
Well my 386sx had DRAM Chip sockets onboard 2MB + Add on Card 6 MB... My old 385DX Full Size AT Mother Board had the 16 SIMM 30Pin sockets and was 64 MB w/ 4MB SIMM sticks in the unit..
@Robert.Czarnik5 ай бұрын
That's awesome! I have to check my memory connection I have. Maybe I have some of those. If not I'll be interested too.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I hope you'll find some of those chips. Making those modules yourself is just so rewarding!
@Robert.Czarnik5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts unfortunately, I don't have those. I'm interested in 4 modules.
@VVerVVurm5 ай бұрын
My Atari had 1MB of memory and it was a lot! I remember reading in a magazine that althought the CPU was able to address 4GB of memory that this will never happen and extrapolated the power consumption from the 1MB and concluded that 4GB of memory would require about 200 amps during refresh cycle 😆
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Haha, nice! And now we're considering 4GB unusable.
@itstheweirdguy5 ай бұрын
A great video as always! With how much data we can send with our busses on the computers now, it's pretty pathetic how little our computers can do in 2024 taking into consideration we're sending multiple GB/sec even with storage now.
@Stratotank3r5 ай бұрын
Das muss der Hardwarehimmel sein! 386er, die normalerweise 4MB und höchsten 8MB hatten auf 32 und jetzt 64MB zu pushen! Genial. Musste damals meinen 486DLC von 4 auf 8MB aufrüsten und 300DM löhnen. Bin froh, dass ich 4*4MB habe. Bei 486ern dürfte es sicherlich klappen auf 128MB zu kommen. Dazu einen 5X86-133 und Win2000 drauf. Der POD ist zwar besser aber die Boards, die den POD unterstützen, nutzen sicherlich 72pin Module.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Ja, diese großen 30-pin Module werden wohl eine kleinere Nische beglücken. Ich werde da auf jeden Fall noch etwas herum experimentieren.
@bbjunkie5 ай бұрын
With the responses you're getting i'm sure i'm too late! Just getting into retro computing, would love a set of 4 to use, am addicted to building circuits and bodgery like this!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Haha, oh no. Since the PCBs are available to anybody, you're never too late. And I am not selling them now anyway - I just want to see if there is demand for them. The main problem for me would be the logistics to ship modules worldwide due to cost.
@darkfalzx5 ай бұрын
My old Packard Bell 486 started out with 4mb, but by the end of its life had 32mb. Since it was all low-capacity SIMMs, I had to use several of them per slot via expansion boards. This was def more than enough for Windows 95, but then I made the mistake of installing Win98 on it…
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Ohhhh, I remember when I installed windows 95 on my 486. It was such a great experience. I loved it, my PC felt like new. I only used Windows 98 with a Pentium II 350. I never attempted to install it on my AMD 486-DX4-100.
@darkfalzx5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts By the very end I did upgrade it from DX2-66 to DX4-100, but even this didn't make and difference for W98 performance. Should've just downgraded it back to W95. Back then couldn't figure out how to upgrade the video card - would've been fun to see how far I could push it: )
@necro_ware5 ай бұрын
Nice! That is plenty of memory for such a system indeed. However, I would add buffers to those modules. Bringing VCC down to 3.3V is not enough, the datasheet for those dram ICs says, that the voltage on all other pins also has to be in the same range as VCC, between -0.5V and +4.6V. The chipset on the mainboard will drive the data lines with up to 5V and that could potentially damage the memory modules. Unfortunately there is not a lot of space for an additional buffer, but you could save one voltage regulator and may be bring it to the other side to squeeze three chips onto the PCB. Edit: Ah, just scrolled through the comments and there were already same concerns. I guess, looking excited forward for the next even better revision ;)
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I finished revision 2.0 with one level shifter and voltage dividers. I'm not sure if the voltage dividers will be able to do the job on the address lines, but if not, revision 3.0 is in the works. All lines go through buffers and should be able to work within specifications.
@antraxbeta235 ай бұрын
my first PC was a 486dx4 100mhz, had 32MB ram and a 512kB vga card, was happy as a kid, because i could play games :D
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Ahh, nice! My first PC had the same CPU, but I think only 8 MB of ram. I used it also for playing games 😁
@antraxbeta235 ай бұрын
@bitsundbolts i still have the motherboard, cpu, vga card and ram, one of these days I'll need to find a psu to see if they work still
@robertbutjer5 ай бұрын
C'mon man! I had 4MB in my 386sx 33MHz in early nineties.... When i saw new pc my friend bought, with DX40, 8MB, and "COLOR MONITOR", i was stunned!!!! Than i bought Creative Sound Blaster just to mess with him :) We all had PC Speaker for Sound back then, and You can imagine playing Sensible Soccer with PC Speaker :) :) :) When i remember the cost of 8MB of Simm RAM back than, viewing this 16MB modules makes me drool :) If You ever consider selling even 2 those modules, i would be interested :) Just to bragging around with 32MB on my 386 ( i have 3 386s now, with one maxed out with 16MB :) ) Thanks for this video, it was pleasurable :)
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
A 386SX access the memory with 16-bits only if I am not mistaken. So, that requires two modules only to work. I assume your board then has 4 sockets which would be 32MB total - on a 386SX :D! As you said, that definitely would give you bragging rights! Let's see how the response and demand is, but I have a feeling where this is going... I need to set up mass production soon :) Edit: I just came to know that a 386SX seems to be limited to 16MB only :(
@robertbutjer5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts No, SX was my computer in nineties, now i have 3 different DXs. I'm mad about every computer from eighties and nineties (my childhood), and i collect them for last few Years. Primary i collect Commodore and Amiga computers, but also others like Atari, Sinclair, Amstrad/Schneider, consoles from Nintendo and Sega, and PCs from 286 and above. I never worked (as a child) on PCs older than 286, so i'm emotionally connected to those PCs :) Seeing 386 with that amount of memory is funny and extraordinary in the same time. As for the mass production, hahahaha, that would be the bingo!!! There is so much people like myself, who collects same computers like i do, and we both know what would be the demand level :) You just need more people to see this video, like i did, and there You go, You will know what to do. For now, just 825 people saw this video, imagine what will be when few hundred of thousand will see... :) ? I have subscribed now for Your channel, it will show me every new video of Yours :) I will post a link to Vogons and Amibay also, those are the biggest communities for oldies :)
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@robertbutjer5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts If You have time, please look the threads on vogons, there are few guys who knows much more than we do, trying to find what is wrong with this :) But overall, feedback is good :) 9350 views, goood, from 825 12 hours ago :)
@ruben_balea5 ай бұрын
My first computer (386SX-16 from late 1991) came with 1MB in four 256kB SIMMs and that was more than enough when most games only used conventional memory and only a few could use EMS. Later I got some programs that needed Windows 3.1 in 386 enhanced mode to run and I added another four 1 MB SIMMs to end up with 5 MB.
@timc36005 ай бұрын
Nice project. As you already have surface mount soldering capabilities, order the stencil with the PCB. The non-framework ones are cheaper and easier to store. Then use solder paste and an old plastic card to apply. This makes manufacturing of the boards a lot quicker and easier. A gold edge connector would also be a good upgrade as it would reduce the risk of corrosion over time.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
This is the plan! Stencil and solder paste. I wish I could order those modules gold plated. But it's quite pricey.
@timc36005 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts I agree it doesn't work at low numbers, but you can play with the options to find a sweet spot that might work for you. For fun, I just ran a quote with a non-framework stencil (metal sheet without a frame around it), 20mm x 100mm PCB using the edge connector option and choose immersion gold(ENIG), then increase the quantity up to say 50. This came out at £79.90, so $1.60 a card. Changing the quantity to 100 gives $107.60, so $1.07 a board. The equivalent costs without gold edge connectors were 50 off $45.64, 100 off $75.05, so the costs are much lower overall. This could work if you are planning to sell on ready made modules or even blank boards. Note that these all included a cheap shipping cost too The other option is to look at gold plating solutions that can be added once the boards are manufactured. They are either brush on or dipped. There are many on-line. 50ml for £30 was one example I found. I note that some have hazardous chemicals in (cyanide), so be really careful if you go this route. Take a look at the newer fluids that don't have problem.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I would not want to deal with chemicals - as you point out, the gold option may be feasible! I didn't check those options yet, but it may be worth it for some high quality SIMMs. Let's see how this project continues! Thanks for checking the quote btw!
@tony3596 ай бұрын
TAKE MY MONEY! 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰💰
@bitsundbolts6 ай бұрын
😂
@harvaldi5 ай бұрын
Easy Tony, easy... Beath slowly and deeply :)
@wigyori5 ай бұрын
I recall that those large-capacity modules that You used to source the memory chips from, were used mainly in the HP Netserver series. As all such things, they used to cost a fortune back then - so I'm in a bit of an envy that you've found that lot in the scrapyard. :)
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I hope to find more since it seems like those modules are in demand. However, I do find those on classifieds websites too (especially in the US). I have no access to those - I need to rely on my scrapyard
@poofygoof5 ай бұрын
This makes me wonder what kind of memory was in larger x86-based systems like 80386-based Sequent Symmetry and PPro ASCI Red. 64MB on a 386 enables some interesting benchmark comparisons vs contemporaneous systems with MIPS or SPARC CPUs running at the same clock rate.
@ccanaves5 ай бұрын
Amazing video with great insight. What are C1 and C3 for? You left them unpopulated.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Those capacitor pads are for the input voltage to the regulators. You could add some additional capacitors to smoothen the input voltage - I left them because I have a good power supply and don't think it would make a difference.
@dav1dbone5 ай бұрын
A successful and worthwhile project. There were some mainboards from this time that used zipp sockets for memory, do you know of any PCBWay or public domain solutions for an adapter pcb to enable reusing dram from scrap simms to solder onto?
@i386dx5 ай бұрын
64MB of RAM on a 386 is quite amazing, nice job. One remark/question: the memory chips are designed at 3.3V, for which you added a Vreg on the power rail. But the address- and data-lines are still driven by the 5V chipset. No risk in damaging the chips on the longer term?
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I tested the data lines with an oscilloscope and they don't seem to go above 3.4 volts. However, I wasn't able to check the lines that are facing the board (due to limited space). The chips have a rating of up to 4.75 volts as "absolute maximum" - so, there is some margin. Maybe someone with more knowledge than I have will be able to confirm the long term implications if such chips would be exposed to higher voltages (e.g. on a different motherboard/device).
@aspinx5 ай бұрын
That's exactly what I thought. Maybe that particular board uses 3.4V, but some another one could easily send 5V, as it expects 5V module.
@happycube5 ай бұрын
Early PowerMacs and IIRC some workstations used 168-pin 5V FPM DIMMs, so the chips on those would not have any long-term issues on a pre-socket 7 motherboard.
@crayzeape22305 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts 3.4 volts could be clamping diodes in the RAM. Might be worth a check without RAM installed.
@brandonroeder24615 ай бұрын
Neat. I managed to find a 486DX2 66MHz Compaq a while ago and piece together 100MB of RAM for it, maxing it out. I haven't booted it up in quite some time, and I don't know if I have a monitor with a VGA port, or enough converters I can plug end to end. 😅 I inspected it not that long ago and all the caps look ok, and it's been kept dry and clean so it should work. 🤷♂️😂
@michvod5 ай бұрын
If I am not mistaken, those 168-pin EDO RAM modules can be very handy in some old Macintosh systems (like PowerMac 7200, etc.). They will also work in Pentium Pro and Pentium II systems, as those also support EDO RAM (the i440FX only supported EDO, later i440LX added SDRAM support, but it supported only 512MB of SDRAM, but 1GB if you used EDO!, same goes for i440BX). Those modules are really rare as we usually think of EDO RAM as an 72-pin SIMMs and not a SDRAM-styled 168-pin DIMM, but those do exist and are really rare
@pavelmityagin86555 ай бұрын
Fantastic!!!! Amazing!!!! Great job, thank you!!!
@martin-vv9lf5 ай бұрын
I remember when double data rate ram came out, it was a free hack that made all ram obsolete overnight, but required an extensive redesign. I have to wonder if it could be backported to these older systems, maybe ram speed is not that important idk.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I think the timings will be very different and therefore incompatible. I'm not sure if a 386 would benefit a lot if it had access to the speed of DDR memory, but it was a nice thought experiment.
@VladoT5 ай бұрын
You can try using liquid solder for hot-air soldering memory chips. After some practice you can install chips in no-time.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I was going for solder paste, a stencil, and a preheater to hopefully get some nice closeup shots.
@VladoT5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts You can get away without stencil if you get high quality more liquidy solder containing silver (the stencil variety is a paste-like). Just draw a straight line with the syringe across the pads, allign the chips and use hot air. The solder will stick to the pins soldering the chip without bridges.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I might give this a try - another method of doing it.
@darklore75665 ай бұрын
That 386 was like umm i am not sure what to do with all this RAM I can only uses about 1/4 of it 😂 like to see the temps of the multitasking with that 386 lol.
@lantapaukku76295 ай бұрын
I had a 386sx25 back in early 90's. I had an ISA card that had 16 slots for 30 pin memory modules and I salvaged a pile of 256kb modules. It gave +4 MB of total memory in addition of those 2MB already on mainboard. Interesting video though.
@BarsMonster5 ай бұрын
Great job! I think I can finally make myself some - I've got a box of old DIMMs that I can now put to good use :-)
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
I wonder how many of those SD-like modules with EDO memory chips exist. I have never seen them before. Just once, when I visited the scrapyard, I found all those modules and was like 'eh, let's take them. Maybe they will be useful in the future'... And here we go! I hope you can make good use of the PCBs!
@chimebirdplayer33275 ай бұрын
I once had a Soyo motherboard that came with it's own proprietary software (that ran in Windows) which allowed the customization of the Energy Star logo; but as with the software you demonstrated in this video, it wasn't easy to control the colors.
@volkhen05 ай бұрын
Thanks for your effort!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
My pleasure!
@Ajdin875 ай бұрын
Amazing. Thank you for everything you do.
@OpenGL4ever5 ай бұрын
You should now upgrade your Cache if possible for better performance. 128 KiB is a bit little for 64 MiB of RAM. 21:10 I never had a 386, but a 486DX and the most I had in that 486DX was 8 MiB. That's still in the computer. I never needed more for games. Windows 3.1 ran fine with the few applications I used. I probably would have needed more with Windows 95, but I never installed Windows 95 on my 486DX. But your videos have made me think about adding more RAM to my 486.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Ah, always happy if my videos convince someone to tinker with old hardware. And I am planning to increase the cache on this board. I think I read that the chipset supports 256kb.
@awd425 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts at 6:31 it says up to 512kB!
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Hm, I wonder if there are enough address lines routed to those sockets. I haven't looked at that yet, but let's see.
@OpenGL4ever5 ай бұрын
@@awd42 Some chipsets did support more than was implemented on the motherboard.I just took a closer look at the manual myself and according to the "Introduction" chapter and the "Key Features" section on page 4, this motherboard only seems to officially support 128 KiB cache. :( Checking the address lines might be a good thing.
@MarkieMark6925 ай бұрын
Awesome video. I'd be interested in a set of 4. Also thinking if it could be used in an Atari TT. Should be able to max that out at 256MB with 4x64MB modules although I think they need parity.
@bitsundbolts5 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, those modules are limited to 16MB. This is a physical limitation and cannot be overcome.
@LFOSyncToo5 ай бұрын
@@bitsundbolts I was actually asking myself if this would work with other computers/devices of the era...like Atari STE's, Mega STE's and TT, and some Amigas.
@StillTheVoid5 ай бұрын
Related to these 30-pin SIMM memory modules, I am very curious on this Socket 7 Motherboard model by GCT: GCT-8IV. According to The RetroWeb, this motherboard has the ability to utilize 3-4 different types of RAM (the manual debates this) and can run a k6-III and Pentium MMX 200-233 mhz processor. Can you do a video involving this Socket 7 motherboard? On paper, it sounds like a rough diamond but is it? 🤷♂🤷♂
@ruediix5 ай бұрын
Very cool design. If you want to expand further you may be able to hotwire a secondary memory controller into a piggy-back board right on the CPU. This would also allow you to use even faster memory such as SRAM. High density (by late 80s standard) SRAM is now dirt cheap as it is used in some microcontroller use. You can easily get 4MBit modules for relatively cheap.