cannot get enough of Dr. Lyson! more content like this please!
@lanielight6904Ай бұрын
💛
@auroraasleep7 ай бұрын
Every time I see Dr. Lyson my brain screams "that's the dino mummy boy!" so I'm thrilled that these young fellows made such an important find.
@corryavery53397 ай бұрын
Awesome !!!
@SudonSegment7 ай бұрын
That is so cool!
@rngalston7 ай бұрын
exciting!
@IIIIIIIIIIIII-w2n6 ай бұрын
He says this new find can help answer how T. rex grew from a "fluffy, chicken-sized animal into the mega-ton predator that it was 66 mya" When was it determined that young T. rex were fluffy? I know there's been ongoing *speculation* since the 80's or 90's that they had fluffy babies. It's a bit concerning that a scientist is treating that speculation as an established fact.
@lanielight69044 ай бұрын
And such is the evolutionist approach, that has not once been proven, but all assumed. Darwin did a good job on his theory, but it is one of the most Ridiculous theories ever to have hit humanity! Imagine humans evolving from apes, yet apes are still amongst us. Why aren't we like apes? There is No Real Proof of this evolution. There is proof of biodiversity. Similar, but different. As to bio evolution, I wonder, ... was it the evolved, finally upright-standing ape who learned to reason, hypothesize, be logical have emotional self-control... or? - I get it. Perhaps we have one now or even a few within the White House? (sorry.. couldn't resist that one).
@IIIIIIIIIIIII-w2n4 ай бұрын
@@lanielight6904 I don't know why you used my comment as a springboard for your creationist kookery.
@lanielight69044 ай бұрын
@@IIIIIIIIIIIII-w2n Creationist kookery. That is up to you, sir. However, if you research, check out any theropod that has consumed birds said to have evolved post its own existence? Do you have explanations for your "insult" or views when it's obvious you may not have all the facts? I certainly do Not have all the facts. But how can a theropod eat a bird living at the same time (at least evidence points to simultaneous existence), that is said to have arrived much later than the theropod itself? Can you explain this? I'd love to know! Sitting and insulting is not learning, is it? Your insult comes from ignorance. But I am all ears! Please explain the above? How can a theropod have eaten a bird said to have existed later than itself? Since you have the answers, I'd love to hear your clarification and explanation! Thank you :) And save the Insults, and just clearly explain!
@lanielight69044 ай бұрын
@@IIIIIIIIIIIII-w2n Rather than insult, why not explain why you think it isn't possible or please explain how a bird was found inside the stomach of a theropod, said to have existed later than itself? If dinosaurs evolved to birds, how is it possible a bird was found inside a theropod that had ingested that bird coexisting with itself? Oh my! It would really mess up Paleontological studies all based on Darwin, the founder of Evolutionist Theory, who was also experimenting- thus the decision was, "Yeah, we will go on this myth of evolution being it makes sense at the time," and biology can suggest it, but not PROVE it. I love the idea, but it's only realistic to a small degree that I can't explain because I don't have the education or wherewith all to posit a good argument. So Save your insults please. Rather, explain it since all creationists are "kooks" and you have the answers-- I honestly would appreciate it! :). Thank you! Imagine what it would do to Paleontology if each of them learned later that there was no evolution! How befuddling would that be?
@lanielight69044 ай бұрын
@@IIIIIIIIIIIII-w2n Rather than insult, could you explain why and how a theropod ingested a bird said to have existed later than itself? There was a bird found inside the stomach of a theropod. If dinosaurs evolved into birds, how was that possible since that bird existed later than the theropod??!