Wow. A witness that actually answered every question and with few words. I tip my hat to you Ma’am.
@specialkonacid65743 ай бұрын
i was thinking that too o7
@JeffSmith-pl2pj3 ай бұрын
It depends on who is asking the questions. If it is the side that called the witness, The witness is probably going to answer "yes, that's right."
@SaxonC3 ай бұрын
This man cuts to the chase and doesn’t suffer fools gladly! Kennedy is spot on
@cedricg1903 ай бұрын
DONT make us ask you AGAIN!!!
@cedricg1903 ай бұрын
set back , shut-up and do-not ask questions Ps vote Harris
@beefheart673 ай бұрын
Watergate was romper room compared to this corruption
@blipcat33823 ай бұрын
Nixon was actually set up to take the fall for the deep corruption of the democrats, and not one Rino, but all helped in Nixon's removal, hell they even designed the scam.
@JalekNordin-s9n3 ай бұрын
I've been saying that for years, and it's totally correct. This is so deep that it possibly includes every figurehead.
@corywilliamson62383 ай бұрын
@@JalekNordin-s9n The rot runs so deep most people can't imagine. Even Putin made comments that he doesn't listen to the President because Men in black suits tell the Presidents what they can and can't do. Biden, Bush, Clinton, Carter, Obama were never in charge. They were installs for the cabal.
@justiceprevail15523 ай бұрын
The Senate is run by members of the most corrupt political party that has ever existed, and they have been destroying the Country, and our Constitution, as well as attacks on the people they want to Cancel out. Far worse than Watergate, the so-called Jan Insurrection, and not one of them has been tried for what they have done. So don't tell me about corruption, when there has been nothing that can compare to what the Democrats have been doing forr nearly 4 years.
@prryblu3 ай бұрын
Thank You
@steveo38313 ай бұрын
I really like that Professor Jennifer Mascott. She never dodged questions and answered directly without hesitation
@diegojines-us9pc3 ай бұрын
i got a question. if the president is immune. then why does the constitution have impeachments for his crimes?
@pantarkan73 ай бұрын
She's the toughest person in the room, because; with that last name, you know she's been fighting, every other day, since 2nd grade.
@DorthLous3 ай бұрын
I was about to say the same. Someone that doesn't weasel their way out immediately gain so much points against those that don't, even if they display similar positions. Sooner or later, we all have to deal with people we don't agree with, work for, be ruled by, etc. But I'll take someone that's not 2-face about it any day of the week because at least everyone knows where they stand and can respect each other.
@johnking74542 ай бұрын
Too bad she wasn't the Vice President!
@wheelsofafrica3 ай бұрын
What a pleasant, charming, straightforward, intelligent and attractive Lady. Bless you, Professor Jennifer Mascott x
@cedricg1903 ай бұрын
did you need help filling out the correct information while votin?
@paulm7493 ай бұрын
@@cedricg190 ???
@JamesMoore-ic3vz3 ай бұрын
@@cedricg190 did you need help tying your shoes? Oh they're Velcro.... I see now, bless your heart !
@exegetor3 ай бұрын
"are lawyers cheap?" "only those of us who teach law" "...wait I know they're cheap... are they expensive" These two have such good chemistry!
@BUSHY33GRANTHAM3 ай бұрын
@exe, actually it was, "wait I know they're cheap. Are they inexpensive"
@paulholmes6723 ай бұрын
And she seemed to be an example of very good professor and not either syllabus mouthpiece or a ideologue.
@karenharrison8853 ай бұрын
He said 'inexpensive"
@karenharrison8853 ай бұрын
@@paulholmes672 She answered closed questions with closed responses
@Azznbad3 ай бұрын
Yeah that was priceless. Whatever her politics she is the kind of politician that both sides need. Answer the question and if joke is funny then laugh at it. Everything doesnt have to be that serious all the time
@tider773 ай бұрын
My favorite Senator Kennedy quote- "If you're going to be a smartass first you have to be smart....otherwise you're just an ass."
@leslovesliberty17763 ай бұрын
💯🎯
@jaewok5G3 ай бұрын
you should be collecting these in a book
@tider773 ай бұрын
@@jaewok5G I know right. Here's two more. "My momma didn't raise no fool, but if she did it was my brother." "Biden's inflation is a cancer on the American dream." "And the American people have figured it out and that’s why, if you believe the polls, the president is polling right up there with chlamydia."
@RossJames-i6s3 ай бұрын
@@jaewok5G Good idea. it won't cost much to publish being 1/2 a page long.
@charlesbrewer65523 ай бұрын
If only Senator Kennedy was smart!
@mitzieregan57163 ай бұрын
Finally a woman who can answer questions with intelligence. Good for you Mascott.
@mikedavis48513 ай бұрын
She should have Kennedys job she is a lot SMARTER.😊
@cindland3 ай бұрын
Yes, she was amazing!
@billmcghee76803 ай бұрын
@@mikedavis4851sweet dreams.
@jo-annn3323 ай бұрын
@@mikedavis4851nnnoo. 🙄
@petesaria-hf1xh3 ай бұрын
@@mikedavis4851 Says who, YOU? (Smmiirrrk!)
@billyshepley48933 ай бұрын
When it comes to Trump, they throw away the books. This has to be fixed.
@andyman86303 ай бұрын
they throw the books at Trump
@Gina-cx1xh3 ай бұрын
They throw away the books and the laws.
@donjindra3 ай бұрын
If Biden had guts he would test this ridiculous decision and put Trump in an offshore prison for good -- as an "official" act, of course.
@donjindra3 ай бұрын
@@andyman8630 That is a lie. Trump groupies are pathological liars just like their hero.
@garyjackson35313 ай бұрын
@@Gina-cx1xhNo
@bobjustbob42423 ай бұрын
Wow! We need this young lady on the Supreme Court! Professor Mascott is brilliant!
@bobrr75983 ай бұрын
For those in the back, A CLEAR definition of lawfare.
@bobredman78123 ай бұрын
Do you live in Florida?
@billmcghee76803 ай бұрын
@@bobredman7812do you live in Martha's Vineyard?
@davidbrownfield92893 ай бұрын
@@bobredman7812 wtf does this question suggest?
@8Pointbuck3 ай бұрын
Those who think government is good and not force are responsible for inflation and it's intrusion. They can't get enough and the rest of us can't give enough. So who are these social parasites? The host is dying and they won't stop till it does. Is not lawfare a form of government force. If government is not good for everybody it's not good for nobody.
@ShawnHawkins666-333 ай бұрын
Yeah, a word that the right made up to rationalize Donald Trump's crimes.
@observer12423 ай бұрын
“Many people say that it does” with regard to forum shopping! Are you kidding me? We just sat through a trial on Mr. Trump in New York with a judge and a jury and a jurisdiction that was hand selected for bias in order to produce an outcome with the highest probability of being in the prosecution favor.
@kingjamesgorden33 ай бұрын
6% in that district. That’s what DJT won in 2020
@marktwain20533 ай бұрын
On made up charges JUST FOR HIM, even the evil governor said NO ONE ELSE had to be worried.
@mikezappulla40923 ай бұрын
It’s called voir dire
@BSITrace0083 ай бұрын
should have never-ever happened.
@zoneflare23633 ай бұрын
@@observer1242 Bonespurs's own attorneys helped pick the jury
@chrispalo51223 ай бұрын
no one ever accused Dick Turban of being a smart man.
@bills69463 ай бұрын
@@chrispalo5122 Mom and Dad Durbin gave him the right first name and he lives up to it.
@vaughnmeck32193 ай бұрын
Neither has anyone accused you of the same at least Durbin has the balls to be a leader you will never have and a leader you will never be!!
@nukembear23453 ай бұрын
@vaughnmeck3219 first off hrs not a leader he's an employee. His only allegiance is to his party.
@richhauxwell78483 ай бұрын
@@nukembear2345 I disagree, he's just another Dancing Puppet, Dancing for The Puppet Masters
@nukembear23453 ай бұрын
@@richhauxwell7848 agreed that's another way of saying what I said! The money controls the party! The leftist ideology is not the dominion of the democrats but of the billionaire elites who think they have the answers to the world's problems but it always turns into despare and death!
@Try_Gratitude.1233 ай бұрын
A sword cuts both ways...this is a terrible precedent to set.
@rotorheadv83 ай бұрын
Trump did nothing illegal. Cant say the same about Obama and Biden.
@jimmcintosh20873 ай бұрын
Not "cutting" just Yet! Wait for It! Except He'll probably Kick before His "on Paper" (lol)--->>> Presidency
@ChipWinningham3 ай бұрын
Holding people accountable for the extreme acts of putting oneself above the law at every turn is a good thing. If trump had not acted like a mafia dictator then he would have never ended up in this situation. He broke egregious laws, he did every bit of this to himself and had many chances to stop pressing forward with the illegal conduct but chose to continue. Now he has forced the government's hand and they must prosecute. If there are no repercussions for his actions, the next time a president will do whatever he wants, whenever he wants because he will know that they won't do anything, and a lawless president just because, he wants to be is not acceptable.
@rightthinking20873 ай бұрын
Thank you so much Senator Kennedy! LA, you are SO lucky to have this national treasure as a Senator! We, in WA state, have terrible Senators!
@Greggsoldies3 ай бұрын
We have the worst senators in California!!
@justintime417763 ай бұрын
Richland agrees.
@rightthinking20873 ай бұрын
@@Greggsoldies That’s true too. We’ve been plagued in Wa for almost as long as you have! Not sure how to change that. Once they took power, about 40 years ago, they literally legalized every form of election fraud there is here! I don’t know anyone who votes for the current tyrants in power but, they keep “winning”! Go figure! Mail in ballots Jungle primary Ballot harvesting Dominion, ESSS machines with a weighted race feature Automatic voter registration when getting a drivers license…no ID/proof of citizenship necessary “Advocates” can vote for you if you’re homeless, don’t have to have an address to vote. They used the Seattle library for an address, for a while. Forced party registration (so they know where they need to insert ballots) And, the worst…they made it illegal to do a full forensic audit of the elections. We can’t even challenge the corrupt elections! We’re done! It’s disgusting!
@rightthinking20873 ай бұрын
@@Greggsoldies I see they deleted my reply to you! Figures!
@8htiesbaby3 ай бұрын
Thank you. Speaker Johnson is a sausage though
@slstewart3163 ай бұрын
I can imagine it!!!
@connierogers-murray21303 ай бұрын
OH MY GOD, SHE ANSWERES, AND IN ENGLISH, BLOND LADY HAS HER CHIT TOGETHER?
@dennissimo75463 ай бұрын
No word salad in comparison to you know who
@richardripberger29023 ай бұрын
He snuck in "now former President Biden. LOL
@JeffreyStelter-zx8hf3 ай бұрын
@@richardripberger2902I know, it was brilliant!
@JaredDoyle763 ай бұрын
He's speaking within the context of a hypothetical scenario.
@heathermcdougall80233 ай бұрын
Well observed, and very true!
@peterjermey72353 ай бұрын
Biden is the president until Jan 2025
@justintime417763 ай бұрын
Great dig.
@JonAdams-q7i3 ай бұрын
Does The Constitution say anything about a corporation being a "person?"
@JamesMoore-ic3vz3 ай бұрын
Yes. yes it does. Does it say You are? No. Bless your heart !!
@RaifSeverence2 ай бұрын
Legally speaking Yes, corporations can be considered persons. (Or having personhood)
@myguitardetective59612 ай бұрын
@@RaifSeverenceThe definitive answer is no.
@roseymalino98552 ай бұрын
Seems to me, anything that van be taxed and pay those taxes has the same rights as any taxpayer.
@kgoblin50842 ай бұрын
"Does The Constitution say anything about a corporation being a "person?"" No, it does not. HOWEVER - the constitution isn't the totality of law in the United States. It is the HIGHEST LAW, the defines the parameters & boundaries of all other legislation in the country, but it isn't the only law. And other, lower forms of law DO recognize corporations as being "persons". And if you don't like that... well the establishment of a federal legislature, & the process by which they create federal (as opposed to constitutional) law IS in the constitution, as is the powers granted to the States to govern themselves, & thus create state law.
@marina609573 ай бұрын
Great speech! Everything makes sense! This man has wisdom, knowledge and discernment!❤
@DanealLamb3 ай бұрын
Along with class!
@sharondowns36063 ай бұрын
I love him, his cliche's crack me up.
@cedricg1903 ай бұрын
39 cents a LB chicken and a 1.79 a gallon gas .
@rodger24993 ай бұрын
Kennedy should be elevated to a higher position.
@akgypsy543 ай бұрын
Like President 👍😁
@donjindra3 ай бұрын
Like Satan.
@TheBlockerNator3 ай бұрын
Senate majority leader
@bulldog22003 ай бұрын
@@donjindra take your hatred elsewhere
@pleitao53 ай бұрын
i totally agree! He should be the President
@tomterrell17613 ай бұрын
Separation of Powers is a "description" of how the 3 branches of government each have their own, unique function. The Legislative branch, Congress, writes the laws. The Executive branch, the President, enforces the laws. The Judicial branch, the Supreme Court, interprets the law. The idea was that no one person or branch would have complete power. The Constitution doesn't need to say "Separation of Powers" if you have enough brains to figure out that it is what having 3 separate branches with individual powers creates.
@trevg39023 ай бұрын
Yes agreed, and the correct term is “checks and balances” not “separation of powers” 😅
@Lord_Victis3 ай бұрын
@@trevg3902they are used interchangeable. They mean the same thing.
@jenniferbowie27733 ай бұрын
@@trevg3902I think checks and balances is just an informal way of saying it kinda like slag
@jeaniefoust65023 ай бұрын
And Still A magnitude OF LIES, DECEPTION & Not Being Transparent to We The People who have Every Right To Know the Truth!!!
@bornfree31243 ай бұрын
To my understanding, the Executive branch cannot generate Revenue, yet the policy enforcers are a part of the Executive branch and they generate Revenue in violation of the seperation of powers doctrine.
@scpatriot31803 ай бұрын
GOD bless you SEN KENNEDY!!!! We need thousands more of you and your wisdom !❤.
@diegojines-us9pc3 ай бұрын
he didnt ask why a president can get impeached for doing crimes, and not being immune for that.
@Clarence2Worley3 ай бұрын
@@diegojines-us9pcok. What crime?
@garyjackson35313 ай бұрын
@@diegojines-us9pcThe Constitution already provides a remedy for that.
@justme-in2jb3 ай бұрын
Wisdom is being classed as a racist word at this point, blatant idiocy is the new name of the game and we're certainly excelling at it.
@willamschott82353 ай бұрын
Kennedy is word salad, and a Trumper. Worth crap.
@TraciWatson-x6c3 ай бұрын
I really like Kennedy. Flip the script and everyone agrees. Just because it’s not President Trump and they agree. 😢
@peterjermey72353 ай бұрын
The president is commander in chief, but not chief elections officer. President Trump had no right to try to change the election results
@donjindra3 ай бұрын
False.
@cedricg1903 ай бұрын
all that and still nuts left over for the squirrels
@madmerlyn3 ай бұрын
No. His argument was that "imagine" folks charge Biden for an official act. Trump is not being charged for official acts. He's being charged for actions he took that were not within his responsibilities as president. Literally his case in DC is being evaluated for which crimes he committed were valid official acts and which were not. Once the judgment on that is made, he will not be charged for any official acts. Also worth noting, holding a "campaign rally" is not an official act of the president, especially not one in which you instruct your crowd to "fight like hell" and disrupt the certification of votes.
@True2only_13 ай бұрын
I love this man
@Gigithehippie3 ай бұрын
he will tell it like it is and get the truth
@johnm51313 ай бұрын
That was powerful.
@triggerfish66193 ай бұрын
I'm actually stunned the professor answer Senator Kennedy's questions. No. "Thank you for the question senator"...yes and no!? Amazing. 🙏♥️🇺🇸
@karenharrison8853 ай бұрын
Yes, it's not necessary to think you have to bullshit. Those who do are bullshitting and should be viewed as not to be trusted. I would trust this woman's word.
@TrentSLucas3 ай бұрын
“Now former President Biden” lol I love this man
@EdwardButcher-p9f3 ай бұрын
You pay for this or does maga?
@trevaherman49863 ай бұрын
😂😅 yes me to!!!
@TrentSLucas3 ай бұрын
@@EdwardButcher-p9f what do you mean? Who pays for what?
@billmcghee76803 ай бұрын
@@TrentSLucasMAGA (make attorneys great again? Make arrogance great again? Make Asylums Great Again? Make Afghanistan Accessible Again?). Depends on which side (ideology) you come down in, I guess. ???
@TrentSLucas3 ай бұрын
@@billmcghee7680 people on the Left are simply not funny. Your ideology takes away your sense of humor. Nice try though.
@jjones54243 ай бұрын
Way to go Sen. Kennedy, try and teach them something.........ANYTHING!! God knows that some people NEED knowledge!!
@heathermcdougall80233 ай бұрын
I was born in Baltimore, Maryland, and still hold a US passport. My husband Tommy is Irish, and his opinion is that the US Constitution is the most important secular document on Earth. To cast it aside in any way is not just a crime against humanity, it is also to mock God to His face.
@diegojines-us9pc3 ай бұрын
if the constitution say a president can get impeached for a crime. that saying hes not immune. teach that.
@James-gx9gn3 ай бұрын
@@heathermcdougall8023 A document written by man, not of the word of God can be cast aside without offending the almighty. Do not involve Christianity in the business of politics, or the filth of it shall mar those who proclaim to belong to God.
@montamiddleton9318Ай бұрын
@@heathermcdougall8023Had your husband read our constitution?
@francispressly85173 ай бұрын
When you have a situation where the ruling party acknowledges that their candidate is unfit to fulfill the role yet allows him to continue as president-reveals a significant disconnect and raises questions about political motives, governance, and accountability. Here’s an explanation of the logical inconsistencies and potential reasons for this disconnect: 1. Acknowledgment of Unfitness vs. Continued Leadership If a ruling party publicly or privately acknowledges that a president is mentally incapable of fulfilling their duties, but takes no steps to remove or replace them, it suggests a major contradiction in governance. Logically, if the individual cannot perform their role effectively, continuing to allow them to remain in power compromises the functioning of the government and the welfare of the country. The decision to retain such a leader despite concerns may suggest that the party is prioritizing other considerations, such as political optics, party unity, or maintaining control, over the actual well-being and capability of governance. 2. Political Stability vs. Practical Governance One potential reason for this disconnect could be a fear of political instability. Removing a sitting president-even if deemed unfit-could create a leadership vacuum, fuel divisions within the party, or weaken their standing with the public. The ruling party may be trying to avoid the perception of chaos or disarray by keeping the president in office despite reservations about his fitness. In such cases, the party may calculate that the appearance of continuity and stability is worth maintaining, even if the president is incapable. This would be a short-term strategy to preserve power, but it creates long-term governance risks. 3. Power Dynamics and Control Another explanation for this disconnect could be internal power dynamics. If the president is mentally incapable, they may be more susceptible to influence from key party members or advisors. This allows those behind the scenes to wield more control over decision-making without having to deal with the disruption of replacing the leader. The party may be reluctant to lose this control by installing a more capable leader who might be more independent or challenging to manage. Essentially, the continuation of the president’s tenure might reflect a desire to hold onto power through a "figurehead" leader rather than address the unfitness openly. 4. Public Perception and Political Costs The ruling party might be wary of the political fallout from admitting that the sitting president is unfit. Acknowledging mental incapacity could damage public trust, harm their credibility, and offer opportunities for opposition parties to capitalize on the perceived weakness. By allowing the president to continue in office, they can avoid public confrontation over the issue, even if it compromises effective governance. 5. Legal and Constitutional Barriers In some cases, the ruling party may be constrained by legal or constitutional requirements when it comes to removing a sitting president. Even if the party believes the president is mentally unfit, they may face hurdles in initiating a formal process (such as invoking the 25th Amendment in the U.S.) due to political divisions, lack of support, or fear of backlash. This could explain why a party might allow an incapacitated leader to remain in power despite acknowledging their unfitness. Conclusion The disconnect between recognizing a leader’s incapacity and allowing them to remain in power reflects a combination of political strategy, power dynamics, and concerns about stability. While logic would suggest that an unfit leader should be replaced for the good of the country, parties often prioritize maintaining control, avoiding internal conflict, or managing public perception, even if it means allowing ineffective leadership to continue.
@mikew7643 ай бұрын
You’re clearly living in your own little delusional world😂
@mikew7643 ай бұрын
@@francispressly8517 Triggered eh?
@mikew7643 ай бұрын
@@francispressly8517 Swing and a miss lol and very telling
@francispressly85173 ай бұрын
@@mikew764 The only North Americans who say "eh" are Canucks.
@mikew7643 ай бұрын
@@francispressly8517 you’re clearly very confused hahaha
@MrBluegrassfiddler3 ай бұрын
Kennedy is brilliant. He goes right to the truth and reason and he does not tolerate nonsense. Rather, he exposes nonsense.
@Seinfeld193 ай бұрын
Senator Kennedy again proves his worth to the Senate and the country.
@Gina-cx1xh3 ай бұрын
Yes, worthless.
@schizoidman79163 ай бұрын
It is nice to see these hearings and arguments put into the record. But will anything change because of it? I doubt it. The Democrats will continue to weaponize the justice department against anyone who opposes them. I'm sure if there is a way to stop it.
@mikedavis48513 ай бұрын
@@Gina-cx1xhBago! 😂😂😂😂😂
@cg56483 ай бұрын
@@Gina-cx1xhwhy is Biden still President 😂 if he is not for for reelection? 😂😂😂
@handbananaistherapist6423 ай бұрын
@@Gina-cx1xh Yeah kitten, who is running the country right now? If you know, please tell us.
@garrysecuramot3 ай бұрын
Love Senator Kennedy, a very smart man, and a real bulldog in questioning.
@lindaschembri56233 ай бұрын
😂
@trevaherman49863 ай бұрын
Yes he is a bulldog allright!! 😂😅
@RossJames-i6s3 ай бұрын
About as smart a one as well. ""Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.". Now tell me what do you think that means?
@LorenEpperson3 ай бұрын
I'm From Mn And I Wish We Had Senator Like Kennedy (R- Lo) The Ones We Got Don't Take Job Seriously Just Politics Mn Needs To Vote All Democrats Out Get Republicans Back In Power
@josegon47003 ай бұрын
Correctly said: a bull and a dog
@quidproquo39333 ай бұрын
lol… like the executive branch pays any mind to the constitution anymore . Gg folks.
@eddarby4693 ай бұрын
Not with the way one party writes executive orders
@lancewalker60673 ай бұрын
How bout that legislative branch?😂
@kenwheatley17813 ай бұрын
@@lancewalker6067 how about the supreme court?
@bodystomp53023 ай бұрын
@@kenwheatley1781corrupt.
@marksolum17943 ай бұрын
They should ask if the word oversight is in the Constitution.
@TuhljinTampergauge3 ай бұрын
Was that supposed to counter something he or the court said? It doesn't.
@SunTingWong3 ай бұрын
@@TuhljinTampergauge It does!!!! Your opinion is irrelevant to objective reality
@gr8-fun1623 ай бұрын
Congressional oversight does not apply to the Executive due to separation of powers. The only thing congress can do is decide not to fund something. Oversight refers to investigating that money is being spent in the way it was approved. The Judicial branch could decide something is unconstitutional, and therefore, not enforceable. The Executive can decide not to approve a bill by not signing it into law. It's a check and balance system.
@batmanwayne64703 ай бұрын
@gr8-fun162 You neglected Impeachment. That IS congressional oversight of the executive branch.
@garymccray78223 ай бұрын
Oversight, while not enumerated explicitly in the Constitution, it is however implied.
@adamschrader3283 ай бұрын
What all Senator's should aspire to be.
@richardkaiser95093 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 rekwife
@YohielSpeaks3 ай бұрын
I could sit and listen to Sen, John Kennedy all day. What a way he has with words!
@tommycurr87473 ай бұрын
THank you Senator Kennedy fair man the fairest.❤
@alandueck2103 ай бұрын
The fairest racist😅😅😅
@ManyHeavens42Ай бұрын
Every American is Shaking in his Shoes, losing is not a Option !
@dodieanderson39083 ай бұрын
Love this man!!!
@johnietaylor18173 ай бұрын
its all coming out now, truth will always surface sooner or latter, unfortunately the normies are watching tic tok, good luc America, x NZ
@larryross18193 ай бұрын
Kammie is a genius and when it comes to economics ............. Thomas Sowell step aside. This is what Kammie told the fine folks when asked how she would solve the minor inflation problem we have: "In terms of both rightly having the right to have aspirations and dreams and ambitions for your family and working hard and finding that the American Dream is, for this generation & so many recently, far more elusive than it's been, and we need to deal with that." Amazing, and Kammie does everything with JOY in her heart.
@millwork33193 ай бұрын
Nice.
@georgehughes85353 ай бұрын
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
@leegrulke53833 ай бұрын
Scamula had 92% turnover in her office. There is no joy in Dudville, Scam is about to strike out!
@jamesfrangos43963 ай бұрын
AND SHE IS REALLY OUT THERE!! CAN'T BELIEVE ANYTHING THAT SHE SAYS!!
@JB-ie8wk3 ай бұрын
Please answer this: Are we voters that ignorant to believe that HARRIS had no chance to implement her "new policies" during these past 3.7 years. Then why elect her to 4 more years?
@susanverbeek78053 ай бұрын
She was Vice President, there to support the President. Tell me in detail, what exactly Pence did. I'll wait.
@JeffreyStelter-zx8hf3 ай бұрын
@@susanverbeek7805spoken like a true 13%er!😂
@The_Wonders_of_Engineering3 ай бұрын
Bro most harris supporters just want someone who isnt knocking on death's door and who isnt a fascist. Like thats it. You realize republicans had nominated a moderate like John McCain this year, Kamala would literally stand no chance right?
@leonblack26513 ай бұрын
How long are you willing to wait for?
@Az-co4pq3 ай бұрын
Dude, she’s not the President of these so called United States. She’s the Vice President and works at the behest of the President, which means the VP doesn’t have any power to do anything, except be the deciding vote in cases of ties. The VP is a placeholder.
@tanniswalker5103 ай бұрын
Senator John Kennedy, I think you are absolutely awesome! You don’t let them get away with anything and you keep on pushing for the answers to your questions that we all want to know the answers to! I am truly thankful that you are in office and that you are fighting for the constitution of the great United States and trying to keep it honest! So I thank you and may God bless and keep you!
@chipbryan77183 ай бұрын
Sen.. Kennedy is so wise ..😊
@Grant-v9b3 ай бұрын
Not at all
@mikedavis48513 ай бұрын
😂
@phylliswestbury50813 ай бұрын
I love Kennedy. He’s always spot on and speaks to the PEOPLE not over the PEOPLE.
@berrywalton39183 ай бұрын
Separation of church and state meant for the govt to stay out of the church. Not the church to stay out of the govt. One nation under God....remember?????
@andyman86303 ай бұрын
um, i think he said separation of powers - between the legislative, executive and judicial
@Gina-cx1xh3 ай бұрын
Einstein, you're mistaken.
@mikedavis48513 ай бұрын
UNDER GOD NOT THE CHURCH READ THE HISTORY OF SALZBERG AUSTRIA,JIM JONES IT DOS NOT WORK WELL TOGETHER.😊
@zoneflare23633 ай бұрын
@berrywalton3918 the original pledge did not have "under god" and the phrase wasn't added until the 1950s during the red scare.
@hebertentertainment583Ай бұрын
That simple means the two stay out of each others way.
@chuckw.63763 ай бұрын
Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) for POTUS 2028. This is the type of no-nonsense, call it as it is Statesman we need in office. Were he to run with Nick Freitas on his ticket as VP, they should be unstoppable. After 8 years of experience as VP, Nick would be prime for ascension to POTUS giving us 16 years to heal our nation and make it thrive again.
@nathanthompson34013 ай бұрын
Are lawyers cheap? I know they’re cheap. Kennedy is a gem.
@sidneysisk2253 ай бұрын
Kennedy is a vicious and mean.... a demagogue. . .........please think ahead....you are our beloved neighbors and The Dems welcome you...The Dems provided all the social; services you take for granted: 20 hour week. child labor laws. social secuirity, school lunches. rural electricity...a long list......sometimes (but not too often) with elightened Repub. cooperation.
@TennesseeHomesteadUSA3 ай бұрын
Neither does "Separation of church and state"...
@joym34153 ай бұрын
Feeble minds always run from this man of wisdom 😂
@mikedavis48513 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@bobthebuilder95532 ай бұрын
Senator Kennedy is one of the few in our congress I respect.
@vanessapebley13743 ай бұрын
Lets do back ground checks on ALL OF CONGRESS AND THE SENATOR. What will they find?
@hotrodray68023 ай бұрын
BRAVO MR. KENNEDY. BRAVO. 👍👍👍😎🇺🇲
@davidconley62673 ай бұрын
Kennedy is a great man.
@ep35783 ай бұрын
Said nobody ever lmfao
@davidconley62672 ай бұрын
@@ep3578 Well, I guess you are ignorant of intelligence. But good luck to you.
@gustavodelacruz97523 ай бұрын
Brilliant 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@wayne3873 ай бұрын
Mandatory drug testing and term limits ffs!!! This country is a clown show
@ericp64963 ай бұрын
The first is a violation of the 4th ammendment, and the second violates the right of the people to choose their representation. Both would make things worse, not better. Please think more.
@beatorres83953 ай бұрын
Girta love Senator Kennedy 🌹❤️
@galeshawyer20343 ай бұрын
Mascott has been under investigation several times
@GoodEnergy9993 ай бұрын
I Love Your Classy Style Senator Kennedy!!!❤
@leslovesliberty17763 ай бұрын
LOVE Senator Kennedy!! 💯❤️🇺🇲😊
@DD-cd5lr3 ай бұрын
Election INTERFERENCE to the core!!!He Lsp had freedom of to say what ever he wanted!
@goodtoGoNow19563 ай бұрын
Wow, this is an impressive video giving lots to think about
@parepete10893 ай бұрын
At the 2:45 minute mark did I hear him say now former President Biden?
@NoYoureBeautiful3 ай бұрын
Did he just make her giggle?
@Mike-o4z5tThais3 ай бұрын
Astute and savvy discern Hon. Senator Kennedy is. He's been in highlights recent, very busy. Service thanks to him and Prof. Mascott.
@tedthetford64013 ай бұрын
Yes
@kurtisjohnson54563 ай бұрын
Well said sir thank you
@jerusalem75763 ай бұрын
Good questioning, lady is answering questions better than any one I’ve heard by Kennedy. 👍
@FrickinTony3 ай бұрын
Social Security doesn't need immigration Corporations do
@samrizzardo3 ай бұрын
God Bless Mr Kennedy, man i WISH he was 30 years younger and ran for POTUS
@billycarroll7983 ай бұрын
Senator Kennedy is a wise old Owl! I wish we had 100 more just like him!
@roybeach33973 ай бұрын
MR TRUMP. DO SAME TO CLINTONS, OBAMA, BIDEN
@patches32163 ай бұрын
trump has betrayed the constitution and committed crimes against the American people
@sidneysisk2253 ай бұрын
But they are not convicted criminals. They did not commit crimes / fraud etc . They did not steal U.S. Top Secret Documents and store them in a bathhroom. Those documents belong to you and me.......our government.
@az1968233 ай бұрын
Also to whoever is pulling the strings too.
@enscroggs3 ай бұрын
Senator Kennedy... We've had a few Senator Kennedys over the last 65 years. One of them was an absolute slimebucket, but he's dead and gone. But, this Senator Kennedy is a national treasure and a master of the Socratic method. Let's hope he will be the one remembered and emulated by the virtuous.
@joannrinear83883 ай бұрын
I think the appointment of judges, by the parties, individually, poses a problem.
@rayman12303 ай бұрын
I would suggest, Judges whom fail to follow recent case law set out by courts above them also poses a huge problem. Because as a veteran, allowing ideology and policy that inherently goes against the US Constitution, by definition makes it a domestic threat and enemy. Bottom line is, the modern day Democrat party and those supporting it are enemies to the Constitution. Therefore go against anyone who swore an Oath to protect and uphold the Constitution. That’s ALL military, elected officials, and LEOs. We can’t continue to pass law and policy or fight policy that doesn’t jive with the Constitution. That’s the largest threat to the American people. Elected officials not upholding their position and acting with extreme personal interest
@mape76753 ай бұрын
@@rayman1230 but men need tampons…
@JimAkinSr3 ай бұрын
Very smart man and always tells it like it is regardless of who it is.
@wayne3873 ай бұрын
Obummer and Oprah needs to be brought to light
@matadorade3 ай бұрын
Senstor Kennedy is brilliant. I'd love to have a drink with the man.
@4clover2793 ай бұрын
Professor Mascott?…. She sure is 😂
@Littlebigbot3 ай бұрын
And with black eyes to boot.
@gregwindell77023 ай бұрын
Be strong enough to be honest and kind
@carollunsford3553 ай бұрын
Love Senator Kennedy. He is honest and smart.
@beerdeliveryguy3 ай бұрын
he said former president biden. not very smart
@knrdvmmlbkkn3 ай бұрын
@@beerdeliveryguy"he said former (...) not very smart" That was about a hypothetical future scenario in which "former" would be correct!
@mrskenscott96433 ай бұрын
Such a great exchange. These two have excellent chemistry.
@whitebuffalo30233 ай бұрын
Former President Biden???
@ferallass72003 ай бұрын
I caught that as others must have😂😂😂
@sheldonegger38683 ай бұрын
Hypothetical scenario.
@JohnBerry-q1h3 ай бұрын
Economy of language. The senator is semantically posing the future scenario as to what Joe Biden might find himself subjected to, whereupon Joe leaves the Presidency.
@paulholmes6723 ай бұрын
He's more "former" now than he ever was and that is saying something especially as he was only allowed to speak and answer questions when the machine cleared his responses, i.e. "I not supposed to answer any questions or I'll get into trouble". Good ole Joe, you can get an ice cream.
@randyfrost25473 ай бұрын
This lady judge Kennedy is questioning doesn't dodge questions. I bet she's a conservative, honest judge.
@Sdol26003 ай бұрын
Who gets to pick which laws were violated and whether it was justified to do so. Can you see how this sort of behavior will be misused?
@MikeW1653 ай бұрын
The law is the law.
@mikedavis48513 ай бұрын
I can see it now With Trump and his SCOTUS,JUDGE CANNON ,INTERFERING IN STATE ELECTIONS WITH FAKE ELECTORS CORRUPTION.😮
@MikeW1653 ай бұрын
@albundy-m1l No need. We already know this
@MikeW1653 ай бұрын
@albundy-m1l dems aren't the ones trying to subvert the law all the time. Thats your side
@mape76753 ай бұрын
@@MikeW165not really
@KarenKennedy-q1b3 ай бұрын
Excellent from Senator Kennedy!
@apocolypse113 ай бұрын
Politicians are loyal to there parties not the people 13th ammendment 14th ammendment an 17th ammendment was the icing on the cake. States power became obsolete. Why do u think you have state an federal taxes? Lol taxation without representation indeed. 🤣
@juliemorgan49373 ай бұрын
Yep.... Taxation without representation, over taxing the legal American citizens.... We fought that war .....
@rayman12303 ай бұрын
Exactly why federal income tax and welfare programs need cut. Let state figure it out.
@paulholmes6723 ай бұрын
Repeal the 17th amendment, return sanity to the Senate and equal voice to the States.
@d3w4yn33 ай бұрын
She is one of the few humans I've seen testify that was objective and successfully displayed no favoritism toward any political party.
@Big12rocks3 ай бұрын
Senator Kennedy is the best!
@judyfreeman84473 ай бұрын
Very interesting!
@Jumpstart173 ай бұрын
If you were old enough to remember the withdrawal from Vietnam by President Nixon you will see/find that it was no different than tge withdrawal from Afghanistan. The president of both countries left so there was nothing left to do but get out from a lost cause and alot of people died during both withdrawals.
@sidneysisk2253 ай бұрын
Jumpstart: You are a cool head. Thanks.
@mape76753 ай бұрын
Biden/Harris intentionally did it in such a way as to maximize the deaths of civilians and military personnel
@jimblosser34653 ай бұрын
Totally different. America,under the Paris peace accord had already withdrew all combat forces from south Vietnam in 1973. The peace accord,signed by both north and south Vietnam stated basically that north and south Vietnam would be independent of each other much the same as north and south Korea. The evacuation in 1975 was from the American embassy in in south Vietnam after north Vietnam BROKE the Paris peace accord treaty by invading south Vietnam. The invasion happened so rapidly that the NVA were in Saigon within 2-3 day Americans were already leaving and south Vietnamese were flooding the embassy to get out. America got caught by surprise by both the invasion and number of civilians trying to get out. Lives lost were civilians. Nothing at all like Afghanistan!
@LawrenceToney3 ай бұрын
That was johnson not Nixon at the time we pulled out of Vietnam in 1973 under johnson
@davideward3 ай бұрын
@@LawrenceToneyJohnson was not president in 1973.
@JaniceDeFrancesco3 ай бұрын
Go kennedy A man who loves his country Love him God bless you Keep fighting the good fight!
@StephenSquire-g6i3 ай бұрын
BRAVO
@suzegiljer32063 ай бұрын
Mr Kennedy is a modern day Socratis,great stuff
@mikedavis48513 ай бұрын
😂
@sidneysisk2253 ай бұрын
Uh Oh.
@426633 ай бұрын
A veritable Harvey Einstein
@jonhenry82683 ай бұрын
He's a rube
@lcypher55793 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@EbenezerSackey-l9j3 ай бұрын
What a real gem in the senate!
@benjamineferko16573 ай бұрын
The Supreme Court didn't establish anything. They merely recognized the immunity and helped to define it.
@akgypsy543 ай бұрын
👍Exactly
@pilot30163 ай бұрын
Brilliant!
@dk.85083 ай бұрын
Kennedy is excellent here in getting out the truth
@mesfinmebrahtu49463 ай бұрын
Couldn't someone find this Kennedy a somewhat better job. I don't see what the one he has achieves and how valuable it is to those it addresses.
@johnlaudenslager7063 ай бұрын
But there was agreement that a president should and did have immunity regarding core functions. So whether ex-president Trump has immunity depends on whether the function(s ) in question is/are core. So what was Senator Kennedy's point?