Do you really understand Einstein’s theory of relativity? - BBC News

Almost everyone has heard of Albert Einstein, the Nobel prize-winning genius whose theories overturned centuries of scientific thought. But how much do you understand the work that made him really famous - his theory of general relativity?
Here, we talk you through the science that changed the way we understand the universe.
Video production: Kako Abraham and Camilla Costa
Editor: Carol Olona
Voice: Claire Press
Please subscribe HERE bit.ly/1rbfUog

[@TCBumby]

Of course I do.

[@adityachoksi8446]

Yeah.. I always knew u were not as dumb as u looked..

[@garyhayes5751]

@@adityachoksi8446 But I know you are always a dumb duchè.

[@ibrahimcamir4245]

Haha lOl

[@laszlogmeszaros5743]

No, you don't.

[@swapanzameen6302]

Nein, Nein, Nein, Nein, Nein

[@Riiisuu]

Please never let a journalist explain relativity

[@sauceaddict9569]

FACTS🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾👏🏿👏🏿💯💯.

[@palrajib73]

Confused

[@unknownnepali772]

😂😂😂

[@gerry9292]

Why not

[@Riiisuu]

Gerry Lazuardi relatively is heavily mathematical, your average person wouldn’t even know what they’re looking at if they were faced with the real relativity, it is not nice to deal with. The stuff explained in the videos are consequences of relativity, not relativity itself.

[@hopscotch30]

No, this is NOT the theory of relativity - it is merely one of the IMPLICATIONS of the theory of relativity.

[@troll-ck1wo]

Can you please explain it, I don't really get it

[@michaelgirgis9019]

ARG One of the fundamental ways that this theory changed physics was that it posited that the passage of time was relative based on several factors that include speed and gravity. Even more mind-boggling, time stands still at the speed of light as if there’s a cosmic “speed-limit” imposed on our universe. Gravitational fields are only one part of this theory.

[@troll-ck1wo]

@@michaelgirgis9019 thank you

[@michaelgirgis9019]

ARG There’s this excellent documentary that breaks all of it down if you have the time: Edit: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fHmogaGHmdGgiNU (I had linked the wrong documentary originally, my bad)

[@britishhumour2858]

hopscotch30 It’s actually very simple, my physics teacher taught me this when i was 14. Matter is made of energy. Energy makes matter. That is the simplest way to describe E=MC2 Once you understand that then physics becomes a game of energy and mass.

[@ivarbaratheon264]

Well I definitely understand it better than the BBC does

[@sm7085]

You want a cookie?

[@bassimkiani5504]

@@sm7085 😂😂😂

[@ivarbaratheon264]

@@sm7085 double chocolate

[@qaskas]

Why did you click on the video then? Just to gloat?

[@lmao.3661]

lmao people acting like hes bragging his intelligence but its the BBCs fault for being retarded.

[@bristowxavierlm]

you should change the title to : gravitational law debunked by theory of relativity...

[@shubhamtoshniwal6722]

Dear team, please provide subtitle as we know that a very few subscribers are deaf/hard-of-hearing. I know it will be a heavy task to satisfy their need, but they will appreciate you that "YOU REALLY CARE FOR THEM". It is my purposeful request to you to add subtitle to every new video you make! I hope you will fulfill it!

[@TungKhwoChi]

Also for people whose English is not good enough, like moi. Phew

[@selihter]

Great idea for i am a foreigner that can speak english well and still unable to understand spoken English words sometimes.

[@rickcook2344]

@@TungKhwoChi English is called English for a reason. Just call it what it is. It's one of the few languages I speak but I'm lazy, so....

[@emoquent9447]

What? I'm dyslexic a

[@shubhamtoshniwal6722]

@@selihter I am happy that I am helping that!😊

[@extensionsorbit7727]

"Shed light on...black holes"

[@Bluxxa]

@surgical analysis be quiet racist

[@charlese665]

My wife has a black hole in which I’m still try to reach till this day.. still a mystery to me

[@happyhaze1526]

Which makes sense. Shed light into black holes, that makes no sense.

[@swapanzameen6302]

@@charlese665 Please try an aphrodiasc

[@AddyOnGuitar]

Lol

[@joshuarivera1322]

In simple language, Gravity is not a force but an effect cause by the curvature of spacetime.

[@turkicunion1996]

Schools:: there are four forces gravity,magnetism,upthrust and air resistance

[@danhas_]

gravity is still a force but as you might know there are four different types of mechanics and they all apply to different body sizes and speed. Newtonian mechanics work well with large mass and low speed whilst relativistic mechanics which is “Einsteinian” would work well for large mass with speed close to the speed of light, fast moving bodies. All theories work as lo g as they are applied to the correct situation.

[@dbjkatz]

​@@turkicunion1996you left out the strong force and the weak force.

[@inscrutablemungus4143]

While I appreciate what the BBC's trying to do here, anybody seeing this video doesn't know any more about general relativity than they started out. The 'spacetime is a fabric' explanation has been offered by popsci/documentaries for decades now and more or less everybody knows it. The problem is that that's not quite what the physics predicts. I suppose the fabric idea is a decent analogy, but it's fundamentally different to how things work. It's not that objects follow a curved path, a straight line -- or geodesic -- for a body near a massive object *is* curved. Think of it this way: Suppose the Earth was blind and sentient and you asked it how its moving. It's response would be that it's falling down in a straight line, and it is! It just so happens that the straight line traces an elliptical orbit. That was a not very great explanation of the equivalence principle, one of foundational insights that Einstein used to formulate his theory. However, to understand this subject with any level of rigor, you really need a lot of background math/physics with maybe a crash course in differential geometry, a few homework sets crunching through the nuances of lorentz boosts, perhaps derive through contractions of the Riemann tensor and otherwise wade through some fairly advanced (but beautiful) math. It's not an accident that most physicists (at least in the US) don't encounter general relativity till grad school. I was a brave (and stupid) undergrad and decided to give it a shot in my senior year after I did special relativity as part of my electromagnetics class. I ended up doing okay, but I can't honestly say I understood much from just those lectures/HWs/exams. It really took me more graduate coursework and doing research on computational cosmology for my thesis to get better at it. And I've still only barely scratched the surface. That last bit is probably true of any academic discipline.

[@mansamusa8191]

fantastic comment

[@alifjkabir]

Thanks for the explanation

[@inscrutablemungus4143]

@@syedhamza4196 If you're asking me, I'm an agnostic atheist.

[@inscrutablemungus4143]

@@maxc9334 As someone who's taught graduate level physics classes, my conscience is perfectly clear on the teaching others front.

[@inscrutablemungus4143]

@@maxc9334 Ah, classic goalpost shifting. Yes, a couple of my former students have won best paper awards at various APS/IEEE conferences. Let me guess, you're going to ask me next if I have a student who has won a distinguished fellowship or something similar to the Nobel prize? Let's cut to the chase. Suppose my answer was 'no' to any of your questions so far, what's your follow-up? What point are you trying to make?

[@rishavsinha3376]

Hit like so people go to PBS spacetime to understand about general relativity

[@canyadigit6274]

Yessss! That is where I learned it.

[@SuperStevestan]

BBC, do you really understand the theory of relativity?

[@jessstuart7495]

I tried, but got lost in the math (differential geometry and metric tensors). Maybe someday I'll get back to it.

[@sagittarius5466]

@@jessstuart7495 who are you and what did you do to BBC?! >:(

[@Ashish-pu6vr]

This is like every other relativity video on KZbin ever.

[@ruffeyx]

""nothing could travel faster than light, NOT EVEN gravity" 😂 this is something new to hear. its usually the other way round. nothing could escape blackhole gravity, NOT EVEN light" clever

[@ddd-ly3rv]

It's amazing that someone could conceive in their mind such a thing. Hints at the fact that fundamentally we are all flawed characters, it becomes how we see the world. Like how the wicked witch in the wizard of Oz wasn't actually wicked, she was merely mis understood.

[@NaniNani-bw9kw]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j6G6ZKSuetifZ7M kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZCtlJShd9WijaM

[@AmyAmy-er8bp]

Most physicist are misunderstood, ever had a conversation with politicians. Don't throw me into psychiatric hospital. Think about spacecraft or space in general and dark matter. I understand abstraction I am just not that smart. Abstractionists. Ever weighed yourself in the elevator? Someone might think it's really weird.

[@qaphelaminenhle5560]

I don't think he used his mind that much. He most likely got these ideas by fully tuning into the state of consciousness/awareness.

[@ajredguy]

The editing was EVERYTHING! Informative & aesthetically pleasing 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

[@cantrelate2757]

Daniel Michael what the fuck

[@samuelmcdonagh1590]

Daniel Michael people are so intimidated by knowledge, clicking on a three minute video to “deepen [your] idea of relativity” just goes to show that it’s a fairly shallow understanding. Clearly you have no scientific background, it’s easy to criticise a video when you know nothing and pretend to know something, but I’m sure any true physicist would appreciate the video for what it is. You’re just a hotheaded prick, I’m sure you’re well versed in quantum mechanics as well, from the videos you’ve watched about it. Simply listening to analogies about it. Solve a spherically symmetric potential of the schrodinger equations, and maybe you understand. If you can’t grasp the maths of a theory, you don’t understand the theory. It’s as simple as that.

[@NaniNani-bw9kw]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/janYeXWKerhlY9U

[@hadoukenpait7572]

The last 1min gave me goosebumps

[@user-nn4dv6di7o]

The theory of relativity is a theoretical preparation for passing through time and space, because space and time is a net, and mass can make it distorted. If a mass object, such as a black hole, causes time and space to collapse into the area, it directly reaches the other, the singularity. It is the export.

[@monalijoshi1768]

Nobody can explain it better than einstein himself.

[@acamiln8354]

You ask person who tuned mathematic equitation in order to support that space does not expand(it was believing in that times) to explain to you anything? Einstein was not honest, second one Einstein was not so smart, third one, Einstein is made so popular by media.

[@herrimangara8431]

@@acamiln8354 stfu, u just an imbecille who lives under stupid shell. u know nothing.

[@you7493]

@@acamiln8354 yes yes yes! Its media hype. That guy is not a real genius but a real plagiarist. Newton theory are more sense than this bending space drama relativity.

[@GuiDuckz]

@@you7493 lmao bros challenging albert einstein himself. you do realise his theories, including this one, have all been scientifically proven right?

[@okwatever3582]

@@you7493prove it. With paper and research. Not just mere words and accusations.

[@Hon_Ngure]

heyyyu BBC we need subtitles man... im partialy deaf i cant even hear

[@piggypiggypig1746]

There was no sound accompanying this video.

[@cooliipie]

Turn up the sound

[@piggypiggypig1746]

@@cooliipie Pump up the volume K

[@Hon_Ngure]

@@cooliipie if you dont get science then i cant answer whatever you just said

[@brianxyz]

Click on the "CC" button.

[@davidpalin1790]

Relatively describes how we interact with the world around us, it needs to be taught to students and understood

[@mariadaluzmoutinho5701]

Que elucidativo e de simples explicação!! Einstein lançou novas luzes sobre a natureza do espaço, do tempo e da matéria! Um cientista que nunca passa de tempo!!

[@NaniNani-bw9kw]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j6G6ZKSuetifZ7M

[@MarkRyanNZ]

Did someone hire a hollywood trailer editor for this video ?

[@jitendra-ke5lb]

It's BBC man .

[@jameshughes131]

Flat earthers come out so hollywood had to step up their propaganda. I love flat earthers.

[@abhishekuniyal5045]

The Newton theory also depends on the distance between the two bodies it is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. (in the video they stated it doesn't.)

[@flyingkeyframes]

The NEWS part of the logo on this video is in the Reith font instead of Gill. This is very exciting to me.

[@MyEyesBled]

Sure, it theorizes that everything politicians say or promise is relative.

[@DippinSauc]

Such is the quality of contents. So much grateful to BBC and its entire team.

[@heysupermanlook996]

If I were to write such a comment I would be doing it sarcastically.

[@Dearon_]

Ratio

[@jacquespoitier9924]

Dayum, stunning visuals there.

[@navneethsuresh9966]

The explanation I was looking for thank you so much

[@Dearon_]

Ratio

[@jazz455]

@@Dearon_ embarrassing

[@gavinbissell8847]

The BBC didn't even understand journalism

[@WeAreOneWeAreMany]

This is a better explanation of general relativity...... imagine you're in space with a very powerful telescope looking at a clock a few meters away, it says 12oclock and you begin to travel backwards away from the clock at the speed of light. you would always see 12oclock

[@lovelysingh924]

Please make video on theory of relativity in detail

[@radhakrishna1845]

Sir Arthur Eddington....... Great man..... BBC should make videos on his work.....

[@manav4239]

Wish he could live 200 years. Although that's impossible but if he would then we may would have got a few more wonderful theories. My idol, my favorite scientist. Not only Einstein but Newton was also as great as him because whatever Einstein did was on the basis of Newton's laws only. If there were no laws of Newton, then I don't think it was possible for Einstein to do this work. Anyway, both are legends. We need more men like them.

[@NaniNani-bw9kw]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/j6G6ZKSuetifZ7M

[@tanaynasikkar2410]

I think I don't understand relativity, so this question might sound naive... but in the video, Earth is shown following the curvature caused by the sun. How would you represent other celestial bodies orbiting the sun with the same curvature?

[@fagnerichigo1]

I loved so much this video. Thank you very much!

[@ExcellentLeoSilinda]

I love the sound effects

[@nettyvoyager6336]

yes i do the but the quote he made is true "time and space are not absolute " this is still open to debate :P

[@Paine137]

It isn't open to debate; it's established. Place an atomic clock on a plane, fly it for a couple hours, and then compare it with an atomic clock on Earth: and a measurable discrepancy arises. That alone busts absolutism to bits.

[@happyhaze1526]

@Thomas Headley Actually, if you look up any ass you'll find shit, even your ass, so why single out the pig here? I don't get it.

[@KnickNbock]

Great visuals, great sound...but what???

[@Alikk784]

the editing is super satisfying

[@Dynioglowy1986]

I know about one think what he said ..... The release of atomic power has changed everything except our way of thinking ... the solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind .If only I had know, I should have become a watchmaker. 1945 Albert Einstein

[@mirwaiz9619]

At last a video with good editing from BBC

[@yuthebaguette]

No, how are the planets moving faster than the gravitational waves?...

[@mirwaiz9619]

@@yuthebaguette i didn't said it's precise, it's just satisfying.

[@Sid-cf2ni]

"Nothing can travel faster than light ,not even *GRAVITY* " since when did gravity start traveling wtf

[@ajayp5835]

Can u imagin time as a dimention?? Actully it is.. Something is beyond imagination just undestand and try to study more about gravity

[@pythondrink]

@@ajayp5835 actually gravity does. Its effects on space which in turn affects other objects travel through space like ripples.

[@tirulogachandark6370]

@@ajayp5835 can u explain elaborately, one more time....

[@tirulogachandark6370]

@@ajayp5835 i understand one'thing between Newton & Einstein that Newton's theory tell us simply abound and planets are set free, but Einstein tell us that it will make an gravitational wave and planet will follow up the wave, but where did it end up....

[@dvans5435]

@@tirulogachandark6370 It means that if the sun disappears sunddenly right now, we will orbit it the same way till 8 min after the disappearing of the sun. Then the planets will move in the random orbits unbounded by sun's gravity.

[@AJ-lb3ye]

This gave me goosebumps at the end

[@simonfetwi]

the buildup was awesome

[@bettyblue1742]

This score is brilliant. The animation and editing are amazing. The script is punchy and consice. The narrators voice is perfectly tempered and metered. I am very impressed.

[@sealion1214]

Wow wow wow, am I seeing something traveling faster than the speed of light at 2:50?

[@Hamburger-vg7vt]

Hey what d you see?

[@torav.]

if you think u can explain relativity in 3 mins u dont really understand Einstein’s theory of relativity !

[@Paine137]

If you can't explain something simply, you don't understand it.

[@roninr8199]

But teaching something complex in more easy was so that everyone can understand is the real ART. It doesn't mean they don't know.

[@humanoid2423]

It's fascinating just how he came up with that thought.

[@NaniNani-bw9kw]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/pYuQf2iDf82ciMU

[@nsh1772]

Not really I am sure Einstein worked really hard for severally years to come up with the general theory of relativity

[@jrome_20]

More videos like this please

[@prabhakb3294]

At 3.05 Mercury is traveling faster than light 😁

[@Thomashorsman]

Are you trying to tell me to revise for my A Level Physics paper 3 on Monday? Because it contains this topic.

[@faznaz7455]

A level teaches general relativity? Haha i remember doing special relativity, general relativity is 2nd year uni level.

[@Thomashorsman]

Faz Naz123 everything has moved down 😭, even GCSEs are taught A Level content

[@faznaz7455]

@@Thomashorsman I remember the jump from GCSE to A level being very big, they tried to reduce that gap. A level is mostly fine except some of special relativity and electromagnetism especially induction because you don't learn some of the concepts properly until you get to uni level.

[@Thomashorsman]

Faz Naz123 the thing is I was the first year group to take the new 9-1 GCSE in 2017, but they only introduced it for English and maths. The next year they introduced it to most subjects, That year they also started new A levels but kept the letter grades. What we have to learn actually crosses over with the new GCSE stuff that we never learnt as we did the old GCSE science. So year 10s are learning the same stuff we learn in year 13

[@faznaz7455]

@@Thomashorsman Year 13 stuff taught in year 10? Knowing what my brother studies for his GCSES i have mever seen such thing. They will never make you learn the concepts to a great deoth unless it is just basic facts. As said before they need to bridge the gap somehow. I noticed a lot of first year A level topics were brought down however. You should feel lucky because 20 years ago Physics had calculus involved.

[@silversilv451]

Time is an event due to kinetic change Time does not change, time is constant, the kinetic event is the one that changes over the fixed time and makes a visible change or a perceptible change in itself

[@surajpatil8670]

What a well explained video

[@HabsGeorge]

How do we know gravity travels at the speed of light? What about entanglement?

[@ytsas45488]

Entanglement involves no communication between particles - it is merely that the particles are united under one wavefunction. You cannot use entanglement to transmit information faster than light. Furthermore, we know gravity travels at the speed of light because we've already observed gravitational waves arriving at the same time as visual observations in recent experiments.

[@HabsGeorge]

@@ytsas45488 They say entanglement is instanteous. Can affect particles across the universes.

[@ytsas45488]

@@HabsGeorge No one says that. First of all, entanglement doesn't affect anything because it is merely a property. Second, simultaneity is relative so that statement doesn't make any sense to begin with.

[@achyuththouta6957]

@@ytsas45488 Entanglement is false. No form of communication can be faster than light. You can't know what is there beyond the speed of light. Something fundamental about quantum mechanics has to change to unite relativity and quantum mechanics.

[@achyuththouta6957]

@@ytsas45488 Also speed of light is actually speed of causality first. Light just happens to move at that speed. There's no way we can know something beyond the speed of causality as it's the fastest way of communicating.

[@nktthegreat]

PBS did a better job but then it also took them 4 videos of 20-30 minutes duration to explain. Personally, General Relativity is still explainable. Quantum Mechanics is where one start pulling one's hair.

[@aleksandersuur9475]

Much of quantum mechanics is very hard to near impossible to give intuitive explanations to, there simply is no good macro world analogue to how reality really works on most fundamental levels, there is no convenient trampoline. People try anyway, but all it really leads to is bunch of poor analogues that are more misleading than explaining. You have to do it the hard way, you have to learn the math. And that's the part that makes you pull your hair out.

[@ToddyBeer69]

Goosebumps at the climax😄

[@Greenpoloboy3]

Simply, It's all to do with "E". When taking away G from E, your left with Q. Times it by 2 gives you K, which if squared gives you M. And because you have a remaining two C's you have your result. So E does indeed equal M and C squared

[@mark63424able]

That's part of Einstein's theory of Special Relativity not General Relativity. And what you've typed made no sense.

[@Greenpoloboy3]

@@mark63424able Ah yes, I misread thte title thank you

[@theodore6548]

@@mark63424able I think he's pulling your leg.

[@bhuvaneshs.k638]

Understanding this theory was revelation of my life !! Simple yet elegant!!!!!

[@oglthecaptain]

How did you understand it?? I am having a difficult time understanding it

[@theperson4684]

Yes, yes I do

[@nivas796]

More concern on Sun disappearances @00:45 @02:42, what a wonderful way to explain GR !?

[@AmyAmy-er8bp]

The main point of his light quantum theory is the idea that light's energy is related to its oscillation frequency.

[@arunm.g.8136]

The presentation is fantastic!

[@tanyahall6153]

It’s not talking much about him they are talking about space🙁🙁🙁

[@hellstormangel]

That was a subpar presentation of Relativity and a vast miscorrect representation on why Einstein started thinking about relativity, which was based on the notion of time. Newton was convinced that time was Absolute in all frames of reference and Einstein thought that was a ridiculous statement and derived special relativity, his research into how acceleration worked and applying his theory of special relativity led to the famous discussion of how spacetime curvature represents the force that we call gravity.

[@jothirvinayakm9089]

Pretty neat grafics

[@ianmoone2359]

Theory of relativity? Yup, neva loan munney to relatives! 😜😜😂

[@RanggaRamadya]

Ian Moone just thinking before you can talk and prove something to

[@rajab4187]

Turn off background music for God sake

[@kurtsgirl8376]

The toon blast ad before this made a lot of sense

[@AKeNeN]

It relieves me that I no longer have to maintain this charade.

[@thewolverine1913]

I understand relativity more than I do some of my relatives..

[@ytsas45488]

Oh, yes - definitely ignore Minkowski's work and credit it all to Einstein.

[@jagniyantlunagariya3922]

I have a question, What causes the dip in the space-time fabric? Mass?? How?

[@AMC2283]

It would seem to be the nature of space time fabric to curve from mass to produce gravity

[@BurnedLeo]

Nothing new, I already knew it. But I loved the graphics.

[@dogehohoho]

Another quality content. Bravo BBC.

[@Dearon_]

Ratio

[@onlygearwarrior]

And was a man not searching for attention. So all we've had ever since is a bunch of people who's mothers told them they were brilliant. And they've spent their lives trying to convince the world of their egos. And really haven't come up with anything. While all this time, people much more like Einstein have tirelessly worked on projects with no concern for recognition. And in the end get tied up by companies seeking profits and governments trying to capture knowledge and ability so they can drip feed it to the rest of the world. So you can feel indebted to them. I'm glad I appreciated that work. Even if I don't understand it.

[@tarreqmaulana9494]

nice editing&animation

[@KLAYTONAZEVEDO]

"For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. For the perishable must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality."

[@philossifer6252]

Lol, Minkowski. Never heard of him eh BBC? Also, if this is how relatively works, you've just debunked it smh.

[@faznaz7455]

As a physicist, some of the points made here made me cringe due to the accuracy of them.

[@mohamedmahadi3607]

Can you point out some of them?

[@faznaz7455]

0:23 Newton's laws did dxplain a lot but it was not before Einstein's theory of relativity that we got rid of his laws for today. For example, Einstein wasn't the one who discredited Newton's theory of light being only particles called Corpuscles (in reality light have both wave and particle properties). Newton's laws did not suddenly become discredited in the 20th century as the video suggests. Doesn't take much research to know this as well which disappoints me

[@faznaz7455]

@@mohamedmahadi3607 0:30 This is far too vague is it aims to be informative and also a half truth. Another example Also she uses gravity and gravitational force interchangeably or one instead of the other technically correct term.

[@faznaz7455]

@@mohamedmahadi3607 And this is just one minute of the video, i could go on but you see the point. It's far too vague to be informative and at times it may be confusing when you find out the information is not quite the way the lady clumsily put it.

[@Paine137]

@@faznaz7455 On larger scales, Newton fails. The orbit of Mercury couldn't be explained until GR.

[@judevector]

Since my childhood Einstein has always been my mentor

[@PiperTMTotalWar]

nice explanation

[@fixpacifica]

When I was taking physics in college, the professor said he thought maybe half-a-dozen people in the world truly understood general relativity.

[@englishbottlecap]

was your professor one of the half-dozen or one of the rest of the people in the world ?

[@fixpacifica]

@@englishbottlecap I'm sure he was one of the rest. Like me. I think I eventually got a handle on special relativity, but not general relativity.

[@NuclearCraftMod]

I think there is a slight over-estimation of how difficult to grasp this subject is. Sure, it is very far from straightforward, but most undergrads learn it in their final year(s) at uni. Unless you're talking about understanding the really tricky, complex problems, in which case you may be right :P

[@frankdimeglio8216]

@@NuclearCraftMod Generally relativity is political in accordance with maximum money making agenda “physics”. Galaxies disprove Einstein. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Here is the proof. WHY IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO SEPARATE inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, gravity, AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=MA IN BALANCE: Gravity is not fully and accurately described or accounted for by the idea of “curved” “space”. Consider the man who IS actually in what is outer “space”. Think about TIME. Consider what is THE MAN who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE, as gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; as gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) what is inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass”/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, as E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. Carefully consider what is THE SUN. Think about TIME. Consider what is the speed of light (c). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE. By Frank DiMeglio ABSOLUTE MATHEMATICAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=MA ON BALANCE: The balance of being and experience is essential. THE SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. GREAT !!! Think. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, as gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; as E=mc2 is F=ma. Accordingly, the rotation of what is the Moon matches it's revolution. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, as gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; as E=mc2 is F=ma ON BALANCE. Carefully consider what is the speed of light (c). The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the PLANETS will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is the Sun. THE EARTH/ground AND what is the Sun are CLEARLY linked AND BALANCED opposites, as E=mc2 is F=ma !!! “Mass”/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. THE EARTH is blue, AND the sky is ALSO BLUE ON BALANCE. Gravity is CLEARLY proven to be ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy on balance. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course). Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=mc2 is F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; as E=mc2 is F=ma ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense, AND BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. GREAT !!! By Frank DiMeglio

[@NuclearCraftMod]

@@frankdimeglio8216 I recommend you go learn some physics. None of your ramble contained any accurate account of mechanics, electromagnetism or relativity. You also neither proved anything, nor defined your terms.

[@shinmt2391]

So many experts in the comment

[@manjilkoirala7139]

Presentation is lit 🔥

[@silversilv451]

Time is not affected because it has no end or is perceptively sensual, because time is only a measure of any speed, it is just a (measure) What is affected is the speed, and this depends on the mass of the body + the force of the driving energy of the body Or that there is no mass, here the speed exceeds the limits until it reaches the stage of the mind not realizing it Accelerometer (The so-called time) is affected because the measure of time is a tangible body that has a mass or a perceptual feeling to a certain extent in relation to the human mind. We must differentiate between speed and time (accelerometer) Speed ​​has no limits relative to the mind or its perception, and time also has no limits because it depends on speed in measuring or translating it. This means when there is a speed, there will be a translation of this speed, which is (time) Emphasis on this statement if we recorded my voice as an example, meaning that the counting of numbers for one person was recorded, and we copied the same copy on another recording device for the same The sound, then we took a recording of the two, one of them is placed in the moving body and the other is fixed on the ground. We will find that there is no difference in the time count. Because the real difference is only the speed that affects the body, not the time

[@niewinskipiotr1993]

Well, this is copy-paste of other youtube videos, just a tiny little piece of Einstein's theory. This happens when journalists try to explain smth.

[@changbadinesh]

I am a student of physics but I believe in Newton more than I do in Einstein

[@prakashj2839]

Me too

[@changbadinesh]

great then

[@dbjkatz]

Both Newton and Einstein would be puzzled by that statement.

[@you7493]

@@changbadinesh we are few. Einstein only boosted by media. That's why he's popular and his relativity drama.

[@changbadinesh]

@@you7493 exactly....Einstein has been excessively praised by the media and physics enthusiasts, to the extent that few dare to discuss potential inconsistencies within the theory of relativity. There's a concern that contemporary science is leaning towards being more fictional than actual fiction.

[@Most-Handsome-Boy]

Amazing info....

[@craigissod6027]

Hmm....I think some better explanations of the implications could be found. Even Alberts own thought process about falling in an elevator of the tram car moving would help the layman....to properly explain, one needs to give multiple examples, one of which might hit home with the listener.

[@parikshit1328]

yeah i finally did it i am almost first. i want to thank everyone to bring me here. i want to mainly thank my elementary teacher who said one day i will be first (edit: wow 2 likes. I have never this much like in my whole life. Thank you everyone)

[@viscaelbarca2282]

Jerry u were second sorry :(

[@Fazzyfizz96]

Beautifully described this theory by BBC. Appreciated👍👍

[@jacktheconqueror3670]

It’s pretty intresting what you are saying, but I needed to use some extra attention to understand, the way it was said wasn’t pretty good! Newton was correct about the force of gravity that attracts the planets in our solar system, but from what I understood from this is that he didn’t take into consideration the space-time factor

[@rishabdevgupta8104]

Superb video and theory👌👌

[@abhinavsravanipriya1939]

he is a legend

[@rosilove28]

this is good revision for aqa paper 3 LMAO

[@johnsmith-li3di]

Close this page kid, do your homework lol.

[@Reggie-tf4ex]

We just need special, the maths for general is crazy.

[@Reggie-tf4ex]

@@Name7.62 Physics A level

[@bonnie3937]

Thank you. I finally understand!

[@theoutsiders6898]

Or simply buoyancy and density might explain it better ?

[@happyhaze1526]

Misleading. If you read the comments, it's considerably more of the latter than the former.

[@nettyvoyager6336]

the reason we are looking all this up is to debunk the flat earth and we are using this info to do so that's why you're seeing a jump in searches on these subjects

[@YouTube_is_full_of_trolls]

I hope your a troll, otherwise your just a total idiot

[@justinkemeter]

You don’t need Einstein’s theory of relativity to debunk the flat earth

[@YouTube_is_full_of_trolls]

@@justinkemeter right, you just need eyes and a brain...

[@YouTube_is_full_of_trolls]

@Witch House Your an idiot... I can't believe people like you even exist... it amazes me...

[@kishores7034]

Bad explanation didn't cover anything in the explanation

[@markwiedle7952]

Time is an idea concept. Change the idea concept. Change reality. No limitations. Imagination exceeds the speed of light.

[@AmyAmy-er8bp]

This way I remember my starting point and end point. Now the distance... I can go straight, I can do curves i can do triangles... that's without speed... the distance will be different then, to calculate...