Doctrine of Res Gestae | Section 6 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 | Currentiva

[@riyabhawna6198]

These are very nice explanations and are easy to understand. Thanku for making such useful videos, ma'am ❤

[@shambhavimishra5019]

Amazing mam.. thanku ❤

[@siddharthparmar1155]

Thank you for these informative video

[@shubharao59]

Well explained. Thank you.

[@soniadkhar1965]

Thank you so much

[@kalyan150168]

excellent presentation

[@davidchandekar9647]

wonderfully explained amazing

[@CurrentivaWeb]

thank you :) please stay connected for more

[@kajalparvin2663]

❤thnq❤

[@siyamandrekar8154]

2nd condition of admissibility is wrong... you have wrote "not the witness of transaction"

[@vivanphillips5988]

Yeah man! She has written 'and' instead of 'or' totally changes the meaning of the Statement! Correction- The statement must have been made by a participant or the witness of the same transaction! Bas and ki jagah or laga do guys dont be confused ok !

[@manita416]

Thank you for explaining so well.. Helped me a lot

[@CurrentivaWeb]

hey, Glad you liked it mate :) stay tuned for more.

[@SunnyShrivastavaji-vo2cs]

well explained

[@vivanphillips5988]

Correction- The statement must have been made by a participant or the witness of the same transaction! Bas and ki jagah or laga do guys. Confused mat hona admissibility of Res Gestae mai

[@tejraoingle6831]

🙏 Thank you 🙏

[@iamindia8486]

Allah bless on you sister your voice is amazing and explain very easy

[@CurrentivaWeb]

JazakAllah Khair. Keep supporting :)

[@rieriba3673]

What about hearsay of RAPE