You voice is so good , can be used for glory of God.
@indiaviewministries48463 ай бұрын
Good teaching!
@Sibasethy-l9v7 күн бұрын
Real important sir all' would biggest famous god
@GitaBagh-ki4ll5 күн бұрын
Praise the lord 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏❤❤❤❤❤❤, ✝️✝️✝️✝️✝️
@deepaknayak76864 күн бұрын
Anyway, your interpretation is Good.But I do not agree with the Order of Trinity in Point No. 5.The order of Trinity does not make someone greater than 2 others. However, (Jesus said Father is greater than I )in John 14:28. We would say God is the first Person,Son is the second and Holy Spirit is Third Person.( Manifestation) So in order to reach out God, we need holy spirit to know Jesus and through Jesus we can reach Father.I think this is the best interpretation as I was taught by Holy Spirit.
@devaprasadsingh8453 сағат бұрын
Thank you for your comments. I already explained in the video that one person is not greater than the other. All are co-equal, co-eternal and co-existent. Three persons are indivisible, we can't separate them into three. In other words, they are not existing side by side. If we think so, then they become Three Gods, not One. But our God is One.That is the beauty and mystery of God which Human being can't comprehend fully. Yes, Jesus Christ was in spirit before incarnation. Because God by nature is spirit (John 4:24). But, that God became flesh (human being), so that man could see him when he was on earth. But, his body was not something that represented the father, but his nature, the very character (Hebrew 1:3).
@LuluSabhanayak-k3y3 ай бұрын
Mathew 11_27_rey jisu kohonti Putra jahanko nikotorey pita nku prakaso koribaku chanti kebolo semaney hi janibey apono Bible podhi jemiti kohiley joney nastiko Bible podhi thik semiti hi kohibo khristo nko ro prakasono kahin?akshyar ro mrutyu jonoko Jodi Bible Rey kebalo eko byokti o eko Prabhu dekha ja anti nahi tebe there is a problem
@devaprasadsingh8453 ай бұрын
I don't understand your point clearly. But, the scripture (Matthew 11:27) you have mentioned speaks about the clear distinction between father and son, which I have clearly stated. But, if you still have problem with it, you may clearly mention it, which I would reply to. thanks