Does AI Mean THE END For Software Developers?

[@AndySterkowitz]

What are your thoughts on artificial intelligence taking over and making programmers obsolete?

[@Omar-_-_]

Will even if that happens, AI needs it's engineers, so we will take our knowledge of computers, add up to it, and shift our careers to AI, in opinion, no science dies, even if programming goes away, it's theories and core concepts will be used in something else, so I am no that much worried any ways... (This comment was before watching the video)

[@Omar-_-_]

And also I believe that no one can actually create a human mind, it's so much complex, that it can't be created by us, or created by "natural coencidents", so since programming is based on logic, we won't be replaced anyways, and as you said, the apps are so much more complex than a code that can write an article...

[@faisalreviews8857]

If ai was not enough, now we have quantum computing coming up that only physicists can understand right now, but promises to be exponentially powerful than bit structure and every big tech company is running after it. Developers days seem numbered for sure. Scientists r going to take over. I feel developers would just be left as 'Operators' just like a data entry operator whose job is to just feed data. And everything else would be done by powerful technology.

[@mistycloud4455]

A.G.I Will be man's last invention

[@wheelieblind]

it generates incomplete code for examples but sometimes they actually work lol If you know of any program that produces code I do not need to fix please let me know, I am trying to make lsl scripts for second life.

[@ilkrsrc081]

There is wordpress, wix, squarespace for years and the demand for web developers is still rising. Also, if even there will be an AI tool to generate useful code, software developers are gonna be the first people who learn that tool and use it.

[@jr-yn4lk]

Yeah but if there is a tool in the future to do the basic code structure, I feel like junior jobs won't be a thing anymore

[@kartikchauhan2778]

That's some nonsense argument imo , the tools made nowadays are far able and better than the tools made 10 yrs ago , and they are going to get better

[@awesomedude4428]

@@kartikchauhan2778 And that's some nonsense argument too imo, no matter how advance it gets, no company can directly implement the code without knowing anything about it, it won't entirely replace software developer, but then it will also create new opportunities. It's a glass half filled and half empty thing.

[@tokomnyori6730]

@@jr-yn4lk It's 21 May 2023 and your future prediction was right. The AI war has begun with the release of ChatGPT 4. The need for junior devs is decreasing because senior devs can manage the junior devs' tasks effortlessly. Companies like IBM have already declared, they'll hire fewer devs.

[@JesseRedmanBand]

I've been a developer for decades. Different groups have been promoting some version of, "auto code", generators since the mid 1980's. Nothing, to date, has made it to wide-spread adoption.

[@AndySterkowitz]

Great point!

[@hunggamerofficial3252]

"auto code"??? Come on, we all know that "auto code" wouldn't even exist if human did not invent it in the first place. If A.I could do all the jobs, i would love to see how that thing does it(Which never happened to be honest).

[@vonb2792]

Bill gate was talking about AI in 1990. It usually takes 50 years for the "new tech" to become mainstream...

[@mdesnica]

And mistake no2 that many make is to think software development is just about programming. More than half work is understanding the business and customers, communication. To replace a software developer AI have to do that too. AI is a scam. Most solutions that are called "AI" are just simple plain programs with no magic.

[@vonb2792]

@@mdesnica Agreed for now, things evolve to become autonomous quite fast and eventually no need for ''tech guys''. I see it in finance all the time... also these assets managers and portfolio investment professionnals are being replaced by Engineers who code to ''automate'' the process... Some of my software guys are working on AI to automate the coding.... AI will replace the ''technical'' and all corporations will look for ''emotions / client management'' which its happening in finance.

[@slimyelow]

I have put so much blood, sweat and tears into my self-education, if AI came along to take my job I would hire a hitman.

[@Frogingscope]

Better make ai for trading stocks , evolve or die

[@charitysimon-peraboh5555]

Hahaha

[@sunshadow9704]

You won’t.

[@zexsen85]

Not in near future, because then clients must give precise defitinion what they want... 😁

[@AndySterkowitz]

Lol this is the hardest thing to explain to the average person IMO

[@anthonyma8098]

That is easy. Clients will be ai too. 🤖

[@zexsen85]

@@anthonyma8098 humas will play for robots 😁😁

[@nikhilyadav-lh3lv]

@@AndySterkowitz Will it decrease head count of developers?

[@theragavelan]

@@nikhilyadav-lh3lv Not really as new jobs will be emerging. But yes salary and demand of developers with same skills might reduce.

[@damianrudling7663]

I think what will do more damage is the no code drag and drop applications. For example, you would write an entire python script to automate something, but now you can just use drag and drop blue prism and develop the same thing 7 times faster.

[@dmitryrodetsky5573]

Honestly I think it will be a good tool to generate boiler plates, but other then that AI is not actually a very smart thing. It can be really effective in a finite state doing something mundane that humans hate doing anyway. And honestly this is a reason why even though self-driving cars are hyped up all around - I am pretty sure that it will fail in the end because there will always be conditions for which the AI did not train simply because our world and environment is not clean and orderly. AI cannot think creatively and if situation was not in a training set - it will end up making mistakes. Basically human oversight will have to be present anyway.

[@Bilal5619]

I think AI can copy and paste code, search code on internet able to write hello world in all languages but unable to solve problems and algorithms which is required constantly ..

[@HCforLife1]

Not even that. People vision creates problems to solve. Until AI will be able to create reality will be not able to solve problems which appear on the development way.

[@22RH544]

That is why I also specialized in low level and highly specific hardware programming e.g. hardware image sensor acquisition/processing, custom RFID tag writers e.t.c.This simply cannot be replaced by AI as the hardware/software application is often new, custom and unique.

[@e4gail]

IMO we are still 10 years out till meaningful coding jobs are even starting to be replaced with AI.

[@AndySterkowitz]

Agreed.

[@book5257]

Potentially more than 10 years. The "better" they want the ai, the longer it will take to make. If you want ai that actually makes whole projects for you, it will PROBABLY take much longer

[@lubeckable]

Frontend firts

[@JCR4990]

10 years is fairly optimistic and before AI takes over coding jobs it will have already taken over most of the jobs in our economy and we'll have to address that as a society long before any of this becomes an issue. This isn't really something to worry about imo.

[@mdesnica]

Before computers can code, show me a robot that can walk on TWO legs. No wheels, bandwagons or flying drones, just walking.

[@Sergeant_Camacho]

lol that thumbnail is awesome! Keep the good videos coming, bro!

[@defenestratedalien1448]

I think true AI is still a long way away based on the techniques we have now. If/when we get AI that can completely take over all aspects of a developer's job, developer jobs will be the least of our challenges.

[@AndySterkowitz]

Exactly!

[@mistycloud4455]

A.G.I Will be man's last invention

[@hovardlee]

If you have a data model described (eg. in db tables) you can generate some code. So you can save a lot of time in the beginning. And then change requests are coming. And after that you cannot use it anymore to re-generate code because of customizations.

[@KamranRiyaz]

Maybe AI could take over small scale app development but not the complex one. The biggest limitation of AI is lack of reasoning. Models used for Machine Learning needs a huge data set to produce accurate results. As a software developer, we need to be flexible because tech is dynamic. But no doubt in future, we're going see mind blowing advancements in AI.

[@agh1750]

Would you say electrical engineering has a lower risk of being automated than software engineering?

[@DjordjeSusa555]

If any of these jobs get automated I would say all of us can be replaced easily. But that begs a question what will happen with so many people out of business?

[@markernestinciong]

It's weird how I got to this video when I searched "In The End". I was looking for that song by Linkin Park, and now it looks like I'm going to study webdev because of it. Thanks Andy!

[@georgemanley3755]

Developers are still going to have to do the problem solving (along with determining what problems need to be solved) and algorithmic thinking for a long while yet. I don't see anyone replacing something like Cisco's WEB UI or custom scripting to automate network configuration. I just don't see it... but I still put my name on the waiting list, to see how many of my well-thought-out problem descriptions become usable code... then grumble and read my own notes to bang out something in VS Code or Community. And remember, when it comes to learning, know thyself and how you best absorb a lesson!

[@Sergeant_Camacho]

Honestly, if AI could handle all the CSS design-madness (responsive mobile-first design, flex, padding, white space, etcetera) I'm ok with that. Sometimes I feel wasting my time dealing with that, so if AI can help you with that, I'm on board!

[@hunggamerofficial3252]

I have the same question like yours, man. In my case, if A.i could handle the pain of dealing with ReactJS, go ahead. I've been waiting years for that to happen. Oh wait, it never happened.

[@HCforLife1]

I would say the first to replaced might be not designers with little knowledge of code but rather programmers with little knowledge of design. Anyway we are still like 15-20 years away from any of this.

[@freepatriot9070]

My mentor calls it css circus

[@TheGingerpeer]

Thanks Andy. This really took a load off. I completely agree with you.

[@SurfingTheMentawais]

Thanks for the heads-up advice Andy.

[@truffletrouble7819]

I'm not worried about AI taking over my job, I'm just worried about the SKYNET robo-dogs coming after me.

[@jeremythomas9813]

So I guess as an aspiring developer I should continue to move forward in my learning?

[@dwanejohnson3772]

It blows my mind how accurately AI like kite can guess my next line of code

[@luiggymacias5735]

Is it better than tabnine?

[@in4theride75]

AI will be like the computer was to typists; one person could do the job of 30. Those who utilize AI to enhance work production will do the job that requires multiple programmers to do now. What will happen is you'll have two camps of people: those that have super highly specialized technical skills for specific tasks (like assembly programmers are now), and basic users with little to no technical knowledge. I would not be surprised to see massive decreases in wages due to the massive decrease in learning curve, but AI will not eliminate programmers until an AGI becomes a thing.

[@hovardlee]

I remember project where java devs were generating db tables with hibernate and one of my tasks was to verify if this model is ok and fix the issues. Also imagine sql reports in data warehouse generated by automatic tools. The code is so bad and inefficient.

[@Ty-wf6mg]

Just about done a coding camp and this really makes me nervous about my future.

[@defenestratedalien1448]

As long as you can learn, u don't have a problem. Except if u plan to be here year 10910

[@JCR4990]

Lol don't be nervous. This is a long way away in the most optimistic of AI advancement scenarios.

[@michaelnurse9089]

Hi Andy, everyone. I have studied this topic to death and I a have also studied Deep Learning itself. Below are some insights I have learned that shape the debate. 1) If you add up all the vaguely 'value-adding' activities people do in the World today, you find there is enough 'good work' for about 20 hours a week. 500 years ago the average peasant worked an 80 hour week. In other words, mankind has already been rendered 75% redundant by the tractor. AI is threatening to push this 20 hours to 10 hours. The social impact of this changes like this cannot be underestimated. It will also add jobs but these will be an order of magnitude lower and only for some. 2) AI does only one thing - pattern recognition (but often 10x better than humans) - it cannot understand the common sense meaning of anything. Also, if something falls outside its dataset, it literally cannot deal with it. Humans will still be sorely needed - just not all humans. 3) Powerful AI is really, really, really expensive to build - mostly in costs to acquire the data and pay and also pay a huge team of AI specialists. Training cost to rent gpu's for inference can easily amount to $1mil but this cost is usually just incidental to the whole operation. You need the smartest minds and you need lots of them. 4) AI is on the cusp of disrupting some other industries - notably driving a vehicle, labor intensive agriculture and retail store attendant - by some measures the three largest employers of people. You are a fool to think some of those displaced will not enter the software industry if they can - this can put real pressure on the supply side even if AI does nothing in software. Those displaced can also just "Storm the capital" and instead of a 1000 flagpole wielding ogres it can be easily 1000x this number carrying AR15's. Previous waves of poverty have caused exactly this - it is just we have mostly forgotten. 5) Software engineering has different parts - some are real soft targets (like imo copying the style of another website onto your ui) and others are safe (talking to clients and understanding their exact needs) - it is going to depend a lot on what sort of thing you do. 6) Perhaps the biggest thing is that none of the big tech companies are currently targeting the software engineer space with their AI teams - but are rather chasing other more 'juicy' targets. On a long enough timeline they may in turn come approach this area - but I doubt it - my unqualified opinion is that highly quality programmers will be the last to be impacted. 7) AI/Data Science is currently in the trough on the Gartner Hype Cycle. Two years ago they promised us everything and all we got was Alexa and Star Wars Deepfakes. So investment into AI is no longer a focus area for every single corporation - there is now a general oversupply of junior level data scientists. Covid-19 is complicit too. But be warned - this won't stop the real progress - watch a few Tesla full self driving videos and some SpaceX commercial launches to see what is possible with AI (and software too) is currently doing well. 8) If AI works exactly like the techno-optimists believe - production of goods and services will become mostly trivial - only demand and fairness needs to be addressed - and something like UBI (free money handouts) can address this - don't assume you actually want this - UBI looks to be a miserable existence in a Brave New World kind of way. So - is AI going to eat your full-stack developer job? If you forced me to guess I would say: 1 - year. No way - 100% guaranteed. 3 years. 3% chance or 3% of programmers impacted. 10 years. 25% chance or 25% of programmers impacted. 100 years. 90% chance or 90% of programmers impacted. It is the 10 year timeline you really need to watch out for.

[@bemaat6723]

Thanks for your detailed comment.

[@Fvckyou123]

bullshit

[@jaydenmoon1165]

ugh first Obj-C - then Swift - Then JavaScript (React) - guess I will start learning how to program my future leaders and gods :(

[@carnage3343]

If ai becomes so good that it can code, say goodbye to all jobs because coding is harder intellectually than 90% of job. Ai at that level will just finish all the doctors, lawyers, engineers, teachers.

[@vonb2792]

Happening in finance already.

[@dindoleonard]

Lawyers actually cannot be replaced because Law has too much humane-touch in it.

[@vonb2792]

@@dindoleonard having a community of lawyers around me, they all complaining how their fees are going down, clients harder to find, and technology does much of their "backoffice/work" also how clients use the internet to "outsmart them" ... everything that is codified can be replaced by a robot... so Lawyer, like accountant, like financial advisor and wealth manager are turning into "PR" people

[@johnjordan3552]

Teaching is probably better when you are physical, I think doctors will probably stay due to responsibility issues but engineering jobs will probably diminish only leaving very high level engineers

[@conelrad1447]

lmfaooo so wrong.

[@gameplayvideos9758]

How many projects you recommand putting into my resume? Thanks for your time peace and love.

[@haribhauchavan7044]

What should I take after 12th artificial intelligence or software Engineer please reply.!!!

[@faisalreviews8857]

If ai was not enough, now we have quantum computing coming up that only physicists can understand right now, but every big tech company is running after it. Developers days seem numbered for sure. Scientists r going to take over....

[@lww8229]

gpt-3 is not a problem, but its descendants surely will kill most dev jobs, junior jobs first, I imagine.

[@hunggamerofficial3252]

I don't know about that, but i bet we will still be able to keep our jobs, just a thought

[@erifiliharavitsidou4477]

Gpt 3 read the whole internet, what else remains to empower ai even more? What kind of pc hardware can run these programs?

[@lifeform106]

I think that it is not a problem only for programmers but for all jobs in general and I don't think this will be a problem for just programmers but lots and lots of people will be against it. Programming requires lots of critical thinking higher than most jobs and if robots get that speed then so many jobs around the world would be taken. I can see so much protest of so many people losing their jobs. I would say the reason why in an economic stand-up this wouldn't work is that if we are able to make robots think equally as critically as people then so many people would lose their jobs, nobody would be able to pay their taxes to the government because robots don't produce money they take away the economy money, and wouldn't be a happy world for anyone. Web development helped the economy and connect and make more business while robots will take it away. I personally say the only way this would make everyone happy is to see these robots as like Wordpress or wix or Squarespace where they can create simple websites but if a programmer was available or needed to build a more complicated application then a web developer would be needed. If a business needed only a small website then they could use this stuff but more unique things or making an even better product. Web developers would be around for a long time. For example, there are people I know who made a website in WordPress that is simple, but when I builtt a better website with HTML,css and javascript they would gladly want that to stand out of the competition.

[@Victor-hg5sx]

what do u mean when u said robots don't make money? was that a joke? Of course not, they produce a lot of value which in turn is sold to the market, reducing production cost for it is way more efficient than humans because they don't need to eat, sleep, or shit. With the product now costing less, therefore, making society's way of life richer and easier. So, just because an AI is smarter than you to the point where they can take your job doesn't necessarily mean they're all bad and you can always make money off other things.

[@lifeform106]

@@Victor-hg5sx What do you mean by making money off of other things? Other things besides coding?

[@Victor-hg5sx]

​@@lifeform106 well, in a world where AI took over the programming field, you wouldn't have a choice but to go another route. Either you evolve or die, but surely in a scenery like this one, there would be new capacities in the tech field, only different.

[@Victor-hg5sx]

back when the industrial revolution's started, a lot of people had their jobs replaced by machines, but many more were created because of it

[@first275]

The very initial days when gpt3 was released last year, i signed up for the beta api And recently I got access to the openai api beta, I have been exploring the possibilities of the api. And what I ponder is that these tools aren't there to replace programmers, there are here to assist us and that the devs will need to have a tech stack greater than ever before in the coming decades.

[@gabrielfono844]

you are absolutely right

[@danishvk4550]

Does I study software engineer? For my future..🤔🤔🤔

[@erifiliharavitsidou4477]

Can gpt 3 make a program with c++ that solves sudoku? I mean can gpt 3 really make complex things like solving an equation or make complicated programs? I havent seen anything like this yet.

[@VishalKumar-lk1pt]

it write a programe to solve quadratic equations.

[@Jonathan_Henderson]

Brilliant video, Andy! GPT-3 gives us a glimpse of the future

[@imqqmi]

The first ai to understand context alone isn't quite there yet let alone one that can solve simple problems. You probably spend as much time configuring and coaxing such a system to get it to do remotely what you want and spend the rest coding in the blind spots as coding the whole thing from scratch. I think there may be a natural progression for ai to augment a dev to perform repetitive tasks for them like refactoring code, checking for security issue, do debugging suggestions and fix simple mistakes. And modular problem solving blocks that's designed to solve highly specialized problems like recognition, ie character recognition, fingerprint, faces, virus detection both bio as well as digital etc. You still need to build and improve these things, and create context so it makes sense in how they are used and interacted with. Build the glue logic around them etc. Ai can't step back and offer the next level of improvents outside of its configured parameters. A character recognition ai can't be expected to evolve to recognize and understand words, sentences, stories, series of books, libraries, studies, theories etc. on its own. And it's dangerous to to allow ai to evolve that far. Imagine asking ai to 'build an unhackable system no one can break into'. Thinking out of the box, if it problems solves by eliminating 'no one' from the equation you just eliminate all people on this planet so the system is secure. So for the foreseeable future I think devs live in interesting times ☺️

[@BjornUltimatum]

In the same way QuickBooks is used by accountants to improve their output, code-writing software will just be another tool for developers to to be more effective. I think if you're humble and willing to constantly learn you'll always have a valuable skill in this industry.

[@foreverhumanpodcast]

Even if it was in the next two years that just means we need to learn other skills. So many people transition into IT from something else which is enough proof to show folks that we can really be whatever we want. If A.I is making the code then someone is going to have to supervise the A.I and still review the code. People need to learn how to shift their thinking to realize humans will NEVER be replaced. Stop letting the movies fool you. This is an AMAZING thing. No machine can have an imagination like humans do that come up with the next big thing. You know why airplanes have wings? Because birds have wings. There are plenty of aircraft that work without wings but as humans evolved and saw wings on birds that flew so we made a flying machine to memic those things that fly. Stop running away from A.I stop running away from change and the unknown. This is how we grow and this is how humans change. Don't be afraid of A.I what we need to be afraid of is ourselves and how we think and our mindsets as a collective consciousness. A.I and human symbiosis is key to our next step of evolution. Learn A.I now so you can better manage the future. Just like learning to code. Spend the time to learn and understand A.I everyday. "We over estimate what we can do in a day and under estimate what we can do in a year.".

[@mikehancho5286]

Programming will get the same treatment the auto industry did......................automation, and smaller work force. Every industry see's this!

[@konradd8545]

The hype around A.I. is usually generated by people that have no idea about A.I. which is kind of good because it brings money and attention to new technologies. It can be bad as well because it generates a lot of false information in websites like you've mentioned in your video 😂 GPT-3 is indeed impressive (and other work that OpenAI does as well!), but I think we need to wait for GPT-28 for anything that resembles human performance and 'creativity'. In single quotes as creativity is a completely different beast on its own (don't want to go into philosophy here). Another aspect is that the GPT algorithm is very limited in what it can do (as with every other modern AI solution). We have all these fancy algorithms out there but they work on their own. There is no 'thinking' in these algorithms, there is no problem solving, connecting the dots, and figuring stuff out. There is just (oversimplification alert!) brute force of supervised (or non-supervised) machine learning. So yeah, we are fine for the next few decades 😁

[@mistycloud4455]

A.G.I Will be man's last invention

[@jos3roth475]

I have seen content creators mentioning that GPT will be positive for developers because it will increase the amount of programmers instead of less. Why do people think that this is a good thing for most developers? Unless you are looking to hire developers more is not better.

[@AndySterkowitz]

Because it’s not a zero sum game where there is only a little pie to share. We’re barely tapping the potential for things that can be automated. Most businesses are not even scratching the surface of what they could do with software...so I wouldn’t worry too much about it. If anything more qualified developers would only increase the pie to be shared.

[@jos3roth475]

@@AndySterkowitz I like your outlook, I hope you're right!

[@tamilmovieshood7390]

🧡iam a fan of you in srilanka bro

[@vonb2792]

Can't remember last time I wrote an email... Google reads my mind and magically type It all... well in finance, programmers are replacing asset managers..all that is codified will be robotized

[@connorskudlarek8598]

Keep in mind, when you come onto a project that other developers have been working on... they already generated the code you're going to be altering, tweaking, testing, or adding to. They just did what GPT-3 does, but way more advanced and with way more specificity. GPT-3 is more like using a power drill to help you put in some screws. At some point, you're going to need to put in a nail and GPT-3 is going to want to use screws. That is when you will be needed, to overrule it and use nails. At some point in the future, it might learn to be a power drill and a nail gun... but then you'll need to use some wood glue, and it won't use wood glue. You may use GPT-3 to get an advanced skeleton, but at the end of the day someone still needs to do the rest of it. We have pretty standard ways of starting code, this will just help with starting that code with a little meat on the bones.

[@Gaxi2]

I remember there was a AI on twitter which became racist after sometime due to human interaction. The problem is AI can't feel the need of someone who is using it. So, maybe it will be frustrating to guide it again and again. Also, people want this to be unique and detailed. But it can replace the small or easy coding jobs.

[@goat-sama]

Well, if these are the best possible outcomes, it will soon become standard. This is in fact very scary.

[@j03Biz]

Basically it doesn't answer the question. because the answer is "It's definitely coming", or actually that is the answer... In other words, if you are using a boilerplate or standard in coding something, it its a set of concrete instructions and can be replicated since we are replicating it. The evolution is what AI is programming, it can grow, and even now just shows how much growth GPT has grown. Think about it, if you have employees doing the same thing over and over as their job, a robot can do it as well, it just depends on the growth.

[@CoolTVent]

999,099 is a number before 1m you have to be specific in prompt

[@mikevalentino2225]

Dude even 1 year later with gpt 4 its already increased by like 100 times by next year i doubt many programmers will have a job. this thing is coding full front end websites in seconds that would take you months.

[@Anime_Empire_2.0]

i don't think AI is gonna replace developers entirely, BUT I do think that is gonna change the game as years go by the future of coding will be less coding and Yes I bet these AI software can create components in one click, but who is gonna test and debug ?? thats where we come in .

[@alanmunoz3755]

How does the AI will learn new technologies, frameworks and languages as fast as human developers?

[@krishjaat007]

Will software engineering be replaced by AI??

[@moazzamshahzad6078]

But slowly they will progress. Let's take the example of the machine which beat the world champion of Go. Slowly, they will learn fast. I am on Elon Musk's side that AI will be a danger for us. By the way, great video.

[@619trading9]

Strange question like what came first the egg or chicken

[@aslanbc]

Software engineers create a tool that could make software engineers redundant. Oh the irony

[@maycj]

How is 990,099 not before 1,000,000? :)

[@AndySterkowitz]

lol

[@pierreabbat6157]

I thought "GUID partition table 3".

[@dakoderii4221]

I just was watching Tom Scott's video on AI videos. Watch that and that will answer your question. If AI can't pick good video titles yet then it can't write good code yet either. It can help the human out but replace in the next few years? No, IMO.

[@AndySterkowitz]

Love Tom Scott!

[@Gainz38]

better get into a trade that cant be replaced while you can

[@jimmyryan5880]

I'm an Shakespeare either, that's a ridiculous bar.

[@sohailb1894]

I think we need to stop for a sec and think that do we really need it? We are heading towards a more scarier world I guess!

[@ambientlightofdarknesss4245]

Unless a average joe can't tell an AI "make the most efficient program without any bugs or glitches for my project" There will still be a place for software developers.

[@rolandpierrelouis4013]

Andy doesn't promote his mentorship program in this video...He might be afraid of GPT-3 to not get his clients 😂

[@AndySterkowitz]

Lol

[@mynameisjeff9124]

The problem is not gpt3 it’s gpt5

[@The0Stroy]

Well - someone needs to make AI engines and troubleshoot them and know if what they produce is useful.

[@CodingWorm]

I hope not. But that would be interesting. I have a channel to

[@lazaryanya9407]

I have yet to see a baby AI let alone a good attempt at it. Machines can't think. Programs can fake thinking but people think. IDEs have made programmers lazy and their codes buggy.

[@anthonyobryan3485]

We've been on the edge of AI making humans obsolete for the last 38 years, yet it hasn't happened and will probably never happen. AI will always suffer from what I am coining as the 40/60/90 rule: AI will do 40% of what we want; but it will never be able to do the last 60% of what we need, which is where 90% of the useful features reside.

[@northstarcode8675]

THEY TOOK OUR JEEEEERBS

[@AndySterkowitz]

Alternate thumbnail title

[@dglover326]

We’re always in the stage of evolution guys, don’t let a new competitor discard your ventures. Take advantage of AI or it will take advantage of you.

[@Lethgar_Smith]

We are still a ways off from true "AI" True Artificial Intelligence is supposed to mean a conscious machine or computer. Like what we think of when we think of a robot like C-3PO. Not, a series of preprogramed responses based on an algorithm like Sophia. I hate that stupid thing. That's not AI. We're not likely to be able to achieve a true consciousness in a machine until we discover what consciousness truly is. New theories about the nature of reality, that the universe is a holographic image constructed by our consciousness, could mean that consciousness exist independent from the physical brain. If that's the case then the key to achieving AI is to build a computer that a conscious entity can inhabit.

[@qwerty12221]

Reassuring :)

[@guilhermehx7159]

👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

[@mahmudrahman9855]

Your are just hoping

[@Quidoute]

*nice*

[@Mr.Miller9]

Nah I highly doubt it

[@mahmudrahman9855]

Just matter of time

[@solutionsforabrightfuture3579]

Software developers are the most hated profession in the world as far as legal jobs. They refuse to fix problems. I can have an overpowered pc still freez up because incompetent developers chose not to fix problems and blame everyone but themselves.

[@-Engineering01-]

I think I'll be a beekeeper when AI comes out.

[@limitless1692]

Yes you should be worried. Ok fine if GPT-3 will not replace you... Then in 5 years or so GPT-4 will definetly replace you!!

[@theboringtube]

I need terminator

[@donaldhobson8873]

Eventually AI will make all human activities obsolete.

[@hunggamerofficial3252]

Honestly, there's nothing to think about, if you ask me. A.I was created by humans and believe me, that thing is still s**tty. Just look at how it recommends videos for me(or anybody else), you can tell what is what. I mean, if A.I could handle the pain in the butt of working with ReactJS or Vuejs, i would be glad to let A.I do it. Yet, it never could, and we're still here, aren't we? Not to mention the fact that companies don't hire A.I to do the job, they hire programmers like us to do the jobs. Unless companies can create super soldiers like in the movie(which they can't, and it will never happen in real life for political reasons that i don't wanna talk about in this channel of yours), you can bet that we programmers will never be obsolete.

[@smilebot484]

the ai bots are coming. 5 years from now we will not be writing code. it's already largely gluing pieces together. so i would not go into software development today. get a trade instead.

[@bigblessed4732]

AI will still need human to guide them through😂

[@pauldiam0nd]

niiiiiiiiiiice!!!!!!!!!! A.I. LAWYERS LOL

[@Dan-pi6dx]

Damn these comments aged badly

[@seeithappen1]

What a silly topic . . . but of course, it was never meant as a serious topic . . . it's just clever clickbait . . .

[@miroslavpetrov3006]

This is a hype that will die in the next months

[@daystarcreations]

Stop the rice of, THE MACHINE!!!

[@daystarcreations]

;)