Does anyone need 800mm?

In this video I discuss using the Nikon 180-600mm f6.3 compared to the 800mm pf f6.3. They are both great lenses but they each have their strengths and weaknesses.
About me:-
My name is Martin Sepion. I have a passion for nature and photography. I try to improve my photography everyday. I am based in Leytonstone, London.
See higher resolution photos on Flickr at
www.flickr.com....
Connect:-
Twitter: @Martin_Sepion
email: [e-mail]

[@danieleverywhere132]

why English always say emmmmmm?

[@Bikerbeest]

With the 180-600 mm your are flexible and when it goes about quality and sharpness the prime lens NIkon Z 800 F6.3 is way ahead over the zoom lens

[@Walkinginthewoods]

Very true, you cannot beat a prime for sharpness

[@birdzandbees]

Great comparison and well thought out comments. As you know I have the 800mm of and love it but…… recently I’ve had a shoulder problem plus I’ve been concentrating on insects so I might be thinking of the 180-600mm instead but not sure if there is that much of a weight difference.I’ll have to look in to it. But I do own the 400mm f4.5 with the tc 1.4x which has produced great results and flexible when it comes to light and is incredibly light so I’m at a weird point in my photography.

[@Walkinginthewoods]

@birdzandbees Paul you can try my 180-600. Will let you know next time I am up your way.

[@Tbonyandsteak]

Use 100-400 mm with a 40 mp Apsc, which is 600 mm on a 26 mp. It have become my main lens, when I walk with my dog. It fullfill my needs very well and are soo practically. Cant use a bigger lens and dont need that reach.

[@Walkinginthewoods]

Sounds like a good setup