Does Matt.

[@TWIT1611]

I’ve come across this issue so many times in my personal circle and it’s so sad that people think language is somehow tough for God. We can’t have preservation without inspiration otherwise why would God inspire his words for it to be lost in the future. I believe this is the most important issue today because without a final authority, we are left with the modern day Pharisees to tell us what the Bible really says. I have every word of God and it’s pure! Amen! Proverbs 30:5-6 KJB Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. [6] Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.

[@mobymagg]

Thank you very much for making these videos on this matter. "That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God." (1Cor.2:5).

[@jessiewilson2306]

Thank you again David for your dedication to our Truth!

[@jimmyfranklin4781]

1 Thessalonians 2:13 “For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.” King James Version (KJV)

[@1611K_J_B]

Preserservation and inspiration are combined together and can not be broken apart!

[@Cambo212]

Amen bro David. Thank you for teaching the truth of scripture preservation

[@jORDNjAMESmuSICk]

There's the Bible believing approach and the "scholarly" approach. One must decide where the authority is. Same issue same subtlety different look.

[@jessiewilson2306]

Like you said a long time ago,we don’t need evidence because it is a FAITH position!

[@GodisGracious1031Ministries]

Amen. Great points about Psalm relating to the law.

[@diligent_seeker]

Amen! So thankful you are addressing this issue as it must be publicly dealt with to help others discern the heresy being put forth by Bryan Ross; I hope he can recover himself from this serious error, but first he must humble himself. Quite the faux paus there about "one must amend their understanding of preservation to match what the Bible teachers teach about the matter." Surely, he'll correct that statement promptly, but what he really needs to do is correct his whole stance on the KJB to being faithful to the word of God, thus being faithful to the LORD.

[@teresayoung3281]

Thank u for the truth of the word!

[@scarir12]

AMEN PASTOR!!! Thank you for this Q&A.

[@scottw1828]

KJB is the Word of God. I believe there were dragons, unicorns and satyrs. I believe every word about me before and after being saved by grace. I believe the KJB is the eternal, perfectly preserved Word of God. I believe that believing is essential to true internal joy. I love my brothers and sisters. It breaks my heart for those who wander off from the simplicity of Christ.

[@jORDNjAMESmuSICk]

Also a translation must have preservation in the process or it'll be a corruption. And seeing as God promised to be involved in the preservation, he by necessity was involved in the translation process.

[@itlupe]

When I run into folk that morph when they see I carry a KJB, I simply shake my head and walk away. I don't have the time or the intelligence to argue about my beliefs. I have found those rejecting the KJB do so simply because I don't agree with their version. In the end, it has nothing to do with the truth in Scripture. It has to do with their indoctrination by bad teachers. Here is what I KNOW: I am saved by grace; I belong to the body of Christ; I will serve in heavenly places; my apostle is Paul; my doctrine comes from Romans through Philemon. Thank you brother Dave for your teaching and dedication.

[@donaldmorgan9149]

Well done Pastor O'Steen.

[@PaulYoung-tj7gn]

Bryan Ross has a BUT in his speaking on the King James issue, in other words God failed to get the right men together to have his words preserved exactly the way that he wanted his words preserved. Thanks brother David for being faithful in pointing this out, and standing for the truth of preservation in God's book (king James ). Paul Young.

[@russhall187]

I came to a logical conclusion before I was saved that if there is a Holy God? that he has a book for us to go by. Got saved reading a KJV asking God to show me the truth. I ain't moving from this position no matter what anyone says or does

[@kennethattard5538]

Looking over the quote in question, among other things, I don’t think it was a “Freudian slip”, of course with Ross as it appears, words really don’t mean things… i’m sure if we miss quoted Ross and added or deleted from the word he spoke or wrote he would be very concerned. Why? Because words mean things!!! Anybody who’s been married long enough knows this, especially if they have children, it is not rocket science 😂 or as Ross wrote “what the bible teachers teach about the matter”. Ross “ from his book” “This does not mean that one must abandon the belief in the promise of preservation in the face of variant readings. Rather, it means that one must amend their understanding of preservation to match what the Bible teachers teach about the matter.” As it appears, Ross emphasizes a nuanced view of the preservation of Scripture in light of the presence of textual “variants” of the Bible. Ross seeks too as it appears to change your or my thinking and understanding to his intellectual understanding of preservation. Another “words” Instead of thinking that God’s preservation means that every single word in every Bible translation “ variant text” has not always been exactly the same, Ross would want us to believe it means we need to accept that while there are minor differences in wording across translations, the essential message hasn’t been lost. In other words, we need to rethink what it means for God to preserve His Word- for Ross it’s more about the big picture than word-for-word perfection in the King James Holy Bible . Essentially, what Ross is saying is that God has preserved the message (not every word) of the Bible, even if some minor details differ between translations. The comment in question “Rather, it means that one must amend their understanding of preservation to match what the Bible teachers teach about the matter.” is very revealing. Instead of the focus to be on how the Bible itself speaks about God's promise of preserving His Word, we should look to the teachers of the Bible to explain the transmission process. Unfortunately, as it appears brother, Ross has got too big for his britches. I don’t claim to have full understanding as to how God preserved his word, but I simply when it’s all said and done believe that he has in the KJB. What I have seen through the years is when one gets too big for his britches they automatically resort to attacking the doctrine of preservation to promote their heretical teachings, contrary to the word of God. The way up is down… don’t forget it. I’m reminded of King Saul on how God had given him specific instructions yet Saul in his intellect, he thought better and rejected the words of the Lord. Tremble… 1 Samuel 15 10 ¶ Then came the word of the LORD unto Samuel, saying, 11 It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king: for he is turned back from following me, and hath not performed my commandments. And it grieved Samuel; and he cried unto the LORD all night. 12 And when Samuel rose early to meet Saul in the morning, it was told Samuel, saying, Saul came to Carmel, and, behold, he set him up a place, and is gone about, and passed on, and gone down to Gilgal. 13 And Samuel came to Saul: and Saul said unto him, Blessed be thou of the LORD: I have performed the commandment of the LORD. 14 ¶ And Samuel said, What meaneth then this bleating of the sheep in mine ears, and the lowing of the oxen which I hear? 15 ¶ And Saul said, They have brought them from the Amalekites: for the people spared the best of the sheep and of the oxen, to sacrifice unto the LORD thy God; and the rest we have utterly destroyed.

[@markb4261]

KJB...Acts 17:11 These were * more noble * than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. As for me I will stay with the King James Bible. Says to search the scriptures daily, doesn't say to search the Greek , Hebrew, Original Manuscripts. NO'BLE, adjective 1. Great; elevated; dignified; * being above every thing that can dishonor reputation; * as a nobel mind; a noble courage; noble deeds of valor. are trying to dishonor reputation. TheyIsaiah 55:9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

[@vernonsteinkamp1088]

I'm surprised David Reed participated in that.

[@netta96]

I'm not. And I don't mean to be ugly saying that.

[@netta96]

I'm sad that Bryan Ross is so lost in and a slave to his own carnal intellect and his carnal historical references that he cannot appreciate what the KJB is. Besides, God gives a mind-blowing amount of internal evidence that the KJB is His words. Man cannot be trusted. TAnd it takes faith. Only then can the beauty, majesty and perfection of God's words can be appreciated. He has become a wolf among us. He dropped the "s" off of "words" making it word. The "s" is the shape of the serpent. I hear hissing in his explanations and justifications. I hope and pray he sees the truth. Saying "Yeah, hath God said" can have catastropic consequences. Thank you David. I've watched all your videos pertaining to this issue and respect the diligence and integrity with which you have approached this issue.

[@jessiewilson2306]

But avid studying does provide evidence!

[@netta96]

The internal are overwhelming. But one must approach with faith. That's what Ross lacks. He leans to his own understanding.

[@TeachingChurch]

Not a fan of Ross. He thinks he’s somebody. Needs to humble himself. Maybe he should practice less like himself and more like Christ.

[@timkhan3238]

Bryan Ross has become a victim of his own intellect. He trusts so much on his logic than what the BIBLE says. Very typical to all anti-kjv Neo-Evangelicals.

[@netta96]

Exactly.