Does the Abrams X suck?

[@TheMuddleHeadedAnalyst]

Hey guys. I'm sorry about the video of the guy laughing. For some reason the editing tool I use decided to stop most of the video from being fully used.

[@oditeomnes]

I honestly think that they should consider a miniature CIWS instead of that autocannon on top of the turret. Maybe a dual system against drones and close range infantry that is some large caliber automatic shotgun or something.

[@oliver_woods4231]

GREAT VID

[@n_6scienceandengineering-q8i]

Why the Abrams X look like a lego

[@oditeomnes]

To me it looked a bit like they mounted Merkava turret on it.

[@majorcheif1176]

Merkaca mk7 😂 ​@@oditeomnes

[@JimmyShields-z2h]

Still early days with Abram X, hopefully EW against drones or better harry potter or ghosts on PS invincible blanket. I am betting man electric motor because you wont hear it coming towards you on battlefield. Would be interesting to see different size of guns on offer, if gun got destroyed or from open battlefield to close in battlefield.

[@BEANBOYOBEANITH]

no glazing, no excuses, just truth. nice work!

[@TheMuddleHeadedAnalyst]

Thankyou sir!

[@gamingsu-sauer3530]

If you want a look at what the most likely versions for the next gen of MBT's are i suggest looking at the newer german prototypes such as the Leopard 2 ARC 3.0 the KF51 U and the EMBT ADT 140. They solved the drone threat by implementing 30mm turrets capable of detecting drones with the APS radars and the shooting them down. Or in the case of the KF 51 U even having 2 types of APS.

[@TheMuddleHeadedAnalyst]

Absolutely. Also, I really love the EMBT ADT 140. it looks so cool.

[@Rukh_3547]

it amazes me that you had to put a disclaimer of 2 minutes so the nafo doesn't murder you😂

[@joaomiguelmoreira6363]

Just remember folks, propaganda goes both ways ... and you're not imune to it either

[@TheMuddleHeadedAnalyst]

Claiming that a tank in its development phase doesn't suck, or saying that these criticisms are premature isn't exactly propaganda.

[@joaomiguelmoreira6363]

​@@TheMuddleHeadedAnalyst I didnt mention the tank itself anywhere, I couldnt be less interested in a single piece prototype from a country half a world away. What I was questioning is the reasoning that so called "propaganda". He does correctly point out that external sources have an interest in manipulating your mind to serve their interests. However failing to realize that said manipulation can come from your own country in service to some very similar interests is a major oversight on your part. Expect no less from those in power than to subvert and manipulate you for their purposes. The truth is often in the middle and remember, you are not immune to propaganda my friend.

[@colincampbell767]

So let me get this straight. You're rating a tank that does not even exist as a prototype yet?

[@TheMuddleHeadedAnalyst]

Quite the opposite. If you watched the video, you would notice that I am saying that people shouldn't be rating the vehicle yet, because in the current phase of development, we don't know if it will be good or bad.

[@CoolDave-tc7hb]

Yes, The Abrams X is an ugly design and no wonder the military manufacturer decided to come out with that lousy piece of junk.