Does the moon exist when no one is looking? | Where Vedanta meets Quantum Physics | Audience FAQs

[@cooolkris]

Madam, you are supremely brilliant.. How easily you are making us understand such a complex quantam theories.. I bow down to your feet. Are you thinking of writing a book on all the videos that you have made... It will be treasure for all spiritual seekers, agnostics as well as atheists too as you are explaining all vedantic concepts with the help of science... You are truly amazing..I am pursuing spirituality for many years but this clarity is just amazing... Never before seen on KZbin videos...Dandwat Pranam 🙏🙏🙏

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you so much for your kind words. I do want to write a book sometime in the future

[@ugc1784]

I was left scratching my hair.

[@jamesjosheph3006]

I appreciate our Rishis, who wrote the Vedas. So simply narrated. A good teacher 🙏👍🌳

[@Jose-ne8hz]

This is mind blowing, you would think that particles need some form of consciousness to know that they are being observed.

[@jamesmckenzie4572]

This was surprisingly good, and I've read a lot of double-slit stuff. My understanding got a little boost out of it. Thanks. Shared.

[@saikatbaidya7928]

The quintessence of Vedanta has been elucidated in the light of Quantum Physics---Wonderfully explained by you. It's the all pervading 'Sakshi-chaitanyam' that has brougt the whole universe into existence. Thank you so much madam🙏

[@bob-c702]

These are an amazing series of science and Vedanta! Super well explained and detailed. Thank you. ❤️🙏

[@bharatenduroy6328]

For a non-physics non-academic this is the best explanation I heard. Highly intelligible & brilliant.

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you

[@tapchk]

This is the same question which took place between Prof Einstein and. Tagore when they meet during their meeting at Europe. Thanks for the video.

[@shashidharshettar3846]

You deserve a Padma Shree award for your talent to teach so simply such a complex topic

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you so much sir

[@Nadanachandran]

Best explanation I have come across. Thanks

[@hook-x6f]

Matter acts as information we all agree upon. It acts like a substrate that allows us to interact with one another spiritually.

[@keithtomey5046]

That's a good hypothesis 👍

[@narayananps774]

Wish you were my Physics teacher at Intermediate level .Most of the terms becoming clear only now on hearing you ,at 73 ! Better late than never !

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you very much sir

[@itz_me_imraan02]

I feel it also shows that the "observer " and "the observed" are somewhat the same cz it already comes to know the intention beforehand🙄

[@subramanianganesh9924]

This means that the conscious chaitanyam in us conceives the moon which exists as waves but is perceived as particle by us....as anollogy. Have l understood.

[@devikabhide6579]

If particles are conscious and they understand whether someone is going to observe them or not. Then they should always appear as a particle on the second slide. As the second slide is placed there intentionally. Can you please elaborate more on this? I have become a huge fan of yours. Your explanations are amazing and very interesting. Thank you 😊

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you

[@isaac1572]

@@templesbooksandscience8697 Not answering this question proves that this entire video is nonsense. You have repeated lies that you heard somewhere else without realising the they are bullshit.

[@prasadgarimalla1780]

Great question Devika. Let us wait to hear the clarification. And Isaac, please desist from instantly judging 'non responses' here. Let us have some patience...people are busy and not always available at your beck and call.

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Particles are not conscious. It is the consciousness of the observer that brings them into existence. Just like your dream, whatever you see in your dream exists what you don't see does not exist. It does not mean that they are waiting for you to see them. They just don't exist when you don't see them

[@devanshudesperado]

@@templesbooksandscience8697 may be atman and anatman logic applies here. Particles are non-self, observer is self.

[@mvvsmurthy1]

Your explanation is simply amazing. Thank you 🙏

[@anbukkarasimanoharan775]

Wow. Very nicely explained.

[@somrajdutta8366]

Mindblowing. Your explanations are super easy to understand. Only goes to show how deeply you understand your subject. Thank You.

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

thank you

[@mangeshwalewadikar9410]

According to Buddhist philosophy conciousness is a result of inanimate particles coming together. So it is possible to collapse a wave function. Copenhegan interpretation is simillar to drishti srushtiwada. Material interpretation is drishti srishti wada. Both wadas fall under maya. Observer and observed are maya. Advaita's maya is not concious. Conciousness might be material but sentinence is not material. A distinction has to be made between these two. Advaita's truth lies beyond observer and observed. Life might not be same as conciousness.

[@KhushiKumari-wh4jl]

The best video of my entire youtube history of 7years…. If you understand it deeply with scientific mind and good spiritual consciousness… Thankyou for making this, it will help so many with so many ways in their deferent journeys…

[@oln3678]

Incredible... my mind is blown 🤯

[@shantanuaphale3966]

Excellent explanation of experiment 👍🏽

[@Nvh_401]

Summary: Thank you for your response Ma’am. I have not read that book. Look forward to reading that. Having read the links in description, however, they don’t conclude nor indicate consciousness driven outcomes. The study simply re-affirm Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Hello Ma’am. Ecstatic to learn you take feedback from community. Thank you! 8:22 to answer your question: the screen is essential to the output of the experiment while the camera isn’t. Therefore, the screen is part of the experiment where the act of “detection” is causing an interference pattern. Now, the camera is an additional variable introduced into the experiment: therefore the experiment is now changed. As explained earlier, the act of measurement itself is causing disturbances in the system. Here is a thought experiment for you: would you see an interference pattern if the camera is off? Edit: Version 3 expt set up: can you please cite the source?

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

I read it in the book Biocentrism by Robert Lanza. I have given the references in the description of the video

[@Nvh_401]

@@templesbooksandscience8697 could you please tell me the page number where you found the version 3 please?

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

@@Nvh_401 I am not sure which version of the book you have. In my book it is the 78th page. Quoting the line to help you locate, " lets destroy our ability to measure the which way path of the s photons withoug interfering with them in any way..."

[@rognex]

"Truth is stranger that fiction", amazing video mam, Can you please make a video about anahad naad also known as "The sound of silence" and explain why I hear it and what is its reality.

[@HemPat56]

Thanks for asking, I too would love to hear that :-)

[@Rkk153]

Incredible. Very nicely explained in simple manner. Thank you for the video.

[@positivity20]

Amazing video..the conclusion matches with vedanta..because nature is nature of a conscious Super soul. So all particles are indeed being observed.. Also another corollary could be this perhaps supports the theory of " things manifest as we think"..

[@vskanchi5092]

Very lucid presentation of rather complex experiments. Kudos. You are doing a wonderful job. The Higher Education Institutions need teachers like you. Unfortunately that is not the case in a typical HEI environment.

[@vinayakumarbvk]

Superb and simple explanation for the double slit experiment. Kudos 🙏

[@chandandigumarthy9652]

Wow! Great findings by Rishis, Great findings scientists by Scientists and Great presentation by you .. this proves we are indeed in a great company in this existence all the time

[@LVasudev]

Incredibly fascinating and so very well explained! But the question below whether the particle itself is a conscious entity, deserves to be answered.

[@asj12sonu]

नमो नमः 🙏 Thankyou so much for explaining this complex experiment so beautifully. Really admire your video and passion for Non Dualism and Physics.

[@devanshudesperado]

No could explain this on YT as u did. Perhaps because others dont have the vedantic edge like you. Simply mind blowing. Intent is the key. Karma is also judged on intent, not the actual action.

[@kissoonkissoon1355]

I have been watching your videos and am convinced that you are blessed with the ability to impart knowledge of complex subjects in the most lucid ways. I am amazed at your profound knowledge of science and philosophy. You make me proud of my Indian origin

[@aaronuv]

In other words, as I'm sitting in my room watching this, the world outside doesn't exist.🤯

[@KiranKumar-tq6tr]

Awesome, mam! keep uploading such an amazing informative videos about science and Advaita. 🕉🙏

[@amudharamesh]

Simple yet brilliant explanation. Keep the good work going 🙏

[@selfwitnessing]

Observation is not enough space for a particle's existence. ❤❤❤ There must be an experienced witness taking experience from that particle for anything in the classical world.

[@antonydsouza1484]

This universe is awesome. This life is awesome. Awesome is your explanation.

[@yogione72]

thanks for this. my opinion is -(entanglement) if two particles are separated with long distance and if one is observed then it is as good as other is also getting observed instantaneously (in no time), because all are connected with one energy. So if I am ( or any person) observing any part of earth, that means earth is being observed , because of entanglement (connected with one energy), if very tiny part of earth is getting observed it is as good as moon is also getting observed (though not directly) . So according to this Moon exist though we are not looking at it directly, But we are looking at earth (or any part of earth, or human being etc), which are entangled and connected with each other by one energy. So moon has to behave like particles though we are not looking to it directly. But we are looking at tiny part of earth (land , mountains etc. of arth) which are energetically bounded and entangled. And this applies to whole universe. If we are looking our image in mirror, it is as good as whole universe is being observed. So it behaves like particles. (Aham Brahmasmi)

[@councilof9project748]

Same simple answer on the moon. In duality we state that left and right arise at the same time. There is no up without down, no in without out etc. So with the observer and the observed or the 'I' and the 'world'. If there is an object, there must be a subject, an experiencer creates an experience, an observer the observed. Duality is the way 'things' seemingly appear although there is nothing there. So when there seemed to appear something, there must be someone to look at it, anyone, due to dualism. Key here is that humans think there is a 'untouchable' 'I' as in 'I' exist. Existence, life nor consciousness know of any 'I'. The' 'I' is relative and temporarily only to allow 'awareness'. There is only source, as there is no one beyond Brahman, the invisible. 'I' is no source but comes forth from Brahman. Brahman is. 'I' is part of Brahman but Brahman is not part of any 'I'. So again Vedanta is right. Thx.

[@extemporaneous4545]

Brahman is a part of all and every "I". Brahman and the "I" are not separate. There is no "I", but then there is, as much as there is no Brahman, but then there is when he creates an "I" to experience himself. Because without the numerous "I"s, Brahman would not exist, because there would be no other to verify his existence. And the other is created by himself to prove to himself that he exists. It's all a game he's playing with himself, really. Solitaire, anyone? Now you can't really say that, can you?

[@krishnas2088]

Thank you 🙏 nobody can make it so incredibly clear 👍👍

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you

[@meenalbapat9770]

Fantastic…..pl keep enlightening all of us. God bless you for your work.

[@vagvarsh]

I have never seen such a clarity in explanation of such a complex physics. Great🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@s.d.0]

fantastic vdo Mam. beautifully explained.

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you

[@sujat9549]

Dear Archana'ji, Your work continues to impress and offer extremely useful explanations for all, and for seekers of Truth in particular. This post is clinically and brilliantly executed. Your clarity of Advaita as well as the depth of your research in modern objective science are evident. This should leave no trace of doubt about the fact that it is the mind-body medium which "creates" the objective Universe - rather, the appearance of forms. And that because what is perceived is a distortion of reality, it is merely an appearance of something which does not "exist" as it appears. And that therefore, each and every objectively perceivable form, howsoever empirical, is necessarily an illusion . There is no objective existence and no objective form; there is only activity.... only happening! The only existence is the Subject. Keep up the useful work! 😊 Warmly, sujat

[@debajyotiroy3196]

Madam i likes to watch & listen & feel spiritual knowledge..ur video with scientific data raise hope & confidence within me.......pls make an elaborate video on observer only

[@bhaanutejaavengala7936]

Am I the only one who feels lucky to hear this delightful explanation?!

[@paulorrmorais3697]

Marvelous video! Congratulations for your intelligence uniting spirituality and science!!!

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

🙏

[@debajyotiroy3196]

My god ! Madam this is ur best post...I salute to ur effort ( intention)😮

[@star07in]

wow, maam you are super brilliant. thanks for this amazing video. 🙏

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

So nice of you

[@councilof9project748]

The answer is simple and is not based on quantum mechanics if I may. When there is a boat that sails on the ocean and you make a picture of the boat, you will 'measure' a boat like you measure a particle. It shows on the picture. When you 'measure' its speed you measure the abstract speed, no picture of the boat, only the 'behavior of the water' or speed.' or its wave function'. Thus the boat is the boat or the particle and the speed is the speed or the wave phenomenon. The boat is not the speed, it has a speed. There is no direct link between the boat and its speed nor the particle with the waves/water.

[@rajendradharmadhikari5672]

Amazing and very simplistic explanation of quantum physics. Thank you so much. Pls share more video's on the same subject.

[@michaeldillon3113]

Brilliant video and as clear an explanation as is possible. 40 years ago when I read the words of Sri Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi that the mind and the world arise together I thought He was expressing spiritual ideas . Turns out He was a giant of quantum physics as well as a giant of Vedantic philosophy. E=🕉️

[@souravghosh7558]

Wow, such brilliant explanation. You r such a brilliant mind Maam

[@keithtomey5046]

So...(and I've actually done this little experiment with my sons 😁)...when you put a video camera (eg. phone) inside a fridge to see if the light does indeed go off when the door is shut (and it does go off), it doesn't necessarily mean that the light goes off when you shut the door when there isn't a video camera recording in there...😁 (Dot)

[@rognex]

If the particle knows that it is going to be observed doesn't it proves that the particle is conscious itself..? Because to know something first of all we have to be a conscious being.

[@prashantkumarm7196]

It is "as if" they are going to be observed

[@rognex]

@@prashantkumarm7196 This "as if" is still a mystry bro, but biocentrism theory tries to explain that conscious act of observation itself creates the reality. I am amazed by the intellect of our rishis, in that time how were they able to know these things without any advanced scientific equipment to do experiments and conclude a result?

[@extemporaneous4545]

@@rognex You could look at it another way -- that everything is predestined, everything is preprogrammed, so the particle is just doing what was written for it to do, and the 'observer' was just going to observe because it was written that the time for him to observe was during the event, or after the event, whatever that particular case might be. Nobody consciously "knows" anything, everybody including the humans and the particles are just automatons only able to perform the functions already written out for them.

[@rognex]

@@extemporaneous4545 no, I have free will at least in the form of illusion.

[@sanjaynaik9065]

I listen and see this video again and again. Very strange matter (!) indeed.

[@o8944]

Excellent explanation mam. Thank you for making this video specifically to answer my question. 🙏

[@DrPrabuddhaGhanshyam]

I was not aware of later experiments in the series. Thanks for this. But saying the result is as per viewer's imagination like in dream is not an explanation. An equipment cannot imagine. All conscious viewers also cannot imagine same result. Please clarify.

[@keithtomey5046]

It looks as if our individual consciousnesses may be linked. You've heard of mass hallucinations, right..? 😊 (Dot)

[@dash0011]

You explained it beautifully.

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you 🙂

[@muhandiram88]

What is the definition of a 'particle' ???

[@FactsByPankaj]

I will definitely buy the book wherever you publish in future amazing

[@ruchikasingh3520]

I watched so many videos but this was simple to understand to this amazing minblowing phenomenon.

[@thrineshwaramysorer7463]

Madam, thanks for sharing this wonderful video. You mentioned that it is the animate entity, which is also conscious, responsible for the wave function to collapse but not mere detector. Because, the intention to observe is the important factor here. My curiosity is that when we place a plant or an animal as the observer what would happen. Should the wave function appear because a plant or an animal cannot record it even though they are animate entities? Thanks.

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Scientists are still grappling with this. Since the ability to measure is an important criteria any entity which cannot observe will not result in the collapse of the wave function. That is my understanding

[@thrineshwaramysorer7463]

@@templesbooksandscience8697 Thanks , that is what I too expected because a plant or an animal may not have an intention to observe. Now, coming back to the original question of the moon, should we conclude that if one does not observe it it cannot exist for him? In that case, what if somebody, unknown to us, who would have observed the moon makes an announcement that he saw the moon and should we accept him and change our stand that the moon existed even though we had not observed? Is this phenomenon hard connected to a particular observer only but not to a collective entity, say the mankind? Thanks.

[@thrineshwaramysorer7463]

One more question: In version 5 of the above experiment the observer is placed far away from the double-slit apparatus. Since we are dealing with the motion of electrons or photons the experiment would get over in a vey short period. Hence if we want to observe after the experiment is over then there must be sufficient time available, which is possible by placing the observer very far like several thousand KM away, to be precise. Is this the case or is there any other way of experimenting? Thanks.

[@thrineshwaramysorer7463]

"Nothing is real , until one observes it". What is the meaning of 'real' here? Anything our thought may conceptualize could be considered as real. But, the truth may be entirely different. right? For example, when we look at a tree and call it a tree our perception and conceptualization are governed by our prior knowledge about the tree and hence it is dependent upon the name 'tree' assigned to that object seen. So, how can we consider what we see is the truth about that object? Because, the term 'tree' may give us a rather limited understanding of the object. SO, in order to know the truth, our observation must be totally free from all prejudices or simply the knowledge that we have prior to observation. What do you say? Thanks.

[@keithtomey5046]

​@@thrineshwaramysorer7463In a particular sense the Moon (and everything else) *does* exist...in a similar way that virtual computer worlds "exist". We "spend" our lives "interacting" with these "existing" entities.

[@ravisankar1581]

Maam this explanation clearly mirrors my experience as a pyschic. Quatum Physics can be usd to determine the fiuture shape of events. if more reseach is done. Only what is missing is how would qauntum physics be able to control the waves when not observed. I have laways maintained that all knowledge is in the air one only need to grasp it. Technically every one can become an einstein but what preevents it is the unciousmovement is blinded as only very very few can mirror like a transparent wll and see what others cannot see.

[@keithtomey5046]

"Many a rose is born to blush unseen and waste it's sweetness on the desert air." (Thomas Gray). People's creativity - apart from that of a very few - is constrained by oppressive humans. (Dot)

[@kamalkumarattinagaramu8065]

Superb explanation

[@imeanand]

Madam.. Its not only Observer or medium or what is observed decides it exist or not. Even if i couldn't see, the particle will exist based on other senses(touch or smell etc).. Example - I can be blind, But by touching the Apple I know its exist.

[@keithtomey5046]

To be an observer is inclusive of all senses. (Dot)

[@srinivasamurthytanguturi9346]

🙏🌷We are grateful to you madam!! No words to thank you!!

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you

[@rajl9473]

You are amazing and very good explanation

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you! 😃

[@Janardhanpersonal]

You are worlds best scientist and realized being combination

[@ashokchorge6954]

AWESOME!

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you

[@drvenugopaldoddaballapurra7040]

Why Vedas didn't invent the system of vedio conference?

[@miriamocean6776]

Could this be our thoughts and the intention of our subconscious thinking 🤔 or conscious 🤔

[@sitaramar13]

Aristotle was a famous philosopher 2000 years back. He was also a scientist, though probably he was not called at that time. He gave some ideas about the way how universe works. Two thousand years later , great scientists galelio and newton changed Aristotle's ideas based on experimental data observed on stars and planets at that time. In 1900s , great scientist einstein modified newtons laws, based on some more experimental data on electricity and magnetism. During same time , another scientist hesenberg derived a law of universe called uncertainty principle based on experimental data. The great scientist einstein didn't accept hesenberg law and gave his famous statement god doesn't play dice. In spite of great genius of century einstein not accepting hesenberg law , scientific community accepted and went ahead with it. This is how modern science evolved and still evolving to unravel nature of universe and technologists and even medical industry using those laws to give us confort and health.

[@Elias-Liv]

So a physical manifestation of consciousness is needed for observation. Who is the original observer?

[@thethirdenergy8152]

Consciousness itself is the original observer but it happens through physical eyes

[@Elias-Liv]

@thethirdenergy8152 consciousness needs a physical manifestation to make an observation throw, otherwise, static objects would be measuring reality. I think my question is the same as asking what was before the big bang, who created God if he is the creator as the Bible says, etc... I am hoping that Hindus Vedanta have an answer, who/what/how was the first physical manifestation of consciousness that made the first observation?

[@extemporaneous4545]

@@Elias-Liv There never was "a physical manifestation". It is all a dream happening in the mind of Consciousness. This is the Hindu viewpoint. You are taking this physical manifestation to be "real" because you are within the video game. You cannot see that you and everything around you are just pixels on a moving screen.

[@enochzorba4082]

You are ❤❤❤doing the great job thank you

[@templesbooksandscience8697]

Thank you

[@andruss2001]

Thanks! Please update the facts: the experiment nr5 (quantum eraser) has been proven to be false. But you can use John Wheeler's Delayed Choice experiment, instead of quantum eraser. It works, as I know.

[@HemPat56]

Thank you 🙏🙂

[@FactsByPankaj]

Thank you so much thank you so much for your all efforts and Lots of love ❤️❤️❤️

[@DawnZimmermann]

Truly astounding

[@lilliburlero1]

I did not get it how the human observers (whether with a "thing to measure" or not) got the results about something that they were not supposed to have seen (which they could have not have seen or measured because they still measured, observed and "knew" in the end)? 🤔Without the logical explanation (not just leaving the impression like it has been "proven" 🤩) it's just a nice belief and intention to connect both "worlds" (scientific findings and beliefs) but not really connecting them. I'm surprised how few commenters have actually followed this explanation in the clip... or am I the only fool here who doesn't get it? Maybe 🤨(and then I truly admit it!) But I'd never stop asking questions when it's not clear yet.. I was already glad that I've found somebody trying to put these worlds together but I didn't find here logical proof 😭I would be grateful if you could explain it with few sentences or another clip 🙏

[@sudimama4095]

Madam could U please explain what Observation is

[@dvpjal]

Ma'am are you the author of any book/s if yes, let me know the books and if not then I suggest you to ...

[@vish2553]

Brilliant, thank you ji🙏

[@niskarshdwivedi1549]

Mam, I have a question... In Advaita vedanta, there is not many conscious beings but only one... That conscious being is Brahman or Atman.. Appearing conscious beings are Jiva. By whom this wave function collapse is happening ? Jiva aur Atma? Is it possible that wave function collapse is happening because of only 1 conscious being.. who is the Brahman alone..?

[@satishacu-healer2591]

Thanks. It is of much help.

[@زينبالهنداوي-ع5و]

Where can I read about version3?

[@priy6241]

This is brilliant 👏 👌

[@bhardwajchandru9725]

ब्रह्म सत्यं जगन्मिथ्या जीवो ब्रह्मैव नापरः । अनेन वेद्यं सच्छास्त्रमिति वेदान्तडिण्डिमः ॥ ब्रह्म वास्तविक है, ब्रह्मांड मिथ्या है (इसे वास्तविक या असत्य के रूप में वर्गीकृत नहीं किया जा सकता है)। जीव ही ब्रह्म है और भिन्न नहीं। इसे सही शास्त्र के रूप में समझा जाना चाहिए। यह वेदांत द्वारा घोषित किया गया है। Brahman is real, the universe is mithya (it cannot be categorized as either real or unreal). The jiva is Brahman itself and not different. This should be understood as the correct Sastra. This is proclaimed by Vedanta. Source - ब्रह्मज्ञानावलीमाला

[@sdutta8]

This question was asked by Einstein (in a different form) to poet, Rabindranath Tagore, who claimed, based on the perspective of Indian philosophy, that it wouldn’t exist. This was because observation, which is an act of our consciousness, is fundamentally a subject, not an objective, process. Einstein insisted that it WOULD exist. Later, Heisenberg told Tagore that familiarity with the Upanishad made it easier to accept Quantum Mechanics.

[@extemporaneous4545]

Einstein was after all a scared little monotheist at heart.

[@sdutta8]

@@extemporaneous4545 I think that rather than poly- or mono-theism, this is about believing whether the universe and the observer are ultimately one. That is NOT the Biblical view but asserted by not only the Vedic religions but also Sufi Islam, Gnostic Christianity and other ancient creeds.

[@bhuvaneswarinatarajan2583]

Mind blowing ma'am ❤

[@kaavyasri2705]

Reflection of light is the chief phenomenon to occur to view any object whose size larger than wavelength of light incident/reflected. On "no moon day", does it mean "moon is not there"? Secondly, even a blind can visualise presence of Moon just by imagination or after hearing wonderful song or chanting or words (from a poet). So, object is real but experiencing its presence need not be real always. Same rule valid for God. Many or at least a few experienced God just like seeing a moon on "no moon day". Consciousness is in fact a specific state of body where brain mainly in 100% awaken state. For example, many of us often experience "absence of a well known object lying on table/bed though it is there". This is mainly due to temporary distortion of brain from viewing specific object or state of mind is in different conscious state. So, matter whether real or not, one can visualise based on imagination. This might be the reason why "we feel so sad when any near or dear departs from us". In fact, though physically the person non-existing, yet, consciousness never allows the same to extinct.

[@sanjayPrasad-kc5qc]

What does the QUANTUM universe isn't locally real mean?, please clarify.

[@SonnyKanchin]

In this video, you mention the idea that a conscious observer is required for a particle to make an appearance, which is an interpretation of the observer effect in quantum mechanics. However, it is important to note that this interpretation is not universally accepted among physicists. An alternative explanation is decoherence, which occurs when a quantum system interacts with its environment. This interaction causes the wave function to collapse into a definite state without the need for a conscious observer. Decoherence is currently the more widely accepted explanation for the collapse of the wave function.The interpretation of quantum mechanics remains an ongoing topic of debate and research in the scientific community. While the observer effect is an interesting concept, it's essential to consider the various perspectives and interpretations within the field of quantum mechanics.

[@keithtomey5046]

How do you explain the detector-result-scrambled then please..?

[@ugc1784]

The deep knowledge contained in the Vedanta means nothing to you if you dont have some scientific knowledge to compare. I mean the more scientific knowledge you have, the better you understand the substance of the teachings of Vedanta.

[@FactsByPankaj]

You amaze me really ...really amazing yr 😂

[@soumitrakulkarni]

Please read explanation

[@jayantkapatker5070]

When you observe the moon, it appears in its particle form. When you do not observe the moon, it remains in its wave form. As quantum physics says every object in the universe must have a particle and a wave property. The question is where does the wave part reside. The surprising answer is that the wave part remains in the mind. It is the vrittis as Vedanta teaches. In presence of the observer within you, the wave part collapses to become the particle. An observer is necessary for the particle form, otherwise it remains in the waveform.

[@simonooi2544]

So the conclusion is as expected. All phenomenal only exist when there is a conscious observer otherwise it never happen. Anything may occur but it's irrelevant. You can shine a special spectrum of light into my house through the window since I am sleeping or not at home, to me it never exist. You can tell me or send a message telling me about it and if I never seen such light before I couldn't imagine anything so I registered nothing.

[@rajasekarkunjithapatham7021]

Thanks dear 💕

[@sitaramar13]

A question to physics students. What are the most fundamental particles of the human body?