As an aircraft mechanic, one thing really sticks out like a sore thumb and that is the question where does it store it's fuel, assuming it runs on jet fuel at all. Aircraft store most, it not all, their fuel in their wings and this thing has its wing internal spaces taken up by lift engines.
@Im-mv6bf4 жыл бұрын
plot tanks
@alderwolf76874 жыл бұрын
@@Im-mv6bf Apparently I guess. Very reliable and work's every time without the hassle of answering questions like this. Would be nice if it worked in real life because, while rarely required, fuel cell maintenance can be a pain in the @ss.
@r01d24 жыл бұрын
since they have Arc Reactor, they say it's like a nuclear reactor but AA-size, maybe that's the "cheat device" we don't have
@alderwolf76874 жыл бұрын
@@Laputsky That would be a good guess but engines are thirsty things and that storage would probably be insufficient for anything more than 30 to 45 minutes flight time unless you actively attempt to conserved fuel which they don't in the films.
@macgyveratlarge21334 жыл бұрын
Seems that the wing roots are plenty large enough for at least 7000 lbs of fuel, and possibly more space for fuel around the fuselage. Drop tanks would be a great addition , but I never saw any.
@mikiroony4 жыл бұрын
"While the Quinjet may struggle a superhuman riding a Harley". Best burn of the video :D
@pyeitme5084 жыл бұрын
It is LOL! 😂
@tjpprojects71924 жыл бұрын
struggle "against" a superhuman
@hudson_powell4 жыл бұрын
Do the Zephyr One from Agents of SHIELD!
@thayerfogerson21864 жыл бұрын
Yes pls
@luisacuna83154 жыл бұрын
A must!
@noobmaster6ix94 жыл бұрын
and the bus!
@dreadwing014 жыл бұрын
Ryan Cobalt thank you for reading my mind.
@nesoprimus9304 жыл бұрын
Yes Please do the zephyr one from agents of shield
@Colonel_Overkill4 жыл бұрын
The F-35 used by SHIELD is even so amazing that it can fire autocannon shells out of the jet air intake vents instead of the actual gun port or cannon hardpoints....
@uk16444 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@boymahina1234 жыл бұрын
Not to mention all VTOL attack/fighter aircraft have weapons disabled in VTOL mode for safety reasons.
@Utubesuperstar3 жыл бұрын
@@boymahina123 yeah they took a direct page from that shitty diehard movie that did it even worse
@flawer13162 жыл бұрын
@@boymahina123 Battlefield 4
@bagenius5970 Жыл бұрын
@@boymahina123 I would assume that S.H.I.E.L.D.'s F-35s are modified to suit their needs. They are an extra-governmental organization, not a branch of the military. They pretty much operate in their own set of rules and regulations, so they can do this if they want/need to.
@r01d24 жыл бұрын
I still liking the Quinjet 2012 more than AOU Quinjet, because AOU Quinjet design-wise looks like a generic sci-fi ship and Quinjet 2012 is more tacticool
@juancruzmarolda77264 жыл бұрын
I completely agree, the original quinjet feels more real or possible
@TheTattorack4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, well, that's what you get when you let Stark design all your shit.
@simpleisbetter41324 жыл бұрын
They should have built another "Bus".
@lukecody37854 жыл бұрын
@@simpleisbetter4132 too bad it was used as a decoy and shot down in season 3
@JonatasAdoM3 жыл бұрын
That's the MCU in a nutshell. Started boots on reality, trying to make sense and now you have nanobots making everything shrink and reform by magic. In a way it reminds me of Xcom designs. The first reboot made a lot of sense, while the sequel feels like a it tales place in the Marvel universe.
@zenkaiangel9774 жыл бұрын
9:20 having to be able to successfully crash land as part of the test to get your license is actually pretty badass 🐅
@gateauxq46044 жыл бұрын
That was amazing and terrifying to watch. Doing that in a combat situation would definitely warrant a medal! I wonder if Senator Duckworth got one. She kind of did land like that with the minor inconvenience of having had a missile fired through the ship.
@guts-1412 жыл бұрын
A game that rewards an achievement for having a safe crash landing for a helicopter that I know of was Rising Storm 2 Vietnam
@LordBloodraven4 жыл бұрын
F-35: "Cheaper than the Quinjet and could be used for interception and air-to-air combat." Not very effective against a giant green rage monster.
@0623kaboom4 жыл бұрын
major fall back of the f35 ... single engine .. no modern fighter goes that route for lack of redundancy and staying power in the action ... the f35 takes engine damage it has to leave .. anything else can stay a bit longer ... the f35 is nothing but a test bed for other technology now and not worth it's weight in the hype it has been given ... it has more troubles than boat with a mesh screen hull ...
@LordBloodraven4 жыл бұрын
@@0623kaboom Okay, there's a lot to unpack here. First, there are still *modern*, single-engine jet fighters like General Dynamic's F-16, the Mitsubishi F-2, and the Mirage 2000, all of which are still in active service. Second, even losing one engine on a twin-engine jet fighter is disastrous. The loss of thrust combined with drag makes even the most basic combat maneuvers liable to tear the airframe apart. (Yeah, TopGun was full of bullshit.) Third, the F-35's various technologies have already been implemented before in other aircraft. The stealth technology on an aerodynamic frame was proven with the F-22, the internal rotary missile launchers has been around since the F-117, and the VTOL technology successfully debuted with the Harrier. The novelty of the F-35 is that they have *Assembled* it all together in a single craft. Lastly, a better insult would have been "Screen door on a submarine."
@schrombomb4 жыл бұрын
@@0623kaboom single engine isn't a problem for an aircraft that can stay hidden and engage at the distance it can. not to mention the crazy networking between them basically giving fully automated sitrep for hundreds of miles around a target/battle and feeds it to all the commanders around. people that fly them have changed their tune quite a bit over the past few years.
@ranwolf76504 жыл бұрын
not many things are
@m1a1abramstank494 жыл бұрын
0623kaboom Uhh, JAS 39, Rafale, F-21, that sounds bullshit honestly. And how is it supposed to take damage if it can’t even be spotted? And I’d it is hit let’s say on a 2 engine aircraft, wouldn’t that still be an immediate RTB sign? Too bad it does great in NATO exercises and performs like a good dogfighter
@NateSceneTV4 жыл бұрын
The Quin Jet sees a ton of action in Agents of Shield. Super underrated sci-fi show. They also feature a ship called The Zephyr, which is basically a Quin Jet mother-ship and areal command center as well as starship Edit: Glad it got featured in the video!
@dannyr29764 жыл бұрын
Super underrated show, indeed (didn't care for season 6 personally) but the level of visual effects on a TV budget is astonding!
@ShadeSlayer19114 жыл бұрын
Too bad it became The Daisy Show as the seasons went on.
@dannyr29764 жыл бұрын
@@ShadeSlayer1911 For me, the 'Framework' episodes were shear perfection!
@NateSceneTV4 жыл бұрын
@@dannyr2976 Radcliff's death was poetry
@kephessthedying59424 жыл бұрын
Time travel ship:)
@morlath47674 жыл бұрын
You missed the "and Air to Hulk combat" quip when using the scene from Avengers of Hulk jumping at the plane. I love these videos and please keep them coming!
@robstone45374 жыл бұрын
Yeah that scene where an F35 has muzzle flashes from both sides when an F35 only has a single cannon on the leftside. And the Vtol version shown does not even have an internal gun, it has an external gun pod.
@miles23784 жыл бұрын
@@robstone4537 and the CG model was not even corect.
@0623kaboom4 жыл бұрын
@@robstone4537 yeah and people think that single engine plane is good .. it can hover in one setup but not fly fast with it optiomized for hover .. and cant hover when optomized for flight .. and cant be optomized in real time ... it requires ground work to do it ... the f35 is just a flying test bed ... it stopped being a viable fighter as soon as it had to be hard reset to use either flight mode
@davidshanley5584 жыл бұрын
Glad you mentioned the broken wing award, we had two apache pilots in my unit get these. It was great they survived.
@simpleisbetter41324 жыл бұрын
Honestly, that is great thing. It's tough enough losing buddies. Besides there are no posthumous Broken Wing awards.
@ronniehopper27264 жыл бұрын
Jets and planes cut through the air helicopters on the other hand just beat it into submission
@backdraft9164 жыл бұрын
Ronnie Hopper THAT’S the comment I was looking for!!
@0623kaboom4 жыл бұрын
well actually jet planes get sucked through the air actually ... the high speed air over the top of the wing creates a vaccuum causing lift so essentially a plane gets sucked into the air ... . helicopters are like lazy women who dont do anything ... the man does all the work (the rotor) while the rest just sits there and goes along for the ride ...
@SamvedIyer4 жыл бұрын
@@0623kaboom Feminists incoming in 3,2,1......
@biblebot39473 жыл бұрын
@@SamvedIyer not misogynists coming in 3...2.....1.......
@mikewaterfield35993 жыл бұрын
they do not cut, they soar, A helo is nothing more than a conglomeration of moving parts desperate to get away from each other held aloft by the third axiom of the aviator. "in thrust we trust"
@sigmar23314 жыл бұрын
A F-35 flying troop transport with cloaking tech
@somebody72054 жыл бұрын
What's better than that
@newsaxonyproductions78714 жыл бұрын
Alan's breakdown of the Quinjet makes it sound like, at least to me, the galaxy-class starship from Star Trek. The way it uses power and thrust instead of aerodynamics seems very similar. I think Generation Films should do a video about the Lions from Voltron: Legendary Defender. I want to see what scientific explanations Alan can come up with.
@0623kaboom4 жыл бұрын
just with 4 more engines that actually work as intended unlike the single engine f35 jet test bed .... as of now it isnt good for anything else
@newsaxonyproductions78714 жыл бұрын
*aerodynamics to move is *Galaxy-class starship
@m0hamed_kamz704 жыл бұрын
...which is also a spaceship and a submarine...wth🤯
@L0stEngineer4 жыл бұрын
As an aerospace engineer, I have to unfortunately inform you that the quinjet is a physical impossibly. There is no metal on Earth that has that stiffness, yield strength and lightness known to man. There is also no fuel, short of an unshielded compact nuclear reactor, with that much power density to be able to boost that heavy craft into space. It just can't exist. However, if Congress is willing to authorize a multibillion dollar development contract, my company will be happy to spend it for you.
@danamoore17884 жыл бұрын
Pardon a moment. But this universe has people like Tony Stark who make flying suits of armour that can take tank rounds. And this was him borrowing the metallurgy from a satellite project as I recall. So stiff yet light weight seems to be there. Shield also seems unimpressed with the miniature arc reactor. As though they already had one. So perhaps they are at least partially powered in this manner? They really don't get into the nuts a bolts of how it works.
@georgedang4494 жыл бұрын
These superhero flicks are for people who don't think about things, not for you. You should watch The Expanse.
@martinhanke16704 жыл бұрын
it's comics, so relax.
@fred63194 жыл бұрын
@@georgedang449 except the decks from the Roci don't match the exterior
@rickyheath76074 жыл бұрын
*sniff* *sniff* Grumman is that you?
@barrybend71894 жыл бұрын
The quinjet is ok but the Pelican from Halo is better.
@Blue-Gold_Crusader4 жыл бұрын
The question that I'd like answered is: would both of them actually be able to fly in atmosphere? I'd love to see a wind tunnel test (among others) on both vehicles to determine whether or not both designs could even work in atmo.
@johnverick-smith97944 жыл бұрын
@@Blue-Gold_Crusader Quinjet maybe Pelican definitely not. The wings are too short to provide lift instead it has downward facing VTOL thrusters and the rear dual thrusters can swivel/vector to provide further lift and control. Watch the Installation 00 pelican breakdown for more information.
@generaljimmies34294 жыл бұрын
Does the Arwing(Arrow Wing)design from Star Fox make sense? Mk1 Arwing(SNES Star Fox) Mk2 Arwing(Star Fox 64) Mk2 Arwing Zero(Star Fox Zero), this includes the Black Armor variant(More firepower but less shield strength) Mk3 Arwing(Star Fox Assault)
@colekenney29654 жыл бұрын
@@johnverick-smith9794 I heard the first models of the pelican (the bungie series) actually could work aerodynamically. Its body as a whole generated lift when in flight while the vtol jets were for hovering and low speed maneuvers. The problem is we dont actually have a fuel that would work. Or engines probably. But that's sci-fi stuff anyway. I'm more interested in the aerodynamics actually working because sci-fi can wave fingers and say 500 years of better rocketry.
@ln79293 жыл бұрын
@@colekenney2965 I think most of the unsc vehicles in halo use cold fusion engines
@marsrocket4 жыл бұрын
Tony can survive literally falling out of the sky in the Iron Man suit; I doubt a bit of maneuvering would cause someone in that world to black out. The must have some kind of inertial dampers.
@ky1ebetts3 жыл бұрын
Hey as long as they keep the blinker fluid topped off, they should be fine.
@weskersification4 жыл бұрын
"The helicopter Is a flying brick"
@carlbruschnigjr17574 жыл бұрын
As a friend of mine put it, "A weird collection of aviation parts loosely traveling in the same general direction." He was a helicopter design engineer.
@ky1ebetts3 жыл бұрын
So would a 747 be a cinder-block?
@Frost-014 жыл бұрын
i just noticed in every movie they always portray the fighter jets as having dual guns when they actually dont and only have 1 gun
@johnverick-smith97944 жыл бұрын
The placement is also very wrong. They would never put a weapon system in the engine intakes. That's a lot of work to make that work.
@tntproductions19964 жыл бұрын
@@johnverick-smith9794 I'm assuming the varient in the movie is an F-35B, so no internal cannons. While the F-35B can mount a gun pod, it still does not have an internal cannon. Only the A varient can mount an internal cannon.
@Knightfang14 жыл бұрын
TnT Productions right? I can’t believe so many people miss this fact. The F-35A has a 25mm cannon above its right wing root. The B and C models carry a 25mm cannon in an external gun pod mounted under the fuselage. However the Airforce has been having problems with the internal cannon on the F-35. It’s accuracy is questionable and it’s been cracking it’s mounting brackets
@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM4 жыл бұрын
Also every fighter jet, for some reason, needs be shown, with its afterburner engaged.
@SodaPopin5ki4 жыл бұрын
And you never see aelerons or elevators move.
@petersmythe64624 жыл бұрын
Ok, some problems I notice: 1. First and foremost: 3 reasonably sized afterburning turbofans or even turboramjets would have considerable difficulty getting it to its stated airbreathing top speed of mach 2.1. The airframe doesn't appear to follow the Whitcomb area rule well at all and is pretty chubby. So at sea level it might not even break mach 1. 2. It is very clearly designed for high alpha maneuvers, with high lift devices on the relatively deep wings and canted vertical stabilizers. However, this requires that it be at low dynamic pressure to not rip the wings or kill the crew. Having the jets sitting above the fuselage like that, will make force to slam it forward. Maybe even tumble it headfirst into the ground if it stalls. I seriously wonder why the engine are not sitting to the sides. 4. The intake design is highly questionable during high alpha maneuvers. This is especially important because if an engine suddenly chokes and stalls from the drop in air pressure, the aircraft may leave the envelope of controlled flight as the pitchdown moment from the engine ceases and so does the vertical thrust. Even if it has thrust vector control, it may not actually have the power to regain control in a timely manner after a compressor stall. 5. Considering how it might be prone to going into a deep stall, the aircraft looks to have a lot of angular inertia in yaw. The wideset engines, huge wings, and turbofans (but really more like ducted turboprops) in the wings lend themselves to making it harder to escape a flat spin. And the anhedral on the wings doesn't help, although their being high on the fuselage does. 6. Obviously this thing is not designed as an SSTO or a submersible aircraft and wouldn't function as one without applying a healthy dose of ultra-futuristic magitech.
@simpleisbetter41324 жыл бұрын
"Magitech" - says it all beautifully.
@tlshortyshorty58104 жыл бұрын
I'm pinning this. Great analysis.
@spontaneouslord37564 жыл бұрын
01:55 Man, I didn't realize that it was an old model of Quinjet before watching this video.
@Empiro34 жыл бұрын
The Quinjet has 5 engines -- you mentioned the 2 jet engines, and 2 VTOL engines. It also has 1 linear areospike rocket engine that I think you only see in the AOS series to take it into space.
@SodaPopin5ki4 жыл бұрын
I built an SSTO in KSP with 2 Whiplash jets, 2 Thuds for above 20 km, and 1 NERV for space. I should call that a Quinjet.
@barbar30214 жыл бұрын
I was expecting more of an indept analysis of the aircraft design. Ehehe
@glitterboy20984 жыл бұрын
This video would have been a bit better if you'd focused on one specific line of quinjets (the SHIELD/Hydra type seen in the first avengers film,, civil war, and the agents of shield series) and then examined the larger Stark built Avengers version seen in later films as a separate entity. which is very clearly is, being of a different size, design, and performance.
@RameesMuhammedMK3 жыл бұрын
Yeah - he generalized everything. The Stark quinjet is single piloted and uses repulsors for VTOL where the SHEILD version has two pilots and uses ducted fans for VTOL, later upgraded with scramjet engines for the thrust
@lynchkid0034 жыл бұрын
Something I don't like about the Quinjet is the articulating cockpit design... Adds a failure point
@eriktrimble87844 жыл бұрын
Not to mention huge weight.
@joelellis70354 жыл бұрын
Also some really funky aerodynamics as well as just unnecessary complexity.
@bradz764 жыл бұрын
Shit its a movie
@chord_01214 жыл бұрын
"Helicopters are flying bricks"
@QuantumAscension14 жыл бұрын
It appears the Quinjet also uses a hybrid lifting-body design, which would better explain its bulky fuselage.
@JustMeESM3 жыл бұрын
The quinjets design in Age of Ultron is different, right? It seemed so much advanced and more badass
@Raist4744 жыл бұрын
I think the Gau-17 sounding like a single-barrel vickers machine gun was the most rage-inducing facet of this aircraft. Marvel can't handle the BRRRRR!
@TheSp0kesman4 жыл бұрын
I personally think someone got the idea from the Skyranger from the Xcom series. At least the idea for a jet/VTOL vehicle capable of depositing a squad for operations wherever it's needed. Something about the idea is just so badass. having looked at some pictures, I'm now much more sure it was at least part of the inspiration. The Skyranger from Enemy Unknown has the same two turbofans in the wings and general bulkiness. Though they definitely made their own unique model that is probably more realistic.
@mocoj74234 жыл бұрын
Both were likely inspired by the V-22 Osprey
@MrRevan9914 жыл бұрын
@@mocoj7423the quinjet appears in the comic's as far back as 1969 avengers #61
@Khanclansith4 жыл бұрын
Are you going to do the MIG Firefox from the Clint Eastwood movie of the same name
@corporategunner59724 жыл бұрын
Please make a video about the breakdown on the Zeon Mobile Suits
@maverickso83974 жыл бұрын
And the original Gundam
@arielalexandroarnaldo22383 жыл бұрын
@@maverickso8397 The video should also make references to the 2018 movie Ready Player One that featured robots sponsored by Bandai such as Voltron, Gundam, and Mechagodzilla
@stratometal4 жыл бұрын
Do the Milano next!
@ky1ebetts3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if Cap could take the Milano down like he took out the Quinjet by bouncing his shield off of it twice.
@worldsedge49913 жыл бұрын
My interpretation of the downward flex of the wings upon landing is that it's done to enhance ground effect. It captures the high pressure air underneath that is produced by those rotors and the high attack forward movement, making a cushion underneath.
@Blackcloud_Garage4 жыл бұрын
I’ve been waiting for this exact video but discussing the troop transport helicopter (not the gunships) from Pandora.
@tjh449614 жыл бұрын
I know that several folks have built scale models of the Pandora craft, but they make use of quad rotor tech, the wings don't provide much, if any, lift.
@paogene12883 жыл бұрын
@@tjh44961 I genuinely believe that those are contra rotating rotors.
@MonkeyJedi994 жыл бұрын
IIRC, the quadjet was not VTOL, it was STOSL (Short Take-Off, Short-Landing). And somehow made space-worthy by Director Krennik.
@phydeux3 жыл бұрын
Somehow = Lots of caulking.
@KC_Smooth4 жыл бұрын
Cool video, but I was hoping for an answer as to how viable it’s design from a real world perspective. Maybe we’ll see one in the future?
@FirstInLastOutYT3 жыл бұрын
The interesting part is that he goes back and forth between versions of the Quinjet to support his argument which makes it an unreliable argument. If you go back and forth between two versions of something which a massive amount of changes take place from V1 to V2.
@flankerchan3 жыл бұрын
My greatest complaint on Quinjet in technical term are its Wing mounted fan. It consumes so much volume, down to the point of questionable amount of fuel volume it can carry.
@Connor.SG-1Ring3 жыл бұрын
The MCU has a lot of plot holes, one in particular I have issues with is back when Fury said that S.H.I.E.L.D started researching and developing weapons using the Tesseract, because of what happened in _Thor (2011)._ However, it's now been established in _Captain Marvel (2019)_ that S.H.I.E.L.D (Fury in particular) had already been aware of the existence of hostile alien forces since back in the 90's. Meaning that S.H.I.E.L.D already had the means and reason to start making Tesseract based weaponry. Thus by the time _Thor (2011)_ or _Avengers (2012)_ rolled in, S.H.I.E.L.D would've already had an arsenal such weapons. Alternatively, Thanos would've also learned the location of the Tesseract and Earth much earlier.
@caradellinowazer29884 жыл бұрын
Great vid, but I have my doubts on the auto rotation theory. You would need more diameter to keep up rotational speed and the aerodynamical layout to support reversed airflow (as a helicopter has). Imho power off landings rely on gliding principle. But the most important feature: it looks cool and they do a lot to sell it as possibly working 😉
@robstone45374 жыл бұрын
I agree, a helicopter has long wide rotors with plenty of surface area so they rotate quite slowly. The Quinjet has many small rotors blades in a housing, more like a ducted turbofan producing thrust than a rotor generating lift. They would need to be spinning at high speed to generate lift.
@HellFireAlliance4 жыл бұрын
As a stand alone transport it'd be faster than a helicopter while maintaining the VTOL of the helicopter. If we could actually make some, IRL, it would be awesome. Just wish there was a decent/available model kit for the quintet
@Valandar24 жыл бұрын
Compare it to the OG comic book Quinjets... those things were literally flying bricks. :D
@indianajones43214 жыл бұрын
You should review the show Spaceforce
@GenerationFilms4 жыл бұрын
Love it
@pyeitme5084 жыл бұрын
@@GenerationFilms ya better!
@PGGraham4 жыл бұрын
As a real Engineer doing real space exploration equipment, and simulation habitats, I hated it. Much of the fun stuff is fun, but the stuff they get wrong is so wrong it hurt too much to like the rest ..
@generaljimmies34294 жыл бұрын
Does the Arwing(Arrow Wing)design from Star Fox make sense? Mk1 Arwing(SNES Star Fox) Mk2 Arwing(Star Fox 64) Mk2 Arwing Zero(Star Fox Zero), this includes the Black Armor variant(More firepower but less shield strength) Mk3 Arwing(Star Fox Assault)
@steelgreyed3 жыл бұрын
The single funniest thing I've witnessed in this life is watching Ghost in the Shell in 1995, and then watching the USMC adopt pretty much EVERYTHING that flew in that movie as their standard infantry deployment tech in the 2010's.
@Raeinok4 жыл бұрын
Does the Helicarrier even have point defense weapons or really any way of intercepting in coming missiles? Seems like just a flying target, a single F22 taking out an engine and the whole thing comes down.
@ucitymetalhead4 жыл бұрын
Id imagine that they do shield wouldn't be that dumb but that's what they have the cloak for.
@Snapper3143 жыл бұрын
The Quinjet is NOT just a Combat aircraft. It is a multirole aircraft that serves many roles.
@ev01ve144 жыл бұрын
It could be used to shuttle around soldiers, but not very well in battle, seeing how venerable the propellers were, and how of one went down, the ship goes down
@Vinnocentus4 жыл бұрын
Wasnt it in space at some point? I dont think that makes sense lol. I take back what I said lol
@r01d24 жыл бұрын
you know, in Ragnarok, Thor's first plan was to use Avengers Quinjet to enter "Devil Anals" before abort the plan, either Thor just jump the gun or he know their Quinjet capable doing that
@manuelcjr524 жыл бұрын
There are vacuum capable variants
@MonkeyJedi994 жыл бұрын
In Agents of Shield, they took one orbital to trap an alien organism and blow it up. (Plus a former Hydra agent and a shield agent)
@simpleisbetter41324 жыл бұрын
@@MonkeyJedi99 That's right, good call. It couldn't maneuver in space.
@jackcooper77274 жыл бұрын
Oh yea its da thicc boi
@voodoo01124 жыл бұрын
Titans are the real thicc boys
@LeeCarlson4 жыл бұрын
My only quibble is that you never answer the question posed by this episode's title. Does the quinjet design make sense?
@barghestblue7314 жыл бұрын
It really doesnt
@generaljimmies34294 жыл бұрын
Does the Arwing(Arrow Wing)design from Star Fox make sense? Mk1 Arwing(SNES Star Fox) Mk2 Arwing(Star Fox 64) Mk2 Arwing Zero(Star Fox Zero), this includes the Black Armor variant(More firepower but less shield strength) Mk3 Arwing(Star Fox Assault)
@jonbar38424 жыл бұрын
As a student helicopter pilot the only thing you got right about helicopters is the auto rotation part. That's not how seal team six crashed and they are not like flying bricks they can glide. Not very well but if you couldn't glide you wouldnt be able to auto rotate.
@Sam-iw6te4 жыл бұрын
How about the HALO Pelican, SHIELD Quinjet and LAAT face off?
@henryd.48023 жыл бұрын
Jet engines also need colder air to work well, that's why the Harrier had an issue with sucking in it's own hot air and suddenly losing lift. the experimental Boeing X-32 had a cold air nozzle to act as a screen to push hot air from it's jets away from the intake.
@darkheartlost58265 ай бұрын
You guys really truly need to do a breakdown of the Zephyr One from Agents of Shield
@ascherlafayette85723 жыл бұрын
2 things 1 is that while autorotations are an emergency procedure, they are in no way a crash landing. It's basically the equivalent of gliding a plane. Pilots practice them regularly and are very comfortable with the maneuver. I've ridden with a pilot on a practice autorotation it was not violent or terrifying. 2 I doubt the quintet can auto rotate as it has very small rotors and it is unlikely they are controlled through pitch adjustment. Also it has wings
@edwardbryan95014 жыл бұрын
The Quinjet is cool to me. But I’m waiting for Tony Stark to add his Ark Reactor for a major power upgrade or add Vibranium armor like Captain America.
@alexojeda90484 жыл бұрын
Weeeell, you're going to be waiting awhile for the simple fact that Tony's DEEEAAAD!!!
@breadw74904 жыл бұрын
If I'm not mistaken, auto rotation depends on changing the pitch of the rotors of a helicopter, but can the quintet change the pitch of the rotors on its turbo fans though🤔
@ky1ebetts3 жыл бұрын
Cap took down the mighty quinjet like it was nothing, literally by vaguely bouncing his shield off of it twice.
@jeffjohnson19664 жыл бұрын
Great video! I respect the amount of research you put into these videos! The details do not go unnoticed!
@stillunsure76304 жыл бұрын
Hi guys, Wondered if you'd do alternative scifi wargaming reviews? Void 1.1's game "Age of Tyrants" 6mm wargame really interests me and love your review of the fighting strengths and armoured vehicles?
@markcastonguay79064 жыл бұрын
the problem with the hulk and "F-35B" scene is that it isn't really an F-35. first, none of the three versions has two cannons and second, the B version doesn't have an internal cannon it can only mount a pod mounted gun as the needed lift motor takes up to much space to allow a cannon mounted internally.
@madkabal4 жыл бұрын
It was the F-35 "D" ...... idk lol :)
@seanwheeler31163 жыл бұрын
One point about the Harrier in the Falklands is no of them were lost in air to air combat. Ground fire and faults / accidents only.
@skizzik1214 жыл бұрын
can you even reference the price of Quinjet in a universe with the Helicarriers or Iron Mans suit?
@evanrideout39194 жыл бұрын
For most the questions I see in the comments, people should really check out Agents of Shield. The show is awesome and goes more in-depth with the technical stuff in the MCU. Albeit, the show won't answer all of the questions.
@TgamerBio55294 жыл бұрын
It was very good for transporting troops or supplies from space to atmosphere and also they could of just research military space ships
@ile20384 жыл бұрын
In certain aspects this aircraft makes 100% and i love to see it in real life cause with our current technology we may be able to make something like this but only for troop carrying and ground support
@abyssstrider25474 жыл бұрын
Its Renounce not renouce
@ile20384 жыл бұрын
@@abyssstrider2547 ik I've tried to change it 400x but KZbin says no.....well actually i have whenever i click on it myself I see it changed but when i click off it's not changed
@prometheus80102 жыл бұрын
Could fill alot of roles military uses multiple different aircraft for
@colbysteffens29763 жыл бұрын
I love the quinjet its the one of the best vehicles in the mcu
@AUS51134 жыл бұрын
I love the quinn jet. It is awesome. To bad it is only in the movies. I would love to see it in real life but like the guy below said where will you store the fuel? Unless it is so far advanced that it runs on alternative energy source not using liquid fuel.
@guts-1412 жыл бұрын
Certainly wish we got Arc Reactor all over the world
@kuyachamp76183 жыл бұрын
Quinjets looks like a stingray wearing metal armor and has no tail.
@morrisho64502 жыл бұрын
Description correction: The S.H.I.E.L.D Quinjet is the latest in hybrid carrier fighters deployed by Avengers and Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D in the Marvel films and TV show
@gunraptor4 жыл бұрын
I'm pretty sure you can't auto rotate a ducted fan aircraft. The blades have too little surface area.
@dannyr29764 жыл бұрын
Make a quinjet supersonic, we have ourselves a new Airwolf!
@0623kaboom4 жыл бұрын
we did we called it the avro arrow ... 70 years ago ... ok it wasnt vstol ... the rest was there then ... and still hasnt been matched to date. thats right the arrow's design specification that is was made to meet has not been met by modern jets like the f35, f22, f18 and even the f15 ... and all their variants ... . and the arrow was designed in the late 50's ... thats 70 years and no one has made a plane that matches what the arrow was designed to beat
@dannyr29764 жыл бұрын
@@0623kaboom Thanks, I know little about this plane other than it was Canadian, and way, waaay ahead it's time. There was a video somewhere that speculated how fare against the F-35 in terms of cost and tehnology if released now.
@tolvaer3 жыл бұрын
as sci fi becomes fact, it is telling that there are similarities that are blatant precursors to what we may see; "what will the Simpsons and DARPA dream up next?". My personal favorite are Halo's Pelicans and Falcons, Long sword and sabres look very familiar too.
@TaijDevon3 жыл бұрын
I must support Alderwolf. Good engineer. You have several problems with these kind of ideas. One of the biggest is reaction mass. Which he pointed out. You need more fuel mass but more mass makes you accelerate less. You can't use F=MA anymore. Force is actually the time derivative of momentum. Which is F=MA in some situations but if you are blowing tons out the backside it quickly becomes inaccurate. If mass is constant, it is MA. Derivivate of velocity is acceleration.But is mass is rapidly changing it is a mess. If I recall correctly it is a Langrangian. Basically this means you go of the middle of where your rocket or plane thrusts to move and calculate equal and opposite masses from the craft and fuel expended. So you calculate from the mid point of thrust being expended to mass lost to your projectile/plane/spaceship opening up its engines. The Langrangian is L=V-T where V is the kinect energy and T is the potential energy. V means the energy of someone punching you and T means looking over a cliff and thinking, hmm I might die if I fell off. Sorry, longwinded, but this is why it is called reaction mass.
@m1k3droid4 жыл бұрын
I never figured out where the fifth engine is
@cleeiii3574 жыл бұрын
I think its between the 2 rear engines.
@r01d24 жыл бұрын
the core? I just imagining it maybe had center engine like Iron Man chest
@johnverick-smith97944 жыл бұрын
The fifth one is a horizontal thruster between the upper rear thrusters. They only use it for boosting maneuvers.
@nickwhite25823 жыл бұрын
So, basically a Pelican from Halo? Then again, the Pelican explains why it has almost no fuel storage.(hint, it's fusion rockets)
@reyberrones13474 жыл бұрын
Surprised that you didn't mention that the Stark Industries quinjet that Bruce Banner modified to dock with Avenger's Tower also includes a version of the Project P.E.G.A.S.U.S. Light-Speed engine, which is ultimately how Hulk ended up on Sakaar.
@r01d24 жыл бұрын
is it confirmed Hulk was space-jump by himself? I always have headcanon someone kidnap Hulk using bifrost-like way
@johnverick-smith97944 жыл бұрын
@@r01d2 in ragnarok it was explained that the wormholes can open up randomly and it was one of those that brought Hulk to Sakaar. Especially considering how utterly SHIELD lost it over the ocean without any debris or black box to recover.
@WAVEFUNCTION_TV3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting about planes only taking off at night in Dubai. I never knew such a thing was the case 😳
@kempmt14 жыл бұрын
I seriously like to see us make something similar, for it will be better than anything we currently have,
@vipermark74 жыл бұрын
The Age Of Ultron Quinjet is not the same craft from Avengers Assemble or Agents Of Shield. It is referred to as such, but is a vehicle designed by Tony for the Avengers. It’s totally different. That’s why it’s covered in repulsors, not normal engines. Constantly referring generically to “the quinjet”, but showing the different versions is a bit inaccurate.
@contessa.adella3 жыл бұрын
Anything will fly, given enough thrust....but that is the show stopper with these cartoon craft. They somehow develop ten times the thrust you could really expect from that much engine space in the airframe...and at the same time have ten times the fuel range. Getting into space needs a separate oxidant for the fuel...where is that stored then? I love how they are made to look plausible tho’ just don’t ask difficult questions huh!
@bruneauandreas5643 жыл бұрын
This story about Dubai is so true that the controllers in Dubai actually lie about the OAT, 56 C being the max limit for most Emirates operated aircrafts, you can hear during summer all day long in the ATIS OAT 56 C ;)
@amigajoe14 жыл бұрын
Where's the 5th engine?
@curtisjordan53033 жыл бұрын
Very cool sci-fi aircraft. I do think it would run into the f-35B issues with weight and performance. Also the wings wouldn't be able to store much fuel, so the range would be limited. Could we build it....strong possibility but, it would not fly like the movie if at all.
@biggles2583 жыл бұрын
At about 8:00: I'd never even heard of plans having difficulty taking off in hot environments. Just goes to show - you live and learn
@mattcroshaw69153 жыл бұрын
The Harley wasn’t dropped out of the quinjet in Sokovia. It was in Seoul, South Korea.
@sohanprasad89893 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation
@Sergeantgrunt3 жыл бұрын
Why would SHIELD put it's HQ in the Philippines? Since they want to display the Lat/Long I'd assume that it would have been somewhere in the East Coast like it was depicted. Forget about Dubai and the hot weather, we have the same issues here in Phoenix.
@Felon_Confirmed2 жыл бұрын
the turbo fans work by using spinning geras kinda like lego but that the bigger gear is the fan and smaller gears are the one that spin the fan
@WRMonger13 жыл бұрын
I’ve got an issue with the ramp in the back for troop un-assing. The engines in the back are in dangerous proximity to that exit, using a parachute in the vicinity would be dicie at best and catastrophic to say the least. Just wondering about the physics of that exercise...
@Utubesuperstar3 жыл бұрын
You know you don’t pull your chute immediately... have you ever actually jumped out of a plane before?
@krishsane20143 жыл бұрын
According to agents of shield s7, quinjets exhibit 63000 pound force of thirst per turbine (not the vtol one). This is extremely powerful for its size and shows that shield rotors are very powerful.
@robertphillips62963 жыл бұрын
Have you done one on the Valkyrie?
@jameskratzer45384 жыл бұрын
QuinJet: V-22 Osprey on steroids with thrusters, basically. The difference being, we HAVE the V-22, at great expense and after 20-plus years of trial and error. The QuinJet may, one day, be a possible replacement for the Osprey (and the Valor that the Army is looking at) - but not yet.
@skizzik1214 жыл бұрын
QuadJet reminds me of more than a little bit of the Pelican from the HALO series
@ethanspaziani52694 жыл бұрын
Hey hey don't know if this message will get read by you but it's worth a try you should look at the movie stealth and the aircraft in it I really love that movie and it helps send me towards the path that I am on today! Im an aircraft enthusiasts and those designs always will have a special place
@dongadson10994 жыл бұрын
It's the same thing and setup as Foehammer's UNSC Pelican. Now, she delivers!!! R.I.P
@spontaneouslord3756 Жыл бұрын
If Boeing V-22 Osprey is possible then Quinjet is also possible. Now there is F-35 with Vtol. They are just not putting money into Developing Quinjet Technology. Think if this Technology is developed then how Safe can Air-travel be. But it seems like they don't want to develop that technology on purpose.
@OllamhDrab4 жыл бұрын
Sci-fi spaceship to actually *want* is always the *van* spaceship. Topic to treat and discuss. :)
@DEEZ_N4T4 жыл бұрын
CSAT weapons manufacturer: are you sure this will give us the edge over the Americans CSAT: yes