Don Smith Magnetic Resonance

[@GG-od2tr]

It is not often a gentleman comes along and shares his knowledge and is able to do so for us unlearned and also show the learned they still have more to learn. You are a blessing Joel. I truly enjoy watching your shares.

[@Biokemist-o3k]

Excellent again Joel..I hope you survived the holidays well...Thank you for the explanation at such a level that even with an understanding it is always good to reinforce prior knowledge..Thanks again John

[@DionDifelice]

What!? I love learning new dynamics like this! Amazing research and sharing!!! Thank you 😎🤙

[@badboypaulpark]

Thank you Joel, for thorough investigation and explanation of this mind-blowing phenomena

[@CheyenneChild-]

What I've noticed is that the more tuned two resonant bodies are, the more of their inductive and capacitive reactance is shared when in proximity, which fluffs with the tuning. You can mathematically approximate the tuning in a lot of ways, but it really is easier to just have a tuning nob because you never know how they'll combine in the real world to give you your frequency. Using super high frequency doubly helps because you can keep your resonators more distanced so they share less reactance yet are still coupled to the same near field area. It's strange how that works, you would normally imagine their power coupling linked in this same way, yet it doesn't appear to be so.

[@bobann3566]

Well, when I think of a magnet, it is a coherent object so tuning them is logical.

[@ElijahCokeley]

your insights are always a treat

[@neworld4ever]

Thank you so much for posting this video - explains so much and helps get the sweet spot we are all looking for. If I understand correctly, you are transmitting 100 mega hertz because your coil is small diameter?

[@joellagace1679]

yes just for simplicity and sake of this demo. No need to read into it for a secret frequency range. Was just convenient for the demo.

[@JeffreyEllis-p7s]

If I may suggest, add a third pulsating antenna to act as a deflection device to push stray air fields out of the way so that two of the three fields coupled in bursts and rotate back to the third and do causing a positive-positive energy effect that oscillates between each to extract energy from the Aether. The secret in my opinion that Tesla was utilizing was to have three wires of the self-similar polarity to cause rectification to the Aether which we see in a spark gap array. You can use spherical neodymium magnetics to achieve similar effects… let us know what your experiences with this are? Thanks Joel - you’re a really GREAT Genius!!! Thanks for all your hard work!!!😊

[@thecontact2609]

Very educational Joel and thank you!

[@jasonjaffray4025]

AWSOME BROTHER MORE POWER TO YOU THIS 25 MAY YOU GET STRONGER IN MIND BODY SPIRIT AS YOU SHARE THE LIGHT 👍👍👍👍👍💡🙏✅🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉SALUTE TO YOU JOEL

[@mykedoes4099]

its worth shaving off some insulation every turn but but separate the next shave by 90 degree for better separation . Then you can tap off different parts of the inductance for the sweet spot or at least you will be able to home in on the best henry level

[@ianjackson4571]

Only half way through but the windings: if you flip the other way clockwise anti clockwise?

[@8thsinner]

Do you think this is what Moray might have been doing, only using astronomical rf sources?

[@calcoin4199]

Hey Joel you should pick up a nanovna if you ever have a chance. A very cool tool for antenna analysis and much more only about 80 bucks and can do what this meter does and more 😊

[@fotografm]

Thank you for this excellent demonstration. My question is, what technical problem is solved by knowing where the sweet spot is ? ie. is there a practical application for this knowledge ? You mention the high Q resonance effect which implies that the effect would be highly frequency dependent, which it probably is not. The sweet distance appears to be around one twentieth of a wavelength at 100MHz. This is very much within the near field, were it an EM wave. The wave impedance would be very much different to the 377 ohms of free space. Does this sweet distance change when the frequency is changed ? Since the effect is magnetic, I wonder what happens if the coils are arranged coaxially ? I imagine you used ferrite cores ? The resonant frequency is governed by the interaction of stray capacitance with the inductances. The long wires used in the experiment probably cause quite large changes in stray capacitance when they are moved. Keep up the great work ! I love your blog btw.

[@AGI-Bingo]

Am i understanding correctly?.. you're sending very little power through your tool, and picking up also some e on the rec. What is the ratio between power sent to power harness? Prob not 1:1 but even at 1:x if you could make 2x receivers, would you get 2x the e power? Not having conservation in an open system is wild.. let me know i catch your drift

[@bobann3566]

Ratio is 1: Φ (south pole) Just like an egg.🥚😃😊

[@pixelshader2004]

@joellagace1679 You are a great teacher, this is well explained and demonstrated, thank you! I have a question: are there other, longer sweet spot distances at which this transfer happens? Like maybe a multiple of your original sweet spot distance?

[@joellagace1679]

As you get far away from the nearfield zone. It drastically reduces.

[@AGI-Bingo]

A few questions, would having it in a much higher rf frequency result in a bigger field of operation? If so what freq do you need to send magnetism 50+m away? Secondly, would tweaking the freq or phase cause a change in the swr? If you could have data transfer ota between the two , you can maybe make adjustments to the freq or phase in rt to hone in on resonance. Ideally the change should happen in the recievers independently. Like active noise cancellation.. active resonance matching. Lastly, am i understanding correctly?.. you're sending very little power through your tool, and picking up also some e on the rec. What is the ratio between power sent to power harness? Prob not 1:1 but even at 1:x if you could make 2x receivers, would you get 2x the e power? Not having conservation in an open system is wild.. let me know i catch your drift

[@joellagace1679]

two methods you can increase the Q on RX for higher volts, this is not inductive mutual coupled transformer action so current strength don't go down so you get more power like that. Or carefully place multiple coils along the sweet spot well placed and measured so they don't interfere this will be minimum at resonance to begin with. The higher the frequency the tighter the reactive near field zone. So too high you may not have enough field room area for all your rx antennas to be near.

[@ThisSideUp12]

Bro you just blew my mind! Major click moment for me

[@mykedoes4099]

👍

[@jensbuchholz5766]

❤

[@Genya_Vorobev]

Подключи второй луч осциллографа к катушки генератора и посмотри сигнал. И ты будешь удивлён что происходит обмен энергии и катушки работают в противофазе относительно друг друга

[@Jerrythenerdful]

You are just showing normal local reactive field coupling, nothing special or strange. It is not a different mode or a special mode at all. It really is the same thing as we have known about since the 1800s.

[@joellagace1679]

The classic ham operators, lmao... Always the square heads. Yet "we" are all the ones that have this knowledge and use it only with "radio" No wonder I left all your ham clubs years ago. No thinking outside the box. You remind me of my last ham radio club meeting before I gave all the old guys a hart attack for using RF tech with energy projects haha. Apparently against the good ol ham radio moral code to use ham tech for non ham usage. Silly! :) Salut from VA3JFL

[@N5KDA]

Please, it's not any more, and not "no more".

[@gionny7377]

Thanks for your valuable content, I sent you an email could you answer me thanks