Don't be fooled by this "Safe & Effective" Roulette Strategy

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

🎰😍Quiz to find your perfect Casino to play Roulette ➡ casinomatchmaker.com/quiz/

[@Chilllstorm]

I love how you show percentages of every strategy, very informative

[@kemikemi756]

Rafasha is that you

[@Chilllstorm]

@@kemikemi756 no

[@roulette-professional]

The real issue is covering so many pockets at the same time. With a negative expectation game where every bet size has the same percentage negative expectation means the more pockets you cover simply amplifies the negative, winning with increased frequency because you are covering so much of the table is just an illusion. Smaller bets with a carefully calculated progressions are more effective putting less stake at risk with a potential of higher returns if you get-in and get-out.

[@RandySmith-g4v]

Not true, you don't quite understand how this game works now do you? You must be a card player or maybe craps? Get your facts straight before you comment on this game ok?

[@roulette-professional]

@@RandySmith-g4v I replied politely with a link to further information but it looks like it was deleted

[@GuessMaster-xp9vk]

Table systems will never win even if you try to coat it with a sprinkle of Fibonacci dust, all these systems have been done for decades around and round the merry go round haha, there not new. there's only one strategy that a few players have used over the decades that beat the odds but people ain't willing to put in the work. they want the easy fix.

[@Dan0rioN]

Which systems? What about the D lambert system?

[@Dj87887]

They're*

[@Dj87887]

​@@Dan0rioN D'Alambert works until it doesn't just like all of the other strategies. They work until they don't because there will eventually be a long run of losses that you can't recover from. I made $1000 in a week the first time I tried D'Alembert, and then I lost everything in one day.

[@Dan0rioN]

@@Dj87887 With the numerous ways to use D'alambert it really comes down to context. Streaks go both ways

[@thomasjakobsen9208]

Its a good system until u get under 50% of ur stack,then it just eats ur stack slowly.

[@Cold88soul]

😂😂

[@ronaldjtriumph5985]

It's weird how quick my post is deleted the moment I explain the result on 2000 spins ... this is a joke. Played over 1000 spins on 2nd 12 and 3rd 12 as well as 2nd column and 3rd column. Without fail it target the corner numbers so NO the RNG is as random as Santa Clause is real. The fact that you deleted my post tells me a lot about how independent your channel is ... lol Online Roulette is run by an Algorithm, thus code written by a developer. Again I will say, for land based Casinos ... show me a perspex see through roulette wheel, then I will believe a Roulette result.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Why don't you play at a live wheel online?

[@ronaldjtriumph5985]

@@CasinoMatchmaker Have you seen how unnatural those balls behave? 😂😂😂 Recorded some live session and played the videos back at super slow speed ... Nobody should trust anything but a living breathing person in front of you ... Even then I'd be very sceptical...

[@Charley7771]

I just saw today a loosing of 12 dozens in a row. Online Casino probably rigged, took a huge bite in my bank roll............

[@SixlineForever]

You win what you don't close; out of these numbers, you always lose one. If you do not cover 5 numbers, then the share of 0 is 20%. If, say, you close 6 numbers (sixline), then the share of 0 is 3.2%. There is a difference?

[@gerrybutcher3202]

On a loss of doz or colm do you increase all 4 bets or only the doz or colm that lost?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

With the Fibonacci way of doing it? You would just increase the losing column or dozen. Think of it as using the Fibonacci strategy, but playing 4 (2 dozens + 2 collumns) at the same time

[@YoutubeCensorsYou]

There is no strategy in the world that won't drain you. Only difference is: some will drain you slowly, others quickly. House will always have an edge. That's why that '0' on the top - and an additional '00' on american roulette - exists.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Wow, need to get up early to fool you

[@web3wallbanks]

Another great vid mate

[@joelphang7214]

Safe but no strategy is safe biting your tongue devils food😢

[@nb8665]

The best roulette channel on youtube

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

I appreciate that 😍

[@nb8665]

Your Fibonacci video won me a lot of money. I was bouncing between 10 different electronic tables at City Of Dreams in Manila. The ratio was 480:1 (200 peso/96,000 peso. That would give 14 spins, but I was playing with a bankroll for 10 spins. I was looking for tables when a dozen had not hit 10x before I started playing. It was very successful. 1 time I arrived at a table with 11 misses and started playing. I was all in on the 21st spin and i won. However, at another casino with smaller betting limits I got cleaned out, luckily with much smaller bankroll. I watched a dozen not hit for 23 spins. The system works, but you must learn to walk when you have reached your target profit. Professionals walk with profit. Have a good day and thanks for the videos.

[@breteboy1968]

Personally i dont think the percentages are realistic. With system if you lose 12 in a row. For me you only had 12 chances over the percentages. 12 chances = rng not actually percentage. Odds may say 1 thing mathematically but gambling can say otherwise.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

What do you mean sorry you only had 12 chances? I agree this system is not as good as it first looks

[@marcos_mathias]

Estava pensando aplicar Romanovsky com gestao de Fibonacci.... Como sera que me sairia?????

[@burakyldrm1738]

Stearn system is the best for roulette

[@pandoyplays]

Hi. Can you make a live video doing this Strategy? It helps a lot for your subscriber. Thanks

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Hey! Sure it's on the list, I will upload it as soon as I can

[@kemikemi756]

I'll try this later tonight

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

With the flat bet or doing it with the Fib sequence?

[@kemikemi756]

@@CasinoMatchmaker As you recommended. Sounds intresting idea to try out

[@Chilllstorm]

First

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Who do you agree with? Me and the casino dealer?

[@Chilllstorm]

@@CasinoMatchmaker I agree with you 100%

[@breteboy1968]

I think roulette machines are rigged. I once stuck with the 3rd collumn noticed it hadnt dropped for x10 rolls. So i tried that system lucky for me lowest best was £1. But it lost 12times. A staggering 22times not hitting the 3rd collumn. Ive once seen it hit red 17times in a row when i bet on black!

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

17 reds in a row is insane! 22 spins without a column is very rare as well. make sure you're playing at fair and vetted casinos!

[@breteboy1968]

Fucked up thing was i bet on red and black came in right after i was waiting for black on what would of been 18th attempt. i switched to red. I thought fk it! Red! Boom black! And i rage quit haha 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. Im laughing now but i was almost crying at the time lol. To me thats suspiciously rigged! And not random. Like the machine wouldnt have gave me any win unless it had gathered enough cash to pay out.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

@@breteboy1968 Haha fuck, that's suspicious for sure

[@leftinhell]

I'm not very familiar with the eurowheel but with the american wheel the bottom column is more evenly spaced on the wheel. The top and middle columns are more bunched up with bigger gaps of uncovered numbers. For instance, the top column has 2 gaps of 8 uncovered numbers and the middle has gaps of 12 and 8. While the bottoms gaps are at most 5 and 4. So if the wheel keeps hitting in an area it could go on for quite a while, especially with the middle column almost always hitting or always missing.

[@danield-h1j]

yes but lambert over fib and counting each of the 4 bets as completely separate from each other. Hard to keep track of but the best system I got that's a flat bet system

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Interesting you say Lambert on the 2/1 bets. Next week's video discusses that topic so make sure to see it !

[@danield-h1j]

awesome. lambert gives you alot of flexibility to go 1up on loss and 2 down or 1 up and reset on win. more flexibility gives you better chance to make decisions based on your current risk. 4way individual bets also gives you tons of freedom to bet on hot and cold. also way less escalation than fib style. 4 sperate bets is too much for fibinochi. @@CasinoMatchmaker

[@sksum2350]

A great way to play on European Roulette is the one where you pick a dozen or column, starting at the table minimum, then add a unit as soon as a winner makes its way or just leaves the last 5 outcomes, except when 3 or more winners can be observed in those 5 numbers, which is an indication for not to push it.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

What's this system called? I'm struggling to understand it

[@JB-rv7gw]

@@sksum2350you’re making this way to confusing, how about make an example

[@reccemdown]

​@@JB-rv7gwthere is a better way using fibonnacci sequence. (0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,....) Start 1 unit on a column, 1 unit on a dozen. Since the odds are the same after every spin, i like to rotate which dozen and column i use. I go off of the previous number. For example: i just sat down. Haven't bet yet. Table hits a 35. Thats 3rd dozen and, 2nd column. So my first bet will be the 2nd dozen, and the 3rd column. Table hits a 2. 1st dozen, 2nd column. So now I continie the sequence, do 1 unit on the 2nd dozen, and 1 unit on the 1st column. If you hit both numbers (say table hits a 13) it is a push. If you miss, (say table hits a 35) now you increase your bet to 2 units, as per the sequence. Table hit a 35, I am 3 spins in and no wins. 2 units on 2nd dozen, and 2 units 3rd column. Table hits a 27. I cash in my winnings from the column bet and start over at 1 unit on the columns. Now we have 3 units on the 3rd dozen, and 1 unit on the 3rd dozen. Table hits a 3. You win the column again, still no dozen. Now jump up to 5 units, on 3rd dozen, and 1 unit on 3rd column. Table hits a 36. You get all your money back, plus a little bonus to start over. Now at this point you should know, as soon as you hit both of your bets on a single spin, you're guarenteed to be up money. So walk away when you hit both your bets. Or if you want to have a little fun, use this method to play strictly on house money, so when you eventually lose everything you can walk away with having lost nothing. Then while youre on house money just go all in on black or red, and try to build a streak using more risky strategy or playing more risky games like slots. I stand by this method (assuming theres no magnets or other foul play involved, and remember by default it is less effective on American roulette with green 00)

[@fortunatusnine2012]

🤔

[@Mrhunterfishermen]

It’s all rigged bull

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

I wouldn't say Roulette is riged, but this system is definitely not as good as it first looks

[@Mrhunterfishermen]

@@CasinoMatchmaker nothing in this world is equal

[@viettuannguyen3]

Another great video! Keep it up!

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Appreciate it thanks

[@dirtycamrc]

At a glance it does look like a slow but safe way to play. I completely agree though your adaptation would make it much better and maybe your friend has given you the leg up to finding the perfect strategy now you've adapted it.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

I will test it out for sure !

[@bonsenscoherence9257]

Hello ! interesting, but I don't understand how you can play FIBONACCI and 2 Columns and 2 dozens in the same time ?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Hello. So you would treat them all as seperate bets... For example if the ball landed in the middle column, then stay at $5 for the middle column but progress along the Fibonacci sequence on the top column until it wins

[@bonsenscoherence9257]

@@CasinoMatchmaker ok thank you I understand, but in my statistiques I saw 21 times columns without come