What Is Buddhist Nirvana?

[@DougsDharma]

🧡 If you find benefit in my videos, consider supporting the channel by joining us on Patreon and get fun extras like exclusive videos, ad-free audio-only versions, and extensive show notes: www.patreon.com/dougsseculardharma 🙂 📙 You can find my book here: books2read.com/buddhisthandbook

[@emperorpalpatine9841]

Thanks for sharing, however I would like to address 3 points you made. 1) The suttas actually do say nibbana is beyond conceptualization. “If you say that, ‘When the six fields of contact have faded away and ceased with nothing left over, something else still exists’, you’re proliferating the unproliferated. If you say that ‘something else no longer exists’, you’re proliferating the unproliferated. If you say that ‘something else both still exists and no longer exists’, you’re proliferating the unproliferated. If you say that ‘something else neither still exists nor no longer exists’, you’re proliferating the unproliferated. The scope of proliferation extends as far as the scope of the six fields of contact. The scope of the six fields of contact extends as far as the scope of proliferation. When the six fields of contact fade away and cease with nothing left over, proliferation stops and is stilled.” -AN 4.173 2) There is actually an explanation for what was meant by a tathagatha neither existing after death nor not-existing. “Any consciousness by which one describing the Tathāgata would describe him: That the Tathāgata has abandoned, its root destroyed, made like a palmyra stump, deprived of the conditions of development, not destined for future arising. Freed from the classification of consciousness, great king, the Tathāgata is deep, boundless, hard to fathom, like the ocean. ‘The Tathāgata exists after death’ doesn’t apply. ‘The Tathāgata doesn’t exist after death doesn’t apply. ‘The Tathāgata both exists and doesn’t exist after death’ doesn’t apply. ‘The Tathāgata neither exists nor doesn’t exist after death’ doesn’t apply.” -SN 44:1 This clearly says none of these apply and that it is something that can’t be fathomed. The explanation is made even for the tathagatha even while he is still alive. “And so, Anurādha-when you can’t pin down the Tathāgata as a truth or reality even in the present life-is it proper for you to declare, ‘Friends, the Tathāgata-the supreme man, the superlative man, attainer of the superlative attainment-being described, is described otherwise than with these four positions: The Tathāgata exists after death, does not exist after death, both does & does not exist after death, neither exists nor does not exist after death’?” -SN 22:86 All together all the points I made before seem to point to the fact that the tathagatha is incomprehensible in this way whether before or after death. 3) You are right that if something is incomprehensible then it won’t have much of a reason for people to see as a goal. However, the Buddha uses skillful means and describes it as the end of suffering (and many such ways) not because there is a one to one equivalence, but rather because by pointing to samsara and telling us what negative qualities of it are not present in samsara. So even though the actuality of nirvana is beyond comprehension, you can point to what about samsara won’t be present. And that makes it relatable.

[@DougsDharma]

Thanks for that, I am familiar with these passages and would interpret them somewhat differently. That said, the apophatic interpretation of nirvana is not unpopular.

[@facts7258]

@@emperorpalpatine9841 hey can i have your insta id ?

[@timbomilko5367]

As usual, Doug, beautifully articulate in summarizing the difference between early and divergent thinking on the nature of Nirvana (Nibbana). As an artist, I have a linocut of the three 'poisons' that hangs on my wall ... your descriptions of Nirvana as an absence or cessations of greed, hate and dilution just adds to the simplicity and complexity of understanding. Thanks.

[@DougsDharma]

Oh very nice! 🙏

[@radoskan]

My opinion: - Nibbana is without samsara since it is unconditioned (no karma involved). - Thus, it is impossible to describe nibbana with our language which is embedded within conditioned world. - Language can only be a "raft" to reach nibbana, but never describe it.

[@mitrabuddhi]

Nibbana can be [without samsara] as anihilation but nibbana can happens in this very life so it can be [with samsara] but samsara don't have any power to creating action based on vedana. So arahant can act only based on wisdom or compassion voluntarilly and desire or hatred can't move attention in liberated mind. This is nibbana. The cause for this is the cultivation of non-self.

[@user-oj8rg6vd7q]

Well as said in the suttas the fires needs grass and leaves ,once there are no leaves or grass there is no fire

[@JordanMMancini]

Doug, I love your videos, thank you so much. I would love to understand more about stream entry!

[@DougsDharma]

Yes thanks! See my video on the four stages of progress: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oYa6Zpt4fNR6brc

[@shivadasa]

Nirvana is Samsara without any conceptual superimposition. Samsara is a superimposition of concepts on Nirvana. The first conceptual form is “I am.” The material universe is then created by a proliferation of thought. Peace.

[@amonynous9041]

yeah but that is also just a conceptual view of something that is non-conceptual. Ineffable cannot be bound by descriptions and words, that's why it's ineffable.

[@shivadasa]

@@amonynous9041 It is a pointing out instruction. It seems obvious that we are all here on KZbin, reading and commenting and thus fully immersed in the universe of conceptual thought.

[@amonynous9041]

@@shivadasa this is the problem, we are all grasping at straws when it comes to discussing the ineffable. We say religious things like "if you attain this, this and this will happen", but the truth is we don't know, most of the things from these Buddhist doctrines are based in belief, because you can't ask someone who's supposedly become "Tathāgata" if all these doctrines are true or not. What about reincarnation, etc. who can ever prove these things, even if you had an enlightenment experience you can't know if these interpretations or "instructions" are correct or just dogmas people believe blindly. Even if you experienced the highest possible Nirvana and came back to this world, it's hard to bridge these two worlds. It's easy to fall into delusion, into all kinds of "interpretations" which can just become another form of hindrance to true liberation.

[@shivadasa]

@@amonynous9041 If by “we” you mean you and me, you are mistaken.

[@amonynous9041]

@@shivadasa yes, you made some claims which can not be proven but are completely based on some wackadoodle belief. Something in the vein of "material things in universe are a proliferation of thought" which is just BS. Did you think of the sun? Of course you didn't, you want to claim somebody's work, you just parrot things you read somewhere.

[@Kenji17171]

Thank you so much! That was what exactly I was wondering!

[@DougsDharma]

Glad I could help!

[@annleland6422]

Thank you for the good video. The most concrete description of Nirvana, to me at least, is the cessation of six sense- doors, as mentioned in ‘ the magic of the mind’ (p.77) by Bhikkhu K. Nanananda . It’s also a prescription for achieving it. I think there are two approaches: one open mindfulness method based on the teaching of Buddha to Bahiya( Concept and Reality p.29 by the same author above); the jhana method given by Ajahn Brahm in ‘ Mindfulness, Bliss, and Beyond(p.171). If the Nirvana means the cessation of all perception, it is of course inconceivable.

[@DougsDharma]

🙏

[@stevebelzer4758]

“ Once I caught a fleeting glimpse Out of the corner of my eye like a distant ships smoke on the horizon I tuned my head and it was gone “ - Comfortably numb Pink Floyd ❤

[@DougsDharma]

Yes, good song!

[@Zipjin]

Thank you for your wonderful summary. I saw that as time passed by, people started equating nirvana with death and non-existence. Yamaka Sutta (SN 22.85) warned us against such view. Upon seeing the insubstantial nature of the five aggregates, self-grasping is removed. Ideas like being and non-being have to be abandoned, as suggested by the Buddha to Upasiva (Sutta Nipata 5.7). “I” can no longer be defined. The Buddha, who has reached nirvana, grieved no longer, despite illness, old age, and death. For he has been rightly freed by non-grasping.

[@Jacques.dAnjou]

That, following the path of the Buddha, is what we’re wondering about. The way we communicate is with words, and maybe there are no words to describe Nirvana. That with what we re trying to understand Nirvana, is the mind; maybe the capacity of the mind is not sufficient to understand Nirvana. I have access to it in this particular moment. It is the absence of time, therefore also the place of being. It’s all the time everywhere. Yet it cannot be described. Thanks for your video’s, always a pleasure to watch, to play with, to think deeply about.

[@AGGARessiv3]

absence of time is correct because you escaped from it . The place of being is incorrect. Nirvana is not a place, space ,dimension nor location.

[@davidmendoza1300]

Hi Doug. Great video as usual. Not to get off topic, but I was wondering if you could do some videos on the Greek connection to Buddhism. You probably already have, but I was fascinated to learn that one of the oldest images of the Buddha was on a Greek coin, perhaps from Gandhara? Not sure. Also there was a recent discovery of a locally made Buddha statue in Egypt by an ex pat community living in Egypt. Thanks!

[@DougsDharma]

Hellenic contact with Buddhism happened after the invasion of Alexander to north India, typified by texts like the Questions of King Milinda, and artwork like that found in Gandhāra. Otherwise there are a few fragments of evidence here and there, but not enough for me to formalize into a real story at this point.

[@davidmendoza1300]

@@DougsDharma I think you give Alexander too much credit. The trade routes both by land and water are older forms of contact between ancient India and the Hellenistic world are they not?

[@TylerLloyd-oi7bz]

Thank you Namo buddhay

[@oldstudent2587]

The verb nibbana in Bengali (Bengali substitutes b for v and drops r's just like Pali) is a perfectly usable verb nowadays. It's rough equivalent in 'english' is the Pennsylvania Dutch verb 'outen' as in 'outen the light'. It means to shut the light off (or blow out the oil lamp, or whatever). It isn't so surprising that the end of suffering might be construed as bliss. In fact, in Mahayana, particularly Yogacara, the belief is that the two words sukha and dukkha are derived from the same root and are opposites.

[@DougsDharma]

🙏

[@bahadursunny1674]

Are you bengali?

[@thegoodnamesaretaken]

Thank you Doug! Interesting, as always! I think we suffer less when we minimize greed, hatred and delusion. I would find it interesting to see what modern science (psychology and neurology maybe) has to say about minimizing suffering and how one person can evolve in that regard (to what extent can the same person become less greedy, hateful and deluded and to what extent does it make them happier).

[@DougsDharma]

Yes it's a good question!

[@xiaomaozen]

Concise and precise summary. Couldn't have done it any better. 🤣 Thanks, Doug! 🐱🙏

[@DougsDharma]

😄😄

[@leorivers7759]

This kind of clarity in a survey or overview is so beneficial. Although my biases would like to see you hold up a lit candle and then blow it out with a wink!

[@DougsDharma]

🕯️

[@mitrabuddhi]

Hello Doug, I really enjoy the videos you make. I am very grateful for your time. Of course, like others, I have my own opinions about Nibbana, some of which I have already shared with you. Although I didn't receive an answer, I understand that you may be busy and unable to respond. That's why I'm just saying thanks this time. And I wish you health and happiness.

[@KP_Casablanka]

Good video in good timing 👍👍

[@DougsDharma]

Glad to hear it!

[@diansc7322]

was just reading an essay by Bhikkhu Sujato on Thanissaro Bhikkhu's view, perfect timing

[@Paraves426]

what was the essay may I ask?

[@nathanaelarnquist]

For me, what more or less settles my mind on this dilemma is, "Am I free from suffering, knowing I am free from suffering? No? Then I don't want it." Keeping my mind clear on that goal protects me from getting caught up in doubt about my attainments or lack there-of and all those "dark nights of the soul," y'know?

[@DougsDharma]

🙏

[@xlmoriarty8921]

Thanks Doug for the video. What l appreciate is your fantastic picture quality, beautiful color and camera settings, really well done. Question, could you do a series about the differences in zenmeditation techniques. Especially what Dogen means by shikantasa and why he has problem with counting breath.

[@DougsDharma]

Glad you enjoy them! I'm no expert on Dōgen, and tend to focus more on the early material, but I'll keep it in mind in case I run across some good scholarship on this question. I assume you've seen my video on Zen Buddhism? kzbin.info/www/bejne/ooOkiGB9g5mHi6M

[@indraotsutsuki9080]

SN 35.117 “Therefore, bhikkhus, that dimension should be understood, where the eye ceases and perception of forms fades away. That dimension should be understood, where the ear ceases and perception of sounds fades away.… That base should be understood, where the mind ceases and perception of mental phenomena fades away. That base should be understood.”* The monks then go to ask Ananda what the Buddha meant by this. “This was stated by the Blessed One, friends, with reference to the cessation of the six sense bases.” It seems quite clear the Buddha doesn’t describe it as a consciousness, but rather the cessation of all 6 forms of consciousness. But it’s still somehow a realm that is to be understand. Quite paradoxical.

[@joltee9317]

The dimension which is without aspects of other dimensions sounds a bit like how mahayana buddhists talk about emptiness or the notion of two truths. I mean there seems to be some overlap which is interesting considering that's an early sutta. On another point, In a way the inflationary and even the deflationary descriptions serve as pointers to the ineffable nature of enlightenment, so don't seem that different to the apathetic perspective. Thanks for the video. Very interesting and well explained.

[@PR-tq8yo]

Please tell me this. What is the motivation to attain Nirvana? When there is no self according to Buddhism,.. there is no individual soul or consciousness that is unique to an individual , then why do I care whether the aggregates come together in the next birth (again, you can't call it is as MY rebirth because there is no I or ME in Buddhism). If my life is alright and I am not going through a lot of dukkha (frustration) and I am for the most part, an ethical human being, then WHY should I care about going the spiritual path to attain Nirvana? If what we have in this word is NOT the ultimate reality, and I am not ME as a separate entity/soul, then why the heck should I care what happens to my aggregates? If the goal of Buddhism is to REMOVE consciousness,n the one that FEELS and is aware of dukkha, then theoretically, if all sentient beings were to evaporate because of a meteor colliding with earth or Nuclear holocaust or whatever, then that ALSO solves the problem of more sentient beings coming into Samsaara. There are simply too many illogical things I see.

[@DougsDharma]

The reason for practice is to reduce the suffering in your life.

[@PR-tq8yo]

@@DougsDharma Not sure you are answering the question. One's current life's suffering can be educed by making different life choices as well. My question is specific to attainment of Nirvana and how it benefits the current group of aggregates that a human being is comprised of, when those aggregates don't retain their integrity in the next birth. All human beings at the moment, are let's say, blissfully unaware of their past lives. So if the point of view is restricted to the current life at a given time, then those sufferings can be eliminated by other means too. Nirvana is not meant for the current life necessarily, it is to "blow out" of existence and thus eliminate suffering completely forever. But why should one care when a> we are only cognizant of our current life at a given point and b> we don't have a permanent identity/self that sticks with us in our future births.

[@johnmonk3381]

​@@PR-tq8yoYou don't have to attain nirvana if you feel it's pointless. Nirvana has a deeply symbolic and ultimately personal meaning to different people. Technically, if you are already happy with the way things are, then you have already achieved nirvana!

[@hammersaw3135]

I saw it, Nirvana is supreme bliss, it was life changing but not permanent. It takes either breaking out of a long time suffering, or a long time practice involved in getting there, keeping this bliss probably takes serious vigilance against temptation.

[@uncleurda8101]

Then it wouldn't be Nirvana if it weren't permanent. If you reach a non-dual state beyond the conception of permanence and impermanence, you wouldn't come back to duality believing it is impermanent. Hell, what only makes it "permanent" to the dualistic mind is that it is undying. However, it was never born to begin with.

[@hammersaw3135]

@@uncleurda8101 Right, thanks for the advice. I just mean a good way to lose it is by grasping it.

[@ndril]

Regarding the Mahayana style of nirvana, I did not really understand how it's thought to be compatible with the Buddhism of the Pali canon until I read the Lotus Sutra. Or, maybe it's better to say: the Lotus Sutra just admits that it's not compatible actually, and the non-Mahayana teachings were "skillful means," not the literal truth. Many pages are spent dancing around the topic, trying very hard not to say that the Lotus Sutra rejects the ideas in the earlier writings. I understand the dissatisfaction with the earlier ideas though, particularly if one accepts the supernatural elements: if there really are people of transcendent wisdom and compassion, who also have capabilities greater than the gods, does it make sense that they would leave us behind?

[@DougsDharma]

Thanks for this, I'll be out with a few videos on skillful means in a few weeks.

[@markbrad123]

I did hear some tales of people falsely thinking monks had died being in a deep silent stillness and pathologists getting a shock.

[@sonamtshering194]

Nirvana and its descriptions reminds me of the Zen analogy of "The Finger Pointing to the Moon" where we shouldn't mistake the Finger as the Moon. Likewise the Descriptions aren't Nirvana, just a point of reference in one's Dharma practice. On another note, it has been said that two people who have gone through the same experience describe it differently when asked about it. Hence even the experience of the mundane is expressed differently, so similarly I think the description of Nirvana for the ones who attained it would be different from the others who have experienced it as well

[@DougsDharma]

Interesting point, the descriptions given of nirvana seem like they would have to be universal for it to be the true goal.

[@OpenSourceAnarchist]

Doug, I know this would be a huge ask, but do you have any videos or would be able to make some to help me understand Dzogchen, Mipham's "Beacon of Certainty", and the notion of rigpa itself? I feel equally compelled by both Theravada and Dzogchen traditions and texts but am having trouble understanding how Mipham's work is viewed from the perspective of the other schools.

[@DougsDharma]

It's not something I am knowledgeable enough about to make a video about, as most of my focus is on the earlier materials and this is quite late. I may do one in the future if and when I can find good, comprehensive scholarship on its historical origins.

[@KeyboardPlaysGames]

First council was oral recitation only. Janice Nattier from Harvard, and Charles Prebish from Penn State have both done in depth analysis on the Mahasamghikas, in their academic Mahasamghika origins. Most scholars (such as the aforementioned) understand the Mahasamghikas indeed have the oldest Vinaya, lredsting both Theravada and Mahayana. The Mahasamghika believed in eternal Buddha, this was before the second council, and the writing down of the Pali cannon. So, Historically speaking doug, eternal Buddha idea is the earliest belief of Buddha, long before the Pali cannon at the third council centuries later.

[@DougsDharma]

Sutta and Vinaya are different, scholars believe the Vinaya was elaborated later.

[@KeyboardPlaysGames]

@@DougsDharma Hey Doug, thanks for responding 😊That's correct. I'm trying to point out that modern day Mahayana belief of eternal Buddha (Not sutras obviously) but, the belief itself, predates Theravada and Mahayana. The academic by Harvard and Penn state I cited, has proven beyond reasonable doubt the Sthaviras are the ones who altered the original Vinaya. Likewise the Theravada narrative is that the Mahasamghikas were the defect group, and wanted less stringent rules. In the academic I cited, the opposite is shown to be true from historical evidence, current scholars (myself included) study the Mahasamghika Vinaya as it is the oldest, much older than the Sthaviravada Vinaya, so indeed from a historical standpoint the Theravada account of the split at second council, is not only in accurate, it is totally opposite. I'm a scholar, so I'm not here to argue a religious narrative within the Pali Cannon, I am only providing evidence and thus far there has no no rebuttals to Janice Nattier and Charles Prebish, it has stood as conclusive for quite a long time. . I guess the primary place I was pivoting this from, was that this same original group, the Mahasamghikas, had a list of doctrine, and it included that the Buddha was transcendent and eternal. This belief was held by the group a mere 116 years after the Buddha death. So academically, it's incorrect to say the eternal Buddha stance is a "later development", when it actually predates Theravada and Mahayana. I highly recommend reading the source I provided. J. Nattier, and C. Prebish are extremely thorough on their work in Mahasamghika Origins: The Beginnings of Buddhist Sectarian ism, is extremely well done, and showcases behind reasonable doubt that the Pali cannon version of the second council split, has no bearing in actual historical evidence, and Infact it was the Sthaviravada (to be Theravada) who were the ones altering and changing the original Vinaya, which caused the split at second council, as the Mahasamghikas wanted the original Buddha Vinaya. I think you'd love the read, it'd right up your lane, take a peek at it, and thanks again for your incredible content 🙏 I was trying to say the second split was a cause of Vinaya issues according to scholars. I was pivoting that to prove as the academic does, that not only the Vinaya they held pre dates sthraviras, but also the beliefs they held which include eternal Buddha do as well.

[@hansenmarc]

I’m wondering what your thoughts are on the purported equivalence between cessation, nirodha-samāpatti, and nirvana? I recently heard sensei Stephen Snyder say, “Cessation is the same as Nirvana in Theravada Buddhism.”

[@DougsDharma]

I dealt with some of that in this video about the cessation of perception and feeling: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5uqn5Sth52aiJI

[@hansenmarc]

@@DougsDharma thank you

[@redbaron2455]

Sometimes when I meditate, once in a while I feel like everything is going by and thats fine. I feel quiet, subtle and serene. Its only temporary but i wonder if that comes close to what nirvana is like?

[@DougsDharma]

Well if it's a kind of calm and freedom, it's at least going in the right direction. I wouldn't worry too much about the rest.

[@MaungMaungOo23]

When someone attains Nirvana, he or she becomes the very fabrics of the whole existence.

[@stevebelzer4758]

“What needs to be done , has been done - there is nothing further .Ignorance was banished knowledge. arose .” Next task is for me to look up ONTOLOGICAL- is that in the Pali Cannon ❤

[@DougsDharma]

😄 It's a term in metaphysics. If you want a video about early Buddhist metaphysics, see for example: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gp_dYoKCirSIl7M

[@StarseedAgeofAquarius]

It relates to the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being. "ontological arguments" 🤔

[@joltee9317]

I was wondering if buddha ever said anything about difficult family relationships and how to deal with them. Particularly parents. Have you have ever done a video on this?

[@DougsDharma]

He didn't have a whole lot to say on that subject. I've done a couple of related videos, one on practicing with those close to you: kzbin.info/www/bejne/onK5l6yNaLiSmrs , and another on the Buddha's family: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fX_YoKengJacrNE . They might be useful.

[@joltee9317]

Thanks, I'll check them out. I've always thought that ethical behaviour should be applied to everyone equally, but i seem to recall reading something by perhaps a Mahayana lineage saying that it was particularly harmful karmically to behave poorly to one's parents. Like one has to be better to their parents regardless of how they treat you.

[@Che_Guna]

☸️🙏🛐

[@kricketflyd111]

I suppose nirvana would be a part of evolving, necessary senses reached in preparation for God's kingdom. Image being of water and spirit not having a body and being dependent on your senses.

[@mr.morrist4975]

This’s quite confusing. On one hand I’ve heard about “vimutti”, “ceto vimutti”. Some have said the Buddha said “ceto vimutti” liberation of the mind. Citta is liberated not obliterated, I guess. But some said nothing will be left even citta, original citta.

[@DougsDharma]

I would take liberation of mind as another way to discuss enlightenment, rather than nirvana per se.

[@alakso777]

🙏🏼

[@KhushiSingh-zn1zv]

Sir is suffering inevitable or it is optional

[@DougsDharma]

It's inevitable so long as we persist in craving and clinging to things.

[@jovieportillo9828]

If there is only bliss, then who or what is the which has become bliss? Or entered nirvana ? If Bliss or emptiness remains experiencing itself then isn’t this any different from the Hindu concept of Brahman or Atma ? The only differences being that Hindus approach this using positive language while Buddhism approaches it using negative language (full/ the fullness vs empty/emptiness ) But ultimately referring to the same state of being ?

[@Hermit_mouse]

Smells like Buddha nature

[@TheWayOfRespectAndKindness]

Perhaps nirvana is simply peaceful awareness... to be at rest with the flow of causality. It seems antithetical to speak of nirvana in grandiose terms.

[@skrrskrr99]

My question is, if im looking at this from an empirical naturalistic point of view, nirvana seems like what happens when we die. If we die and the body and mind end, with nothing coming after and nothing being remembered before, why even bother trying to attain nirvana at all? For the most part, it seems unattainable without great focus and effort in life. It doesn't seem like a worthy goal to spend one's entire life to achieve. Wouldn't it be better to just do whatever you want and know when you die it's all over and suffering ends anyways?

[@DougsDharma]

The point of all practice is to reduce suffering. Whether or not all suffering ends at death is irrelevant to the question as to whether and how we might go about reducing it during this lifetime.

[@skrrskrr99]

@DougsDharma I'm there and practicing but not expecting or having any hopes of even glimpsing nibbana or enlightenment. The concept of nibbana seems far-fetched to me, but the benefits of buddhism here and now are helpful in general. I definitely love the content. Appreciate you, Doug 🙏♥️🙌

[@johnmonk3381]

​@@skrrskrr99But you are not dead, are you? Nirvana is achievable, to me, it means reducing obsession and control. Practicing restraint. Uncurbed human desires can be deeper and more vast than the deepest oceans. But having no desires is impossible too, as long as you are alive. Therefore, the middle way is the best way to get the most contentment out of life, it's okay to set expectations and goals in your life, but try not to get too obsessed over them

[@Edward-yd3zr]

In his celestial journey, Mohammed met Moses and Jesus. And when he reach the highest heaven, it is absolutely silent. Meaning, it is totally empty. Is the Abrahamic highest heaven, the selfsame buddhic Void of Nirvana, the ultimate reality?

[@blootwoseassy2188]

nir vana, nir means without

[@AscendingGuru]

I have been chasing this nirvana for a bit. Here is what I have found, that seems to be feasible: States of relaxation with focus, alpha, beta, theta, delta and gamma, seemingly dead and hibernation. These are attainable, these are documented. I know some of these are attainable, even if never you have done so in your life, view learning something called focus 21, using the gateway tapes of CIA. Some yogis have been measured seemingly dead, for example Sadhguru. And hibernation is when they just meditate for days and don't wake up before starvation is intense enough, this phenomena is well known in Buddhism, documented to have been achieved by multiple practitioners. All I can say is that the more you play around with it, the deeper you go, the trippier it gets. I once saw the guy holding the Tibetan Wheel of Samsara, but the painting cartoon character, not like an actual cowheaded tauron. I also once saw a buddhist monk thing manifest, but only nerves and blood circulation system, and a few others. He eminated at me with the symbol of buddhas eyes, because his face did just gave skin grafted on top of it, no mouth, He looked like old no mask x-man deadpool.

[@FactsCountdown]

If we stop having kids then no one will suffer and no one will need Nirvana or moksha.

[@incredulity]

Do you believe that the self is annihilated after death?

[@FactsCountdown]

@@incredulity every thing comes from nothingness and goes back to nothingness.

[@incredulity]

@@FactsCountdown Have you seen your self appearing from nothingness?

[@khayon4364]

That isn't how Buddhism works - Reincarnation means "stop having kids" doesn't actually affect anything within the Buddhist worldview. Having a child in Buddhism is actually considered a blessing and a *positive* act. The Tibetan term for it is "precious human birth" given its rarity in this world of karma an reincarnation.

[@FactsCountdown]

@@khayon4364 Life is suffering then why you want to inflict suffering on your children by bringing them into this world.

[@saralamuni]

The reality of your own self-nature, the absence of cause and effect, is what's meant by mind. Your mind is nirvana.

[@sebozz2046]

I deny Jesus

[@corydonathan9169]

Cringe

[@jojoGetBack]

Ok

[@gendashwhy]

Who?

[@movewitoutmotion769]

Alrighty

[@aaronsmith1474]

@@corydonathan9169 Jesus is cringe

[@luizr.5599]

As a very secular-minded meditator, I believe Nibbana is a useless concept. Our practice shouldn't aim at some esoteric concept, linked to ascetic ideals. We have to try and live better lives and be better people. No such "enlightenment" ideas make sense in realistic psychology.

[@DougsDharma]

Maybe so. I'll deal with that question soon.

[@johnmonk3381]

That only applies if you think nibbana is a commonly held objective that concept applies to everyone equally, which then becomes a common "destination". Well why couldn't nibbana become a symbolic and uniquely personal experience for that person? Everyone defines what their nibbana is. Then this ideal is worth striving for because it reduces suffering by reducing attachments. Remember too that suffering, in the strict buddhist context, means personal suffering not general suffering. The buddha, stumbled upon enlightenment while he was seeking answers to his own suffering not others. It turned out his sufferings are shared by the vast majority of the people as well. Fear of illness, death etc, perceiving the impermanent as permanent. And resisting change. If you discover a way or ways that help you overcome these fears, why wouldn't this be a noble goal for everyone?

[@ChristosBeest]

Agios o Satanas

[@หมูจังเลย]

มี ไม่มี ไม่มี มี