Dr Craig Wright & Jimmy Nguyen | Bitcoin and Blockchain | Oxford Union

SUBSCRIBE for more speakers ► is.gd/OxfordUnion
Oxford Union on Facebook: / theoxfordunion
Oxford Union on Twitter: @OxfordUnion
Website: www.oxford-union.org/
An Australian computer scientist and businessman, Wright has claimed to be the engine of the team that created Bitcoin and the true identity of “Satoshi Nakamoto”. He will be joined by his business partner Jimmy Nguyen, the CEO of nChain. Together they aim to restore the original Bitcoin protocol, to keep it stable, and to enable massive on-chain scaling, to promote the global growth of their new Bitcoin SV. With all of Bitcoin’s recent controversy, they aim to restore its place as the dominant and safe global cryptocurrency.
ABOUT THE OXFORD UNION SOCIETY: The Oxford Union is the world's most prestigious debating society, with an unparalleled reputation for bringing international guests and speakers to Oxford. Since 1823, the Union has been promoting debate and discussion not just in Oxford University, but across the globe.

[@cunt4003]

Why would you give a known FRAUD a platform like this? SAD!

[@INeedsMoneys]

Because he paid them A LOT. Money rules the world sadly. And faketoshi is rich as fuk

[@TheAndroidRobot]

Still get roasted. I am glad, he’s there, so the world can see his fraudulent.

[@-ED-]

The only people who are actually FRAUDS are people who accuse Craig of being a fraud. There is absolutely nothing fraudulent about original Bitcoin and BSV that maintains it, BSV is literally THE BEST WORKING BLOCKCHAIN there is by great margin, so anyone that wants to keep calling BSV a scam is outright completely ignorant or frauds themselves, as only ignorant people can not see this, or if they do yet they still continue with such narrative, can only be frauds themselves. Of the thousands of actual frauds with all the shitcoins and tokens who never achieved anything other than making their creators and few traders richer, BSV and Craig have never defrauded anyone, BSV is actually the only blockchian that scales, build for the global use, and Craig has never taken a cent from anyone, unlike the thousands of ICO creators who stole hundreds of millions from unaware (and stupid/greedy) so called "investors". PS: your username is cunt400 for a reason... it suits you perfectly.... and I bet your account is one of the many FAKE accounts created to mislead people the way MSM do it, by repeating the same lies over and over, till the people believe them. Shame on you asshole.

[@INeedsMoneys]

Hahahahaha

[@INeedsMoneys]

@@-ED- crack is one hell of a drug

[@LaurentiArnault]

Through many awkward moments, there are some glimpses of a genius mind. Great job OxfordUnion team for inviting such a controversial figure (at least at this point in time) and post the talk on KZbin. Sooner or later, the truth will come out. But, right now, what matters the most is you respecting your core values and allowing freedom of speech. Thank you.

[@westimsterkonek1315]

Well said!

[@anaalves8966]

That's why I love Oxford

[@marksmith9405]

true

[@bailord8249]

dude, he paid his way to be there, lol. they didnt invite him.

[@bellabelmondo915]

This has to be the most thoughtful comment in here

[@jantuwawn]

Litecoin is doing so well Craig Wright will soon be claiming he’s Charlie Lee.

[@enzofer2125]

😂

[@gianf3952]

Says Alex Svanevik

[@iqcreative6115]

Well with his Vietnamese adoption son that would make sense 😁

[@mranderson3277]

That's the funniest shit i've read all day. He'd probably let his bitch Nguyen claim he's Charlie Lee.

[@MrAndersJensen]

Pardon my curiosity but are you guys lefties?

[@JanKosowski]

51:37 "I think that answers my question." 10/10

[@sdara357]

Name calling is his only defence

[@wangniwei]

The question is answered. It is just not what the kid wanted to hear. The point of bitcoin idea is to keep an immutable ledger for accounting (aka history). Using the mutable internet archive to attack the founder of bitcoin is a clear indicator that Oxford kids are losing their IQ points.

[@JanKosowski]

@@wangniwei "The kid" was pretty satisfied with the answer. You must click in the wrong timestamp.

[@userx2079]

"Kid" made one mistake. I'll say what mistake after COPA.

[@GreenBoiler]

1TB blocks? every 10 minutes??... 144 TB/day... 1 Petabyte a week.... I'm not sure how many node operator will continue to persist the blockchain at that cost. Miners secure the blockchain's future (w/ competitive fee market). Nodes secure the blockchain's past (w/ longest chain). If the cost of running a node (verifying miners are producing valid blocks) increases, causing node operators shutdown, the single node/group/miner that remains has the ability to rewrite the past, thus has total control of the network.

[@Torrnintwo]

@ ɃoilerRoom I agree. Just how is the average person going to keep the chain on their personal pc to run a node if blocks are 1tb, that's insane. Most peoples HDD space is gone in an hour. I think it will make btc sv really centralised, only big data storage providers could do this and for how long? If it comes to environmental issues consider the energy but with this consider the mining that would be needed to make all these new hdd's. It doesn't seem practice or logical. Someone prove me wrong and I will consider it, but at this time I don't see it.

[@zacharycebu]

@@Torrnintwo centralized, right, exactly what Bitcoin should not be. These guys are trying to get rich, and doing well so far.

[@shikari94]

BitCoin is supposed to scale massively. We're talking Google level datacenters, world wide, running nodes just like Satoshi claimed in the whitepaper. Look at Craig's claims for EDI. Massively cheaper and magnitudes more efficient with giant BitCoin blocks. When we have massive corporations running BitCoin for their own database purposes, and EDI (which is legally required for them to run) we'll have a massive blockchain decentralized by massive entities. Nobody cares about hobby raspberry Pi nodes. Not what Satoshi had in mind.

[@wrongthink1212]

@@shikari94 I don't see how large companies will want to be mining some shitcoin named 'Satoshis Vision' .... cringe...

[@shikari94]

@@wrongthink1212 reread what I stated about EDI. Large blocks (of which nChain and CoinGeek are the only ones to invest into scaling for massive worldwide use) will be largely attractive to any large corp. The cost of storing data on servers will be so much more cheaper and secure years down the road, when blocks are uncapped. Literally no other coin can scale and hold use cases like BitCoin. Satoshi Vision is just a ticker name, based on what Satoshi saw for the future of Blockchain and utilization. The coin is BitCoin, and I don't care what exchanges call it, since they will all crumble in due time. If you care nothing about adoption but just price/ticker names, you don't get it. Have a nice life.

[@izakmizrahi8569]

I'm one of the very few who believes CSW = Satoshi. IMO he had a lot of help from David K. He's just not PC - it's an Aussie thing.

[@Tinfed]

I'm an aussie and nah this isn't an aussie thing.

[@izakmizrahi8569]

@@Tinfed I'm an Aussie and yeah it is

[@j.t.k.ventures9887]

Lol the guy has asperges....being politely social able is not in his DNA.. to his credit he eluded to it in his talks.

[@MarkT]

Love it when Craig stands up and Jimmy gets N_erv_ous!

[@zacharycebu]

What you're viewing here is what a completely centralized cryptocurrency looks like.

[@DB-gf5gu]

Wrong, protocol is set in stone, that's how it's decentralized.

[@zacharycebu]

@@DB-gf5gu Stop lying to people please, BSV is the most centralized of all the fake Bitcoins.

[@entertainity]

Brilliant. All this hate is crazy. Let the man speak, and listen, and criticize in a factual manner if you have something to say.

[@mevr.wilpalen1209]

Nguyen the lawyer explaining the technical aspects of scaling.. priceless!

[@SATOSHI.-Nakamoto]

You do realize that this guy is not me. www.google.com/search?q=who+is+Christopher+Soper+to+bitcoin&oq=who+i&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59l3.4594j0j4&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

[@DegreesOfThree]

I guess your feeble mind can't fathom someone being knowledgeable in more than one subject.

[@vlnow]

51:37 he got his question answered in the best best way imaginable,

[@icthelightatnight]

It's hard to accept the truth. Especially when it affects your bag.

[@visualintent]

Yes. The poor fools that invested in BSV.

[@-ED-]

@@visualintent BSV will do what Bitcoin was created to do, and you will be crawling back saying how you were stupid and couldn't see the obvious, you are still just trolling and clueless. I wonder, why did you subscribe to my channel if you think BSV is such shit? I think you know what is going on already, you just didn't get to admit it yet.

[@dario.6825]

@@-ED- No, even worse. they will be crawling back denying they were ever against it. It will be the following narrative by 99% of them ; I always knew Craig is Satoshi, I always knew SV is the real Bitcoin bla bla bla.. the only difference is that they will pay much higher price to be a part of it.

[@antonnym563]

This video will be a great meme in a view years. Bitcoooonnect

[@-ED-]

@@antonnym563 you are stupid also.

[@zugzug9969]

I am starting to understand more each day. Very interesting information here.

[@KlausLovgreen]

49:00 says it all

[@mtscott44]

It's astonishing. It's like he thinks that saying it out loud makes it all okay? Not long to go now.

[@John-wf5if]

He is getting destroyed in court.

[@DanHomeAtLast]

​@@John-wf5if where? Not from what we are seeing from today.

[@zugzug9969]

We are equal in law.

[@dizonchrystophercasero7045]

Anagram Craig Wright? Is there any Satoshi name included?

[@LichaelMewis]

When was this event?

[@antonlanoe4060]

www.oxford-union.org/node/1937 Google is your friend ;-)

[@paulburket]

Like him or hate him, you have to respect the fact Craig shares his true opinion regardless of the audience. Intellectual honesty is in short supply these days, crypto needs more people like him.

[@frankdowns4425]

LOL! The narrative was he stormed out after being questioned by the audience about the wired article. The truth is, he didn't walk out and fake news was created by the same people again. Yes, an example of the fake evidence he described during the talk, was created about this talk. Thanks for posting this.

[@ryanxcharles]

haha, yes, exactly

[@jcpocket9503]

In this link on reddit Craig admits he created those fake blog posts to "throw wired" Now he forgets and lies and calls it fake news and you believe him. np.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6xkn24/bcc_bch_are_bitcoin_they_follow_the_whitepaper/dmjcyou/?context=3

[@stevenoconnell6297]

That was awkward and uncomfortable. Craig Wright is all over the place. Verbal communicative ADHD maybe? He can’t give a focused response to a specific question ever. At least he’s being more transparent (intentionally or not) with the fact that his “vision” is to preserve the established status quo and the long standing rule of law and presumably control structure of the monetary elites. He as much as admits that his vision is basically a globally reaching, omnipotent and omnipresent digital version of the exact same world we are currently living in. He’s not a very good communicator and while I don’t really like him nor believe that he is the creator of bitcoin I do try to listen to this camp as I believe it is important to sincerely consider every perspective on the direction we journey ahead with on this new frontier as it has incredible consequences. While I lean more on the side of decentralization and individual liberties and sovereignty combined with a very limited governance it’s definitely worth pondering whether we really want to go away from the “western culture” and rule of law that we have established over such a long period of time. And then there is the fact that it’s not likely at all that we actually do inherit a new world free from financial and government tyranny as the current elite are not likely to sit idly by and let it happen and we don’t REALLY know or have any control over where all this crypto/digital shit is coming from and certainly not where it’s headed. I for one think one of the wisest things a person could do right now is learn about, prepare and establish an anonymous presence in the digital world and familiarize yourself with how to operate anonymously in a world of complete transparency and surveillance. A world where your every action (or keystroke) whether in the physical realm or the digital, is perfectly reviewable by at least one single entity and potentially even by any and everyone who wants to. Then again, we could just have a global war that sends us all back to the Stone Age. If we had worked on ourselves as human beings and a species wide community as much as we have worked on technological development and economic growth and thus were generally a more enlightened and ascended people we could begin creating a sustainable utopia right now where none suffer due to unnatural causes and all live with abundance and purpose. For some strange reason I just don’t think that future is something we are going to allow ourselves to have.. It’s a real shame.

[@KennethGriffith_International]

I believe CSW is Satoshi as he claims. But, I also believe the vision of total surveillance and pre-crime monitoring that he gives in this video is extremely disturbing. Wright is clearly the original Bitcoin maximalist. He is a true believer. That being said, his dream will never come true. One ledger to rule the world, one ledger to find them, one ledger to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.

[@naviddadkhah4485]

I do think CSW is Satoshi otherwise he wouldn't want to go to court and prove it. so he must have solid evidence. the decentralization and liberetian is just a lie. I we saw what happened during the unregulated ICO boom in 2017-18 that all these youtubers and shitcoins CEOs were trying to rub people to buy their coins and then dumped on them. they want the government go away so they can rub people easier. If craig was a fraud and wanted to get rich, wouldn't be easier for him back in 2015 to just make a coin like litecoin or etherium or eos?

[@stevenoconnell6297]

Navid Dadkhah I understand your dislike of fraud and people being taken for a loss so some fraudsters can get rich quick. Personally though I believe with conviction that a free market better filters out fraud than regulation. Let me explain. So crypto ico’s are a perfect example; brand new, completely free from regulations and controls and yes naturally unfortunately a new and unknown market is rife with fraud as consumers are unaware. The ICO’s are a perfect example of this. But as a result, government does their job and prosecutes as many fraudsters as possible and puts them in jail and people become far more careful and do their due diligence in the future. Those 2 factors alone are what eliminates the fraud. It’s sad that some people will take a hit but you have to be allowed to fail in order to learn and grow. The alternative is to have regulations which are always overreaching and will eliminate competition and ensure that a few monopolies control the market and we end up with a couple dominating corporations, and 1% of people reaping all the financial rewards while 99% have no opportunity to benefit nor compete as they will be swallowed up by the government backed monopolies. And even if the regulation comes, what is it that makes you think there will no longer be fraud? Fraud is naturally against the law so anyone participating in a fraudulent enterprise wouldn’t concern themselves with laws and regulations anyways. Just like how criminals don’t buy licensed firearms. They are criminals. The only people who adhere to regulations are law abiding, honest citizens and they are the ones who lose in the end because of it. Lastly, I do NOT believe that the spirit in which bitcoin was created is one of government regulations and corporate monopolies but rather one of freedom, liberty, free markets, non government intervention, sovereignty over ones own money and property and don’t forget the right to privacy and the ability to participate in unregulated marketplaces with anonymity. If that wasn’t the point of bitcoin then what is? We already have digital transactions.

[@jimm9162]

Craig schooled Oxford. "You're all privileged". This is the funniest and best CSW event I've ever seen. Craig owned and triggered them all with the truth, the truth about what's the real Bitcoin, the truth about law, and the truth about society. Hats off to Satoshi Nakamoto, the genius of Craig Steven Wright.

[@antoz8229]

He always owns the bitcoin argument but the haters never like to show his arguments they just scream scammer

[@alexocasio-gomez5267]

Why did Satoshi become a scammer and forget how to sign with his private keys? Why won't he just admit that he forgot how to use bitcoin instead of providing dozens of fake proofs?

[@antoz8229]

@@alexocasio-gomez5267 he will show private keys after court be patient little one

[@alexocasio-gomez5267]

@@antoz8229 Brag about it after he does it. He has already faked signing it multiple times. If he just keeps trying different ways to fake it maybe one day he'll fool more than a few people. Anybody could prove it like that.

[@antoz8229]

@@alexocasio-gomez5267 you obviously are just a puppet who actually hasn't studied any of CSW side. It's called CSW derangement syndrome

[@traderbean-btc485]

Hard to watch Faketoshi go off on one and start talking gibberish. I feel sorry for the man. Very sad to watch.

[@W0RLDP34CE]

I feel repulsed and disgusted by him myself

[@traderbean-btc485]

@@W0RLDP34CE +1

[@frodobaggins7469]

He is satoshi, you just bashed the creator of bitcoin, the most revolutionary technology since the internet.

[@SATOSHI.-Nakamoto]

www.google.com/search?q=who+is+Christopher+Soper+to+bitcoin&oq=who+i&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59l3.4594j0j4&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

[@SATOSHI.-Nakamoto]

@@frodobaggins7469 actually I'm 43 from California and my name is Christopher Soper. www.google.com/search?q=who+is+Christopher+Soper+to+bitcoin&oq=who+i&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j69i59l3.4594j0j4&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

[@hypesquirrel4974]

Brilliant :D Another fantastic talk coming from the Oxford Union!

[@volbolt99]

wait a minute.. isnt that the real Satoshi Nakamoto in the crowd at 51:01?

[@TheMasterNinjaRyu]

Hahahaha classic comment. Can't stop laughing. Especially because he takes his phone camera out too, probably saying to himself "so you wana take credit for my work do ya, let me just pass your mugshot on to the Yakuza byatch!"

[@jimgauth]

Polymaths are fun to listen to. He's one of the few people I can't listen to at 1.5x

[@ryanxcharles]

Not only that, but I have to watch over and over again to get everything. Even then I don't think I get everything.

[@Arbitraging]

@@ryanxcharles his worldview is quite the contrast compared to the average crypto advocate. When you look at the world empirically, you can easily see which worldview has the least resistance towards their objective, I am not sure if that will be sufficient tho.

[@jimm9162]

@@ryanxcharles any word about Paymail and DNS security?

[@capaldi328]

If this is Oxford I'm glad I went to community college.

[@ak7443]

Can't decide who is more ridiculous - Craig for faking or Jimmy for believing in him! Also, OXford - i thought you people were supposed to be smart???? why give this guy a platform?

[@bilthon]

Money talks I guess. Still lame.

[@PumpkinToshi]

A K You need to really watch from the 40 minute mark when he does the Q/A This video isn't just about giving him a platform it's also about making him look like a fool

[@jayzhang8214]

keep making questions, you wiil find you was wrong :)

[@ak7443]

@@jayzhang8214 you mean keep asking questions, you will find you were wrong :) english basics first then let's proceed

[@mikedemike5393]

nearly as smart as people from the USA who think satoshi is a yank...who has a soft spot for the London times...and surely a US citizen would quote new york times...or a similar west coast news rag....

[@veritas.liberabit]

You have no idea ladies and gentlemen. I am going to tell you right now that whatever you perceive to be the state of the art blockchain technology, any blockchain technology, in secret ladies and gentlemen Craig Wright is at least a very bare minimum fifty to a hundred years ahead beyond what you can even imagine.

[@bailord8249]

bro you posted cringe

[@davidraborn3654]

WTF? Guys a scam artist and you people are falling for it. Look into the Wiki history of Craig Wright, and see how he went back and changed a webpage then claimmed to be "Satoshi Nakomoto". Data showes when he did it. Guy cannot move one satoshi from a "Satoshi" wallet. People check this guy out before you invest in BitcoinSV, or he will be flying off with your money and leave you holding the bag. I gotta respect his come back plan thou, nobody saw that comming. But buying the "Copyrights" to the whitpapers of an "Open Source" project does not make you it's developer.

[@alexocasio-gomez5267]

@Shadow Banned Which of Craigs many fake proof convinced you that he is Satoshi? All of you fake Craig fans talk about "do your research" but none of you can tell us what your research found that convinced you. Maybe you found some money in your bank account or you are just a fake botnet account.

[@darith770]

He's a fraud.

[@DylanFowler]

@Shadow Banned evidence?

[@przechodzien]

Less than 2 hours and all the bots and trolls are already here :D Great speech from Craig and Jimmy.

[@CushtyCrypto]

bloody hell... Nuff said

[@exitmass]

Truth supersedes Twitter consensus. Thank God.

[@LuckyLucky-ec1yu]

#BSV is the real BITCOIN! This Craig dude was misunderstood - super genius! Ruling will come in as BSV is the real BITCOIN and BlackRock has open - ETF (where tech meets needs)

[@liminal6823]

A timeless classic 🍷

[@iveybenjamin3891]

Sheesh that last 10min of the interview is something i never really thought about but makes perfect sense.

[@adamconnolly2899]

@Space Is the Place If he misunderstood the definition of equality than so did I! Am I wrong in understanding that there are two discrete forms of equality - equality in law (aka opportunity) and equality in outcome?

[@flagermusen]

@@adamconnolly2899 Communists want to conflate the two, because their ideology rests on the principle of equality of outcome. Which is of course an absolutely insane and totally impossible concept.

[@Scalia-ig6qz]

These guys would make a great podcast with #JoeRogan

[@ekids.bassment]

No they don't

[@saltyapple1238]

This is super unrelated and will probably never happen but can we quickly just take some time to appreciate how funny it would be if Tyler the creator was interviewed here.

[@KuopassaTv]

Is it you Mr. Maxwell?

[@favouritethings11]

Lol

[@hayak6094]

thank you craig

[@FHahn]

finally uploaded! thanks! craig wright is awesome

[@OrimarDez]

Who is the lady presenting? She sounds privileged in her questions at the end. Shoot. I lived what csw explained. I am 36yrs old and fought against the world to actually compete from the haves and I still can win. I just know the game is rigged so once I see it, I stop why if the game is rigged to have those attend OxfordUnion to succeed I could probably out reach their professors. But I don’t want that box. Respect Dr. Wright. I’m not a titled man, but I’ll give respect where it’s due. Bsv is what gives us have nots a chance. So In the most simplest terms. I’m coming for you.. Havers. Not your families or team. You as a equal human if you try to take mine.

[@doemaarwat45]

They talk about trust. I have a question for them: which of the two situations sounds more trustworthy: 1. A limited group of similar people (in this case, people that can pay for a BSV mining farm) tell you what the current balance of the ledger is; Or 2. A unlimited/uncapped group of different types of people (age, wealth, background) that all tell you what the balance of your ledger is. It is not only that more people/miners means more trust, but also that the miners are different types of people (a fair representation of the society) so that certain groups do not take advantage over others.

[@jerichojohnson3219]

2

[@TheMarmite09]

Who is Jimmy Nguyen out of interest and what authority does he have exactly?

[@spiritusinfinitus]

Lol. Hilarious. At least he didn't go into full on sweary rage mode (as is often the case when he's put on the back foot) after the interesting conversation at 44:35 Wright is spouting more of his nonsense. The page IS saved for everyone to see. The snapshot of CSW's own Blogspot webpage entry that he originally created on Tuesday, 26th August 2008 and was archived (before Wright had made any claim to be Satoshi) on 2nd June 2014 contained the line: "Tomorrow - back to the DNS paper, my statistics dissertation and work.". When a snapshot of the same page was taken on 25th May 2015 the text had been edited in the interim to read: "Tomorrow - back to the DNS paper, my statistics dissertation and work. *I have a cryptocurrency paper out soon. Twenty years. Triple entry book keeping. BDO was good for something.*" It isn't some nefarious, untrustworthy website that has archived the page as Craig implies. It's the Internet Archive - "a non-profit library of millions of free books, movies, software, music, websites, and more." It is a trusted and credible source of seeing a webpage as it was on a particular date. Notice during the question from the audience member (which was calmly and softly presented) how Craig's body language becomes defensive, and then he stands up, raises his voice and starts deflecting at that point talking about emails and other nonsense completely not related to the question. At 48:00 he starts to get agitated and Jimmy tries to cover the cracks before Craig loses it at 48:58. More ranting about PDFs, when the question was about Wright's own personal Blogspot website! 50:25 ahh, there's the swearing! Craig S Wright publicly claimed to be Satoshi on 2nd May 2016 (BBC News) following investigations by Gizmodo and Wired in December 2015 (both after the website had been edited sometime between June 2014 and May 2015) Seeing as Mr Wright subsequently deleted his site from the Blogspot platform (which was archived by The Wayback Machine), perhaps anyone facing him in court should ask Google for any archived backups of the Blogspot website user data, including all of the revision data? Oh, he also had other Blogspot sites too. Wink, wink. ;) EDIT: (haha!) CSW's "former lawyer" buddy stated at 47:51 that The Wayback Machine isn't admissible as evidence. He said, "Courts of Law don't accept Wayback Machine printouts as reliable evidence of what a website may or may not have looked like in the past because they're not entirely reliable". Erm.. WRONG! Look up UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS - MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD., Plaintiff, v. PLATTFORM ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Case No. 14-2464-JWL The defendant tried to argue that the Internet Archive's pages weren't admissible because the Wayback Machine doesn't capture everything on the page or update every page from a website on the same date. The judge, after receiving testimony from an Internet Archive employee, disagreed. He found the site to a credible source of preserved evidence -- not just because it captures (for the most part) sites as they were on relevant dates but, more importantly, it does nothing to alter the purity of the preserved evidence.

[@luct3368]

Excellent summary

[@spiritusinfinitus]

And it's important to note that Wired (and Gizmodo) definitely DID reference the doctored pages of Wright's own 2008 blogspot blog post in their investigative article despite Craig denying it in this video where he insisted their claims were based only of faked emails. I quote 'An August 2008 post on Wright’s blog, months before the November 2008 introduction of the bitcoin whitepaper on a cryptography mailing list. It mentions his intention to release a "cryptocurrency paper," and references "triple entry accounting," ' This Wired's 2015 article goes on.. Dropping Breadcrumbs? Despite that overwhelming collection of clues, none of it fully proves that Wright is Nakamoto. All of it could be an elaborate hoax-perhaps orchestrated by Wright himself. The unverified leaked documents could be faked in whole or in part. And most inexplicably of all, comparisons of different archived versions of the three smoking gun posts from Wright’s blog show that he did edit all three-to insert evidence of his bitcoin history. The PGP key associated with Nakamoto’s email address and references to an upcoming "cryptocurrency paper" and "triple entry accounting" were added sometime after 2013. Even the post noting bitcoin’s beta launch is questionable. While it was ostensibly posted in January 2009, it later seems to have been deleted and then undeleted-or possibly even written for the first time-sometime between October 2013 and June of 2014.

[@naviddadkhah4485]

@@spiritusinfinitus he knows all these things and he also knows that other people know these things, yet he's going to court and at minute 49:00 he says "you know maximum penalty in this country for perjury? 20 years ...". so I think he has stronger evidence for his claim that would cancel these allegations. I'm saying 100 percent he's satoshi but I think interesting to watch what's going on and how it unfolds.

[@MaximoLeGrand]

Navid Dadkhah I agree you Navid

[@spiritusinfinitus]

@@naviddadkhah4485 If that's the case then why does he and Jimmy need to outright lie about the Wayback Machine page that was referenced here by the member of the audience, and why do they state that it's not credible evidence that is accepted by the courts when clearly it is, as a quick search of previous court records demonstrates?

[@runabath]

If I was Satoshi Nakamoto and had a million bitcoins worth ££🤑billions and I didn’t believe in bitcoin because “the block is too small”any more I would sell my bitcoin .simple he is not Satoshi it’s my mum who won’t buy me a f#;kin bike for Christmas 🎄

[@runabath]

@Silver Crypto you mean it's too hard for Satoshi Nakamoto to sell one or 0.00000001 btc. It's not hard he invented it

[@Skinski7]

During the BCH/BSV fork I remember him openly threatening that he intended to destroy both BTC and BCH in a timely manner. Oh how the narrative changes. Craig is a very nasty and vindictive individual.

[@Skinski7]

I read it in his tweets during the fork. His threat was that he was going to crash the price of both BTC and BCH. He is a very vindictive and nasty individual.

[@antonnym563]

@@Skinski7 Just spreadig fear. So people buy into his little scam coin.

[@antonnym563]

@@runabath Privacy would be so neat now.

[@kadmon78]

Finally the truth comes out

[@vester2196]

You seriously think Craig is Satoshi? Lol

[@flagermusen]

@@vester2196 I know for a fact that he is.

[@vester2196]

@@flagermusen How do you know that? If he is he have done an incredible job giving proof he isn't. I have to give him that if that's the case. Here's a good summery of all the evidence stacked against him: bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright But if you have any new evidence, would love to see that.

[@PhilCalfee]

No way this guy is Satoshi

[@flagermusen]

@@vester2196 There's plenty of evidence, but dumb dumbs are too stupid to find it. Here, let me spoonfeed you www.reddit.com/r/CraigIsSatoshi/

[@mandarinvozhao756]

The truth is always there.

[@TechnoCoManCHE]

Anyone noticed Satoshi Nakamoto lately was really busy publishing on amazon?

[@mranderson3277]

lol

[@valentindegen]

Next level institutionalized shilling

[@hazzbooo]

"i will never be infront of a camera ever again" - Craig S. Wright the con man

[@ian.piepenbrock]

Epic rant about altered docs, court, code is law, SJWs, the decline of Western culture and the myth of equality starts around 45:00

[@nestorandAudio]

43:27 She knows who the troll is.

[@lorddizer]

Almost an hour of 101 how to not answer any questions

[@rudicassidy7369]

Observe the pattern. All negative comments come from accounts registered this week, with zero followers and zero previous comments. It's like the freaking resurrection day

[@jamrollz]

Rudi cassidy but but muh tRuTh

[@-ED-]

@@jamrollz get a life

[@turbokike7396]

you're right, your channel is pretty clean, only one video of how to draw a croquis, you basket weave by any chance ?

[@-ED-]

@@turbokike7396 you have nothing on your channel, you even hide date of when you created the channel, which to me sounds like you are a fake account, a sock puppet account, so you fit right in into his description.... which makes him correct, and you a troll.

[@marielrego8775]

-ED- Bitcoin SV Channel -> a fork of a fork of Bitcoin Cash ABC. So your true name name is Bitcoin Cash SV 🤣

[@Fregattxz]

I don't even have to watch this through to realize it is "rat poison squared". Shame on whoever shares this, because all this person wants is media coverage and attention. If we simply turn our backs and don't even mention him anymore he will just fade away.

[@tobiasmd1126]

true!

[@DegreesOfThree]

If this talk is rat poison squared, then how are you still alive?

[@SenthilKumar-qv2yn]

I fully agree about the equality Craig talked about. No doubt he is well educated and thoughtful person. And no doubt he is Satoshi too.

[@jefffoster8399]

Do you folks at Oxford know how Bitcoin works? If this ass wants to prove his claim, he can do so for about around a few pennies. Move a Satoshi from the Genesis block...that's it, that's all. He won't because he can't.

[@roatanonlinecommunity8405]

Jeff Foster I watched the entire thing waiting for this exact question and no one asked it. Wow.

[@devnstakes]

LMAO 😂. FR tho

[@MaximoLeGrand]

It’s not the time to move those pennies. The world is not prepared yet

[@mikedemike5393]

he should show his adresses to his enemies...so blockstream can have a twitter poll to determined he stole his BTC and those addresses can be blocked...and i would not be keen to be visited by cia...

[@rahulxsood]

wow... jesus.

[@jopheonholzorf]

49:30 so... the wayback machine isn't trustworthy anymore?

[@spiritusinfinitus]

Meanwhile.. Let's check some case law... "Federal Judge Says Internet Archive's Wayback Machine A Perfectly Legitimate Source Of Evidence" "The defendant tried to argue that the Internet Archive's pages weren't admissible because the Wayback Machine doesn't capture everything on the page or update every page from a website on the same date. The judge, after receiving testimony from an Internet Archive employee, disagreed. He found the site to a credible source of preserved evidence -- not just because it captures (for the most part) sites as they were on relevant dates but, more importantly, it does nothing to alter the purity of the preserved evidence." UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD., Plaintiff, v. PLATTFORM ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Case No. 14-2464-JWL Once again, Faketoshi and that other guy prove they have no idea what they're talking about.

[@DegreesOfThree]

The wayback machine may be trustworthy, but a screenshot is not. And if you don't have the original screenshot of a page, you don't know how that page was altered over time.

[@ryanxcharles]

You can tell which guy in the audience reads Twitter.

[@TC-pp7xe]

Everyone. Except the first question.

[@antoz8229]

I'm all in on BSV but how does CSW prove things in court if the courts and law don't understand bitcoin etc?

[@davemullen-muhr9788]

You're on one hahah....i love it

[@newsupdate690]

@@antoz8229 They can perfectly understand. Only the snake oil salesmen in crypto would like you to believe only THEY can understand.

[@marielrego8775]

Ryan, tell us MOAR

[@ezploraezplora6781]

i am not feeling this

[@RawLu.]

Adam Back.

[@chrismale9976]

Satoshi Nakamoto Everyone knows this.... Craig is crazy

[@photogol]

Good for CW, the audience didn’t seem very bright.

[@wstaq]

Academia is broken.

[@ariana5819]

who can mine such a big blocks?

[@kadmon78]

No Raspberry Pi

[@stanstandard5635]

CSW. He has a bias to decentralized mining.

[@mpenagar]

You can validate BSV in a Raspberry Pi, even with terabyte EMPTY blocks....

[@thrls]

First 11 minutes are a very good introduction to Bitcoin (BSV).

[@AussieSteve001]

Craig is right about central banks.

[@aidanrussell7920]

All brace! Blockstream trollstorm incoming

[@allanjunior812]

trolling requires less cognitive resources than spending 1h watching something that'll only give them unnecessary headaches

[@aidanrussell7920]

@Darren Kis :) coming from someone that still delivers leaflets (nowadays, in a digital marketing era), you're the perfect example of how much business acumen the BTC proponents have

[@aidanrussell7920]

@Darren Kis see Allan's reply above. Your cognitive capabilities are reflected by the words you use: 'u', wut' and 'high'

[@ozgeozcelik8921]

Craig Wright talked about Moral sentiments well this reference stand alone is very well other than we all listened to a boomer's rant.

[@finnholmquist7561]

özge özçelik English?

[@TechnoCoManCHE]

Doesn't the ability to stand in court depend on funds only from a timely perspective?

[@tech-by5jy]

Show me the Satoshi #Genesisblock

[@RamonQuesada]

Compilation of +440 Craig Wright´s Post, Papers & Books in chronological order. ramonquesada.com/english/compilation-craig-wright/

[@raxmouse]

Who is "paul solotoshi"

[@raxmouse]

I give 100 btc for correct answer

[@philippelhaus]

i just like cause craig is a genius, will watch this tmrw. good night

[@nftking9942]

LOL

[@nss490]

Sociopaths!

[@panzadura]

Comments be like: Blockrabbas! Blockrabbas!

[@theoracleofcrypto]

love

[@artursercins3515]

Well maybe he really is "Satoshi", but it doesn't mean he is the creator of the Bitcoin protocol. Have a feeling that is his angle for this court case. No one will believe a person that can't code is the creator of Bitcoin.

[@daehy]

he is real satoshi!!!

[@SatoshiNakamoto-mc9wk]

Any body can claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto but an extra ordinary claim requires an extraordinary evidence, I am not Craig Steven Wright, and he is me, I am Satoshi Nakamoto and my evidences are in the Genesis Block and in the timestamp, which I have embedded cryptographically.

[@Hoffmanpack]

Read a lot of satoshis old comments from back when he was posting. I think CW might have hired the real satoshi to research a project like bitcoin. That guy released it captured the priv keys of the satoshi stash and destroyed them. CW can win in court that it was his funding that created the bitcoin paper and it is his property and he is listed as the creator. Real nakamoto probably died or is being tortured indefinitely for the priv keys to the stash that he probably terminated. Who knows but CW doesn't say he wrote tons of code and worked tirelessly with others to create the algorithm. But he demands that the name of satoshi is rightly his in the eyes of the courts. In my opinion CW has difficulty putting together sentences let alone code 6k plus lines. We can only prove it with a signature from the original block that is the proof that CW avoids talking about like it doesn't matter. How could satoshi sit around and argue he is satoshi all day and not once and for all prove it with a transaction or signature. Unless he is faking it his actions do not makes sense if he were the real satoshi mastermind / creator behind bitcoin.

[@kadmon78]

Please go to court and prove what you saying. Thats simple

[@felixnuwahid9879]

People fall for it

[@annab8974]

They speak the truth - get onboard with BSV - its going to change the world, and you can say (like me) that you supported it early on. Dr Wright, to me is a great mind who has created a great thing....it’s as simple as that. I can appreciate his genius, his creation and his follow through, his fostering and care for his creation which has been bastardised until he took back control. Imagine how you would feel, if you created something and others turned into the very antithesis of what you had envisioned?

[@DylanFowler]

And that's how Satoshi feels about CW.

[@cryptogod6921]

Anna Banana get rekt

[@ffmatt1236]

BSV is a cult and Craig is a scammer, his history of fabricating evidence continues: news.bitcoin.com/craig-is-a-liar-early-adopter-proves-ownership-of-bitcoin-address-claimed-by-craig-wright/ You can see all of the correspondence for the court battle and exhibits here: www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/kleiman-v-wright/?page=1 Currently he is being compelled by the court to produce evidence since his case is on shaky grounds.

[@kingcesar4272]

Love bitcoin sv⚔️💯🏆🐺🤑😎

[@jillbetts1241]

That was excellent.

[@CokoroosMelo]

👍

[@yarger007]

And Blockchain is essentially a distributed version of a singly linked list (which was created in 1955 btw) with consensus rules and restricted size. Each block in the linked list of a blockchain consists of a tree of data. It's not that complicated, it's just a restrictive combination of rudimentary data structures in a distributed fashion with open input and a consensus algorithm. Singly linked lists evolved to arrays and up to the point of DAGs for organizing data over the course of 40 years. Saying the DAG is based on an old tech from the 90's shows the lack of understanding you have about your own technology and the history that it's based on.

[@elixexo4011]

31:02 Why even answer this? like what is even the question here? This is obviously a situation where she's trying to corner him to say something stupid and he fell for it.

[@santiagonunez6294]

49:20 craig kind of has a legit point, hes risking prison ifbhes lying and hes gotta hope satoshi doesnt sign a block publicly Quite a risk to be honest and satoshi has yet to say craig wright isnt satoshi...which is odd

[@jestronixhanderson9898]

Move a satoshi , come on do it. Yeh thought so.

[@frodobaggins7469]

He will only do that as a last resort.

[@DegreesOfThree]

The problem is once the Satoshi coins move, it will be too late to avoid the tsunami of panic selling.

[@warcloud12]

You may like or not like him, but nobody talks and understands Bitcoin more than Craig Wright.

[@youtubeuno7779]

Oxford Union, why did you erase the comment of some guy tangleblog about the iota question of 51:30 whats the problem? There is no free speech here or what? That is just making you look worst, AND CRAIG YOU ARE NOT SATOSHI.

[@JongtaeKIM]

I don't understand why some people still don't accept CSW is Satoshi. Maybe because the conflict of interest? There are already plenty of evidence out there that he is the one who understand and explain bitcoin better than anybody.

[@FXAlgoTrader]

You're having a laugh aren't you? Andreas Antonopolous would destroy Craig Wright both technically and in fundamental terms in a heartbeat. Roger Ver is far more technically able and he's not even a hardcore developer. To date there is ZERO evidence to support CSW's claim of being Satoshi. Granted... he's made 'attempts' at proving he's SN but all of these attempts have failed due to the evidence being either doctored or unsubstantiated. If he really wanted to prove it he could move some coins from an original SN wallet using private keys... of course there is the possibility that Kleiman was Satoshi and CSW alegedly may have stolen Kleiman's private keys. Hence the ongoing lawsuit. So in fact, if CSW did activate an old SN wallet address it may not actually prove he is Satoshi but may possibly implicate him as per the Kleiman vs Wright case (assuming Kleiman was Satoshi).... .. Perhaps a better test, bearing in mind Kleiman is deceased, would be to ask CSW to provide a lecture on the white paper logic and be open to a forensic examination by developers who actually know what they are talking about. I suspect CSW's 'wheels may come off' pretty quickly in such a scenario. Personally I don't think there''s much chance the person who wrote the 09 white paper is anything closely resembling Craig Wright. The language patterns and gaps in technical understanding just don't add up. You can put lipstick on a pig... but it's still a pig!

[@alexocasio-gomez5267]

The burden of proof is on you to prove that he is Satoshi and you have repeatedly failed to prove it. We don't have to prove he is not Satoshi or you have to accept that everybody who claims to be Satoshi is also Satoshi until you prove they are not.

[@MrMShake]

FX AlgoTrader 1st I don’t think he’s Satoshi, but CW has a much better technical understanding than either Andreas or Roger

[@FXAlgoTrader]

@@MrMShake based on what exactly? CSW appear to be technically weak. As you can see from some of the more educated comments on here CSW really doesn't understand Blockchain origins or DAGs.. personally I think he chucks around a few buzz words which is generally enough to convince the layman. Have you listened to Andreas' talks in detail? The guy knows his way around Bitcoin like very few others. He's a fantastic advocate for the crypto space and conducts himself professionally. On the other hand your false prophet gets notably twitchy, rude and unprofessional when questioned about his integrity. If the Kleiman case goes against Wright I think this will unravel quite quickly and BSV and the dubious backing behind it will most likely disappear. We need professionals in the space, not egomaniacs purporting to be something they are not.

[@cryptogod6921]

Dumbfuk

[@yumorules]

Mr Wright is spot on tbe money.

[@peterpyke1213]

we know whats in the bank vault........nothing

[@antonlanoe4060]

We know that peter pyke wet his pants.

[@peterpyke1213]

@@antonlanoe4060 haha,just saw this.drying out nicely thanks

[@euclideszoto997]

I hear you Craig but we are not the judge. John 12: 47,48. The car was invented. How people use cars we are not the judge. Bitcoin is the same way.

[@nick_diesel]

Move some Bitcoin from Satoshi's untouched wallet. I'll wait.

[@INeedsMoneys]

That doesnt really prove anything tho. If satoshis wallet get hacked.. does that mean the hacker is satoshi? No. Craig is obv. a fraud. But moving bitcoin is not proof

[@vester2196]

@@INeedsMoneys No it's not absolute proof, but still the best "proof" he has ever given though

[@INeedsMoneys]

@@vester2196 in my opinion. We need absolute proof. And absolute proof is impossible to get on this matter. So satoshi is forever Anonymous.

[@naviddadkhah4485]

@@vester2196 well, I think that's exactly why he's going to court so people don't say he stole the keys. after that he'll sign. That's what I think going to happen.

[@vester2196]

@@naviddadkhah4485 He first need to prove he has the keys though. We'll see the 28th i guess. If he had the keys in the first place, he would have signed them by now, instead of writing long incoherent gibberish blog posts with filled with lies and no proof at all.

[@GurinderBhangooProfile]

Awesome stuff, keep it going Craig!!!

[@GurinderBhangooProfile]

Anybody trying to learn about Craig, don't follow these comments, research him yourself. DYOR

[@mosesflood3716]

if going to Harvard or such doesn't make me worth despite who I am, then your measure of worth isn't universal or flawless and it should only concern uou or a community that consists of the same mindset

[@slamblambacid]

It's very sad that this religious-like hoax has come out of the crypto space. He even speaks like if he were a messiah. His thoughts are the very opposite of what Bitcoin stands for.

[@TheLionManOnline]

Funny they gotta go to universities where students wont stand up to them calling them out on their BS.

[@mrantihippie]

The truth ? Check Bitcoins Hashpower vs Bitcoin SV, hell compare BitcoinCash to it. Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash are beating the hell out of SV atm. Nobody seems to want to mine it.

[@DegreesOfThree]

TSLA is currently worth more than the top five car makers combined. So what? That doesn't prove anything except that people are often irrational and ignorant.