Dr. Tim Gray - Jesus as Prophet - 2018 Applied Biblical Studies Conference

Рет қаралды 10,587

Күн бұрын

Dr. Tim Gray delivered this talk, "Jesus as Prophet: The Significance of Peter as 'Bar Jonah' in Relation to Jesus' Prophetic Mission", at the 2018 Steubenville Applied Biblical Studies Conference. To learn more about the Steubenville Applied Biblical Studies Conference, visit steubenvilleco...
---------------------------------------
Connect with us at steubenvillecon...
Facebook: / steubenville
Twitter: / go2steubenville
Instagram: / go2steubenville
Pinterest: / go2steubenville
Questions or Comments about these videos?
Email us at steubenvilleengagement@gmail.com

Пікірлер: 12

@briandelaney6354 5 жыл бұрын

Thank you Dr Gray, your teachings are always mind opening

@edgardocalma105 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you Dr. Tim for God be the glory. This is the first time I heard this revelation. Thank God. Ed Calma from the Philippines.

@kimberlymartin2314 Жыл бұрын

EXTREMELY INTERESTING! 📖 Sharing.

@pictoutown 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you Dr . Gray .You are so wonderfully faith - filled. I am taking your 14 week Bible Study about Mark 's Gospel- (Forned). You are a Prophet , and I am so blessed to hear and listen to your teaching .

@mariakelly975 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you very much Dr Gray! Spelling binding talk...enjoyed it immensely! There is so much here I have to listen to it many times!

@harmur80 Жыл бұрын

Because St. Paul knew a “Puten” (2nd Timothy 4:21), two things need to be noted. This may or may not be the same “Puten” that St. Paul knew and whose name is found on a brick 2 thousand years later. Obviously, there were many “putens” in the Roman Empire. There is no way to know for sure. Secondly, to apply this to St. Peter is without historical or scriptural foundations. Thus, there is no SCRIPTURAL foundation for Peter to be the head of the Roman Church. Note, carefully that St. Peter’s name is not even mentioned among the faithful of the Church of Rome whom St. Paul identifies in Chapter 16 of his famous letter to the Church of Rome. To say that St. Paul purposely overlooked St. Peter in Romans Chapter 16 is beyond credibility. The talk seems like a soft sell on the idea that Peter was the OFFICIAL head of the early church. Dr. Gray’s use of 1 Corinthians is somewhat typical of Catholic theologians who strain out the gnat (that this passage in 1st Corinthians 3 proves that Peter was in Rome via Aquila and Pricilla), and yet swallow the camel (the whole jest of St. Paul’s argument is that Peter was not any better than any of the other Apostles). Why was the context and emphasis of 1 Corinthians, chapter 3, completely ignored? Seems to me that the FOCUS of St. Paul was overlooked because it would have put St. Peter in His rightful place. And what is St. Peter’s OFFICIAL position in the 1st century Church. All we need to do is listen to St. Peter himself , who declared and confirmed his OFFICIAL position within the Church as being that of “an Apostle,” (1 Peter 1:1; 2 Peter 1:1). Remember that St. Peter wrote these words under the inspiration and direction of the Holy Spirit, who promises to guide the Apostles into all Truth (John 16:13). None of the other Apostles ever addressed St. Peter as the Rock of the Church. In fact, every time that St. Peter uses the Greek words for rock (whether Petra or lithos), he uses it in reference to Christ Jesus (cf. Acts 4:11, 12; 1 Peter 2:6-8), and not in reference to himself. “SO LET NO ONE BOAST IN MEN. For all things are yours, whether Paul or Apollos or Cephas…” (1 Corinthians 3:21). Note that Peter is listed last in this passage, and the focus of the argument here is that the Apostles are to be viewed as equals. Likewise this is confirmed by Matthew 23:8-11.