Hey drach, what are your thoughts on the upcoming Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts video game? It might be something worthwhile to check out. Here's the link to the game's website: www.dreadnoughts.ultimateadmiral.com/
@csikidomi5 жыл бұрын
Do you know about Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnaught?would you check it out and give your opinion on the shipbuilding part of the game?
@Strongbeef_Hoofstomp5 жыл бұрын
Why do modern warships (starting with cold war and forwards) no longer use armor? Is it completly pointless or just not very cost effective?
@nicoderfeuerloscher16845 жыл бұрын
Since you made a guide to a floaty log, what about battle logs?
@huskythedinosaur15925 жыл бұрын
What is the most insane story of damage happening to a vessel and surviving it that you know about?
@Kevin_Kennelly5 жыл бұрын
Drachism of the Day: 14:24 "Instead, the two sides decided to start trolling each other in a manner that wouldn't be entirely out of place in a 21st-century internet forum. Only they were using somewhat more polite language, better spelling and, of course, the use of flags."
@TacgnolSimulacrum5 жыл бұрын
Is there a master list of these somewhere?
@jimtalbott95355 жыл бұрын
Yes! Better hand writing also, I'd assume.
@jamespfp5 жыл бұрын
RE: "the use of flags" #Hashtag
@AdamMGTF5 жыл бұрын
Got to be one of the best yet!
@Kevin_Kennelly5 жыл бұрын
@@TacgnolSimulacrum I've been appending the weekly DotD into one file. But only for the last two months. That's about a third of them. The first one can be found in the comments of Drydock Episode 039
@Ebolson10195 жыл бұрын
Can we just take a moment to appreciate Essex Jr
@titincat172 Жыл бұрын
No
@aceous99 Жыл бұрын
kawaii
@GentlemanBystander10 ай бұрын
When I heard it, it put a big smile on my face.
@Big_E_Soul_Fragment5 жыл бұрын
Damn, these new Aircraft Carrier designs look retro as hell.
@USSAnimeNCC-5 жыл бұрын
One question where are we going to land the plane
@Big_E_Soul_Fragment5 жыл бұрын
@@USSAnimeNCC- Those sails are obviously cleverly disguised jets. They land VTOL-style.
@USSAnimeNCC-5 жыл бұрын
@@Big_E_Soul_Fragment I see and we get launch out the sides Battlestar Galactica style
@sarjim43815 жыл бұрын
@@USSAnimeNCC- Ah, so it's a Q Ship style carrier then...
@bigblue69175 жыл бұрын
@@sarjim4381 The had some well trained pigeons.
@vikkimcdonough61532 жыл бұрын
18:15 - The fact that he was quite effectively tying down several British warships simply by sitting in port and doing nothing apparently not having crossed Porter's mind.
@scottmcintosh43975 жыл бұрын
There was also a whaling ship named Essex. It had the ignominy of being the only ship in history to actually be rammed & sunk by the whale it was hunting. This was the template for the S.S. Pequod in Moby Dick ⛵🐳
@sarjim43815 жыл бұрын
The best kind of naval war is one where the opponents anchor in harbor and then glare at each other. :)
@1950Chimaera5 жыл бұрын
When the French Navy took a brave stand against the Italian attack in WW 2...
@Christopher-N3 жыл бұрын
A contest of gentlemenly taunts, with accompanying diss songs of the era.
@wuffothewonderdog Жыл бұрын
Were the French involved in WW2?
@stevehomeier83685 жыл бұрын
The unhappy prospect of being laid up for a month on disability is made more tolerable by knowing that I can catch up on your entertaining and informative videos
@admiraltiberius19895 жыл бұрын
War of 1812, dont you mean American Revolution Part two, Two Ocean Boogaloo ?? Fantastic video as always Drach.
@johnshepherd86875 жыл бұрын
More like a prequil to WWI.
@KitsuneRogue5 жыл бұрын
@@johnshepherd8687 I've always held the Franco-Prussia and Brother's Wars as the prequels to WWI.
@johnshepherd86875 жыл бұрын
@@KitsuneRogue I was being obtuse. US involvement in the First World War was ultimately a "Free Trade and Sailors' Rights" sort of thing. The historic Isolationist position has always been that US can freely trade with who ever it wants despite your "little disagreement." American isolationists don't seem understand that our free trade is their trading with the enemy and always leads to conflict. Contemporary isolationists think they have broken the code and seek to wall off America from the rest of the world. In their historical ignorance they don't know the Jefferson Adminstration pursued this policy and almost destroyed the young country.
@davidtuttle75565 жыл бұрын
@@johnshepherd8687 That's because Trump can talk the talk but can't walk the walk. Hes a pussy at heart. Just like Jefferson was.
@absalomdraconis5 жыл бұрын
@@johnshepherd8687 : All sides involved understand things quite well. What the warring participants _intentionally disregard_ is that interfering with the trade of uninvolved third parties _is itself already an act of war._ I repeat: the warring parties know _and ignore_ that such interference is itself an act of war. Except, of course, that sometimes they _don't_ ignore it, instead letting it continue. At any rate, if trade with e.g. France is to be stopped for Britain's sake, then _obviously_ the only fair and reasonable thing is to stop the trade with Britain as well, since the point is to not be a participant in the war. What's that? Britain needs the cotton for their sails? Well, I guess that they'll need to end the war sooner then, since even just allowing them to buy it _in_ US ports would be allowing trade. Those "this group is wrong because X" arguments are never right, specifically because they over-simplify the reality in favor of whatever side the argument deems correct. When you try genuinely to find the "correct answer", it almost universally devolves to either "everyone hates the solution, so noone will agree to it", or "we have the most guns, so we'll force you to do it our way". There _are_ no "good", nor "correct", nor other types of "superlative" answers, just answers that you can or cannot achieve.
@Alex-cw3rz5 жыл бұрын
USS Essex journey is the inspiration for Master and Commander Far Side of the World. The ship becoming the USS Norfolk in the book and Acheron in the movie, which were bascially the same as the USS Constitution rather than a blueprint of the USS Essex.
@hernerweisenberg70525 жыл бұрын
i didnt read the book, but i think in the movie they described the Acheron as a "44gun 18pdr frigate" wich would be much closer to the essex then the connie, right? :)
@Alex-cw3rz5 жыл бұрын
@@hernerweisenberg7052 I can't remember in the Book the weight of shot, but it was a 44 gun ship built to the lines of the original 6 frigates (the 44 gun ones), unlike USS Essex. And in the movie the ship is directly modelled off the USS Constitution, I think they made it 18 pounders to make it sound more realistic a fight for the Surprise to win.
@hernerweisenberg70525 жыл бұрын
yeah i guess calling the Constitution a 44 gun ship is like calling the Bismarck a 10000 ton treaty compliant battleship ;D
@Alex-cw3rz5 жыл бұрын
@@hernerweisenberg7052 well yeah, but that was the same with almost all naval ship back then
@RCAvhstape5 жыл бұрын
@@hernerweisenberg7052 BTW, when you say "Connie" that's usually a nickname for the Constellation, not the Constitution. The more recent aircraft carrier Constellation was referred to as "Connie" by many sailors and Marines in the 80s and 90s.
@jlvfr5 жыл бұрын
RN: U GO USN: NO, U GO Chileans: /grab popcorn, sit to watch
@Reilly-Maresca5 жыл бұрын
João Rita literally culminating in a “1v1 me, bro!”
@Rammstein0963.5 жыл бұрын
Some say...they are still engaged in that immortal debate to this day...
@RCAvhstape5 жыл бұрын
It was like a South Park Bro-down.
@jlvfr5 жыл бұрын
@@RCAvhstape :D
@carlousmagus53875 жыл бұрын
Basically
@ShillienFeuer5 жыл бұрын
And here I'm, 205 years later hearing such trolling situation in Valparaíso. Very interesting video with my city included.
@matchesburn4 жыл бұрын
14:26 "My lord, I do believe the colonials are signaling very disparaging remarks upon your family line, particularly your mother's side."
@turbowolf3025 жыл бұрын
Essex and Essex Jr.: Don't sail to me or my son ever again. Or you get the hurt balls.
@Grimmwoldds5 жыл бұрын
Atlantic: I'm lost. Essex: I always wanted a son.
@thegrandnope71435 жыл бұрын
HMS Pheobe: Hippity Hoppity Yer Both Me Properties
@shanelodge3913 жыл бұрын
Hurt balls .......lol
@DeadBaron5 жыл бұрын
Gotta thank the Barbary Pirates for allowing the foundations of our Navy to be laid down. The Revolution dug the foundation, but the raiders laid the stonework. It's amazing how long we've really been fighting people from that region...
@josephdedrick93374 жыл бұрын
if the people dont speak english we fight them, and if they do, we fight them 2 or 3 times.
@HJBounell4 жыл бұрын
@@josephdedrick9337 that explains why chuck martelwas fighting an islamic army. in france. 300 years before the crusades. By all means, continue
@josephdedrick93374 жыл бұрын
@@HJBounell that was a joke dude
@thekinginyellow17443 жыл бұрын
@@HJBounell "Chuck Martel" You realize that now you are now on a French watchlist for that.
@erict78405 жыл бұрын
I was stationed on the latest version of the Essex
@CaptRye5 жыл бұрын
this sounds like the plot of "Master and Commander"
@sarjim43815 жыл бұрын
It was indeed.
@jacktattis1435 жыл бұрын
@@sarjim4381 What the ending?
@509Gman5 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure the Essex was the inspiration for the Acheron. Obviously they had to make it French or the American studios would never have been involved.
@ricky66084 жыл бұрын
thgreatandini No, the Acheron is based on the Constitution, it even looks almost exactly like it in the movie. The Surprise and the Essex would be evenly matched ships
@brianmessemer29733 жыл бұрын
@@ricky6608 Both points are correct. The Acheron's identity as a superior enemy frigate makes it analogous to the Constitution, yet its mission and purpose in the Pacific (to endanger the British whaling fleet) made it analogous to the Essex. Peter Wier and the writers of the film cherry picked plot threads (and indeed much of the dialogue) from many of the Aubrey-Maturin books, made alterations to suit their purposes, and wove them into the screenplay which serves as a smorgasbord or medley of the novels. To be fair to the film makers, it's impossible to properly distill one full novel into a mere 2 hour film, let alone 20.
@TheNinjaDC5 жыл бұрын
Damn, now I wish the USN would christen another USS Essex Jr. Just imagine a FFG(X) USS Essex Jr paired with a new Ford Class USS Essex.
@Mree175 жыл бұрын
TheNinjaDC currently there is a USS Essex (LHD-2) a Wasp-class Landing Helicopter Dock in service so I don’t think there will be a Ford Class Essex anytime soon.
@Betrix50605 жыл бұрын
@@Mree17 Ford class Essex Sr. to the Wasp class Essex Jr. Problem solved.
@ronclark97245 жыл бұрын
@@Betrix5060 America has far too many more names to use than have a second Essex...
@Betrix50605 жыл бұрын
@@ronclark9724 Nah man. We need an Essex Jr. IT HAS TO HAPPEN!
@ronclark97245 жыл бұрын
@@Betrix5060 I can't think of a reason why... There will only be one USS Essex in commission...
@LostShipMate5 жыл бұрын
I thought you were referring to the Carrier for a couple of seconds. I was very confused, and now sad that it wasn't a giant carrier hunting down whalers.
@kyle189345 жыл бұрын
Lol an aircraft carrier and escort fleet hunting down petty crime and territorial fishing infringements... could you imagine getting stopped by an aircraft carrier and fighter planes for sailing to close to usa waters lol
@tieck44084 жыл бұрын
I thought he meant the only ship ever intentionally sunk by a whale.
@LostShipMate4 жыл бұрын
@@tieck4408 Call me Ismail . . .
@ashipnerdoffical42604 жыл бұрын
You know, that sounds like a fantastic dimensions novel or a brainless action thriller.
@umbrellashotgunman3 жыл бұрын
“I knew those Japanese were still up to no good!” - The ghost of Essex, probably.
@mattf4u-4965 жыл бұрын
Well of course a 30K ton aircraft carrier would be the bane- Oh wait wrong Essex.
@hisdadjames4876 Жыл бұрын
Now that’s what I call a ‘classy’ comment😐
@hectorheathcote94955 жыл бұрын
My Great Uncle, George Dunning served aboard a later version of USS Essex(1876) during the Spanish American War in 1898. I have a photo of him standing on the deck of the ship with "USS Essex" on his navy cap. Great video, Drach. Could you do one on the later 1876 version? Would love to see and hear about her adventures during the war. Thanks!
@Nyx_2142 Жыл бұрын
I'm curious, do you just find the flag in your profile pic interesting for some odd reason or are you actually a dipshit 3%er terrorist? Because you would be a terrorist. It's a far-right neo-nazi militia that was classified as a terrorist organization after they participated in the Jan 6th insurrection.
@christopherconard28315 жыл бұрын
Now I have the urge to troll with semaphore. 🎌
@simoneriksson83295 жыл бұрын
I would be intrested in a video were you talk about the conflict between the US and the barbarystates in more detail :)
@mikebrown37725 жыл бұрын
Yes, I was about to make a similar comment when I saw this post. Or a video about the Philadelphia.
@AlisonFort5 жыл бұрын
Great guide - demonstrating that reality is even more entertaining than the movies!
@LetsTalkAboutPrepping3 жыл бұрын
"Congress lost its head and went off course....also, a storm dismantled the frigate and it had to return to port" 😂😂pure gold
@axelandersson63145 жыл бұрын
From now on I would like to be addressed as Axel "The bane of Whalers" Andersson.
@bificommander5 жыл бұрын
Join Greenpeace, go to Japan, board a couple of whalers, then we'll talk. :p
@disbeafakename1673 жыл бұрын
I would like to be "Disbea 'bane of green peace' Fakename" and sail my frigate about the Pacific.
@zacharyzier3145 жыл бұрын
I’m a simple man, I see a Drach upload, I watch and thoroughly enjoy, sleep be damned.
@john88benson5 жыл бұрын
Aesthetically this is one of my favorite yankee frigates. Thanks for the review.
@sarjim43815 жыл бұрын
I agree, Essex (1) was a very pleasant looking ship. Hanging banners all over it taunting the RN didn't hurt any.
@viridisxiv7665 жыл бұрын
i love stories from the age of sail, nations seemed to steal as many ships as they built!
@disbeafakename1673 жыл бұрын
Yes, as they say, the French build the best ships, just ask their British crews.
@1TruNub5 жыл бұрын
DAMN THE TORPEDOS, FULL STEAM AHEAD
@demizer19685 жыл бұрын
When he mentioned that all I could think of was "Damn, he was an old fart when he sailed into Mobile."
@Alex-cw3rz5 жыл бұрын
A great video would be on the Chesapeake vs HMS Shannon, the inovations introduced by the captain of the Shannon is such a fascinating read and really showed to be incredibly effective in the battle.
@99IronDuke5 жыл бұрын
Yes that would make a very good video,
@g1stylempdesign9293 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! Thank you for all the amazing facts and narrative
@wjsnow21954 жыл бұрын
Great video, sadly a much forgotten time period in our naval history so thank you for taking the time to research and produce this.
@spookyshadowhawk67765 жыл бұрын
Nothing like a severe trolling to weaken the resolve of your enemy!
@redshirt51265 жыл бұрын
Sociological warfare is best warfare!
@matthewrobinson43235 жыл бұрын
1) Excellent video, as always, despite your continued hysterectomies of the ships by referring to them as"it". Grrrrrr. 2) Patrick O'brian had this in one of the books in his Aubrey-Maturin series, Desolation Island. 3) I was unaware that Facebook existed in 1814.
@AdamMGTF5 жыл бұрын
1) not sure that's wrong. After all, not all cultures call a ship "she". Given KZbin is a multi-national platform. Perhaps calling an inanimate object "it", is actually correct. ;)
@matthewrobinson43235 жыл бұрын
@@AdamMGTF Nope. The videos are made by an Englishman. This video is about American and British ships. They are "she'.
@absalomdraconis5 жыл бұрын
@@matthewrobinson4323 : And made in English to boot. Isn't relevant if some culture genders ships as "fish" or "whale" or "tree"... or "it", this is in the English language, with ships that would be using the English norms, so unless the ship's captain or someone of similar ilk tries to have it refered to differently, the ship is a "she".
@AdamMGTF5 жыл бұрын
I'll just have to agree to disagree. I couldn't care less what Drach' chooses to call them, it's his video
@matthewrobinson43235 жыл бұрын
@@AdamMGTF No, not really. Disagreeing and agreeing are purely optional. You CAN also agree to agree just as easily. 🤣
@1894db5 жыл бұрын
Part of this ship's career sounds like it was inspiration for Master and Commander.
@dr.pjuskebusk25015 жыл бұрын
1894db it was
@jacktattis1435 жыл бұрын
1894 : For heavens sake the R/N had plenty of Frigates to choose from 10 Whalers is hardly a classic fight for a Frigate
@1894db5 жыл бұрын
@@jacktattis143 I meant the Essex's exploits sounds like the enemy ship's in M & C.
@jacktattis1435 жыл бұрын
@@1894db Could be and seeing as it is a USN thing I fail to see why they did not base it on the Constitution She was the USN most successful ship. The best the Essex did was the 18 gun HMS Alert
@1894db5 жыл бұрын
@@jacktattis143 The Essex's exploits suited the story the author wanted to tell.
@johndigiovanni6223 жыл бұрын
I thought I was going hear your take on the Moby Dick story, but instead I learned something I didn't know . Thank you for the time and effort you put into your video.
@Georgieastra5 жыл бұрын
A terrific series of videos. If you're open to suggestions perhaps you could do a piece on the customs and practice of prize money in the age of sail. Particularly in this case I would really like to know how much the crew of the Essex was expecting to get from ship full of silver they captured. Of course the British crew who recaptured the vessel should also got a heap of money but since the ship had originally seemed to be owned by the bankers/ government I strongly suspect that they were shafted out of their reward.
@blaircolquhoun77803 жыл бұрын
The USS Essex was the inspiration, along with the Constitution's escape from the Guerrierre in July 1812, was the inspiration for Patirck O'Brian's The Far Side of the World.
@skipper41265 жыл бұрын
Troll Flags.. so that's how civil trolling is done. Neat.
@charlessaint79265 жыл бұрын
"We used trolling with the clever use of flags!"~Eddie Izzard (Probably)
@hazchemel5 жыл бұрын
thanks for the show. The sailing ships' careers are interesting, from the perspective of today. Venture a question? Possibly outside show's area......but anyway. What was involved in the braking up of a wooden sailing navy ship? It must have been commercially viable.
@Drachinifel5 жыл бұрын
Partially it was to retrieve copper, brass and iron fittings, and also the better condition timbers for reuse.
@bullettube98635 жыл бұрын
Great video! I was always amused reading stories about 18th century naval warfare. Polite, savage, humorous, or deadly, but always interesting. Different times. The one thing that always has prime place in these stories is the weather, particularly the wind and what quarter it was blowing over. It's really amazing, but wind powered sailing ships really were at the mercy of the wind. And battles were won or lost, and thus wars, because of the weather.
@Thirdbase95 жыл бұрын
Decatur has a long "A" as the middle syllable.
@jamespfp5 жыл бұрын
De-KAY-tur you mean?
@Rammstein0963.5 жыл бұрын
Indeed it is. And Illinois is usually pronounced by Americans as "ill-in-oy/oyz"
@madmandu5 жыл бұрын
@@Rammstein0963. The correct pronunciation is Ill-ih-noy, NEVER ill-ih-noise.
@Rammstein0963.5 жыл бұрын
@@madmandu I know that, sadly I've heard people call it both and even the occasional "Illin-wah"...fml
@ShadrachVS15 жыл бұрын
@@madmandu not to me, I add a lisping ess on the end of an otherwise proper pronunciation just to mess with people from that state... I also have a habit of pronouncing Kansas as the tribal name.
@ottomeyer69284 жыл бұрын
a very beautiful ship
@nitehawk865 жыл бұрын
Not to be confused with the USS Essess, from Hot Shots.
@adamburgess46183 жыл бұрын
Essex and Syren are two of my favorite sailing ships of their time. Yet both pretty much wind up in similar situations.
@MililaniJag Жыл бұрын
Capt. Porter should have refused to sail with only Short-Range Carronade!!Great vid! Cheers
@andrewreinbach71452 жыл бұрын
Excellent and accurate relating of the story.
@shannonman25 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this, been asking for ages.
@sanitarycockroach90385 жыл бұрын
The OG shotgun build.
@jamespfp5 жыл бұрын
9:20 -- By way of an aside -- this is one of the topics which most interest me, historically, for the period between the 17th century to the 20th, ie. Prize Rules and Admiralty Law.
@jamespfp5 жыл бұрын
^^ Consequently -- Pirate Articles, Letters of Marque, et cetera.
@skyden241953 жыл бұрын
"The coastal defenses were mostly decorative." -yeah, tell that to Fort McHenry.
@MatthewJBrown5 жыл бұрын
I'm really enjoying these age of sail videos!
@rbnhd19765 жыл бұрын
Hey just found for channel a few days ago, great work! I think an interesting video showing Victory or another first rate, ship stores and lading, in other words, how many barrels of rum, beef, cannon balls, gunpowder, etc. I saw a bill for a ship once, can't find it again, it had like a crazy amount of stuff on it, thanks!
@stephenryan19884 жыл бұрын
Good book on this subject, Mad for Glory by Richard Booth. He is from Marblehead which borders Salem, MA in Essex County
@GrouchierBear5 жыл бұрын
The stuff I read about the Essex long ago was that the ship had originally been armed with twelve pounder long guns, with the change to carronades being the work of Porter's predecessor as captain (which also rendered the ship overweight and sluggish). According to that, Porter requested they change back to long guns before the war, but was refused on the grounds that the change was too expensive (he was offered a few eighteen pounder long guns to supplement the battery, but refused). So there's an "I told you so" level of validity to his complaint, but I'm suspicious if the long guns would have substantially changed the outcome. Even if the lighter weight would have made the ship faster to escape under normal circumstances, she'd still end up partly dismasted and outgunned. He'd still be picking a fight he was ill suited to win.
@gracesprocket73405 жыл бұрын
A 12lb gun weighs ~30cwt iron on deck (plus carriage), with powder and shot of typical quantity ~ stored below the waterline - taking the overall ordnance weight to around 44cwt. Majority on deck. The 32lb carronade weighs ~17cwt iron on deck (plus slide), with powder and shot of typical quantity ~ again stored below the waterline taking the overall ordnance weight to around 48cwt. Majority in shot lockers in hold. This is slightly heavier, but not by enough to 'swamp' the hull. Excess supplies to sustain multi-month patrol, plus 'loot' from her prizes might well do so however.
@GrouchierBear5 жыл бұрын
@@gracesprocket7340 neat info, though I think part of the problem was that the Essex not only had slightly heavier guns than she was originally built with, but also carried more of them than she was supposed to. Still though, I doubt it would have changed the outcome of the fight.
@zspud215 жыл бұрын
Another brilliant video. I love the history and how it's all framed
@petroleumalley3 жыл бұрын
Whalers? OK, next in your recommended will be "Wellerman" 😎
@woolybuck68525 жыл бұрын
Beautiful wood! Love the lightning strike scared slabs. As a woodworker I'd love to have some of that in my workshop. Cheers....
@rvail1365 жыл бұрын
Briliant as always, thanks for doing this.
@s.31.l505 жыл бұрын
There are some really interesting parallels between USS Essex and KMS Admiral Graf Spee.
@spartanofrome59455 жыл бұрын
Anyone else kinda interested in seeing Drachinifel play Rule the Waves 2 and see what kind of ships he makes?
@beachboy05053 жыл бұрын
Captain of the Graf Spee should watched your video.
@gumimalac4 жыл бұрын
HAH! " soon after leaving port congress lost its head and went wildly off coarse..... also the frigate was dismasted and had to return to port." Thanks for making fun of politics while expressing no real bias or opinion on the matter. the internet need more people like you.
@Shadow-sq2yj4 жыл бұрын
Timestamp?
@NathanDudani3 жыл бұрын
@@Shadow-sq2yj 2:53ish
@tagofox46033 жыл бұрын
Great video as always. We must bring back the lost art of flag trolling.
@matthmaroo19845 жыл бұрын
I love your videos! They are all super entertaining!
@masterskrain26303 жыл бұрын
"Congress lost it's head, and went wildly off course." And NOTHING has changed since!!
@AudieHolland5 жыл бұрын
British Midshipman: Seaman first class Harper, prepare trolling flag! Seaman Harper: Trolling flag ready Sir! Midshipman: Commence painting of message, as I dictate: Seaman Harper: Very well, Sir! British crew and Captain: That should teach them LOL LOL
@dayofmone5 жыл бұрын
Strange, an Aircraft Carrier with sails. How did they do that?
@christopherconard28315 жыл бұрын
@ur mom Excellent planning. Keep the planes in kit form until needed. Space saving at it's best.
@EdMcF15 жыл бұрын
It's the third new British carrier. Eco-friendly wind power, and stealthy, even with eyeballs it's impossible to believe it's going to attack.
@mpetersen65 жыл бұрын
All that rigging actually functions as the arrestor gear
@Niklas.K955 жыл бұрын
3:20 muslim pirates breaking the agreement despite payment. They just not honored any agreement with non muslims. Sparked the first translation of the quran/koran in the US, enlargement of the navi and the origin of the phrase: "We don't negotiate with terrorists." Read it some time ago. Could be wrong about it.
@baronvonjo19295 жыл бұрын
Islam is a religion of peace though! REEEE
@Niklas.K955 жыл бұрын
@@baronvonjo1929That's new to me
@demizer19685 жыл бұрын
@@Niklas.K95 That is where the term evolved from. When obama was making such a big deal about Islam being such an "important positive influence on American history" he conveniently forgot that our first experience with islam as a nation was the barbary pirates holding Americans hostage.
@MaxwellAerialPhotography3 жыл бұрын
**Scholarly Teddy Roosevelt noises intensify**
@aebirkbeck26935 жыл бұрын
When I saw the title I instantly thought "why is Drachinifel doing a talk on Moby Dick" then realised some had HMS and others USS in front of their names :>)
@lukeclayton-holland1564 Жыл бұрын
I love this guy
@kendramalm88115 жыл бұрын
G' morning, Drach!
@rcwagon3 жыл бұрын
Another delightful guide. Though the "more" than "less" on 5 minutes was heavily reinforced, the guide was so good, I hardly noticed. I must add that the music and video opening of these guides is awesome. The combination really hits home! It deserved comment before from the first one I watched, but alas, did not come to fruition. By the way, what is the opening music? I have not been able to identify it.
@mccoyfleming66642 ай бұрын
SE-ring-GA-patum, from the original Sriringapatnam (iirc) love your content!!
@vger41562 жыл бұрын
They were using the King's English to troll one another! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@densealloy5 жыл бұрын
Any chance for a video on the USCGC Eagle?
@Uhlan_4 жыл бұрын
USS wasn't officially used until 1907. Essex would have been, and was in contemporary references, a United States FRIGATE, or USF Essex. Ships were referred to by their rate, which drove Teddy Roosevelt nuts when he was Secretary of the Navy, having to read "first class armored cruiser this" and "second class sloop of war that" so when he was president he issued executive order 549 to put a stop to it. Since THEN all US Navy vessels IN COMMISSION are prefixed with USS.
@MakeMeThinkAgain5 жыл бұрын
This was splendid, but I have one complaint. If you are going to refer to a "Porter" in the early days of the USN you have to specify which one. Still hoping for more about the campaign against the Barbary pirates. Think of all the hits you will get if pirates are in the description. And it's great history.
@hellhound47bravo35 жыл бұрын
Well, apparently you DIDN'T forget about the "Essex". Another fine video.
@geraintthatcher30765 жыл бұрын
Any chance of doing the Pelican v Argus duel in the future ?
@warrenlehmkuhleii84725 жыл бұрын
How many videos on the Essex class do we need? Oh wait.
@josiahricafrente5855 жыл бұрын
Warren Lehmkuhle yes
@jamesl63655 жыл бұрын
The number of videos shall be as numerous as 20 & 40mm mounts!
@jefferyindorf6995 жыл бұрын
well, one for each Essex, so about four more I guess.
@AngloFrancoDane Жыл бұрын
Speaking of the bane of whalers, have you done an episode on the CSS Shenandoah?
@jacktattis Жыл бұрын
Yes someone has done one.
@manuelaigner51265 жыл бұрын
Great video I love the Age of sail content keep doing more pls
@trxnme20825 жыл бұрын
Sounds like an early version of the river plate, British numerical superiority and trolling triumphing over "commerce raiders".
@jacktattis1435 жыл бұрын
TRXnMe: Yes exactly my thoughts
@craigkoehler43635 жыл бұрын
To the shores of Tripoli!
@JonatasAdoM2 жыл бұрын
The equivalent of a parking lot showdown in the sea.
@happyhighway1065 жыл бұрын
#272 Thank You for the History!
@gracesprocket73405 жыл бұрын
The other example of range and carronade's poor showing has more validity. The loss of the RN squadron in lake Eire, was at least in part due to the ability of the USN gunboats to fire on the RN flotilla as it attempted to fight and then to retreat... however here, the exchange was between 32lb long guns of 56cwt and 9'6" and the RN's 24lb and 18lb carronades, and with light airs preventing the escape of the defeated fleet from the engagement range.
@stevevalley78355 жыл бұрын
iirc, Philadelphia and Essex were both built in repose to the government's request for privately funded frigates. Were their any other ships of that period that were built privately and donated to the USN?
@peterm44752 жыл бұрын
Hillyar was knighted and became an admiral. He died in 1843. Both his sons also became admirals in the Victorian navy.
@josynaemikohler65725 жыл бұрын
I don't know, how claiming, that taking your stuff is unfair, after defeating you, does help the defense, why you lost the battle...
@gracesprocket73405 жыл бұрын
Carronades are not appreciably shorter range. A 24lb gun of moderate 8'6" length /48cwt (less than that of the Constitution, but typical of the other 24lb frigates), fired to 2213 yds at maximum carriage elevation. The Carronade of 32lb (17.1 cwt) fired to 1930 yds when fired at maximum elevation. Further the line of metal range of both guns and carronades was set by design (of the Muzzle swell and Breech ring diameter) to be approximately 700 yds for all calibres. (Different ordnance has different taper which accomplished this for their standard powder charges and shot weights, even as resistance and muzzle velocity varied with the individual calibres, length and windage variations. In actuality, far from 'not reaching' carronades, prior to the commonplace use of sights with adjustable apertures, had a distinct tendency to shoot high between their line of point blank (levelled ordnance, to the range at which the shot falls below it's platform height, by strict definition - but often tortured into 'by the time it fell to the water' in practice, which distorts the behaviour of guns (mounted in the battery) and carronades (mounted on the quarterdeck and fo'csle in most cases), and that of what the French referred to as "Pointe en Blanc", and the British as 'Line of Metal', where the sight line along the upper face of the ordnance crossed the descending branch of the shot path at longer range (the above mentioned ~700yds). All ordnance suffers from this tendency, but the higher velocity guns have a lower apex at 'line of metal' pointing, and a longer range over which levelled guns 'reach'. The myth of 'inadequate range' to fight is false, Essex found herself disabled by overconfidence, unsupported by a hostile Valpariso governor, after weeks of poor and ungentlemanly behaviour of the US squadron's commander, and outside of the neutral port. She then had her springs on her anchor shot away and fell off the wind leaving her exposed to fire from her quarter and unable to bring her broadside to bear. Both Phoebe and Cherub took fire from 32lb carronades during the engagement, and Cherub replied with her own 32lb and 18lb carronades. Her defeat was a result of mismanagement, misadventure and poor seamanship (which led to her crippling by carrying too great a press of sail), not the result of her ordnance. Also, allowing both RN vessels to engage the Essex, allowed both Essex and Essex Jr to be taken. Had they operated together in squadron, the RN vessels would have had less freedom of action, which may or may not have accomplished much... I find the performance of Essex and her captain to be inadequate in all except fortitude under fire. I certainly don't find his excuses to be very convincing.
@dredlord475 жыл бұрын
>5 minute guide to warships >25 minutes long I mean, okay. At least it's still a multiple.
@Katara199715 жыл бұрын
You forget its more ore less 5 min. but it's always more ;)
@disbeafakename1673 жыл бұрын
The more or less part allows for a little wiggle room. Like the 5+ hour drydocks.
@user-dg9pu4pe9d Жыл бұрын
I misread the title and it was the Exeter which was a most unfortunate whaler.
@finlayfraser99525 жыл бұрын
How about the SMS Emden? A true Boys Own adventure!
@roscoewhite37934 жыл бұрын
A double episode of SMS Emden and SMS Wolf; the two most successful surface raiders of the Great War.
@craighagenbruch38005 жыл бұрын
who doesn't like a good bit of trolling
@GrahamCStrouse5 жыл бұрын
Craig HAGENBRUCH Norwegians aren’t overly fond of trolls...
@vedantateacher90805 жыл бұрын
What exactly is a subscription to fund the construction of a ship?