What if one of the Taffy 3 destroyers sunk the Yamato?
@dreisparren_3 жыл бұрын
What if the germans got the Battlecruiser right from the beginning, so they never build Blücher and Build Von der Tann in 1907. Would this mean that all Derfflingers are Finished Pre- War. If so how would doggerbank and Jutland have gone with thr extra Battlecruisers ?
@Taistelukalkkuna3 жыл бұрын
Finnish Dreadnoughts Väinämöinen and Ilmarinen. Maybe some day in the future?
@dustincarlson70103 жыл бұрын
If Tirpitz had not been destroyed by air attack and somehow survived the war, could there have been a future for her as a war prize? Could she have made a decent postwar vessel in a NATO fleet, perhaps a missile conversion given her size?
@untruelie26403 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: The "Schleswig-Holstein" was not just the last german Pre-Dreadnaught to be build, but also the last german battleship in operation. She was sunk as a block ship in 1945 and later refloated by the Soviets who used her as a stationary target ship until 1966.
@ThomasPaineintheArse3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting tidbit
@Szopen7153 жыл бұрын
Also, she was the first battleship (or a warship in general) to fire guns during WWII, on 1 IX 1939, at 4:48 in the morning, shelling positions on Westrplatte
@untruelie26403 жыл бұрын
@@Szopen715 True, and she took part in the Battle of Jutland as well. She also served as the flagship of the german navy between 1926 and 1936.
@F40PH-2CAT3 жыл бұрын
If you count battlecruisers, SMS Goeben deserves that honor, not being scrapped until 1973.
@jimtaylor2943 жыл бұрын
Was the last Pre-Dreadnought to be sunk too, as she was put on the bottom in shallow water at least once.
@ThePuschkin19863 жыл бұрын
fun fact: to finance the new fleet Germany introduced among other things a tax on sparkling wine, which somehow was kept in place throughout the generations and still exists to this day, we are still paying for the Kaiser's battleships!
@535phobos3 жыл бұрын
And still we couldnt keep Goeben...
@molybdaen113 жыл бұрын
One tax more or less, no big deal. Let us pay for ships which does not exist anymore, cause why not?
@comentedonakeyboard3 жыл бұрын
If we legalise and tax Weed, we might be able to finance a few new ones 😂
@535phobos3 жыл бұрын
@@comentedonakeyboard I dont want new ones. They are ugly. I want the old ones back
@-TALLINN3 жыл бұрын
@@535phobos yeah, the new ships dont look the best tbh
@michimatsch58623 жыл бұрын
Drach casually ripping out everyone's heart at the end of the video.
@cosminetron3 жыл бұрын
No it surely has to be the ninjas cutting onions
@Luredreier3 жыл бұрын
Yep, it's really sad. :-/
@sethlaporte71403 жыл бұрын
He didn't have to hit me in the heart like that
@empath693 жыл бұрын
A sailor is a sailor is a sailor - we are all brothers and comrades-in-arms, forever allied against our one true enemy: the Sea herself. We may be called on to fight against each other, but when the battle is decided and guns silenced, the nets and boats go out and we rescue our brethren from the Sea's remorseless grip.
@Deridus3 жыл бұрын
You say he was tearing hearts out. I saluted those glorious men, all. I am proud of all those who set sail, and whilst things may be tense from time to time, their great-grand children have kept the spirit alive. Long live the Fleet!
@pedenharley62663 жыл бұрын
I have never wanted to see a Musical about the Anglo-German naval arms race… until now. Admiral Fisher and the Kaiser singing “Anything You Can Do, I can do Better” would be amusing.
@kohinarec65803 жыл бұрын
We need this! Alles du machst, mache ich besser, Die Männer, die Schiffen, Kanonen und Kesseln
@seanm25113 жыл бұрын
Im glad somebody thinks Drachinifel is funny.
@trauko13883 жыл бұрын
Yeah, their fireworks were so much better!!!
@mellon42513 жыл бұрын
Admiral Tirpitz's Beard would be truly worthy of a musical villan
@allangibson24082 жыл бұрын
I think Gilbert and Sullivan already touched on this… (HMS Pinafore…)
@Jon.A.Scholt3 жыл бұрын
The pace of technology starting in the industrial revolution was really quite staggering. Imagine a civil war vet who fought while in his early 20s or late teens; maybe even served on a sailing frigate or a river ironclad monitor. By by his early 70s there were Dreadnaughts with turbine engines that used extreme advances in metallurgy for the blades. Now the largest warships are flying at 23, 24, 25 knots and are many times larger than the largest ship of your youth. I know you could pick any technology over that period and be amazed at it's progress or even invention. But as this is about Dreadnaughts I can't help but marvel at the progression of warships, and ships in general. Cheers to all while I down another measure of my Rum Ration! I really want to say "Yar!!!" now.
@BHuang923 жыл бұрын
Some of them that grew up in the late 19th century and lived to their 100s saw cars, electricity, planes, two world wars, nuclear energy and first man to the moon!
@davidwright71933 жыл бұрын
My grandfather was born before the first powered flight, man had landed on the moon and transoceanic passenger liners were history before he turned 70.
@bigblue69173 жыл бұрын
Sometimes if you stop and think you catch yourself thinking that a young person could have been watching two men at Kitty Hawk and live long enough to watch two men at Tranquility Base. As far as technology goes that is one giant leap for mankind. Another thought for you. The Battle of Trafalgar, one of the greatest battles of the age of sail, took place after the first steam powered boat had sailed on a canal in Scotland. In fact there was a proposal to use steam powered ships to tow fireships to attack the Franco-Spanish fleet before Nelson's action. Which, if successful, could have resulted in the Battle of Trafalgar never having taken place.
@4everscifi3 жыл бұрын
Nothing motivates men to improve like the need to off their neighbor as quickly and efficiently as possible, sadly.
@BlueGrimgrin3 жыл бұрын
The example that gets me is this: The USS Constellation was the last sail-only warship of the US navy. It was launched 1854. The USS Nautilus, the first nuclear powered ship, was launched 1955. 101 years between sails and nuclear power. Honestly it makes a lot of 50's/60's sci fi make sense. "Well in the last hundred years we've gone from sailing ships to nuclear powered ships, we'll totally have a moon base by 2001."
@tobiasGR3Y3 жыл бұрын
"Three cheers for the Royal Navy!" "Three cheers for the German Navy!" *Statements like these make war a tragic affair, especially in hindsight.* 😞
@skeletonwguitar43833 жыл бұрын
On an emotional level, Ive always hated WW1 But now I despise it... Its just so sad
@virgil68733 жыл бұрын
@@skeletonwguitar4383 A pointless loss of life for an entire generation of young man.
@Gotterdammerung053 жыл бұрын
@@virgil6873 I've never understood this mentality. Those men did not consider it pointless. They joined and served with honor and pride, and the same generation fought or otherwise supported WW2. Don't demean their sacrifices for King, God, Country, Honour or Unit that they considered worth dying for by calling it pointless and treating them as foolish children who knew no better. If anything the real tragedy is a generation of people who hold so little of value except their own lives that sacrifice on that scale is entirely beyond their understanding.
@Physwe3 жыл бұрын
@@Gotterdammerung05 What a silly mentality! No, it was a completely pointless waste of men and material, and glorifying it is little more than a sick mockery.
@Gotterdammerung053 жыл бұрын
@@Physwe he says not knowing a single thing worth selling his own life for. There are many men from that generation who did not consider it a waste. C.S Lewis fought in the trenches and lost his best friend there, he did not spend his latter days crying and bitching. Instead he routinely spoke against pacifism. Take up our quarrel with the foe: To you from failing hands we throw The torch; be yours to hold it high. If ye break faith with us who die We shall not sleep, You are not those men, yet you presume to pass judgement on what they held value to. What arrogance. You want to talk about mockery? How about spending 364 days a year lambasting those men for being evil, racist, homophobic imperialist monsters who ruined our world for their warmongering greed, and then spending 1 day a year standing around "honoring their sacrifices" by spitting on their sacrifice and calling them foolish children who died "pointlessly". That's a mockery. Those men died willingly for their kings, empires, nations and to call it pointless is to mock them.
@danieltaylor52313 жыл бұрын
"Congress was doling out dollars to the US Navy like an anti-social miser stuck in an orphanage" I laughed so hard I almost pulled a muscle! Brilliant!
@jroch413 жыл бұрын
Yes 👍 LMAO 😂
@nathanlentner31293 жыл бұрын
This American very much approves of this description.
@rebelsqurl89593 жыл бұрын
So does this American. A classic Drachism to always remember! 😂
@dantreadwell74213 жыл бұрын
Have another American agreement
@OsborneCox.69.4202 жыл бұрын
yeah, that line was subtle but brilliantly hilarious.
@Harry-hu7fq3 жыл бұрын
The end of this video gave me chills at how genuinely tragic the start of the war was
@jamesbugbee68123 жыл бұрын
WWI was the founding tragedy of our 'modern' era.
@himaro1013 жыл бұрын
@@jamesbugbee6812 I would disagree with that statement. WWI signalled the beginning of the end of an era, but WW2 was the founding tragedy in my opinion. Or, more specifically, the Manhattan Project coming to fruition. WW2 marked the ending of the colonial era starting and the beginning of the atomic era.
@jonnyj.3 жыл бұрын
@@himaro101 The atomic era prevented any world wars from ever happening again, and they certainly wont happen in the next 100 years. Of course, vietnam like stuff is bound to happen, but NOTHING on the scale of ww1/2. Thank nukes for not ending the world...
@jamesbugbee68123 жыл бұрын
@@himaro101 Oh yeah; WWI was only a European suicide, other colonialists had to wait for the message to be rubbed in by WW2. And colonialism still flourishes, but under false colors.
@sergeipohkerova72113 жыл бұрын
I like these videos for their historical education, but also for the severely underrated dry humor sprinkled throughout. The little knocks on Churchill's grandstanding 😂
@the_undead3 жыл бұрын
The best part about the humor in his videos is that the vast majority of it is completely historically accurate, most of the stuff said about Winston is not even stuff with Jack came up with those are actual words said by people at the time. (Also to be fair Churchill did deserve it)
@Jon.A.Scholt3 жыл бұрын
Rum Ration this early in the morning? Yes please! Of all of Drach's "series" Rum Ration may just be my favorite.
@buck45osu3 жыл бұрын
He seems to have the most fun with it
@commandershepard42353 жыл бұрын
Rum and coffee this morning? Yes please
@dougfoust1173 жыл бұрын
They usually hit just after 7 eastern. Back when I was doing construction the alert from youtube was my second alarm lol
@mr.gunzaku4373 жыл бұрын
Hipper sings his lament "It Should Have Been Me!"
@RC-bm9so Жыл бұрын
The way you ended the episode is perfect. It shows the same humanity, emotions, and the will for friendship regardless of politics as the Christmas Truce. It is hard to understand from our modern perspective, that these young and old men, so cordial and friendly with each other, would turn against one another, ragged on by the public and the politicians within two months. That singular gunshot in the streets of Sarajevo caused these competing nations, whose leaders were not only respected their opposing colleagues, the young men who served in the armies and navies, and the royal families that saw their relationship to Queen Victoria, (in a belief it would keep them from war), become entrenched in the ideas of war and hate. That story at the end of this video is a good way to describe the Great War, friends turned foes, neighbors turned traitors, servicemen of other nations turned into demons and monsters, all because of politics...the issues weren't personal...the politics tore these relationships between the competing British and Germans apart. An excellent episode as always Drachinifel.
@knowshistory87403 жыл бұрын
The financial aspect of the race is interesting too. Britain raised the tax on income to pay for the new fleet, while the Reichstag refused to give the Kaiser such direct taxes. Instead the introduced in 1902 a tax on sparkling wine and certain other alcoholic brewages, called "Schaumweinsteuer". We still pay that tax today, but have no navy to match the amount of money.
@gavinmclaren94163 жыл бұрын
There was even more to it on the British side. Lloyd George, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, was gleeful to use the landed conservative support for naval expansion as a reason to increase taxes, such as death duties, that would particularly affect the same landed gentry that bitterly opposed his tax increases and social spending. Eventually it was a contributing factor in the House of Lords losing it's veto power over House of Commons bills. The landed gentry, which he nominally called "the Dukes", fought him so bitterly that Lloyd George compared them to the dreadnought ships themselves, stating something like "A fully loaded Duke fights as hard as a dreadnought, but costs twice as much!".
@mahbriggs3 жыл бұрын
Kind of amazing that "temporary" taxes never go away!
@gokbay30573 жыл бұрын
@@mahbriggs "Temporary" government measures are some of the most permanent things in the world.
@Bartonovich523 жыл бұрын
Yes but what few people realize is what they get instead. I’m sure that in Germany that tax functions like a sin tax in other nations. Helping to offset the increased healthcare costs from excessive alcohol intake. Same with income taxes. Income taxes were used to pay for war, but after they were used by and large to set up social services that were previously unheard of or grossly underfunded. Like healthcare, government pensions, welfare, education, etc etc etc. And.. contrary to popular belief, taxes seldom disappear. They find their way back into the economy from public employees as well as public contracts tendered to private companies. If you want to see money disappear.. try corporate tax cuts and corporate welfare. Great for executive bonuses and shareholder dividends that get locked away in offshore accounts while the little that gets spend mostly generates employment in places like Bangladesh.
@mahbriggs3 жыл бұрын
@@Bartonovich52 I see you belong to the Soviet school of economics.
@sawyerawr57833 жыл бұрын
Okay so is nobody going to comment on the fact that when Drach mentions the fact Tirpitz knew there would be a period he termed "the Danger Zone" and a still from Top Gun shows up? I had to stop the video for a second because I burst out laughing.
@dunamoose34462 жыл бұрын
timestamp?
@vikkimcdonough61532 жыл бұрын
@@dunamoose3446 16:58
@Duke_of_Petchington3 жыл бұрын
British Shipbuilding after 1906: *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* *Dreadnought Constructed* . Germany: What have I Done
@fabianmichaelgockner59883 жыл бұрын
Respont to last: "You ignored Bismarcks plan to ally with Britain."
@highjumpstudios23843 жыл бұрын
Iron curtain destroyed. Nuclear launch detected.
@skeletonwguitar43833 жыл бұрын
Germany: Otto Von Bismarck: TF HAVE YOU DONE, I LEFT JUST ONE DAY! ONE DAY!
@jacobkingsford52093 жыл бұрын
British Dreadnought construction was the fastest capital ship production in History, the only other that came close was the construction of the Essex class, and it was also easier to build them
@pedrofelipefreitas26667 ай бұрын
The brits after WW1: *depressed drinking* I'll never do this again *signs Washington treaty*
@abhaybishnoi31523 жыл бұрын
The decision to challenge the British at sea was according to me the pivotal reason and final nail in the coffin for the possibility of any Anglo-German alliance against the French. Bismarck would have been pissed.
@silverhost97823 жыл бұрын
A move that makes Barborossa look almost reasonable and well thought out in comparison
@abhaybishnoi31523 жыл бұрын
@@silverhost9782 Based on the recent performance of the Red Army in the Winter war, Stalin's purges wiping out the competent leadership and the experience of the German empire in the First World war against the Russians, a much more powerful Wehrmacht overpowering a disorganized Red Army would have been the common wisdom.
@mattwoodard25353 жыл бұрын
Bismarck had a plan, he always had a plan. And these people did just about everything they could NOT to follow that plan. sm
@scottgiles75463 жыл бұрын
@@mattwoodard2535 And they did not even keep "the right wing strong" which would have had them dancing in Paris in 1914.
@abhaybishnoi31523 жыл бұрын
@UNSCForwardontodawn That is absolutely true but here I'm telling about the mentality Hitler and other members of the German high command had. Rudimentary logistics issues were ignored.
@Diego-zz1df3 жыл бұрын
Germany: Tries to be a relevant sea power Britain: "And I took that personally"
@Jon.A.Scholt3 жыл бұрын
I'm imagining the Michael Jordan "Last Dance" meme now.
@davidchambers86973 жыл бұрын
It's hard not to take it personally when someone builds one of the largest and most powerful navies in the world specifically to threaten you. And for no other purpose.
@johnathanblackwell99603 жыл бұрын
@@davidchambers8697 More like, how do I defend what little territory I have against the worlds largest and most powerful empire since the Spanish, when I'm mostly a land power
@davidchambers86973 жыл бұрын
@@johnathanblackwell9960 What was the German Navy meant to defend from Britain, exactly? They didn't need a Navy to defend against a British invasion, as the German Army was 10-20 times stronger than the British one. Coastal cities? Hamburg was the only important one, and it is dozens of miles up the river Elbe. Or was the Navy meant to defend German shipping and overseas colonies? When war broke out, they didn't even try to. The High Seas Fleet wasn't meant to defend against anything. As this video explicitly pointed out, the purpose of the Risk Fleet was to threaten the one remaining uncommitted major power in Europe. And it ran right into the welcoming arms of Germany's enemies.
@minimax94523 жыл бұрын
Thatcher said: We fought them twice and they are back again ;-) She was right - all the best from Germany!
@samrobinson5663 жыл бұрын
I recently read Robert K Massie's "Dreadnought", and can heartily recommend it as a fascinating insight into the dreadnought arms race - I'm also delighted that Boat Daddy has done this video too - thank you Sir! 😊
@michaelsommers23563 жыл бұрын
That book is so big that it takes longer to read than it took _Dreadnought_ to be built.
@samrobinson5663 жыл бұрын
@@michaelsommers2356 it's also very useful if you need to prop up a car on a jack, or stun a burglar robbing your house 😆
@Tuning34343 жыл бұрын
Boat Daddy?! Oh my!!
@samrobinson5663 жыл бұрын
@@Tuning3434 well, when it comes to story time about boats, who is the Daddy? 😎
@avgj03783 жыл бұрын
Doing research after reading Massie's books is what led me to finding Drachinifel's channel.
@michaelleslie29133 жыл бұрын
Eyes full of tears by the end just like the Von Spee Falklands video . I study Naval history and often find it hard to see the lines, finally those sailors who cheered on both sides quite possibly were the grandson's of men who fought at Waterloo, so sad .
@sukritbera52443 жыл бұрын
I've never seen a more fitting video title.
@neilwilson57853 жыл бұрын
This guy has a terrific way of describing complex issues.
@BklynBruzer3 жыл бұрын
Tirpitz really put Germany on the highway to the danger zone
@VersusARCH3 жыл бұрын
So the naval arms race that led to the Battle of Jutland was driven by two admirals who wanted to avoid a war by means of deterrence?
@trauko13883 жыл бұрын
Ssssshhhhhh... when talking about Germany we use the terms "provocation", "luxury fleet" and "risk fleet", that is what propaganda calls for. Please avoid using non-propaganda terms.
@TomFynn Жыл бұрын
Captain Blackadder : You see, Baldrick, in order to prevent war in Europe, two superblocs developed: us, the French and the Russians on one side, and the Germans and Austro-Hungary on the other. The idea was to have two vast opposing armies, each acting as the other's deterrent. That way there could never be a war. Private Baldrick : But, this is a sort of a war, isn't it, sir? Captain Blackadder : Yes, that's right. You see, there was a tiny flaw in the plan. Private Baldrick : What was that, sir? Captain Blackadder : It was bollocks. "Blackadder Goes Forth, Goodbyeeee"
@generalsupreemo97769 ай бұрын
Next, let's hear about "Great Moments in Diplomacy", starting with the Naval Treaties and ending with the Sudatenland.
@errorcrj1103 жыл бұрын
Approximate timeline to the tune of "Anything you can do" [ 1905 ] Britain: "Anything you can build, I can build better" *builds Dreadnought* [ 1906 ] Britain: "I can build anything better than you" *builds Bellerophons* [ 1907 ] Germany: "No you can't" *builds Nassaus* [ 1908 ] Britain: "Yes I can" *builds St. Vincents* Germany: "No you can't" *builds Helgolands" [ 1909 ] Britain: "Yes I can" *builds Neptune, Colossus and Hercules* [ 1910 ] Germany: "No you can't" *builds Kaisers* Britain: "Yes I can!" *builds Orions* [ 1911 ] Britain: "Yes I can!" *builds King George Vs* (And so on and so forth)
@glennricafrente583 жыл бұрын
Awesome
@frankjeaguer36433 жыл бұрын
You never disappoint with your content. You deserve so much more for how much time you put into your videos. You should be teaching naval history at an ivy league school, but I thank you for sharing your knowledge with poor bastards like me.
@Joisey113 жыл бұрын
The Ivy League has no interest in European history anymore, except as propaganda to villify Europeans.
@jamesgoacher16063 жыл бұрын
You had some stunning photographs to accompany this episode. In particular the two of Fisher were notable.
@galahadthreepwood93943 жыл бұрын
“What are Winston’s reasons for acting as he does in this matter? Of course, it can’t be from conviction or principle, the very idea of him having either is enough to make anyone laugh”. Churchill always was a scoundrel.
@trauko13883 жыл бұрын
How can you dare say that of Saint Winston!!!
@galahadthreepwood93943 жыл бұрын
@@trauko1388 lol!
@Alpostpone3 жыл бұрын
@@trauko1388 Saint of Scoundrels?
@dantreadwell74213 жыл бұрын
Oh man, that near broke me. Rofl
@looinrims2 жыл бұрын
Guy was almost as bad as Hitler and Stalin, but “muh bulldog spirit!”
@jakemillar6493 жыл бұрын
This video couldn't come at a better time. I have a test next week in which I have to write 200 words about WW1. I was thinking about writing about the development of the Dreadnought battleship and battlecruiser, and this will really help. Thanks Drach.
@77gravity3 жыл бұрын
"shell magnets" - I almost spit my coffee.
@parolof Жыл бұрын
"shell magnet ", such a wonderful description of a ship. 🙂
@chrisk12083 ай бұрын
I have an army background, but I think knowledge about other domains make you more complete. So I enjoy the historic naval content on this channel.
@taylorpagotto95883 жыл бұрын
Drach, you say you hate politics but you're really good at explaining political situations when need be.
@Drachinifel3 жыл бұрын
I like to imagine that my disdain for all politicians might give me an outside perspective :)
@jai40853 жыл бұрын
Perfect timing! Next week I’m preparing my students for their classes next year, World War One is a a topic they’ll cover but this ties in well covering their course. Thanks for making my lesson planning easier and for another great video.
@kineticdeath3 жыл бұрын
I got given a book not too long ago, printed in the 80's about the history and development of battleships and then i find this channel and its totally taken me in, finally subbed and now looking forward to weeks or months of informative viewing
@creativehorse79073 жыл бұрын
This very much reminds me of the Mers El Kabir video years ago by Drach, with the English officer supposed to have his birthday cake on a French ship that at any moment could be shot to bits.
@CanalTremocos3 жыл бұрын
Always a treat when Drach discusses geostrategy.
@Big_E_Soul_Fragment3 жыл бұрын
Germany: Wants to have a powerful navy Admiral Fisher: *My time has come*
@waverleyjournalise57573 жыл бұрын
_loads 20 inch guns_ For Blighty!
@looinrims2 жыл бұрын
What a weird name
@JudeKincer3 жыл бұрын
Ahhh, nothing like falling to sleep to the dulcet tones of Drach. Thanks for another great video bud!
@skeletonwguitar43833 жыл бұрын
And then suddenly hearing that ending, you start crying internally I know i did
@CFarnwide3 жыл бұрын
I started out doing the same, falling asleep and having sweet little ship dreams. After a while I became so engrossed in the stories it just kept me awake longer! 😂 Now, I save Drach videos for days when I can devote my full attention to them. 😎
@witchkinglp3 жыл бұрын
That ending was so somber...really makes you think. Excellent work as always Drach.
@SA-xf1eb3 жыл бұрын
Yes, starting off Wednesday the right way. Thank you!
@marcusfranconium33923 жыл бұрын
Fun fact the dreadnaught race . also involved the german and dutch relations . For one the dutch had shipbuilding expertise , and 4 large comercial shipyards that could build dreadnaughts and other ship types. With the dutch interest in ordering 9 dreadnaughts and german companies more than willing to work with dutch shipyards and companies would provide those yards and equiment manufacturers with valuable experience . and what would be more perfect for germany to have 4 extra shipyards with 2 large drydocks to extend the capacity to build more dreadnaughs battle cruisers and or other large ships. Germania werf , krupp and Blom&Vos all had good relations with the dutch . it could have been an interesting cooperation . As the dreadnaught or battleships designed for the dutch would be improved kaiser class ships with 4 double turrets of 14 inch guns in superfiring position 2 more 6 inch guns , slighly less armour but decent speed. the same for the Java class cruisers , a cooperation betewen germania werf and dutch ship builders at the time they where layed down 1916 they where the most powerfull cruisers underconstruction . ( sadly they where launched after the war with great delayes due to cutting back on defense spending in the aftermath of the great war)
@GARDENER423 жыл бұрын
Another presentation of the superb quality we've come to expect. Thanks Drach.
@Martin_Adams1843 жыл бұрын
An especially strong "whistlestop tour" (as Drach calls it). The ability to mix political philosophy and action, ambitions, industrial strength etc. etc, into a coherent narrative is not easy. Well done!
@barrydysert29743 жыл бұрын
There's nothing quite like a full Rum Ration at 06:30 hours to start my Wednesday off right! Thanks Drach!:-)
@GrumpyGrobbyGamer3 жыл бұрын
What an amazing stroll through the 35 or so years before the Great War. Really riveting stuff. Thank you Drach
@admiralgoody3 жыл бұрын
Wait Drach, didn’t you already do a video on this? Or have I watched too many of your videos referencing the Anglo-German arms race?
@mohdafnanazmi16743 жыл бұрын
I think it the latter because the number of historicaly significant ship produce due to Anglo-German arms race I can't be sure if your question is an inside joke or a serious question 😅
@Drachinifel3 жыл бұрын
I've mentioned it many times, occasionally at length, but I don't remember doing a specific video on it before. 😀
@SuperchargedSupercharged3 жыл бұрын
@@Drachinifel Thats ok, I have been watching you for the last 3 years. I get confused on if I have watched this before. LOL I am almost all the way through all the Drydock videos for the 4th time!
@karlvongazenberg83983 жыл бұрын
If that so Drachiwood's remakes are better, than "mousewoods" :)
@neils1323 жыл бұрын
Dr Alexander Clarke did a series on Dreadnought construction a couple of months back - perhaps that was what you remembered?
@amerikanish073 жыл бұрын
Drach, that was an amazing half hour that left me with goosebumps. You've outdone yourself.
@Taz_XE0763 жыл бұрын
To all Sabaton fans I'm calling it now, the song Dreadnought on their next album will be about this and not Jutland. Hope I'm wrong, but I'll be back come March to see if I got it right or not
@Dohlenblick3 жыл бұрын
"On the cold waves from the North Sea, frrrom Shore to Sea to Shore, A silent battle rrrages, -As Fisher and Tirpitz square off: It's Naval Dominance or war! (Riff-)"
@gokbay30573 жыл бұрын
Possibly could be about Dreadnought herself.
@aristosachaion_2 жыл бұрын
It's about Jutland.
@mbryson28993 жыл бұрын
I never thought I'd see Maverick on this channel. Thank you sparing us from the song.
@troo_66563 жыл бұрын
The end is really tragic. The navies had friendships and admiration for one another yet politics got in the way. In a way it remened me of Admiral Scheer never getting to visist his oponent from Jutland admiral Jellicoe after the war.
@rishakrisha7773 жыл бұрын
That last bit almost brought me to tears.. I can't imagine what was going on in the heads of all the naval officers and servicemen fighting each other a month after they enjoyed friendly terms and completion.
@charlesjmouse3 жыл бұрын
Excellent! No doubt another half hour very well spent!
@bigsarge20853 жыл бұрын
Intriguing bit of naval history, thank you!
@timarmbruster66933 жыл бұрын
Just the right timing for the upload
@anicecreamsandwich85693 жыл бұрын
Just before I have to leave for the bus! Perfect timing! Riveting stuff!
@Bob.W.3 жыл бұрын
The same Schleswig-Holstein that opened WW2 in Danzig harbor.
@minimax94523 жыл бұрын
It opened the Polish - german war.
@romaboo62183 жыл бұрын
@@minimax9452 oh you consider ww2 starting in asia? Cool
@tltc1913 жыл бұрын
You mean Gdansk. Fixed it for you.
@minimax94523 жыл бұрын
@@tltc191 Danzig - founded by Germans😅😎🇩🇪
@romaboo62183 жыл бұрын
@@tltc191 *Danzig
@AlanCovell Жыл бұрын
Ah, Drach, your commentary is priceless! You sir, by using facts from and the quotes of the main players, with you own sparking wit,lift you to the level of an “Oscar Wilde” for naval history!
@simonrook57433 жыл бұрын
Loving the use of Tom Cruise at the mention of the Danger Zone!
@fastdoorslammers56993 жыл бұрын
Great job, Drach! One of your best Wednesday videos yet!
@charliekk33773 жыл бұрын
I've been looking forward to this
@Benepene3 жыл бұрын
Every week I am stunned by the sheer knowledge and dedication frlm drach. Greetings from Germoney
@bubbasbigblast85633 жыл бұрын
Germany: "Britian won't fight a war that can't make it money!" Also Germany: *Does Exactly That*
@greycatturtle71323 жыл бұрын
XD
@jamesbugbee68123 жыл бұрын
And, for the first time, so did Britain.
@bubbasbigblast85633 жыл бұрын
@@jamesbugbee6812 The real irony is that Britian hoped Germany would agree to a quick peace, because Britian knew Germany couldn't actually afford to fight the war, and assumed Germany knew that too.
@jacobkingsford52093 жыл бұрын
@@bubbasbigblast8563 Britain: Germany I assumed you had a basic intelligence. It appears I were wrong, and for making me wrong I will destroy you
@CorePathway8 ай бұрын
US defense industry: hold our beers
@jeebusk3 ай бұрын
this was a very good documentary, I haven't seen them this long in a while
@austin03513 жыл бұрын
That last few minutes is just one of a million perfect examples of why politicians should be treated as the scum of the earth
@DrHavoc13 жыл бұрын
This is rapidly becoming my favourite channel on KZbin, and im not even that much of a boat buff
@augustosolari77213 жыл бұрын
Actually, some of the competition also arose from the merchant Navy... During a fleet Review the Kaiser visited the RMS Teutonic AND Said "we must have some of this"...
@samwecerinvictus3 жыл бұрын
And RMS Teutonic was a fine ship.
@augustosolari77213 жыл бұрын
@@samwecerinvictus it was indeed
@jimpollard93923 жыл бұрын
I wonder if Tirpitz left any commentary on his opinion of Mahan. Willhelm II seemed to be quite taken with Mahan, and I'm sure this suited Tirpitz just fine, but I wonder if Tirpitz was influenced.
@PoorMan9723 жыл бұрын
On matters naval you could not oppose Wilhelm. If he was a Mahan fan you were too. Actually that's no mental stretch at all for Tirpitz; he's totally Mahanian. The Kaiser ordered copies of The Influence to be placed in every naval vessel's wrdroom.
@timothycook29173 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure how great the Germans could rock a gunboat, but they sure knew how to rock a beard
@AnimeSunglasses3 жыл бұрын
You don't want to rock a gunboat much, they don't have much freeboard AND it makes it hard to aim!
@alibizzle20103 жыл бұрын
I'm in the middle of Massey's book at the moment. It is slightly comic when the Germans designated Britain as the main enemy to justify the fleet rather than vice-versa
@michaelkovacic26083 жыл бұрын
Great video! One thing I missed a bit was the explanation as to why the Germans stuck to their 12inch gun. Had more money been available, the Königs could have been upgunned, but the Naval Laws assumed a steady price for each BB as time went on, which was of course not the case. However, it might have been possible to come up with a 350mm gun, like the one used on the Mackensen class later, and drop the midship turret in exchange. Nevertheless, in my opinion the König and Derfflinger classes were the best 12inch gunned BBs and BCs ever built.
@trauko13883 жыл бұрын
32cm guns were considered and dropped for the Konigs, due to cost. Triple turrets too. The Bayerns were supposed to have 40cm guns, guess what happened?
@michaelkovacic26083 жыл бұрын
@@trauko1388 I think they finally learnt their lesson when they drew up the L20ea design with its 420mm guns. Although the G3-class battlecruiser was a far superior design when compared to the L20ea.
@jimpollard93923 жыл бұрын
This was very good, Drach. It got me pumped up all over again, waiting for "Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts" to drop on Steam.
@535phobos3 жыл бұрын
Play some Rule the Waves in the mean time. UA:D wont come that soon
@LiveErrors3 жыл бұрын
It is Worth noting that Bismarck was in some ways responsible to germany gaining a bigger naval interest. The 2nd Schleswig war showed prussia how it felt to not having any ses controll at all
@scotthill87873 жыл бұрын
I've watched this 3 times now since it dropped on Wednesday (It's Friday.) I've learned something with each viewing.
@faeembrugh9 ай бұрын
I went to Orkney with my then German girlfriend and her father ( who happened to then be a Kapitän zur See in the Bundesmarine) and his comment on the scuttling of much of the Imperial German Navy at Scapa Flow was 'for all it mattered, it would have been better if we spent all that money on torpedo boats!'
@cavalierliberty68383 ай бұрын
DO YOU SEE TORPEDO BOATS?
@duwop5443 жыл бұрын
Love all the pictures, thank you.
@trauko13883 жыл бұрын
Dreadnought had been built so fast as a PR stunt, they were forced to cannibalize two pre-dreads under construction to do it.
@highjumpstudios23843 жыл бұрын
It proved to be the right decision overall to be honest.
@trauko13883 жыл бұрын
@@highjumpstudios2384 They had no choice, The IJN had already laid down theirs and the USN and KM already had designs ready and approved. The only thing left for the RN was to pretend they were acting and not reacting.
@highjumpstudios23843 жыл бұрын
@@trauko1388 they could have built yet another larger pre dreadnought.
@trauko13883 жыл бұрын
@@highjumpstudios2384 Sure, and they would have been mocked like the French for doing something so idiotic.
@highjumpstudios23843 жыл бұрын
@@trauko1388 Sounds like a personal problem then.
@agesflow68153 жыл бұрын
Drachinifel, Thank you.
@sthenzel3 жыл бұрын
Seems like Bismarck was the most reasonable one, Tirpitz the most ruthless/self-interested/narrow-minded, Wilhelm II the weakest, Fisher the most successful. Oh, and the countries themselves the most f...ed.
@Alsadius3 жыл бұрын
For Wilhelm, it's important to remember how gigantic his inferiority complex was on this issue. He was Victoria's eldest grandson, raised with a lot of British influence by his mother, but also heavy German influence from everyone else (obviously). He was also mildly deformed at birth, with one arm noticeably shorter than the other, which messed up his dreams of martial glory in the traditional army-based path of German rulers. And frankly, he was also a puerile little shit, whose sense of humour and ego would have fit in a middle school even when he had been Kaiser for decades. So he was a total mess psychologically, obsessed with showing up his uncle Edward and cousin George on naval matters - he spent decades competing in various sailing races against them, and poured inordinate amounts of effort into winning them. Then he gave interviews to the British press to try to improve relations where he said things like "You English are mad, mad, mad as March hares"...yeah. Bismarck was sensible but bad at developing durable structures of government, Tirpitz was just a naval obsessive who didn't really care about anything else, and Fisher was incredibly competent, but...unique. (For a fun bit of trivia, the first known use of "OMG!", in the same sense we use it today, was in a letter Fisher wrote.)
@PoorMan9723 жыл бұрын
@@Alsadius If there had been a "second Bismarck" or if he were granted two lifetimes, World War One would not have occurred. No WWI = no WWII. Far from a likable personality but compared to the statesmen, kings and emperors around him, a tower of intellect, a chess master who could foresee consequences the others would never even know existed. I have a soft spot for a man who recorded in his diary, "was up all night hating."
@sthenzel3 жыл бұрын
@@Alsadius Perfect! Much more elaborate than I could´ve said it. They all had their shortcomings, but the one with the most unfortunately had the most power.
@LuizAlexPhoenix3 жыл бұрын
Bismarck had a real flaw though, he couldn't conceive of a chaotic world. He was the ideal encapsulation of the times he lived, he followed the ideals of discipline and enlightened autocracy to where he couldn't conceive of such a fuck up like Willy and Nicky taking hold of the preeminent continental european empires. His folly was that he was a great leader to himself but it didn't matter what the thought, to Willhelm II he was a stubborn old fool.
@minimax94523 жыл бұрын
And on the british side they were smart, intelligent and driven by the highest ethics 😂
@arthursandomine54648 ай бұрын
Seing this race makes me think the war was inevatible. What a phenomenal video!
@anthonystejan84923 жыл бұрын
Some facts I believe about the Imperial German Navy's ships: The Nassau class was seriously powerful and showed their force at Jutland. The Von Der Tann was underestimated by the British The Derfflinger and Lutzow were undoubtedly the best battlecruisers of WW-I The Kaiser and Konig classes were generally powerful for their time and matched the Iron Duke class The last German dreadnoughts in the Bayern class could have served up to early WW-II and act as commerce raiders in the Atlantic
@cheesedetectiverook59503 жыл бұрын
HMS Tiger generally takes the spot for best Battlecruiser of WW1
@satannstuff3 жыл бұрын
Bayern class would have been relevant even in 1945, had they somehow managed to survive until then. Not that this was particularly likely to happen.
@aristosachaion_2 жыл бұрын
No way would the Bayerns be used for commerce raiding. They were still dreadnoughts, which meant they were incredibly slow and unsuited to intercepting convoy routes. Moreover, if for some reason they ever did continue to use them right up until the end of the war, their final form would likely be similar to the QE refits.
@hanzzel60863 ай бұрын
Ehh, the Bayerns (and German capital ships in general, especially the Dreadnought BBs) had horrible armour layouts, it was only the shitty British shells the allowed the fleet to escape Jutland remotely intact. The proof is the extensive gunnery tests performed post-war on those ships, tests that left the British extremely unimpressed. The point that they calculated, based on post-war confirmed hits, that they where cheated out of sinking at least a half-dozen German capital ships by their faulty fuses.
@brittgardner29233 жыл бұрын
Excellent Wednesday Rum Ration. My wife is a history buff, and even she was listening intently.
@malcolmtaylor5183 жыл бұрын
Hence the "entente cordialle". Shame really as Fisher never wanted the nation involved in a slogging land fight and wanted to Copenhagen the German fleet in a pre emptive attack. The entente is a mystery really, since it could be foreseen that it could lock us into a land battle with the French allies. We even sold the Germans Helligoland Island before the war, where they might have based submarines. All of this is a very strange strategy to "save" an empire.
@ivanstrydom84173 жыл бұрын
Thank you for not using shitty clickbait titles / thumbnails. Your videos are informative and excellent , your video titles / thumbnails match this and I thank you.
@andreastiefenthaler38113 жыл бұрын
Don't know if this has been asked (and answered) before. Why were Japans submarines (which were allegedly among the best at the time) so ineffective? And why did the Japanese not use convoys being an island nation totally dependend on imports by sea? Convoys and u-boats were both very effectively used in WW1 and again in WW2 by the Allies and the Germans respectively. Didn't Japan look into that cornucopia of experience and data? Or did they and decide otherwise?
@stanislavkostarnov21573 жыл бұрын
you should put this in the Q&A, would love to hear Drach's answer my feeling.... they were faced with very different conditions
@michaelsommers23563 жыл бұрын
The Japanese did use convoys. Their escort to merchant ship ratio was higher than in the Atlantic. They were, however, sailing in more restricted seas than the Atlantic, and they had to sail through many choke points. As for submarines, they sank _Wasp,_ did in _Yorktown,_ and torpedoed _Saratoga_ every time she left port. That sounds effective to me. I don't think using them against merchants would have been practical, given the size of the Pacific.
@Executioner90003 жыл бұрын
Japanese submarine doctrine held that the subs should hang out near, and support, the Battle fleet. This meant that hunting merchants was a secondary task and limited their effectiveness (although they still had several successes against USN ships, see above). By contrast, the US and German navies unleashed their subs in unrestricted warfare, and gave them free range to hunt far and wide, wherever they could find ANY enemy shipping. This is why Japanese subs seem so ineffective compared to US and German subs in the same period.
@highjumpstudios23843 жыл бұрын
Japanese sub doctrine largely placed submarines on duty to sink enemy capital ships, you know. Aircraft carriers, battleships the like. It often didn't put them in a great situation to sink enemy merchant vessels.
@barrylucas86793 жыл бұрын
Once again interesting historical content and fascinating pictures. Thankyou
@gregorybrewer67763 жыл бұрын
I've noticed the early Dreadnoughts had foldable anti torpedo nets. Were they deployed only while the ship was at anchor or were they also used while the ships were under way? Why did they disappear?
@davidbrennan6603 жыл бұрын
They couldn’t be use effectively when underway, cumbersome, the weight of the net was also limited, later era Torpedoes could defeat them so they fell out of use.... harbours had defences with nets heavy enough so they stayed in use.
@trauko13883 жыл бұрын
They could be used at low speeds too, but they were also a hazzard, Derfflinger had some of its own knocked out and risked getting to the propellers, so they had to STOP MID BATTLE OF JUTLAND TO CUT THEM OFF! They were withdrawn form the HSF shortly after.
@Straswa2 жыл бұрын
Great vid Drach, love your content.
@dimitrikemitsky3 жыл бұрын
Admiral Fisher with the haircut in those pictures feels anachronistic. Looks like a guy you'd see working at a bank today.
@73Trident3 жыл бұрын
Great as usual, Thanks Drach.
@coolawesomeepicman45133 жыл бұрын
I would’ve loved to see an alt where hms dreadnought never existed and everyone had these silly little battleships shooting at each other in the First World War. Imagine how cool that would look
@rayalbaugh41493 жыл бұрын
Good Morning, I’ve been waiting!
@KG-ve3lc3 жыл бұрын
Seems a bit ironic that Bismarck's sistership is named after Tirpitz when the 2 didn't seem to get along. Not to mention Bismarck not wanting a super big Navy to begin with.
@hanzzel60863 ай бұрын
As another commenter said (paraphrased) "One has to imagine Bismark rolling in his grave when they named a ship that was effectively exactly the opposite of what he wanted after him. And him trying to claw his way out when they named it's sister after one of the men he despised the most"
@The980Junior3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Drach!!!
@ridbanner14073 жыл бұрын
Feel free to use the picture of the SMS Kaiser bow shield
@NigelDeForrest-Pearce-cv6ek8 ай бұрын
Excellent and Outstanding!!!
@project97013 жыл бұрын
"There was a period where Tirpitz referred to as 'The Danger Zone'"...I'm disappointed that I thought it was going to be an "Archer" reference, not a "Top Gun" one. Damn.
@mikepette44223 жыл бұрын
excellent stuff. summed it all up very succinctly
@zaelazar93753 жыл бұрын
In the year 1892, Drachinifel becomes chief of the navy staff in Germany, instead of von Tirpitz. How do you build up the German Navy moving forward, from 1892 until the early 1910s? Do you try to keep the Kaiserliche Marine a glorified coastal defense fleet? Or do you try to build a fleet that actually follows the Risk Theory as originally planned, instead of trying to outright beat the Royal Navy halfway through? We'll assume that you have as much funding as the German Empire can offer, and any politician who tries to cut your funding will be sent to Greenland for a permanent vacation Edit: guess I forgot to relpy to the pinned post so this is just a normal comment XD oops...
@SephirothRyu2 жыл бұрын
I imagine that, even without knowledge of what is to come (but still having at least the "essence" of knowing what he does about shis), Drach is a fairly level headed individual who would likely push for small numbers of superior vessels that remain well designed. Likely siding with Bismarck's thoughts of NOT antagonizing the English at sea, but perhaps still at least pushing for enough vessels to at least easily fend off any non-British alliances from messing with them. Of course, only Drachnifel himself can answer what he would actually do.
@frankemcgillivray66953 жыл бұрын
Outstanding work!
@bluemountain41813 жыл бұрын
Once it became clear to the Germans that they couldn't win the Dreadnought race was there a movement towards a "Jeune Ecole" style strategy to change the parameters of the arms race? You mentioned that German submarine and torpedo boat construction was increased but was this intended for commerce raiding and coastal defence or for taking on the British battle line?
@wolfsoldner90293 жыл бұрын
Many early submarines were coastal based. They most likely expected a harbor blockade.