आपकी बात मे कुछ दम है। पहले असली और नकली का फैसला होगा। फिर सच सामने आयेगा। अब तो गीदड़ भी शेर की खाल पहनकर घूम रहे हैं।
@deshpremi62956 жыл бұрын
@Kalu ram modi यहां हिन्दू सिख का सवाल नहीं है। यहां पर बात खालसे की है। खालसे मतलब है पाक साफ व सच्चा सुच्चा न कि भेखधारी खालसा। सच्चा आदमी किसी भी भेष मे हो सकता है।
@@punjabilive8461 वीर जी यह बात सही है कि धर्म और सच्चाई का राज होगा। यह जरूरी नहीं कि सिखों का राज होगा। सच्चे आदमी कोई और भी हो सकते हैं। उसके गलत अर्थ मत निकालो। मानवता भलाई के काम तो और संस्थाएँ भी कर रही हैं। डेरा सच्चा सौदा के प्रेमी भी सबसे ज्यादा मानवता भलाई का काम कर रहे हैं।
Khalsa Raj layi Khalistan banauna zaroori hai! Punjab vasda Guruan de naam! Punjab bachao, Panth bachao! Apna Sikh Virsa Bachao! Akal Takhat/SGPC nu Badal/RSS ton azaad karao!
@greatgirl60136 жыл бұрын
M K Not at all Khalistan meaning whole world Khalsa Guru ji not only visited Punjab they been to many other places So stop spreading such hatred without any knowledge
@MK-et3gj6 жыл бұрын
@@greatgirl6013 First free Akal Takht/SGPC from Badals/RSS! Sikh institutions have been infiltrated & vandalised. Without Khalistan, Sikhs cannot preserve "the roots". Sikhs are "ghulaami" in India. Raj bina na dharam chaleh hai, Dharam bina sab daleh maleh hai! What's hatred got to with Khalistan? Punjab is not Hind, it was a sovereign state before 1849. In 1947, Sikhs were promised an autonomous region by Nehru/Gandhi. Sikhs were betrayed & Sikh representatives refused to sign Indian Constitution in 1950. Khalistan is Sikh right to independence/sovereignity. It's Hindutva that is full of HATRED against Sikhs, Muslims, Christians & minorities in India.
@mandeepnagra20116 жыл бұрын
@@greatgirl6013 Khals da meaning hai pure ਸੁੱਧ ਸਭ ਸਹੀ ਹੈ ਬੀਬਾ ਜੀ ਤੁਸੀ ਆਪਣੀ ਸੋਚ ਬਦਲੋ
@punjabismachaarsmachaar9666 жыл бұрын
+Jatinder Singh hindu mean chor asi chor nei aa duniaa da sub too fudu phylosphy a thuhadi apne kol rakho sanu koi loor ni tuhadi
@A Holmes Well, I think you know better about human rights. Rights are only rights if they are claimed, enjoyed,protected and given out. While demanding our rights, we have to prove to have earned them ourselves and they can not be breached by both parties e.g protecror of human rights and the one enjoying the basic human rights. Accepting slavery is not a choice or option some times, but living like a slave certainly is! If some one is shredding your basic rights, given by nature and protected by states. If you believe in, what this writer is talking about, then good luck to you and happy independence But I believe that beyond Shri Guru Granth Sahib ji, Sikhs don't need another book. sikhs need to plan the future. Slave cant have and practice their own Rehat Maryada, Sikhs have right to vote and elect honest and capable leaders, Sikhs (Punjabi) choose to be slave to those leaders for their petty incentives and those leadres become slave to high power leaders. First we need to clean our own act. We fight in Gurudwaras, Sikh organisations, pracharks. We need to look back to write new future. We can not drive car looking into rearview mirror, we have to look straight front. Book is read advancing page by page. back pages are used for reference only. So we have law, basic human rights law, commissions, United nations. When questioned in UNO about sikh sovereignty, and 1984 genocide. Guess what is the answer: This whole situation started by Sikhs for not granting basic rights of religion and belief to other Sikh sects e.g Nirankaris. Sikhs went to stop them to practice their basic human rights. We killed 8, they killed 13, we killed 1 they killed lakhs and destroyed lakhs of families. Yes that is failure of Govt. to protect its citizens. What did we do about it. UNO doesn't have record if any complaint was filed except protest in front of UNO and memorandum. Long story short, no one of the Sikh helped victims except Phoolka ji. No one supported him. World was with us on this but we were no where. So friend , discussing slavery is easy to fight it takes strength and we have no energy