Apollo 14 in 24fps: Landing, Moonwalk & Liftoff

Support content like this and more at my Patreon: / dutchsteammachine
Join the Discord Server and chat with like-minded people: / discord
Contact: [e-mail]
Apollo 14 16mm taken during moon landing, EVA, Moonwalk and liftoff, interpolated from 12 to 24fps for your viewing experience. Synchronized with NASA & BBC audio.
16mm raw film: NASA
Audio: AFJ, Austin1987VCR, lunarmodule5
Processing: Dutchsteammachine

[@patrickcrowley4682]

Talk about the arc of a lifetime. Ed Mitchell was once a working cowboy in New Mexico back in the 1940's. Picturing him sitting around a campfire with some older cowboys who rode back when it was still the Wild West. None of them could have imagined that the young buck in their midst would one day, just some 30 odd years later, be walking on moon that shone above them.

[@SytheYT528]

how crazy is that?

[@SayakMunshi]

Thanks for reminding how time can change life for good.

[@A_Different_ViewPoint.]

💯

[@twiff3rino28]

He would have been about 15.

[@stephenburnage7687]

@@aemrt5745 My grandmother was born in 1888. She used to say that the hilight of her life was the invention of the movies and Charlie Chaplin in particular. The low point was losing two of her four brothers in WW1. She acknowledged the technical advances that you mention but they were generally too far removed from her everyday life to be very relevant.

[@bluelemon1394]

Imagine being one of these guys and looking back at the earth and saying “wow I’m on the damn moon.”

[@RideAcrossTheRiver]

"You seen one Earth, you seen 'em all!" -- Jack Schmitt, Apollo 17

[@RideAcrossTheRiver]

​@@EriPages Lunar landings were replicated five more times; and the first attempt was very nearly a failure. Also, there were four manned test missions prior to the Apollo 11 landing and many more unmanned ones. You have no idea what you're talking about.

[@garlik300]

@@EriPages indeed this happened in 1971

[@garlik300]

@@EriPages I don't even wanna waste my time trying to explain you some basic science... plus I will never never never believe you or whoever's gonna tell the moon landings are fake, you can tell whatever you want, I know the truth, you don't

[@patoconnor8256]

@@EriPages You're talking in riddles. There's no such word as"REALER". Go away and educate yourself.

[@Twenty-Seven]

We only have ever seen these events in non-HD video and audio, but imagine actually being there, looking through human eyes, with real color.

[@Bjowolf2]

@Juicewrld999 Of course it is - there is no atmosphere and thus no wind up there to make it flutter. There is a horizontal rod attached to the flag pole to make the flag look good instead of just hanging downwards, but the flag is only moving when the astronauts are putting it up or when they touch it, as they move closely by it - and for some time afterwards, since there is no atmosphere there to dampen its oscillations, only inner friction in the pole + rod + flag system.

[@Bjowolf2]

@Juicewrld999 Actually it wasn't - and it was probably blown over during take off by the high velocity exhaust gasses from the ascent module in the A11 case. No it wasn't just 5 ft away, but more like 15 - 20 or so. Anyway the two astronauts had a bit of trouble putting the flag pole up, because it turned out that the lunar soil was pretty hard beneath the thick layer of lunar dust, which of course didn't help either. So on (some of?) the later Apollo missions they would instead put up the flagpole a good bit further away from the LM, and secure the flag pole much better by drilling a hole for it in the hard lunar soil. And these later flag poles with the US flag flying from them still seem to be standing after all these years ( you can see their shadows ), when you look at the "close up" photos ( from a height of 20 - 25 km ) that were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LOR) that were taken of all 6 Apollo landing sites, when NASA shortly sent the LOR into a more elliptical orbit that allowed it to pass directly over them at relatively low altitudes.

[@JamieCrew]

@Bjowolf2 don't waste your brain on these retards. They have no life or purpose. They have to keep themselves busy by questioning the evidence of man's accomplishments and facts. Just ignore them.

[@Bjowolf2]

@@JamieCrew Yes, you are right, but it's easy to get caught up in their web of ignorance and their lack of curiousity and ability to think for themselves 😉 Thank you 😊

[@bradleyrex2968]

@Juicewrld999 The lander is 31 feet wide (leg to leg). To be 5 feet away from the engine you'd have to be under it.

[@jayjay-bz3rr]

These are the sharpest, most clear videos of the moon walk

[@rockethead7]

Well, he up-converts them with modern CGI, which also cleans it up a bit. But, yes, these were shot on 16mm film, which is far sharper than a low-res TV signal.

[@johnb9624]

Grow up you a flat earth course you are​@@harshil.pathania

[@cosminxz1076]

@@harshil.pathaniabrairot

[@internationaldaily9820]

This is at least 200 years ahead of time. Well done, Hollywood! Err... Hollymoon...

[@harshil.pathania]

@@cosminxz1076 you fr

[@Doubledeepfried]

And some kid reacting on another kid unboxing a happymeal gets millions of viewers. The moon seems a better place to be sometimes.

[@KougaJ7]

If that makes people happy, who are we to judge. Rather, we should be happy that there is also content for us out there.

[@furadice973]

the moon aint the kind kind of place to raise your kids. in fact its cold as hell, and then hot as hell, or something.

[@hauntified9060]

@@furadice973 Stand in the middle like a rotisserie chicken

[@furadice973]

@Van Guard Little boy blue and the man on mars.

[@TacShooter]

Why do you think I loved the show Space: 1999?

[@hopelessnerd6677]

" A little fast, not too bad..." Only landing on the moon. No big deal. They sure picked the right guys for the job.

[@FragGile]

Thinks it’s coined at NASA “the right stuff”. Brilliant.

[@edellis2960]

7min though out🤔 tHE LINES THAT R HOLDN da ASStronauts UP🤪 VERY VISUAL 9:27🤬.... FAKEM👀N LANDn4$ho

[@hopelessnerd6677]

@@edellis2960 Mwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

[@drutalero2962]

@@edellis2960 you're stupid af

[@brandonhopkins6251]

@@edellis2960 ya seriously you're a piece of shit, it would've been harder to fake the moon landing in 1969 than to just do it, and the astronauts left retroreflectors on the moon that are visible by telescope

[@joshuairwin2016]

It's amazing to think how much thrust it takes to escape the Earth, and how little it takes to escape the Moon.

[@MattF12765]

That's gravity for you.

[@marksprague1280]

Keep in mind that the total mass of the Apollo at Canaveral liftoff was 6,200,000 pounds, while the lunar ascender weighed less than 11,000 pounds. That was the biggest difference.

[@rukawacloudstrife2114]

Cgi studio shit 😂😂😂

[@ToiletThatRamsPeople]

@@rukawacloudstrife2114 Flat head bastard 💀

[@MyStellarSpace]

@@rukawacloudstrife2114 U dumb for real, man, CGI was primitive as hell up until the 80's when the industry finally started to hammer in and use it for entertainment and research

[@normtoon4914]

I was a kid during the Apollo programme but I still find these pictures magical all these years later.

[@rip7033]

@@normtoon4914 NPCs like you are RESULTS of human illusion experiments. You browse cuck porn too !

[@brianarbenz1329]

Same with me, both my age and my feeling about these images.

[@BonaniDrums]

I wish I wash born back then already. This Generation is absoloutely cooked, no ones Cares for science or anything else. I guess im the only one who's still interested in space and not watching skibidi toilet🤷‍♂️ The whole internet thinks the moonlanding is fake😂

[@brianarbenz1329]

@BonaniDrums Don't cede the whole internet over to the moon landing deniers side. The great majority of people know it was real.

[@poptya]

I cant wait for more lunar landing missions. Being able to see this is HD video will be incredible. The fact that this was done so many years ago with such little computational power is incredible. Much more focus on furthering the human race on a grand scale instead of worrying about cutting budgets

Maybe Artemis in 2025...

[@dollin9515]

Now it will be much more of a cake walk. Since our last visits to the big space rock, we've sent probes and impacters to verious hard to reach places of the solar system. only issue is getting a safe enough system and suit to do the job with a larger margin of safety this time. We only have our own corperations to beat now.

[@sblack48]

Speaking of budgets, Arthur C Clark once said that everything you saw in the movie 2001 A Space Odessy could have been developed for the cost of the vietnam war

[@philtackett5149]

China is trying to land humans on the moon by 2030 and on mars by 2033 is what I've been hearing. There's still a race with foreign powers.@@dollin9515

[@DuxFaver]

we will never go back, shits fake asf

[@_keano]

9:27 : me running back to check if I look stupid in the photo

[@joacogonzalez1430]

Underrated comment

[@aviquu]

this is so good dud

[@yonasohenry8590]

LOL 😂

[@triton6490]

Lmfao

[@Peter_1986]

I hate when people tell me to smile right before a photo - that just feels _unnatural._ I prefer when they take spontaneous photos of random cheerful moments instead.

[@timothybrittain4161]

That's the wonderful thing about having recorded events like this with film instead of the primitive video technology of the time. You can digitize it in HD as see it as never before.

[@jon_collins]

@@VolkerThimm the 10fps progressive scan valve based video cameras used for live broadcast.

[@Jeffrey314159]

@@jon_collins Not "valve" or vacuum tube based, except for the Epicon tube , which was a cross between a CRT and a silicon diode image matrix

[@5Andysalive]

There is tv footage from Apollo 17 EVA, many hours actually, that doesn't look too bad. Most people only seen the horrible (quality) one from Apollo 11. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHO2q5-Dn9V1q68 for example. I heard that 11's EVA tv was filmed of a monitor in the tracking station and then send to the US for tv. It certainly looks like that in original recordings.

[@counterstrike89]

Funny how only the technology for the moon was better in 1969 than it is in 2021.

[@counterstrike89]

@Andre I know, its a joke, just like everything the government is telling us. They lied saying meat and butter and eggs were bad, now were finding out they're opposite.

[@puricat]

sometimes i feel insecure about my intelligence and then i come to this video and sort the comments by newest and i feel better

[@Felipe-dq3dz]

me too

[@PMC47]

If anybody as a kid ever blew all their air out and sunk to the bottom of their pool just to take a few steps, you can still do it to a degree, but your natural buoyancy still wants to push you upwards. Kind of, well... exactly like being in a lower g state like in this video. You can see how they sort of drag their feet through the sand while walking. A 200 lb man weigh 33.2 lbs in 0.166g on the moon.

[@Gobrowns123]

What do you mean exactly

[@Styles1991]

@@Gobrowns123because everyone believes this sorcery it’s clearly computer generated

[@Gobrowns123]

@@Styles1991 I’m with you. It looks insanely fake.

[@MyLinguine]

Not sure if I’d be filled more with absolute terror or wonder. Being on the moon, *Being* on the moon.

[@-Subtle-]

Wonder. Even if you died there, you're doing something that only a handful of people have done. Even if you die, you're dying in the midst badass way.

[@MyLinguine]

@@-Subtle- That’s totally true up until a point. Every diver that died diving was a hero until diving became common place. Every aviator that died flying made headlines until flying became common. The fear of being forgotten far outweighs the simple fear of death

[@sheruandme3629]

​@@MyLinguine No one remains remembered for eternity, but what matters is how are you different from the society.

[@mandrill173]

hoax

[@jorgkitzig5928]

@@mandrill173 Idiot.

[@nedyrb133]

amazing. thanks for sharing. my words fail to describe the wonder of the cosmos unless i sit for a while and think

[@nedyrb133]

@yony artworks what does this mean? I think it's polish... jinkuyye (thank you) lol

[@frankthespank]

Greta Thunberg - How dare you!

[@mrloop1530]

@Greta Thunberg Yes, and Earth is flat, and it was created six thousand years ago by the one and only sky lord.

[@scudger99]

@Greta Thunberg Ahh yes, the be all and end all of solid evidence. A fucking KZbin video, made for numpties like you to lap up because you're too desperately thick to be able to tell.

[@carlkinder8201]

@Greta Thunberg I just went to the video in your link and "thumbs downed". I suggest everyone else do the same.

[@antoniousai1989]

I can't wait to see the Artemis 3 recorded images in HD when they will be back from the Moon on Earth with the future selected astronauts. It's gonna be life changing

[@kittywampusdrums]

yea!

[@MattF12765]

Yet still the fake moon landing morons will be out in force.

[@noodles5477]

9:56

[@TransitionedToAShark]

😂

[@K1LL1onaire]

We can’t and have never went to space, this is fraudulent

[@culveyhouse]

Finally. A channel with coherent comments and no tinfoil flatness.

[@sovsemnevazhno]

Just sort the comments by novelty... There is pure hell...

[@gives_bad_advice]

Where can i find that channel?

[@AntilleanConfederation]

Speed the video up to 1.5 during the moon walk. Your welcome

[@gives_bad_advice]

@@AntilleanConfederation *My* welcome? What about *your* welcome?

[@gabrielrousseau_NM]

Maybe you missed the wildly blowing flag. Lots of people tried forcing other people to wear masks for their safety. Easy to herd people when their faithless.😢

[@osu28fan]

This is why there were reports of massive episodes of depression from these astronauts for years after this mission. The high they must’ve experienced from this mission, to experience that and then to come back to earth, never to leave again.

[@philipp-q5f]

Or maybe they were forced to tell a lie

[@GIJames]

@@philipp-q5f Reaching like all moon landing deniers

[@Boxscot49]

@@philipp-q5fhow dumb do you have to be…

[@philipp-q5f]

@@GIJames I'm not convinced either way

[@Bennysol]

The depression was living a lie the rest of their life with a gun pointed at them 24/7. Just look at the interview of buzz and niel afterwards.

[@jerrycampbell9376]

My folks took me to the Cape for the launch of this mission. I still recon it as one of the high points of my life. 8 miles away, and we could feel the thunder of the liftoff through our feet as we watched. Followed the rest of the mission on TV, daily.

[@AndiAndi-ce4jj]

Thats very cool

[@JamesChristianLee]

Woah lucky i wish

[@PanzerkampfwagenausfTschechosl]

@@jr9710 oh, so I guess all of the billions of other people who have an IQ above room temperature are also lying? That hundreds of years ago people like Galileo figure out the planet was round, hundreds of years later apparently it is flat again? Or at least to the small amount of people who apparently “know the truth”

[@PanzerkampfwagenausfTschechosl]

@@quantumpotential7639 please shut up

[@kimjongun2946]

But you had no clue it was only going to circle at lower Earth orbit and come right back. Then we were shown this footage from a Hollywood studio.

[@acebubbles5023]

I love watching footage from the apollo days. truly incredible

[@Motleymick]

Fake. Because NASA lied. USA lied . They all lied .......they never went !

[@thewildcellist]

@@Motleymick lying works only for things that cannot be objectively proven, like God, or Santa Claus. Apollo can be proven thus, so lying won't work. Sorry.

[@Motleymick]

@@thewildcellist Just because they made the Apollo does not prove it landed on the moon then flew back to earth. 230,000 miles each way on a single tank of fuel. Sorry not sorry.

[@thewildcellist]

@@Motleymick "a single tank of fuel?" Yikes. Space isn't called "space" for nothing. As astronaut Bill Anders put it while enroute to the Moon on Apollo 8, “...Isaac Newton is doing most of the driving now.” Once a spacecraft has momentum, there're no impediments (like atmosphere) to stop it or slow it down, so it takes less fuel than you might think to travel those 230+ thousand miles.

[@Motleymick]

You've been watching too much Star Trek.

[@therunningman8692]

CGI in the 60s and 70s was way ahead of its time…

[@honasansaquido6266]

Every VFX artist said that it is more impossible to create a CGI on 60s technology than going to the moon. So going to the moon is much easier than making a fake video in 1969 😂

[@thedailyremedy968]

You don’t need it on set, with models, wires-only providing a select time length of footage

[@samuelreichman8676]

its just a joke guys

[@Kowalski_at-Bayern]

Your joking, right?

[@vwlssnvwls3262]

I love seeing historic pictures, and wondering about the people and places in them. This was no different, wondering what the astronauts must have felt, thought, said in the moments that we don't see on video. Imagining what went on around the flag, and the vehicle that were left behind. There is so much life in everything, and everyone, it would take multiple lifetimes to explore it all, but I am just happy for a glimpse of even the smallest bits.

[@From_SemiRechija]

Look again kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJnZeaKNeLeohJI it looks funny

[@DoubleoP]

Don't be so gullible.

[@DoubleoP]

@Smee Self wow, you're so clever. 😀

[@MrDaiseymay]

WEll they were asked such things in the post landing Press Questions, that lasted 90 mins. All three distinctly looked like they rather be on the moon that being there.

[@SquirrelASMR]

Lifting off the moon is the coolest part. The fraction of the effort to escape the moons gravity well is so small.

[@olasek7972]

J Calhoun education for those morons is like red cape to a bull

[@benjialbert3317]

@J Calhoun 🤣 enjoy

[@SquirrelASMR]

@@nikola.trafojer if you claim to know anything about physics... why are you mixing up mass and weight? Pssshhhhh....

[@BigMisterApple]

@@nikola.trafojer Tbh thats not really the odd part. Jumping your vehicle into the 'air' and then activating thrust to escape the gravity isnt all that hard to do, hell you could do the same with fireworks on Earth, just throw it in the air right before lift off.

[@МаксимМовчан-щ3м]

Moon escape velocity is 2.4 km/s. not sure that required effort is small.

[@ValensBellator]

I love how you can hear the long delay between the on-site communication and the echo of them receiving it.

[@michaelclentworth1283]

Let's see the hoaxtards try and explain that.

[@fantin298]

Michael Clentworth i mean if I was a director making a movie about people going on the moon but shot in a studio, I would take in consideration the communication delay

[@omniyambot9876]

@@fantin298 ya, these pseudo science moon landing must be stopped lol. they're even making fun of smart anti moon landing ew

[@FokoPoko991]

OH NO! MY FOOT TRANSFORMED INTO A FOOT, WITH YOUR ASS WRAPED AROUND IT! Rly, go back 2 4chan

[@michaelbarnhart2593]

Actually, I have longer delays than this using my cell phone calling my friends in The Rockies in 2021. ;-)

[@federicozimerman8167]

Love the way they speak, the intonation the accents, the whole thing sounds so good😊

[@ChrizRockster]

I love watching how far the dust flies... it keeps going and going.

[@joevignolor4u949]

True. Recently someone did a study and determined that some of the dust kicked up by the LM's descent engine may have traveled a quarter of the way around the moon before it finally came down.

[@TheAechBomb]

@@joevignolor4u949 one of the apollo missions also landed near (few hundred feet, I think) a probe we landed earlier, and the dust pretty much stripped all the paint off it and destroyed its lens

[@joevignolor4u949]

@@TheAechBomb You are talking about Apollo 12. They also cut off the probe's TV camera and its robotic arm that had scooped up some lunar soil. Both of those components were brought back and are now in a museum and I've seen them on display. Also, the TV camera had live bacteria living inside of it that was there when the camera was manufactured. It had survived several years being on the moon.

[@TheAechBomb]

@@joevignolor4u949 I didn't know which one it was, thank you

[@andrewkuhne2586]

The only time that flag will ever be 'blowing in the wind'

[@therestorationofdrwho1865]

This looks far more natural. 24 FPS is a sweet spot. Doesn’t even look interpolated if you hadn’t seen the original footage.

[@alexei.1327]

@@mariepiThere is no stars because the Moon is so bright, if you look up at the nightsky and look for the moon you can see how bright it is yet how dark it is in this Video, that's because they have to turn down the sensitivity of the Camera for it to not look like a white blinding mess.

[@ok.6539]

@@mariepi Im tired of people like you. Stars are not visible cause the camera is recording a really bright surface, and the exposures time was fast, stars are dim, not giving the camera enough light to show up in the photos.

[@kevza1978]

@@ok.6539 What an ignorant reply. It's quite possible the person has no knowledge of this, or could be a young person.

[@Ripcraze]

@@kevza1978 Maybe they should learn to educate themselves before implying it's fake then. Young people more than anyone should know how easily you can get information with a 2 second google search.

[@georgedawson235]

@@Ripcraze he only said there was no stars and now we've educated him as to why there was no need for everyone to jump down his throat

[@jacoposilvestri543]

notice the flag doesent move unless they touch it

[@nebtheweb8885]

Correct.

[@langraman8756]

it flaps

[@neilbishop1686]

@@langraman8756 Really flaps during the liftoff..

[@nebtheweb8885]

@@neilbishop1686 You would too if you were standing next to that exhaust. As for the movement that is nothing more than the flexible tubular aluminum pole being twisted and moved when it is being touched. It never moved after they left it alone.

[@news_internationale2035]

@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 That's just the wind.

[@paulcontursi5982]

My dad and I attended that liftoff in person. Mind blowing!

[@BobKermanKsp1]

damn, your dad is lucky

[@CountDrunkula]

This stuff is incredible. Even though I know the outcome I get so nervous watching the landing and the lengthy ascent. The improved frame rate makes it more real - and more scary! Thanks so much.

[@rawnukles]

Yeah I was a little worried they were gonna run out of fuel on decent. Maybe we can hear the nerves in their voices.

[@PanzerkampfwagenausfTschechosl]

@@TheOneNashon how?

[@quantumpotential7639]

I get that way every time I watch Apollo 13 the movie.

[@cryptogods1945]

It’s fake

[@bullymaguire4457]

@@rawnuklesWell that wouldn’t happen because the place they filmed it they had a fuel station near by, Hollywood always comes prepared bro !

[@kasimirmaser99]

I knew Edgar Mitchell. On my desk, I've got a really nice autographed photo of him holding a map on the Moon that Al Shepard took during one of their EVAs. It's always so wild to hear a friend's familiar voice in these recordings from the lunar surface. It really is a small world - or pair of worlds in this case. Thanks for posting this footage.

[@kasimirmaser99]

@Крым,Ялта ,Александр. Nope, not stupid at all. There is no air or wind on the moon. The flag had a horizontal metal tube inserted in a pocket sewn along the top edge. That was to hold the flag out and make it look like it was fluttering in the breeze. Otherwise, it would just drape down over the pole and not be very visible. The movement you can see is the flag settling down after being rammed into the lunar surface. With no air, there's no air resistance on the Moon, so it takes a while for the motion to settle down due to inertia. There is solar wind, but that works differently and would not cause the flag to flutter. Solar wind particles have very little mass and you would not notice any movement they might cause.

[@joshuasasfire2759]

Edgar said it’s was a hoax

[@danb7211]

@@joshuasasfire2759source please. I’d like to see that for myself.

[@bullymaguire4457]

I’m here to tell you that this shit was faker than unicorns!

[@ThomasKundera]

@@bullymaguire4457 : naive.

[@kpmac1]

This is remarkable. Those landings were maybe the biggest human accomplishment in history. I love this stuff.

[@abeezy2696]

😂😂😂

[@mandrill173]

fake af

[@toaster3822]

So fake. As an engineer, the tech they had in the 60s wasnt anywhere close to landing on the moom and Taking back off, without any errors, on the first try...

[@mandrill173]

@@toaster3822 I'll also point out that the earth is flat, which falsifies the moon landing on its own.

[@kpmac1]

@@toaster3822 the first try? Are you aware of how many Apollo missions there were? Also, the Russians were watching this from both the inside and outside. If it was a fake, why didn’t they say anything? They would’ve known. There was a huge issue of prestige at play and they acknowledged the achievement.

[@nAvioMargot]

Film fantascientifico...fatto molto bene..👍🏻

[@danieleciavatta7522]

Ha ha ha... vero.

[@TheGary600]

Very grateful to be able to watch this, I was nine when this film was first taken. As an adult, I wonder at the lack of progress in developing habitats on the moon and elsewhere. I watched this video with adult eyes and saw the lunar surface through times different lenses, noticing mounds, projections and various anomalies I would never have considered as a young fellow. Thank you again it is every bit as awe inspiring but better, different.

[@mcreal109]

Too bad it was just in a movie set

[@oldschoolgenius8069]

@@mcreal109how you know?

[@oldschoolgenius8069]

You can’t prove is fake

[@Bruh-zc3qs]

​@@mcreal109shame, China just give the 'fake moon landing' conspiracy theorists a big slap by taking pictures of Apollo 11 lunar lander using their Orbiter

[@skoomd4447]

​@@oldschoolgenius8069you can't prove it's real

[@timberwolf27]

So hard to get scale, I thought the tiny craters a few feet wide were still hundreds of feet accross till the end....What?

[@lesterinvester167]

Ssssshhh you are not supposed to think out of the fake media box

[@ghostsdefeated4078]

@@lesterinvester167 shut up schyzo

[@nebtheweb8885]

@@lesterinvester167 Ssssshhhhh! It’s better for you to stay quiet and have people think you might be a moron, rather than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

[@atlas8827]

there are craters of all sizes.

[@timberwolf27]

We went to the Moon.

[@Jwingmann]

If you're an amateur radio operator, you can personally ping the repeater off of Apollo 12 Lander. Also, the Soviet Union and China were able to pick up the transmissions directly from the moon, If the landing was a fake The Soviet Union would be more than happy to expose their American rivals.

[@ArKritz84]

Unfortunately, the conspitards aren't radio amateurs, just regular amateurs.

[@archierush868]

@@ArKritz84 Amateurs? You think they have basic skills? Impossible, some of them claim Antartica is fake and say it’s impossible to go there when the only thing you need to do is fill out a short form and you can go. For the UK, it’s literally a single piece of paper, and tourism is a valid reason to why you can go there. You can’t call these guys amateurs when they cant fill out a single form which can be done in less than 5 minutes

[@MattyEngland]

Lies. And as for the USSR, they were run by the same people behind the scenes, the cold war was a psy-op designed to keep both populations living in fear, while at the same time allowing the 13 families who run the world to embezzle hundreds of billions of dollars from both sides.

[@willhogan6712]

You guys, are enemies of free, and autonomous thought. What better are you, for the world?! Attacking an entire group of people..(completely unprovoked, to boot.) For having a different point of view, about something. And if your response is anything like, "it's all backed by science". You're just guilty of scientism.. And have no more of the playing field.. than people who don't think the same way. Which basically reduces you both, to bullies, and trolls. Who, by the way, I was intrigued by, at first.. The radio stuff, I had never heard of before. But I am definitely, a moonlanding skeptic. it's too bad your comments digressed the way they did. It's a shameful way to be a human being, you know..

[@Lensman864]

​@@willhogan6712 Your reply is one of the most ignorant statements I've ever read. "Free and autonomous thought" is uneducated nonsense if not backed by fact and truth and moon landing conspiracists are so determined to stick to their opinion that no amount of fact, truth, explanation, evidence, common sense and EDUCATION will sway their fundamentalist idiocy! 😡

[@tabsntoot]

Looks eerie the New Mexico desert with stanleys grey filter effect.

[@WarriorBlood777]

why did they stop recording at 9:36, but started again after they took off, does anybody know? Is it to save batteries or such?

[@dansv1]

@@nadirmohamed1304 The one with T Patrick Murray as the Interviewer and Tom Mayk as Stanley Kubrick?

[@WarriorBlood777]

Ok and what is it about?

[@dansv1]

@@WarriorBlood777 It’s about Stanley Kubrick confessing to faking the moon landing. It is obviously fake, though, because it was recorded in 2018 long after Stanley Kubrick had died. Kubrick is played, very amateurishly, by an actor named Tom Mayk. He is clearly being fed his lines by film maker T. Patrick Murray for a joke film project called Shooting Stanley Kubrick.

[@rockethead7]

@@nadirmohamed1304 You are clearly quite gullible. You fall for that amateur joke Stanley Kubrick video? And, instead of addressing the fact that Stanley Kubrick wasn't even in the video, it was an actor named Tom Mayk, you just change topics and post another video you fell for? Really?

[@manuelaifrvna]

they looked so happy to be there! little happy hops

[@JetFalcon710]

Yeah, I love how joyous these guys seem when they're hopping around on the Moon! They're adorable tbh

[@brianarbenz1329]

In the 1/6 G gravity, it's much easier to hop than walk.

[@JetFalcon710]

@@brianarbenz1329 True, plus their suits were really stiff and had no clearance for joints, which made walking all but impossible

[@dark_unit2409]

a reminder that the flag only moves when the astronauts are holding it and adjusting it, and if it really was wind wouldn't all that sand be flying like crazy?

[@robinhood6954]

😉

[@Steamedhams7489]

I watched this live, looked even better in the studio.

[@politonno2499]

There was no studio. This was real.

[@tarkan1995]

Scientists then: "Wow, we actually went to the moon and back!" Scientists now: "Ah for Fu** sake, the earth isn't flat!" #SadTimes

[@whatisdoneinthedarkwillbeb9204]

9:59 #leaves on the moon.

[@commentsectioncleaner944]

@@whatisdoneinthedarkwillbeb9204 That's rocks you smooth brain

[@ArjanTV]

No humans went to mokn with that shitty technology lol the only spaceship wich will be able to sent people to moon and mars will be the starship of spacex.. Stop believing this fake story.. It wasnt nasa fault though goverment forced them to lie about this moon landing

[@CommentCritic]

@@ArjanTV the fuck kind of Olympic gold medal getting, world record-setting mental gymnastics has you convinced that only SpaceX will succeed in getting us to Moon and Mars, but NASA has faked the moon landing?

[@toxict3mpz757]

@@CommentCritic ikr like if elon was listing to this dude he'd slap the shit back into his ass and out his throat he'd be that pissed off imagine spending ur whole life as a astronaut and go to the moon witch is an amazing feat of ingenuity

[@Dr.Pepper001]

This was NOT filmed in a studio. It was filmed in my back yard in Atlanta.

[@unhommequicourt]

it s not funny

[@honeysucklecat]

You should set up a hot dog stand, sell tickets, give tours. Could actually be funny.

[@simpleinverso8628]

Damn, you have a big ass backyard!

[@buahhoarms3127]

@@simpleinverso8628 doesnt look that big to me haha look closely

[@wlsnpndrvs8593]

Shut up... I know nothing about that

[@enriquemiranda37]

That feeling of landing on a celestial being just seems so exiting to me for some reason.

[@BillybobJoelikestrains]

the distance would freak me out lol

[@chandruishwar1]

yes, like destroying the mother earth isn't exciting anymore, lets discover some more to satisfy the human ego

[@Gwestytears]

​@@chandruishwar1what?

[@An00bisY00tubis]

I agree, but something that makes me sad is realising that 99% of the time the celestial beings are barren. When considering how empty and lifeless most are, it makes me feel so special and lucky to live on Earth, with its millions of creatures and wonders.

[@bobbobby-o2w]

@@chandruishwar1 What are you doing to help? Recycling plastic?

[@squidelleotious6362]

so can someone please tell me what makes the flag wave like that, its not wind so is it cause by the flag being that it isnt able to move while the one guy holding it is moving the post into place so the rest of the flag is just being wipped around? if that question makes any scenes, like its space holding onto the flag part and the post being held by the dude?

[@rockethead7]

A flag moves EASIER without air to dampen the movement. If the astronaut moves the pole, twists the pole, etc., the flag will move accordingly. A vast majority of the flag movement in this video is because the pole was designed to swivel. But, make no mistake about it, sometimes air IS what's making the flag move. At 8:00 in this video, you have to look closely, but, the flag moves very slightly without being touched as Mitchell walks up to it. The suits were not closed systems. There were purge valves, vents from the porous plate sublimators, etc., which expel spent gasses from time to time. One of the purge valves is right on the front of the suit, facing directly at the flag, and was probably venting gasses as he walked up. With no surrounding air, even the slightest venting will cause a flag to move slightly.

[@malfaro3l]

I try to put myself in he shoes of people watching this live and it sends chills up my spine. Great job. It is still incredible to see humanity at its best. No matter what anybody says or how hard we try to prove otherwise, we really are a damn smart bunch of monkeys!

[@kiae-nirodiariesencore4270]

I watched it live. I was 15 years old. What a time to be alive!

[@gjmncc]

Very true. We sure are assholes, but we sure are smart too.

[@Nekomesha]

Chills up your spine, seriously?

[@hellerart]

Kundalini 😅💫

[@ro_2525]

@@Nekomesha ikr lmao

[@mickyday2008]

Absolutely amazing quality footage. Never seen this before

[@mandrill173]

hoax

[@Sauberes_]

How to say you are scientifically illiterate without saying you are scientifically illiterate@@mandrill173

[@michelmilaneh8963]

​@@mandrill173prove it ret@rd

[@leelunk8235]

FAKE ASF

[@ccramit]

​@mandrill173 You are proof that Crack babies can make it to adulthood. Albeit with a bit of brain damage.

[@Menhikatu005]

I’m always amazed at scales on the moon. Distance is impossible to judge. When they land those craters just look like the large ones but they’re only a foot across!

[@maximpikalev9538]

in Kerbal space program I always orient myself using the shadow of the landing craft, even after a new update introduced the "altitude from the ground" meter that showed your exact distance to the ground and not to sea level. unfortunately for the astronauts, they don't have 3rd-person-view and magic displays that are always correct

[@scottfw7169]

Haynes publishing has a really neat book on the Lunar Rover where that problem is discussed. One component of it is that the less than perfectly clear atmosphere here on Earth give that distance haze effect & and another is the presence of things where we know their general scale, such as trees on distant hills. And there was none of that on the moon.

[@Menhikatu005]

Scott FW It must be a really weird sensation. Clarity everywhere! Even Mars’ thin atmosphere is enough to give it that Earth like hazy distance. I live in the mountains in Japan and the haze is something that makes every morning look different.

[@77SB77]

Thats cuz the moon isnt real is an artificial megastructure made by god to watch over earth... depth of craters isnt adding up to the moon tickness ratio and the moon itself seems to be hollow inside at ceirtan depth

[@MrDaiseymay]

@@maximpikalev9538 exactly----what I thought

[@Markaras]

14:54 Why does it end there? Show me any Apollo footage that also shows the circle of the Moon and the Earth behind.

[@dansv1]

Watch Apollo 8 earthrise footage.

[@Markaras]

@@dansv1 Thanks, but I actually wanted Apollo 11 and after footage, leaving from the surface of the Moon and turn on the camera and show the Earth. Thanks though I have already seen Apollo 8, I am looking for a Moon surface lift off and Earth.

[@adryanclay]

​@@MarkarasYou can find flight journals, full broadcasts, chat logs between the Apollo 11 crew and Houston, you can find hundreds of pictures that they took. Its literally all out there for you, you can do it yourself bro.

[@theeraphatsunthornwit6266]

It would show the table this prop was on😂

[@christopherpardell4418]

As the LM lifts into orbit, its only two windows are facing down. Their orbital altitude is much lower than low earth orbit. Generally, around 70 miles above the surface. ( on earth you can’t orbit that low because of atmospheric drag. But on the moon you just have to clear mountains, really. ). From that altitude, you can not really see the limb of the moon while angled windows down and forward. When they are landing the LM, they start out with their windows facing up, and you can’t see the moon at all, even though they are descending towards it. This video and most others begins just after the pitch over to the more vertical phase of decent,, with the windows facing trajectory forward, towards their landing spot. And, again, the LM windows are angled slightly downwards, because its specifically needs good view of the ground when they are trying to land. Again, so low that they would have to point the camera at the horizon to see any portion of the sky.

[@StarRings]

Wow. How does this not have more views. Good work duder.

[@Alex_1729]

Post it on Reddit in appropriate subreddit, and it'll get exposure

[@couch9416]

Francot12 idiots like you who think it is fake?

[@Francot12]

Couchmann941 idiots like you who thinks this is real

[@StarRings]

@@Francot12 Chill bro sheeeiiittt.

[@rabola55]

People are sick and tired of NASA lies and bullshit. We only want to see it exposed and terminated forever.

[@Aarontakesphotos]

I love how casual this looks when taking the pic, its literally like taking a photo of yourself in front of some landmark when on holiday. i'm surprised he's not putting some thumbs up or pointing at the flag lmao pose man!

[@PanzerkampfwagenausfTschechosl]

Kinda hard to in those suits.

[@terpz47]

@@PanzerkampfwagenausfTschechosl if they can hammer a pole into the ground, they can lift their arm to thumbs up...

[@gabedrinkswater]

@@terpz47 The reason they couldn't hammer it in was because of the surface

[@SincerelyYoursLIVE]

@@gabedrinkswaterthey hammered it pretty well seeing as when they flew off you could see the amount of force was blown onto it and it didnt fall over…

[@gabedrinkswater]

@@SincerelyYoursLIVE it literally fell over

[@julz_swag]

Imagine being there in person… gosh what a feeling… would be hard to grasp.

[@tedcruzforgayrights2045]

I can’t believe they’re not giggling and cheering the whole Time I wouldn’t be professional enough for this at all

[@leelunk8235]

YES IMAGINE, BUT IT WAS A HOAX

[@TripsX]

@@tedcruzforgayrights2045 Why would you need to be professional? Professional for what? You’d assume these people would show more emotion, it’s weird.

[@tedcruzforgayrights2045]

@@TripsX it’s most likely because they’re on a very strict time limit, they have a list of goals to take care of and in brand new territory like this you’d want to stay focused to the mission Anything could happen Also this is just a snippet They spent a whole 21 hours on the moon, which I didn’t know until making this comment, so they probably had their moment at some point

[@weethereal]

​@@TripsXSeriously? You can't see why it would be needed to be professional?

[@ThanosSofroniou]

Hang on a minute, the thing people said that the flag flapping alot indicating wind. Actually its the opposite, because there's no air to resist its momentum when its being swirled back and forth it makes way too aggressive flaps which on earth it wouldn't

[@RFToob]

This is an amazing accomplishment. Great vid. Cheers

[@ZEROTOHERO0100]

I think it'd more expensive to fake this at that time than to actually go there

[@couch9416]

Martin Mitter Yes. The technology to fake it didn't even exist back in the day. It is easier to just go to the actual moon since all the stuff was avaible (the math etc.) and the only challenge was to build the rocket and stuff. (Of course not exactly like this but you know what i mean)

[@kkkiddy]

Ye ye amazing accomplishment

[@lesterinvester167]

So amazing we haven’t been able to achieve it since, and still can’t

[@leftpastsaturn67]

@@lesterinvester167 Have you always been this desperate for attention?

[@KammtailCobra]

lesterinvester We're going back in a few so just sit back and relax

[@VolV8]

9:49 old mate left his esky behind!

[@campbellwright3743]

Yeah, they threw their PLSS (Personal Life Support System) out the hatch of the LM before ascent to save weight.

[@thakurboys5962]

@@campbellwright3743 as moon landing is due on in future wish they retrieve the same and bring it back to earth to check what solar flare effect.

[@arzuozturk6460]

7:26 - 7:31. That is the time light spends getting to earth, registered in the instruments (for listening) and then echoing back on the second timestamp. Either this was flawless attention to detail or this proves their distance.

[@NoGood999]

But when nasa does it in the iss they have literally at times no delay like the time they did a sing along for a class and the delay was literally non existsnt

[@jimoconnorsports5164]

​@@NoGood999speed of light =300 000m/s.....distance to moon 380 000km....distance to ISS=400km.. do the math,learn the pyhsics,understand it...and there you go,no more stupid statements made on the internet,unless your under 12yrs old.

[@sdbadik]

Thank you for upscaling it with AI, makes watching actually interesting. Holy hell it's crazy how many people don't believe it. It's even funnier how some of them complain that the video quality is "too high to be true" xd. Do they even read what are they about to watch?

[@dakunism]

Easiest argument against the non-believers I've ever seen comes from Buzz Aldrin: "If you can disprove the math, you can disprove the landing"

[@JayAlAshmi-ku5ro]

@@dakunism how the f is simulated math any proof for u are u actually retarded or what??

[@igok8357]

Why hasn't this video been shown before?

[@connorluka7149]

@@dakunismmath, hmmmm. 1x1 is ? You see, easy

[@criztu]

52 years have passed since Nasa last alleged "Moon landing" Maybe you'll realize it was faked after 50 more years will go by and Nasa still won't able to "go back to the Moon". Remember, the Artemis program has a declared goal of "going back to the Moon"

[@mrman3938]

Since the first space x launch that I watched live all the way to docking, I haven’t stopped watching space exploration videos. This is fascinating to say the least. I do hope we get to that point where you can buy a ticket and fly to space just like traveling to another country.

[@Suupalex]

Mr Man Too, its really interesting

[@johnnycripplestar5167]

That last part is very cool, but sadly that'd be like a thing during the age of being a type 2 civilisation with multiple stars to travel across.

[@TheSpaceEngineer]

@m even if he had accepted that, it likely would have never happened anyways. considering we have only had one singular private mission to low earth orbit in that style, that happening in the 70s is a pipedream. the majority of spaceflight startups die within a year or two. SpaceX was a good example of how close and fast bankruptcy comes.

[@thisyhis7698]

commercial space travel will be sick.

[@brucebruhn8837]

Must be 300degrees, imagine the temperatures

[@kelvyquayo]

This is Commander Alan Shepard (first American in space!) and Lunar Module Pilot Edgar Mitchell with Command Module Pilot Stuart Roosa orbiting somewhere up there. This is the mission where they 'played golf' on The Moon. hehe

[@thesuperintendent4290]

The video of the astronaut is hilarious as he swings and he just keeps swinging unable to slow down going because he is not used to a lower gravity. environment.

[@BurnedLeo]

The cameraman was already there to welcome the crew 😂😂

[@rockethead7]

Not the brightest bulb, eh?

[@jameskirk2579]

poor parents......

[@civiliglen]

Lunar orbit approaching 4,000mph not 40,000mph mentioned at 12:30.

[@suekennedy8917]

The did a such a great job landing on the fake moon they did not take a video of the inside of the LEM during descent!

[@rherbert57]

@@suekennedy8917 Go back to your cave.

[@_K3PLR]

@@suekennedy8917 why would they need to? What difference would it make if they did?

[@valentinotera3244]

@@rherbert57 Don't waste your time. It's two solid years he keep regurgiting the same dumb question over and over again.lmfao

[@nebtheweb8885]

@@suekennedy8917 Stop being an idiot. The camera was mounted to the window as you can see here in this photo. All they had to do when they descended and launched from the moon is turn on. images.app.goo.gl/sbCqJZBuYqbAsutH6

[@jackbond8237]

Wow how amazing.. I was born in 1977 and am blown away every time I see this

[@randallolson7630]

I was just about to graduate high school when this happened. I followed the space program from early 60's on. Thought I wanted to be an astronaut. Didn't know I would have never qualified, since you couldn't be more than 5' 10" to apply :)

[@maeguk1]

Poor Jim Lovell could not land on the Moon. Imagine you are so close that you see your landing site but since the ship is damaged the only thing you can do is to try to get home rather. Edit: thanks for the comments guys, I am a man of science myself, also I'm well educated about the space exploration and the Apollo missions in particular.

[@nebtheweb8885]

At least he is one of only 3 astronauts that got to visit the moon twice.

[@skippywinters]

Better to be in your ship wishing you were on the moon than being on the moon wishing you were in a ship

[@overlord7512]

How i felt when i got a flat tyre with no spare on my drive to blackpool from glasgow.. was a hard day.

[@srinitaaigaura]

Well fortunately they made it back safely. That was almost unsurvivable.

[@chucklesdaklown5777]

I'm with you! I wish he would have made it !!!

[@Mr.RandomContent]

Can’t wait for the Artemis 3 mission in 2025. Luckily we are seeing the Artemis 2 mission this year in 2024.

[@archierush868]

Artemis 2 is delayed to Sept 2025 and 3 2026/7.

[@adryanclay]

​@@archierush868womp womp. And i thought we would get to the moon before GTA 6 😂

[@archierush868]

@@adryanclaywell, we’ll still get both eventually.

[@adryanclay]

@@archierush868 fr

[@DS-lk3tx]

The Artemis is doing nothing but launching DEI into low orbit. 😂😂

[@TacShooter]

They say that Stanley Kubrick faked the moon landing, but was such a perfectionist that he demanded they film On Location.

[@PatrickLensch]

Poor him, still shaking. Lies are not good to karma, even if you are forced or driven. I give him some heart, because he (may) overcome his wow-ego, in the way, he put some ridiculously in the story and in his work. He put a seed of truth in any story, that is why we can call him genious. Maybe, a Hero, if the seed will grow. But this ist still a question.

[@UteChewb]

@@PatrickLensch , mate, get help. Seriously.

[@PatrickLensch]

@@UteChewb a lie is a lie, no help will change that 🥱

[@Icemanin1994]

Patrick Lensch, but when it’s not a lie, it’s not a lie.

[@PatrickLensch]

@@Icemanin1994 is that true? 'No lie is no lie'. I do not like to handle with lies ... 😅 but: truth is truth 🙏

[@JustSpeakingFacts_]

Imagine just standing there, in the moment ON THE MOON looking back at earth. Knowing your the only human and will be for a very long time to experience that.

[@tommycoopersmagiccarpetwea817]

Then getting a really bad itch on your nose.😨

[@johnp139]

And realizing that you don’t know the difference between your and you’re.

[@JustSpeakingFacts_]

@@johnp139 it’s a KZbin comment. Not a college paper. If I wanna half ass type something I can and will. Go unalive youself

[@Seieiemon]

The other 11 astronaunts:🗿

[@JRock4572001]

This is awesome!!! One of the greatest achievement in human history.

[@tehflooper]

One of the greatest hoax in human history*

[@kinderfett5259]

@@tehflooper you are one of the dumbest people of human history*

[@tehflooper]

@@kinderfett5259 "luk at me, im intelligent, you dumb, nasa nasa, usa usa".

[@kinderfett5259]

@@tehflooper ?

[@kinderfett5259]

anyways, ohh my check from NASA finally came.

[@Codename47_]

Which Hollywood studio is this ?

[@pboffic]

It is called the "State" Actually, I think it's Hollywood.

[@Tim22222]

ha ha 🙄

[@cliff9887]

It’s real dumb idiot

[@Something_From_Outer_Space]

Sea of Tranquility, on the Moon

[@ceedee873]

Kubrick's basement

[@widget3672]

"5% fuel left, you're doing good." Apollo program astronauts had bigger balls than most anyone else in aerospace. Not saying modern stuff isn't impressive but I somehow doubt there'll be more manually operated powered descents.

[@fernosan]

Good thing my wife isn't an astronaut. When the reserve fuel light blinks, she dreads the car will stop any minute, despite me being cool and saying it would run for 70km.

[@aravindhsm1287]

The descent was manual not because the computers were not capable of it but because the astronauts wanted to do it.

[@widget3672]

@@aravindhsm1287 nonetheless, I can't think of anyone alive that would willingly go "nah, I go this" over a braking burn and landing from (lunar) orbital velocities.

[@widget3672]

@@maxsmith695 evidence? It's been a short while since I debated lunar landing deniers. I wonder if you have any new evidence or if you're all still barking up the wrong tree?

[@aravindhsm1287]

@@widget3672 they are heroes for sure but what I wanted to convey was that while the world kept praising the pilots,the brilliant minds behind the computers are often not credited.

[@TheOldGord]

An amazing feat given the technology of the day. Some brilliant engineering.

[@juniorsir9521]

They had reliable communication with the module lander. It really was a feat. Lots of math involved. Apollo 13 was the only mission I think that didn’t land on the moon.

[@juniorsir9521]

@@cwstewartjr1973 where do you think we get radio waves and microwaves and heat waves from? The air around us. Even then communication existed even in the early 1900s. So if your phone loses signal take it with your phone company. They should have towers around your area. You’re paying them to provide a service without interruption.

[@cozz124]

thinking about where we would be right now and how big nasa's budget would be if the soviets hadn't gone bankrupt makes me drool

[@bernardcohen3245]

I’m sorry but this shit never gets old not then, not now 51 yrs later and probably not in a 100 yrs from now .

[@anatoli28]

Fake

[@timbuckthe2nd642]

I expected more from a Cohen to understand deception. Smh

[@drugaddictedmouse8749]

@@anatoli28 Your brain is fake.

[@cwstewartjr1973]

Its amazing what Hollywood was capable of doing even back then

[@ericvanbree7688]

Je älter desto moderner.

[@Sofie72]

at 04:38 down right in the image. Popping quickly in and out again, What's that?

[@мистерМакс-ю3к]

Это радиация

[@anunusualnick8340]

I know the moon is pretty small. But why does it look like the horizon is like 100 meters away?

[@archierush868]

How are you somehow able to tell it’s 100m away without any visual reference through a 2d screen?

[@ago9907]

The Horizon Is like 2,3km away buy without reference like mountains or hills it's hard to visualize it

[@ВячеславМихайлов-м8з]

Киностудия заканчивается

[@ProfessorStephon]

​@@ВячеславМихайлов-м8з😂

[@dylanmorgan6956]

Our perception of distance here on earth has a lot to do with our atmosphere. We have a lot of haze here on earth that gives distant objects that far away appearance. The moon has no atmosphere, which means there is no haze to distort distant objects, thus making the horizon very clear and seemingly very close. It was common for these astronauts to having difficulty with depth and distance perception because of this. Basically, not atmosphere = no atmospheric distortion = incredibly clear and undistorted views of the horizon.

[@sqdfghjhgfd8694]

What's that pointy white thingy casting a shadow bottom left at 2:09 ? Genuinely curious

[@gesmoyer]

Rocks, you can see plenty of them in the descent.

[@downey2294]

could be a meteorite or a rock.

[@aabd7023]

It’s an alien insect

[@nebtheweb8885]

It is just one of many rocks around where they landed. During the decent, you could see more than a few of them casting long shadows. The reason they cast long shadows is because ALL of the moon landings were slated to occur during what they called "Lunar Dawn", because there was no way they were going to land during what we see here on earth as a Full Moon do avoid the hottest part of the lunar day. They were close to but not at the shadow boundary or the shadow terminator line.

[@sqdfghjhgfd8694]

@@nebtheweb8885I didn't knew the landings occured at lunar dawn ! Awesome thanks for sharing some knowledge and awnsering my question !!

[@slaphappyduplenty2436]

Wonderful. Wonderful, wonderful, wonderful.

[@mydogbrian4814]

- Lorence Welk's favorite phrase.

[@renarsyoyo]

wow, the quality is sooo goood!

[@rockethead7]

A vast majority of Apollo video was simply by using a low-res TV camera. But, yes, they did bring a 16mm film camera. It couldn't take much film, and it took time to change rolls, so, they didn't use it super often. But, yes, now and then, they used actual film rather than a low-res TV signal.

[@maxmccann5323]

How crazy is it though we actually went to the freaking moon. After tens of thousands of years of evolution we actually got on top of a giant ass bomb and hopped onto another world. Never gets old

[@flat-earther]

No hope for you believing it that cr*p

[@maxmccann5323]

@@flat-earther hahahaha you actually censored crap? what are you bro like 12? Get back to school kiddo and read a book

[@honeysucklecat]

One of my favorite parts of Kubrick’s 2001 is the scene where they do a group photo shot next to the monolith, and the photographer waves them to move closer together.

[@jordanjoestar-turniptruck]

My ears hurt just thinking about that scene

[@Godscountry2732]

Me too. "but considering how good the interior space station was, Mr.Kubrick didn't put a lot of effort and thought into replicating the lunar surface scenes, but overall, it was a great film.

[@MrDaiseymay]

@@Godscountry2732 The only 'Space Film' worth watching

[@gabedrinkswater]

@@MrDaiseymay You seem like a sad person

[@dewayneblue1834]

Apollo 14, the last Moon landing where the astronauts had to 'rough it'; subsequent missions (Apollo 15, 16 and 17) had Lunar Roving Vehicles along so that the astronauts could drive around the Moon in style.

[@mydogbrian4814]

- Wasn't one of the vehicles the Oscar Myers Orange Weaner Mobile?

[@mydogbrian4814]

- Didnt they have a nitro-methan fuelled dragster planned for #18 to keep viewers interested before Congress said enough already we proved we could go to the moon 9 times already & landed 6 times!!!. (And in the future we will still have "wacko's" in 2020 that will think it never really happened). Better to spend the money on Vietnam!

[@user-we1rp4ju8i]

7:50 right side of screen, what is that light source?

[@archierush868]

If you’re talking about the reflective thing above the astronaut, its an antenna. It’s sometimes visible in some footage but not all the time. If not and your wondering what’s lighting the area: the sun.

[@user-we1rp4ju8i]

@@archierush868not talking about antenna, the right side of screen is dark before 7:50 then lights up as if another light source is added then darkens again, that is NOT the sun

[@archierush868]

⁠@@user-we1rp4ju8iit’s the reflective glow of the astronauts suit as he just walks into frame from the sun. The same glow can be seen as the other astronaut walks out of frame If theres multiple light sources, then there would be multiple shadows. Theres only ever one shadow visible

[@Spiranic89]

Amazing, this happened before i was born. I hope i can watch another moonlanding live, i will be just inches away from the tv screen i can assure you.😊

[@JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke]

I was in High School / Jr. High during the apollo missions and yes... it was and is still exciting to me. Can't wait for the Artemis missions... Ad Astra!

[@Theskyhorse]

you guys been fooled big time@@JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke

[@spacebears5006]

Look at how they fake it before ;)

[@johntidwell9239]

​@@spacebears5006look at how you can't prove it hahahaha

[@johntidwell9239]

​@@spacebears5006I can say 2+2 is 5. But it isn't

[@conanichigawa]

Man, the quality of this footage is awesome.

[@mandrill173]

didnt happen

[@ratz555]

@@mandrill173proof that it didnt happen?

[@shellbacksclub]

When something is so unbelievable like this, ppl sadly resort to unbelieving it.

[@farel6406]

I agree, this thing is majestic

[@DemonDrummer]

Yep. The masses of ignorant people in the world including Moon landing denying cultist, flat earthers, and other fringe conspiracy theorists: ​A group of people who very likely suffer from an array of psychological issues; chief among which is Identity-Protective Cognition. There are certain markers that preclude those who fall for cult’s schemes and tactics for example. These markers overlap when dealing with conspiracy theorists and those that deny facts due to their feelings. Often times it deals with not feeling special or chronic low self esteem/insecurities mixed with deep-seated trust issues, likely brought on by trauma, and an insatiable need to feel important; what would make someone feel more important than thinking they know better than most of the people on Earth and all of the scientific community. It’s a desperate ploy and vicious cycle of needing to feel important and a sense they belong.

[@trendynow1369]

​@@DemonDrummerprojecting much?

[@DemonDrummer]

@@trendynow1369 Nope, but way to ironically/hypocritically project in your comment accusing me of doing just that. Remember, you’re the one that believes unfounded nonsense and unproven speculative subjective conjecture based on nothing but ignorance, feelings, and fallacious logic. Let that sink in. 🤗 Do better, learn.

[@trendynow1369]

@@DemonDrummer Here's how to prove this was fake: 1. Change your video to .25 speed, the slowest speed on the KZbin settings. 2. Go to the part where they take off, start about 9:57. 3. Watch the footprints closely as they withstand what makes the flag violently move.

[@maotemplar]

Can someone explain how they put the car inside that small ship and how they pull it out? Is there any footage of that? Thanks

[@rockethead7]

They didn't. This is Apollo 14 (no rover). But, they had one on Apollo 15, and the footage of them deploying it is readily available.

[@r0cketplumber]

During the ascent you can see the RCS maneuvering back and forth across the deadband for the closed loop guidance. Making the ascent engine fixed and using the RCS for TVC saved a lot of mass. The RCS is used all the way to orbit to steer the main ascent engine, so your comment at 13:29 that it's not needed is actually not correct.

[@kristianschneider9398]

Is that why it slightly "wobbles" as the module ascents?

[@r0cketplumber]

@@kristianschneider9398 Yes, that's it.

[@donnebes9421]

Rocketplumber only a rocketplumber would know those details.

[@Stepclimb]

Pretty sure the required velocity for lunar orbit is quite a bit less than “40,000 mph”. Interesting commentary from the Brits.

[@JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke]

@@Stepclimb I noticed that too

[@andrewangerer1399]

Great work mate. I love everything about the Apollo program

[@ancelrick5396]

www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/

[@andrewangerer1399]

@@ancelrick5396 wow, this is great. Thanks

[@ancelrick5396]

@@andrewangerer1399 I enjoyed it when I stumbled onto it. They seem to be the complete film rolls, crappy pictures and all

[@RayRay-zt7bj]

@@ancelrick5396 Wow! Great page Ancel Rick! There is like every photo in Apollo history there!

[@RayRay-zt7bj]

At age 9, going on 10, it was a magical time to be alive and seeing the first Moon Launch and Landing live on TV. It seemed like an eternity while watching all the prior test Launches from the fatal tragedy of Apollo 1 on through to the Lunar Orbiter to Apollo 11's landing. Then it became a routine mission in a short span of 3 years and 5 months from 11 to 17, with the miracle of Apollo 13 in between. The Space program was bever as exciting since, with the exception of several of the Mars Rover landings.

[@areamusicale]

Terrible audio! Where the hell were they transmitting from? The Moon? oh, yeah. My bad.

[@phelype211]

just special effects to help to fake...

[@areamusicale]

@@phelype211 true, we live in a simulation.

[@Taufik8701]

@@areamusicale simulation theory - MUSE 🤩

[@JerryP7a]

@@phelype211 smh flat earther

[@koskelii]

@Jerry’s Channel I think he’s joking, you can’t be that dumb

[@ConnorRonnoc-z8e]

There looks like a Tower in the distance, is that the Directors platform?

[@rockethead7]

Solar wind collector. It's closer than you think. It's 4 or 5 feet tall. Basically a roll of foil stretched out and hung from a pole.

[@papai-y3i]

​@@rockethead7'solar wind collector' lol. sure buddy, there there.

[@sachal2053]

@@papai-y3i tu es un abruti

[@Jimmysage3273]

The Apollo guys are always hilarious in their transitions lol it’s amazing how they react in such a situation

[@pilotofgames8979]

NASA thinks that ability is so important in astronaut job. You should be making fun of something in hard situations to help crew feel better.

[@PanzerkampfwagenausfTschechosl]

@@pilotofgames8979 what?

[@MrDaiseymay]

@@pilotofgames8979 Then playing Golf---taking a trip around the moon in my Buggy---well, it is Hollywood, make 'em laff make 'em laff. Always remember the Viewig figures and the AD-Men.

[@cdubs9918]

I miss this. I miss when we were proud of our scientists and engineers. We attempted the unthinkable and actually did it. God, I really miss that.

[@marcominelli2578]

Quale Dio?😂 l'Uomo, semmai.......

[@auraevoe2036]

Hello? You aren't proud of things like the James Webb telescope for example?

[@morgandude2]

I'm afraid the internet has brought World wide insanity as a by-product.

[@mandrill173]

hoax

[@Nicksonian]

@@mandrill173…is a fool

[@cinquecento1985]

Imagine standing on the moon, and the only thing between you and the vastness of the universe is your spacesuit.

[@cmay878]

2:10, bottom left. Is that a boulder? I think the call out was at 550 feet at that point.

[@BlGGESTBROTHER]

The footage is extremely zoomed. You'll notice the craters looked huge as they were descending but then when you see them outside of the landing craft they are actually tiny.

[@fabriziomendoza2524]

9:53 when I'm finally by myself and the fart i've been holding since the class started blasts trough my pants.

[@d3vitron779]

Some things just shouldn’t be said

[@cursedcliff7562]

How much DeltaV does your ass have?

[@d3vitron779]

Djordje Oljaca About 3.5km/s

[@MS-qm3ml]

lmaoooooo

[@artyzinn7725]

Amazing quality, I saw this live as a child back then and it was NEVER this clear! Or it could be bad memory of a 4 year old.

[@atlas8827]

what you saw came from the TV cameras. This footage was shot on film, that's why it looks so good.

[@daviddredge1178]

You never saw the landing live on TV. Ever.

[@gingergino_1569]

@@daviddredge1178 shut the fuck up please, we enjoy watching this.. don’t ruin it.

[@daviddredge1178]

@@gingergino_1569 You must have read all the wacky comments on here but you pick on mine? Why? Because its true?

[@gingergino_1569]

@@daviddredge1178 you were the first one i saw🤡

[@godr0z31]

why is the ground so dark towards the cameras? The sun choose to only shine on placing the flag that day?

[@archierush868]

The reflective suits slightly messes with the camera’s picture because there are soo reflective. 5:37, you can clearly see that the ground close to the camera is as bright as the land at the horizon.

[@Clark-w7s]

Oh that was the way the spotlight on the studio roof was pointed.

[@TheDeepblue62]

Auch nach 50 Jahren immer noch beeindruckend und faszinierend! Tolle Aufnahmen.

[@TheDaexiled1]

This is such a fantastic video. My parents were alive to see this actually happening on their T.V.s. Despite seeing the Challenger explode and Columbia peeling apart on re-entry I still wanna go to space one day orbital or suborbital

[@fredgarv79]

I was 8 at the time, and I remember a very blurry black and white image of neil armstrong setting foot on the moon. it's one of those moments that you always remember where you were. the first image from the surface of Mars in 76 came down. of course the challenger explosion, 9/11, the eruption of mt st helens woke me up out of my bed hundreds of miles away, it was so loud I thought it might be a nuclear bomb, the watergate hearings that summer of 73, jimmy carters surprise defeat in the 1980 election to ronald regan. the fall of the berlin wall, the night that trump won, etc etc

[@fredgarv79]

@Andre you must have just finished watching the breathless 1 year anniversary of jan 6th, on msnbc cnn, abc, nbc, cbs, pbs bbc the new york times, the wash post. yes, JUST like 9/11, pearl harbor, of course. 9/11, 3,000 people killed, pearl habor the beginning of world war two with japan and 2,000 more dead. jan 6th? one person died, and she was shot by a capital police guy, two others that died were from heart attacks or one guy died a day later from a stroke. fabricated news stories about how they "insurrectionists" tried to beat to death a police officer with a fire extinguisher. Ok, now's the part where you accuse me of only watching fox news. for me, the reason why I remembered where I was on the night trump got elected, was not because I particularly liked trump, I did not and did not vote for him and I still find him a bit of a fool, what I found so memorable, was the utter shock from these networks that trump won. I found it highly entertaining how shocked and stunned they were. how could t his possibly happen? they were so depressed, so upset. hillary was so upset she couldn't bear to even address her followers. it was a glorious thing to watch

[@fredgarv79]

@Andre "more recently, there have been differing reports that he was injured by a fire extinguisher and that he did not suffer any blunt force injuries. His own MOTHER said she believed he died from a stroke the next day, not from a fatal blow to the head. "New ruling of his death has been officially attributed to strokes, prompting "reevalution" of initial coverage" (By all the above media outlets) "commenting on a time article "One would never know from reading this (the first reports that he had been hit in the head with a fire ext, or, even BEATEN TO DEATH with it. Brutally beaten to death! had a big gash on his head! ) that's what was first reported. "That false account was widely quoted in yet another media fiasco"

[@fredgarv79]

@Andre uhh, all I did was say because you compared trump winning an election to 3,000 people murdered, killed, on 9/11.I just thought you were the type that would just relish that jan 6th 1 year anniversary of that riot that they play on a loop on all those networks. you compared trump winning an election to 9/11, then your fearless progressive leaders went on and compared jan 6th to 9/11 also. so I thought you had good company there. get some help for your TDS although I'm not so sure there is a cure because you guys are just too far gone.

[@fredgarv79]

@Andre uhh, your the one that responded first with something that had nothing to do with the topic.you compared trump winning an election to 9/11. so I responded to that insanity. then you say keep on the topic. and anything I say you say is "nonsense" "gibberish" "out of context" etc. look it up for yourself that is if google searches would ever have anything from something other than the NY times, the wash post, the la times, msnbc, etc. how can you just called "nonsense" that his own mother said he died from a stroke. this is out there, this is proven. the media jumped on the whole bashing his head in with a fire extinguisher with ZERO evidence. I didn't give any context or sources because that would make for an overly long post. for proof, is msnbc, or the various democrats on the senate hearings now claiming that this guy was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher? no, because its simply not true. but it was widely reported right after the jan 6th riot. because the left wing news outlets wanted it to look as bad as they possibly could, so they just went with it without knowing what actually happened. fact, the media said he was "beaten to death" by a raging rioter with a fire extinguisher. fact, he died the next day from a stroke. he had no, nothing nada zero wounds on his head or anywhere.those are the facts. they wanted to promote the image of this poor cop being beaten to death with a blunt object by trump supporters, in order to further their agenda. not one rioter who got inside was armed, not one. people on the left always say to cops, why couldn't you just use a taser? why did you have to shoot the poor person? or just shoot them in the leg, etc. but this cop just shot her dead for climbing through a door. she was no threat to anybody. she was a mom, a military vet who served in the gulf war. she most certainly did not "deserve" to be shot dead.

[@Gym268-j8e]

The way the dust hits the ground, the way they move, like damn they are actually on the moon

[@Calebmiracle]

@@Koolitari how did you know give me prove

[@Fwaygo664]

@@Koolitari no it’s not fake with knowledge of space and if your too into space it’s not fake at all I know many people are skeptical about these stuff cuz well they weren’t there to see it

[@Dqriashua]

@@Koolitariit's official footage from NASA, so no, it isn't fake.

[@ldope3904]

@@Dqriashua Lol. The institution founded by a group of ACTUAL Nazi's brough from Germany after WWII... I mean I believe the footage is real, but it being from NASA doesn't mean shit tbh.

[@oldironsides4107]

@Astro24451 Remember when the USA gave Netherlands a moon rock in the &0s? And 20 years later it turned out it was just a piece of petrified wood.? You think they got the petrified wood from the moon?

[@stiepanholkien605]

Best restoration of moon footage I've seen.

[@reset-xs9ql]

I'd like to believe this incredible accomplishment as much as anybody else but ... who got out of the lunar module and assembled the lighting rig pictured in the left part of shot at 4:45 to illuminate the "eagle" sitting on the moon's surface? it has a bright light, tripod stand, light directing umbrella & wires leading thru the dust to the right out of shot where it's presumably energized. the only source of electricity would be the lunar module itself right? so, the guy descending ladder at 5:30 isn't the first man out bc someone (if this were real, true, reliable video footage) has to erect a lighting rig and camera before johnny 7 makes his big entrance. also, the "flag pole" is already installed in "this" video at 5:30 beyond the lunar module's shadow, reflecting light off it. besides all that, we're generally expected to naively swallow this aluminum foil/curtain rod tree fort, controlled with microwave technology, then blasts off to re-dock with the stationary/orbiting "space craft" that the men are inside when they "splash down" in the Indian ocean two days later? how the phuck did they do that? how do you even practice that zero gravity maneuver? curious, there is no footage of the separating of/or re-docking of that module and the eagle/lunar module isn't it? non sense. if they did this feat why did they not continue during the 70's, 80's, 90's, new century with more modern tech? nasa says they lost the tech that had and used in the late 60's. that's absurd. saying nothing would've been a more respectable decision. nasa's version of 'my dog ate it'.

[@archierush868]

4:45 was the second EVA. They got out first, placed the experiments, got back inside to rest and refill the PLSS, then went out a second time. This is the second time. The light is the sun. After the astronaut adjusts the aperture of the camera, you can also very clearly see that it’s a satellite dish and not an umbrella. The shadow is also nearly completely transparent so that’s a really bad umbrella. How did they take off from the moon, redock with the CSM in orbit travelling around 4,000mph, transfer the crew, experiments and rock samples, undock and then return home? With great difficulty and with previous missions like Apollo 10 which was a rehearsal for Apollo 11 where the were around 9 miles from the surface of the moon before being forced to return to the CSM as well as missions going around the moon unmanned, manned, and probes. There is footage of the docking and undocking of the LM to the CSM. They didn’t continue because of funding cuts. America had almost everything focused on Apollo during that time which is why they went from first manned flight in 1962 to footprints on the moon in 1969. An example of something similar to this happening would be the development of the British Dreadnought battleships which when they were first made, took just over a year to make when today, it takes several years. This was because it was a national priority, just like Apollo. They never lost the tech, just the means to make them because of, yet again, funding as well as a new program called the shuttle which had nothing in common with the Saturn-V. NASA always wanted to go back, they just couldn’t because they didn’t have the funds

[@SelwynRewes]

@reset-xs9ql are you a copy and paste troll or a genuinely stupid person... ?

[@gives_bad_advice]

This is not the Eagle. This is A14. And the light is the sun. And why do you want to see video of the docking manuver? You'll just reject it as fake, right? At any rate, there is indeed video of the docking, which you can find in about 10 seconds here in You Tube. 4:45

[@derpanator5671]

one did get out first lol. hes recording the other astronaut getting out. you can see the swaying of his hand as he holds the handheld camera. they didn't continue becuase the soviets didn't continue. where do you even see the flag? you can call it an aluminium tree fort but the fact of the matter is you refuse to believe its real becuase you choose to see certain things and disregard others

[@MetalMonkeGT]

It was pretty funny reading this, although this I probably a rage bait I will reply anyways, there is no tripod light stand. It's just the sun with no atmosphere to differentiate it. We get to see a guy going down the module ladder because another guy before him got out of the module and set up the camera to record. Also, although it looks like a giant piece of trash wrapped in "tin foil", it's actually just a special type of heat insulation called "Kapton Foil". They didn't continue to do these programs because there was no more need to explore and fund lunar missions. It mattered a ton that the USA had to outdo the Soviet Union in their space race. Since we had gotten to the moon and there wasn't too much to learn from there we didn't need to keep exploring.