Dynamic Entities Beyond Spacetime | Conscious Portals - Dr. Don Hoffman, UC Irvine, DSPod

[@DemystifySci_Podcast]

Listen on the go at all podcast locations: anchor.fm/demystifysci DEMYSTICON 2024, Austin TX 4/7-8 2024: www.eventbrite.com/e/demysticon-2024-tickets-727054969987 Material solutions to quantum spookiness: www.youtube.com/@MaterialAtomics Short films @DemystifySciInvestigates: kzbin.info/door/UfzVdgNu2xLThgM2qQZmSQ

[@sandro9uerra]

The revolution is right in our faces, it even has experimental support. I've shared with you guys many times. Do you really want to see it? It's simple Q=MC^2 here is why: thermodynamicfields.wordpress.com/2021/09/26/example-post-3/

[@TimCollins-gv8vx]

Hofs view is refreshing.. Im glad as a scientist hes not banging his head against the proverbial brick wall anymore. I think hes on the right track. Together science and spirituality has a better chance of scratching the surface of understanding of the big questions than science alone.

[@tinfoilhatscholar]

Isn't it just funny, that it is the standard world view of mystics and people who live in close communion with the Earth, that consciousness is primary. That consciousness is omnipotent and makes up the fabric of the universe, and that we do in fact have extrasensory organs of perception that can feel the fabric. (Michael Levin often suggests that we do not have such extrasensory capacities) (Federico Faggin eloquently elaborates upon the mystical experience of awakening to the fabric of consciousness) And... The standard world view of empericists, is that consciousness must not exist outside of the mental realm. It sure is reminiscent of the story of small self to big Self, and of rhe journey of "know thyself". It is merely a property of the small self to imagine self as primary... I just finished Hegel's 'phenomenology of mind' this morning, and i think this is exactly what he was talking about, lol Excellent discussion. Love it

[@rareartists]

Don Hoffman is easily the most important Conscious Agent affiliated with the academy / Science. Thanks & Praise ✨

[@AzonariMedia]

This was a fantastic interview. I always love Dr. Hoffman speak, and your interaction with him brought out the best. I learned a lot, even though I have read his book and watched several other interviews. But also I loved the end, the emotional and philosophical aspects of his work.

[@MOAON_AABE]

Donald Hoffman is my hero, he is a pioneer who follows the evidence!!!

[@stephenpalmer-zh9dq]

if every person that has ever lived and will- would shuffle the 52 card deck of cards different arrangements every time that is an astounding number

[@rettmcbride8591]

This is comedic genius! The host never break character, which is absolute genius. Shilo, (and of course his characters name is Shilo), sips coffee from time to time and it just kills me every time lol. They absolutely nail the new age, coffee shop camping super couple. This is comedy trolling on a completely different level! I know Shilo is wearing a wig but honestly I can’t tell, lol! Genius!!!!!

[@DemystifySci_Podcast]

LOL it's actually real hair but i get that a lot. arrow root powder bro

[@rettmcbride8591]

@@DemystifySci_Podcast love it! Rock it and enjoy it!

[@CrazyDaisy6971]

i was wonderin about the hair too. like a mad scientist or somethin. kudos

[@ALavin-en1kr]

There is an effort to ground it in science and mathematics as anything recounted only as experience is often dismissed, as if experience were not real or valid. Experience may not be false but what is seen or observed may be,, or actually is false.

[@ALavin-en1kr]

I would disagree. It is not about knowing, it is about sharing. Consciousness sharing what it is and has with entities who can also know and experience what is conscious experience. That is what is so wonderful about it that we little entities get to share in this immense and wonderful experience that is consciousness.

[@adrian.bastin969]

Carl Jung was trying to construct/find a principle for the acausal events which seemed to be nodes in an otherwise invisible network - these nodes being 'meaningful' coincidences. He came a cross too many of these coincidences in the lives, and in his treatment, of his patients to be pure chance. These events were integral to the psychic development, and sometimes the cure, of his patients. This led him to study deeply the works of the 17th century alchemists in which he found a parallel with the development of the self and of the 'individuation' process he observed in his patients, when brought into conscious expression. In fact, he was looking for a shaping principal outside of time space.

[@davehowes5162]

Professor Hoffman is on my reading and viewing list next to Alan Watts. Both are transformational.

[@stephenpalmer-zh9dq]

never get tired of listening to either one

[@khellstr]

I'm picking blueberries in forest and listening this. Modern times ❤

[@cukoobajube]

It's all in the mind!

[@Braun09tv]

All dreams, more or less complex. But nothing else but dreams in existence. Reality is just another term for: most complex known dream.

[@adrian.bastin969]

RemystifySci ? Sorry - couldn't resist that. Love your presentations, when I can understand them.

[@deepblack67]

The MEDIUM is the MESSAGE.

[@cukoobajube]

When they speak of a.i. consciousness do they really mean a.i. self-consciousness? Also it begs the question "conscious of what?" I'm wondering if a.i. self consciousness may require the construct of something similar to an "ego"?

[@randalmoore4704]

I find I need to dummy down practically everything talked about in this interview, but I am making headway. (but I don't really KNOW that I'm making headway) Can I say the amplituhedron is a geometric object that can have a kajilion dimensions and compare it to the three dimensional monolith in 2001 a space odyssey? I'm trying to think if I read this analogy somewhere--or did I hear it in this interview? My brain is a bit wasted over this since I watched it all late last night. But I'm still having fun ! A/W The monkeys on 2001 wonder WTF is this thing? But then a lot of shit happens and suddenly in the movie humans are in outer-space. (Ok--not a great analogy) I'd be happy just walking away from this interview by simply learning that pigeons have 4 color receptors while humans just have 3. But Dr. Hoffman is kinda fun at times using terms like "mystical shishtical". I like him. There are a lot of religions to choose from telling us who we are--but it's also fun stepping out a bit further and accepting that who I am is NOT an object in space-time. Am I? Does space time exist at all? Just an interface? Yes--and I know how frustrating it is stepping on my noise canceling headset and breaking it. (it never fully cancelled noise a/w) I am not really wanting answers to my dumb questions. But I honestly got the gist of what's being discussed here and it is indeed fascinating. I just don't know where to go from here. (think I'll binge Netflix the rest of the day, or maybe take a long nap) Actually I'm going back to the first interview you had with Hoffman.

[@mitsuracer87]

I have a hard time with the exact meaning of some of Hoffmans terms as well but i think you'd enjoy Bernardo Kastrup's recent interview with THIRD EYE DROPS, titled something like Carl Jung, Archetypes, synchronicity and UFOs

[@tjssailor4473]

We often hear of the hard problem of consciousness. Why is there qualia or experience of anything in the first place? I would submit there is an even harder and more important question - why do I seem to be a specific individual experiencing a specific subset of qualia? This is the most important question that must be asked and answered but rarely is. As a matter of fact there seems to be a huge blind spot when it comes to this in discussions of consciousness. If material reductionism is to be relevant to the big questions, then it has to explain not how brains generate consciousness but how the specific brain in my head could create the specific consciousness I seem to be looking out of the eyeballs of this specific body. Why do I PERSONNALLY EXIST as an individual in the first place? Out of the infinite matter in the universe how is it that only the three pounds in my head could create me? What is different about that three pounds for this to occur? Consider that billions of bodies showed up before this one. Billions showed up after this one. None of them seem to have created my existence. This body could be running around without it being ME just like these billions of others All bodies are made of the same elements. All brains have the same basic anatomy. If all brains are basically the same and are creating consciousness then there should only be ONE consciousness looking out of every set of eyeballs simultaneously. A hopelessly superimposed existence from every possible viewpoint at once. I’m sure that materialists would claim that no, no, brains are so complex they are all different. Ok, so what would have to be recreated in another brain for me to exist looking out of another set of eyeballs? When the ontologies purporting to explain consciousness are examined critically it becomes obvious that all materialist/reductionist strategies fail completely in attempting to address the individuality question. What is the principled explanation for why: A brain over here would generate my specific consciousness and a brain over there would generate your specific consciousness? Integrated information over here would generate my specific consciousness and integrated information over there would generate your specific consciousness? Global workspace over here would generate my specific consciousness and global workspace there would generate your specific consciousness? Orchestrated quantum collapse in microtubules over here would generate my specific consciousness and orchestrated quantum collapse in microtubules over there would generate your specific consciousness? A clump of conscious atoms over here (panpsychicism) would generate my specific consciousness and a clump of conscious over there would generate your specific consciousness? If an exact copy of my body was suddenly created in antarctica would I find myself to exist freezing there while also sitting in the comfort my living room? According to the physicalists that would have to be true or their argument collapses into incoherence. Materialism already fails since it cannot find a transfer function between microvolt level sparks in the brain and any experience or qualia. In addition it’s not possible for materialistic ontologies to address this question of individuality since no measurement can be made that could verify my consciousness vs your consciousness and therefore no materialist ontology could make any coherent statements about the subject. How could pure awareness even be individualized? Physicalists demand measurements but with consciousness there is nothing to measure. There is electricity in the brain they say. We’ll measure that. Is electricity consciousness? If so then once I again I should exist everywhere at once since electricity cannot be individualized. My blender uses electricity. Is it a genius? Unless materialists can answer these questions their premise collapses like the house of cards it is. As far as other ways of thought are concerned only Dualism and Idealism can account for our sense of individuality. Dualism assumes we are all individual spirits/souls matched up to a body through some undefined process. Idealism, which states that consciousness is primary also answers the question of why I seem to exist as an individual. One consciousness exists looking out of every set of eyeballs and in the process the illusion of individuality is created in each case. In actual reality I am you, you are me, we are one.

[@davidgough3512]

i am you and you are me and we are we together i am the eggman i am the orchestrated microtubule quantum collapse i am the walrus coocoocachoo

[@valorierobinson5985]

Thank you. That was absolutely fascinating. I don't know if you've had and the exo politics.People on Your channel Like Doctor Michael Salla And friends. that opens a really big portal That's probably more foundational than anything. Especially viewing the incredibly high-tech.Earlier civilizations that have been on this planet !? Also the incredible work that. Dolores cannon did regarding multiple lives. And human healing?! This was one of the best podcasts I've heard in a long time. Thank you so much.😊🎉❤🎇🎆🌏 Planet and galaxy under new management. Billions of people past present and future. Watchedwhat Actually happened in the Trump White House. And on trips.✌️👩‍🚀And are now offering more assistance. For the asking. In my opinion of course but this brutal slaughterhouse of humans by humans is coming to a More peaceful Operating system bless your heart.s I like what you do.🙏

[@elziraaparecidadossantos9395]

O sentido lógico, demonstra a forma incompleta dos axiomas, o sentido em si, isso seria o que o Doutor Don está tentando demonstra. Gödel demonstrou que a logica em si não se sustenta, para mim a base de suas ideias é, ir alem da estagnação materialista. Isso é possivel

[@Natahan-in5dn]

I have commented on Donald's past videos atleast 1 other I wanted to spotlight that everything he is saying here has been said by UG krishnamurti. He says all you find yourself doing in the end with all this thought is sharpening the instrument which is the mind..but that's it.thoughts are tools no matter how serious you think your thought is it is NOT. Words are a dead thing trying to grasp something living IMPOSSIBLE. UG Is your pointer eventhough he also will let you know its not anything other than being ordinary in every way.

[@Greg-xs5py]

Didn't John Bell proved that quantum weirdness isn't due to lack of infomation. The famous EPR paper/experiment posited that QM had hidden variables that made the theory incomplete. John Bell proved that a hidden variable theory of QM is inconsistent with experimental results.

[@worldclassish]

If we could move from our space time to any other space time we could return at a different location. So you could transport water from a flooded area to a forest fire or a drought stricken place. You could even come back at a different time. Or a different planet. We need to know more.

[@marygee3981]

❤The structure of that geometric form is an illusion.

[@marygee3981]

That geometric form is in the headset... remove the headset.

[@SebastianSchepis]

The scientific work that I've been doing is very much connected to this.. Observational Dynamics formalizes observation as entropy flows and is predictive. If you're interested I can swing by your Discord and drop a link.

[@nickyocean]

GOOD LUCK

[@thotparnassus2617]

In this paradoxical realm how on earth could one even begin to to think that they can imagine all possibilities? There is always that glitch that could not have been seen before hand….a ghost in the machine…an anomaly that no one could’ve predicted…. This variable will always destroy the human attempt to nail down the unexplainable

[@thotparnassus2617]

How could one even place a name upon that which lies outside of everything that is in space time…..? There would exist no language to describe such a thing….a language bound by space time .

[@thotparnassus2617]

Can one name the unnamable? And the unnamable remain unnamed?

[@thotparnassus2617]

Can a human even grasp what a “god” would be??? Only if the human contained the dna of the so-called gods.

[@thotparnassus2617]

Since gravity is only a theory according to Newton himself…. It would not be needed within a holographic electric universe. In a hologram….the hologram projects into the environment free from any force pulling it down. The character can only move in preprogrammed positions upon the screen ….and a theory for the forced holding them down is not necessary.

[@thotparnassus2617]

Such a maddening task to take on…. Attempting to name that which can not be named 😂

[@oliver_siegel]

54:18 Experimental science (empiricism) can only ever give us knowledge about things that we experience. The word experiment comes from the word experience. Surely you can gather knowledge about things that are outside of experience, but it would be a stretch to say that you’re doing “science” with anything that’s outside of experience. At least then you no longer mean “the scientific method” or empiricism, when referring to “doing science”. You'd be doing something else altogether...

[@burthurt8365]

Indeed . Again , thought experiments are fine . In fact I think its a lost platonic art of retroductive thinking . But at some point you must exit the rabbit hole .

[@oliver_siegel]

@@burthurt8365 there's definitely value in going down the rabit hole of the unprovable, hypothetical, or imaginary! ✨

[@childofkhem1.618]

I think some people either don't take the time, or refuse to acknowledge, how many scientistific breakthroughs start with a weird intuition or in deep meditation. I could make the case that ALL breakthrough come this way. The evidence for this is staggering if u look for it but many don't talk openly about it due to stigma from academia and mainstream science. Most of the time it takes decades to prove a theory that the persons intuition tells them is correct but that's due to the healthy rigor of science. I'm interested in the 1% nobody is paying attention to.

[@liamhickey359]

Is knowledge outside of experience actually knowledge? Somebody once said science's purpose is not to bridge gap the between fact and human values.

[@angloland4539]

❤

[@aloisraich9326]

Is it 10 To the minus 33 cm, I need a t-shirt with this

[@JerimeBascon]

Therefore its here has landed on "EARTH..

[@youtubebane7036]

Every time he says we I'm like what you got a mouse in your pocket. He's piggybacking himself off other people's work

[@MikeG-js1jt]

2015?.... I think he meant to say 1915 ?

[@GBuckne]

..space time, are two words, they're using mathematical constructs to find fundamental structure to what has not been defined in the first place, I don't see the logic in saying there's an end to something that has not been defined in the first place, and it winds up being semantics...

[@burthurt8365]

Indeed . It's nonsensical an undefined at inception .

[@ericcricket4877]

​@@burthurt8365There are no spaces before periods.

[@ericcricket4877]

​@@burthurt8365There are clear axioms and proof, but only if you bother to read.

[@ericcricket4877]

They aren't finding the fundamental structure, they are proposing an alternative paradigm to ontological reality. Hoffman, Gödel and many others have said that there is no fundamental model due to the relationship between a model and a system and the requirement for a fundamental model to self-encapsulate.

[@ericcricket4877]

These mathematical constructs are models. He is proposing that perceptions are models, and that these models aren't fundamental, and that the system constructing these models is inherently a conscious system in a sense that it's not material, as in perceivable as is from without, and as in the model it constructs. It's really straightforward actually, but the vast majority of people like the safety, comfort and certainty that the physicalist paradigms offer in their claim of the ultimate truth, you know, like religion.

[@suzettedarrow8739]

Hoffman seems odd. He thinks 10^-33 centimeters is "shallow"? What about 10^-33 trillion kilometers?

[@ericcricket4877]

He speaks about how arbitrary those limiting numbers are, while space-time is supposedly fundamental.

[@suzettedarrow8739]

10^-33 trillion kilometers is just as arbitrary. Hoffman's view is an exercise in arbitrariness :(@@ericcricket4877

[@saberier2]

everyone is god in their ego

[@angelatakano6072]

Loved everything except the colonialism but why does it have to be present in all the discussions?

[@DemystifySci_Podcast]

I mean it's the water in which we swim, how can it not be? If we're not going to repeat the mistakes of the past we need to have an understanding of what went wrong, how it went wrong, how it went right, and how to thread the needle of "better" without losing anything vital in the process.

[@eancarana]

His example of Markovian Dynamics doesn't even remotely match other definitions found online. And he never gave a definition, just a very simple example that he said matched the definition. It didn't; he sounds like a grifter.

[@jared_r]

You sound like a grifter

[@nowenterpsie]

I really love Donald Hoffman's razor sharp intellect, intellectual honesty, humility and spirituality. I also have to hand it to you two for a great interview, very interesting and intelligent questions and issues raised. Beautiful.

[@Tired_Patriot]

Anytime I see a video with Hoffman in it I KNOW I'm about to learn something cool! What a BRILLIANT theory! I don't understand everything he's talking about: and I end up watching his interviews MULTIPLE times and each time I understand a little bit more. He is entertaining AND educational and I love it! Thank you for bringing him on again; you just earned a new sub and like!!

[@sanderklaasen]

Like Krishnamurti said; my words don't have any validity until you experience it for yourself...

[@mtmind6560]

Correct you are. This is like a person who lost his wallet but never checked his back pocket.

[@darkmatter6714]

A complementary quote comes to mind. “When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?” - John Meynard Keynes, during a high level government hearing.

[@PhillyHardy]

@@darkmatter6714curious, what is your theory on these things? Cause I don’t know who this guy is, but as someone who saw a damn exact similar phenomena that was seen on skinwalker while my fiancé was next to me,

[@darkmatter6714]

@@PhillyHardy My view is we need to be open-minded when it comes to science. In fact, the whole of scientific doctrine was pervaded through and built upon radical thinkers, who dared to buck the dogmas and narratives of their day, upsetting many along the way, who were too rooted in their beliefs to accept other truths. That’s my stance on this. As for my own view of what might be going on here, I think there’s a high likelihood that what Professor Hoffman is advocating will someday hold to be true. Physicists who are rooted in the materialistic sciences will rubbish him, because they see the world as only describable through the study of matter and he’s not a physicist. Yet consider this: The Oxford and Cambridge academics of their day who tried to solve the longitude problem in navigation couldn’t do it, until prize money worth millions in today’s money was put up for anyone who could. Their noses were firmly put out of joint when an illiterate clockmaker came up with the solution. They even tried to deny him the prize money because they couldn’t stomach the idea of being upstaged by an uneducated commoner, but he got it in the end. The problem of predicting volcanic eruptions in South America was solved, not by volcanologists, but by biologists. They noticed the local frog population they were studying would behave differently before an eruption and discovered that their skin was sensitive to the gases oozing through the ground before an eruption. So how does this apply to what’s going on here? Well, we all thought we cracked it with Newton and his theory of gravity but along came Einstein and replaced that “truth” with his theories of general and special relativity. Then came Max Plank with the theory of quantum mechanics, which Einstein utterly rejected because the theory was pointing to a reality beyond space and time. He couldn’t hack that idea. Then, in 2022, Aspect, Clauser and Zeilinger won the Nobel Prize in physics by proving that entangled particles which transcend the dimensions of time and the speed of light are real. This definitively proves that the world we see, hear and touch is not the full story - that there is a dimension of existence beyond our physical senses. Enter Hoffman. EDIT: a good time to cite another quote by John Meynard Keynes: “The difficulty lies not so much in developing new ideas as in escaping from old ones.”

[@gtau3144]

Great discussion. I would recommend Dr Hoffman as the one person to listen to if you can only listen to one.

[@crazy1gadgets1]

Him, and Bernardo Kastrup, I would recommend

[@We-Do-NOT-Consent-303]

The Yogies have kniwn this for 1000s of years. I have been to other dimensions in my meditations 1000s of times. Also I am aware that I am not in the body or in spacetime. I am still in the oridinal "Dimention" of no dimention, no space, no time, no Mind. I have never gone anywhere, because there is nowhere to go, except in my imagination. The scientusts are always playing cachup. And they are not humble. enough to ask the yogies what is going on.

[@We-Do-NOT-Consent-303]

You can see other colors, when you take psychedelics. Because the psychedelic accelerates your consciousness. You dont see with your eyes, you see with your consciousness. The eyes are a kind of filter. When you exit the body, you an see better.

[@Shotkangaroo]

@@We-Do-NOT-Consent-303 have you ever tried DMT? Sadly I haven’t but would be really keen to try. Saw a recent interview with Gallimore, who suggests that it takes you to another dimension and you communicate with ‘beings’. It would be great to listen to a physicist that has an experienced that and asked the beings questions about the amplitudehedron.

[@jamesconway9277]

Amazing conceptual consciousness based physics.

[@Vunderbread]

Wonderful discussion, though my favorite aspect is how often he repeats “These are brilliant theories”, “These are brilliant men. … Even geniuses in many cases.” And then proceeds to effectively trash them.

[@rareartists]

He’s a kind savage. And he’s correct to be. As Don suggests, if they would get past their ego and see the obvious fact they they’re all in a dead end, their efforts could greatly accelerate the momentum of Don’s work and a deeper understanding of the nature of Consciousness / reality.

[@stratcaptain66]

Thats what all these academics do, they call their colleagues geniuses, because they really need to believe that. They honestly feel they are above the rest of humanity, of course this is horse shit. I like Donald Hoffman and Tom Campbell and the whole simulation theory. However of Hoffman thinks the space program and the “moon landings” are real, then he’s not really a genius, is he? Maybe an idiot savant.🤷🏻‍♂️

[@Hyacinth_Rose]

lmaoooooooooooooo hahahahahhahahaha

[@alkintugsal7563]

No he isn’t brutal you haven’t seen brutality in your life he is very gentle with it.😂

[@myfriendscat]

Thank you for having Dr. Hoffman back for a second round. I understand his ideas much better now. I hadn't realized before that his thoughts on spirituality and science were so sensible, to me.

[@santacruzman8483]

Your discussion of and focus on the pragmatic aspects of how viewing consciousness as primary is actually life affirming rather than a simply a theoretical concept and can measurably help us all lead more peaceful, interesting and profound lives is immensely valuable for me. Much thanks to all.

[@drkzilla]

It never occurred to me that space time has a limited resolution! I'm glad people are thinking about these ideas.

[@---ko9jf]

That doesn't necessitate a realm that exists outside of it

[@drkzilla]

@@---ko9jf well it takes into consideration non locality at least. We need people thinking about these issues as it's clear our current understandings of physics is lacking.

[@Vunderbread]

@@---ko9jfI recommend re-listening, Hoffman explains fairly well why he thinks such realms are indeed necessitated

[@crazy1gadgets1]

@@---ko9jf The contents of our "perception" are limited to the resolution we can achieve based on the limits of granularity imposed by the Heisenberg Uncertainty (i.e. the Plank length). Just because we cannot even with our best instruments make physical measurements below that Plank limit, does not refute a realm beyond it, either. To your point, however, unless these lowest levels of perceived measurement beyond our best resolution are "grounded" to something that mirrors the salient aspects of "nature at large" (i.e. beyond our space-time, as Hoffman and current high-energy physics is showing), and not "arbitrary", there would be no utility to our having evolved our perceptions within space-time, limited as they are, to enable us survive and thrive in the "world as it is", which is yet beyond our best perceptions. Bernardo Kastrup addresses this concept at depth in his discussion of "the ontic structure realism" in the below video interview at about approx 1:20, ... kzbin.info/www/bejne/qoXNpXSNqsSshbs

[@innerlight617]

1.17.18:DH:..the deeper picture is ,not only life but consciousness is fundamental,so we are never creating life we are only creating new portals into life, so no new life is being created,only new projections of life.." Wow!Thanks Dr Hoffman for spreading knowledge and wisdom!🙏

[@koldunya2002]

RAZOR SHARP INTELLECT OF DONALD Hoffman is evident! Equally impressed with the interviewers!

[@user-lu9hq6jv4v]

Awesome; truly great interviewers with Donald Hoffman!

[@cherylchaudhary7736]

this talk is one of the best I have ever come across!!! Thank you This is amazing!!

[@youngblast10]

Is it that our headset is cheap or we haven’t unlocked all the features of the headset yet just asking?

[@Toastedandtoasted]

From what I've seen I'd say certain features the headset are turned off. And arrive at this by combining this info and experiences from those that were near death at some point in life. But even then, is it really a headset or is it just another past of this grand illusion?

[@nickidaisydandelion4044]

32:09 The Amplituhedron fascinates me the most. I dreamed about it and it showed itself in form of very large gravity defying ocean waves in the Atlantic ocean where one wave formed itself into the tree of life and the other formed itself into a galaxy. The message was life is sacred don't waste it which is something Jiddu Krishnamurti has always said. The tree wave said Never cut anymore trees. The galaxy wave said that we are all in this together and we need to respect one another and never hurt another living being ever again. All beings and all beingness is equally precious.

[@life42theuniverse]

Consciousness is nonlocal in spacetime.

[@interactivevirtualtours]

Again, Brings to mind the Kungkarangkalpa Seven Sisters story associated with Pleiades. It's interesting to relate with people who have a 60,000year old tradition as a foundation.

[@darkmatter6714]

On the subject of physicists rubbishing this new paradigm of non physicality and conscious agents, a quote springs to mind: “The difficulty lies not so much in developing new ideas as in escaping from old ones”. - John Meynard Keynes.

[@IntuitArt-rb4br]

Thanks so much for this. The topics starting @01:34:00 are so inspiring. Anastasia is wonderful - both of you are - thank you. Subscribed.

[@quest_onchannel54]

The universe is 99% plasma. What we consider solid reality is def. An exceptional state of matter. We ought to study plasmas deeper before we dive into such metaphysical speculation.

[@terrytichey6269]

PLEASE STOP INTERRUPTING YOUR GUESTS .. LET THEM FINISH THE POINT THEY ARE MAKING.... PLEASE

[@ronniehopper8554]

What he is saying is what Alan Watts was saying over 50 years ago.

[@davehowes5162]

Yes. Although instead of math and physics Watts would use "knowing" chuckles.

[@childofkhem1.618]

I love the fact that people are doing real research to find out what exists below the plank scale but is it really worth the time and energy when we (people) can never get correct data due to the measurement problem of quantum mechanics? It Might just be easier to say that the only thing that exists below the plank scale or beyond the horizon scale is consciousness. (if we define consciousness at the energy that exist when a particle reaches absolutely zero, or vaccume fluctuation) I think that's as far as we will ever get. Consciousness is simply the force that animates therefore everything is conscious and it's the most fundimental force we can measure or observe

[@Thexman2thestreet]

you guys need to interview tom campbell he is on board with virtual reality

[@essecj59]

Tom Campbell has been talking about the same theory for almost 30 years.

[@lisaoliveras8910]

Precisely at 21:44 Black and white is all i see, in my infancy Red and yellow then came to be, reaching out to me Lets me see the electromagnetic Energy in the infinite possibilities Over thinking and Over Analyzing separates the body from the mind^ 10 to the -33 is only in this simulated 3rd dimension construct (lowest level of reality) Boundries of spacE and timE is to Emit all the E -caps(ENERGY CAPACITORS) to their chakra's Rx /Txing back to the Source They didn't tell you, how they play the game? Life is a game, originally created to experience, that which you are not^ Who are you? What do you know? What do you deserve in life? Didn't just fall out the womb! Universe=you inverse/innerstanding Open minds open doors no man can close, you come from the highest level of reality, time to make space and time for your self

[@ZenithE8]

This sadly doesnt seem for the layman He is getting very technical

[@beatrizgalvec7193]

I think that the world and the body are real and not an illusion. Consciousness is fundamental, but our bodies are real too. I think his point of view is too extreme.

[@Secretgeek2012]

Okay, then please do the math and refute his argument. You need to remember this isn't just something he's saying, it's something he's literally seen in the math.

[@marygee3981]

🎉I have a question- If everyone finds out how cool it is to leave the physical body, and many just check out, what would happen?

[@lordchaos1111]

Anyone else noticed that his higher dimensional objects look a lot like a vector database, and Markov kernals look a lot like the Transformer architecture? Is his implication that our reality is a story being generated by something like ChatGPT?

[@stephenbastasch7893]

What's supposed to happen if and when we "break through" to those ultimate decorated permutations? What will that tell us about them and about us? They have "agency", but what is it they do? Do they resemble Jungian archetypes? Are they the underpinnings of a simulated universe? I have no idea, of course...

[@Leafyoga_]

Love the Doctors work. The spiritual sciences tell us the analytical scientific mind does not exist in that which is outside of space time (Prakriti). The other side can only be experienced not scientifically analyzed. Keep pushing tho.

[@blackbird69xxx]

Man is misguided looking for the so called God particle and below the Plank scale , we are unable to see or measure Prakriti...its the bridge between Spirit and matter isn't it :)

[@wbaiey0]

Love your work. Love your contribution to humanity. Thank you dear, Sir.

[@0x44Monad]

It's all mumbo jumbo in land of figment

[@abexman]

Hoffman touches on tech to explore the conscious side and to play with the "portals" - wondering if you can explore this in future conversations with him

[@saturdaysequalsyouth]

Black holes, the speed of light, the direction of time, causality, the big bang, planck's constant... all of these sound like boundaries or edges of our reality. Is it necessary that whatever is beyond these boundaries an inform us of our own reality?

[@tomdorman2486]

Wow, how wonderful! You guys are putting out some wonderful content these days! As for the one desiring to know itself. I would sew if slightly different in that perhaps the one is growing through information however it can. So everything is contributing.

[@SeiroosFardipour-sy3sh]

I don't admire those ingratitude toward mystical experience we just to look at all those places of cult the drawings and architecture talks about symmetries, fractals, hologram, magic numbers ,chess,cards,they all say the same things about nature of consciousness,if scientist were too blind to see that is not the fault of esoterism explanations.

[@TimCollins-gv8vx]

About 1 month ago I walked out the back yard at night and saw this light that was half blue half red with sparking white outline. Every night when i go outside at night I see theses shadow lights pass over the tree. They move very fast about the size of a basketball. Its pretty odd.

[@dennycote6339]

Science is man working with conciousness at the highest technology possible, AI, LHC, etc. Spirituality is man working with conciousness without ANY technology. Why should they disagree?

[@zenlama]

David Bohms "Implicate Order", outside Space/time. in no-space, perhaps information and potential. The Explicate Order is the manifestation of Space-time and all else. The implicate order is beyond 10 to the minus 33cm.

[@CaptainSkyHigh95]

Her voice sounds like ASMR. I’m actually fairly annoyed by ASMR and could not figure out why I was having a negative response to her. It’s became clear after a while. No disrespect to her as she’s clearly well spoken and intelligent. Stupid ASMR channels ruined the feminine voice for my ears :(

[@mikeholden7597]

Mr Hoffman ❤❤❤❤ Speaking of truth It's a shame 90 percent of humans don't get it. We're all part of creation, Stop fighting each other.

[@Artezia]

Once one experience the “ground”, “”beyond”, “hyperspace” or whatever name you like, any theory about it will be a pale shadow of what it really is. Any idea about it will be endless verbiage and nonsense, because the real meaning is the experience itself rather than any explanation of it. Thought cannot capture that dimension and project all kind of ideas.

[@Boris29311]

This dude needs to take a break from his KZbin-addiction.He's on countless different channels and drifting further and further from testible science.Claiming his assumptions may be proven in the future. I saw him even on a CTMU channel....

[@sanderklaasen]

Ofcourse, spiritual science has been in the world for over a century, in the form of Anthroposophy by Rudolf Steiner...

[@ALavin-en1kr]

The four beasts of the apocalypse: motion, space, time and the atom mentioned in iRevelation may be just a mirage. Maybe that is why they were called ‘beasts’ because they deceive.

[@jj4cpw]

Sorry, Don but I think our world is pretty sublimely beautiful. Too bad you don’t. Otherwise, I always enjoy your wisdom

[@HealthFoodRx]

I have a theory that the pyramids symbolize the perspectival dispersion of being through “time”.

[@SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi]

Beyond space time particulars are made of grids and motifs where theirs virtual probabilities are the ones that motives them their dimensions would be multi dimensional and fractals behaviours

[@ebptube]

----It is probably a mistake to use the word "consciousness" in this theory because it confuses the readers/listeners and derails the ideas behind it all.

[@SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi]

It is the weirdest idea that ever came out man's mind but it make sense,if time and space are all arbitrary then we just live in a dream world

[@JoyceElroy-z9w]

White Melissa Anderson Karen Jackson Shirley

[@stephenpalmer-zh9dq]

probably where missing people wind up and airplanes

[@Shotkangaroo]

Does our local conscience link through Orch Or to the amplitudehedron?

[@user-cg3tx8zv1h]

@1:18:07 Then, I suppose we can perhaps say that, the phisicalists are used car sales men...

[@Gan_Gineandro]

I appreciate the conversation.

[@Wtf-eva]

Maybe below ten to the minus thirty three is where virtual particles originate.

[@KRAU5555]

"Particles outside of spacetime" and "mathematical structures outside of spacetime" makes no sense. "Spacetime is a dumbed down interface" also makes no sense.

[@Secretgeek2012]

Only to those that don't understand what he's saying.

[@hermes.trismegistus616]

My guy jumping on his chair literally gives me anxiety

Dr Hoffman looks like has found Platonic consiousness