Ebert & Roeper Review The Films of... Christopher Nolan

[@Vanilla_Skynet]

A riff on my usual show, here we have a non-linear compilation of Ebert & Roeper (mainly) reviewing the films of Christopher Nolan Obviously (and unfortunately) Siskel never lived to see a Nolan film, so it would be wrong to title this "Siskel & Ebert Review..." From Memento to Dunkirk (except for Insomnia, unfortunately): 00:21 Dunkirk (Roeper solo) 02:00 Memento (Ebert & Roeper) 06:49 Interstellar (Roeper solo) 09:00 Batman Begins (Ebert & Roeper, then solo Ebert) 15:00 The Prestige (Roeper & A.O. Scott) 19:02 Inception (Roeper solo) 20:37 The Dark Knight (Roeper & Michael Phillips, then Ben Lyons & Ben Mankiewicz) 29:57 The Dark Knight Rises (Roeper solo) Primarily for educational purposes, but enjoy however you see fit! For more of this series: kzbin.info/aero/PLjog8SEXXlNV9hSA2USQDeuz-Njrkhuar&si=9MBkX8IAqz2l-B1b

[@legojoker111]

Clever to play with the timeline of Nolan's filmography

[@Vanilla_Skynet]

Thanks! My way of making it more fun considering Siskel's absence

[@ryanpyle9822]

Very creative editing. I enjoyed it.

[@hmrnsam94]

Great job.

[@sway6718]

Unpopular opinion, and I love Siskel & Ebert, but I prefer Ebert and Roeper more.

[@movie-mandan]

WHAT!?!? 😲 😲

[@bryansmith2479]

All respect to your opinion, but TWO THUMBS WAY DOWN !

[@spinin1251]

Ebert and Roeper had more cooperation and less antagonism, hence it feels like the show and their dialogue flowed more naturally. Their personalities didn't clash and so neither did the content. It was easier to watch. But Siskel and Ebert were very different from each other. Even when they agreed on movies, they would have some different way of looking at them or find something to disagree about. It was never smooth and frequently argumentative. But the content was way more interesting and you truly would get 2 different viewpoints.

[@sway6718]

Appreciate all of your opinions 😊