Third-Degree Price Discrimination or Segmenting

This video shows how to solve a basic price discrimination problem when the firm uses segmenting.
If this video helps, please consider a donation: www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...

[@tayyabaraza264]

25 is Q not 80.....when I was solving I recognized this mistake..Tc is 30Q

[@fifihei]

Loved this video! I got an exam in 2-3 hours. Hope that it will be save my life! Keep up with the great efforts!

[@michellemiddleton5173]

Thank you for the helpful video - none of my economics material explained it this well!

[@damhippos]

Thank you so much! You are a million times better than my economics teacher. You are a goddamn hero.

[@walidmohamed9237]

beautiful explanation. keep on the good work!

[@MediaWorkify]

This is awesome sir, thank you very much for uploading this!!!

[@de5339]

thank you, for some extra help here :) some professors cant explain the most basic economic equations beacuse they only read results that they took from somewhere else anyway.

[@feudala12]

thanks mate so much appreciated that was rly helpful. keep on going bro.

[@yowanyowan5168]

Thanks sir I learnt lot from you 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

[@aminurkhan5376]

Great video sir. Thank you so much

[@Mohareal]

Where did the 2Q come from?

[@sophiamalik1729]

You're amazing! Thank you!!!!

[@barovierkevinallybose1040]

you mislead me for my exam (but can't say I haven't learnt from you during the semester) but you are suppose to evaluate the appropriate price level before determining what quantity demand function to use. You went directly to just using the aggregate demand function.

[@teenskeey2157]

Wow man...God bless you

[@henriettaifyede1737]

In the example without price discrimination, isn't p = 130- Q and MR = 130-2Q? where Q is 50 and not 25? How did you get p = 130-2Q?

[@daniellake9955]

Great Video

[@nicolasvoisard6139]

thank you you saved my exams i love u

[@gunsandroses4]

4:45 isn't Q = 25 and not 80?

[@EconomicsinManyLessons]

Thanks for finding the error. The correction is noted in the video.

[@Hercules003]

It was a typo, he still got the right result though of $1250-otherwise it would have been -400!

[@serinacat4781]

hope you can post a second price discrimination

[@bulkacademy9267]

very helpful thanx

[@RAVIKUMAR-ky2rc]

Super sir👍👌

[@Claudia-pp6on]

very helpful

[@vuyontshangase8624]

You're the best!!!

[@EconomicsinManyLessons]

Thank you. I appreciate that!

[@funnyvideobymonster2795]

Is it possible to do the problem without knowing the value of MC or MR?

[@adstylesfit]

no

[@aparnaagarwal4364]

thank you so so much...

[@dheliyaisuranga5205]

Sir,Please can explain me how to get the market supply equation of below question There are 100 identical firms in the market. P=200-2Q TC=32+20q+8q^2 MC=20+16q

[@EconomicsinManyLessons]

This video will help: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKfJmaGVmc-MqKs

[@Mandy-sx7li]

Thank you :)

[@yutongkang578]

why MR is double of P?

[@EconomicsinManyLessons]

It's just a fact that MR will have a slope that is twice as steep as its linear demand curve. Here's the proof: p = a - bq. TR = pq = (a - bq)q and simplifying TR= aq - bq^2. To get MR take the derivative of TR or dTR/dq = MR = a - 2bq.

[@ardasev]

this is wrong you cant add up demand curves like that you need to make horizontal sum. if price were to be 10 first customers will buy 20 and second customers would buy 0 not -5 so demand is 20 for 10 . If you plug 10 in summed up equation demand becomes 15 . very wrong.............

[@awsalmanmohamed8428]

i think the inverse demand function is p=13-0.2Q.

[@awsalmanmohamed8428]

i got it! thanks

[@muhammadalim8038]

App NY explain achay tarap Kia hy... Magar Mera samj main nahe a rah hae app assan tareeka main explain krly app ka mehrbhani ho gy

[@liuzeyu1044]

Hi, I understand that P=130-2Q but why you can get MR=130-4Q?

[@EconomicsinManyLessons]

zeyu liu total revenue = PxQ = (130-Q)Q = 130Q - 2Q^2. After taking the derivative of total revenue, we get MR = 130 - 4Q.

[@liuzeyu1044]

Thank you so much sir

[@abdelrahmankamel8417]

incorrect results please revised your numbers

[@emerenciananchimbi428]

i did,nt get it how 5p=65_q turned into p=130-2q

[@EconomicsinManyLessons]

Emerenciana Nchimbi There is a decimal point in front of the 5; it should read 0.5p = 65 - q. After dividing both sides by 0.50, you get p = 130 - 2q.

[@emerenciananchimbi428]

+1sportingclays sorry sir.0.5 how😞?

[@EconomicsinManyLessons]

Emerenciana Nchimbi Q1 = 40 - 0.2P1 and Q2 = 25 - 0.3P2. Q1 + Q2 = Q = 65 - 0.5P.

[@emerenciananchimbi428]

+1sportingclays okay.....thank you

[@ericmokua3311]

@@EconomicsinManyLessons clearly it shows that's 5 and not 0.5

[@MediaWorkify]

You made an error. 83.33 - 3.33*8 is 56.69, not 56.67. Therefore profit etc is incorrect

[@MLSfootballz]

boss