Editorial Analysis | 16 September 2024 | The Hindu Analysis, Vocab, Reading, Grammar | Rupam Ma'am

[@BankingWallah]

📌 Our Affordable Batches : 👉 Bank Mahapack- physicswallah.onelink.me/ZAZB/lurri5ka 👉 AIM Foundation Batch 2025-26: physicswallah.onelink.me/ZAZB/4yvmub4f 👉 Banking Test ONE PASS: physicswallah.onelink.me/e0oG/opnklqrz 👉 Maha Vishwas Pack (2 years): physicswallah.onelink.me/ZAZB/miywgf40 👉 To Get daily DPPs, CA and Tricks, Checkout: t.me/pwbankingwallah

[@dimishamahyavanshi8098]

Nutshell of article ~ Today's article is about the fair probe for Delhi chief Minister Arvind kejriwal. With the sanction of two member of bench the Supreme Court granted bail while at the cusp of release the CBI want to incarcerated kajriwal on charge of corruption. Under the stringent regime he was also released on conditional bail . Justice kant and justice ujjal Bhuyan consensus on the point of CBI but it quite dubious about the time of arrest . It's seem to be propensity toward puissant government and not fair probe are done. It also rise question on CBI reputation. Manish sisodia case is an reminder for justice that bail cannot be delay or denied on the basis of punishment. Justice Bhuyan told there should be a fair investigation. Thank you wow ma'am ❤❤

[@shrutigupta0210]

16 September 2024 A two-judge Supreme Court Bench granted bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in the Delhi excise policy case but was divided on the legality of his arrest by the CBI on corruption charges. While Justice Surya Kant found no procedural violation, as the CBI had obtained court permission for questioning and arrest, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan questioned the timing of the arrest, noting it came just as Kejriwal was set to be released in a related money-laundering case. Justice Bhuyan criticized the CBI for potentially biased actions and stressed that arrest power should not be used arbitrarily. Both judges also questioned the Delhi High Court’s delay in addressing Kejriwal’s bail plea, suggesting it unnecessarily prolonged his imprisonment. Thankyou Ma'am🌺✨

[@SifaAli-l1d]

A two-member bench had granted regular bail to Delhi C.M. Arvind Kejrival in money laundering case is opposed to each other in the case of CBI put Kejribal in jail. Justice Surya kant and Justice Ujjawal Bhuyan were agreed upon that Kejriwal was permitted to bail. Kejriwal is not in need of go to the trial court as the CBI wanted. Justice Bhuyant roundly observed that the timing of CBI to put him in jail is dubious.Because it did not feel the need of arresting Kejriwal for 22 months . But all of sudden when he released in the ED case ,it felt urgency to arrest him.The judge has highlighted that accused has the right to stay silent. 🥰😃 Thankyou so much mam

[@deepeshmeena1608]

Today' Editorial Summary: A two member bench of the Supreme Court(including Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan) grant bail to Delhi CM Mr Arvind Kejriwal in Money laundering case. But, it got divided again on the legality of his arrest by CBI after 22 months long time when he was at the cusp of release in ED (Enforcement Directorate) case. Justice Kant found no violation of the procedure but Juatice Buhyan found the timing of arrest of Kejriwal to be very suspicious. Justice Bhuyan observation also reflects about the declining reputation of CBI, and it needs to work thoroughly to dispel the notion of caged parrot and needs to be completely fair in its all investigations. The two member bench also noticed and criticized High Court on rejecting and delaying Mr Kejriwal's bail and advice it to consider bail on merit basis rather than approaching the lower court first. Thank You So Much Ma'am 🙏❣

[@sakshirajput47]

A two-member bench of the supreme court had different opinions on cbi's charges which imposed on Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal ji. Justice Bhuyan observed it Cannot be a coincidence that CBI sent him back to trial when he was on cusp. On the other hand justice Kant found no violation. Justice Bhuvan questioned to CBI's actions and advised to not to be biased. Thank you..

[@surbhishrivastava5502]

A two member bench of the Supreme court granted bail to the Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal who was accused of money laundering case. But after his release CBI wanted to send him back to the trial court. Here violation of procedure and something suspicious is noted by the judges against CBI. CBI is an individual body and it ought to ensure fairness in the investigation. Thank you Ma'am ❤

[@SifaAli-l1d]

1-b👍 2-c 👍 3-d 👍 4-d 👎 b 5-a👍 7-c👍 8- b👍 9- e👍 Thankyou so much aaj live attend nhi kr paye the but recorded dekha h or loyalty ke sath ans kia h mam😍😍😍😍😍😍

[@ruchigupta3558]

The CBI has arrested Mr. Arvind Kejriwal after the conditional bail granted by two member bench of the supreme court to him on money laundering case. Justice Kant did not find any error on the procedure of his arrest.The CBI had approached the trial court for permission to question Mr. Kejriwal and later they arrested him but Justice Bhuyan observed that the timing of his arrest is suspected. Thankyou ma'am ❤

[@salonikumari425]

Summary :- On the Kejriwal bail order and CBI conduct A two- member bench of the Supreme Court has been formed for bail of Delhi's Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. There are two judges in which, Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan. Mr. Kejriwal who is in incarceration due to money laundering and corruption. Justice SuryaKant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan said that CBI is not conducting its work properly. When, Mr. Kejriwal was about to be released from ED case, the CBI suddenly or urgently accused him for money laundering. CBI is a reputed and independed agency, it should not bias for any party or anyone. And the judiciary should also ensure that, the CBI works correctly and fairly. Thank You! Ma'am🌹

[@sarikayadavv]

Cusp -verge,brink, threshold,(kagar) Stringent -strict, rigorous Incarceration -imprisionment, detention High handed- autocratic,imperious,arbitatatory Disposition -nature, tendency, inclination, temperament

[@ANJALIbanker.]

6/10 Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in excise policy case was divided legality. Under the corruption charges and money laundering charges Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal was arrested. Deputy chief Minister Manish Sisodia and Bharat Rashtra samithi leader K. Kavita are straigent prevention of money laundering Act.The CBI had not felt to arrest him for 22 months. That is urgency questioned. When CBI was on the cusp of released in the ED( Enforcement Directorate) case.

[@twinklerajput2882]

A two-member bench of supreme court granted bail to Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal in a money laundering case .After his release in an Ed case, he was arrested by the CBI. Initially CBI approached the trial court for permission to arrest kejriwal.Justice Bhuyan observed that the timing of arrest was suspect but justice kant found no procedural violations by the CBI.Justice Bhuyan 's statements questioned the CBI reputation ,noting that no one would disagree that CBI investigations are often unfair and biased. However, the bail order in the Manish Sisodia case reminded judges that bail cannot be denied as a form of punishment.Justice Bhuyan's statement served as a reminder to the CBI to conduct fair investigations. Both judges noted that the high court should have considered bail on its merits. Thanku ma'am ❤️

[@MoniiSinghh]

The Supreme Court granted bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in the Delhi excise policy case with two judges (Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan) disagreeing on the legitimacy of his detention by the CBI. Both judges agreed that Kejriwal was entitled to bail but Justice Bhuyan questioned the timing of the detention, calling it questionable and noting that the CBI didn't detain him for 22 months. Justice Bhuyan also emphasized the right of the accused to remain silent and criticized the CBI's tendency to cite lack of cooperation as a reason to keep suspects in custody. The judges also criticized the Delhi High Court for not considering bail on its merits and prolonging Kejriwal's detention. Overall, the judgment highlights the importance of impartial investigations and the right to bail.

[@sakshirani29_07]

A two member bench of supreme court granted bail to delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal on corruption money laundering charges. Justice Surta kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan questioned that When he was on the cusp on bail then why did CBI arrest him? Justice Bhuvan's observation also touched upon the CBI reputation. The bench recall that If CBI has the power to arrest someone, but this does not mean that you are high handed. If a suspect person is silent, it does not mean that he is guilty. Both the judges noted that the high court ought to considered bail on merits. Thank uh for the helpful session mam🎉

[@soul-7e]

The conditional bail was granted to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal by two judge bench of Supreme Court of India in the CBI case. The judges have distinction in there opinion as Justice Surya Kant said CBI legally followed the process but in the opinion of Justice Ujjal Bhuyan the timing of arrest of kejriwal is suspicious. Justice Bhuyan statement also raised the question on the reputation of CBI. Bench also said that cases should be handled in merits rather delaying them. Thank you 😇

[@Chhaya25-l1o]

Today's editorial crux... A two member bench of the supreme court granted conditional bail to Mr kejriwal in ED's case. At that time CBI arrested Mr kejriwal on corruption charges and asked permission for trial court. Although justice Kant says that the path followed by CBI is right because it firstly asked permission amd later on arrest him, founding guilty. While Mr Bhuyan says that his arresting time is skeptical. And why did CBI not arrest him for 22 months. And justice Bhuyan also recalls examples that if you have power to arrest someone it doesn't mean you can arrest anyone, who is taciturn. Because accused has right to remain slient during his trial and justice Bhuyan's judgement in Mr sisodiya's case is a remainder for CBI to do investigation fairly . Thanku ma'am❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ mai kabhi to mera comment le lijiye, pta nhi chlta mai shi likhti hu ya nhi 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

[@Kapskhagesh18]

A two member bench of Supreme Court granted bail to Delhi chief minister Arvind kejriwal on Sunday. Earlier, CM kejriwal got bail from Supreme Court in money laundering case but after few time CBI arrested him in liquor policy case. Justice suryakant and Justice Ujja Bhuyan said that CBI can arrest anybody, it has rights to arrest accused, but Justice ujjal Bhuyan questioned CBI about the timing of arrest. Justice Ujjal told to CBI that CBI should does their job without partiality. Working with partiality, it's not a good sign to democracy. Thank you ma'am

[@durgeshsaroha]

Thank you Ma'am ❤ My Score 9/10 Crux of today's editorial The Supreme court granted a bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who was arrested for money laundering charges. After the co- accused including Delhi's Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and Bharat Rashtra Samithi Leader k. Kavitha, more stringent of money laundering acts. And Justice Surya kant and Ujjal Bhuyan were in the holding that he was entitled to bail. Where the CBI wanted permissions to give the trial court Mr. Kajriwal. And later on, the arrest of him, Justice Bhuyan Bluntly observed that the timing of his arrest was suspect. CBI did not feel the need to arrest him for 22 months. He was on the verge of release in the Enforcement Directorate case. Justice Bhuvan also recalled precedents and observed touched upon the CBI's reputation. No one agrees with the view of that, CBI should strive to dispel the notion that it is a caged parrot. The judge has emphasized the right accused to remain silent. To remind all judges that the Manish Sisodia case cannot be denied as a matter of punishment. And Justice Bhuyan's separate judgement will be notable for its reminder CBI about its obligation to transparency in investigation. They also criticize the Delhi High Courts Order rejected bail to Mr. Sisodia. Firstly he should approach the trial court, both judges noted that the high court should have considered bail on merits. At the last moment it had not asked the petitioner itself to approach the lower court, observing delay in issuing notice and hearing the matter linger his incarnations.

[@armyoftheviralmath]

A two member bench of Supreme court granted bail to CM of Delhi Mr. Arvind Kejrial ,accused of money launderingcase. Then CBI imposed a new investigation and declined his bail and sent him to the trial court . Justice Surya kant and Ujjal Bhuyan commented on CBI's delay in investigation and they suspected CBI's decision is not fair. It acted like "a cage parrot " and it was trying to send kejriwal to a prolonged incarceration. A judicial body must not follow this kind of activity. So, CBI should ponder about its activities. Thank you!❤

[@ramanchahal2066]

Today's editorial crux:-- Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal was arrested by Ed case of liquor and money laundering.The bench of judges Surya Kanth and ujjal Bhuyan was divided in legalities of CM Arvind Kejriwal bail granted . Both judges noted that government delay in bail and prolonged the case. Thank you ma'am ❤️☺️ Ma'am phle wala thumbnail acha tha is wale me vibe ni aa rhi achi plz change kro ma'am.

[@AhiliyaKeshavsikre]

The CM of Delhi Arvind Kejriwal was granted bail by the two member bench of the supreme court that was divided on the legitimacy of his arrest by the CBI on corruption charges soon after the bail. Justice suryakant found no violation of procedures while justice Ujjal Bhuyan observed the dubious timing of arrest . He also criticised the High court's descision to send kejariwal for trial court. He emphasized that the desicion should be made on the merits of case .

[@chouhan3508]

Delhi cm arvind kejriwal granted a bail but CBI arrested him for money laundering case. Raised many questions on CBI timing. Justice bhuyan said the timing of his arrest was on suspect and there no need to arrest him, justice bhuyan also said that CBI power of arrest did not meant that they misused of it same in case. But justice surya kant say that CBI has done everything according to low . Thank you so much ma'am ❤❤

[@meghapal2041]

A two member committee of supreme court granted the bail to Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal in the case of money laundering but CBI arrested him now a two member committee was divided on the legality Justice Ujjal bhuyan said that the timing of his arrest was suspected while justice Surya Kant said he found no violation of procedure on his arrest Thank you mam apki wajah se meri English specially vocab due to wow vocab kafi increase hui hai ❤

[@AnkitaPaul-ts9nh]

Today's editorial crux:: A two number bench of the Supreme court granted bail to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal in money laundering case, at the same time, CBI arrested him on corruption charges. Two other accused are connected with the same case, Deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia and Bharat Rasthtra Samiti leader K. Kavitha easily get bail. But this is point to ba noted that some times after Mr. Kejriwal was also released on conditional bail. This two number of bench 's one judge said that, the CBI had legally procedure their duties for Mr. Kejriwal but another judge Bhuyan said , it's all right that their procedure was legal but their timing of action was wrong. Justice Bhuyan also said, the CBI is a completely unregulated organization but their behaviour looks like ' a caged parrot ' . So they noticed their duties. Both judges agreed together that Mr. Kejriwal case's is intentionally prolonged and this is a blackspot of our Law's......... thank you so much mam ❤️❤️

[@mancykumari2421]

Thank you so much ❤ mam 8/10 The CBI came into action when Delhi's chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal was at the cusp of release. Their action is being suspected by the justice , because of the time they chose to take the case into their hands , where were they for past 22 months .

[@Nibedita.Mondal]

The arrest of Arvind kejriwal by CBI after 22 months at the moment when he was just about to get his bail from ED's case of money laundering is a wrong timing remarked by justice Bhuyan and he also mentioned that if an accused person is not taking his stand at the court is not mean that he is the culprit.The honorable Supreme court also cleared it that CBI has the power to arrest an accused person but they can not use their power high handedly ❤❤❤❤

[@KannuChahuhan]

Thank you mam for the session ❤❤❤❤

[@GowardhanBansod-d9d]

Earlier thumbnail was better than today's

[@Shivanikushwaha-h9l]

he crux of today's editorial Arvind Kejriwal, Delhi Chief Minister, was granted bail by a two-member bench of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Justice Bhuyan questioned the timing of Arvind Kejriwal's detention, as the ED granted him bail while CBI arrested him. According to Justice Bhuyan, the CBI's actions are problematic and may lead to biassed findings. The bench has also stated that if the accused remains mute, it is unclear if he is a criminal.

[@debosmitachakraborty5201]

10/10 ma'am...For the 1st time....Thank you ma'am for your guidance

[@khushishivhare7020]

A two-member bench of Supreme Court granted a bail to CM Kejrival on money laundering charges . But soon after this ,CBI arrested him for 22 months prolong case that was suspected by Judge Bhuyan. As Judge said that it was too sudden to arrest CM Kejrival after bail immediately. CBI's responsibility is to keep it's investigations fair and not to act as a "caged parrot ". Thanks ma'am ❤

[@richakumari7935]

Today's descriptive When chief minister Arvind Kejriwal released a conditional bail in money laundering case by the court recently he was arrested by the CBI . Delhi's Deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia and Rashtra Samithi leader K.Kavitha also included a money laundering act. Mr Kejriwal released on conditional bail, justice Surya Kant and justice Ujjal Bhuyan also entered to bail but CBI wanted him back to the court but there was no need for a trial court. There is no need for CBI to arrest him for 22 months he questioned .

[@garimasinha2853]

A 2-member Supreme Court bench (Justices Surya Kanth and Ujjal Bhuyan) was divided on the legality of Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal's arrest in the Money laundering case. Justice Bhuyan raised concerns about: 1. Dubious timing of the arrest. 2. High Court's decision to send Kejriwal to the Trial Court 3. CBI interrogation just after the bail. Justice Bhuyan emphasized the importance of considering the merits of the case before making a decision.

[@bijayjha5631]

A two-member bench of supreme court granted bail to Delhi chief-Minister Arvind Kejriwal in Delhi excise policy case keeping in point that their view was totally different. Though, they considered that in granting bail there was no wrong in it and there was no need to send him back to trial court. However, justice Kant found that there was no violation of procedure in his arrest, as the CBI had approached the trial court for permission to question Mr.kejriwal, and lator on, to arrest him. Justice Bhuyan observed the timing of his arrest was 'suspect'. Justice BHUYAN also recalled precedents that say the existence of the power to arrest did not necessarily mean that there was a need to arrest.Justice Bhuyan observation touched upon the CBI's reputation. And few people mind set up become that the CBI's is government "caged parrot" and its investigation and probes cases arrest people in a high handed and biased manner. The judge has rightly emphasized the right of the accused to remain silent does not mean he/she is a victim. If the order of bail in Manish Sisodia case was a remainder to all judges that bail cannot be denied as a matter of punishment.

[@subhechchhabanerjee27]

Today's summary 》 Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has been granted bail by the Supreme Court which found his prolonged incarceration after his arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation in June in connection with the alleged liquor excise policy case. The two member bench of Supreme Court, Justice Surya kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan was questioned about his arrest by CBI on corruption cases when he was about to get bail from ED in money laundering case. Mr Bhuyan was also doubtful about the timing of arrest of Mr. Kejriwal. Justice Bhuyan also recalled CBI that power of arrest didn't means that they misused of it same in case of Mr Kejriwal. Justice also criticized CBI's reputation by mentioning them as "a caged parrot". The judges was said that if one is remain silent during investigation that doesn't mean one is culprit. In the end of CBI's role in the high profile cases, Court also should hear merit of cases properly before any verdict give. Thank you so much ma'am ❤

[@priyanshi_Dwivedi-g2y]

today's editorial Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal granted bail ( he had accused for liquor excise policy case ). After the extending period he was cusp on the bail and granted it from ED . The two mamber bench of Supreme court justice Surya kant ,justice ujjal bhuyan questioned about his arrestment by CBI on the bassis of corruption casses. they also recall that if CBI has a power of arrestment so didn't mean u r high handed and if suspected person is quite during the investigation so its not proved that he is criminal and crime done by him .They also criticised CBI by called them caged parrot . Thank u mam❤❤❤❤❤

[@0ldMonk_YT-9]

Thank you so much ma’am That fill in the blank idea was nice ❤❤❤❤❤

[@sahilverma5375]

Today's Editorial:- The two member bench of Supreme Court was divided on the legality of arrest of Delhi's chief minister Arwind Kejriwal in excise policy case. The two members were Justice Surya kanth and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Surya kanth was sedated with the CBI's arrest of Mr. Kejriwal but Justice Bhuyan raised some questions that denigrate CBI and its credibility in handling high profile cases. Mr bhuyan said that firstly the timing of arrest was itself dubious and HC's decision to send the accused Kejriwal to Trial Court. Secondly J.Bhuyan argued that arresting or taking remand of a person not answering CBI's questions did not mean that he is culprit it is hence the right of an individual to remain silent same in case of Mr. Kejriwal. Court should hear the merit of the before taking any decision. Hope Justice will be delivered after honest and proper investigation. Thank u mam❤

[@BrajeshBadal-h1q]

a two member bench of supreme court granted a bail to cm arvind kjrival in money loundary case after soon as cbi arrest him for courption charge . the both judges agree that there is no need of cbi to take Mr. KEJRival for trial court but justis surya kand said there is no mistake in processar of CBI , at the same time justis bhuyan sais timming of arrest is 'SUSPECT' there is no need of CBI to arrest Mr.Kejrival this soon he questioned on urgency to arrest him when he was on cusp relase in ED case ,justic also said that CBI have pawer to arrest that didn't mean nnesseccary to arrest he also said that all should seem that investigation held in baised manner if acussed is in silient mode that doesn't mean he is guilty.. thanku mam

[@PoojaChauhan-vj5tl]

Today's crux : Later, The CM of Delhi Arvind Kejriwal was accused under the money laundrey case . After the incarcination he was on the cusp of bail from ED , but suddenly after 22 months , CBI feel to arrest him . Justice Surya kant and Bhuyan both were entitled on the process of arrest while Jusctice Bhuyan questioned on the time of arrest was suspected . Both the Judiciary bodies are independent for scruitny but it seems that the CBI is the caged parrot of govt. as they do not want him to come out of the incarcination . Thank You Mam for your support 🧡 Today I TOPPED THE LEADERBOARD FOR THE FIRST TIME 😍😍😍

[@sandhyasinghverma3123]

Revision words..8/8 RC ques...8/10

[@ranjanapandey-rm1he]

Delhi Cheif minister Arvind Kejriwal was granted bail in the delhi money laundering case and he was arrested by the CBI on the Cups of bail by ED ( Enforcement Directorate) . Raised many questions on CBI arrest Timmings. Justice Bhuyan rightly said that "authority to an arrest did not mean that there was a need to arrest " why did CBI felt the need to arrest him at the edge of his bail, didnot feel the need to scrutinize in 22 months. Action of CBI itself cast shadow on his reputation , it is needed that CBI should scrutinize the cases in fair and just manner and should not cast itself as a caged parrot. Delhi Highcourt order is critize on rejecting bail to mr Kejriwal that he should first approach to trail court. The court should examine the merits of the case for bail any delay in the matter is resulted in prolonging his captivity. Thank u ma'am ❤❤

[@jasu4695]

10/10 thankyou mam❤

[@Nishtha-wn5gk]

The Supreme Court granted bail to Delhi's Chief Minister Mr. Kejriwal but after this the CBI arrested Mr Kejriwal due to money-laundering charges. Delhi’s Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K. Kavitha are also alleged in this case. Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan were saying that he was entitled to bail and that there was no need, to send him again in the trial court. Justice Bhuyan said that the CBI did not need to arrest him for 22 months when he was on the verge of being released from the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The judge has emphasised the accused have the right to remain silent and this doesn't mean that the investigating authorities arrest him for his non-cooperation behavior.

[@pavanabasavaraj6732]

The Supreme court with two member bench granted bail to Delhi Cheif Minister Arvind Kejriwal in the excise policy case. It was divided on the legality of his arrest by the CBI on Corruption as soon he was given regural bail. Justice Suryakant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan have consensus on the point that there was no need to arrest as they send him again to trial court. However,while Justice kant found no violation of procedure in his arrest as the CBI followed the correct procedure but Justice Bhuyan was not agree with the timing of his arrest as they were idle for 22 months and arrested him when he was on the edge of release. The CBI should be fair and unbiased, otherwise it may hamper its reputation. Both Judges noted that HighCourt should consider bail on merits, and one of them obresevred that delay in issuing notice and hearing the matter resulted in prolonged imprisonment.

[@ARTi_Dihari]

Cusp ( brink, verge, point) : the company is on the cusp closure due to loss. Stringent ( strict, severe ): My Father has made stringent rules for us. Incarceration ( imprisonment): his incarceration was prolonged due to delay in probe. High-handed (arbitrary, dictatorial): his behaviour was seen high-handed. Suspect ( doubtful, suspicious ): the suspect of the robbery is under the custody. Prolong ( lengthen, delay, extend ): the quarrel between staffs was prolonged. Precedent (example, model, guide): taking the precedent into account, he took a comprehensive decision. Disposition ( temperament, nature) : she resembles the disposition of leniency from her mother.

[@roshanigautam8543]

The CBI has arrested the Delhi Chief Minister, Arvind kejriwal in the money laundering case as soon as A two-member bench of the Supreme Court granted the bail to him in the Delhi excise policy case. Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan divided in their decision as justice surya kant did not feel violation against Mr. kejriwal's arrest but justice bhuyan had raised the objection on the timing of CM's arrest. Justice Bhuyan stated that CBI did not feel this decision before in 22 months. he said that CBI should be trustworthy for people on his decision and provide fair conclusion.

[@KannuChahuhan]

The two justice of supreme court that granted bail to CM Arvind Kejriwal was divided into legality. Both justice have different vistas, justice Surya Kant support the procedure of his arrest while justice Bhuyan observed that timing of arrest is the suspect. He advised CBI to do fair investigation.

[@ananyaagrahari444]

Today's Editorial : The curx of the article was two bench member of supreme court that granted bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind kejriwal in Delhi excise policy case along with CBl corruption changes Immediate after he was given bail in the case related to money laundering charges. Together with benefits given to the co accused partners including Delhi’s Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and Bhara -t Rashtra Samithi leader K.kavitha of Money Laundering Act, it was only a matter of time before ‐-------- Mr Kejriwal was also released on conditional bail. Now Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan ,one of them Justice kant views that their is no violation of his arrest as CBl approached but timing of arrest was suspect it creates question mark on credit worthiness and obligation of CBl, Here CBI act as Caged parrot of autocratic policians at time when Delhi Chief Minister Arvind kejriwal was cusp of realised in the ED (Enforcement Directorate) case. Both of judge's noted that High Court should considered bail on merits basis rather then following the deliberate approached to prolonging the duration of his incarceration.

[@RajanKumar-sl3il]

For the fair probe on the Kejriwal bail order and CBI conduct :- A two member bench of Supreme court granted bail to Delhi C.M Arvind Kejriwa. and that time CBI wanted to send him to the trail court against the money laundering case, this timing of his arrest was suspect. in this situation Justice Ujjal Bhuyan on the favor of Mr. Kejriwal and touched upon the CBI's reputation, to keep its investigation fair.

[@abhishekbhardwaj3057]

Later The Chief Minister of Delhi Arvind Kejriwal was accused under the money laundery case. After incarcenation he was on the cusp of bail from Supreme Court but suddenly cbi feels to take him to the trial court . Among the two - member bench of the supreme court one member Justice Bhuyan questioned on this action taken by cbi but another member Mr Kant found no violation in the procedure to arrest Mr Kejriwal. Justice Bhuyan observed that the timing of the arrest was dubious.

[@sumitchauhan1251]

Finally, a two-member bench of the Supreme Court approved the bail of the Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal in the Delhi Excise Case. This event occurred after the bail of Deputy Delhi CM Manish Sisodiya and the Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader under the Prevention of Laundering Act. The two members' names are Judge Surya Kant and Judge Ujjal Bhuyan. Both judges favor granting bail to Mr. Kejriwal as bail can not be denied based on punishment. Judge Bhyuan was skeptical at the time of the CBI's arrest of Mr Kejriwal. However, Judge Kant found no violation of procedure in his arrest. Judge Bhuyan also touched upon the CBI's reputation in this case. All scenarios lucidly show that there is a hind-handed influence and unfair investigation. Just getting bail from the ED case, the CBI arrested Mr Kejribal. This is all a part of a conspiracy against Mr. Kejriwal. CBI and Delhi High Court have to perform investigations fairly otherwise, it loses its goodwill. Thank you miss

[@anshukushwaha4031]

The Supreme Court granted bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal but CBI arrested him on corruption charges soon after he was given regular bail in connection with money laundering charges. The two member bench of supreme court, Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan were questioned about his arrest by CBI on corruption case when he was cusp of bail from ED in money laundering case. Mr.Bhuyan said that CBI has power to arrest but its doesn't mean that they missused of their power. Mr. Kejriwal Justice also criticised the reputation of CBI by mentioning them as 'a caged parrot '. The Judge was said that the if someone is remaining silent and no revert during investigation session it doesn't mean that one is real culprit.

[@SunitaDevi-gl2me]

A two - member bench of supreme Court was devided on legality of arresting Delhi CM Arvind kejriwal in case of exise policy case. Two justice mr. Surya kant and ujjal bhuyan said that he was entitled to bail but time of arresting was suspect. Ujjal bhuvan said that grant bail is not denied. Both bodies judiciary and CBI are indendent but CBI looks like a caged parrot of gov.

[@d_bharti05]

Crux of the article: CM of delhi,Mr Arvind kejrival was arrested for money laundering charges.After several months of incarcination,finally when he was on the cusp of release, CBI intervened and arrested him in corruption charges. The 2 member bench of supreme court was divided by the legality of arrest by CBI. One of the member, Justice Bhuyan highlited the fact that why the CBI did not feel the need to arrest him for 22 months,he also quentioned about the timing of arrest by CBI and also purport that why his silence was considerd wrong which result in keeping the suspect in prison. From all the connecting clues it can be inferred that these actions were done in order to increase his incarceration period.Long story short bail cannot be denied as a matter of punishment.This judgement will act as reminder to CBI about its devoir to keep the investigation a fair deal.

[@meenakshi3560]

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal bail on the money laundering case was granted by the two-member bench of supreme court. CBI investigated the case of this corruption charges accused on Arvind Kejriwal. Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K. Kavitha was also stringent under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. This time again CBI wanted to send him back to the trial court for the bail. The timing of his arrest was 'suspect' and the case was prolonged by the authority. It was not needed to arrest of 22 months by the CBI but Mr. Kejriwal was on the cusp of ED. Bail should be granted by proper investigate and on the merit basis.

[@_pankurajpoot_]

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal was accused in money londering case. this case arraign on deputy CM Delhi also. In this case , two judges of high court share there prospective about CM Kejriwal 's incaceration .

[@SupriyaKumari-bl4ig]

The two justice of Supreme Court that granted bail to Delhi CM Arvind kejriwal in the case of connection with money laundering charges. Many questions was raised on the CBI arrest timings when kejriwal was on the cusp of release in the ED. Justice Bhuyan said that the timing of his arrest was suspect and there no need to arrest him when he was on the cusp of release in the ED and also observed touched upon the CBI reputation. No one would disagree the view that the CBI should strive the notion of a caged parrot. The order of bail was a reminder to all judges that bail cannot be denied as a matter of punishment . There is also some criticism when Delhi High Court order to rejecting bail to Mr. Kejriwal.

[@vaishnavigupta1388]

CRUX OF TODAY'S EDITORIAL Supreme Court granted bail to Delhi CM Mr. Arvind Kejiriwal for his previous case, but at the time of bail CBI arrested Mr. Arvind Kejiriwal in reference to this, the bench of Supreme Court said that CBI has the power to arrest but this does not mean that he arrest anyone at any time without merit and probe of the case and if anyone is silent it does not mean he is suspect and the agencies will not propensity the case in the way that he is the culprit.

[@ANSHIKA-b2f]

When Chief minister of Delhi Arvind Kejriwal released on conditional bail in money laundering case by the supreme court after that recently, he arrested by CBI. It looked like intentionally and timely did by CBI. Justice Surya kant and justice ujjal bhuyan said that after entitling bail by ED why CBI arrested him in 22 months , it is questionable on CBI reputation. CBI needs to do his work fairly not to " a caged parrot" of notion . The Delhi HC already rejected Mr. Kejriwal bail and approached him for the trail court first and threshold movement CBI arrested him. Both judges observed that whole incident dragging longer intentionally.

[@microworld-z9e]

10/9

[@loose_cannon_30]

The two-member bench of supreme court hast split in two parts on the arrest of Delhi CM Arvind kejriwal by CBI just after getting the conditional bail from ED in money laundring case. After two month of being in ED's custody Mr Kejriwal just got conditional bail. Two member bench of supreme court Justice Surya Kant and Justice Ujwal Bhuyan have conflict of opinion in there statement on kejriwal's arrest by CBI. Justice Kant say the arrest by CBI is totaly fair as they approach to trail court first for the warrant and the goes to arrest Mr. Kejriwal, but justice Bhuyan questioned about the timing of the CBI and their procedures, what are they doing since 22 months when he was in ED's custody. Not only Kejriwal but also Manish Sisodiya and K Smitha were both put under more stringent charges of ED in money laundering case which is also questionable. Court also order CBI to keep the investigation away from politics and stop doing high handel the suspect it will only damage their image.

[@tripathijaadu99]

Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal releasd on bail .But the two member bench divided on the legality of his arrest. CBI arrested MR Kejriwal when he was on the cusp of releasing on bail in money laundering case .CBI actioned made this statement true that it is a caged parrot .Supreme court said that bail should be granted in any case .

[@shivanibhardwaj2108]

Cusp to be banker☺️

[@ariaaariaa-o4r]

Maam English subtitles bhi add kijiye please

[@ArtiKumari-mz8ln]

Ma'am humko vocabulary samjha nahi aa raha hai

[@MyVibes1609]

Yr math or current affairs k liye koi ache KZbin teacher k bare m bta do

[@chouhan3508]

Quant ke liye shiddharth sir - 10 am or CA ke liye aashish goutam sir - morning 7 am

[@MyVibes1609]

@@chouhan3508 thanku

[@ariaaariaa-o4r]

You are making my image questionable

[@Its_SanjanaVerma]

Yes you should question your image how can a person have so many judgements on this 🤷‍♀️ None of the comment on the video have any problem with mam , video, thumbnail or anything, except you Booooo!!

[@ariaaariaa-o4r]

@@Its_SanjanaVerma 😆 maam giving vocabs to make sentence So That's why I'm doing comment 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 I think it's misunderstanding

[@ariaaariaa-o4r]

Thumbnail change kr dijiye bahot jyada colourful hai