The Hartman-Grobman Theorem, Structural Stability of Linearization, and Stable/Unstable Manifolds

  Рет қаралды 20,414

Steve Brunton

Steve Brunton

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 21
@undisclosedmusic4969
@undisclosedmusic4969 2 жыл бұрын
"It requires technical language but let me draw you a picture to show you what I mean" are the words of every great teacher in the world.
@pongballchannel
@pongballchannel Жыл бұрын
These videos are PHENOMENAL! This is exactly what I needed for my research, thank you so much 🙏
@nikkatalnikov
@nikkatalnikov 2 жыл бұрын
Hartman-Grobman theorem... my respect, professor!
@hoseinzahedifar1562
@hoseinzahedifar1562 2 жыл бұрын
Great lecture... Especially the last seconds about the term y = \phi(x) which might be what and how to be calculated...Thank you very much... I've never known about this interesting theory...
@guuspalmero
@guuspalmero Жыл бұрын
Best explanation, so easy but also so practical👌🏻
@neyhmor
@neyhmor 7 ай бұрын
It is not easy. He just makes it look so easy (and I mean it as a compliment)
@MrHaggyy
@MrHaggyy 2 жыл бұрын
This is excellent stuff and really helps to illustrate stability. Add some numbers and margins to it and you can engineer quite neat systems that your controller will like. So please do more lectures about these pictures and how to increase or break stability.
@bonbonpony
@bonbonpony Жыл бұрын
13:44 That's what I'm interested in the most: how can we find equations for those stable manifolds and closed orbits. I see an example of that at the end of the video, but I don't quite follow where everything came from. 14:21 So what was the nonlinear differential equation that this system originated from? If x' = dx/dt, then substituting it to the 2nd equation gives me d²x/dt² + dx/dt = x² which is nonlinear all well, but then what should I do with the first equation? The form of the 2nd-order non-linear equation that I got from the 2nd equation doesn't seem to depend on the first equation, so I clearly must be doing something wrong here :q How should I involve the 1st equation into play? 15:44 But a trajectory doesn't necessarily have to be a function of one coordinate in terms of the other. What then? Would a parametrization work equally well?
@Music-qm4pw
@Music-qm4pw 8 ай бұрын
Very good!!!!
@CISMD
@CISMD 8 ай бұрын
A video on equilibria of equivariant systems would be cool
@seslocrit9365
@seslocrit9365 2 жыл бұрын
The axis (in the last example) can be considered as position vs. velocity.
@juliangomez8162
@juliangomez8162 2 жыл бұрын
Steve, please tell us about what is a manifold, and the "manifold theorem".
@Applefarmery
@Applefarmery 2 жыл бұрын
Will you also cover the center manifold theorem?
@shocklab
@shocklab 2 жыл бұрын
Hi Steve, these are truly wonderful lectures. A very naive question: A stable node is also, as far as I'm aware, structurally stable. In two dimensions it has two real eigenvalues, therefore it would seem to fulfil the definition you give for hyperbolicity, but it does not have a stable and an unstable manifold - ie. it's not a saddle. Does hyperbolicity hold independent of the relative signs of the real parts of the eigenvalues? The same question holds for any eigenvalues of the Jacobian for which there also exist imaginary parts.
@SSNewberry
@SSNewberry 2 жыл бұрын
The proof is not hard but requires some mind-expanding.
@dharshan272
@dharshan272 Жыл бұрын
I think there was a mistake in calling it the stable manifold. The points on the manifold should approach a point. Here the manifold you drew would be referred to as an unstable manifold as the emerge from a point. At least, that's all the references I've been reading says.
@mmaroti
@mmaroti 2 жыл бұрын
If I understood it correctly, then a spiral in fixed point, e.g. with eigen value -1+i, would also be preserved locally to the non-linear case, right?
@MrHaggyy
@MrHaggyy 2 жыл бұрын
Take a look at the proof for this question. Hartman Grobman is derived from the Jacobian and eigenvalues of a system and works in theory if there is no 0 realpart or repeated eigenvalue. In practice, you need quite stable or unstable eigenvalues. The more you zoom in the smaller your realparts can be, but the area your linearisation holds get`s smaller too.
@animeshjain8932
@animeshjain8932 2 жыл бұрын
blue diagram at 6:07 looks sus (just joking don't take too seriously)
@JuanFernandez-hd7de
@JuanFernandez-hd7de 2 жыл бұрын
Great video, as always. Specially the last part where the equation for the stable manifold Is derived. How would you derive the unstable on? It seens much more cumbersome....
@mohammadabdollahzadeh268
@mohammadabdollahzadeh268 2 жыл бұрын
Hi dear Dr, please make a tutorial about how to design adaptive dynamic pid controller in matlab Im looking forward to hearing from you Sincerely Mohammad
Drawing Phase Portraits for Nonlinear Systems
26:01
Steve Brunton
Рет қаралды 44 М.
Интересно, какой он был в молодости
01:00
БЕЗУМНЫЙ СПОРТ
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН
If people acted like cats 🙀😹 LeoNata family #shorts
00:22
LeoNata Family
Рет қаралды 41 МЛН
Don’t Choose The Wrong Box 😱
00:41
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 50 МЛН
Phase Portrait for Double Well Potential
16:04
Steve Brunton
Рет қаралды 14 М.
Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems: Overview
29:31
Steve Brunton
Рет қаралды 163 М.
2x2 Systems of ODEs: Saddle Points and Instability
27:43
Steve Brunton
Рет қаралды 20 М.
Nonlinear Systems: Fixed Points, Linearization, & Stability
29:08
Dr. Shane Ross
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Linearizing Nonlinear Differential Equations Near a Fixed Point
23:28
What is a "Linear" Differential Equation?
19:15
Steve Brunton
Рет қаралды 28 М.
6.2  Stable and Unstable Equilibrium Points
21:16
UCLA modeling class
Рет қаралды 10 М.
412 06 Hartman Grobman Theorem
13:21
Hermann Riecke
Рет қаралды 1,9 М.
Интересно, какой он был в молодости
01:00
БЕЗУМНЫЙ СПОРТ
Рет қаралды 3,5 МЛН