What are Quarks? ▶ kzbin.info/www/bejne/nIizp5t8mKmde9U
@michaelcharlesthearchangel4 жыл бұрын
The Super Entity is the conscience Galaxy. The Galaxy is alive & manifest physicAl as a multidimensionAl Super Body.
@SpotterVideo Жыл бұрын
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. ------------------------ String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. The model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .
@scandalv38994 жыл бұрын
I'm a Japanese student and study elementary particle physics. This is very interesting video that l've watched so far. Thank you.
@aalekhya69994 жыл бұрын
The start was hilarious 😂
@shehnaz93944 жыл бұрын
Which book was sir carrying
@sunilkumarb4370 Жыл бұрын
😂
@zeeshanhaider1131 Жыл бұрын
😂
@ripz75628 ай бұрын
@@shehnaz9394quantum mechanics by Zettillie
@induprabhapant68374 жыл бұрын
Omg sir🤣🤣 I was actually thinking of it as a video on Buddhism🙏🙏🙏 Great video as always 🙏🙏thankyou so much sir 🙏👌👍
@adamcummings208 ай бұрын
Not that other videos on this topic are bad, but I love your production quality, and your delivery. Also the start was very funny. Thanks!
@AditiShahaniMPH4 жыл бұрын
Loved that I searched something and my old professor shows up in the top videos!!
@sarathadevi70433 жыл бұрын
Really very superb sir. I tried to know about the quarks, I couldn't understand. But today I have cleared known all the things. Very very thank you sir. Salute you
@abhigyan752 жыл бұрын
Dear Sir, your presentation is very nice. But I want to add a few things about it: 1. At 5.13, you mentioned the eightfold way came from the eight baryons. But the fact is that, in SU(3) symmetry, we have 3*3=9-1=8 generators. That is why the eightfold way comes. 2. The particles are not arranged in a geometrical manner, but whenever we put them in Y (hypercharge)-I3 (Isospin 3rd component) weight diagram according to their Y and I3 values the geometrical shape automatically evolves. 3. Quarks were proposed because, in search of the fundamental 3 generators of SU(3) symmetry, it was needed to conceptualise three such particles which can generate the other particles.
@DC-zi6se Жыл бұрын
Correct, the Y vs. I_3, i.e. Hypercharge vs Isospin method is definitely more intuitive. Btw, for anyone interested, Y (x-axis) = Baryon Number + Strangeness Number I_3 (y-axis) = Q - Y/2
@paulwary11 ай бұрын
@@DC-zi6se Has it been shown (eg by exhaustion) that there is no better or more compact way of generating these symmetries than the quark hypothesis?
@sujitbaruah45364 жыл бұрын
Your mode of imparting knowledge is excellent
@knowledgeseeker22664 жыл бұрын
Sir please make a video on SU(2) and SU(3) group concept associated with this topic
@arzooakhtar52254 жыл бұрын
Start of your video is interesting and I also like your way of explaining things. Things become more and more easy for me. You are just amazing sir. keep it up sir with the blessings of God
@imfermion206 Жыл бұрын
kasher koor ?
@ScienceAcademy4 жыл бұрын
The starting concept was tremendous!!! Aims to cover all your videos. Just 1 request would you plz make a series lectures on statistical mechanics.
@gangamadappally4 жыл бұрын
Your lectures are awesome and very interactive..also understands well.. thankful for these fantastic lectures..
@yours.anurag2 жыл бұрын
Sir, a sincere Thank you for providing us with the best and highest quality content on physics 🙏.. Please keep making similar amazing videos.😊
@dontmindmeimjustchilling Жыл бұрын
omg at first i genuinely thought you were going to combine buddhism with particle physics in a metaphorical way or something, i was so ready for it lolol
@subhamdas66994 жыл бұрын
wonderfull sir... You are amazing... This course is helping me alot to understand the particle physics course of bsc.. Thank you sir..
@vaishalisharma32494 жыл бұрын
Sir I request you to talk about role of SU2 and SU3 matrices in particle physics.And bound states of quarks or quarkonium.
@ksbakkiyaraj14634 жыл бұрын
Yes me too
@aamirbashir88794 жыл бұрын
Yes
@abhisheka81184 жыл бұрын
yeah. I too would be delighted have a video about it
@ajaykori80064 жыл бұрын
Yes, I'm also in.... I also want to know about SU(2) and SU(3) groups and how they are used for fundamental interaction and fundamental paricles' classification.
@vaishalisharma32494 жыл бұрын
Yes.....i hope sir will help us.
@Jatin.Mudgil074 жыл бұрын
Dear Das Sir your videos have made nuclear physics very easy...♥♥
@spidervait54202 жыл бұрын
Brilliantly explanation of complex ideas, and uses visual aids effectively. Thanks for making this helpful video.
@redsky14332 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your very clear explanation and diagrams. Well done!
@dineshupreti85172 жыл бұрын
your explanation is just beyond ordinary. Watching you from Nepal.
@dipjyotikalita48245 ай бұрын
Best teacher of Nuclear Physics❤
@bookspa_49422 жыл бұрын
yours new starting way is fabulous
@subhadipsahoo78584 жыл бұрын
Great Explanation Sir. You are an Inspiration, Thank you so much Sir Note: Sir it would be better if you would provide an i link to your referred video
@debjeetmishra98764 жыл бұрын
Sir please suggest book for particle physics
@souvikkumarnaskar36474 жыл бұрын
Best approach for understanding❤
@rimaghosh99043 жыл бұрын
Super explanation
@jagdeep50834 жыл бұрын
Periodic table analogy is great
@DaniElotito14 жыл бұрын
The intro 😂 Great video
@saremraves87163 жыл бұрын
Vaah Guruji mauj krdi... 😝😝
@ravithejasringeri44264 жыл бұрын
Great work Sir. Thank you very much. your videos are very much appreciated.
@yogeshwarijagadishprasadbh29622 жыл бұрын
Super sir...I was too late to watch this video. Sir, can we make a table of elementary particles like periodic table?
@internetperson34514 жыл бұрын
Thanks @For the Love of Physics, explained it very clearly, and funny!
@nabanitapaul18653 жыл бұрын
Explanation was very clear . Nabanita Paul .Ex _lecturer Physics.
@kavitachauhan13302 жыл бұрын
Best explanations of every topics..👍👌👌
@mahendramosalpuri89284 жыл бұрын
Thanks you very much sir your are the best lots of love and care I totally impress your teaching
@ajaykori80064 жыл бұрын
Respected sir, I really want to know about SU(2) and SU(3) groups and how they are used for fundamental interaction and fundamental paricles' classification. Can you please make a video on that or give me any suggestions about any books to read about it.
@sumantakumarmajhi53234 жыл бұрын
Me also same problem
@irshadhussain1626fair3 жыл бұрын
hi, sir ,can you give me hints about effective potential chemical potential and contact potential?
@4orsesheron9974 жыл бұрын
Ah, that's (when) we see edges in our instruct. That's beyond con-struck. Then T's and S's. See how the duo fit? Alike tree and snake.
@aurindammondal3 жыл бұрын
Can you recommend any book/article from which we can study this "Eightfold way"??
@F.A_123454 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir.. 🙏 you are great from pak 🇵🇰🇵🇰
@sanjeevmaurya46374 жыл бұрын
Sir can you make a video, how you make videos like you for teaching.
@rupabasu42614 жыл бұрын
Are you a theoretical physicist or experimental physicist?
@albertmagician861311 ай бұрын
It is appalling that no mention is made of scattering experiments that suggests 1/3 electron charge is present in atom nuclei.
@treeytbot Жыл бұрын
What type of detectors are used to detect these particles??
@Gatewaysclassesupsc4 жыл бұрын
Nice deserve more subscriber
@tamannasharma7413 Жыл бұрын
Sir can you please tell about the best book regarding particle physics.
@harry-ho9ti4 жыл бұрын
Sir can u make a lecture on BCS theory pls. I have a iit interview on july.
@ankitmishra27234 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir please keep on in good frequency🙏
@nayesha7493 Жыл бұрын
Very nice explanation Sir.🙂🌸
@mrfinesse4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the presentation that was easy to understand. Are all the Hadrons shown (in the groups of 8, 9 and 10) unstable - other than a proton? How can a quark / anti-quark pair exist?
@FortheLoveofPhysics4 жыл бұрын
Proton is the most stable hadron. Rest all have varying lifetimes, from 14mins of a free neutron to 10^-24 s for resonance particles. Quark-antiquark having different flavour exist for ~microseconds, while quark-antiquark for similar flavour annihilate as soon as they are formed with life of around 10^-17s
@darshanaborah3423 жыл бұрын
Very helpful video sir 😊
@ammarbayyari3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant opening
@profksmmentor45804 жыл бұрын
sir please make complete lecture series on quantum physics
@imfermion206 Жыл бұрын
Aaj patta chala ki, "I ll talk of this in some other video" is takiya-kalam..😄
@universal8453 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation
@Sandhaan1084 жыл бұрын
Superb lecture 👌
@subratadhara74112 жыл бұрын
Thank you.. Very much helpful
@sciencephysicsandnature60413 жыл бұрын
Nice sir
@neha.singhal4 жыл бұрын
at 11:02 lambda(0) should have strangeness number be -1? as it is uds
@FortheLoveofPhysics4 жыл бұрын
That's a delta particle (udd)
@neha.singhal4 жыл бұрын
@@FortheLoveofPhysics Thanks sir
@soutikadak20504 жыл бұрын
The guys who disliked this video they don't understand particle physics.
@che-maticschemistrymathema70444 жыл бұрын
Yes🤣🤣👍👍
@NScott45 Жыл бұрын
why are people having a hard time accepting fractional charges? It just means the charge of an electron is not fundamental. In units of down quark charge, a down quark is -1, an up quark is +2 and an electron is -3. See? No fractions
@LemoUtan3 жыл бұрын
@17:45 should Sigma+ be uus and not uud (same as p)?
@jacobvandijk65252 жыл бұрын
Yes, you are right. No s in the top-row, one s in the middle row and two s in bottom row
@debjeetmishra98763 жыл бұрын
Sir please say which book you use
@skmizanurislam50804 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 great sense of humor sir ❤️
@FortheLoveofPhysics4 жыл бұрын
Thanku :)
@samuelnarciso13 жыл бұрын
after watching him for so long time I started having a crush on him.
@BOPFASHION88703 жыл бұрын
😅
@ajaysauravminhas11914 жыл бұрын
Ab to sir apna sa ho gya he aapke sath 😅😁❤️
@bphyfrnd6257 Жыл бұрын
Superb sir
@krishnakumarsah6324 жыл бұрын
Do you use Griffiths particle physics
@sumantakumarmajhi53234 жыл бұрын
Sir please can u uploading some video based on unitary symmtery SU (2),SU(3),concept of I-spin,u-spin,v-spin please sir
@arkabhattacharjee39164 жыл бұрын
That is Zettili's book of QM at 00:42?
@FortheLoveofPhysics4 жыл бұрын
Yup
@HimmatBording4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video sir...
@ajaysauravminhas11914 жыл бұрын
OMG 😂 starting was awesome 😂😂
@rajkumardas97372 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir 😊
@srabanisamanta15994 жыл бұрын
Sir please give a vedio on RAMAN effect.
@kinzaWajid. Жыл бұрын
Well explained
@ishwarram71784 жыл бұрын
सर हिन्दी में क्वांटम भौतिकी के लिए सबसे अच्छी किताब कौनसी है? [हिन्दी]please
@gauravhasija833 жыл бұрын
Sir, Does their exsist any particle with +2 or -2 charge? 🙏
@DrDeuteron3 жыл бұрын
delta ++. it's uuu.
@jiteshpatel12962 жыл бұрын
Please Sir nuclear physics Ke liye reference book bataiye
@michaeladjei51744 жыл бұрын
Sir please suggest a book for me on Elementary Particle Physics
@Sanctum_sepra3 жыл бұрын
David J Griffith's book is good
@ratnajayanti50564 жыл бұрын
Sir can I get your lecture ppt or pdf
@sylvainmonteiro3 ай бұрын
I think that the tenth particle, we find it in another calculates which and the logo of the triforce by calculating the 4 triangles of the triforce, we cannot calculate the middle triangle in activation🤠we must imagine the other quartz puts pressure on the middle triangle triforce and we find the tenth which and the activation, the triforce and like the sierpinski fractal triangle, maybe it's the key to everything. or can be seen like this ✡