Elon Musk on Solar 😱😱😱

[@dinosspyro5640]

Elon: you can power the world... Reporter: Ah yes, California

[@brianrasmussen2956]

‘In Europe?’ Erhm, apparently we don’t get sun over here…..

[@dinosspyro5640]

@@brianrasmussen2956 ye us Europeans borrow the sun from America

[@takingafatdump]

she’s an oil lobbyist what do you expect.

[@L.C.Sweeney]

Pretty sure it's because there was context missing from this clip

[@hugo122221]

she can’t agree much with Elon coz she knows this for long time but the news is control and ruled my the people that control the world

[@FielValeryRTS]

Elon: Using kilometres US: *questions existence*

[@jacobfrancis635]

He's from South Africa

[@BoopSnootAndTroubleshoot]

You can tell them that things aren't as bad as in the US outside of the US, and they will still believe they are the "representation of the world's prime", when they are further from.

[@Assassinsam353]

He’s using the best and correct units.

[@Automaticguns1]

@@Assassinsam353 i prefer a combination of both. theres some shit in the metric system that's hella confusing same with imperial for me metric speed and measurement for length confuses the fuck out of me but the weight system is pretty simple. Also depending on which one your taught when your a child goes into how easy or hard the other one is to understand when your an adult

[@toosters]

Atleast he isnt using the US "liberal" with their stupid feets.... I mean im p sure its to make them look creative

[@chooch5728]

Spoken like a true salesman.

[@ChiralityPracticality]

Silver tongued ponzie schemer

[@ansonellis443]

Always exaggerate the product or you may not get a sale

[@PolishLoLGamer]

He is telling truth, but we need batteries

[@realDys.]

​@@PolishLoLGamer from China😂😂😂

[@ChristopherGray00]

@@realDys. batteries dont only exist in china...

[@N9mber]

Certain areas can be powered solely with solar panels. I could imagine Nations like Spain or Italy being able to do it rather than Sweden or the UK.

[@stripclub-di5fr]

This is why the Middle East is the future

[@N9mber]

@@stripclub-di5fr They definitely have the best geography for Solar with large spaces of desert/arid regions that are sparsely populated. It makes sense economically and politically to be an Arabian gulf or North African nation where solar can power alongside Oil & gas.

[@m.t-thoughts8919]

They could use more efficients once and buy if from places that can use less efficient panels but at a larger scale. Lets also not forget geothermal energy and wind.

[@lightningwolf2460]

She has traveled all over the world, to both California AND Europe.

[@HansLaros]

Roflol!

[@S1893-0]

To be honest I think she has a fair point. There’s way more solar potential in California than in the rest of the world in general. In Germany as example during winter you get 4-5hours of sun. And that’s still ignoring that the highest energy needs take place when the sun goes down again. As long we don’t have way better storage capabilities using solar alone is fairy tale… Doing the math with wind makes it way better already. That’s why gas is valuable right now. Compared to nuclear you can fire up the gas plant whenever you want while nuclear would have to run 24/7 effectively creating energy that is worthless during half the day…

[@otozinclus3593]

@@S1893-0 Yet, germany gets 21% of its energy out of Solar. In the USA its 3%

[@S1893-0]

@@otozinclus3593 well that’s because there’s more infrastructure in Germany…. Also during summer you have upto 10h of Sun which is great for Solar. Just saying that it’s not like that all year and that you need solution for the part of the year where there’s energy missing

[@doucefrance5481]

While she s dindian

[@wiggieben]

Hi from Scotland ... this 'sun' he's talking about... tell me more ? 🤔

[@paddypoolfc3579]

☝️🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Light00000]

😂😂🍻

[@alphabetagamma4142]

Don't worry about it... It's a lie. NASA made it up to control the world. Elon musk is in on it.

[@AhsokaTanoTheWhite]

It's the thing in the sky that tried to kill us last month!

[@ryand6607]

Hi from America here, it's this big bright thing in the sky that makes plants and veggies and trees grow, it rises in the east and sets in the west and if your white it can burn the shit out of you if you don't use sunscreen, peaceout Scotland

[@daveanthonyvillasista6987]

clouds, rain and night: "bonjour"

[@kaijen2688]

Guess you never heard of batteries.

[@daveanthonyvillasista6987]

​@@kaijen2688 super capacitors would be better than batteries. But yeah bonjour

[@nightmist7977]

Solar alliance my friend.

[@PhysicsViolator]

Monocrystaline black panels bon journo …

[@aletrip642]

Mechanical flywheel batteries?

[@quantumchang4410]

The problem is not with solar panels but with nighttime and a cloudy week of energy storage with batteries.

[@Xtasy99]

Now, imagine nuclear plants with a flat top full of solar panels. That's efficiency.

[@David-bi6lt]

🤣🤣🤣📛🆘

[@xsbbx5191]

Well that can be cool but it useless since the nuclear plants makes less than solar panels, you should make two solar panels

[@Xtasy99]

@@xsbbx5191 it is invaluable to use 100% of the land for solar panel, and anything beneath the solar plant is currently dead land, so let's think about it the other way. "Let's make nuclear plants beneath solar plants to make use of the dead land"

[@BigJavWJ]

@@xsbbx5191 you literally can't 😂

[@jasontera1195]

That hole is there for a reason 😂

[@onionrings1098]

Elon: "The world" Interviewer: "Europe?"

[@loupe500]

Maybe she meant Jupter’s moon Europe lmao

[@submarinemagnet7965]

Yo world tours typically only go in US and Europe and still call it a "World Tour" 😂🤡

[@luigins]

she think the whole world is just USA 😂😂

[@gabrielparedes6458]

Actually she’s saying Europe cuz there’s a big difference in size between this two, when u look to Europe we don’t see as many fat plans that fits for solar panels as in us

[@cesarcapersii9833]

They should have solar panels set in a very high area of the sun ☀️ and they energy should be transferred

[@deonfleming5198]

Nuclear power plant life expectancy 100yrs. Its clean energy. Solar life expectancy 10yrs. Cant be recycled

[@newyorker641]

100 years is maybe a bit too optimistic but still in the realistic range and 10 years for the solar panels a bit low but you are generally right, solar can never replace the role of nuclear energy.

[@librajedi]

Until we get a few hundred years down the road and we have piles of nuclear material to dispose of, but thats not on us or our kids. Let Skynet figure it out.

[@ygrittesnow1701]

@@newyorker641 All of course will be rendered moot if and when they crack the fusion code.

[@ubbisoft]

100 years is total bs. The cost is much higher. Solar waste can be and is recycled. You should learn to read any even remotely scientific source and not just blabber out your false intuition.

[@ammaeaar]

Can be! There is a company trying to get their algae pannels in the market that can be used as fertilizers. It is way more enviromentally friendly than any power plant with his huge use of cooling waters, machinery, waste and machines to contain waste etc...

[@migmigjohnson9351]

Hey Elon, this is Pedro, one of your chief engineer. You know that one time we were talking about nuclear power plants and I say something about solar panel? Well I mean Alien solar panels. The ones we have now will take up the space of 50 nuclear power plants. Please don’t fire me. Pedro.

[@NicholasHerriot]

I worked at the nuclear power plant at Dunganess in the UK. There is a 5km exclussion zone around the plant since it's near Folkestone. Now do your calculations.... 😮

[@Ocious]

*Anyone else randomly just started watching shorts and now it’s just a everyday thing?*

[@Aaron-zh4kj]

YEEEESSS. It was a pretty sudden and unsubtle transition recently. How did it happen?

[@dextrion7259]

No

[@shannond1467]

Yep

[@steveadams7592]

Guilty...to the point my wife gets annoyed at me. She laughs at the same things I do so it's not all bad.

[@michaelbelcher4284]

And here I thought it was just me that has gotten trapped in this loop.

[@basgreiner1350]

I would love to see him build a $44 billion solar power park, instead of buying twitter!

[@championx1]

Rather have power problems than world full of leftist views due to discrimination of the right.

[@theflippingcoin975]

You are not allowed to do that. The council that oversees the energy production and distribution won’t let that happen. For example search the biggest solar panel project by India was shut down by international management.

[@chinogodinez]

@@theflippingcoin975 💰

[@justinchavez582]

You do it

[@randyvillegas9413]

@@theflippingcoin975 that's fucking wild wtf

[@CaptainPupu]

Finland: 6 months of no sun

[@techteam3111]

Really?

[@cassk9999]

Daylight is enough to store and save energy not just direct sunlight

[@CaptainPupu]

@cassk9999 in Finland, in the winter the only light you get is 6 hours of daylight. Don't be so naive son. Daylight won't be enough to cover your energy cost. You need nice sun for that. Even with the sun, if your house is not fully covered w electricity, you still might pay the electric company. Solar is very good and very nice. For people in Spain and Florence. Not in Finland.

[@cassk9999]

@CaptainPupu 6 hours of daylight will give you some charge after that you can run a small 600cc engine like a maruti suzuki and a motor generator which uses very little petrol for another 2 hours and charge up your batteries that's enough for a small consumption to stay of a grid for most 1-2 persons needs

[@CaptainPupu]

@cassk9999 not for a family of 4 though. Again, solar is nice in the summer and in Spain, not in Finland.

[@scottclark3139]

Nuclear power is the cleanest, most reliable solution

[@ashhooper4702]

And the safest per GWh

[@hamishreid8791]

And works at night too!

[@Shit_Bird]

Except for when yknow it breaks down and causes horrific devastation to entire cities like Chernobyl and Fukushima

[@user-hk1on7dw2s]

Nuclear waste blinking in the corner

[@thehamster2301]

Chernobyl...."hold my beer".😂

[@hyunkwak6759]

Can we get smarter people with smarter questions to interview Musk

[@mowlessbeemore2107]

Probably not.

[@ekatmafullington4357]

​@@mowlessbeemore2107 women ☕

[@ChiralityPracticality]

Like how he couldn't run his failed venture "SolarCity". Which was a small neighbourhood that was a failure, then he used Tesla stocks to bail himself out. He also loves government bailouts regularly

[@dreamsister6339]

@@ekatmafullington4357’s not that it’s a woman…… ? I’m a woman and even I thought she sounded a lil ignorant tbh….. so it’s not that she’s a woman…. I guess she was saying Cali and Europe bc those two places have different weather.. one with lots of sun and the other less sun

[@ekatmafullington4357]

@@dreamsister6339 ok 👌😊

[@levyata8964]

"The sun? In California? I believe that but in Europe? The sun? That's impossible"

[@Flakz911]

Known fact that Europe doesnt get sunlight

[@meat981]

@@Flakz911 yeah but Europe is literally an entire continent, much bigger than California. Doesn't matter that it gets less per solar panel when its about having many solar panels per area

[@vegar20]

@@meat981 He’s speaking more to having different areas around the world generating energy which have higher direct sunlight and then transporting that energy to other areas with less sunlight

[@de0509]

For thousand kilometer power transmission people can use High voltage DC current

[@jodensmith5093]

Solar panels today can get bits of power from the full moon at night. Not much but it’s measurable. They don’t need direct sunlight

[@ACorzo]

The world is ALREADY powered by the sun.

[@Hydrog666]

Lay off the fentanyl

[@rudagamer9589]

Elon: Just by using land area Me: what could he mean other than land area? Freeman Dyson: Bonjour

[@jd01665]

He meant using your land area, not his.

[@HarveyG06]

Elon: “The world!” Reporter: “California?” Elon: “The world!!” Reporter: “Europe??” Elon: “The world!!!” Reporter: “The world???” Elon: “How many times I gotta say this shit?!”

[@rocknkese9075]

Does she know how small Europe is in relation to the whole world, my goodness the sad reality of the western education system is absolutely staggering.

[@simon_roy]

Dio : Za Warudo

[@saraeissa4954]

Because he’s wrong and she’s right but Elon fanboys are too busy making misogynistic jokes to take her seriously

[@purpleXpotion]

Reporter: If it’s true that ‘the world’ can be powered (as we know it) using only solar panels.. then WHY are people experiencing ROLLING BLACKOUTS whenever this is applied on a smaller scale? Elon: Because people ‘waste’ too much, but _my_ fairy tales are possible. And furthermore, if everyone would just stop demanding harmful houses, (let alone power _inside_ them) & lay directly under the sun for warmth all day (like a plant) ..then _I_ wouldn’t even have to ‘waste _my_ energy, harming the environment’ to generate ‘toxic panels’ for these schmucks. You see, ☝️😌 Any society that’s not lying completely dormant (ahem, _dead)_ is riddled with pollution & toxicity.. which is harmful & evil to the environment. Reporter: *Typical aspiring dictator logic.* 💀 NEXT!

[@alsalazar6069]

@@rocknkese9075 usa éducation system staggering *

[@superchargedpetrolhead]

Lie with confidence and the world will believe you.... The largest solar farm in the world is in India "the Badhla solar farm" which occupies 14,000 acres and produces 2.25 GW of electricity. The largest nuclear plant is "kashiwazaki kariwa nuclear plant" in Japan which occupies 1000 acres and produces 7.9 GW of electricity.

[@SympatheticArsenal]

A *nuclear* plant in Japan? They never learn.

[@matthewpauls2498]

@@SympatheticArsenal lmao bruh

[@superchargedpetrolhead]

@@SympatheticArsenal less people have died in a nuclear plant related meltdowns or accidents than every other form of energy production including solar.

[@SympatheticArsenal]

@@superchargedpetrolhead Oh I know, it's just that there's a certain degree of irony about Japan of all countries tapping into the potential of nuclear energy.

[@superchargedpetrolhead]

@@SympatheticArsenal well when they saw two suns on the same day, they probably realised the power of nuclear energy

[@CPATuttle]

I’ve been hearing this for years. Why hasn’t it been done?

[@milorlah]

The efficiency of solar panels is quite low at the moment ranging from 15-20%. It means less energy is generated with a large capacity and this might waste land use. That is why it pays people who can personally use it on roof tops. Most companies would rather invest in wind and other sources. With advancement in technology, solar energy would become more adopted and cheaper. Another issue is the battery, batteries are quite expensive at the moment and have little capacity. It would only get better with technology and adoption.

[@thegrapevine10]

Just because you can power a city with solar panels doesnt mean its going to be cheaper

[@jakewillits4678]

Or the smartest route

[@thehamster2301]

In comparison to running a nuclear power station? Solar panels large enough for domestic buildings cost around £100 each, an inverter around £700. I have 16 panels and a solar boost (£500) which heats the water. My electri bill is around half of my friend's. This is in dull old Britain.

[@ubbisoft]

No it does not mean that its cheaper, but it in fact is about 4 times cheaper per kwh than nuclear so yeah.

[@thekyuwa]

This is total BS. A nuclear power plant could generate up to 8 GW in 4 km² by using 5 or 6 EPR reactors, with a capacity factor of 94%. Solar panels are nowhere near these numbers.

[@sychoboy12345]

Agreed, but I think a culmination of nuclear and solar/geothermal technology will remain the future.

[@kylejohnhaley]

Are nuclear power plants running on a non stop basis? I don’t know fr

[@thekyuwa]

@@kylejohnhaley Yes, nuclear power plants operate non-stop. That's why they're ideal to cover the base load (the energy you constantly need), and hydro and solar/wind are ideal to manage the peaks of energy needs. Hydro especially is great as a natural storage system, cause you can pump the water up when you have energy surplus, and then release it when you need it (whoever tells you you can store energy for an entire country by using batteries is either delusional or malevolent). It gets really problematic when you don't have a reliable source of energy to cover the base load. Renewables are intermittent: if sun is not shining and wind is not blowing, how will you produce energy? I'll tell you how: by burning gas or coal.

[@chrisca]

@@kylejohnhaley Yes,but their energy output can be regulated based on need. Problem is economics, there is literally no way to make a nuclear plant profitable, period. The construction costs nowadays is increasingly high, plus maintenance, checks and inspections, salaries... I was talking with some friends who are more knowledgeable than me and said, for Spain, even if you double our industry and power ALL houses, public lights... with nuclear, it will be more expensive than covering a fifth of the countryside with solar pannels. Therefore, to invest in nuclear is to invest purely on the basis of climate change and sustainability, and just carry the weight of a 30-40 year expectancy nuclear plant

[@some_doofus]

Finally someone else who sees reason. I can’t believe so few people have realised that Elon is flat out lying in this video. 80% of the claims he makes are objectively false. He claims we could power the US with 150-200 square km of solar. Wrong. Current estimates suggest the number is closer to 80,000 square km. And still, these panels will only generate power 24% of the time. They’re highly intermittent, so need a reliable base load backup. This brings me to another of his points: that a solar farm with equal land area of a nuclear plant will produce more power than the nuclear plant. This is just outright delusional. Anyone with any amount of knowledge on nuclear and solar should see through this lie immediately. Nuclear actually requires 75 times less land than an equal output solar farm, and that nuclear plant operates at a capacity factor of 94% as opposed to solars 24%. Its like he got the words solar and nuclear mixed up, because everything he says is basically the opposite of the truth.

[@mortzon5681]

Why when i see subtitles people make, they ALWAYS mess up what is actually said

[@mortzon5681]

@Qiaze 46 you too my man

[@incognito4855]

@@mortzon5681 you 3

[@BarneyGumbl3]

@@incognito4855 you 4

[@_JUNGSEIPEI_]

It’s automatically generated and the people that produce these clips make so many that they can’t be bothered to check.

[@Eamon597]

What?? The subtitles here are perfect ✌

[@Daytonplace7]

People seem to forget that electricity can been transmitted great distances. There are several places in the world where vast arrays of solar panels could be used other than just using our roof-tops.

[@pdtech4524]

Scandinavian countries that spend months in dark polar winters....😲😳🤔

[@jamesbrook16]

An international grid would solve this. We could have a world wide grid sharing electricity so that you could get electricity from say Africa when it’s daylight in Africa and dark in America.

[@pdtech4524]

@@jamesbrook16 A nice theoretical idea but in practise staggeringly difficult to calculate and negotiate who pays who and who owns what! 🤔

[@jamesbrook16]

@@pdtech4524, I’m sure the flows of electricity could be calculated and some would cancel each other out. Scandinavian countries would be paying more. The main issue would be the cost of infrastructure and paying for the use of it. The set up costs would be huge, but once created, the power would be free and pretty well limitless. If all nations diverted 50% of their defence spending to this it would be achieved within a year!!

[@pdtech4524]

@@jamesbrook16 Like I said, great idea but I can see 👀 a huge flaw... You said, 'The setup costs would be huge but the power would be free and limitless...'🤔😲😳 That is your first obstacle, who pays for it? How do we decide how much each country pays? There will be some countries who demand more power, or generate less electricity 🤔 Somebody will want to control the 'power' make money out of it etc If we lived in a world where every country got on with each other and they all worked together for a better future then we would have half a chance of success, unfortunately we don't live in such a world. Many countries simply don't get along with each other, many are at war with each other! Not a great recipe for a joint venture such as a global power grid network!

[@jamesbrook16]

@@pdtech4524, I know. My comment about 50% of defence budgets was a little bit tongue in cheek! The Apollo missions cost the USA 1.75% of the federal budget between 1961 - 1972. So 50% of the defence budget was actually an underestimate! If only we had a world governed by people who put the world and their citizens first!!

[@aureliomorejon6623]

I used to go to KZbin to search for stuff I was interested in. Now, all I watch are shorts. They've got a hold of me. Feels like I'm the one being watched.😟 See you guys on the next one.....

[@dontreadmyusername6787]

Nice observation each medium has its perks and i 'loved' utube because unlike other social media it used to let u watch what u wanna watch

[@falseprofit4u]

mee 2

[@QualicSelf]

It’s called the Tik Tok effecf

[@Bredddi]

They planned it that way to feed you the propaganda like this video. If this were true, power generation companies would have switched a long time ago because the run and maintain cost of solar is much less than a nuclear reactor. Unfortunately it is not at all true. A nuclear reactor can generate multiple megawatts of electricity which would require many many square miles of solar panels to replicate plus you would have to double it because a nuclear reactor runs at night, then double it again because a nuclear reactor runs during cloudy days.

[@Insightful_Inquiries]

Just stop

[@tonyg1489]

It’s a bit scary how KZbin have nailed the algo on these shorts. I’m like a zombie watching

[@altrag3748]

Ik i gotta stop

[@itzajdmting]

Truth. It's pretty tight at this point. I skip like 1 or two for every ten watched

[@sadi5713]

yes, good thing you brought up, will leave now.

[@carrollwessling2767]

Yeah no doubt but answer why if the short sucks we just go to comment section and let video replay 100 times

[@gc077rokeroslash]

@@carrollwessling2767 WHYYYYYYY

[@brandonsheffield9873]

This if from Googles Green energy biased AI Gemini: "Key takeaway: While the solar farm requires more land, it doesn't produce as much power (17,650 MWh/year vs. a constant 2 GW for the nuclear plant). The nuclear plant uses less land but requires a much more concentrated infrastructure due to the nature of nuclear power generation."

[@bengt_axle]

Oil industry: "What about when it is cloudy?"

[@wukwujacic]

Nikola Tesla 120 years ago: “ i can lit every lightbulb in the world , for free, using the force of Niagara Falls”. Nikola Tesla ideas to collect sun’s energy may come to life.

[@-gemberkoekje-5547]

Yeah, no shit, there were like only a million electric light bulbs in 1902

[@vasudev8421]

@@-gemberkoekje-5547 but...... Sigh.

[@Bored__AF]

@@-gemberkoekje-5547Elon : "We can power whole Earth with simply solar panels" *somebody 10000 years in the future* "yeah no shit u don't have 15 planet colonies to power up" U see how moronic u sound ? 🤡

[@DUCK0H]

@@vasudev8421 But?? Don't blue ball me man but what!?

[@shinmentakezo3675]

@@vasudev8421 BUT??!?!

[@NazDaRuler]

Can’t believe she was shocked to find out the sun has enough energy to power the planet, imagine when she finds out we have a moon. Thank you all for 1.6k ❤️❤️❤️💪🏽

[@Lgtg1947]

Ahahahahaha 😆😆😆😆😆

[@rutso175]

Imagine if she reaches down her pants and discover the human making device she got fitted with. She’s bound to faint.

[@steve3592]

Crome off a trailer hitch

[@carlfrye1566]

One solar flare could power the world for years, converting it to electricity is thd hard part....lol.

[@coldsac1987]

🤣🤣🤣

[@saifalikhan3843]

Nuclear power plant take less land to generate most power compared to any other energy plant. Did not expected this from elon

[@newyorker641]

Remember, he is a salesman, never trust a salesman. In the 50s someone was knocking on a farmers door. The door opened and the visitor poured flour on the carpet. "This miraculous machine can clean the carpet in seconds!" The farmer replied: "We still don't have electricity".

[@hzlkelly]

And this is why Africa should just go full SOLAR. We can't work without energy yet we face so many power outages and cuts. We have been blessed with a continent that has the sun beaming right at us for the most part. We need to take advantage of that.

[@ProxCQ]

Reporter: "Can you really say that?" Elon: "A thousand!" Man I've been answering yes and no questions wrong all my life.

[@WilliamAngen]

He said times a thousand

[@PacMan888]

Times a thousand she just interrupted him

[@chelseaultra9348]

So the world's richest and also 1 of the worlds most intelligent people has been wrong his whole life? 🤦‍♂️ are you for real ?

[@adriancliton9706]

Thats “professionalism”

[@keithdechief1]

There are a thousand likes, I'm not adding to it as it seems fitting to leave it there 😁

[@stktenioudakis]

"but in europe? We have a different sun here in europe confirmed

[@NikoMoraKamu]

a metric sun

[@shirleymora3229]

Lol....

[@JhonB77]

On average less sun hours compared to California

[@Souliban]

Europe is the second solar energy producer behind China. Spain, Germany and Italy are the top

[@tipical7349]

Imagine,infrared lights are loading the panels not the fcking sun,and how Europe can have other Sun then the USA :D degen in person

[@badjaeaux]

that woman is shusshed to the delight of the taliban so well, he made this clip into his ring tone

[@John_Lee_]

Now my engineers just have to figure out how to do it

[@HNTR308]

So what do you at Night or in the dark months of the year? 😂 nuklear power works all the Time 🤭

[@levelazn]

@@HNTR308 battery 🪫

[@SuperLifestream]

There is nothing wrong with solar. But the same with his cars. He's not creating a way to recycle them. Recycling solar panels, like his car batteries, is not in the system

[@noahbuckley1460]

@@HNTR308 u don’t have to be completely dependent on solar u can have wind and hydropower

[@HNTR308]

@@noahbuckley1460 For example now, no sun, no wind. And here in Germany we haven't any mountains to build a dam for water power. It's crap.

[@welldiness]

Reporter: what is your evidence of this claim Elon: yes

[@gabrielbrault1999]

I've done the math from Google average any of solar panel needed per household and that would be 144 000 km square. And that's not counting all the industries, the sky scrapers. Street/ traffic lights/ transportation systems ECT

[@welldiness]

@@gabrielbrault1999 wow

[@theexteriorcleaningguy9457]

@@gabrielbrault1999 so is he wrong or right?

[@thomasshepard6030]

​@@theexteriorcleaningguy9457 look up the biggest solar panel system in America and why its not being used today it was a complete failure

[@gabrielbrault1999]

@@theexteriorcleaningguy9457 no way he's need 100x time more than what he speculated, just for household use. Unless his got better solar panel that requires less space

[@magnificioso15]

She was just about to say: "in europe?... Where is nightime rightnow?"

[@thisisnumber0]

Elon doesn't know it goes dark at night.

[@tomascenteno]

I would expect someone like Elon Musk to check his numbers before he talks: 1GW nuclear power plant occupies 1.3 square miles. 1GW of solar occupies nearly 8 square miles. Plus, this is installed capacity of solar, which is not the same as real output since productivity isn’t 100%. What he said is total nonsense. As he said, the calculations are easy to do, he should do them.

[@paulclaahsen3497]

Thank you....we have both Nuclear and Solar and we have enough Nuclear that we can sell 43% of it to California and their punie solar around their state produces like 11% on a good sunny day and they goes away at night

[@jono493]

Your missing something obvious though. A 1GW Nucleur power plant may occupy 1.3 sq miles, but what about all the exclusion areas, support building etc etc. don't think its an unreasonable estimate.

[@paulclaahsen3497]

@@jono493 Have you ever been to palaverde nuclear power plant outside Phoenix outside Phoenix it may be let's say 2 mile² with everything but that's with everything it's with everything that powers more than half of Arizona and 43% of all of the electricity generated goes to California

[@GiozRockin]

At the end of the day you’re fighting a lose cause. Yes Nuclear May be more powerful but in reality solar is more efficient. And we could use solar panels just about everywhere that would be bring u matched energy. Only reason we don’t do it is because oil companies make billions. Same reason why we are able to create nano computers yet we still have gas cars 💀

[@paulclaahsen3497]

@@GiozRockin You are so foolish 1st of all nuclear plants can go for a 100 years most solar panels have a maximum a 10 year shelf life and then they become toxic waste the amount of toxic waste from A 100 years can fit in one semi trailer. the toxic waste from a field of solar panels would take up thousands and thousands and thousands Miles of underground storage

[@jeremysanders8138]

That's if each and every panel were at constant optimal use. Good luck with that. Constant management, constant panel replacement even in the best locations.

[@kicker1323]

first dude I seen in these comments using relevant knowledge, 3rd problems the materials to make that many high quality panels. The best use for large scale solar generation is waiting till there is a big breakthrough in efficacy. That would solve most of the problems its currently facing imo.

[@jaradshaw4723]

not enough batteries to even power 2% of the USA exist in the world

[@kicker1323]

@@jaradshaw4723 batteries are not the only solution to the storage of energy, but yes that is a problem as well but again its just to soon for it to be viable large scale. Its still in its infancy, it took 200yrs for the oil/natural gas/coal industry to become as efficient as it is.

[@ShenandoahTim]

I agree. Wind and Solar are great, but their proponents always overlook their flaws and costs.

[@tyrzxv]

​​@@jaradshaw4723 what kind of batteries are you talking about? I'm assuming you mean lithium. But the largest, oldest, easiest, and most reliable battery mankind has is the Water Battery, where you Pump water uphill into a pond/lake/reservoir and then when you need power (like at night) you let gravity pull it back down through a hydrogenerator into a lower reservoir. And although there are water shortages going on, that's generally because of the mismanagement of those water systems. The earth is 2/3 water on the surface. edit: and yes, these water batteries already exist and have been in use for a very long time. People seem to think Lithium Batteries are the only kind of way to store energy, but human kind didn't start with lithium.

[@Max_Janszen]

The problem is transmission/interconnecting grids, grid storage and of course how could we forget POLITICS 😅 We are close, keep lobbying for better tech/better systems

[@LanaDelReysBabe]

exactly! Nuclear is liked by most politicians though and that is the future. We are doing good we just need to show people that nuclear is better than fossil fuels

[@hellrazor117]

Gotta earn those subsidies with that golden tongue.

[@austinnordquist5516]

That’s assuming that solar panels were operating at 100% efficiency

[@erikwincentson5865]

No

[@thecanmanification]

You just build more solar panels lol. The issue with solar is it’s not really profitable in a sustained way like fossil fuels are

[@jackunknown1692]

That was my guess

[@jaybali1742]

@@thecanmanification fossil fuels are non-renewable 100% not sustainable (plus the carbon emissions, is it really worth it)

[@atrxmx2542]

@@jaybali1742 he’s saying profit sustainability. it’s a lot easier to price oil than electricity and you’d only have to buy em once and replace em every 10-20 years and they’d use the same/less maintenance

[@Tall-Cool-Drink]

What we lack is the technology to efficiently capture that energy.

[@richardgrier8968]

More importantly, we need technology to *store* the energy.

[@xanhfei]

Yeah, the current commercial solar panel are around 20% efficient.

[@nurzhanualiev2841]

@@richardgrier8968 more importantly, we need people to do that. And that also means having a night with a woman to create a human being

[@richardgrier8968]

@@nurzhanualiev2841 ????

[@repunklican1181]

Binnggggooooo. I think I read solar panels absorb like 15% of the sun's energy or some crap. Definitely not the best

[@Igra180]

I call BS on the 200 sq km claim.

[@digger105337]

But not enough for 2/3rds of the day. Only about 10am- 3pm ( peak sun) and certainly not at night. If you use all the power during the day, there's NO power left to charge a ( dangerous) battery bank for night time. The battery banks tend to catch fire and pollute the area almost as bad as a nuclear meltdown.

[@CensoredbyYTforhavinganopinion]

I live in Scotland the street light's are brighter than the sun 🤣

[@beetlejuice8378]

🤣

[@jacobpipers]

and like the reporter has no idea how solar works...

[@alexgeld7173]

But it's the same in London during winter, and don't make me start on Scandinavia.

[@abinodattil6422]

Doesn’t Europe have a super grid, literally energy from other side

[@ABRAHAM4EVER]

Rely on Africa bro, the whole world is for you

[@ignaciogarciadecarellan4225]

Benban solar park: 1,6GW in 37.2 km^2 Hanul nuclear plant: 6,16GW in less than 1km^2

[@acktopaf4606]

Ikr

[@frankmontez6853]

We can’t store the energy. We’ll need massive numbers of batteries. Only in science fiction could we pull this off

[@user-dn3id1cl9b]

Isn't everything we are seeing everyday science fiction.

[@monetroshi]

Elon sounds like he wants to own the Sun next and charge us for energy

[@oscargr_]

I would like to see your calculations on that Mr Musk. An average nuclear plant is about 1 GW. And it runs 24/7.

[@stevezeller7040]

Bravo,

[@athgt6630]

Actually a modern NPP will produce 1.6-1.8 GW. Flat line 24x7. If you cover a square km you'll get 150MW for 6-8 hrs per day. LMAO

[@neilbohrs5990]

A typical GW NPP in the United States needs a little more than 1 square mile to operate. Today's most efficient solar panels have about 42% efficiency which can produce about 420 watt per square meter. This is 420 MW per square kilometer. Multiply by 5 hours, that's 2.1 GW per square kilometers per day. There are 2.59 square km per square mile, so that's 5.44 GW per square mile per day. That is much less than 24 GW for a NPP per day but I'd much rather live close to a solar facility than a NPP. Edit: There are apparently solar cells that exceed 130% efficiency. He is right. I'm not surprised.

[@fantasticalthoughts]

​@@neilbohrs5990 yes and solar panels are self sufficient, they don't need any ressources other than for repairing unlike nuclear

[@bcoldwell1]

Agree, sounds questionable, but perhaps the surrounding zone where no one wants to live was included in his land area figure. That would be....large

[@Volticymo]

*Elon Musk:* “solar panels generate more power than nuclear power plant in the same area” *Science:* “am I a joke to you?”

[@raulsantandertirado4400]

IKR?!

[@andylugo7060]

Sources please.

[@techpro_videos1431]

What to do at night?

[@eclipsethesun251]

@@dorian1915 while this is true, nuclear fission is so much more power. Coal, oil, and natural gas are the most efficient source we have so far. You could fill my high school/middle school complex (that have 600 enrolled each) with coal and it would power the same amount as a cup of water filled with uranium

[@laurencezemlick1979]

@@dorian1915 the energy it creates IS heat. The heat isn’t wasted energy, it IS the energy

[@RoyalDasen227]

Elon: The World 🌎🌍 Reporter: California Elon: USA Reporter: Europe What's thinking about, she doesn't even give the tech genius chance to amaze the audience 😊😊😊

[@fatboywonder355]

Clouds: "I'm about to ruin this man's whole career"

[@AgentChavo]

Batteries to the clouds: “no you won’t”

[@TM-MDX]

You don’t necessarily need sunlight streaming on the solar panels, a daylight is more than enough, do some research my guy

[@michaelbanda9993]

Clouds don’t make a difference.

[@VinEllis]

I hope you’re not serious. The actual light has nothing to do with energy.

[@mufarisfa3939]

What if it's raining? tbh I never really knew how solar panel works.

[@1337rage]

You can tell he's a man of culture, when he used square kilometers 💪

[@dallasb1224]

I mean he's from south Africa so it makes sense, because if he was born and raised in the US he woulda have used literally anything else as a measurement. 🤠

[@S1893-0]

To be honest I don’t notice if he uses km. It rather shows you’re American when you actually make a deal of it. That discussion is long finished. Just the US is to stubborn …

[@SienaaBee]

He's not from this country genius

[@jan-willembavinck3650]

That's the most common system

[@joadwr]

@@S1893-0 not just USA

[@lucas60336]

Theoretically it could, but practically the resources required to build the solar panels would greatly exceed our capability to produce them.

[@sarkismehrabian2046]

This is Elon Musk with a few hours of sleep a night.

[@bennypit4411]

But it's not true. Not even close, the nuclear comparison is kinda funny actually. The R.E. Ginna reactor operates at 582 MW capacity for 24 hours, it would take 200K 250 watt panels operating at full sunlight 8 hours a day to do that. If the plant has 2 reactors that's 400K panels. that would take over 200 acres just for panels alone, then take warehouses the size of walmart to house that power and take 4800 metric tonnes of copper to build those panels and storage structure

[@ibewcountry]

@@bennypit4411 Amen ! E-Lawn's lack of sleep is showing....badly.

[@reryro1266]

Yeah...he can read and regurgitate. Not accurately, but he does it so assuredly that people mistake his confidence for actual expertise.

[@lol941]

​@@bennypit4411wow, good work

[@imToniQX]

​@@bennypit4411your giving a basis off of consumer available solar panels, as far as im aware there are already 500 - 1000 watt solar panels that are faster and more efficient and they arent any bigger

[@garp9433]

He is wrong. I did my masters thesis on this topic and answered a similar question. Not accurate at allllll

[@HolyEyeWasHere]

Thank you!

[@mariusseidel9654]

Tell us the truth

[@HolyEyeWasHere]

@@mariusseidel9654I looked it up: How much land of solar panels would it take to power the US? 22,000 square miles With the conservative numbers from NREL's land use report, we can estimate that roughly 14,000,000 acres or 22,000 square miles of solar panel-filled land would be required to generate enough electricity to solar-power the U.S. This is about the size of the Mojave desert.

[@Thatguy-mo8jd]

If nuclear plants produced less energy per unit area than solar we would have switched to solar about 50 years ago…

[@TequilaSnakke]

yup solar panels tend to get incredibly hot, it badly messes up the local ecosystem and they need constant maintenance

[@mikemeloan6613]

Problem is the goes down everyday and the storage needed is extremely expensive. We can power the world many times over with nuclear regardless of the weather and it’s 100% clean.

[@stephencuskley5251]

As DOOMBERG says, deploying enough batteries to run the grid when the sun doesn't shine is NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE and CERTAINLY UNAFFORDABLE!!!

[@ACantu-de8pg]

"But in Europe " no lady the sun only has enough power to recharge a battery operated lawnmower

[@Jcarlwill]

It's very rainy in Europe... Well London for sure... Lol

[@AimbotAU]

Cool. That's almost enough to power my 4090

[@jenniferwilkins9880]

Lucky you got a 4090 :)

[@AimbotAU]

@@jenniferwilkins9880 not luck. Money.

[@razee7869]

@@AimbotAU 😂

[@__Ryan_]

😂

[@JohnCrebo]

Elon? You’d have to be him to afford one

[@mandyshines4940]

Not me waiting for a Mamamoo meme 😅

[@flitsies]

He is bang on correct, if every roof was covered with solar panels that would produce so much electricity it would kill off power plants and that is probably why it is not done.

[@HazyJ28]

Wow! Such a convincing argument from a man who owns a solar company. I'm sure this is very genuine

[@SoL600rr]

I don’t own a solar company but I’m pretty sure the gas and coal and nuclear power company’s are worse💀

[@RYU47376]

@@SoL600rr maybe that's debatable, but the amount of bs and lies elon tells here are not debatable. Solar generate more power than nuclear at the same area? That's bullshit. And one of the biggest hurdles in solar is where you're going to store the energy.

[@lc9991x]

@@SoL600rr what’s wrong with the nuclear companies? Also, the media and governments hate nuclear, they don’t have much political/economic power

[@xYzBuLlet]

Name one company that doesn't promote what they sell. If you're impartial, go after everyone who does this to make yourself feel even more useful to societal issues.

[@MajinRixch]

@@xYzBuLlet promoting a product and just straight up making shit up and passing it as science and facts because it benefits your company is nowhere near the same.

[@floatingshoppinglist5193]

I'm blown away how captions are never right

[@xfxgaming1627]

Fast amount of energy ❎ Vast amount of energy ✅

[@ronnonyabizness5240]

Solar panels suck when it's cloudy or nighttime. Without energy storage, collecting it during the day is pointless. Fortunately Elon 8s building the Gigaplant.

[@Themata]

Haha. Solar's great, but he's talking smack here

[@mastroitek]

Yeah. I generally like his ideas, but when he speaks about those things almost seems like he can't see the full picture. Also I did not check the math but it seems....inaccurate

[@CoffeeCartel666]

Yea I don’t check the maths tho seems real 🤦🏼‍♂️

[@rorschacht8478]

@@CoffeeCartel666 All you need to do is imagine a shady winter month. How are you going to generate electricity when there's no sun? Sure, you could store electricity from the summer and ration it out during winter, but the amount of batteries it would take is literal insanity. Now we're not even considering maintenance and environmental impact of producing all the panels and batteries about every 7-12 years. With current technology, his idea is garbage. Maybe in the not too far future when we have better batteries, but solar panels are still not ever going to be adequate as a single power source. Nuclear is literally and indisputably the best option. Edited (at 78 likes): I take back "solar panels aren't ever going to be adequate as a single power source" because I don't know what the future holds. If we could somehow get the panels themselves closer to the sun (not using land area on earth) and magically transfer the energy to earth (I guess wirelessly?!), then yes we could use only solar, but that's science fiction as of 2022 and I highly doubt it would ever become possible. The energy transferred from the sun to the earth's surface is only so much and varies greatly. As for nuclear, it's our best option TODAY. I have no idea about future technology.

[@mastroitek]

@@rorschacht8478 Well we would need to store energy also for the evening and night, so even in summer this would not work that well. With that said, I believe there could be a method to store huge amounts of energy without using batteries. Since space isn't really a problem here, we could use massive rocks as batteries, this can be done by using the excess energy produced during the day to lift those rocks, so energy would be stored in the form of "potential gravitational energy". There are already companies doing this and to me it makes a lot of sense when trying to store such huge amounts of energy. Anyway there are other problems, like the effect that solar panels would have on the climate of the region (since we need >200km^2), not sure how much it would effect it but I know it is a thing.

[@mastroitek]

@@CoffeeCartel666 I have 100m^2 of solar panels (installed 2y ago) on my roof and living just over Italy I have good sun exposure. In the last 12m they produced 49MWh so if we do the math we get that 1m^2 produces about 0.5MWh per year. 200km^2 is equal to 200'000'000m^2, multiplied by 0.5 it gives us 100'000'000MWh = 100TWh. Google says that the US energy consumption is about 3'930 TWh per year, soooo...

[@pthompson2113]

That's absolutely ludicrous! 🤣🤣🤣 A nuclear power plant produces so much much much more than the solar panels that would cover the area of the plant! Obe of the most insane things I've ever heard!

[@JamesCh.]

Nope, you are not right.

[@HWM636]

Prove it

[@oldfashnd7237]

@@JamesCh. he is right though. See my other reply.

[@wendellhullett7711]

Then why is it not being done? If power companies could get "free" energy..unmanned ...way more cost effective....why wouldn't it be done more?

[@robertc567able]

@@wendellhullett7711 because of the greedy fossil fuel industry barons!

[@ianbirkinhead4103]

China isn’t just talking about it, they are converting desert land in China to have enough solar and wind energy to run whole countries.

[@bbtjosh]

I love this man, he's extremely intelligent.

[@phetsavangvethsouvanh5642]

Lady you are interviewing a 'Rocket science test "!!!! 😂😂😂

[@veterangamer1979]

Reminds me of the movie "Cat in the Hat." The advertising scene. "Really?" "Really." "All done by the sun?" "Really."

[@jeffreydoerflein3025]

Ill get you, and it'll look like a bloody accident

[@rolysosa7777]

I am powering my house with a panel I got from an old calculator. Not made up by me

[@fredthechihuahua]

😂😂😂

[@BakaSleeper]

🤣🤣🤣

[@chiefsdad]

You're eating cold beans if I come round and put my thumb over it.

[@brolysmash9333]

Is that a Casio panel calculator lol

[@theredeyedjedi701]

Nah gotta be the blue texas instrument

[@theanhoe72]

You need to convert that area to the number of football fields for it to make sense.

[@Cosmic-Wanderer]

Surprised they havent silenced him for saying stuff like this

[@jacksonvaldez5911]

Let's just make a dyson sphere

[@MuscleManSupreme]

It would take hundreds of years unless everyone did their part

[@Assassinsam353]

@@MuscleManSupreme thousands

[@nightmeds3339]

@@MuscleManSupreme I think that’s the joke

[@amacca2085]

Just get a dyson hoover

[@Leon.Stanic]

Should be easy

[@ronbo30]

The sun burns more energy in one second then the history of mankind burning energy.

[@gedgjoumk5449]

Wtf

[@kennethbenjamin1304]

True, but less than a fraction of a percent of that reaches us, and very little of that gets through the atmosphere for us to use.

[@jakubknopik4412]

dyson sphere

[@Why_U_Geh]

@@emadalemady7910 yes

[@streameant]

Of course, the sun is millions of times larger than eart

[@OKOKOKOKOKOKOK-zn2fy]

Replacing the old home and office computers with more efficient micro computers and modern monitors would save a staggering amount of power. The next generation of computers, printers, and routers could allow us to idle 1/4 of our coal fired power plants.

[@ochardkeo9458]

It's funny how sunscreen is a billion-dollar business protecting skin from the sun's rays, but no one ever had solar as their first thought. I've been amazed by solar since I was 12 years old and turbine generators in miniature form on bikes to power night lights as the wheel spun when I was 10 years old. The amazing tech that God has given mankind.

[@DeepakChoudhary-vg2sz]

He's talking about Solar energy here but I'm pretty sure it's the Weed energy spittin out those numbers.

[@donnydenzel2288]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@noland5345]

I like how the weed is the issue not the fucking gallon of whiskey he drank😂

[@CM-rg9zg]

Oh yeah. Who is Elon Musk. Nobody compared to Deepak.

[@DeepakChoudhary-vg2sz]

@@CM-rg9zg whooosh

[@donnydenzel2288]

@@CM-rg9zg i mean him being Elon Musk doesn't mean he's always right. Don't follow anyone blindly.

[@saikiranmanjunath1612]

Elon : you power the whole world with solar energy Interviewer : what about europe? Elon : ah, there's no sun in Europe yet, but we can hope so in the future.

[@atrumluminarium]

Yeah but by that logic, keep the nuclear plant and just add panels on top of it no need to replace it and waste land on just solar panels

[@AyushSharma80001]

It's so great to see how Elon Musk explains from 0

[@chrisL50764]

The problem is you need to generate and then store a huge amount of extra energy for night time and low solar output. The amount of batteries needed would be staggering.

[@jackiejackyjaqy...7219]

I mean they can make an energy storage device to install in each home or structure that requires electricity and in the day time those personal energy circuits will charge up while the rest of it is being used and we can use it at night too... We don't really gotta supply both day's and nights supply directly from the source now do we...

[@vassabatielos4740]

I know a man that makes batteries

[@reiser8258]

@@vassabatielos4740 walter white

[@repunklican1181]

Batteries? There would need to be literal stations that store the energy

[@stevea5945]

@@repunklican1181 then imagine every home has battery storage+ battery storage station+ nuclear energy plants it will sustain for many years maybe you will be dead until then 😅

[@pdxyyz4327]

It's about storage. You can collect the energy but it is useless if you can't use it immediately. You have to have the storage capacity. Not to mention the further you have to move the power the more you lose.

[@banemiladinov8202]

Duracell?

[@javierconde6295]

sodium batteries, iron batteries, pumped hydro, air compressed batteries, redox batteries, gravitational batteries, etc... much tech the problem are the lobbies

[@muhammadnazerinsaripin1925]

That why he focus on battery, the moment they have breakthrough oil would be useless as energy.

[@Gandi2000]

Battery and grid connection

[@orlandoholwerda2373]

The grid already exists on a fragmented mass scale.

[@jimhealy4890]

California: welcome to my world. (Elon Musk)

[@Marcus-xl9kr]

I forget where its at but its a solar tower that uses a pretty small area and uses mirrors to reflect the suns heat energy to the top of this tower that generates enormous amounts of heat that evaporates water to turn turbines. Basically same thing that nuclear does only without the radioactive materials. Also the heat generated with this reflected light allows this evaporation process to continue even at night.

[@AngolanoNventaOficial]

Nikola Tesla watching this in heaven : 🤡

[@tovrbtw1219]

You thinking heaven exists: 🤡

[@AngolanoNventaOficial]

@@tovrbtw1219 i prefer think that it does exist just in case that really exists 🤣🤣

[@ok_jaja]

@@tovrbtw1219 you judging people : 🤡

[@caasieu]

@@AngolanoNventaOficial um irmão angolano, Nice! 😂🔥

[@czattila0142]

Damn he got ratiod 💀💀💀

[@Fl0yd-]

You cut out the best part, “basically the state of idaho”

[@brandonhuffman5733]

He says Utah

[@mattgolka6266]

Hes says 200 sq kilometers of the US to power the US, the us is 8,000,000 sq kilometers. We would need 00.0025% of the US covered. Idaho is 200,000 kilometers or 2.5%.

[@Spidr-Man]

Even better... Fuck Idaho

[@jabbathehut1871]

"A corner of utah," or 1‰ of it.

[@some_doofus]

@@mattgolka6266 good to see someone here using numbers, but unfortunately nobody thought to fact check Elons numbers. He claims you’d only need an area of 200 square km to power the US? Straight out of the gate this is just blatantly false. Current estimates suggest you’d need between 35,000 and 57,000 square km of solar to supposedly meet 100% of US energy needs. However this says nothing for grid stability and off peak power supply which make this prospect basically impossible. Solar has a maximum capacity factor of only 24% (and with many arrays that number is only 10-15%), meaning on average it generates power only 24% of the time, and last I checked we need power 100% of the time, with a large amount of that at night when the sun never shines. Nuclear, on the other hand has the highest capacity factor of all methods at 93.5% making it the most reliable method of energy production by a large margin. Nuclear, despite what Elon inanely claims in this video, requires at least 75 times *less* land than solar to produce the same amount of power (and that power is much more reliable and efficient). The “tidbit” he gives claiming solar panels covering an equal area of a nuclear plant would produce more than the nuclear plant is just a flat out lie and honestly I’ve never seen a claim so ridiculous in all my time researching this matter. 80% of his claims in this video are objectively false and I hate that this misinformation is being shared around by “tech” KZbin pages as if Elon is going to save the world with 100% solar. It’s just blatant and dangerous misinformation.

[@willeisinga2089]

Everywhere. I have Rooftop Solar for 12 Years Now in Groningen Nederland. Solar and Heatpump. EV car on Rooftop Solar. 12 years no energybill. The Sun shines also in Europa. Where does the Lady come from? Agree Elon👍

[@johnj4860]

that interviewer wasn't chosen for her ability to ask intelligent questions.

[@kasroa]

If we could only harness his ability to grift, we could power the world 10 times over.

[@burningbarnavit]

Comment of the year!

[@ssquarepants04]

sadly a lot of people only want 1 kind of power. MONEY

[@angrybrit7331]

Exactly

[@rick7122]

Elon:You can run a mile if you have the stamina to do it Reporter: Ah around the block?

[@wolverineiscool7161]

lol