Elon Musk Reveals Starship V3 is Coming!

Elon Musk Reveals Starship V3 is Coming!
Last Video: How SpaceX and NASA Will Land On The Moon
• How SpaceX and NASA Wi...
►Become a member today: / @thespaceraceyt
►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslaspace.com/
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Tesla Space: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: [e-mail]
#Spacex #Space #Mars

[@CreepToeJoe]

"It's too round on the top. It needs to be pointy!" he said. 😅😅

[@Eric_Tennant]

lmao

[@Forevertrue]

Take a look at Flash Gordon's rocket of 90 years ago. It looks just like this one.

[@jeanjohnson2743]

😂U Dic-tator

[@user-kv5fw7xz9c]

But how do they plan to cover it with heat shield?

[@peterclarke3020]

@@user-kv5fw7xz9cSame as they do right now - they glue the heat shield tiles to the nose cone.

[@vitorneves3054]

"I don't like regolith, it is Eletrostatyc, and it is everywere" Says Anakin Moonwalker

[@Vintageandretrostudios]

Lol

[@MoempfLP]

It is "omnipresent"

[@rock-bottom2023]

Starship Version 3 will be like NASA's Artemis SLS being used as a booster to launch NASA's Saturn 5 as a second stage.

[@barneymiller4088]

After watching SpaceX, it is even more remarkable that we landed people on The Moon in the 1960s (60 years ago). SpaceX tested dozens of rockets to get to the Raptor engine and Falcon rockets. Not even to mention the advantages in computers, production sciences and materials. Even given all that they are just now ready for a Moon mission.

[@oscaar_3985]

I mean to be fair NASA had something like over 10 times its current annual budget, adjusted for inflation, during the Apollo era, so that was a pretty big advantage

[@rock-bottom2023]

Pointier is scarier.

[@raedwulf61]

Sierra never ceases to impress.

[@robertheinrich2994]

at 1:35 always consider pointy end up, flamy end down ;-) quite ancient rocket wisdom

[@CamelxRavenNova2]

“I don’t like sand, it’s course and rough and it gets everywhere” ~ Anakin Skywalker. Hats Off

[@danielding4986]

damn that thumbnail looks cool

[@undertow2142]

It’s hard to see how any lunar habitat can function long term without keeping the dust completely sealed outside. Space suit condoms and a mud room? Like a thin plastic film applied in the outside of the suit upon egress that is easily removed when returning to the habitat. Alternatively the idea of keeping the suits “docked” on the outside which astronauts can climb into may be the way to go. It would be awesome if electrostatics is enough to keep the suit clear.

[@zachb1706]

The solution is to electrically charge the outside of the suit. Moon dust is charged, such g is why it sticks to everything. That also means it can be easily repelled.

[@TheEvilmooseofdoom]

If their hopes for water on the moon are anything like they hope that opens another door for cleaning things.

[@mbsfilms7749]

the v3 had me laughing so hard, looks like someone just resize the image XD but its pretty cool

[@SebastianWellsTL]

I mean you're not wrong it looks kinda odd. But this is the first rendering of this new concept design. It could change a lot in the coming years and perhaps look less, for lack of a better word, weird.

[@just_archan]

​@@SebastianWellsTLI would point that same reaction we had on first renders of Starship itself. It was something wrong with aerodynamic surfaces so far in front. We just get used to current proportions.

[@pauljcampbell2997]

Great video as always. Thank you!

[@isaganipalanca8803]

Will the rockets now emit colored fireworks when they explode as an upgrade?

[@TheEvilmooseofdoom]

Will you make sense?

[@isaganipalanca8803]

@@TheEvilmooseofdoom As soon as the Grand Muskrat does, I also will.

[@MzGetsBaked]

@@TheEvilmooseofdoom will you ever understand sarcasm/jokes

[@nickl5658]

It already burns green upon reentry... from the engines burning up in plasma.

[@isaganipalanca8803]

@@nickl5658 LOL maybe the next step would be burning blue as well!

[@leriku2270]

The higher thrust on the V2 is because it will use Raptor 3s (maybe even 4?) not because of the tank stretch

[@just_archan]

Yup, tank is stretched because higher thrust allows that and is needed to feed more powerful raptors

[@ruud9767]

Promises of success in the future, but will Starship ever be as outstanding as the Hyperloop?

[@thotmorgana]

Lol, I can appreciate the dig, but starship is already the most powerful rocket ever made. It is already succesful in bringing more mass to space than any other rocket before. Only the reuse part still needs to develop further but that is a completely new thing that only falcon 9 rockets can do. So yeahh starship is already the most succesful rocket except for their own falcon 9 rocket.

[@filonin2]

From the most successful rocket company ever? Not making sense.

[@triage2962]

@@thotmorgana No it is not because flight 3 has a payload of 40-50t as Elmo said himself.

[@kevinkey5270]

​@@thotmorganaYou are funny saying that a rocket that is never made It to orbit or recovered a single bit of itself is the most successful rocket ever. I will refer you to the Saturn V which is the actual most successful rocket ever. You should read more history before you spew your muskness.

[@TheEvilmooseofdoom]

It's a system still in development. It's premature to judge it at this point. Hyperloop? That's still an ongoing R&D thing, it's likely a pipe dream but it keep engineering students thinking.

[@tom_skip3523]

The future is going to be amazing

[@SebastianWellsTL]

I wouldn't be surprised if the wing design changes considerably for V3 Starships.

[@pauljcampbell2997]

Larger?

[@Dev05-fr5np]

BIGGER BETTER STRONGER

[@Magmanic]

Starship 3 stage two will have more than 2/3 the thrust of Saturn 5's stage one. Insane.

[@The1QwertySky]

its almost like launching a saturn 5 as a 2nd stage

[@uuzd4s]

Thank You and a Job Well Done on being one of the Very Few Space channel's willing to discuss the Moon Dust issue. NASA doesn't talk about it but their last Apollo Missions w/ extended Moon excursions told the rather scary tale of what Moon Dust does to equipment & people. That stuff ruined and nearly disabled a LOT of equipment that was exposed and being statically charged make it a problem that can't be ignored. Without Weather to wear the stuff down, every particle is Razor Sharp and looking for a new home.

[@projectarduino2295]

“Calling in strategem!” -Siera Space, probably.

[@ronjon7942]

Always wondered why the N1 interstages were like that.

[@olololoolol8526]

Perfect video 👍

[@quinto190]

really good video!

[@hallahgray3190]

Is this the beginning? Of space drop pods for soldiers. It looks very similar to a sci-fi soldier delivery system.

[@andrewsawyers9312]

I think with the capability and the added load capacity V3 could have landing legs for the booster like the falcon rockets which I think would be safer and more flexibility when it comes to landing

[@deanspanos8210]

Sierra Space, it's all well and good for supplies, but what about reinforcements?

[@rudypieplenbosch6752]

Interesting topic about the moon dust

[@opcn18]

Lots of people in the comments boasting about how powerful v3 is supposed to be, but v1 was supposed to be powerful too. There is more distance between what v1 delivers and what it was supposed to than there is between what v3 is supposed to deliver and what v1 was supposed to deliver.

[@allgood6760]

Interesting times 👍🚀

[@marinoceccotti9155]

Yea yeah yeah. I'd have expected he said it would eventually work fine.

[@eugenecbell]

150 meters tall that is like a 50 story building. That is so huge!!!

[@GarySarah-sp5bo]

Can the space ship hold two of the bottom tanks in the spaceship. With out making it bigger too carry them.

[@PenguinBrix]

I love this channel

[@peterclarke3020]

They will need to increase the water pressure for the OLT with Raptor-3.

[@addeyyry]

I don’t quite get what you could drop at a lower cost than getting the stuff there traditionally would be? Or conversely, what interesting opportunities this opens up for that is worth the price? Military / secret service agencies most likely

[@starwest8851]

seems so fun and adventure

[@HEHEHHEHEHEHEHEHEHUH]

5:05 has footprints

[@tripleb94]

Are we launching v2 for the next flight, or we still doing v1 for a bit? I don't remember.

[@gabrielgolding5380]

They have four more v1’s to fly first. I won’t be surprised if one or more of those get skipped though.

[@TheEvilmooseofdoom]

They still have some V1 test articles.

[@Petequinn741]

Be great when the first version is actually cruising space first

[@natayachantakasamkun1004]

ทุกท่านสุดยอดมากค่ะ

[@surendrakc4526]

I think it would be better if SpaceX get a contract of GigaSpaceStation, oribiting Earth and and smaller Space Station orbiting Mars

[@just_archan]

I would point that 2mln for Starship is related to internal cost of launch. Internal cost of launching reused Falcon 9 is ca 20 mln. Variable price is dependant on configuration of second stage, place where it desired landing, or fairing price. 67 mln is what SpaceX charging customers.

[@keithsextonakathebluerose]

How far could Starship 3 take a 100 ton load. Not every flight needs to be "as much as it will carry" How fast could it go without any payload, just a speed run?

[@kolbyking2315]

If it can take 200 tons into LEO, and it's dry mass proportion is the same as current starship (7.7%), then starship 3 can give a 100 ton payload 800 m/s of extra delta-v. Lunar transfer is ~3150 m/s. With no payload, starship 3 has ~2000 m/s of delta-v to play with.

[@keithsextonakathebluerose]

@kolbyking2315 Thank you greatly! This is why I ask. I don't learning new things.

[@rickb.4168]

The real question is. "How far can Starblip 3 scatter 100 tons of debris over the planet?"

[@douglachman7330]

How about a version 3B upgrade to empower post orbital space travel? Remount the combined power unit and fuel tanks from the common dome through to the rocket nozzles. Then the entire power unit is mounted so that it can be extended until the existing common dome is locked in to its new position 10 metres from the base of the external body skin.This would only be completed after the achievement of orbit. This would create a sizable area for long trip duration use. By incorporating 2 Sierra space 12 metre inflatable habitats inside the newly created area (after extension) each with access airlocks there would be considerable new space for storage, recreation, work areas or even a greenhouse to grow food and thus increase oxygen. The trip to the moon or mars would become much more comfortable and actually productive. As in space there is no resistance there would be no requirements for retracting the power unit until entering orbit at the destination. Thus the inflatable areas would probably have a 3 longitudinally spaced floor levels of 1 x 3m plus 2 x 2.6m. The 3 m floor area would be an added safe zone for radiation or space debris impact. This structure would be the cheapest orbiting hotel or other use for mars. Obviously it could carry enough supplies to cover extended trip consumables including the air used to inflate the habitat units.. i am sure Sierra Space could sort the mostly existing habitat units if Space X could re engineer the power unit requirements. This would coincide with the already proposed in orbit refuelling methods. Just a thought from downunder in Sydney. A Space X admirer from the beginning but no engineering degree. I hope the idea supports some innovations.

[@Doidera-rl9kd]

star ship is getting more and more amazing, lets say, more tech,, bigger rockets.. soon new destinations, =) and further modern rockets..

[@iamsoalive1974]

starship is a spaceship that would take you star to star, good video tho

[@madelineremy5128]

❤😂🎉 wish SpaceX CEO and SpaceX Team great work and success. AMEN 😢

[@giovannip.1433]

Isn't more effective to launch a rocket off a very large aircraft? No damage to launch facilities from hot rocket exhaust.

[@user-lc9wx9pe1c]

A while ago I suggested an inner and outer shell . for a maned flightship. An inner shell for the human part of the ship to consist of carbon fiber and the outer shell having a hollow shell , filled with an i nert gas ie argon to protect the humans from radiation ! Of course this ship needs to be built in low obit, wirth 5 nulcear engines . 4 for thrust. 2 for internal power and for a debris shield ! A shuttle needs to be brought along for a return voyage and entry module . Habitats need to bulit and sent to Mars before launch of the human depature. I suggest somewhere in Vallis Mariara as it has a higher pressue in the lower basin of the Vally and oxygen may be in greater abundance as well as caves suitable for human protection . A door could be built to trap the oxygen and radiation. Water may be more accsessable in this region also. Mike.

[@WolfeSaber9933]

Didn't Musk say the version two for Starship was going to be twice the diameter?

[@darthpotato1799]

V2 is taller but looks thinner.

[@SebastianWellsTL]

The fact that it is taller and the wings are somewhat wider creates that illusion. They are actually exactly the same width even as represented in this render.

[@darthpotato1799]

@@SebastianWellsTL ok

[@joncleek5406]

Any taller and Starship can simply start in space!

[@texan-american200]

"POINTIER..." 🤔🧐 Yep sounds like a legitimate engineering term. 😬

[@noelle3551]

When you talk about sand, moon dust is not akin to the beach or builders' sand which is thick and course. It is more like desert sand, very fine particles, i.e.. the Sahara as it gets in everywhere, including my camera when I visited the region, and it cost a lot to get it removed

[@CosmicVoyage5]

great

[@jackcat3745]

He is a smart person.

[@Sigma_the_Enigma9]

Cigar shaped mother ship actually ❤❤

[@JULIANAHASSANI]

🚀🚀🚀🚀

[@JosephDeLuna-yj8vg]

Space X Is Outstanding!!!

[@rickb.4168]

As in Rubbish?

[@foxguysumthing]

No, there rocket is *_really_* big

[@Ayo22210]

Could they terraform mars and make the Mars day equal to Earth Day cause I think they’re only 36 minutes apart

[@DeanIllinger]

What does increasing the fuel tank size in Starship V2 have anything to do with how much thrust the Raptor engines output? Your technical credibility took minor hit with that one.

[@Waltonsucksatquiz]

Is it physical possible to harvest meteorites

[@jeffreydavis1846]

Space the Final frontier and SpaceX is getting closer to a real star ship like Star Trek 👈 The blueprints are there for the build keep looking up

[@isaiahonyedi]

This payload is giving me Battle royale's vibe😮

[@re1v3r]

All praise the Emperor of Mankind, beloved by all.

[@israelitenet]

Emergency!!! THE ONLY SOTUTION! Baffles will not work to prevent the fuel slushing problem, because the tanks of the starship system are too large. That is the only reason why the starship engines have been exploding every time. The solution: The tanks of Starship and Superheavy need 2 disk valves, expanding the diameter of each tank. One of the disks, the one on top, rotates above the contiguous disk to close the overlaping holes on the surface of the disks; to reduce the Size of the tank by dividing it, before any rotation or acceleration of the rocket. This will prevent slushings and protect the plumbing, if located 10% above the bottom section of each tank. Large telescopic pistons can be attached below the bottom of disk valves to control the fuel pressure as the piston expands into the fuel tank. I have built a model that works perfectly. The second disk valve can be located 10% below the front of the tank, to also protect the front of the tanks from the slushing forces. The gridfins are too flat and too small to be effective enough and will not be able to control the booster. Why is Elon not using four pins instead of three to secure each heat shield tyle? Four anchor points provide far more stability to secure a tyle, not three.What is more important than securing the heat shield? Four anchor points would eliminate the problems of tyles falling off the ship every time there is an engine ignition. Please get this message to Elon. Thank you. Also, Spacex needs 3 actuators to move the payload bay doors correctly, not two. They have only two now, one at each end of the payload bay. They need one at the center position. Three will guarantee that there will always be enough support to open and close the doors, even if one of the three fails. I know the spacex engineers can see these problems. It is like ignoring the elephant in the room. Musk needs to hire people who can be trusted and who will not continue accepting bribes from Jeff Bozo to sabotage Spacex.

[@Melkur1981]

I feel like Starship is slowly morphing into a spaceplane.

[@TsarHare]

no weapons

[@TheNonlinearLife]

Within 90 minutes? That must be a world record, if they get a launch license ready and find a rocket to launch the shuttle within that time frame?

[@rigdigwus]

im pretty sure it’s meant to be already in orbit and then drop in 90 minutes. no possible way you get a launch license that fast. so the concept is stupid af

[@stevenbaumann8692]

I think it's a bit too soon to be designing any new versions, since the original can't even achieve a stable orbit. Elon's plan to get to Mars is the same plan I came up with when I was 13. And as likely to come to fruition.

[@ristube3319]

5:38 Seems sadly similar to asbestosis and mesothelioma

[@TheScienceTruth-hr3zu]

it look like "real life tony stark" really want something

[@robertheinrich2994]

since they swapped to steel, I wonder why they still restrict themselves to 9m diameter. why not 12m or even 15 or 18m? just saying, with steel, they aren't really restricted, unlike with carbon fibers.

[@TheEvilmooseofdoom]

Because it's not so simple to just go wider, it would require a re-build of a lot of equipment and set them back years.

[@robertheinrich2994]

@@TheEvilmooseofdoom sure, they need a new launch pad, they need some new tools, but it is not as complicated as trying to make larger and larger carbon fiber parts. even 9m was complicated. but with steel, it's not a problem.

[@joeker1013]

Just watched the House committee for NASAs budget. Sigh, doesn't look good.

[@ristube3319]

8:04 Why does footage from 2002 look like it’s from 1902?!

[@high-captainofangbandgothm3926]

it doesn't look like 1902 not even close maybe early 90s world Trade centre blogs from new York City but not 1902

[@equinsuocha8905]

I don’t get it. They have already planned an upgrade before they can even get the original to work right?

[@nutbastard]

Yes, this is a principle of rapid prototyping. SpaceX was a nothing company 15 years ago and now are the leading payload to orbit provider, and they are making money hand over fist doing it. If you want the slow way of development just root for NASA and SLS... oh wait....

[@AmpleVagina]

Best part is no part. 30 engines doesn’t seem like the simple solution.

[@nutbastard]

Redundant engines allow for failures at the component level while also giving the best odds for mission success. Multiple smaller engines are also more efficient and easier to work with and offer more test cases.

[@walsterdoomit]

💥

[@jdlessl]

My question is, why taller rather than wider?

[@ronjon7942]

Drag?

[@nickolas4637]

Version 10 will be able to launch Earth into space.

[@rogerculver4511]

Cone of Silence for dust.

[@stefstefano6200]

dev is cooking

[@Waltonsucksatquiz]

Can you harvest meteorites

[@twida9]

Imagine being on top of this rocket. Very scary

[@allanrose3661]

They haven't gotten V2 to work yet. LOL

[@jacobbelfegor8761]

soo we will not get that huge window on top ? disapointing

[@RiverTripleSeven]

We probably will, this version is just the cargo version

[@djohannsson8268]

Artist rendition. Large Windows are a liability during re-entry. Easier to place small HD digital cameras internally bulkhead mounted through the stainless steel hull, behind small replaceable heat resistant ALON lenses. The command crew can then watch real time ship docking, refueling, landing, takeoff, reentry, cargo unloading, any critical view desired all from their command consoles.

[@nutbastard]

You're like the guy who complained that in-flight wifi wasn't working two days after it was introduced.

[@michaelreid2329]

I'm guessing now that the V3 has been announced that all lessons have been learnt on the V1 prototypes Congrats to SpaceX on their success.

[@SpirintX]

Until we can actually travel at the speed of light (which is impossible ) or anywhere near it, interstellar travel is just pointless !

[@SwallowAerospace]

sierra space cargo dump is just a resuply pod from helldivers 2

[@Blazingfireball977]

we really getting fortnite supply drops irl 😂

[@mattheide2775]

❤

[@NoMoneyG]

If they all stop blowing up, it might be impressive in the future.

[@foxguysumthing]

All KSP has taut me is: trust the process

[@pauljarvis1944]

Why the moon when we have so much more to explore about our own planet 6:23 ???

[@joz6683]

Elon Musk, the new Friedrich Wilhelm I of Prussia. Everything must be bigger.

[@butchthurman4685]

Are they really a starship?

[@jamescapps5231]

How are we going to make it through the Dome the permanent Dome I'm asking Elon Musk because I seen on a interview that you said we couldn't go to Mars because we can't make it through the Dome so what is really going on

[@francoluissotomayor5521]

Omg $2M per launch 200 tonnes= $5 per pound…!!! God Bless

[@AmericanCrusader222]

SpaceX always impresses the hell out of me

[@rickb.4168]

Simple things for simple minds.

[@ratratrat59]

Fully reusable? Not when they blow up or burn up. This simply translates to larger fireworks. SpaceX is great at everything except Starship.

[@TheEvilmooseofdoom]

Wow, you are really in way over your head.

[@ratratrat59]

@@TheEvilmooseofdoom Explain. Your words do not clearly communicate your point.

[@MM-sl1ik]

I leave comments and stuff

[@Eric_Tennant]

.. my two dots