Emotional Reasoning, Case Analysis, Rule of Threes

[@garypuckettmuse]

Haha so when he first said "prior life experiences" I heard experiences in a prior life and I thought, Professor, you never cease to surprise and delight! Seriously, these lectures are excellent and Professor Rose has a great personality. Thank you, Professor Rose.

[@TheCorrectionist1984]

Never actually met Professor Rose, but I've stolen so much of his sh!t I should be charged with a crime. 🥂

[@DeanDangerousTDD7]

(My Comment pertains to what a judge is allowed to do or not allowed to do duringthe process of her giving the jury there instructions. This is obviously after closing arguements have been made by both sides, the defence & the state D.A. prosecutor) 99% of the time, don't ever trust that a public deffender is going to actually work for you. He or she works for the system! He or she assigned to your case does not work for not you! (orruption in the American criminal court system is more common then most people would like to believe. I took a felony case to trial before and the judge in my case, ( -Judge- -Gail- -Z- -Bardach- )( -superior- -courtroom#6- -hamilton-county- IN ) she added a new charge to my case & she did this after both sides finished there final arguements! (((So final arguements had allready took place, the trial was over, all that was left, was for the judge to read jury instructions on the process to deliberate & decide innocent or guilty.))) In the process of reading & explainning jury instructions to the jury for jury deliberation. She litterately took part of my defense that my lawyer used to prove my innocents and turnt it into a new charge. I started the trial facing 2 felonies & by the end of trial, just before the jury was to deliberate. I was facing three felonies. Every charge that someone faces in a criminal case. Each one has a cause# So how is the judge adding a new charge to my case during the jury trial not corruption. especially giving the timing of when she decided to add it. She added the new charge at the end. She added it at a time, when there was no chance for me & my lawer to defend my innocents against it, explainning my side of the situation. Her adding the new charge at anytime during the jury trial would have been criminal malpractice but the fact that she added a new charge to my case at the end of my trial proceeding. A new charge that had no cause# attached to it. WELL THATS CRIMINAL The inntensions of that act by the judge, even though probably not PREMEDITATED before the initial trial proceedings started. WAS CRIMINAL The intennsions were carefully thought out, it was criminal & unmoral. the intennsions were Purpossed & intended towards unjustly & wrongfully convicting a citizen. Her intennsions were purposed & intended towards taking away a innocent citizen's freedom & his right to a fair & unbiased trial hearing to prove his innocents. but speaking of PREMEDITATED I did find it odd that a bar tender from the very bar that called the law on me in the very case that I was fighting was selected to come in for possible jury duty on my case. 0utta around 330,000 residents of -hamiltoncounty- whats the odds of that happening? (American_Intermediary) I Thank God & I THANK MY PEERS, (((the citizens that were on my jury))) because they saw through the judges unjust behavior & her decision to try and trick the jurors. Ultimately finding me to be not guilty of all charges, even the one that she added in at the end of the trial. Thankyou also to my paid attorney Lawerence M. Hansen ! Without him & instead if I would have had to have had a public defender. I would have been forced to admit guilt to crimes that I didnt commit. Even though I was not guilty & was found to be not guilty by my peers in that court room sitting on the jury !!!! THIS IS CORRUPTION THAT HAS GOT TO BE EXPOSED TO THE PUBLIC ! IT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED by the legal court system ! ( sealed & withheld from the public , TRANSCRIPTS of the jury trial proceedings ) This is an example of corruption that can be proven through evidence. Evidence thats being held and unlawfully seized from the publics view at the -Hamilton County- IN. Court House. ( sealed & withheld from the puclic , TRANSCRIPTS of the jury trial proceedings ) ( -judge- -gail- -z- -bardach- -superior- -courtroom#6- -HamiltonCounty- IN. ) She has recently retired from being a judge. This trial that I am referencing above, it took place around aug/sept of 2010 My charges were possesion of a controlled substance and theft. I can't remember the name of the new charge that the judge added to my case but I do remember that when she was explaining it to the jury she said that the new charge for them to deliberate on was a separate charge from the theft and then she went on to explain. That the act of taking something from another individual was the new charge and rather or not if I was playing or was planning on giving it back or not. That did not effect the new charge nor should it be considered when deciding guilty. ( -judge- -gail- -z- -bardach- -superior- -courtroom#6- -HamiltonCounty- IN. ) she has recently retired ( 7/1/2022 ) from being a judge. -judge- -gail- -z- -bardach- gave a interview to the The -Noblesville- -Times- on june 22 2022 This is a quote that she gave in that interview & I quote "Another thing that has been especially rewarding has been conducting jury trials, I love interacting with people & letting them see how the system really works. Jurors often tell me, after our trials, what a positive and educational experience their jury duty has been." End quote