@Skygoers 44 minutes ago This half-baked guy has the audacity to later criticize the Tibetan tradition as having misinterpreted and hence polluted the kalackakra tradition based on some very superficial argument. Does the Jonang tradition really wants to associate with this guy and give him a platform to defame its own tradition?
@alipiofernandes19 ай бұрын
Sincerely, please explain how a master, who takes a demonic lord as a guru, can truly be recognized as a Kalachakra Vajraacarya?
@Skygoers Жыл бұрын
Niraj Kumar is trying to explain Kalachakra in accordance with his Textual understanding which is absurd. Many of the tantric teachings are self-secret, hidden in secret tantric codes or language. Only a guru who has an unbroken transmission in the tradition can reveal those secrets. The importance of guru in the tantric tradition is common to Hinduism and Buddhism and he should know better. His arrogance leads to make a simple but grave mistake right in the beginning. He identifies the “other kalackakra” as the “symbolic universe” when the text he read clearly stated that the “the other Kalachakra” refers to the practice of the Kalachakra path such as initiations, creation stage and completion stage etc.
@alipiofernandes19 ай бұрын
The Kalachakra tantra is not secret, it's an explicit tantra.