Enhanced MARTINGALE ROULETTE System - Improving your probabilities

Check out this more effective use of the Martingale Roulette System.
My Favourite Casino with the best Roulette Betting Ratios: casinomatchmak...
🎰😍Quiz to find your perfect Casino ➡ casinomatchmak...
If you're intrigued by the allure of consistently winning with the martingale system, this improved strategy might just change your game.
The Martingale System is renowned globally, promising to recoup losses and secure profits. But where does it fall short? What keeps it from being the infallible money-making powerhouse it claims to be? Stick with us as we unravel the limitations and introduce a new system that offers a higher probability of success.
Before we explore this enhanced martingale strategy, we revisit why the traditional Martingale system doesn't live up to its billing.
Assuming we're playing at a reputable casino with a 100 to 1 table limit ratio, we delve into the probability game. The traditional Martingale system reaches the table limit after 7 losses, with a probability of 0.9%. However, with our triple Martingale system, it takes only 5 losses to hit the limit, with a lower probability of 0.53%.
Why is this an improvement? We've reduced the likelihood of losing two dozen bets in a row (35.1% probability) compared to losing an even chance bet seven times consecutively (48.6% probability). This not only increases our chances of winning but also minimizes the risk of hitting table limits.
For those seeking even more favorable ratios, some online casinos offer ratios exceeding 1 to 1,000. These ratios significantly lower the probability of hitting the maximum bet, ensuring a more prolonged and successful gameplay.
Join the discussion in the comments and share your thoughts on why you would choose this better Martingale system over the traditional one. Plus, explore more intriguing roulette techniques in our next video. 🎰💰 #RouletteStrategy #MartingaleSystem #martingaleroulette

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

🎰😍Quiz to find your perfect Casino ➡ casinomatchmaker.com/quiz/

[@viettuannguyen3]

super underrated roulette channel! another solid video!

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Thank you kindly

[@arcanisomnipotent5794]

First of all, solid video very very well explained. The system works, honestly I implemented by observation and did the math mostly by intuition. Then i looked for this video i can say is 100%correct. I'm glad to share some findings on my experience I believe the best is using on live roulette no software roulette. Make your move only after two humbers in the same sector landed, example 3 and 11 then go for the other two sectors 12-24 and 25-36 You always have to be aware of zero breaks in that is bad shit if you are on loosing progression. Then, in my experience it's good to stop at 3 or 4 loss, 5 to 7 can be too much to handle, and zero maybe the deal breaker and it does happens. assuming your bank role its healthy you will recover on the following runs. It also works with columns but colors are mixed so there is a column with more red numbers than black and viceversa. If you see q color streak it's better no to bet at all. After, all those considerations I see most players lack one thing, Patience. It takes from 1 to 2 hours to double my money. You really have to be on ice mode to triple or make 4-6 times your money. The best is to take breaks, start slow go stronger as game matures and retire when you double come back later or tomorrow. I recommend few hours if playing, no distractions and focus mindset.

[@Chilllstorm]

Just tried this at my local casino, was very nerve racking, minimum is $5, it hit 3rd dozen three times in a row, finally won my fourth bet of $270, if I lost that my next bet would have to be $810, made me very nervous, after 2 hours of game play I was up $75, and walked out

[@djlaw12]

becuase you need to cover at least 9 spins to net positive. 10 is even better. This post didn't test properly.

[@atmoore74]

@@djlaw12 all that for $75 profit. definitely wasn't worth it

[@celebrationsevents]

A wait 3, progress 6 on 2 dozen nets me 275/hr. 75 over 2 hrs is def not worth it.

[@ismabeatz2715]

@@atmoore74 It was definitly worth it, you people don't understand that you have to take some risks if you want to be rewarded... You guys want to risk $1 to earn $1.000.000... That's not how the world works

[@dannydo5996]

Yeah. I don't think this system works as planned. I've tried the double plus 1 system: 1,3,7,15, 31... I ve faced 10 losses in a row and burned out of bankroll quickly . Very risky.!

[@TarmendranMaylvahanamcool]

I have seen a single dozen never comes for more than 14 times 😂

[@scottcronan4316]

That why he's playing 2 dozens and of course one dozen can hit 7 or more times it just doesn't happen often

[@cosmickamikaze7475]

I think statistically it happens every hour or so, where the same dozen hits 10+ times

[@craighohmann9534]

I've seen it not hit on dozens and columns over 25 times up to 30+ times. Losing all my money, thinking, that would be impossible.

[@TarmendranMaylvahanamcool]

@@craighohmann9534 true sorry for your loss mate. I got loss too thinking should I quit gambling haha

[@scottcronan4316]

@@craighohmann9534 nothing is impossible just the other day I saw 14 come up 4 times in a row. I was betting on the other 5 double streets 😳

[@kevvwarren]

This is amazing. If you're playing on a table with high limits, the even chance bets are much more lucrative with this system. Also, if you're following the two recent winners on the dozen bets I believe that gives you a better shot of winning more often and not going on a prolonged losing streak.

[@timmyvthetraineater6332]

This is the best strategy in the world. Thank you to whoever created this channel or made this video I am a nerd and I love you for breaking this math.

[@PatternBetting-LogicRules]

I was very sceptical of a strategy calling for the bet to be tripled after a loss, so I modified a Euroulette RNG model I created years ago to put it to the test, and by golly, the Triplingale beat 25,000 spins, bringing in a reasonable return without too much risk. The downside is that it needs a very wide betting spread, greater than any on offer at casinos in the real world. Bummer, but at least it is mathematically sound. Good work! Now tell me where I can find a casino that allows a 1 to 2,500 spread and I'll be good to go.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Love the name Triplingale! I should have called it that. Yes you need to find a table with large betting ratios. I don't know where you live but the best I have found is Goldenbet. Here's my review, you will see a short video which table to play. casinomatchmaker.com/goldenbet/

[@GRice999]

Just change tables to one with higher limits, like in the high limit room.

[@Jon-hz8mq]

Bet on one dozen, martingale your loss 3 times. If you lose on the third, then bet the second dozen, meaning 2 dozens and increase the bet so that way, you recover all the losses from the previous spins plus the profit. And then martingale from there on losses. Reset after you win to your initial bet on one of the dozens. Wash rinse repeat.

[@kemikemi756]

Going to try this straight away. 2, 6, 18, 54, 162, 486 = a 728 bankroll. Should be enough ? How about this : always stay the bet on [13-24], Swich between [1-18] and [25-36] each bet no matter win or lose ? That sequence seemed to work on my previous method which was increasing bet by 1 unit and not decreasing until on profit again ~

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Yea sounds pretty good to me! Make sure your casino has the limits to let you do that

[@caseydupre5376]

I’d add 50 cents and a dollar before that too, just to give it some extra chances

[@briandempsey4291]

No!!!! You need to have $1456 you have to account for BOTH bets! And you have to watch out because some tables not only have a table limit but also a max of the total bets. So you might only be able to have a max of $500 total bet so you could only triple each bet until hits at most $250.

[@briandempsey4291]

The math in this video is so messed up! In your 7 bet cycle it would cost you $2186 to be able to do that on 2 dozens. And you would lose 1 out of 1666 times! Meaning you would win $1, 1665 times for a total of $1665 and lose $2186 once. So if you just happen to lose on the 1666 time you’d have exactly $1665 in your hand and be negative $521.

[@dorkusmalorkus444]

I'm curious to know what happens if a spin lands on either a 0 or 00, during a double-down?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

It would be classed as a loser. I did the calculations including a single zero. I don't advise playing at double 00 wheels

[@dorkusmalorkus444]

@@CasinoMatchmaker But if you played either a single or double zero table, would you still double down if the spin didn't land on your colour?

[@h4ckerangelo]

@@dorkusmalorkus444 Yes, because the idea is to recover that loss and make the initial profit. All of these systems are very risky, because even with low probabilities of a losing streak, once it happens you lose everything

[@datsme8986]

Yes. I truly use this method and also the Fibonacci, but I think this time, Casinos are using AIs now, they can prdedict my moves.. it wiped out twice my bankroll.🤔 At the start, I was doubling my gains, but later on after almost an hour playing they will notice our strategy.. That's why their games are predetermined and rigged if it's not on live shows with hosts. 🤔

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Where do you play? That sounds very suspicious perhaps look to play somewhere else?

[@APoliak]

@@CasinoMatchmakerevery online casino do the same, is the provider (evolution or other), but in live casino with host, they take you forced out by the guards jejej.

[@eagle4x638]

I noticed the same thing too, but a lot of it depends on the software the online casino is using. I was losing a lot when using BetSoft, but one strategy to postpone/minimize the losses was to use a "follow the winner strategy", for example, if ball hits in 1st dozen, bet on 1st and 2nd, if lands on 2nd, bet of 2nd and 3rd, if lands on 3rd, bet on 3rd and 1st...this throws off the software, but eventually, it will catch up with you. I've since read that BetSoft is one of the lowest rated software companies but NetEnt and Microgaming are two of the best. I've tried NetEnt and had much more wins.

[@Rick-w2o]

lol, they don't need AI to wipe out your bankroll using any system.

[@iamnighthawk]

I love your Fibonaci on 1 dozen strategy, but this I feel would be pretty good too...which of the 2 strats do you like better?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Hey mate. Thank you. Personally I like the Fibonacci dozen because the reward gets bigger the longer your losing streak. I think both are solid strategies tho

[@thimirajanith6387]

you dont have inside bets some stratagies ?

[@mikejay9838]

More important than percentage chance to lose, is the ratio of odds of losing:loss amount -- this is the true comparison with the EC bets vs. DZ+DZ. Even more important is, how are we going to recover the money we lose, especially considering that losing is a certainty and loss clumps occurring less than expectation can be legion (negative variance)? It seems the answer we come up with is to keep the losses as low as possible, to be better able to recover them, whenever and how over often they occur.

[@MightyJabroni]

Phantasizing about systematically recovering losses, when playing a game with negative EV, is kinda pointless.

[@mikejay9838]

@@MightyJabroni If you say you can't, well, you are right.

[@MichaelSaif]

The problem is that if you are likely to lose your bankroll on average every 188 spins. That loss will likely be more than the profits you have made on the other 187 spins. So it's not a winning strategy. You might get lucky for a while, but you will get hacked sooner rather than later.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Kind of.. But its not 188 spins, its 188 attempts at the srategy

[@sparacino69]

Is it possible for 2 people to use martingale on opposite colors and both be money ahead in the end?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

There is a variation to that system that people use. Watch this video..kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y6Cpp2Vpaph8pdk

[@ganesh8495]

Percentage calculation is very good Is there any formula to find out 7 losses of even bets occurred 1 time and will not occur again in that sample of 100 spins

[@ManoharReddy26]

I tried it on stake, and lost all the money within a 2 minutes

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Oh crap! What are the ratio limits like on Stake?

[@onlygameplay134]

Do you know of any incident when online players got banned for using some variations of the martingale system from legitimate bigger sites? It seems too good to be true how easy is to farm money with these strategies. Don't online casinos ban you when you win too big or regularly?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Hello. Casinos are within their rights to ban you if they want. But because there is a possibility you will hit a losing streak and lose a big portion of your bankroll, then most of them won't ban you. I recommend playing at bigger casinos so that your constant small wins don't really hurt their profits

[@onlygameplay134]

@@CasinoMatchmaker Thank you for your answer! It's help a lot.

[@NuyiTravel]

In live casino I have the same dozen comming more than 10 times. if you got cuaght in such a situation then all your will be gone very quickly.

[@itsmeyourfriend1]

Just lost 200 dollars in roullete, no regret . When i play, i consider the money that is already lost .

[@andreaskrbyravn855]

Because you only get 1 usd everything win a lot of wins compared to losses if it happens. But ye its a fine strategy still

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Agreed, small consistent wins but a very small chance of losing. When you do lose.. You're in trouble

[@deanjvr8390]

imagine having a team of 3 or 5 buddies that can add to the max limit or don't play until you get 3 or 4 fake losses then start playing.

[@web3wallbanks]

When we going to the Casino mate ? Haha

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Give me the time and place Mr Wallbanks!

[@djlaw12]

7 levels isn't near enough progression. Why aren't you looking at an actual database of how often it actually goes to 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 in a row without hitting a dozen? This doesn't cover nearly enough and is just an ad. Spam.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Why wouldn't I look at at the mathematical probabilities. Your spam

[@djlaw12]

@@CasinoMatchmaker because probabilities don't look at what actually happens. How often does it actually go to 13 in a row without a dozen hitting? or 12. or 11... It's relevant and affects the annual net. You didn't cover it, because you didn't run it against a real database which if you're being thorough, you should have before involving money. Probability is only one aspect. Bankroll is another. Testing another. Incomplete and worthless post.

[@shanksters4898]

This will 100% get you into trouble. I’ve tried it several times and never got far at all before bottoming out. Fibonacci on 1 dozen works WAY better. Especially if you can wait to start the betting on a dozen that hasn’t hit in at least 5-6 spins. I bet 12 progressions, so if I wait until a dozen hasn’t hit for let’s say 6 times, that means I’ve got 18 spins for that dozen to hit.

[@MightyJabroni]

Martingale is terrible. It just trades many miniscule wins against spread out losses, that completely wipe you out. Numbers like "just a 0,351%" probability give a warped sense of security. Because you play one turn at a time, the likelihood of going bust quickly increases with every successive miss. So it becomes more volatile pretty fast.

[@djlaw12]

Agreed, 12 will get you there. I had to cover 9 spins to hit a consistent profit of ~$275/hr. Waiting 6, then progressing 6 is too rare to make it worth a net per hour though.

[@scottcronan4316]

My casino has. $0.50 min and $20,000 max but i don't have a bankroll to bet that big

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Holy crap that's epic ratio's. Is this online or at a live casino?

[@scottcronan4316]

@@CasinoMatchmaker online all the ones here in Michigan are pretty similar to that. I know that's draft kings I think betmgm is the same.. I don't really pay attention to the table limits cuz they are all way more then I have... I was playing Baccarat for $1 base bet one night and there was a guy flat betting 25,000 per hand he had made 300k doing that the day before

[@MightyJabroni]

My casino has. $0.50 min and $20,000 Yeah, but surely not on the same table. XD A high roller table with 20,000 max. has like a 100-ish min.

[@scottcronan4316]

@@MightyJabroni same table but they raised the minimum a few weeks ago to $1 on single 0 wheel but it's still $0.50 on double 0

[@scottcronan4316]

@@CasinoMatchmaker on line bet MGM but it's only available in Michigan and a few weeks ago they raised the minimum on the single 0 table to $1 but the other table the 00 is still $0.50

[@senseihitmanwayofkempo8305]

The Mitchelgale😂

[@kemikemi756]

🤣 aw god no

[@iamnighthawk]

🤣👍so true!

[@smfvmd]

Who does the splendid cartoons?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

That would be me thank you

[@ekemboik]

Will not beat Fibonacci system. I prefer this 1000 times compared to martingale

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Fibonacci Is arguably the best system around !

[@GRice999]

Perhaps you could explain how someone smart enough to know about a Fibonacci sequence is also dumb enough to think they can beat roulette.

[@johnlaurencechan3035]

it happens to me 0.9 percent

[@kevinhurd370]

The 1 to 100 ratio makes sense. However, if you are betting two dozens at a time, then you are betting 2, 6, 18, 54... and can only last 4 losses until reaching the table limit. The video mentions 5 losses until this occurs, which is incorrect.

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

Hey mate. The ratios are normally per bet, So you could have $100 on the first dozen AND $100 on the second dozen.

[@kevinhurd370]

@@CasinoMatchmaker ok. My bad on the misunderstanding. Thank you for clarifying. Cheers.

[@riccardoscalisi8942]

Risking 1k to make 1 is beyond insanity...are you serious?

[@CasinoMatchmaker]

You're probability of getting to that scenario is extremely small

[@riccardoscalisi8942]

@@CasinoMatchmaker If you examine the history of spins of the various wheels you'll notice it happens not so rarely

[@oussemamrayah7789]

no system can guarantee winning 😢

[@cameronbaillie3014]

That's why it says " Improving the probability"

[@oussemamrayah7789]

@@cameronbaillie3014 if 0 accurate in any thing be sure it will Hit this time or another and make you loose everything

[@kein4697]

No more any strategies of any youtube channel. How the outcome you will lose and bankrupt ☠️ . Don't Gamble

[@kiddtuffnuff]

pussy