I love how things just get broken up and dispersed into distant parts of the sentence
@paulamarina042 ай бұрын
i feel the fact that hypoanalytic actually means "extremely non-analytic" just add to the cursedness
@Pzyroh2 ай бұрын
This is the best conlang circus submission I've ever seen
@enricobianchi44993 ай бұрын
I think this should win. It's just exceptional. I love the orthography. I love the numeral system. I love everything about it.
3 ай бұрын
At the risk of being perceived as a contrarian: this language is not cursed at all. It's rather beautiful and harmonic, actually, truly a poet's dream. Making it tonal was probably a misstep though, that doesn't fit the general vibe very well.
@DJruslan4ic2 ай бұрын
If you make a Slavic languages-inspired colang then don't be suprised when it turns out melodical (I mean, Ukrainian is 2nd most melodical language after Italian)
@dn7949Ай бұрын
@@DJruslan4ic This is a joke, right?
@DJruslan4icАй бұрын
@@dn7949 why do you take it as a joke? Is this bait?
@dn7949Ай бұрын
@@DJruslan4ic There are no "melodic" elements to Ukrainian. Ukrainian is a dialect of a much older Russian language, where Russian changed and developed, Ukrainian barely changed at all. If you go back 3-600 years ago, it is impossible to distinguish Ukrainian from Russian.
@artemivanov35203 ай бұрын
Ну братишь, ну это прям сильно. Один из самый интересных конлэнгов на моей памяти, так ещё и кириллицей. Удачи тебе!
@oddbirdMusicАй бұрын
If you don't know what it's actually doing, it sounds so very much like a normal language. If you do know, it feels like using a scrabble bag as pocket sand.
@wynnexedАй бұрын
you win this comment section on the basis of being completely right
@sashavasilyev30002 ай бұрын
it kind of feels like vietnamese written with cyrillic
@vnXunАй бұрын
As a Vietnamese I think this sounds like Mandarin, I guess it's because of the tones.
@novikmark2 ай бұрын
Great video, great language It sounds like Russian-Chinese mix and I love it
@AgainMlinyАй бұрын
As a Russian, yes.
@rossakane9363 ай бұрын
first off, I have to say, while I barely understand what's going on, I am just laughing from the absolute chaos of having all the words? whatever they are, flying about due to the operations. While this conlang design might seem totally unnatural (and well, it pretty much is) some aspects of it eeriely reminds me of these bipartite verbs which are composed of two dependent morphemes which each can not stand alone but can exist if they are said in combination with eachother. If you search "Bipartite verbs in languages of western North America" you can find the paper on the Academia Edu site. if you're having too much trouble, I could try uploading the pdf and linking to it tho I think youtube doesn't like it when someone posts links in the comments. Honestly, if I had more skill, I'd love to see how I or someone should attempt to natural evolve such a perpetually circumpositional-based syntax. It's so interesting and unique.
@enricobianchi44993 ай бұрын
Tbh english phrasal verbs do sometimes associate meaning to the order of two words that make a single lexeme. Think of "to turn on smn." vs. "to turn smn. on" :)
@Unknown_Planet2 ай бұрын
2:48 Bro has literally added bipkas (бипки) to a language 💀
@ndrechtseiter2 ай бұрын
Так вот что было в том чемодане...
@arust51472 ай бұрын
when you said "balanced ternary" I cheered so hard best base
@TheVurnPL2 ай бұрын
I don't see how it's "one morph per two words". Surely it's two morphemes per one word, it's just the words are not continuous (just like morphemes are in non-concatenative Semitic morphology)
@ArcheoLumiere2 ай бұрын
I understand why this language is cursed now, but it is still somehow beautiful.
@АленаРумская3 ай бұрын
Хорошо снимаете, спасибо за видео! Вот бы еще просмотров больше) тут или ждать от ют алгоритмов снисхождения или юзать платную ютифайраскрутку
@neko2718_2 ай бұрын
Cyrillic looks so unusual in this language
@feanorofsunspear23202 ай бұрын
I think you could have done a better job at explaining how the operations work. Especially when talking about subtrees in the beginning it would have been very helpful to show what you mean , and in the end you could have gone through the whole composition of one sentence fragment or at least compared the trees to the sentence (in a single slide)
@kalinkavelinova25292 ай бұрын
If Inglish was fonetikally konsistent:
@terdragontra89002 ай бұрын
yooooooo I love balanced ternary, I got so excited when I saw you added that, even though it isn’t particularly important to the language. this one is cursed in a very cool way, good job
@SunroseStudios2 ай бұрын
absolutely love the idea of going so analytic that every morpheme takes multiple words to convey, very fun!
@CrysolasChymera21173 ай бұрын
Great Job, amazing. It really could fit into the language family of the real world with its peoples and ways of perceiving different from other populations.
@AK-vx4dy3 ай бұрын
Mindblown, even for Polish speaker ;) Romanization looks like somewhat failed Thai print ;)
@приколиЧЧЧ2 ай бұрын
The conlang circus is back! Very cool submission, would be nice to see some more info about this project. Kinda cursed, yet still, looks and sounds so unique...
@hya2in8Ай бұрын
this somehow even eviler than Goptjaam
@lolosharacarrot55072 ай бұрын
As a person, whose native language is Russian and who are very used to Russian letters, this looks even more cursed to me 💀
@joshuasims54213 ай бұрын
Very interesting, very cursed! One question: are there syllables which recur across lexemes? If so, are there some that have a common meaning, like a syllable which always occurs in the names of felids or something? Or are the two syllables in a word combined purely arbitrarily? I noticed one example in the vocabulary: їй - ы̌ыы̌ь: what kind; їйъ - гуць: what do (tr/intr) but I suppose that may be an exception given that these are function words. Excellent work truly scrambling the order of components! And I'm very glad to see balanced ternary featured! This is what a cursed conlang ought to be, one where I wonder for syntactic reasons if a human could natively acquire it.
@CaesiumFox3 ай бұрын
Thank you. I combined syllables by random. The case of їйъ - ы̆ыы̆ь and їйъ - гуць is just a coincidence, I noticed it during the edit. I desined my language with intention for it to have different morphs having their L or R-parts the same, but I was so carried away making silly syllables that almost every (if not every) syllable appears only once. This kinda weakens the point of having one morph per two words, because L and R parts start having meanings, but it can be fixed by just inventing new lexemes that reuse existing syllables or just mentioning that they can exist.
@joshuasims54213 ай бұрын
@@CaesiumFox Very interesting! Yeah, that's not a surprising consequence of having a small sample lexicon.
@wynnexedАй бұрын
glorious. I love the horrifying cyrillic
@kijeenki2 ай бұрын
i love the part where this language is understood
@DJruslan4ic2 ай бұрын
Sound like if a slavic language and Chinese had a child Also, how does this handle foreign words?
@willowpalecek70502 ай бұрын
Very cool to do an analytic instead of the normal highly fusional.
@TakeApartLabАй бұрын
its hypo analytic, as in below analytic
@JohnSmith-of2gu2 ай бұрын
I'm not good enough with linguistics to comprehend how this gets a morpheme/word ratio below one, but making possessives and compound words by interleaving the syllables of the components is cursed alright.
@AgainMlinyАй бұрын
you not only killed me with the use of ь and ъ, but also the romanization, greeting from RF! What is that word order. Overall, great language, I give it 3/3!
@avtomaticeskijrazdatcikgus27132 ай бұрын
It can't be just a coincidence that 3 out of 4 sentences of the translation start with "uwu".
@Rgrechko736Official2 ай бұрын
💀
@SupahTrunks72 ай бұрын
That romanization was so painful. And then we get hit with the cursive. (what does the sample text look like in cursive?)
@kalinkavelinova25292 ай бұрын
I added a new word for Toki Pona meaning "compression stockings": len noka suli wawa
@MrRhombus3 ай бұрын
Some letters seem out of place but alphabet’s fine regardless
@mollof78933 ай бұрын
Sounds a bit like Mandarin
@deltamico2 ай бұрын
No knot theory?
@ponnnnn2 ай бұрын
I love how it goes, but it looks similar to lojban for me.
@manuchi-nuchi3 ай бұрын
yes, pretty european
@TaiFerret3 ай бұрын
Is there no word for otter?
@CaesiumFox3 ай бұрын
Just invented: river otter: шы - ѕайъ sea otter: каь - лань