Enter The Matrix - 19 - New meta, who dis?

[@joeladkins1046]

Pumba tell us how you really feel

[@tonynaranjo2982]

sounds accurate, the potencial armies to phase out at the bottom.

[@dmvdh4270]

You’re the best guys! Totally wrong of course, but still the best 😊

[@gregmaginnity]

Very engaged.

[@40KStoics-pu2fb]

Good job fellas. I enjoy the expert commentry but find the emotive language unhelpful. When experts talk about trash units, or units that are 'broken' or 'bent'. It would be better to talk about units that are poor or that over perform. The use of emotive language is not helpful and forms a polorised view. Just my view but I get it all the time from my own group who accuse each others armies of being 'bent' when they mean very good. The issue is that the use of emotive terms erodes relationships and makes players wary of using or not using armieas that have a reputation attached for fear of being mocked.

[@tonynaranjo2982]

like GSC new codex ... GW team B filled the codex with poor units, so we have a poor codex while we get poor in the process while collecting a super expensive army

[@michaellangford4989]

They are chatting freely - they are not being paid. I disagree with your comment. Their show their personality let it run. Appreciate all their insights and could not care less if they use emotive or logical language.

[@40KStoics-pu2fb]

@@michaellangford4989 Chatting freely aminst friends is fine. They have an audience that are easily influenced and deserve to be provided with accurate facts that can be processed without bias. I too enjoyed their insights and their expertise.