Enthalpy

  Рет қаралды 6,457

Physical Chemistry

Physical Chemistry

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 20
@esoto1386
@esoto1386 3 жыл бұрын
1:50 In the H definition, where does the initial extra PV comes from?
@PhysicalChemistry
@PhysicalChemistry 3 жыл бұрын
That's just how we choose to define H. The reason we choose to define it that way is so that (as shown in the next few lines) it works out to be the same as the heat for a constant-pressure process.
@esoto1386
@esoto1386 3 жыл бұрын
Ok, thank you!
@PunmasterSTP
@PunmasterSTP Күн бұрын
I always struggled with understanding how exactly internal energy and enthalpy were different from each other. Knowing that dH = đq under constant pressure, and that the PV in the definition of enthalpy helps cancel out the PV lurking in the internal energy, definitely help!
@markpwoodward
@markpwoodward 2 жыл бұрын
Minor point. In your derivation of dH, you mentioned "reversible" as a step to make -P_ext*dV and P*dV cancel, but this confuses the issue (i.e. does dH = dq still hold for irreversible processes). Since pressure is constant, the derivation still holds, P=Pext. So maybe just skip the "rev." label and description.
@PhysicalChemistry
@PhysicalChemistry 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, that's an excellent point. Constant P is enough for this to be true, and reversibility is not needed. Thanks very much for the comment.
@adetunjidaniel5064
@adetunjidaniel5064 2 жыл бұрын
@@PhysicalChemistry then does this make the equation dh=dq untrue for a reversible reaction, since p is never constant in such reaction because p=nrt/v(and the v changes)
@PhysicalChemistry
@PhysicalChemistry 2 жыл бұрын
@@adetunjidaniel5064 You're right: dH ≠ đq for processes in which P is not constant (because there is nonzero PV work)
@herrhelmerich
@herrhelmerich 9 ай бұрын
Then how can we arrive at the dH=đq_p? If mechanical equilibrium between the system and the surroundings (or reversibility) is not assumed, how can P_ext be equal to P, which seems to be a necessary step in the derivation? And if reversibility is assumed, we seem to be deliberately breaking the condition of the constancy of pressure with which the derivation was begun in the first place. Could you please help me out?
@AshokKumar-kn9ku
@AshokKumar-kn9ku 3 жыл бұрын
At 2:20 with respect to what we are taking differential change
@PhysicalChemistry
@PhysicalChemistry 3 жыл бұрын
Nothing! It's a differential, not a derivative. Differentials (like dx) are not the same as derivatives (dy/dx). For a derivative, you do need to specify what other variable you are taking the derivative with respect to: for example, it is the change in y that happens when you make a small change in x. But a differential is just a small change. dx is just a small change in x. In this case, dH is any change in H, for any reason. Since H depends on U and P and V, then the small change dH might be because of a change in U or a change in P or a change in V.
@AshokKumar-kn9ku
@AshokKumar-kn9ku 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot
@joshg.6536
@joshg.6536 Жыл бұрын
Great work! But i do not get the step: converting atm and L to 8.3145 J and 0.0802 L*atm? Thanks :)
@PhysicalChemistry
@PhysicalChemistry Жыл бұрын
You can use the conversion 1 L atm = 101.325 J and you will get the same answer. The conversion I used is just a little trick I use to keep from having to memorize too many constants. You likely already know that the gas constant is 8.3145 J / (mol K). And also that it is 0.08206 L atm / (mol K). So those two values are equal to each other. And we can use them as the conversion factor to convert units of J to L atm.
@نبأفؤادعبدالستارداوود
@نبأفؤادعبدالستارداوود 3 жыл бұрын
why we used 3/2 in H law
@PhysicalChemistry
@PhysicalChemistry 3 жыл бұрын
The internal energy of an ideal gas is U = 3/2 nRT. Here's the video where this is obtained: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qXqZemaAj5mnhpY
@GulzarAhmad-sw1kh
@GulzarAhmad-sw1kh 2 жыл бұрын
If H = U+PV, doesn't this mean that enthalpy is not heat but a mix of heat & work? Explain, plz.
@PhysicalChemistry
@PhysicalChemistry 2 жыл бұрын
Remember the caveat that enthalpy is heat *at constant pressure*. Under other conditions, it does have contributions from both heat and work. It just happens that, at constant pressure, the PV term cancels the PV work that is hiding inside U.
@GulzarAhmad-sw1kh
@GulzarAhmad-sw1kh 2 жыл бұрын
@@PhysicalChemistry BUT H has been derived from 1st law as below. dq = du+pdv = du+d(pv)=d(u+pv)=dH While you have expanded the H (derived from 1st law) and then plugged in 1st law again?
@PhysicalChemistry
@PhysicalChemistry 2 жыл бұрын
The step where you say P dV = d(PV) is only true when P is constant. (Thus, your equation dq = dH is only true at constant pressure.) I'm not quite sure what you were asking, but perhaps that helps.
Heat Capacity
14:14
Physical Chemistry
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Clausius Theorem
15:58
Physical Chemistry
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Правильный подход к детям
00:18
Beatrise
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Reversibility
9:27
Physical Chemistry
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Carnot Cycle
18:01
Physical Chemistry
Рет қаралды 27 М.
Irreversible Heat and Work
11:13
Physical Chemistry
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Pressure-Volume Work | Physical Chemistry I | 021
14:02
Professor Derricotte
Рет қаралды 13 М.
Enthalpy: Crash Course Chemistry #18
11:24
CrashCourse
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН
ENTHALPY and INTERNAL ENERGY in 12 Minutes!
11:52
Less Boring Lectures
Рет қаралды 33 М.
Enthalpy | Thermodynamics | Chemistry | Khan Academy
15:07
Khan Academy
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Joule-Thomson Effect
14:00
Physical Chemistry
Рет қаралды 81 М.
Helmholtz and Gibbs Free Energy | Physical Chemistry I | 046
13:55
Professor Derricotte
Рет қаралды 20 М.
The Joule-Thomson effect
11:00
Diego Troya
Рет қаралды 5 М.