Episode

Philosophize This! Clips: / @philosophizethisclips
Get more:
Website: www.philosophizethis.org/
Patreon: / philosophizethis
Find the podcast:
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/2Shpxw7...
RSS: www.philosophizethis.libsyn.org/
Be social:
Twitter: / iamstephenwest
Instagram: / philosophizethispodcast
TikTok: / philosophizethispodcast
Facebook: / philosophizethisshow
Thank you for making the show possible. 🙂 Today we begin our discussion of the philosophy of Martin Heidegger by looking at his roots in Phenomenology and his revolutionary concept of Dasein.
www.patreon.com/philosophizethis
www.philosophizethis.org
Thank you for wanting to know more today than you did yesterday. :)

[@robinbeckford]

For me, this is the best introduction to Heidegger I've heard. I thank you, and look forward to the next part.

[@telugu_science]

Best introduction ever heard about Heidegger , kudos thank you.

[@TheEthanAndKyleShow]

also: i would love a series on husserlian phenomenology.

[@sadiem6758]

TheEthanAndKyleShow agreed!

[@RecalibratedAxe]

@@sadiem6758 Merleau-Ponty

[@deab1253]

@@RecalibratedAxe Merleau-Ponty is, laconically, heidegger turned towards the /embodied/ being

[@RocknRolla1967]

the youtube account Absurd Being has a whole videoseries of explaining MP's phenomenology of perception per chapter :)

[@MrPipvampire]

Steven, before you, I always had an interest in philosophy and in you I have found my teacher. By listening to your lectures I have learnt so much over time and even found philosophers that I find truly helpful in life such as Deleuze, Hegel, Husserl and now Heidegger. Thanks for all these wonderful insights. You do them so darn well. Yes, I'm a Patreon.

[@GoddessStone]

Thank you, for being a wonderful teacher. Wise, humble, humorous, open, a drive to share something you hold important and welcome expansion to it. A congenial tone, one that speaks like a valued high school friend...shooting off ideas by the light of the moon. Cool...I'm so happy you are. I started listening to "Up on a Roof" by James Taylor before an episode, then I look out over Lake Constance to the lights of Switzerland across the water, and it's all good. Greetings from Germany everyone, and thank you for all the wisdom each of you gives, all the time...

[@thomasking4791]

Fantastic job. A gentle suggestion for an ep: Ernest Becker and the Denial of Death.

[@allisonstafford9119]

more husserl pls

[@anthonynewton7435]

I heard about this on Joe Rogan. Ironically its changed who I listen to at work now. Still love Joe but this is so much more.

[@Aritul]

Wow. I wasn't expecting Rogan to listen to this. Neat.

[@KingMinosxxvi]

Why did you have to ruin this by mentioning you heard about it on Joe Rogan...PFF

[@anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858]

_whom*_ _(see: objective pronoun)_ _I thought you meant Joe Rogan was talking about Heidegger. I'm thinking... I doubt that!_

[@TranscendentPhoenix]

Fucking shit man, don't bring that meathead shit in here, please. This is a podcast with a specific focus for people that actually like to think and learn

[@reimannx33]

Just from listening to part 1, I humbly think you are a brilliant teacher - articulate and able explain a specific concept not as a standalone, but as it relates to other concepts in philosophy very well without losing focus. This helps me understand the newly introduced concept contextually and relationally. I look forward to part 2. Thanks.

[@peepingcaddis]

Thank you. Reading Being and Time for the Nth time, and starting to understand - these videos help on many levels, especially when working in isolation - they help confidence in knowing I'm on the right track 🙂

[@cbysmith]

This was great, thank u. Heidegger is such a difficult read, and so this short intro has helped clarify how I might best proceed.

[@ViVeriVniversvmVivusVici]

Finally made it thru episode 100!

[@goodleshoes]

wooooah just found a good binge series, nice stuff!

[@BeyondBorders00]

Great to cover Heidegger. Please keep more videos coming. Awesome topic

[@TheEthanAndKyleShow]

this is excellent. great work! +1 subscriber

[@Sandra-hc4vo]

Thanks for posting these. I have been wanting to learn philosophy but been intimidated by how big the task seems to do so. This seems like a really approachable starting place.

[@m.g.9334]

hashtag team being :D I truly love your humor! Every Episode is beacon of deligt! Keep up the great work! I will support you on patreon! Thanks agin!

[@whatdupdoh]

Fantastic epilogue/outro for the episode.

[@elporras39]

Thank you for the amazing work, commenting from Spain where me and my class have just debated collectively about heidegger in a lesson. Have reached a far better comprehension of his topics in half an hour here.

[@amaris368]

Great episode!

[@prohmschool1040]

I love your work. Will search through your site in hope of finding pieces on the simulation theory, on karma, and on solipsism.

[@jr.fluffy1346]

Can you please do a full in depth series on phenomenology? I am a philo major at FSU, and this topic is never touched on, and it would be great to hear lectures on the subjects from you super in depth if possible. Thanks.

[@hamdounimohammed7406]

Thank you for, that's the best, can we have something on Bergson or Cassirer

[@laurabaracuhy4842]

Thank you so much

[@tyroy57]

Thanks, funny and accessible.

[@nathanborghese3061]

More Husserl please!!

[@valentinahasbun9176]

man you are incredible

[@DirtyBottomsPottery]

This reminds me of the character Odo from Star Trek: Deep Space 9. He is a changeling/shapeshifter who can take on any form he pleases. Eventually he made his way back to his own people. His leader teaches him what it means to be a rock.

[@jac093020]

Do Jayden smith

[@user-ue9vk1sy7x]

thanks could you possibly do something on diogenes and his perceptions on life

[@sotiristriantogiannis5737]

Now we’re talking....!

[@mariannabeepdlue2816]

Hello id like a series on husserlian phenomenology please and thank you!

[@kerrisarahthornton5226]

the thing is... people have thought about this before... This is exactly the ways of thinking that advanced meditators use of self-inquiry when trying to attain enlightenment. It's just the approach is different. Where Heidegger is performing this thought in a philosophical context, Buddhist monks, Hindu monks, etc, have being engaged in this model for millennia. Self inquiry meditation is investigating the "I AM" presence, who is the "I" that is experiencing this. If you can go beyond that you will experience the shift in your perception of life - and it will be an experience not just an intellectual understanding. it requires a lot of discipline to train the mind to get to that level - and you do not have to belong to any faith to do it, they just happened to be doing this for years.

[@marb3399]

Are you planning on doing Julius Evola?

[@A11mighty]

@TheBmo4538 You first

[@sieltan5618]

I dunno if they’re as rigorous in their thought as the people you’ve discussed but I wonder if you’d have anything to say on Simone Weil or Georges Bataille

[@arthurgreene4567]

The rest of the talk is stunning, though -

[@krinkle909]

This was wonderful!!! But you did not explain Heidegger's concept of Das Sein (being). Maybe have another lecture Heidegger 2 Also, I was wondering why are you inside if you're an extravert? Are you sick or are you too disappointed with social interaction because the mass majority of people can't think?

[@pavlovkuki6616]

Husserl's Phenomenology Please...

[@KB-gd3gg]

For a video called Phenomenology and Dasein, I am on minute 22/31 and we have barely mentioned Heidegger.

[@davidblum292]

Isn't this the Buddhist idea of object and subject being one only stated 2000 years earlier?

[@lucasheijdeman2581]

Even before that advaita vedanta hinduism

[@davidblum292]

@@lucasheijdeman2581 thank you for your reply something new to study and discover

[@lucasheijdeman2581]

@@davidblum292 no problem dude enjoy!

[@tonysanzone7677]

what does Heidegger mean by Transcendence?

[@christinemartin63]

Uh-oh ... another mindbender ...

[@adrienv9075]

24:40 I seriously laughed so hard I could have woken up my neighbors.

[@wildlander7507]

Man i was high as fuck when he was talking about the goat and i was wondering if i was hallucinating all that he was saying

[@Drunksiifu]

cool beings

[@envaleorex7361]

Merleau-Ponty please

[@markericbravo3035]

If I've thought it . It exists .

[@rustyjohnson5018]

Husserl! Husserl! Husserl!

[@pavlovkuki6616]

Edmund Husserl please..

[@martynblackburn1977]

You sound like Dr Frasier Crane.

[@frusciantesplectrum7980]

I have to put the speed to 0.75 to fully digest your words.

[@deab1253]

10:53 :)

[@thatguynicky1979]

☆ If you really want to challenge normies at a party, just mention flat earth. However, if your looking for a debate with those normies, you should probably just get another beer. And if you don't have a bottle opener, getting that beer open will be a much more fulfilling challenge anyway, plus, the reward is a beer!

[@jackquinn9535]

What would the world and humanity look like now if there had been a work similar to Sein und Zeit written by Plato instead? Well, that is a nice thought-experiment in its own self-contained bubble but not that relevant a question in all fairness of actual factuality of things and elements, processes, dynamics, dialectics and structures of historical reality. And besides, we had the (early) Christian tradition codified in the notion of grace. It didn’t save us either. Lol. -Okay, let me give it a try: Had Mr. Plato come up with the core ideas of Sein und Zeit and had his imaginary work enjoeyd the similar popularity and influence his actual works did in due course of Western intellectual and cultural history we might have a nice happy hippie polygamous tribal communities living from the Earth scattered around mediterranean Europe cultivating grapes and stuff and drinking lots of wine dwelling in gentle groves hiding from the Sun half-naked married with a strong sense of being there, rooted in local (monocultural!) identities, prefering being drunk, making love in groups, playing organic flutes and singing in exctasy of Being to more rational or individual endeavours. Not that bad, if you think about it, rather Roussean - and very Heideggerian! But then again, that is just a hindsight. Paradise lost!

[@lucasheijdeman2581]

28:39 Just look at eastern philosophy

[@yash6609]

Is it a positive comment or a negative comment i.e. a taunt ?

[@lucasheijdeman2581]

@@yash6609 it's a comment

[@pateazolut7970]

Running to fast..... whats the point? None would find a time to consider or think what u say

[@aname5241]

14:20 - 14:25 But didn’t you have a wife?

[@natalia_321]

She was a goat. They got married in Vegas :D

[@aname5241]

@@natalia_321

[@benquinney2]

Doesn’t even what a human being is

[@arthurgreene4567]

So frustrating! He's a brilliant explainer, and really knows his stuff, and also importantly, has a really sympathetic and warm way of relating to his audience. But like so many explanations, just when he gets to the point, the place beyond the obvious, where we really need an example, he flakes out and says it's not important. (17:33). Many of the philosophers, Kant for example, didn't give examples of trains of thought, just presented ideas. Maybe it's because there's nothing there?

[@marlysmith7012]

Husserl couldn't have cared less about ontology? What?

[@johnnyjohnny-cg7np]

Just get on with it. Always with the 10 minute intros to these kind of videos.

[@hubi731]

O chuj tu chodzi? wytlumacz ktos brat da mi 5zl

[@VVeltanschauung187]

Heidegger skrytykował Kartezjusza. To także filozofia dotycząca języka i jego wpływu na sposób myślenia

[@josephaziz785]

Warmed over Hinduism with accreditation. Typical of all major German philosophers except Schopenauer who called Kant "The Chinaman of Konnigsburg". (Buddhism). Heidegger did not know Being (only intellectually, not existentially). If he knew Being he would meditate and have all his questions answered (happiness--the Laughing Buddha). You don't fear death when meditating. Silly--belief in absolute unfettered freedom (stepping on other people) without Ethics. We are now returning to Ethics/Reason, not Heidegger/Nietzsche/Marx--yesterday's news--we can no longer afford the murder and mayhem of absolute freedom and the absolute state or end of freedom (Marxism)--an idiotic, absurd contradiction. All artists who believe in absolute freedom are Marxists who believe in the absolute state, the corset to relieve the freedom, thus revealing the absolute hoax.

[@anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858]

_stop writing for one year_