Equilibrium 2--Calculating Equilibrium

[@berezker]

God bless you Understood 3 hours worth of class in a 17 minute video

[@Randomly.cliche]

bro thats nothing ... he just saved me from my exams, chem is my weak spot.

[@goldenkill3298]

This is my Chem teacher lol

[@secrethandlehuhu]

you smart. you loyal. i appreciate that.

[@wolvesbane1748]

Freedom that's an acreiate statement ....another one...another one ....another

[@wolvesbane1748]

one

[@syedasalwa2391]

Your the best chemistry teacher ever! And I hate chemistry but the way you explain makes it all so easier and simplerYour a genius, thanks for uploading this!!

[@saytorz]

oooooh my. Im up all night preparing for my chem finals. While in class i just didnt understand the concept. And you worked different types of questions. It was clear. You're a life saver. Thank you. ^_^

[@JJ-Chantel]

You will never know the magnitude of how much this video helped me. Thank you so much

[@justinchaney7445]

thank you so much, I have a 100 point assignment due tomorrow and have been searching the internet for so long. you saved my life.

[@kiraivanich1264]

Thank you!!! I was on the verge of tears before I watched this.

[@waodaaaaa]

literally saved my chemistry grade, god bless you !!!!

[@bokulahmmed756]

First conditions was so much helpful from me.. Best wishes for you from Bangladesh

[@josephd8404]

thank you, seriously. i finally solved a hw problem i've been stuck on for hours simply by watching 10 minutes of this video.

[@Randomly.cliche]

i love how u include sarcastic comments and make this kind of fun then how boring and sleepy others do

[@amitbanerjee1325]

Searching for how to solve these for 1 week finally got it..god bless you

[@Anna-zy6hk]

i watched so many videos and didn’t get how to do it until this one! thank u sm!

[@hielenaug]

YOU! are the best!! thanks a lot! why can't I ever get a great teacher like you? I understood everything so clear!

[@laurasalvaggio113]

Thank you so much this is the only video I've watched on this subject that actually explained it thoroughly.

[@DM77333]

Honestly, this is such a fun explanation for what I thought would be a super boring topic so thank you!

[@GinoTheSinner]

Thank you for clarifying the molarity bit. Of the ~100 videos I've watched this is the first one that specifically mentions that only M's should be in the ICE table.

[@luvzlife1]

If someone told me i would understand ICE BOX i would tell them they are crazy! Thanks you Mr.Seigel!

[@sentoiben]

Bro! Best 17:40 of my KZbin binge ever!

[@kgaogeloakaaka7393]

Wow... You actually explained this better in 17 minutes and that's what my teacher couldn't do in 2 weeks.. 😂

[@preidbass]

best explanation of this I've found...cheers bro!

[@jaidmubanga5328]

Thank you for this wonderful explanation 🎉❤

[@adityasaxena7374]

Very well explained keep uploading more videos

[@emmanuelkalunga7916]

Well explained and you are just a good teacher

[@ethanlawrence5502]

Thankyou for this video. It really helped me. You might just have saved me.

[@Wolfeywolf16]

Thank you so much! I was really dreading the quadratics equation and you just elminated so much of my anxiety

[@jagritbudhiraja6391]

thank you i wish i had a teacher like you

[@meganysc5246]

thank you so much!!! I finally understand what my teacher was trying to teach for a week:")

[@shamri4436]

thanks for the help! got at 67 on my test!! my parents love me again!!!!!!!

[@24OakRaiders]

Amazing!!!! More power to you. I love your teaching mechanism. Thank you.

[@kevingunawan3913]

isnt the 6:55 2H2O suppose to be 0.1 m at initial, why is it at 1.0?

[@jaidmubanga5328]

He might hv made a mistake

[@kayla7772]

Thank you so much for making this video, Mr. Seigel!

[@michellengu3946]

good explanation man! better than my current teacher >

[@riak401]

Thank you soooooo much!!! You helped me wayyy more than my teacher :))))

[@WAZZA1235]

Thanks for saving my exam.

[@YoungFudge3]

youn the mannn i understood everything in this 17 minute video

[@abby4899]

Thanks a gazzilion yo! :) I adore peeps that teach using examples!

[@donodestro4179]

i love you...you made me understand the ICE table...thanks

[@wallacet4789]

Appreciate that, very clear explanation and it helped me very much ! Hope i can answer the question for exam tomorrow!

[@francieemanzano2034]

Very useful information and he's very good at explaining it. Thank you.

[@ankithrao7215]

Great explanation, but just one question: is Kc the same as Keq?

[@WAZZA1235]

I got something quite odd when redoing the question at 14:30 myself, with another technic. What I did was when we were at the 64 = [HI]2 / [H2] * [I2]. I simply placed the 2 réactants (the 0.2 * 0.2) on the side of 64. So I have 64 * 0.2 * 0.2 = [HI]2. So i square root the result of 64 * 0.2 * 0.2 and get the answer 1.6. How come the equilibrium for 2HI, when calculated (as I just did), is equal to 1.6 rather than the 0 that is expected?

[@Stelnice]

isn't Kp=Kc(RT)^change in n (where R is 0.0821 L.atm, T is temp in kelvin, and change in n is mol of gas products-mol gas reactants) ?

[@blankblank8176]

YES

[@lenzfaraday2077]

Thank you so much!! I missed the class on ICE so had to keep up

[@San-pu1gn]

jst awsummm👍👍

[@aprilharris8933]

Thank you so much your students are so lucky.

[@Rodger16]

Very good video to learn

[@harikeshkaul5584]

Very good explanation. Thank you.

[@nerdyblackgirl_x]

do you have a video that goes deeper into the ratio thing?

[@CoolVideoWatchpersn]

bloody fantastic thank you so much for doing this video! fantastic explaination

[@majan374]

Why would you use square brackets on the Kp expression when they mean moldm^-3?

[@lindeeslife6513]

At 10.01 , is the unit for Kc M^-1 or M? Since you didn't include the unit when you calculated the final answer which was 0.16 >< thanks!

[@justinchaney7445]

+Shalinda Beevi M

[@pastorpretty4121]

Does reactants always go down if for reverse reaction????

[@Dev3z]

Thanks bro love from India

[@favourizuagba231]

Thank you sir. This video was helpful

[@jumuahalabsbek731]

Well executed

[@gangsterkami1]

Fantastic method. However I prefer to think of out logically and use ratios to work this out. I kind of wish I knew this method in the first place, I suppose thinking of it logically is the superior way as it shows your understanding of equilibria.

[@muskaanseher4144]

Thank you so much, you are a great teacher☺☺

[@aidanbailey6337]

Brilliant (taking Gen Chem 2: college).

[@westsideconnection1258]

Thanks you’re a great teacher!

[@calseed]

where did u get 0.38 from tho ?

[@TheIsotopes]

For the last problem why was it (2x)^2 ???

[@surat8591]

Awesome!!Thank you so much!!!

[@carefull8365]

Is this for as level?

[@Jessiey404]

What about a limiting reagent?? How does that work it's way into the equilibrium???

[@marcseigel5949]

LRs don't get involved in Equilibrium because the reaction never goes to completion.

[@saladmona]

so for question #2, 0.16 is the answer and it ends there?

[@saimakhankhan2517]

How can u calculate Kp when you are given moles. plz someone tell me a link or something.

[@BunnyEthan]

how do you get the 8x in the 1.6-8x=2x?

[@rhussain3180]

Thank you! You will help me get through chem eng! :D

[@mongalo92]

You're a life saver!!!!!!

[@Kayla-ns7lm]

Thankyou, I found this really helpful :) really appreciate it

[@jamiecoleman773]

Do you do it the same same if your two starting moles of H2 O2 were different? say instead of them both being .200M, H2 = .033 and O2= .0081 what would you do?

[@justinchaney7445]

+Jamie Coleman The reactants (which I assume you meant H2 and I2, not that it matters) would have to change by the same amount so they still would change by "-x". 2HI would still increase by "2x". Therefore you would plug in these new values instead of .2. From there you would simplify the "64=" equation until you reached 60x2−2.6304x+0.017107=0. After that plug in the quadratic formula(If you don't know what that is go to this site here www.purplemath.com/modules/quadform.htm ). That should give you your answer for x. You will get two answers (.0359 and .0079) and it must be .0079 because .035 is greater than your H2 value. then just apply this to your ICE table giving you an HI value of .158. That is as far as my understanding is of this topic.

[@mickaylamihailovic4613]

Lifesaver!! Thank you soooo much :)

[@143BabyDoll143]

Wouldn't HI be 2(times) 0.32 making it 0.64

[@justinchaney7445]

+143BabyDoll143 Probably a little late to tell you, but know because when he multiplied .16 by 2 that was due to HI having a constant of 2.

[@beautyprincess6454]

Thank you very veryyyyy muchhhhhhh you help me alot

[@adityasaxena7374]

Please Add Questions Of Degree Of Dissociation.

[@iEpicness2k10]

This helped me so much! Thanks!!!!!

[@Jenny-mi3zq]

Made me laugh a lot 😂 thanks 👍

[@thashen1690]

great video, thanks

[@crystal_fairy-n1u]

sir i've a problem in this chapter and i want to send u a question so i'll be pleased if u help me..

[@carlosadams5478]

i do wanna say this but you are awesome

[@m3h3d1997]

thank you so much i highly appreciate that

[@sidarthavader9062]

Thanks, it helped a lot! :)

[@AbsurdoMX]

Eres mi dios.

[@TuyisengeJonas-id9sw]

I can't find where the -o.38 was got from

[@daretoawesome]

Since they tell you what the equilibrium concentration is you can subtract to find the change.

[@peterkabwe9648]

This is awesome

[@spyroskaperonis8803]

in 12:15 Kp equals P(SO3)2 over P(SO2)2 x P(O2) NO CONCENTRATION ( [....] )

[@berezker]

Concentration is the gas pressure in gasses. Conc. of gasses is increased by decresing the volume and/or increasing Pressure. Thus, Conc. of gasses is pressure "P"

[@romies2999]

Your the best thanks

[@hafsaabid7454]

Thank you so much!!

[@yuganeswarman8416]

Thank you internet

[@josephatmanyeti8012]

awesome

[@mohammadhussainshah1475]

Thank you so much

[@trailblazer_98]

Thank you sooooo much!!!!!!

[@TheJinxism]

Brilliant

[@abigailjackson9288]

thank u so much!!!

[@toivomvula]

Thank you.

[@jrod8807]

Subscribed

[@shudidesai]

You da real OG

[@olwakhemngqolo3750]

thank you

[@alisaclark4560]

Thank you!!!