Equity & Trusts - Three Certainties: Objects

[@mederickamedo1289]

Marcus, you are very Clever. I enjoyed this lecture and it gave me a grip of Certainty on Trust Law.

[@marcuscleaver]

That's so kind. I appreciate the feedback.

[@rsh0032]

Good job again. Thank you very much.

[@MsRated1]

That was brilliant and made so much sense compared to my lecturers notes!

[@christyrambajan9757]

Thank you for all your vids! very helpful

[@hdhdhd7811]

Thank you so much, You saved my life

[@aroobmanzoor9255]

You are amazing!

[@umutyilmaz5]

you are amazing.

[@rf9624]

you are absolutely amazing! thank you

[@stuartcartwright]

Thanks

[@malvikamahindra8562]

you are amazing - thank you soooo much

[@LegalIssue97]

Please making these.... These are amazing

[@MarkPummell133]

as always great stuff Marcus; do you by any chance have a copy of Spafax... i can't locate it anywhere; am a little bit puzzled by your analysis of re: Leek [1969] as Sachs J seems to suggest a 'striking out' (as in contract law) is NOT available with respect to trusts, where he says: Per Sachs J. Apart from authority, the ut res magis valeat rule should have been applied to save the trusts. It is regrettable that the court has not the same power as it has in the case of a contract, to strike out the words creating invalidity (post, pp. 583A-B, 585A).

[@marcuscleaver]

I imagine there is a copy of Spafax doing the rounds on Westlaw/Lexis. The phrase 'striking out' is not really used in the strict sense of contract law but rather that an offending power can effectively be removed (but at the same time being aware of knock-on effects). Most likely my tendency to use baseball analogies got the better of me ;)

[@jmurphy4889]

Top job mate !

[@elsels5849]

Can you please make a video on different types of trusts you can make? I really would love that as my exam is on tuesday (26th June) and I love the way you describe things.

[@syahanaazhari4682]

thank you so much!

[@hristiannenov7043]

Forgive me if I am wrong, but is it not 1970 when the case of McPhail vs Doulton was decided and not 1975(what it says in your powerpoint presentation) later remanded by the HoL to CA as Re Baden's Trusts No 2 ? You only have it wrong on the Discretionary trust slide at 6th minute, then forward it is the right year -1970.

[@marcuscleaver]

+Hristian Nenov Good point. Must be a typo or I got it mixed up with another case. Kayford etc.

[@omeyiogboji7468]

please do some videos on tracing in trust and quitclose trust and registered land for land law , your videos are amazing...exams in two days

[@carlnorris9689]

What do you think this would be ? 800 thousand pounds to my trustees to distribute as they see fit amongst kitchen staff with any u distributed funds going to charity . I'm not too sure

[@carlnorris9689]

A bottle of wine from my cellar to ex employees who claim it within 6 months. - is this a mere power ? If not why