Crystal clear! if the statistical properties can be deduced from a single sufficiently (namely going to inf) long random sample, then the process is ergodic! This is my 3rd video and I finally heard a satisfying definition. Thank you, sir!
@DrJulianNewmansChannel10 күн бұрын
Regarding your heuristic description prior to your formal definition: if all you need is that the statistics of a sufficiently long time-segment of your one sample path approximate the statistics of the subsequent future behaviour of that same sample path, then I think you don't need ergodicity - just having stationarity is sufficient. Ergodicity will then give that these statistics are the same across the different sample paths (as in your formal definition) 🙂
@bkquanvu32283 жыл бұрын
The best explanation ever, thank you from Việt Nam 😍😍😍
@kumgaurav00002 жыл бұрын
you have a clear concept
@conceptsinengineering2 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@sakthishkumaarmurugan97372 жыл бұрын
Clean Explaination
@nitishdhawan36514 жыл бұрын
Bhai so much underrated channel
@AbdullahAhmad-xc3xl3 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation, thank you!
@sramkumar32252 жыл бұрын
Very clearly and patiently explained! Thanks a ton!
@autaulti68835 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation! Thank you very much
@ericforrest88975 жыл бұрын
I'm taking a communications course and my teacher couldn't even explain it this well. Hope I do well on my exam.
@conceptsinengineering5 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot! Good luck for your exam..
@poojakashyap66083 жыл бұрын
One of the best explanations so far. Thank you !!
@ionutvrabie49203 жыл бұрын
Thank you a lot! I was reading Nassim Taleb and ergodicity confused me :)
@conceptsinengineering3 жыл бұрын
Glad I could help!
@trapped_monkey4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the explanation. Very clear.
@reemareema4392 жыл бұрын
Bro Please can u help me by writing here ,What is the exact definition of band width, standard deviation... Because i didn' understand from the next video.. Thanks alot
@ssundi3 жыл бұрын
One of the very nice explanation of erogodic process I have seen. Keep it up man.. God bless you
@teamdinesh27684 жыл бұрын
Super clear! ! Thanks a lot
@conceptsinengineering4 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@AnalyseThiswithIO3 жыл бұрын
This fits well with Nassim Taleb's explanation. I was thinking about tyre punctures in the projected scenario.
@AnalyseThiswithIO3 жыл бұрын
A tyre puncture or axle break are catastrophe for the scenario you explained, which Taleb might call a Black Swan.
@debasiskar46622 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation. I was expecting a numerical example based on the very example of driving a car. That would have made things extremely lucid. Thanks.
@conceptsinengineering2 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Will look in to that
@tag_of_frank4 жыл бұрын
How does this definition relate to the definition that it is a recurrent aperiodic Markov chain?
@hezi21404 жыл бұрын
very clear! Thank you so much!
@conceptsinengineering4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@sjjb90005 жыл бұрын
very good.thanks
@elahehghanati40113 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot. It was so clear and convincing
@conceptsinengineering2 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@sreyagopakumar76644 жыл бұрын
Very clear explanation! Thank you so much!!
@mohitbhatt65714 жыл бұрын
Bro give a video on random vibration of crankshaft
@mailaralingams78965 жыл бұрын
thank you so much sir
@mdabdullah88195 жыл бұрын
Good pronounciation.😀
@conceptsinengineering5 жыл бұрын
Ha ha .I know my pronunciation is bad! Will try to improve..