This is the original review of Escape from New York by Siskel & Ebert on "Sneak Previews" in 1981. All of the segments pertaining to the movie have been included.
Пікірлер: 289
@steveconn4 жыл бұрын
"You've got to rescue the president." "President of what? "That's not funny, Plisken." Great dialogue!
@bobrew4614 жыл бұрын
"So what's your answer Plissken?" "Get a new President!" I think Nick Castle wrote those funny lines... :-0
@Craig-dv3ji2 жыл бұрын
Couldn't agree more. And that bit of dialogue you quoted is perfect.
@MrCarpen7er4 ай бұрын
The name is *Plissken
@Lonequacker3 жыл бұрын
Nothing is funnier than hearing "Escape From New York is set in the future in the year 1997"
@CR414895 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite John Carpenter films. Love Kurt Russell as Snake Plissken and another great Carpenter score.
@BradiKal614 жыл бұрын
a RARE example of Gene knowing better than Roger. The ending was awesome, Plisken getting revenge on the system that used him. He doesn't care if the world burns, he has no F's left to give.
@henryesj62423 жыл бұрын
I'd disagree, I think Gene was way smarter than people took him for. Just as much as Ebert, to me.
@Rasputin4435562 жыл бұрын
If you want an even better example of Gene knowing better than Roger, watch their bit about Full Metal Jacket.
@w41duvernay2 жыл бұрын
The problem of these 2 is they want every movie to be an academy award winning movie, not entertaining a viewer for a few hours.
@kevinbirge21302 жыл бұрын
Gene loved genre movies, but couldn’t admit his blue-collar tastes. Watching him intellectualize liking something that you know he liked just because it was cool is one of the great pleasures this show affords.
@mariopalos92382 жыл бұрын
@@henryesj6242 I don't think Gene's intelligence has ever been questioned. It's just that he tended to look down on movies that a lot of people considered entertaining.
@thunderstruck54844 жыл бұрын
Earnest Borgnine was such a great actor in every role
@LouieLouie33 жыл бұрын
Best in The Poseiden Adventure.
@kennealy21483 жыл бұрын
I liked him in Convoy, he played Dirty Lyle "Cottonmouth" Wallace who chases Kris Kristofferson's character, Martin "Rubber Duck" Penwald and his convoy of truckers all over the Arizona and into the Mexican border as Rubber Duck is met by the Army and Lyle who will shoot at Rubber Duck's truck as he drives onto the bridge...
@maskedmarvyl47746 ай бұрын
@@LouieLouie3, He was one of my favorite characters in the film, because he played it completely straight. He seemed to be an insane cab driver who didn't quite understand that Manhattan had been turned into a giant prison.
@rauserbegins58502 жыл бұрын
I first saw ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK on First Choice Superchannel (Canada) in 1982. I was 11. I adored the movie, and my younger brother and I watched it several times. Later, we got it on VHS videocassette. Watched it several more times. To this day, it's one of my favourite movies.
@citygirl57055 жыл бұрын
Ebert didn't like the ending? The ending was great!!!
@peterkrug41244 жыл бұрын
(SPOILER) The ending seemed to imply that Snake had just doomed the world to nuclear war.
@travismcdonald65764 жыл бұрын
Peter Krug Lol. Yup. Then he shut down the world in Escape From LA.
@BradiKal613 жыл бұрын
@@peterkrug4124 Instead we were doomed to Escape from LA
@youtubesuresuckscock3 жыл бұрын
Ebert blew. Sorry, but his opinion sucked.
@kevinmcdonald64773 жыл бұрын
"YOU'RETHE DUKE (rat a tat tat) YOU'RE THE DUKE.....A # ONE." Now THAT was presidential!!!!!! Screw Air Force One! Snake and Doctor Loomis rule!!!
@christinacascadilla44733 жыл бұрын
This movie did not need Meryl Streep. Adrienne Barbeau was perfect for the role.
@jedijones Жыл бұрын
She certainly put her best feet forward.
@shanecochran24914 ай бұрын
I always thought she was just an adequate actress. But always good for the most part. Not very good in Swamp Thing.
@MrCarpen7er4 ай бұрын
Yeah, she always had two big talents
@user-uq6sz6po3d3 ай бұрын
Her reputation precedes her...
@travismcdonald65765 жыл бұрын
15 years later Ebert would praise Escape From L.A. Go figure.
@BradiKal614 жыл бұрын
OMG escape from LA was HORRIBLE.
@pungisotu4 жыл бұрын
He did the same with Die Hard and Die Hard 2.
@kentallard88524 жыл бұрын
It is a better film, more focused, better characterisation, and great political and social satire
@TheWuCepticon19814 жыл бұрын
@@kentallard8852 LOL stfu, it's horrible. I'm the biggest John Carpenter and Kurt Russell fan there is and even I realize that Escape From LA is garbage. It's not even campy fun, or a guilty pleasure, it's just bad.
@gallery75964 жыл бұрын
@@kentallard8852 With regard to the sequel: I think they made a mistake going with virtually the same plot. Still, there's a couple great action sequences, some genuinely funny moments, and to your point about characterization, yes, Russell is just excellent as Snake. If for no other reason, "Escape From LA" needed to be made so we could see him play that role one more time.
@ronaldh84465 жыл бұрын
I always agreed more with Ebert than Siskel. There were exceptions for sure and this is definitely one of them (Siskel also liked Carpenter's "The Thing" and Ebert didn't). Didn't like the ending??? The audience cheered wildly at the ending when I saw it a few times in the summer of '81. The villain's demise and the American Bandstand tape were crowd-pleasing moments and the audience ate it up.
@BrokenGodEnt5 жыл бұрын
Ebert also somewhat famously gave Escape From L.A a 3.5 star rating out of 4. I also tended to agree with Ebert, but it's crazy to me that he said no to this much better original (imo), yet gave the sequel an almost perfect score. Don't get me wrong, I also enjoy LA a lot, but I don't think it comes close to the original.
@ronaldh84465 жыл бұрын
@@BrokenGodEnt Yep. He does have a valid point about L.A. being more satirical toward its culture than N.Y. was. But it's more of a silly comedy than a cynical action pic and much less rewatchable. I can watch L.A. and chuckle but N.Y. is much more entertaining.
@chriscornelius25184 жыл бұрын
I think John Carpenter's The Thing is the best horror film I have ever seen.
@TheWuCepticon19814 жыл бұрын
I was surprised that Gene Siskel actually liked The Thing, he had to be one of the few critics who did back then LOL
@patricktilton53773 жыл бұрын
The ending was perfect! Snake put the President to the test . . . saw how full of shit he was, how he didn't really give a shit about the world he'd been saved from or the world he was presumably trying to save with that Tape . . . so Snake--not caring himself about the shitty world people like the President had created and ruled over--allowed that world to continue its collapse, by destroying the Tape that supposedly was going to rescue everything from the brink of destruction. Just as he was deemed expendable, those tiny explosives lodged into his neck, so too was the world expendable to him. Snake was NOT a hero; just a ruthless man with the capability of getting the job done.
@defchan19703 жыл бұрын
“Cute” is not a word that springs to mind when I think about this movie’s ending. And Adrienne Barbeau walking around half naked was a definite plus.
@kickedinthecalfbyacow75493 жыл бұрын
He described the ending as cute.
@defchan19703 жыл бұрын
@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549 He sure did. And I just don’t see that ending as “cute,” was my point.
@katobrucelee0811 ай бұрын
I want that on the back of a releae "The ending was cute" - Gene Siskel @@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549
@kickedinthecalfbyacow754911 ай бұрын
@@defchan1970 why are you still talking about this?
@defchan197010 ай бұрын
@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549I haven’t talked about this in two years. Why the hell are YOU still talking about this?
@kentallard88524 жыл бұрын
"You may remember him from several Disney films..." - one of the reasons why Russell did this film was to cast off that child actor image.
@kildare974 жыл бұрын
Funny. As someone born in 97 it's everything from Escape From New York onwards that I'd know him from. Never seen any of his Disney pictures.
@TooCooFoYou4 жыл бұрын
kildare97 Kurt Russell was basically Disney’s protege. Even in his death, he left a note that had Kurt Russell written on it.
@sha112353 жыл бұрын
@@kildare97 He was a child actor in Disney films.
@sha112353 жыл бұрын
@@TooCooFoYou He's not fuckin' dead yet.
@kamuelalee3 жыл бұрын
This was the movie that changed him the Disney actor into a Hollywood actor.
@kamuelalee3 жыл бұрын
Probably one of the best movies of the 1980s. Not sure why Ebert trashed it. And the ending was one of the best of any movie I've ever seen.
@bullock42114 жыл бұрын
One of Carpenters finest masterpieces
@TheWuCepticon19814 жыл бұрын
Yes it is, I love Halloween. But I like Escape From New York a little bit more. And of course, The Thing is my favorite lol
@luke99474 жыл бұрын
The Wu-Cepticon my favourites are THE THING and THEY LIVE
@skupena4 жыл бұрын
@@luke9947 YES! They Live is another one of Carpenter's best!
@michaelorick21973 жыл бұрын
Yes this one and The Fog is His two best films s
@michaelorick21973 жыл бұрын
I don't like they live it is aweful y
@MediaBuster4 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite movies... just so overall cool, badass and different.
@BackwoodsFilms4 жыл бұрын
Adrienne Barbeau walking around half naked? Count me in!
@TheWuCepticon19814 жыл бұрын
Yes, she was super sexy back then. John Carpenter made sure he showed his wife off LOL
@weswolever74774 жыл бұрын
Didn’t matter which half either
@stevenh81744 жыл бұрын
2 good reasons to see this film
@mantroid3 жыл бұрын
Showing some cleavage is half-naked? Come-on, Siskel, don't be such a dork.
@philipthomas68083 жыл бұрын
@@TheWuCepticon1981 Probably more like John wanted to ensure his wife gave him some leg at the end of the shoot...:)
@1986SSMONTECARLO5 жыл бұрын
Saw this Cult Classic at The Loews Paradise Theater, Bronx back when it first premiered in '81...GOOD TIMES!!!...GREAT MOVIE THEATER!!!
@TheWuCepticon19814 жыл бұрын
Lol you're lucky, I wish I could've seen this and The Thing in theaters.
@philmellor48854 жыл бұрын
Saw this at the Tatton cinema in south Manchester UK. Was a double bill with a flick called Visiting hours. Happy days.
@Bacalao29294 жыл бұрын
2016BMWi8 , I saw it in Alerton theater, not a great theater, a dump, one of coaches from PelhamParkway little league was the manager of the theater,
@bobrew4614 жыл бұрын
@@philmellor4885 Double Bills in the UK!! Those were the days.
@philmellor48854 жыл бұрын
@@bobrew461 Yeah...loved a double bill. The randomness of the pairings. Gregory's Girl and Capricorn one for example sake.
@tinderbox2183 жыл бұрын
It's hard to explain how vivid and nightmarish (in a good way) this movie was at the time it came out. It showed a darkly realistic cyberpunk aesthetic even before "Blade Runner" or the literary genre itself had coalesced. It was meant to be comic book, and I'm sorry Ebert didn't recognize what an effective and to-be-classic anti-hero character was created by Russell here. It was the ultimate expression of the "prison film", a genre with built-in horror generated by the anxiety that law-abiding movie goers have at the prospect of being thrown into a dog-eat-dog prison world. I agree with Ebert that the ending's extreme nihilism, though an appropriate coda to what came before it, also left it on a real downer.
@robdavis47773 жыл бұрын
I have seen this movie well over 150 times in my life. It’s a classic.
@erichaynes75022 жыл бұрын
This movie was great. Carpenter should have made it a trilogy with the sequels being released in the mid and late 80's. By the time he made Escape from L.A. the magic was long gone. Also, Adrienne Barbeau was perfect as a tough and beautiful woman!
@jakesli91543 жыл бұрын
lee van cleefs cheekbones are so iconic they should get their own billing in the credits.
@williamhicks77364 жыл бұрын
Oh man! The atmosphere of the NYC prison colony makes this film so cool, I can’t believe Ebert gave it a thumb’s down... And what’s up with Siskel dissing Adrienne Barbeau? Great flick!
@TheWuCepticon19814 жыл бұрын
Exactly, John Carpenter's direction, music and Dean Cundey's cinematography creates such a thick and dread filled atmosphere. Also, Snake Plissken pretty much gave birth to the quintessential, stereotypical, 80s action hero, the movie is amazing. And Adrienne Barbeau was so smoking hot, she should've gotten props for that alone lol
@jedijones3 жыл бұрын
Siskel was usually harder on actors who tried to cross from TV to movies.
@georgeharris98732 жыл бұрын
Siskel's an asshole. What does he know about how women dress ?
@michaelperkowski6415 жыл бұрын
Loved John carpenter's escape from New York one of my favorite movies of summer 81.
@razorbackfilms4 жыл бұрын
Michael Perkowski I didn’t see it until it came on cable but I must have watched it every time it came on.
@gallery75964 жыл бұрын
Yes, 1981 was a very good year for movies.
@phantomcollector19764 жыл бұрын
ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK IS AN ABSOLUTE MASTERPIECE
@TheWuCepticon19814 жыл бұрын
Yes it is. The premise, the characters, the cinematography, atmosphere, music etc. Easily one of Carpenter's top films.
@johnnyskinwalker40954 жыл бұрын
calm down there lol
@mikegarrens52863 жыл бұрын
Thank you brother! You understand!!!!!!!
@williamhicks77363 жыл бұрын
It’s a fun movie but not a masterpiece... not even close...
@phantomcollector19763 жыл бұрын
@@williamhicks7736 THATS YOU'RE OPINION DIPSHIT
@kevinbirge21302 жыл бұрын
I remember watching this back then. I was in 7th grade when I discovered this show. I still find them great viewing.
@stevestarscream51825 жыл бұрын
Usually agreed with ebert more often but he was way off on this one and the ending was freaking classic
@travismcdonald65765 жыл бұрын
Bill Megatron The irony is that Ebert was one of the few critics to like Escape From L.A.
@kamuelalee3 жыл бұрын
One of the best endings ever in a movie.
@geniusmode12194 жыл бұрын
"Set in the future, in 1997" 😂😂
@jasonmeadows85104 жыл бұрын
I disagree with Siskel and Ebert regarding their shared criticism of the film, that it didn't go more in depth "about the prison society in Manhattan". Well, it's a movie, not a documentary. There's only so much time the director has to tell the story. Carpenter did it right; he focused on Plissken's perspective of things.
@gallery75964 жыл бұрын
Yes, I think delving more deeply into the prison society might only have served to slow the pace of what is essentially an action film, not (as you so correctly observed) a documentary. Now in the sequel they did step away from the plot to take a closer look at the culture of the LA prison society and I think that only served to bring the movie to a virtual halt. Carpenter's instincts were definitely more on the money with the original.
@kamuelalee3 жыл бұрын
Totally agree. The setup is that NYC is a prison...that's only the setup and setting of the picture. The real action is all about Snake rescuing the president.
@ricardocantoral76723 жыл бұрын
I actually agree with Roger on that point. The Manhattan Prison should have been a fully realized world.
@johnherne84893 жыл бұрын
Absolutely. It's kind of funny watching these old movie reviews from Siskel and Ebert. They also didn't like Blade Runner.
@alexpilgrim82483 жыл бұрын
It's funny that Ebert didn't like the ending, but loved the ending of L.A.
@Mondomeyer4 жыл бұрын
Strange that when reviewing 'Prince of Darkness', Siskel said that Carpenter hadn't done anything interesting since 'Halloween', yet he liked this one. What do you expect from critics, consistency?
@sha11235 Жыл бұрын
He forgot I guess.
@das814 жыл бұрын
Gene Siskel loved it? WTF!?
@TheWuCepticon19814 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's weird how he liked that and The Thing LOL I usually agree with Ebert, but not with these two movies.
@kamuelalee3 жыл бұрын
But he hates everything? LOL
@VirtualLunacy3 жыл бұрын
Escape from New York is a classic!!
@briannewman532 Жыл бұрын
Siskel went a little hard on Adrienne Barbeau calling her a terrible actress, two of the best things in this movie belong to her.
@TimeAxisMedia7 ай бұрын
Michael, I've been looking for their review of EFNY for years. Thanks!
@OuterGalaxyLounge5 жыл бұрын
Interesting to come to this right after watching your clip of their review of The Warriors, as both flicks are about a mission deep into crumbling New York that involves avoiding dangerous gangs. Escape from New York is a satisfying if mildly imperfect realization of its premise. I'd actually have liked it more if it had explored the mysterious city even more and been longer, and maybe had a slightly larger budget to open up that vast world. Still, there's nothing to criticize about the story, characters or rough-and-ready confidence of Carpenter's direction.
@scraps9925 жыл бұрын
I just saw it. You seem to know what you're on about, so I'll bring this up to you. I didn't like it. I didn't outright hate it because its premise was slightly intriguing and it did remind me of The Warriors, if only a bit too much. What was on display seemed very shallow to me, I didn't understand the motivations of the main antagonist who was so gung-ho about keeping the ill-obtained president that he was willing to risk life and limb. For what? Ransom? Money? Freedom? Or to dress him up in a wig? The whole deathclock subplot was nonsensical in that it actually hindered the mission. What if he got a beat on the president 10 minutes later than when he had gotten him? It's an excuse for pointless predictable drama that didn't need to be there. And why did the president fly over that airspace to begin with? Carpenter is usually a great filmmaker, but his touch here seemed to outright lack confidence. Both the sound and visual editing were off and it made for an awkward movie. I just don't understand why people like it. 4/10.
@catrachocolo4 жыл бұрын
1. The main antagonist's motivation is clearly stated in the movie. 2. The deathclock prevents Plissken from escaping. Yes, it lowers his chances of actually accomplishing his mission, but without it there would be no chance at all, because the he would simply abandon the mission and disappear. Again, this is explained in the movie. 3. The president's plane was hijacked and intentionally crashed in Manhattan. And again, this is shown in the film. Did you not pay any attention whatsoever while watching the movie? Or are you one of those moviegoers who need everything spelled out for them (I didn't understand...., Why did....) and still don't get it? Disike the film all you want, but at least come up with valid criticism. And please learn the difference between personally liking/not liking a movie and a movie actually being good/bad from a filmmaking point of view.
@scraps9924 жыл бұрын
@@catrachocolo Wow, okay. Needless aggression there, but whatever. It's now been going on three months since watching it, so maybe my responses aren't valid, but I'll give it a try anyway. What is the villain's motivation? Seems to me, all they did with the president is torture and humiliate him. And they're worried about him skipping out and escaping from a mission that's set in a city-sized super prison? Seems to me they could just track him and promise to neutralize him if he tries anything rather than putting the life of the president in the hands of a traitor and psychopath hooked up to a death device. I don't care what you say about that. It's a plot hole. Plain and simple. With the third one, fine. I'll concede to that one. Maybe I just missed that part. And you know what? Maybe I didn't pay much attention to the movie at certain points. Can you figure out why? Because I wasn't enjoying it and I was getting exceptionally bored with Russel's constant whispering and the shallow-as-hell development of the world in which this is set. The entire setting feels more like a prop - something to allow for Carpenter's imaginings to be half-heartedly realized without putting much work into the overall immersion of the film. It's shallow, slow and stupid. These are valid criticisms, and just because you don't like hearing it, it doesn't mean that they aren't valid. You have every right to like this movie, but every movie has flaws. It just depends on whether or not those flaws hold the film back in your opinion. And I can very much enjoy a movie that doesn't have everything spelled out the viewer. Know what my fifth favorite movie is? 2001: A Space Odyssey. That explains less than EFNY, but it feels like I'm actually watching something transpire. Escape from New York feels dead on arrival and totally soulless. It's cinematic junk food and not even satisfying junk food at that. There. Notice how I wasn't aggressive? Now it's your turn.
@necromancer68973 жыл бұрын
And he was channeling Eastwood
@kamuelalee3 жыл бұрын
There seemed to be some nods toward early Eastwood movies...including having actor Lee Van Cleef in the film, Cleef being in two Eastwood Spagetti Westerns.
@TimeAxisMedia7 ай бұрын
I remember wondering if Gene's comment about Adrienne Barbeau hurt her feelings. That wasn't nice, Gene!
@lowbridge7070 Жыл бұрын
In 1981 the crime problem in new york city was so bad and getting worse, that at the time it wasnt much of an unrealistic concept for the island of manhattan to be turned into one giant prison. Crime was so out of hand, it seemed like a logical and easier solution.
@75aces974 жыл бұрын
6:19 Funny Ebert says this about endings. If you watch 1980's movies, any genre, it seems like a LOT of them didn't reach a conclusion, so much as they hit a payoff scene, then just sort of stumbled to the credits. That's not the worst thing, since a 2010's version of the same story would probably have 20-minute denouement, but it's a weird idiosyncrasy of 80's films.
@Locadel20032 жыл бұрын
This movie & The thing basically made Kurt russel a legend and what he is now. Because before those, he did an excellent performance in Elvis (1979) where he played Elvis but that was a forgotten tv movie and wasnt a big movie. So thanks also for Escape from new york
@jedijones5 жыл бұрын
"You're Snake Plissken?" Does he not look exactly like a "Snake Plissken?"
@sir_john_hammond5 жыл бұрын
Everyone thought he'd be taller, apparently.
@jedijones Жыл бұрын
@@sir_john_hammond He's pretty short for an ex-con.
@kitchenerleslie27554 жыл бұрын
The reason why we didn't see the rest of the prison society was because of the low budget
@ricardocantoral76723 жыл бұрын
True, but Roger had a point about the underdeveloped characters.
@OroborusFMA3 жыл бұрын
The ending was consistent with the nihilism throughout. These guys are nuts.
@TotalMeltdown24 жыл бұрын
Escape New York is more serious. Escape LA is more of a satire/parody. I like them both
@jmjfanss4 жыл бұрын
I hated escape from l.a.
@TotalMeltdown24 жыл бұрын
@@jmjfanss Would you care to explain why you hate it? Just curious
@ricardocantoral76723 жыл бұрын
I didn't like Escape from LA upon my initial viewing but I am tempted to give it a second watch.
@johnnyskinwalker40954 жыл бұрын
How great was Lee Van Cliff
@ricardocantoral76723 жыл бұрын
He became famous roughly around the time he seriously considered giving up acting.
@johnnyskinwalker40953 жыл бұрын
@@ricardocantoral7672 I see this a lot where actors reach a certain age, their legend statue explodes. I think it's usualy a mark of respect.
@ricardocantoral76723 жыл бұрын
@@johnnyskinwalker4095 I could understand his frustration. Before the spaghetti westerns, Van Cleef was a minor league actor whose best known roles were in films that were merely seen as B grade crime dramas such as The Big Combo and Kansas City Confidential. These days, both films are now considered classics.
@michaelorick21973 жыл бұрын
The ending is great
@PleaseLikeMyComments3 жыл бұрын
This one shocks me. I thought Gene would hate it and Roger would love it.
@robertf20174 жыл бұрын
The ironic thing is Roger Ebert created the “Stanton Rule” that stated any film with Harry Dean Stanton couldn’t be bad. (He made this years after “Escape From New York”) he also changed his view of the film years later.
@michaelorick21973 жыл бұрын
I love Escape from New york
@phantasm81805 жыл бұрын
for me is a big YES
@eargasm10724 жыл бұрын
Oh Adrianne SHWIIING!!
@kamuelalee3 жыл бұрын
I know. And a bad actress? Don't think so. Siskel was a bit dumb at times.
@THX-kw2jh2 жыл бұрын
Adrienne Barbeau may have been a "poor actress", but she was a Very Beautiful Desirable Woman, in my opinion perfect for this role & movie.
@shenloken24 жыл бұрын
Everytime I see Kurt Russell and Lee Van Kleef talk to one another it seems like a conversation between Solid Snake and Revolver Ocelot. Hideo Kojima after all lists Escape from New York as one of his many influences.
@RenR704 жыл бұрын
You can’t always judge a movie like it’s a academy award winning drama, sometimes you just have to take it for what it is and enjoy it.
@maxxxmodelz40614 жыл бұрын
I think that's what Gene was saying here. Funny though, because if you look back on the majority of the films reviewed by S&E, Ebert is usually the one favoring films like this one and pointing out the artistic merits of some of the more violent films while Gene was always the one who couldn't understand why graphic violence was shown at all.
@tekharthazenyatta23102 жыл бұрын
Why didn't John Carpenter explore the inner workings of his prison society more? A six million dollar budget, that's why. It was miraculous that Carpenter, Alves, and company were able to make the world as immersive as it was.
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
You don't need an expensive budget to create a society. Star Trek TOS created cultures with tighter budgets.
@Craig-dv3ji2 жыл бұрын
I was 13 years old when this movie came out. Too perfect.
@gaba-goo3733 Жыл бұрын
Ahhh its so old they called John Carpenter a young director
@44excalibur Жыл бұрын
Gene Siskel gave "thumbs up" to both Escape From New York and The Thing while Roger gave both "thumbs down," both times where Gene was right and Roger was wrong.
@Dlj712 жыл бұрын
Adrienne Barbeau walking around half naked? Watched this last night again & didn't see any evidence as such😆
@2AMReviews4 жыл бұрын
Siskel was right.
@bobrew4614 жыл бұрын
Of course Kurt Russell meant to sound like Clint Eastwood. Carpenter even recognised this on set when they started filming. And spending more time on "...the prison society..." wasn't the point of the movie - and It would've slowed things right down. Carpenter showed us enough, and he only had $7 million to make his movie. Give the guy a break!
@kamuelalee3 жыл бұрын
Totally agree. It was a rescue and action movie not a prison movie. Watch Papillion or Escape from Alcatraz if you want a prison movie.
@81OH4Z4RD6 ай бұрын
we had a sweet tv. still only 13 channels and all but 2 of them static but push buttons instead of silly old knobs. good times.
@CeeLiberty4 жыл бұрын
Such a fun film!!!!
@gallery75964 жыл бұрын
Well, Gene's entitled to his opinion, but I think Adrienne B. is quite good as Maggie. She's not just eye candy; she plays the role with an effectively world weary cynicism, and, later on, displays some genuine emotion, too. She and Harry Dean Stanton's "Brain" make a really funny and surprisingly compelling couple.
@2cool4fluoride3 жыл бұрын
Funny how Siskel was more sympathetic to John Carpenter than Ebert
@kamuelalee3 жыл бұрын
You'd think it would be the opposite. Ebert was a weird guy. But Siskel not liking Adrienne Barbeau? I mean come on, what's not to like?!
@markdaniels71744 жыл бұрын
I like the movie but I kinda see Roger’s point. I always felt the set-up here was more interesting than the rest of the story. It’s the future, Manhattan is being used as one big prison... I’m interested. Then, well...
@BradiKal613 жыл бұрын
Its fun to see those rare instances where Gene was more on target than Roger. Gene correctly identified this flick as what we would call today a graphic novel. Roger wanted a big budget show with more scope. The budget for E.F.N.Y. was really low, and the expanded view of the NY prison society that both of these guys wanted to see would not have been possible with the money Carpenter had to work with. the entire story takes place on one evening so of course you will get only the barest glimpse of what New York had become and the feudalistic society that the Duke controls. I thought we saw just enough to give us what we needed to know and a bunch of entertaining scenery chewing from Russel and his opponents.
@wordman36242 жыл бұрын
1997 was twenty-five years ago. Geez, I feel old.
@ricardocantoral7672 Жыл бұрын
Please don't remind me how long ago 1997 was. 😫
@ShamrockParticle Жыл бұрын
Adrienne Barbeau would have made a decent Saavik (Star Trek 2) The Clint Eastwood impression was pretty good too.
@Dear1Stupit1Dog4 жыл бұрын
Right at 5:35 you can hear someone sigh. I guess they don't appreciate his criticism
@TroyShaw4 жыл бұрын
These are great!
@Tessmage_Tessera2 жыл бұрын
Great movie. I usually agree more with Ebert, but he blew it this time. As for Adrienne Barbeau, she wasn't half-naked. She's simply stacked... and if you got it, flaunt it.
@brianmacgabhann563011 ай бұрын
The music! My god: the music!
@oobrocks3 жыл бұрын
How anyone vote no for this masterpiece??
@BradiKal61 Жыл бұрын
Oh Roger!
@mmcneil77710 ай бұрын
Roger missed it! This was an all-time great cult classic!
@mikegarrens52863 жыл бұрын
In my top ten of all time!!!!
@jimmybonez89284 жыл бұрын
I pity the poor young person who was convinced from their parent/s to see the The Fox and the Hound instead of THIS!!!! FOX opened on THE SAME DAY!!!!
@jimmybonez89284 жыл бұрын
Maximus Prime WOW... INTERESTING POINT!!!!!! AND THEY ALSO SHOWS KURT’S FORMER IMAGE(FOX & HOUND) AND HIS NEW IMAGE (ESCAPE FROM NY).
@rabbas80 Жыл бұрын
Love this movie but I definitely Want to explore more on how nyc became this prison and see the nightmares taking place in Manhattan. You can probably make a tv series out of this
@DannyTheWildBoy4 жыл бұрын
I was wondering if you had a review of ebert and roepers clive barker's Hellraiser (1987) and hellraiser III Hell on Earth (1992)
@jedijones3 жыл бұрын
They never reviewed those on TV.
@philmellor48854 жыл бұрын
Wasn't Russels intention to do a Clint Eastwood impression. Of course it fucking was.
@oobrocks3 жыл бұрын
"I thought u was dead" 😆
@michaelloparco21739 ай бұрын
Mike and Jay…their successors were split as well.
@ezlmonqzy96505 ай бұрын
Thank you for me mentioning that I finished watching that review and watching the film 2 days ago for the first time it was awesome
@jasonbowser5754 Жыл бұрын
I loved the ending…lol
@RollingOrmond4 жыл бұрын
Carpenter really mocked S & E in They Live as soulless aliens. Must have not liked their reviews of him in general.
@nathanielphillips35923 жыл бұрын
BROOOO IF YOU THINK CARPENTER WAS MOCKING FILM CRITICS IM THEY LIVE YOU ARE DEAD WRONG LMAO
@maskedmarvyl47746 ай бұрын
Spoiler: The Duke eventually becomes a Scientologist. I don't know if that's better or worse for his character.
@primarchechs71393 жыл бұрын
Escape from New York has a dystopian dream-like quality to it. You don't really want to scratch it deeper than the way that Carpenter presents it or you would lose the diaphanous (un)reality of the story and the action. Manhattan is Hell and Snake is a fallen angel who struggles against the Devil (Duke) and God to achieve his own autonomy (anarchy).
@emptyhand7773 жыл бұрын
The future, 1997. Yeah, I could still dunk a basketball back then.
@derekschoenike56853 жыл бұрын
I usually agree with what Roger Ebert had to say, but I think he kinda got this one wrong. Great ending. Bandstand Boogie 🎵🎵
@ragingbull22714 жыл бұрын
Escape from New York is the one Carpenter film that hasn't aged too well for me sadly. That said, I still enjoy it. Siskel's comment about Adrienne Barbeau being a very poor actress? Come on! I know he saw Carpenter's The Fog. She is fantastic in that and the best thing about the film!
@TruthnautBegins2 жыл бұрын
Ebert was correct about the movie needing more. It was a trim 90 minute movie. Too trim.
@mikegarrens52863 жыл бұрын
This movie is brilliant!!!
@movieman1044 жыл бұрын
its rare but gene was right over roger this is a great movie one of carpentors all time best
@1111nolanc3 жыл бұрын
Usually agree with Ebert, not on this. I thought this was one of the darkest, bleak, stylish movies ever. Call me Snake...
@geoycs4 жыл бұрын
I usually agree with Roger, but in this case he’s wrong for sure!
@emptyhand7773 жыл бұрын
Kurt Russell known for Disney movies and playing Elvis on tv.
@oobrocks3 жыл бұрын
For u young people: crime in the 70s was out of hand. Putting every criminal on an is. Wasn't silly in 81
@garyrossetti24433 жыл бұрын
I thought Kurt Russell was the best thing about this Movie he a hell of a job as Snake Plisken.