Escape from New York (1981) movie review - Sneak Previews with Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel

[@steveconn]

"You've got to rescue the president." "President of what? "That's not funny, Plisken." Great dialogue!

[@bobrew461]

"So what's your answer Plissken?" "Get a new President!" I think Nick Castle wrote those funny lines... :-0

[@Craig-dv3ji]

Couldn't agree more. And that bit of dialogue you quoted is perfect.

[@MrCarpen7er]

The name is *Plissken

[@only257]

agreed

[@CR41489]

One of my favorite John Carpenter films. Love Kurt Russell as Snake Plissken and another great Carpenter score.

[@BradiKal61]

a RARE example of Gene knowing better than Roger. The ending was awesome, Plisken getting revenge on the system that used him. He doesn't care if the world burns, he has no F's left to give.

[@henryesj6242]

I'd disagree, I think Gene was way smarter than people took him for. Just as much as Ebert, to me.

[@Rasputin443556]

If you want an even better example of Gene knowing better than Roger, watch their bit about Full Metal Jacket.

[@w41duvernay]

The problem of these 2 is they want every movie to be an academy award winning movie, not entertaining a viewer for a few hours.

[@kevinbirge2130]

Gene loved genre movies, but couldn’t admit his blue-collar tastes. Watching him intellectualize liking something that you know he liked just because it was cool is one of the great pleasures this show affords.

[@mariopalos9238]

@@henryesj6242 I don't think Gene's intelligence has ever been questioned. It's just that he tended to look down on movies that a lot of people considered entertaining.

[@rauserbegins5850]

I first saw ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK on First Choice Superchannel (Canada) in 1982. I was 11. I adored the movie, and my younger brother and I watched it several times. Later, we got it on VHS videocassette. Watched it several more times. To this day, it's one of my favourite movies.

[@citygirl5705]

Ebert didn't like the ending? The ending was great!!!

[@peterkrug4124]

(SPOILER) The ending seemed to imply that Snake had just doomed the world to nuclear war.

[@travismcdonald6576]

Peter Krug Lol. Yup. Then he shut down the world in Escape From LA.

[@BradiKal61]

@@peterkrug4124 Instead we were doomed to Escape from LA

[@youtubesuresuckscock]

Ebert blew. Sorry, but his opinion sucked.

[@kevinmcdonald6477]

"YOU'RETHE DUKE (rat a tat tat) YOU'RE THE DUKE.....A # ONE." Now THAT was presidential!!!!!! Screw Air Force One! Snake and Doctor Loomis rule!!!

[@thunderstruck5484]

Earnest Borgnine was such a great actor in every role

[@LouieLouie3]

Best in The Poseiden Adventure.

[@kennealy2148]

I liked him in Convoy, he played Dirty Lyle "Cottonmouth" Wallace who chases Kris Kristofferson's character, Martin "Rubber Duck" Penwald and his convoy of truckers all over the Arizona and into the Mexican border as Rubber Duck is met by the Army and Lyle who will shoot at Rubber Duck's truck as he drives onto the bridge...

[@maskedmarvyl4774]

@@LouieLouie3, He was one of my favorite characters in the film, because he played it completely straight. He seemed to be an insane cab driver who didn't quite understand that Manhattan had been turned into a giant prison.

[@ronaldh8446]

I always agreed more with Ebert than Siskel. There were exceptions for sure and this is definitely one of them (Siskel also liked Carpenter's "The Thing" and Ebert didn't). Didn't like the ending??? The audience cheered wildly at the ending when I saw it a few times in the summer of '81. The villain's demise and the American Bandstand tape were crowd-pleasing moments and the audience ate it up.

[@BrokenGodEnt]

Ebert also somewhat famously gave Escape From L.A a 3.5 star rating out of 4. I also tended to agree with Ebert, but it's crazy to me that he said no to this much better original (imo), yet gave the sequel an almost perfect score. Don't get me wrong, I also enjoy LA a lot, but I don't think it comes close to the original.

[@ronaldh8446]

@@BrokenGodEnt Yep. He does have a valid point about L.A. being more satirical toward its culture than N.Y. was. But it's more of a silly comedy than a cynical action pic and much less rewatchable. I can watch L.A. and chuckle but N.Y. is much more entertaining.

[@chriscornelius2518]

I think John Carpenter's The Thing is the best horror film I have ever seen.

[@TheWuCepticon1981]

I was surprised that Gene Siskel actually liked The Thing, he had to be one of the few critics who did back then LOL

[@patricktilton5377]

The ending was perfect! Snake put the President to the test . . . saw how full of shit he was, how he didn't really give a shit about the world he'd been saved from or the world he was presumably trying to save with that Tape . . . so Snake--not caring himself about the shitty world people like the President had created and ruled over--allowed that world to continue its collapse, by destroying the Tape that supposedly was going to rescue everything from the brink of destruction. Just as he was deemed expendable, those tiny explosives lodged into his neck, so too was the world expendable to him. Snake was NOT a hero; just a ruthless man with the capability of getting the job done.

[@christinacascadilla4473]

This movie did not need Meryl Streep. Adrienne Barbeau was perfect for the role.

[@jedijones]

She certainly put her best feet forward.

[@shanecochran2491]

I always thought she was just an adequate actress. But always good for the most part. Not very good in Swamp Thing.

[@MrCarpen7er]

Yeah, she always had two big talents

[@WilliamHerlihy-p4g]

Her reputation precedes her...

[@kamuelalee]

Probably one of the best movies of the 1980s. Not sure why Ebert trashed it. And the ending was one of the best of any movie I've ever seen.

[@defchan1970]

“Cute” is not a word that springs to mind when I think about this movie’s ending. And Adrienne Barbeau walking around half naked was a definite plus.

[@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549]

He described the ending as cute.

[@defchan1970]

@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549 He sure did. And I just don’t see that ending as “cute,” was my point.

[@katobrucelee08]

I want that on the back of a releae "The ending was cute" - Gene Siskel @@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549

[@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549]

@@defchan1970 why are you still talking about this?

[@defchan1970]

@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549I haven’t talked about this in two years. Why the hell are YOU still talking about this?

[@Lonequacker]

Nothing is funnier than hearing "Escape From New York is set in the future in the year 1997"

[@Ron-d2s]

I was thinking Robocop and Max Headrom were set in the far flung future of the 90's. Clockwork was also set in the late 90's musta been a hard time for the world🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Not to mention Predator II🤪!!!

[@travismcdonald6576]

15 years later Ebert would praise Escape From L.A. Go figure.

[@BradiKal61]

OMG escape from LA was HORRIBLE.

[@pungisotu]

He did the same with Die Hard and Die Hard 2.

[@kentallard8852]

It is a better film, more focused, better characterisation, and great political and social satire

[@TheWuCepticon1981]

@@kentallard8852 LOL stfu, it's horrible. I'm the biggest John Carpenter and Kurt Russell fan there is and even I realize that Escape From LA is garbage. It's not even campy fun, or a guilty pleasure, it's just bad.

[@gallery7596]

@@kentallard8852 With regard to the sequel: I think they made a mistake going with virtually the same plot. Still, there's a couple great action sequences, some genuinely funny moments, and to your point about characterization, yes, Russell is just excellent as Snake. If for no other reason, "Escape From LA" needed to be made so we could see him play that role one more time.

[@MediaBuster]

One of my favorite movies... just so overall cool, badass and different.

[@bullock4211]

One of Carpenters finest masterpieces

[@TheWuCepticon1981]

Yes it is, I love Halloween. But I like Escape From New York a little bit more. And of course, The Thing is my favorite lol

[@luke9947]

The Wu-Cepticon my favourites are THE THING and THEY LIVE

[@skupena]

@@luke9947 YES! They Live is another one of Carpenter's best!

[@michaelorick2197]

Yes this one and The Fog is His two best films s

[@michaelorick2197]

I don't like they live it is aweful y

[@BackwoodsFilms]

Adrienne Barbeau walking around half naked? Count me in!

[@TheWuCepticon1981]

Yes, she was super sexy back then. John Carpenter made sure he showed his wife off LOL

[@weswolever7477]

Didn’t matter which half either

[@stevenh8174]

2 good reasons to see this film

[@mantroid]

Showing some cleavage is half-naked? Come-on, Siskel, don't be such a dork.

[@philipthomas6808]

@@TheWuCepticon1981 Probably more like John wanted to ensure his wife gave him some leg at the end of the shoot...:)

[@tinderbox218]

It's hard to explain how vivid and nightmarish (in a good way) this movie was at the time it came out. It showed a darkly realistic cyberpunk aesthetic even before "Blade Runner" or the literary genre itself had coalesced. It was meant to be comic book, and I'm sorry Ebert didn't recognize what an effective and to-be-classic anti-hero character was created by Russell here. It was the ultimate expression of the "prison film", a genre with built-in horror generated by the anxiety that law-abiding movie goers have at the prospect of being thrown into a dog-eat-dog prison world. I agree with Ebert that the ending's extreme nihilism, though an appropriate coda to what came before it, also left it on a real downer.

[@1986SSMONTECARLO]

Saw this Cult Classic at The Loews Paradise Theater, Bronx back when it first premiered in '81...GOOD TIMES!!!...GREAT MOVIE THEATER!!!

[@TheWuCepticon1981]

Lol you're lucky, I wish I could've seen this and The Thing in theaters.

[@philmellor4885]

Saw this at the Tatton cinema in south Manchester UK. Was a double bill with a flick called Visiting hours. Happy days.

[@Bacalao2929]

2016BMWi8 , I saw it in Alerton theater, not a great theater, a dump, one of coaches from PelhamParkway little league was the manager of the theater,

[@bobrew461]

@@philmellor4885 Double Bills in the UK!! Those were the days.

[@philmellor4885]

@@bobrew461 Yeah...loved a double bill. The randomness of the pairings. Gregory's Girl and Capricorn one for example sake.

[@kentallard8852]

"You may remember him from several Disney films..." - one of the reasons why Russell did this film was to cast off that child actor image.

[@kildare97]

Funny. As someone born in 97 it's everything from Escape From New York onwards that I'd know him from. Never seen any of his Disney pictures.

[@TooCooFoYou]

kildare97 Kurt Russell was basically Disney’s protege. Even in his death, he left a note that had Kurt Russell written on it.

[@sha11235]

@@kildare97 He was a child actor in Disney films.

[@sha11235]

@@TooCooFoYou He's not fuckin' dead yet.

[@kamuelalee]

This was the movie that changed him the Disney actor into a Hollywood actor.

[@robdavis4777]

I have seen this movie well over 150 times in my life. It’s a classic.

[@erichaynes7502]

This movie was great. Carpenter should have made it a trilogy with the sequels being released in the mid and late 80's. By the time he made Escape from L.A. the magic was long gone. Also, Adrienne Barbeau was perfect as a tough and beautiful woman!

[@michaelperkowski641]

Loved John carpenter's escape from New York one of my favorite movies of summer 81.

[@razorbackfilms]

Michael Perkowski I didn’t see it until it came on cable but I must have watched it every time it came on.

[@gallery7596]

Yes, 1981 was a very good year for movies.

[@phantomcollector1976]

ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK IS AN ABSOLUTE MASTERPIECE

[@TheWuCepticon1981]

Yes it is. The premise, the characters, the cinematography, atmosphere, music etc. Easily one of Carpenter's top films.

[@johnnyskinwalker4095]

calm down there lol

[@mikegarrens5286]

Thank you brother! You understand!!!!!!!

[@williamhicks7736]

It’s a fun movie but not a masterpiece... not even close...

[@phantomcollector1976]

@@williamhicks7736 THATS YOU'RE OPINION DIPSHIT

[@williamhicks7736]

Oh man! The atmosphere of the NYC prison colony makes this film so cool, I can’t believe Ebert gave it a thumb’s down... And what’s up with Siskel dissing Adrienne Barbeau? Great flick!

[@TheWuCepticon1981]

Exactly, John Carpenter's direction, music and Dean Cundey's cinematography creates such a thick and dread filled atmosphere. Also, Snake Plissken pretty much gave birth to the quintessential, stereotypical, 80s action hero, the movie is amazing. And Adrienne Barbeau was so smoking hot, she should've gotten props for that alone lol

[@jedijones]

Siskel was usually harder on actors who tried to cross from TV to movies.

[@georgeharris9873]

Siskel's an asshole. What does he know about how women dress ?

[@stevestarscream5182]

Usually agreed with ebert more often but he was way off on this one and the ending was freaking classic

[@travismcdonald6576]

Bill Megatron The irony is that Ebert was one of the few critics to like Escape From L.A.

[@kamuelalee]

One of the best endings ever in a movie.

[@geniusmode1219]

"Set in the future, in 1997" 😂😂

[@jakesli9154]

lee van cleefs cheekbones are so iconic they should get their own billing in the credits.

[@kevinbirge2130]

I remember watching this back then. I was in 7th grade when I discovered this show. I still find them great viewing.

[@VirtualLunacy]

Escape from New York is a classic!!

[@Mondomeyer]

Strange that when reviewing 'Prince of Darkness', Siskel said that Carpenter hadn't done anything interesting since 'Halloween', yet he liked this one. What do you expect from critics, consistency?

[@sha11235]

He forgot I guess.

[@75aces97]

6:19 Funny Ebert says this about endings. If you watch 1980's movies, any genre, it seems like a LOT of them didn't reach a conclusion, so much as they hit a payoff scene, then just sort of stumbled to the credits. That's not the worst thing, since a 2010's version of the same story would probably have 20-minute denouement, but it's a weird idiosyncrasy of 80's films.

[@jasonmeadows8510]

I disagree with Siskel and Ebert regarding their shared criticism of the film, that it didn't go more in depth "about the prison society in Manhattan". Well, it's a movie, not a documentary. There's only so much time the director has to tell the story. Carpenter did it right; he focused on Plissken's perspective of things.

[@gallery7596]

Yes, I think delving more deeply into the prison society might only have served to slow the pace of what is essentially an action film, not (as you so correctly observed) a documentary. Now in the sequel they did step away from the plot to take a closer look at the culture of the LA prison society and I think that only served to bring the movie to a virtual halt. Carpenter's instincts were definitely more on the money with the original.

[@kamuelalee]

Totally agree. The setup is that NYC is a prison...that's only the setup and setting of the picture. The real action is all about Snake rescuing the president.

[@ricardocantoral7672]

I actually agree with Roger on that point. The Manhattan Prison should have been a fully realized world.

[@johnherne8489]

Absolutely. It's kind of funny watching these old movie reviews from Siskel and Ebert. They also didn't like Blade Runner.

[@alexpilgrim8248]

It's funny that Ebert didn't like the ending, but loved the ending of L.A.

[@das81]

Gene Siskel loved it? WTF!?

[@TheWuCepticon1981]

Yeah it's weird how he liked that and The Thing LOL I usually agree with Ebert, but not with these two movies.

[@kamuelalee]

But he hates everything? LOL

[@TimeAxisMedia]

Michael, I've been looking for their review of EFNY for years. Thanks!

[@gaba-goo3733]

Ahhh its so old they called John Carpenter a young director

[@TimeAxisMedia]

I remember wondering if Gene's comment about Adrienne Barbeau hurt her feelings. That wasn't nice, Gene!

[@shenloken2]

Everytime I see Kurt Russell and Lee Van Kleef talk to one another it seems like a conversation between Solid Snake and Revolver Ocelot. Hideo Kojima after all lists Escape from New York as one of his many influences.

[@necromancer6897]

And he was channeling Eastwood

[@kamuelalee]

There seemed to be some nods toward early Eastwood movies...including having actor Lee Van Cleef in the film, Cleef being in two Eastwood Spagetti Westerns.

[@Locadel2003]

This movie & The thing basically made Kurt russel a legend and what he is now. Because before those, he did an excellent performance in Elvis (1979) where he played Elvis but that was a forgotten tv movie and wasnt a big movie. So thanks also for Escape from new york

[@OuterGalaxyLounge]

Interesting to come to this right after watching your clip of their review of The Warriors, as both flicks are about a mission deep into crumbling New York that involves avoiding dangerous gangs. Escape from New York is a satisfying if mildly imperfect realization of its premise. I'd actually have liked it more if it had explored the mysterious city even more and been longer, and maybe had a slightly larger budget to open up that vast world. Still, there's nothing to criticize about the story, characters or rough-and-ready confidence of Carpenter's direction.

[@scraps992]

I just saw it. You seem to know what you're on about, so I'll bring this up to you. I didn't like it. I didn't outright hate it because its premise was slightly intriguing and it did remind me of The Warriors, if only a bit too much. What was on display seemed very shallow to me, I didn't understand the motivations of the main antagonist who was so gung-ho about keeping the ill-obtained president that he was willing to risk life and limb. For what? Ransom? Money? Freedom? Or to dress him up in a wig? The whole deathclock subplot was nonsensical in that it actually hindered the mission. What if he got a beat on the president 10 minutes later than when he had gotten him? It's an excuse for pointless predictable drama that didn't need to be there. And why did the president fly over that airspace to begin with? Carpenter is usually a great filmmaker, but his touch here seemed to outright lack confidence. Both the sound and visual editing were off and it made for an awkward movie. I just don't understand why people like it. 4/10.

[@catrachocolo]

1. The main antagonist's motivation is clearly stated in the movie. 2. The deathclock prevents Plissken from escaping. Yes, it lowers his chances of actually accomplishing his mission, but without it there would be no chance at all, because the he would simply abandon the mission and disappear. Again, this is explained in the movie. 3. The president's plane was hijacked and intentionally crashed in Manhattan. And again, this is shown in the film. Did you not pay any attention whatsoever while watching the movie? Or are you one of those moviegoers who need everything spelled out for them (I didn't understand...., Why did....) and still don't get it? Disike the film all you want, but at least come up with valid criticism. And please learn the difference between personally liking/not liking a movie and a movie actually being good/bad from a filmmaking point of view.

[@scraps992]

@@catrachocolo Wow, okay. Needless aggression there, but whatever. It's now been going on three months since watching it, so maybe my responses aren't valid, but I'll give it a try anyway. What is the villain's motivation? Seems to me, all they did with the president is torture and humiliate him. And they're worried about him skipping out and escaping from a mission that's set in a city-sized super prison? Seems to me they could just track him and promise to neutralize him if he tries anything rather than putting the life of the president in the hands of a traitor and psychopath hooked up to a death device. I don't care what you say about that. It's a plot hole. Plain and simple. With the third one, fine. I'll concede to that one. Maybe I just missed that part. And you know what? Maybe I didn't pay much attention to the movie at certain points. Can you figure out why? Because I wasn't enjoying it and I was getting exceptionally bored with Russel's constant whispering and the shallow-as-hell development of the world in which this is set. The entire setting feels more like a prop - something to allow for Carpenter's imaginings to be half-heartedly realized without putting much work into the overall immersion of the film. It's shallow, slow and stupid. These are valid criticisms, and just because you don't like hearing it, it doesn't mean that they aren't valid. You have every right to like this movie, but every movie has flaws. It just depends on whether or not those flaws hold the film back in your opinion. And I can very much enjoy a movie that doesn't have everything spelled out the viewer. Know what my fifth favorite movie is? 2001: A Space Odyssey. That explains less than EFNY, but it feels like I'm actually watching something transpire. Escape from New York feels dead on arrival and totally soulless. It's cinematic junk food and not even satisfying junk food at that. There. Notice how I wasn't aggressive? Now it's your turn.

[@robertf2017]

The ironic thing is Roger Ebert created the “Stanton Rule” that stated any film with Harry Dean Stanton couldn’t be bad. (He made this years after “Escape From New York”) he also changed his view of the film years later.

[@lowbridge7070]

In 1981 the crime problem in new york city was so bad and getting worse, that at the time it wasnt much of an unrealistic concept for the island of manhattan to be turned into one giant prison. Crime was so out of hand, it seemed like a logical and easier solution.

[@TotalMeltdown2]

Escape New York is more serious. Escape LA is more of a satire/parody. I like them both

[@jmjfanss]

I hated escape from l.a.

[@TotalMeltdown2]

@@jmjfanss Would you care to explain why you hate it? Just curious

[@ricardocantoral7672]

I didn't like Escape from LA upon my initial viewing but I am tempted to give it a second watch.

[@maskedmarvyl4774]

Spoiler: The Duke eventually becomes a Scientologist. I don't know if that's better or worse for his character.

[@Dlj71]

Adrienne Barbeau walking around half naked? Watched this last night again & didn't see any evidence as such😆

[@davidmarshall7752]

"This is Hell, this is Fate, But now this is your world and it's great ! So rejoice, pop a cork... Buddy, every-one's coming to New York! New York !"

[@jedijones]

"You're Snake Plissken?" Does he not look exactly like a "Snake Plissken?"

[@sir_john_hammond]

Everyone thought he'd be taller, apparently.

[@jedijones]

@@sir_john_hammond He's pretty short for an ex-con.

[@OroborusFMA]

The ending was consistent with the nihilism throughout. These guys are nuts.

[@michaelorick2197]

The ending is great

[@kitchenerleslie2755]

The reason why we didn't see the rest of the prison society was because of the low budget

[@ricardocantoral7672]

True, but Roger had a point about the underdeveloped characters.

[@Dear1Stupit1Dog]

Right at 5:35 you can hear someone sigh. I guess they don't appreciate his criticism

[@michaelloparco2173]

Mike and Jay…their successors were split as well.

[@ezlmonqzy9650]

Thank you for me mentioning that I finished watching that review and watching the film 2 days ago for the first time it was awesome

[@wordman3624]

1997 was twenty-five years ago. Geez, I feel old.

[@ricardocantoral7672]

Please don't remind me how long ago 1997 was. 😫

[@phantasm8180]

for me is a big YES

[@Craig-dv3ji]

I was 13 years old when this movie came out. Too perfect.

[@johnnyskinwalker4095]

How great was Lee Van Cliff

[@ricardocantoral7672]

He became famous roughly around the time he seriously considered giving up acting.

[@johnnyskinwalker4095]

@@ricardocantoral7672 I see this a lot where actors reach a certain age, their legend statue explodes. I think it's usualy a mark of respect.

[@ricardocantoral7672]

@@johnnyskinwalker4095 I could understand his frustration. Before the spaghetti westerns, Van Cleef was a minor league actor whose best known roles were in films that were merely seen as B grade crime dramas such as The Big Combo and Kansas City Confidential. These days, both films are now considered classics.

[@michaelorick2197]

I love Escape from New york

[@THX-kw2jh]

Adrienne Barbeau may have been a "poor actress", but she was a Very Beautiful Desirable Woman, in my opinion perfect for this role & movie.

[@briannewman532]

Siskel went a little hard on Adrienne Barbeau calling her a terrible actress, two of the best things in this movie belong to her.

[@gallery7596]

Well, Gene's entitled to his opinion, but I think Adrienne B. is quite good as Maggie. She's not just eye candy; she plays the role with an effectively world weary cynicism, and, later on, displays some genuine emotion, too. She and Harry Dean Stanton's "Brain" make a really funny and surprisingly compelling couple.

[@2AMReviews]

Siskel was right.

[@BradiKal61]

Its fun to see those rare instances where Gene was more on target than Roger. Gene correctly identified this flick as what we would call today a graphic novel. Roger wanted a big budget show with more scope. The budget for E.F.N.Y. was really low, and the expanded view of the NY prison society that both of these guys wanted to see would not have been possible with the money Carpenter had to work with. the entire story takes place on one evening so of course you will get only the barest glimpse of what New York had become and the feudalistic society that the Duke controls. I thought we saw just enough to give us what we needed to know and a bunch of entertaining scenery chewing from Russel and his opponents.

[@81OH4Z4RD]

we had a sweet tv. still only 13 channels and all but 2 of them static but push buttons instead of silly old knobs. good times.

[@2cool4fluoride]

Funny how Siskel was more sympathetic to John Carpenter than Ebert

[@kamuelalee]

You'd think it would be the opposite. Ebert was a weird guy. But Siskel not liking Adrienne Barbeau? I mean come on, what's not to like?!

[@markdaniels7174]

I like the movie but I kinda see Roger’s point. I always felt the set-up here was more interesting than the rest of the story. It’s the future, Manhattan is being used as one big prison... I’m interested. Then, well...

[@tekharthazenyatta2310]

Why didn't John Carpenter explore the inner workings of his prison society more? A six million dollar budget, that's why. It was miraculous that Carpenter, Alves, and company were able to make the world as immersive as it was.

[@ricardocantoral7672]

You don't need an expensive budget to create a society. Star Trek TOS created cultures with tighter budgets.

[@ShamrockParticle]

Adrienne Barbeau would have made a decent Saavik (Star Trek 2) The Clint Eastwood impression was pretty good too.

[@44excalibur]

Gene Siskel gave "thumbs up" to both Escape From New York and The Thing while Roger gave both "thumbs down," both times where Gene was right and Roger was wrong.

[@DannyTheWildBoy]

I was wondering if you had a review of ebert and roepers clive barker's Hellraiser (1987) and hellraiser III Hell on Earth (1992)

[@jedijones]

They never reviewed those on TV.

[@zippymufo9765]

Ebert could be such a humorless snob at times.

[@CeeLiberty]

Such a fun film!!!!

[@bobrew461]

Of course Kurt Russell meant to sound like Clint Eastwood. Carpenter even recognised this on set when they started filming. And spending more time on "...the prison society..." wasn't the point of the movie - and It would've slowed things right down. Carpenter showed us enough, and he only had $7 million to make his movie. Give the guy a break!

[@kamuelalee]

Totally agree. It was a rescue and action movie not a prison movie. Watch Papillion or Escape from Alcatraz if you want a prison movie.

[@philmellor4885]

Wasn't Russels intention to do a Clint Eastwood impression. Of course it fucking was.

[@RenR70]

You can’t always judge a movie like it’s a academy award winning drama, sometimes you just have to take it for what it is and enjoy it.

[@maxxxmodelz4061]

I think that's what Gene was saying here. Funny though, because if you look back on the majority of the films reviewed by S&E, Ebert is usually the one favoring films like this one and pointing out the artistic merits of some of the more violent films while Gene was always the one who couldn't understand why graphic violence was shown at all.

[@oobrocks]

How anyone vote no for this masterpiece??

[@TroyShaw]

These are great!

[@mikegarrens5286]

In my top ten of all time!!!!

[@BradiKal61]

Oh Roger!

[@primarchechs7139]

Escape from New York has a dystopian dream-like quality to it. You don't really want to scratch it deeper than the way that Carpenter presents it or you would lose the diaphanous (un)reality of the story and the action. Manhattan is Hell and Snake is a fallen angel who struggles against the Devil (Duke) and God to achieve his own autonomy (anarchy).

[@RollingOrmond]

Carpenter really mocked S & E in They Live as soulless aliens. Must have not liked their reviews of him in general.

[@nathanielphillips3592]

BROOOO IF YOU THINK CARPENTER WAS MOCKING FILM CRITICS IM THEY LIVE YOU ARE DEAD WRONG LMAO

[@brianmacgabhann5630]

The music! My god: the music!

[@ragingbull2271]

Escape from New York is the one Carpenter film that hasn't aged too well for me sadly. That said, I still enjoy it. Siskel's comment about Adrienne Barbeau being a very poor actress? Come on! I know he saw Carpenter's The Fog. She is fantastic in that and the best thing about the film!

[@rabbas80]

Love this movie but I definitely Want to explore more on how nyc became this prison and see the nightmares taking place in Manhattan. You can probably make a tv series out of this

[@oobrocks]

"I thought u was dead" 😆

[@derekschoenike5685]

I usually agree with what Roger Ebert had to say, but I think he kinda got this one wrong. Great ending. Bandstand Boogie 🎵🎵

[@TruthnautBegins]

Ebert was correct about the movie needing more. It was a trim 90 minute movie. Too trim.

[@oobrocks]

For u young people: crime in the 70s was out of hand. Putting every criminal on an is. Wasn't silly in 81

[@emptyhand777]

The future, 1997. Yeah, I could still dunk a basketball back then.

[@jayazathoth8530]

I agree with them, the prison society could've been fascinating and terrifying if they'd fleshed it out a bit more. This is a movie I actually would like a reboot of, where we see this happen over the whole of NY: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iXi8qmysZ9NknZI

[@1111nolanc]

Usually agree with Ebert, not on this. I thought this was one of the darkest, bleak, stylish movies ever. Call me Snake...

[@mikem591]

Roger missed it! This was an all-time great cult classic!

[@mikegarrens5286]

This movie is brilliant!!!

[@geoycs]

I usually agree with Roger, but in this case he’s wrong for sure!

[@nazur72]

Wow, I wonder if that's how it will look in 1997... that's so far away. 🤔

[@jimmybonez8928]

I pity the poor young person who was convinced from their parent/s to see the The Fox and the Hound instead of THIS!!!! FOX opened on THE SAME DAY!!!!

[@jimmybonez8928]

Maximus Prime WOW... INTERESTING POINT!!!!!! AND THEY ALSO SHOWS KURT’S FORMER IMAGE(FOX & HOUND) AND HIS NEW IMAGE (ESCAPE FROM NY).

[@movieman104]

its rare but gene was right over roger this is a great movie one of carpentors all time best

[@jasonbowser5754]

I loved the ending…lol

[@garyrossetti2443]

I thought Kurt Russell was the best thing about this Movie he a hell of a job as Snake Plisken.

[@emptyhand777]

Kurt Russell known for Disney movies and playing Elvis on tv.

[@BradiKal61]

I will always love this movie. I will always hate Escape from LA because it was the epitiome of a successful cult film that manages to parody itself and forgets what made the first a success. Highlander 2 was another example.