Essential AI Research Assistants: Tools Transforming Research Today!

AI research assistants are revolutionizing the way we approach academic and professional inquiries, offering an array of specialized tools designed to enhance the efficiency and depth of research activities.
▼ ▽ Sign up for my FREE newsletter
Join 19,000+ email subscribers receiving the free tools and academic tips directly from me:
andrewstapleton.com.au/newsle...
▼ ▽ MY COURSES AND EBOOKS ▼ ▽
▶ Become a Master Academic Writer With AI using my course: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ Use my Ultimate PhD Kickstart: 12 Point Success System for Aspiring PhDs to start your PhD strong: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ My best KZbin advice curated into an an easy to follow course, Effortless Academia: academy.academiainsider.com/c...
▶ Applying for a PhD? Get my FREE PhD application resource pack to apply with confidence: www.subscribepage.com/freeapp...
▶ Learn what I wish I had known before starting my PhD in my ebook bundle: academiainsider.com/ebook-bun...
These AI research tools harness artificial intelligence to provide assistance that ranges from simple data collection to complex analysis and interpretation of scientific papers. As technology progresses, the integration of AI tools for research into daily tasks is becoming more seamless and impactful.
One of the key features of these AI tools for research paper preparation is their ability to sift through vast amounts of data to find relevant information. This capability not only saves time but also ensures that the quality of research is enhanced by accessing the most pertinent and up-to-date information. For students and professionals alike, this means that preparing a research paper no longer has to be a daunting task filled with endless hours of searching for resources.
The best AI tools go beyond just finding and organizing information. They analyze text for key concepts, suggest related topics, and can even generate summaries of lengthy documents which are particularly useful for anyone looking to streamline their research process. These summaries provide a quick overview of a document's content, making it easier to decide whether a full read is necessary or if the summarized information suffices for the researcher’s needs.
................................................
▼ ▽ TIMESTAMPS
00:00 AI Tools for research
00:13 Semantic Search AI Tool
00:27 Consensus AI
01:06 Elicit Ai Tool
02:12 SciSpace
09:28 Seed Papers
................................................
▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED ACADEMIC TOOLS AND SERVICES
▶ Recommended Apps, Books and Courses: academiainsider.com/recommend...
AI TOOLS
▶ Best PhD Writing Tool - Writefull - link.andrewstapleton.com.au/w... (Get 10% off with my link)
▶ Best Literature Search - Litmaps - app.litmaps.co (Get 10% off with code STAPLETON)
▶ Best Literature Review Writing Tool - Jenni.ai - jenni.ai/ (Get 20% off with code ANDY20)
▼ ▽ RECOMMENDED KZbin TOOLS AND SERVICES
▶ VidIQ - vidiq.com/drandy
▶ Camera - Canon EOS 650D amzn.to/3aDOog6
▶ On camera mic - amzn.to/3iMTzx0
▶ Webcam - amzn.to/43a8YyP
▶ Shotgun microphone - amzn.to/34gzcUX
▶ Portable recorder - amzn.to/3kUzF53
▶ Lighting - amzn.to/2YgbAfv
▼ ▽ Socials for shorts and reels
Instagram: / drandystapleton
TikTok: / drandystapleton

[@mayankchhaperwal4108]

Hi Andy. I follow your channel for most of the advice regarding PhD and everything related to it. Over the past few months I tried to try the tools you have been show casing but it is becoming difficult to keep track of so many of these AI tools and websites. This is also because many of these have such a large overlap in there functionalities. It would be very helpful if you could make a video summarising your own AI videos into categories. For example as a section in the video you can talk about all the AI writing tools you have discussed till now and the 1 or 2 you recommend everyone to try and then maybe other such sections can be AI tools for literature review, for data processing etc. Thanks for all the help. I really appreciate your videos.

[@snoopywalker1881]

Love your videos. It’s like Russel Brand had a PHD and is excitedly sharing his tips and tricks !

Thanks for all of your work. I’m sharing your videos with students.

[@TheHistoryCode125]

This video is basically a 10 minute ad for this guy's course on AI research assistants. He throws a bunch of tools at you like Consensus, Elicit, Sciaspace, Perplexity, and Argo, but doesn't really explain how to use them effectively. He just shows the basic interface of each tool and says "it's really great." What he's NOT telling you is that these tools require careful prompting and critical evaluation of the results. Don't expect to just type in a question and get a perfect answer! He briefly mentions Connected Papers, but only for finding derivative works, completely ignoring its potential for exploring entire research landscapes. Overall, this video is more hype than substance. You're better off looking for in-depth tutorials on specific tools and learning how to critically evaluate AI-generated research.

[@adnanpuskar645]

Thanks for reasearch help.Sir you are great

[@BybbyCreme]

stunning tools! thank you for your effort :)

[@eliaszeray7981]

Great ! thank u.

[@justaname999]

I have used all of these before but still would add a caveat, just in case people have too much faith in machine learning applications: Any of these models are generally fairly capable but never rely fully on these tools to summarize papers faithfully. One thing are errors of misinterpretation, which you can usually easily check by quickly glancing at the abstract or conclusions. But the other thing are errors of omission, which are harder to find. I've had several cases where these things gave completely wrong answers about methodology. Now it doesn't matter if you'll go over the recommended papers anyway but I'm seeing some stressed student using it and just putting that into their lit review and it being completely wrong. Generally, these models are not yet as amazing for summarization as we'd like them to be. Tools like the individual columns of scispace can be useful because they can, indeed, make use of individual flags for the compilation of the points they extract but they will fail to produce a good, coherent summary in the majority of cases.

[@ahmedmostafa247]

Consensus ❤ game over

[@ogbonnayaagom-eze6854]

Ride on Doc!

[@quickestsleets]

Hi Dr andy got a quick question. As an undergrad who has barely done any research reports in school, which course on your site would be best?

[@dipenshah6660]

Is there scispace like tool to research international court judgments? or can we add this kind of literature research functionality to free database of judgments like worldlii?

[@justaname999]

I would be cautious with that. In terms of good use cases: as a tool to quickly search cases, it might be useful. Especially if the prompts are good. But some major drawbacks are the really high rate of errors of omission and some factual inaccuracy. The latter might be easy to find, while the former is essentially impossible to find without a major investment of time.

[@mehdiberber8395]

Super hero power ❤

[@farzanhussain9427]

Hello sir I hope you will response to this comment. Actually I am writing 2 research paper and the methodology is same just the dataset is different , so can I write the same content in methodology for both my papers or will it be consider as plagiarism?

[@WhySoBroke]

Publish one paper with the detailed methodology and then cite your paper in the methods section with brief method summary in the second paper

[@gianluca.pastorelli]

​@@WhySoBroke I see two problems there: self-citation, and the lack of detail which for sure at least one peer reviewer will complain about. My advice, especially if you are planning to submit both papers more or less at the same time, write the complete procedure in both, perhaps changing terms and style slightly to make it look less copy-paste

[@Rico_1970]

Don’t you think it’s getting more and more boring? I’m following your channel a couple of years now, but in the last year my impression is that your videos are only a marketing channel for AI tools. I am missing your videos where you were talking about research topics and which really gave very useful information. But now…. Repeatedly the same AI buzz word bingo. AI tools will not help anybody if they have not understood the research process and how to write a paper at all.

[@zapy422]

felling same too much AI tool coverage, really too much

[@marsalien4]

The last couple weeks I've considered making this same exact comment, but not doing it because I thought I was the only one. But, yeah, I really miss when this channel wasn't just "here's more AI"--even a couple weeks ago, a video that seemingly wasn't about AI based on the title, two minutes in switched to being a video pushing AI.

[@tomkrieger]

Yes and No, i guess... really, i think that it could be, but in fact i think that he is showing that is not necessary to have a brain to do a Phd anymore, but instead, AI is ready to cover human failure and inteligence, and none will know that was made by AI, which means that u can keep running the machinery called "academia"

[@gianluca.pastorelli]

It is clearly a sign that academy and research have changed substantially in the last couple of years

[@biri4210]

another great video! thanks, Andy!! hey, where do you buy your colorful t-shirts? I'd love to gift my husband with one like yours :)

[@DrAndyStapleton]

I make the T-Shirts myself - but loads of people ask me about them - I should start a store :)

[@markrosenberg4369]

But very little that edits PowerPoint files using academic manuscripts to learn, adapt and produce new PowerPoint files!

[@markrosenberg4369]

Copilot doesn't do anything like this.

[@liamduffy5276]

most important thing to speed up is me. Also, how sure are you that these aren't giving out BS references?