Establishing Harm in Tort Law Part I: But-for Causation and Proximate Causation [No. 86]

[@eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807]

Or, Would it be ridiculous if a person who is able to contact someone trustworthy and knowledgeable facilitated contact, so that I have a person to talk with ... ? Is that too much to ask?

[@eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807]

It's ussless ....

[@eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807]

It may sound like, when it comes to COVID the issue is a question of vaccination, one of education, in science, statistics and seriousness of outcome, or convictions, however, it seems like the issue is confusion around duty of care and causation. It looks like the consensus is, that the extent to which being vaccinated eliminates transmission, is uncertain, therefore, a civic duty argument for being vaccinated to minimise transmission, to eliminate causation as a factor with certainty, seems moot, and as a precautionary burden, not the most pragmatic. If on the other hand, the idea of vaccination is to provide, at a lower intensity, an immune response to give a memory for the body on how to deal with a virus if it should encounter it again, then, perhaps, it is that the government ought to have a duty of care to make vaccinations available and accessible, with and through educational information, however, it sounds like it is as if the body has no memory if there is a variation of the virus, and, there are new variations of the virus each season, then, on balancing competing beneficial outcomes, it may not be of social utility to expect that COVID vaccinations ought to be available, taken or made to be taken, by all?

[@eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807]

How about legal aid? Or, are they in the pockets of aged care facility builders/owners? Did you know, that there a cultures in Australia, where it is ok for a guy to instantly move on from a marriage to partner up with another person, yet, it is isn't ok for the woman to move on, and if a mother, until maybe their child or children are grown up, and, it acceptable for the guy to not really bare responsibility, but, for his parents to when it comes to the children, and to a certain extent, the woman? How can a woman move on in a community like that, when resources aren't there to be able to move on? .... (hint: a shelter or legal service for women is not the answer.) ... what sort of lawyer insists you as an adult agree to live somewhere, in property owned by your husband's parents, when you don't want to in a family matter ... ? Apparently, facilities make their money when people move on, not when people buy in, so the higher the turn over rate, the higher the profit. How confident are you investing in a family home building company, who leaves the mother of their child/grandchild, homeless? Are they an award winning business? (HIA/MBA ... ? ... Housing Industry Association/Master Builders Association ... ?) How confident are you in decision making, in a family law firm, who in their professional ethical reasoning are ok with a party not having the means for a lawyer when the other party or parties have the means for those lawyers?

[@eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807]

No one cares ...