Great Video Christian! Keep up the good work on Estlecam :)
@ivanstroganov54589 жыл бұрын
great explanation
@austo20108 жыл бұрын
How does step over behave in regards to this? is it calculated the same as if the tool was larger, or does it effect the toroidal stepover?
@AlexLipkovich7 жыл бұрын
Please make video of example how to use it at live
@ulrichkliegis41389 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't it be possible to save some more time and reduce the vector count if one shortens the idling back path where the tool is not in active milling touch with the workpiece? Letting the tool travel the whole back path in a circle seems to create some unnecessary overhead. Or would the non-harmonic motion shake up the machine?
@ChristianKnuell9 жыл бұрын
I've tried this but as you've already guessed it just shakes the machine. It also causes acceleration spikes forcing the machine to slow down in advance to avoid losing steps. Especially when you want to be as fast as possible and get close to the machines limits you'll lose speed this way instead of gaining.
@ulrichkliegis41389 жыл бұрын
Besides that, the circular pattern resembles a larger diameter tool and thus makes the calculation of the toolpath potentially simpler.
@ulrichkliegis41389 жыл бұрын
Just happened to see this: (can't insert a link here, strange), so look for 'Adaptive Clearing at Pier 9' here on youtube. Same philosophy, next step.