There is a saying here in the US: The largest air force in the world is the US Airforce, the second largest is the US Navy.
@fathotdog71804 жыл бұрын
and the third is the us army air force
@andypham42164 жыл бұрын
Technically i think the army has more aircraft than the navy if you arent just counting fixed wing craft.
@A_Name_4 жыл бұрын
If you count our amphibious assault ships we have 20 or carriers total.
@fjallabrjotur4 жыл бұрын
@@andypham4216 I was about to come in here and prove you wrong. But the Army actually does have more Aircrafts than the Navy; if you aren't only counting fixed-winged aircrafts. Those helicopters really boast the Army forward in that aspect lol.
@Gunfox614 жыл бұрын
@@fjallabrjotur and the army has the most ships as well. They are all transport ships. Suck it squids. US Army is still the best. Chair force we still take your cute girls. But hey the navy still has the marines
@louferrao20444 жыл бұрын
As a retired US Army soldier it makes my heart warm when a NATO ally soldier takes the time to understand our weapon systems. Now I have to brush up on Estonia's armed forces! Thanks Artur..
@Brian-ci3jc4 жыл бұрын
This is heartwarming, thanks for your service!
@markwalker34994 жыл бұрын
Lou, "Now I have to brush up on Estonia's armed forces!" I think you just did!
@richardsmith69954 жыл бұрын
There's a good movie '1944' on Estonias' ww2 experience. Some conscripted by Germany, some by Soviets, fighting each other. Good movie.
@echo52264 жыл бұрын
We had an Estonian in our Basic Training over at Ft. Knox. Some kind of transfer program between the two countries. Really young guy. Anyway, this guy had a big accent and the Drill Seargents used to like messing with him in a friendly way. They would ask him in front of the formation what's he doing in America. He used to yell out loud "Drill Seargent, I'm in America because I want to see big American titties." That would have the Drill Seargents laughing and with a big smile. You can tell Drill Seargents really liked that guy.
@WaaaHoo1004 жыл бұрын
@@Brian-ci3jc p]!
@thegooseisin69104 жыл бұрын
“It’s unfair but we’re on the same side so I don’t care” I love that
@Darthybuddy4 жыл бұрын
I’m to tired to look up who said it but as the saying goes. “If you are in a fair fight, you have already failed”
@susanmaggiora48004 жыл бұрын
TheGooseIsIn Exactly. I don’t want any of our men & women in harm’s way fighting a fair war. I want them to have overwhelming force at their disposal...
@slatondragon4 жыл бұрын
@@Darthybuddy My preference is the quote "if you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck."
@masteropower65424 жыл бұрын
@@slatondragon I prefer this quote "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making some other poor damn bastard die for his." - George S. Patton
@andrewzimmer40154 жыл бұрын
You also gotta keep in mind us here in America are thousands of miles away from the rest of y’all the big countries so we need to be able to get the places where the battle will happen.
@angrytwxgaming84234 жыл бұрын
ALSO I love that taiwan is a "friendly nation" China must be EXTRA PISSED
@punitdas52074 жыл бұрын
yes
@Adrian-qr6gk4 жыл бұрын
i hope the US can help Taiwan show it's desire for independence, i saw a video of a WHO official ignoring taiwan asking a question that implied they would be recognized as an independent entity, such a crime to allow China to force itself upon others.
@deanladue53679 ай бұрын
Getting angry with Japan too, since the Japanese Navy just received the go ahead to build 3 more aircraft carriers, which would their total up to 5.
@GeraldTheChampionOfEarth4 жыл бұрын
As an American, these videos make me feel so weirdly patriotic
@alecparks86804 жыл бұрын
Yes It does
@alecparks86804 жыл бұрын
But I'm always patriotic
@kriddius4 жыл бұрын
Nothing inspires national pride like a powerful military and crippling, unending debt
@4gerars5004 жыл бұрын
@@kriddius i rather be in debt then dead or held a slave in something
@kriddius4 жыл бұрын
@@4gerars500 there's about 180 countries in the world who are free and don't have aircraft carriers. The US won't suddenly become slaves. lose their freedom or spontaneously explode if they spent less on their military. You could cut America's defense spending by over 80% and still boast a world class defense force if they were also willing to surrender their monstrous ego, paranoia and need to govern the world through intimidation as the unofficial police force of everyone everywhere
@jonny777bike4 жыл бұрын
"America will never be destroyed from the outside if we falter and lose our freedoms it will be because we destroyed ourselves" Abraham Lincoln.
@garyweber43334 жыл бұрын
true look at whats happening right now
@muck68524 жыл бұрын
Its happening .
@josephlynch76554 жыл бұрын
Lincoln didn't care about freedom. He stepped all over the Constitution for his War of Northern Aggression.
@frankynewman84624 жыл бұрын
@@josephlynch7655 liberal
@MGMCB2012able4 жыл бұрын
@@josephlynch7655 Tell that to the freed slaves.
@edwardbryan95014 жыл бұрын
Reason for many USA carriers; “Speak softly and carry a big stick” -U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919)
@monkeman3194 жыл бұрын
You got the wrong line it was Carry big penis
@tixeright91204 жыл бұрын
yep, also I think "Big Stick" and "Floating Fortress" should definitely be future USS carrier names, you know whenever we get tired of naming them after US presidents.
@joshuafischer6844 жыл бұрын
The US also has effectively singlehandedly ensured safe trade for the entire world. Piracy is basically extinct because the US Navy is a comically large sword above the neck of any would-be pirate.
@ivantheteribul4 жыл бұрын
"Compensating for something, aren't you, Americans?" "Weak allies, that's what."
@joshuafischer6844 жыл бұрын
@@ivantheteribul God fucking DAMN it feels good to be a nation that has enough firepower to crack the planet in half.
@safespacebear4 жыл бұрын
"china must be very angry about that" Yeah...that's why we do it
@EagleFang744 жыл бұрын
Yeah it’s called a float by. You float past China real slow blasting gangsta rap.
@mntlyunstable4 жыл бұрын
@@EagleFang74 ** passes China while blasting fortunate son**
@josephreeves40444 жыл бұрын
Yeah
@danh83023 жыл бұрын
China wants to claim all the seas and all the lands. It’s freedom of navigation, the USN guarantees this with their war ships. Though obviously China contests this.
@eddielongshanks97403 жыл бұрын
And we need to keep doing it until they stop stealing our sh!t... :-D
@Jon6514 жыл бұрын
The definition of an American aircraft carrier - "Four acres of nuclear-armed and nuclear-powered sovereign American territory. With its own air force."
@herehere31844 жыл бұрын
mmm we all bitch at one another and have our own political views but damnit im proud 2 be an American
@codandmgsrock4 жыл бұрын
perfection
@jimmyboy1314 жыл бұрын
Only in America
@sfranger504 жыл бұрын
I think as a matter of policy that U.S. Navy Aircraft carriers no longer carry nuclear weapons, but they are still nuclear powered.
@frankmueller27814 жыл бұрын
@@sfranger50 willing to bet on that? (Regardless of what the Government says in public)
@sumthing_cited88454 жыл бұрын
British when America becomes the strongest military and has the most aircraft carriers: British: I R A I S E D T H A T B O I
@WuzzyYT4 жыл бұрын
And most of us just say shut up dad
@hazmat85474 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@drewb.40694 жыл бұрын
reading your comment with the british accent
@trevortrevortsr24 жыл бұрын
Some shit that America does recently like crippling Irans economy, handing Palestine to WW2 Jewish migrants or butt-kissing North Korea means many British are uneasy about getting to close to the Trump-style US
@badlandskid4 жыл бұрын
Ok boomer
@edp.19174 жыл бұрын
My son is on the USS Roosevelt Carrier and will be ordering a cup soon. You are becoming a popular channel amongst our military. Awesome!
@zappya34384 жыл бұрын
i truly respect Artur Rehi, he is the perfect KZbinr to burn out my time mad respect from Korea, south
@koolaidjammer71084 жыл бұрын
Is your name pronounced differently in Korea, I’m American by the way
@noneofyourbusiness94894 жыл бұрын
@@koolaidjammer7108 His name in Korean probably isn't Jason.....
@abhiv.f.16284 жыл бұрын
I felt that "south"
@warroomproductions4 жыл бұрын
Damn, I was thinking North Korea ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@bigfloppa63284 жыл бұрын
Damn, you speak amazing English, nice job!
@bobtehdinosaur4 жыл бұрын
Artur: "these carriers are expensive, who's paying for them?" Taxpayers: ....
@fouronetwo8134 жыл бұрын
Tax payers who's parents aren't even born yet. 😂
@lightzpy80494 жыл бұрын
@@fouronetwo813 every president since 1900 "IMMA JUST SPEND SPEND SPEND!"
@thegamerwolf58244 жыл бұрын
@ihategooglespooks I mean if were still in debt with china after they released a plague and blamed us then there's a problem
@narms44254 жыл бұрын
Lml it's good though life carries on
@electricpizza57744 жыл бұрын
US military spending is roughly 3% of GDP, of which about half goes to the blue water navy. Considering that the US typically spent 6% to 8% (and at one point 12%) of its GDP on its military during the Cold War, the current 3% is small by comparison. At the Bretton-Woods conference following World War II, the USA advocated freedom of trade and freedom of the seas as a replacement for the old pre-WW2 colonial system. Dozens of nations have since signed on to this system. To this day, one of the major roles of the US Navy is to patrol the world's oceans in order to ensure freedom of the seas. I recommend watching the video "How the New World Order was made" by CaspianReport for more details.
@AdamosDad4 жыл бұрын
The US Navy is also the second largest airforce in the world after the US Airforce.
@Vasil-of2ki4 жыл бұрын
AdamosDad wouldn’t that actually be the US Army in 2nd place and US Navy in 3rd place?
@dominickefrim30884 жыл бұрын
😆
@motoman22atgmail4 жыл бұрын
Vasil 6907 The USAF is in fact the world's largest Air Force. The USN is in fact the world's second largest Air Force.
@freedomliberty89614 жыл бұрын
Vasil 6907 count by fixed wing aircraft not by rotary wing
@Vasil-of2ki4 жыл бұрын
@@freedomliberty8961 gotcha
@joshuapowell50474 жыл бұрын
"Are you guys paying for this?" Yep "You guys must be rich!" Nope, but yep.
@origamiscienceguy665811 ай бұрын
"You guys must be rich." "No, all our money goes towards aircraft carriers.
@DOOM62874 жыл бұрын
the US airforce is the strongest airforce in the world, the second strongest is the US navy. correction: second strongest air power is the US Army, third strongest is the US Navy.
@toomanyaccounts4 жыл бұрын
and don't forget the Marine Corps also has more aircraft then most countries.
@livingonadollar28824 жыл бұрын
Russia in the 80's found out the hard way ..Having the most.. Cost the most.... It's like life Insurance Its only good if your dead Having the the most is the worse thing to have if you have no need for it
@OpRaven-624 жыл бұрын
@@livingonadollar2882, well, it's a good thing that the US needs them!
@danyal61814 жыл бұрын
Who has the best navy
@domusdebellum30424 жыл бұрын
@@toomanyaccounts the marines are under the department of the navy. so they are counted under navy planes. that is why the US Navy is the single most powerful fighting force in the world.
@samurich04 жыл бұрын
“They probably have a McDonalds down there knowing America.” I like the way you think, soldier.
@svenson_61424 жыл бұрын
No McDonald’s but there’s a Starbucks
@justnoob81414 жыл бұрын
Svenson_ Worst. Trade-off. Ever.
@xOhSo4 жыл бұрын
@@AzaiReacts not stereotyping if its true lmfao
@xOhSo4 жыл бұрын
@@AzaiReacts im American dude
@xOhSo4 жыл бұрын
@@AzaiReacts im not political, and im definitely not a libtard, you done assuming?
@BLT0014 жыл бұрын
Funniest line: "And Italy has two - alright, that's weird."
@James-wb1uy4 жыл бұрын
🤣😂🤣😂🇺🇸😂
@RoastLambShanks4 жыл бұрын
prob second-hand junk or leftover from WWI
@benlex56724 жыл бұрын
@@RoastLambShanks Not true. CV doesn't exist during WWI, not to mention that Italy never had CV prior to 2001. Both of them are STOVL carriers with similar capability to Hornet class and America class respectively, which means carrying less than 30 planes in total. Edit: Italy still has one of the most advanced navy today (with the others being Japan, Britain, and France), with US ordering Italian frigates just this year when they realized they can't build proper frigates for ASW after the 2007 exercise when a Swedish submarine sank (not physically) USS Ronald Regan without being detected.
@uncbadguy4 жыл бұрын
@@benlex5672 I was on CVA-19. She took a kamikaze hit at Okinawa.
@484mac4 жыл бұрын
It really shouldn’t be a surprise. The Italians have been a naval power since roman times.
@kjpshowe1902 Жыл бұрын
I love going through your older videos. I am a Navy nuke firmly serving onboard US aircraft carriers And submarines. I appreciate your fascination with this… And I appreciate being one of your supporters. You are truly the type of person I love to see as an ally of our NATO forces. You’re a patriot for your country and that means a lot to the rest of us. Slav Ukraini, tsoraviche
@Johng9154 жыл бұрын
"Crusing in the south China Sea is a very dangerous place to be" ... For everyone else
@AntavasSpeaks4 жыл бұрын
That is part of the reason we cruise there. China is repeatedly trying to claim international waters as their sovereign territory. By cruising there, the U.S. shows that China is unable or unwilling to defend those waters, and therefore cannot claim ownership of them under international law. We are there specifically to prevent China from expanding.
@ZekeNova4 жыл бұрын
@Huawei is a criminal organization. Largest military in the world? What? Number of soldiers? Those numbers can be brought down pretty quickly. Full blown bald eagles.
@rakheem3514 жыл бұрын
@@argr are you trying to say that the USA would loose a war with China cause I don’t see that happening any time soon
@rakheem3514 жыл бұрын
@@argr ok I get what you are saying but for 1 we didn’t loose to Vietnam
@rakheem3514 жыл бұрын
@Huawei is a criminal organization. lol I’m arguing with him on another comment
@iggsta3o54 жыл бұрын
Artur Rehi: China must be very angry at that Me: ..... Good
@michaeljorgensen7904 жыл бұрын
The disputed islands in the South China Sea did not belong to China. They were historically shared by fishermen from Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines. They were then taken by China...some at gunpoint. It's not that China should be angry...it should be the rest of the world that should be angry that China took them. And Obama let it happen. But now the island taking has halted...until we get the next Democrat president...then the entire Philippines will probably fall to China.
@goldenrepublic68484 жыл бұрын
Michael Jorgensen don’t you know China has “historical claims” to everything. I’m being sarcastic I feel I had to say that because I think someone will think I’m serious.
@bobh94924 жыл бұрын
@@goldenrepublic6848 I claim the great wall of China as my own, i heard my uncles cousins brothers niece had visited there and put a foot on the wall.... so its mine. And my claim is as legitimate as China's on the South China Sea islands.
@thynysan4 жыл бұрын
@@michaeljorgensen790 Trump is still allowing it to happen. The US government was never going to do anything about it especially when comes to a technically capable adversary like China or Russia. So get it right.
@ethanverdersa25204 жыл бұрын
@@michaeljorgensen790 I completely agree with you. Also try to be a little less transparent about your political views on KZbin
@sanitarycockroach90384 жыл бұрын
A fair fight is an uncertain one. Rule #1 of warfare: Unless unavoidable, never join a fight you aren't certain of winning.
@rylian214 жыл бұрын
An old saying: If you're in a fair fight, you're doing it wrong.
@victorwaddell65304 жыл бұрын
Clint Smith of Thunder Ranch " If you find yourself in a fair fight your tactics suck " .
@markborkowski24894 жыл бұрын
Man only if Japan know that in 1941
@maxredman10154 жыл бұрын
@@markborkowski2489 Their idea of a fair fight. Attack while the other country doesn't know they are at war with you. Then after you finish attacking, declare war.
@markborkowski24894 жыл бұрын
Max Redman idk if you ever done your hw or watched a documentary on the Pearl harbor attack, but in class and through a documentary we were told that a Japanese admiral told top Japanese military people to call off the attack if we can not go through Hawaii and attack the heart of the U.S.
@hesselkessell52184 жыл бұрын
"1 torpedo can take it down" *Laughs in Enterprise*
@pro.racist.3 жыл бұрын
Hehe
@OfficialJoeKingOne3 жыл бұрын
Maybe a Nuclear Torpedo. Otherwise, close a few hatches and carry on.
@andrewschmidt94023 жыл бұрын
The military tried to sink a carrier to see if they could, they couldn't.
@dadauto14 жыл бұрын
I love Artur's childlike exuberance. If only all Americans could be like him.
@terrylandess60724 жыл бұрын
As a 61 year old ex-navy guy, I find this video simply charming. I feel no need to educate or correct him on anything - just seeing his interest and conclusions are entertaining.
@frankcolumbo96154 жыл бұрын
Estonia military 🇪🇪 has no sideburn length regulations ? Whom does he think he is.......Admiral Zumwalt ?
@lairdriver4 жыл бұрын
@@frankcolumbo9615 probably not on active duty
@Joe-rx7ht4 жыл бұрын
Yeah. It’s called the 1980’s, when we had G.I.Joe cartoons and Americans loved their country. 🇺🇸 Not so much now, thanks to our marxist eduction system.
@wooflessdelta4 жыл бұрын
I had to search on what made America great as soon as I came to this country since they never taught it, just history and how to hate math. Half the time it wasn't anything patriotic, other than your feelings matter. Hit me like a brick when I realized what being an american meant at least for me. Freedom, Liberty, and the right to say how much you hate your country without being shot and that's about it. The fact you can do things and say things without limitation compared to other countries is astounding and I guess people just forgot it over the years and replaced it with an international oppressive police and burgers.
@thejanitor32634 жыл бұрын
"How much do you pay for your military?" USA: yes
@iexist31534 жыл бұрын
How many Carriers do you want? USA: *yes*
@ipant10564 жыл бұрын
Yea: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
@planetsingatorade3 жыл бұрын
A lot of Americans (including me) are critical of how much money goes to this type of thing when our education and healthcare could really use some fat stacks.
@jacket54563 жыл бұрын
@@planetsingatorade Big gun that goes boom > Being able to afford the MRI imaging that finds your cancerous tumor
@riana53143 жыл бұрын
:D
@tarn11354 жыл бұрын
We will have 12 carriers soon and that’s not counting the Marine’s escort carriers. As for the comment that a carrier would go down easy without the escort fleet, that’s not accurate the modern super carriers are extremely difficult to sink. It has defenses that are difficult to overcome. The reason we have 11 carriers is because one or more are being refurbished and upgraded and while the others are deployed also we have a rule that we must be able to fight on two fronts and win this goes back to ww2 when we were fighting in Europe and the pacific. Neat tidbit for you the number you see on the ship like on the USS Gerold Ford ship number is CVN-78 that basically means we’ve built 78 carriers.
@hllboi8174 жыл бұрын
Which is why theres at least 1 on station in the indian ocean/persian gulf, atlantic and pacific
@ex-navyspook4 жыл бұрын
To say nothing of our damage control, which is constantly being hammered home and trained on at home and at sea. USN CTT 11yrs.
@Lilwigglzz6774 жыл бұрын
Facts
@kappsa53654 жыл бұрын
actually we have built 78 Fleet carriers we have built hundreds of escort and helicopter carriers
@noneofyourbusiness94894 жыл бұрын
Even more than that. 78 fleet carriers. Many more smaller ones.
@tyronebr5494 жыл бұрын
Sink one air craft carrier, receive the FULL retribution of the USA
@Dr_Duck694 жыл бұрын
Plus NATO
@robotsquirreI4 жыл бұрын
You mean try to sink
@Dr_Duck694 жыл бұрын
@@robotsquirreI No, the only time the US carrier got sunk during a navy exercise was from Sweden. Its possible to sink a carrier, but HIGHLY unlikely.
@robotsquirreI4 жыл бұрын
@@Dr_Duck69 hence "try"
@G_Diddler3 жыл бұрын
Sweden sunk ur carrier :/
@stenbak884 жыл бұрын
This video makes me so proud to be an American, I love Estonia by the way. The South China Sea is not chinese territory it’s that simple
@crinixx4 жыл бұрын
He asked if we are paying for this and as an American I yelled “YES ACTUALLY” to my screen
@aquablue6664 жыл бұрын
Same
@Rhov94 жыл бұрын
When he said “you must be rich” I’m like “HAHAHAHAHA” 😂 no no, we just pump most of our money into the military. Which, we should be putting more of that into education. And we have a LARGE population.
@cptomes4 жыл бұрын
same
@godemperortrump69324 жыл бұрын
@@Rhov9 no we are hella rich
@darkshadow33554 жыл бұрын
@@godemperortrump6932 If we are so rich, why do we have so much debt?
@SpartanRamen4 жыл бұрын
This is why I laughed so hard when China announced their aircraft carrier and all of the news here stateside were acting as if it was a big achievement and a threat to the US.
@stephenvargas58064 жыл бұрын
Our Media loves China, they’ve been hyping them up for decades.
@shyryTsr2k4 жыл бұрын
@@stephenvargas5806 sadly, yes. They sure to like licking China's balls for some reason and some even want the US to BE LIKE China which is utter BS
@ericreinhart97954 жыл бұрын
Their aircraft carrier run on Diesel, it can't operate for long and they are expensive at hell. While the US run on nuclear power and can operate for a long time.
@stephenmanuel11204 жыл бұрын
I posted this to Arthur, the US Navy has over 75 years of experience in carrier operations, it's one thing to have a Carrier, but it's a totally different world to know how to operate a carrier efficiently....
@operator04 жыл бұрын
Their first carrier is one they bought off the Ukrainians, which inherited it from the USSR when it broke up. Their future designs are based off that old relic. It's no threat to the US Navy, even if they build 20 of them. Their subs though....
@soldierstull4 жыл бұрын
Artur, this is the first video I watched from you. I love seeing the reaction to someone with a different perspective of our military. I served in Iraq from 06-08 and worked with Estonian soldiers that were attached to our unit, HHT 1-7 CAV, 1BCT, 1CD. You guys are the best!!
@andreataccone25644 жыл бұрын
Italy having 2 Aircraft Carriers is understandable: we are a country surrounded by water, with all the recent battles happening south/south-east of us just across the Mediterranean Sea.
@Data-lb6si4 жыл бұрын
It's reasonable to want a strong naval presence for sure. We're mostly just impressed that a small nation like Italy has invested enough to have that strong of a naval presence. I mean, not only are your carriers more modern, but you have as many as Russia and China combined. Seriously surprising.
@HKfortyseven4 жыл бұрын
Well that and you guys used to be Rome.
@anoncrazynonevilgooddecent76314 жыл бұрын
@Αθηναίος Οπλίτης I ate 9 mozzarella cheese sticks with marinara sauce, 1 small blueberry pie and a burger for the whole day n i feel full rn
@greenman80604 жыл бұрын
@Hotel Yamato 110 aircraft carriers in ww2? No...
@michaeljorgensen7904 жыл бұрын
@Hotel Yamato 110 Aircraft carriers in WW2? Only CV2 to CV33 could have served in that era. That's 32 fleet aircraft carriers at most. I think you counted escort carriers and light CVL carriers. Some of those were flat tops built on civilian vessels. I guess at half the length and 1/3 the tonnage it depends on how small you can go to still call it an aircraft carrier.
@Dingusdoofus4 жыл бұрын
Also, America has 9 more smaller carriers (that are bigger than some country’s biggest carriers) that can carry up to 30 F-35’s.
@Hairysteed4 жыл бұрын
Well... 30 if they get rid of all the helicopters and landing craft and turn it into an all out STOVL carrier instead of an amphibious assault ship.
@Gbrown03414 жыл бұрын
LHD class carriers
@Dingusdoofus4 жыл бұрын
The Wasp Class and America Class can carry and launch F-35s if they want to. Their aircraft loadout depends on their mission, just like the bigger carriers who also have different aircraft loadouts.
@leytone.48094 жыл бұрын
Also add retired ships.
@BarbaricMWL4 жыл бұрын
@@Dingusdoofus Not entirely true. Yes, the smaller carriers air wing can and do change with the mission, but no, the larger carrier's air wing do not change as the larger carriers air wing is already equipped to do whatever the mission may call for.
@lieutenantflyboy4 жыл бұрын
Whenever a crisis breaks out, the first question the military asks is “where is the nearest carrier?”.
@AlechiaTheWitch4 жыл бұрын
True. So darn true
@person81683 жыл бұрын
‘Murica
@Plastikdoom2 жыл бұрын
The second, where’s the nearest MEU, being half the firepower and the dirge of our enemies, my younger brothers, takers and destroyers of land and forces.
@Mewofastora4 жыл бұрын
If I had a nickel for every Italian aircraft carrier I'd have two nickels, which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice.
@Plastikdoom2 жыл бұрын
Ahaha, true, but they got more functional than anyone else, except us, which is funnier and even more weird.
@PlanetEarth31412 жыл бұрын
Blake, the best thing about Italian aircraft carriers is they are usually in port, have few training days, host a Pizza Hut franchise and give conjugal visits to sailors. Not really a wartime navy. A pelican with a hand grenade is more deadly.
@briangilbert90772 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣
@briangilbert90772 жыл бұрын
@@PlanetEarth3141 never, under any circumstances, ever underestimate the spitefulness of a pelican Damn kamikaze torpedo dive bombing shit 💩 dropping bastards 🤬🤬🤬 😂🤣😂🤣
@Mrbfgray2 жыл бұрын
Raves about who's paying for it...yeah MY income taxes, some of it should come at the fuel pump instead as we defend the globes oil shipping lanes.
@caleblarzelere99494 жыл бұрын
Artur: "wheres the McDonalds its America I know it has one". Me: i have never been so offended by something i 100% agree with.
@pauljs754 жыл бұрын
There isn't one on the ship, but the food is still good. However if stationed at a home port in Norfolk, then the McDonald's is a short walk across from pier 12.
@connorcronin78034 жыл бұрын
Mine had a Starbucks on it manned by crew
@6Ozomatli4 жыл бұрын
more likely it would be a Burger King, anyway...
@fentishxt44924 жыл бұрын
@@connorcronin7803 I was jus about to talk about it, what would you get from the starbucks like is it really jus the same as on the ground
@sbritton13134 жыл бұрын
@@connorcronin7803 I was wondering if anyone was going to point that out...
@DyIvn4 жыл бұрын
The US has a Patreon, that’s why we have 11 damn Carriers.
@Duke00x4 жыл бұрын
I think we have 12 now. I am pey sure the USS JOHN F. KENNEDY makes 12 because we haven't yet retired any of the other 11.
@PWJ43214 жыл бұрын
12*
@stonks66164 жыл бұрын
Correction, 13, the 13th was just announced
@jonathanryan99464 жыл бұрын
Dont forget the 9 amphibious assault carriers America has (soon to be 10). 8 of these are old generation, with 1 new gen (with 10 more new gen scheduled to replace the older 8). These carriers can have the "hover" or v/stol aircraft or lots of attack helicopters or troop carrying helicopters. As mentioned above currently there are 11 commissioned Super Aircraft carriers with a 12 that is built but undergoing sea triales. The 12 is scheduled to replace the Nimitz, but the Ford Class still has some kinks so I expect that the Nimitz wont go away for years. Plus there is debate about going back to 12 carriers in service instead of the current 11, this way it's easier to do schedule and unscheduled maintenance without taking too many carriers offline. Technically America also has 5 aircraft carriers that are museums, and 2 more that are preserved that could become museums. So if things get real bad these could be brought back... though its unlikely as they're older and not as capable. And no, a single torpedoe couldn't destroy a modern Aircraft carrier. The US has purposefully tried to sink old carriers to test out their durability... it took countless hit and stayed afloat. They had to send a demolition team aboard to scuttle it. Yeah, a torpedoe would definitely incapacitate a carrier but they're designed to be quickly battle repaired then sail home to get fully fixed.
@Bryan-cs9to4 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanryan9946 Yep they have the F-35B from USMC
@rakuteno3 жыл бұрын
This whole channel is an advertisement of our country and I am absolutely loving it.
@Dagobah3594 жыл бұрын
Actually, in the US we have North Koreans living here as well (defectors).
@kl69024 жыл бұрын
Exactly, I know one and she’s amazing 👍🏼 Are there actually any countries not represented in the US?
@johnwhodat81354 жыл бұрын
200 north Korean defectors.
@Mafia-gh2ut4 жыл бұрын
OCFam I’ve never seen a Taiwanese person. But most Asians look alike to Americans so I wouldn’t really know lol
@joe184254 жыл бұрын
America truely is that shining beacon. Then you get there and start to miss war torn somalia, thinking to yourself, "if i hear that word again am gonna try swimmin back" then somebody says trump. Next thing you know your on a bus to the nearest coastal town with your trunks.
@Karen-pk3uv4 жыл бұрын
@@Mafia-gh2ut I have. I think a lot of Asian immigrants and Asian-Americans have more of less stayed close to larger coastal cities. I'm going to go with the easy bet and say one of the "newer/younger " countries in Africa. There have been a couple civil wars within the last 50-ish years, and civil wars typically result in at least one new country.
@henryschoon78164 жыл бұрын
I love how he takes the time to honor all his patrons and stuff during the video, thats really nice
@marisacantu18174 жыл бұрын
These vids make me feel patriotic for Estonia, and I live in Texas!
@t74guard784 жыл бұрын
Hope that isn't a problem for you. Sounds all good to me. We are all people. I am sure Estonia wouldn't mind having another patriot. Go girl !!!!!!!!!!
@floo14654 жыл бұрын
i’m literally the exact same way, meaning, i also live in texas
@kissthesky99694 жыл бұрын
Texas
@Mr.Unknown1414 жыл бұрын
Most American Estonian I think I've ever seen
@Stonerman1354 жыл бұрын
4:00 "One torpedo can take it out." No it can't. In 2005 the U.S. did test on an older aircraft carrier (USS America) to see how much abuse they could take before sinking so they could use that information is designing future aircraft carriers. The ship withstood four weeks of constant attack and was still floating before they sent a demolition team in to finally sink it.
@Bad_Wolf_Media4 жыл бұрын
From a technical point of view, this is both correct and wrong. An aircraft carrier - like the America, in the example you cited - can take a TON of abuse and stay afloat. But being afloat doesn't mean much. A single torpedo could, in fact, take a carrier off the board if it damages the screws. If a carrier can't make enough speed, they can't launch aircraft. (You have to have air moving over the deck for lift on the wings, even with a catapult). Usually that means the carrier turns into the wind and brings speed up to around 30 knots to commence flight operations. If you damage to screws to the point where she can still move, but not fast enough to launch aircraft, then you have, in fact, "taken out" an aircraft carrier, even if she's still afloat.
@Tarv14 жыл бұрын
@@Bad_Wolf_Media I guess he meant full kill as opposed to technical kill like you mentioned
@briand.16944 жыл бұрын
Exactly! So many people think everything is like a video game. It took multiple torpedo's to sink the USS America which is smaller than a modern day carrier. Once a submarine fires a torpedo, it is likely that it's position will be compromised and thus attacked and sunk by a nearby US submarine or surface ship.
@refinederror4 жыл бұрын
Easier to repair a floating carrier then it is to repair one at the bottom of the ocean
@hawaiivolcanosquad33224 жыл бұрын
If the USA were to park a carrier 1000 yards of Iranian coast and told Iran to go ahead & try to sink it, they couldn't....
@waynedowney76164 жыл бұрын
Yeah bud. Former US Navy submariner here. Nuclear Reactor Operator. I was attached to the Teddy Roosevelt battlegroup in 2001/2002 for our Med run. I never wanted to be on a carrier, too many people. Roughly 130 guys on a Fast attack sub. I knew my captain, and he knew me. Carriers are also bomb magnets. We played rabbit boat with our battle group all the time during exercises, and they never detected us unless we let them (switching pumps to fast speed and banging hull with wrenches). If we wanted to sink them, nothing was going to stop us. The surface guys called us "Bubbleheads," and we called them "Targets" or Skimmers. The carriers are still very cool. Each one is the 6th largest air force in the world, are the key to US force projection abroad, and are the basis of our superpower status. It's cool to see our NATO allies recognizing just how impressive our Navy is. That deterrent is absolutely crucial for global security. I'm glad we have this stuff, but also glad to have lots of good NATO allies. Awesome to have you on our side.
@raytravis54 жыл бұрын
Former US Navy Helo Combat SAR & ASW Operator - "they never detected us unless we let them" LOL! Dude, I could tell when your captain took a dump by the sound of the toilet. Two dipping helos and a sub is toast. Don't get me started on acoustics. JK bro, it was always fun playing hide and seek with you guys.
@waynedowney76164 жыл бұрын
@@raytravis5 Dipping helos are probably the best chance you guys had of detecting us, but we'd just hang out under the thermocline layer. We knew the heads were actually the thing that could give us away the most, so we tied the toilet seats up (the piping is a direct sound short to the hull). I just remember the Sonar Tech from the Ramage telling me in La Madd about how his CO ripped his ass for not being able to detect us and then we "sunk" the TR. And then later to make it fair we were ordered to make sound transients so they could find us, so the ERLL watch was picking up and dropping a bilge access hatch over and over again and I was banging on the aft escape trunk with a wrench.
@MrFlatage4 жыл бұрын
Fake news and no Proof of Service. JTFEX/TMDI99. Detected and sank the entire fleet, lmao!
@locash81224 жыл бұрын
This dude is more American than most actual Americans these days.
@friendlyak47fish64 жыл бұрын
Hes more fascinated in the military than actual military enthusiasts lol.
@illogicalporcupine4 жыл бұрын
It's always fun when people thinking "Wanting change and fighting for what you believe in" equals "brainwashed into hating the country". Sounds like fascist talk. The US isn't just for YOU.
@mohammedsarker57564 жыл бұрын
yes dude... because all there is to America is guns
@twright38024 жыл бұрын
Not sure liking a weapon constitutes being " American"....
@StevenSmith688284 жыл бұрын
@Jason Forbes they don't leave because they are living paycheck by paycheck and their families are stationed there. It also not bad enough to were people are in danger like in 3rd world countries. Probably a rhetorical question but that's the answer.
@annoyingtroll77454 жыл бұрын
“Italy has two that’s weird” best quote ever WoW ThAnKs GuYs I DiDnT ExEpEcT aLl ThE LiKeS jk I don’t really care
@ryanbroguy4 жыл бұрын
If youtube had a save comment button this would be the only one I save.
@Blehstor4 жыл бұрын
@@ryanbroguy wow, are u serious?
@ryanbroguy4 жыл бұрын
@@Blehstor probably
@Blehstor4 жыл бұрын
@@ryanbroguy why is your hate against italy so strong lol
@BrandoDrum4 жыл бұрын
Weird only until you realize Italy has roughly the same GDP as all of Russia even though it's about half the population. Its surrounded by water while russia is basically land locked other than its artic north and sparsely populated east.
@MayDayMei984 жыл бұрын
Even given that we have 11 aircraft carriers, the US navy is still considering upping its total ship-count from the mid 300s to 500.
@kevincrosby17604 жыл бұрын
Like any collection of mechanical systems, things break. There is a big difference between "existing" and "mission capable". At any given time there are ships in port for repairs, maintenance, upgrades, crew training, etc.
@cavlizzy4 жыл бұрын
@@kevincrosby1760 Yep, Maintenance can take anywhere from 6-18 months depending on how long it has been deployed. Which is why we have so many in rotation.
@kevincrosby17604 жыл бұрын
@@cavlizzy Exactly. Most folks don't realize exactly how old some of our ships actually are. The older they get, the more maintenance issues that they have. I was on the USS Kansas City (AOR-3) from '87-90. Her first deployment was to Vietnam...
@cavlizzy4 жыл бұрын
@@kevincrosby1760 Oh wow! I assume they can be updated technically to some degree as time passes?? (these ships are so dang expensive) Surely our oldest ships are at least "even" with Russia/China? And ours do get a regular important maintenance! Also, Thank you for your service!!
@cavlizzy4 жыл бұрын
@@kevincrosby1760 2) You certainly know a ton more than I do! I am a huge WWII buff. I lived in Belgium for several years & visited all the D-day beaches, etc..
@harrisonhamer42474 жыл бұрын
“You don’t have North Koreans” Americans: *laughs in melting pot*
@maxdamage84184 жыл бұрын
Actually, I lived near a place where they helped 2 NK escapees. They set them up with living and a job.
@harrisonhamer42474 жыл бұрын
Heyy that’s pretty neat
@zekedia22234 жыл бұрын
There aren’t that many, but there are some
@markwalker34994 жыл бұрын
Probably as many as we have Estonians. Do you know 1% of Australia's population lives in the states?
@harrisonhamer42474 жыл бұрын
Mark Walker woah
@KillerSniper554 жыл бұрын
Russia doesn’t really have one anymore. A crane fell through its deck and then caught on fire during repairs. They are t even repairing it agin because of how expensive it would be.
@TedMan554 жыл бұрын
for some reason that’s just funny
@bumface83504 жыл бұрын
“a crane fell thought the deck”
@Longshot4414 жыл бұрын
They just slapped some flex glue on it and it was okay.
@dennisdoherty11334 жыл бұрын
The last time the Russian aircraft carrier was put to sea it had to be tugged around. No wonder they are working on super sonic missiles, their navy is Дерьмо
@clone91594 жыл бұрын
Ya, but have you seen the Torpedoes on Russian and Syrian destroyers!
@MrMahad1054 жыл бұрын
We need more Estonian youtubers. Hopefully they're as dope as this channel.
@karolasiinmaa64164 жыл бұрын
I am an Estonian youtuber btw, but im not that good
@doctorchaotic34154 жыл бұрын
@@karolasiinmaa6416 you can,just believe and you can do it
@blazingempire75154 жыл бұрын
@@karolasiinmaa6416 belive in your self im sure you are better than you say you are
@abhiv.f.16284 жыл бұрын
@@karolasiinmaa6416 you are the patron right??
@badguy14814 жыл бұрын
666 - Me thinks you're a youtuber...from Beijing?
@flooringguy41904 жыл бұрын
Every time some kid says "impossible ". We say "hold my beer".
@Peeedizzzle224 жыл бұрын
Idea for next video: America's Ohio-Class Submarines.
@philleonard19854 жыл бұрын
Or the Virginia class SSN
@fightline47414 жыл бұрын
I vote for Ohio class
@nemesis11fp204 жыл бұрын
Los Angeles 688 class would be good too. Fast attack sub hunter.
@gotdayum68014 жыл бұрын
Yes
@gotdayum68014 жыл бұрын
Ohio class
@armymenstopmotion84404 жыл бұрын
If a US carrier was sunk, we would respond to that like a country nuked a city in the USA
@maryjoygelizon42684 жыл бұрын
All ships on the us navy would attack whoever sunk that ship
@Sherrodja4 жыл бұрын
Yup
@zacharyrollick61694 жыл бұрын
You hear that, SWEDEN!?
@ClingyCrab4 жыл бұрын
Well, all of our carriers ARE nuclear, so it’s kinda like a nuke, but instead it’s just a Chernobyl in the middle of the ocean.
@baddog7114 жыл бұрын
@@ClingyCrab You don't know shit, US carriers won't 'melt' down.
@devinhart24184 жыл бұрын
HAHAHA “ who’s paying for this” the good ol American taxpayers my friend
@geraldmcleary19414 жыл бұрын
Damn right we are lol
@The_Ministry4 жыл бұрын
Damn right
@devinhart24184 жыл бұрын
Healthcare? The America government: No Infrastructure? The America government: No UBI? The America government: No Portable floating death machines? The America government: $700 Billion dollars
@BillyMNeitz4 жыл бұрын
@@devinhart2418 you might want to do a little more googling because military spending is only 15% to 20% of the entire federal budget.
@kroberts88664 жыл бұрын
It's actually a mere 4% for sustaining the force. The rest is 'defense related' areas like transportation and energy infrastructure not under the DOD.
@trstmeimadctr4 жыл бұрын
When building the US's newer aircraft carriers, the set designers for Star Trek the Next Generation were actually consulted, because the Navy recognized that the bridge design of the Enterprise from that show was laid out in a way that had a number of desirable features, some of which had never been integrated into real US ships.
@aidenmcknight28844 жыл бұрын
A few years ago, we had an obsolete carrier that was being retired, so, as a test, we attempted to sink it by firing a bunch of missiles and artillery at it. The carrier, though, did not sink until a crew of engineers boarded it and detonated the bull with explosives. That carried was obsolete and not defending itself I wonder what it would take to sink a newer one...?
@armadillotoe4 жыл бұрын
Nukes?
@Thorgon-Cross4 жыл бұрын
@@armadillotoe Unlikely. US put a WWII carrier near our Fusion bomb test and the carrier lost the top deck but was other wise unharmed. Keep in mind Fusion bombs are more powerful then Nukes. On the other hand the Carrier was not right at the bomb site.
@admiralshadowofasunderedst30684 жыл бұрын
@@Thorgon-Cross fusion bombs are nukes they just go through a different process to go super critical
@echogames12824 жыл бұрын
Nuke is a general term, there are about 3000 different types of 'nukes'
@Thorgon-Cross4 жыл бұрын
@@admiralshadowofasunderedst3068 Yep. H-bomb used Fusion "nukes" use Fission, both are bombs that rely on a process in the nucleus of the atoms.
@iRoamYouTube4 жыл бұрын
USA: 11 expensive carriers 🚢 Artur: who's paying for them? US taxpayers: 😐 edit: comment section: 😶😡😯
@natskivna4 жыл бұрын
To all countries receiving security from the american taxpayer. You're welcome.
@Aloha10414 жыл бұрын
USA tax payers meaning, every US citizen
@friendlyauntjemmima98484 жыл бұрын
Aloha not every have you heard of the church
@eydamone4 жыл бұрын
@@Aloha1041 every us citizen making over 10,000*
@timmholl92384 жыл бұрын
Freedom isn't free.
@concept56314 жыл бұрын
"Who's paying for this?" American taxpayer: *helo*
@joedufour81883 жыл бұрын
US debt is almost $28 trillion and climbing faster than at anytime in our history. We are basically maxing out our credit cards then applying for more credit cards to make the payments on the one's we maxed out then applying for more to make the payments on the one's we are using to make the payments on, etc. There will be a point where the American dollar will collapse and the nation will swiftly follow after that. Our economy is completely unsustainable and propped up only by enormous and ever growing amounts of debt. Total American debt( federal, state, local, and private) is over $82 trillion. There isn't even that much money in circulation in the entire world in all currencies.
@kapfiji7313 жыл бұрын
@@joedufour8188 The US dollar is military protected, its value isn’t collapsing anytime soon buddy.
@joedufour81883 жыл бұрын
@@kapfiji731 That is absolutely false and doesn't even make sense. We have a central banking system and our money is issued and owned by the Federal Reserve which is not a government entity. It is as federal as Federal Express.
@kapfiji7313 жыл бұрын
@@joedufour8188 allahu_adamsmith · 2y The US dollar is a fiat currency. It is not tied to gold or silver or anything else, it only has value because the US says it has value, and because of the strength of the US economy, powerful investors take the US's word to be good. Thus the US dollar is considered to be a safer investment than some other currencies. The US economy depends on the global economy (as do most major economies). Global trade and shipping are protected by the strength of the militaries of the US and its allies, but mainly by the US. Thus, the US dollar is backed by the US military.
@joedufour81883 жыл бұрын
@@kapfiji731 The value is backed by faith. When that faith goes, so does the dollar. As our debt rises to levels we cannot possibly come back from, it will happen sooner rather than later. Once again, the dollar is not backed by the military in any way, shape, or form.
@earldonavon1104 жыл бұрын
Fun fact, ships are called she because they carry you in their "womb".
@OriginalGlorfindel4 жыл бұрын
Only the Bismarck was ever called a He. And He was a prototype for and entire fleet. If only.... (Note the difference between male and female tanks in early days of development...yes there were both genders!)
@sydneyharbour66163 жыл бұрын
I've always wondered that so, thank you
@justanunluckyirishmaninabl51783 жыл бұрын
@@OriginalGlorfindel Bismark gets mentioned Me: *PRIDE OF A NATION A BEAST MADE OF STEEL* *BISMARK IN MOTION -- KING OF THE OCEAN* *HE WAS MADE TO RULE THE WAVES ACROSS THE SEVEN SEAS*
“It’s unfair that the US has that many carriers” Who said that the US fights fair? We engage an enemy with overwhelming force. We fight to win, not to be gentlemanly towards our enemies.
@gdo35104 жыл бұрын
John Popham unfortunately we haven’t actually won a won since what? The Korean War? WW2? We need to get outta the ME and other wars we can’t win
@arkad63294 жыл бұрын
@@gdo3510 We haven't won a war because when we go war the media wants to come with. Then people see what a war entails, and they say "omg! I can't believe you are actually killing people!" Then restrictive R.O.E. gets put in place, and gets in the way of winning the war. It has nothing to do with who we are fighting, and everything to do with who is watching.
@t5grrr4 жыл бұрын
Dont fight fair, fight to win.
@Minotaur-ey2lg4 жыл бұрын
John Popham America is basically the pay to win of war, but hey, if you got it, use it. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.
@danyheatleyall-star36774 жыл бұрын
GDO we won in Iraq
@eduardemanuel14824 жыл бұрын
Russia has none the one they had caught fire and is uder repair. Sad/funny at the same time.
@toomanyaccounts4 жыл бұрын
china has had to cancel several of theirs.
@TeamMuchers4 жыл бұрын
Russia can't even service their own carrier, even when it is sailing. Buddy of mine said they had to help repair it once because they didn't know how.
@andrewbacon70424 жыл бұрын
It probably caught fire because it was diesel powered
@mlplarisanable4 жыл бұрын
China and Russia's strengths aren't in their navies but in their ground forces, just check how many tanks they have you'd be amazed.
@toomanyaccounts4 жыл бұрын
@@mlplarisanable most of those tanks are old and are falling apart due to lack of spare parts. remember how Iraq had one of the largest military forces on the planet yet crumbled within just a few days.
@blaneiobe85794 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite toys as a kid was a huge aircraft carrier, I launched so many fake missions off that bad boy
@cameronclarke64724 жыл бұрын
Same tho
@tarn11354 жыл бұрын
Had that GI:Joe toy did ya? I’m slightly jealous.
@mercerholt82994 жыл бұрын
Oh yes my dad got me one right before he got deployed on one.
@Messerschmitt_BF_109G_104 жыл бұрын
Lol, i had a huge FA-18 superhornet
@LIMA-tq4iz4 жыл бұрын
I got a model not a toy for a kid though.
@80sgamer764 жыл бұрын
I was in the US Navy - When we went underway or (deployed) for the 9 months out to sea we only needed to be supplied once every 3 months the supply ship would go to shore and get supplies and then go back to sea and supply the carrier, the carrier never has to go to shore while deployed. As for how tough the carrier is it can take a direct hit to the hull of the ship and still float it has compartments within the ship that can close off to keep afloat.
@thekingsman30084 жыл бұрын
“They have elevators for planes on a ship!” Best line ever
@AZP-im7gk4 жыл бұрын
John Signs that’s pretty weird cause I don’t remember asking
@skrillaforilla96654 жыл бұрын
@@AZP-im7gk no need to now
@Felix-xw6du4 жыл бұрын
Skrilla Forilla Mind if I use this line?
@jmitterii24 жыл бұрын
He can't pretend he has never watched Top Gun. Russia even came out with their own copycat as they loved the movie so much.
@seanlanders41804 жыл бұрын
"If the AC-130 is like a flying fortress then the aircraft carrier must be like the floating fortress" I take it nobody has shown you the B-52 Stratofortress
@jmugurr9944 жыл бұрын
Or the actual B-17 Flying Fortress along with the B-29 Super Fortress.
@veryorangecone53794 жыл бұрын
"the us has 11?!" yeah we like the 'go big or go home' way of thinking
@roberthudson19594 жыл бұрын
The USN had 12 carriers for a long time, but I think the current goal is 10. USS Gerald R. Ford is having major problems becoming battleworthy, which has prolonged the career of the oldest active carrier (Nimitz).
@josephpmans4 жыл бұрын
@@roberthudson1959 correct, there were many new innovative systems that were created for the Ford class, and it is taking much longer than expected to iron out the kinks, but they are also much more efficient overall with reduction in manpower by almost 1k compared with the Nimitz class while increasing their capabilities. The long development is also part of the reason why the US kept the Enterprise (CVN-65) running for so much longer than they had planned to. Also I would like to point out that the carriers dont have a top speed of 35 mph, they have an un-classified speed of 35+ mph, they can go much quicker, and the old Enterprise was the fastest ship on the planet.
@unigaming99214 жыл бұрын
lmao no, we have 22. Don't forget the 11 amphibious assault ships. They are in fact carriers similar in size to other nation's carrier.
@diabeticmonkey4 жыл бұрын
Robert Hudson I’m still wondering when its going to leave the shipyard. I’m getting sick of looking at it in the distance.
@blackleaf_yt4 жыл бұрын
Yes, the American go big or go home. Huge Navy, big population, big nukes, big Army, and definitely big Mac's
@1nonlysebb4 жыл бұрын
2:44 "Are u guys paying for this??' *EHEM EHEM...TAXES..EHEM EHEM*
@tazepat0014 жыл бұрын
I recently found out that we only had 11 carriers and My first thought was "thats it?!" 😂
@James-wb1uy4 жыл бұрын
🤣😂🤣😂
@johnlee12974 жыл бұрын
@@James-wb1uy We actually only have 9 available. The U.S.S. Ford is nowhere near combat capable and the USS George Washington still has about a year left to go in her mid-life refueling and major overhaul. Once she's deployable, the Stennis will go into the yard for its mid-life refueling and complex overhaul and will not be available for over 4 years. The Ford debacle has really handicapped the navy, we should have 10 available for deployment with 1 in the yard at any given time. We are thus down a carrier battle group from what we should have available at all times.
@tazepat0014 жыл бұрын
@Sufuurin Its still an impressive feat. However, the reason for my surprise is pretty much based on the amount of money that we spend on military each year. It just seems to me. A non military citizen that it seems like a low figure.
@kl69024 жыл бұрын
Yes!! I thought we had at LEAST 50...one per state 😂 I was like well shit, 11 ain’t enough 🤦🏻♀️
@jonathanh66604 жыл бұрын
11 super carriers, plus 9 more smaller assault carriers.
@p3kka2894 жыл бұрын
I’m italian why were you surprise when you saw italy have 2 carriers ? We need to defend our pizzas in some way. Btw I’m loving this “ reaction series “
@TeamMuchers4 жыл бұрын
Have your pizza delivered by helicopters xD
@p3kka2894 жыл бұрын
That’s the next step
4 жыл бұрын
Italy is a relatively small country to have two operational carriers, very impressive.
@shyryTsr2k4 жыл бұрын
@ it really is impressive! It may not be large in anyway or have many of the perks the US carriers have but having 2 as a small nation is very impressive even more than a large superpower such as Russia or China.
@DJC_20034 жыл бұрын
@@shyryTsr2k not to mention China and Russias ships are slag heaps...shit boxes if you will, I'm sure either of Italys carriers could face Russia and Chinas
@dennisweifenbach26474 жыл бұрын
The Russian "carrier" has a hard time floating, much less sailing anywhere. Right now it was severely damaged in dry dock. In the past when it could float it had to travel with a tug boat to take it back to port. It's about time military videos stop listing the Russia has a carrier
@4gerars5004 жыл бұрын
Lmao they need to stop spending money on nuclear weapons
@michrech4 жыл бұрын
Well, I mean, they technically *have a carrier*... The fact that it's severely damaged and has never done, well, anything properly doesn't stop them from having it... lol
@rundaneperu93344 жыл бұрын
Well, Chinese carrier don't looks much better :D
@pengo984 жыл бұрын
Don't forgot the US has had to come to its aid before as well lol
@Hypergen-4 жыл бұрын
It recently caught on fire too, for like the third time recently. It's literal only purpose is so that superiors have a place to put subordinates they don't like.
@rubidulce13 жыл бұрын
I’m getting my dual citizenship in USA and Mexico; I’m so proud of both countries; but although I’m created in Mexico, I am proud to be Made in America! Our military is arguably the most important part of our country... and although the government can piss us off in their decisions... we are always proud to support our troops and paying for their security and safety, is nothing compared to their sacrifice. Our troops fighting for our freedom is what makes us American. It definitely brings so much patriotism to my heart!
@corey5524 жыл бұрын
The reason the United States has such a large Navy is due to our position on the earth. We far away from Europe, Asia and Africa and in order to project strength and troops over that distance a large Navy is neccesary.
@bluefalconssuck58814 жыл бұрын
"Why do they have 11 Carriers?" Fukkaround and find out. 🤣🤣 Sinking a Carrier would be an open declaration of War... Not a Healthy decision.
@bonesawisready6844 жыл бұрын
I think he might have missed the part right at the end about in addition to the 11 carriers the US recently completed the 1st of 10 of a new class that are on the way.
@aredub18474 жыл бұрын
it would result in a nuclear response.
@Amani-zo8ic4 жыл бұрын
Are Dub I don’t think America would be the first to send. I know trump would be eager to but congress would be like nonono, they haven’t sent any yet and if we send first nobody will like us anymore.
@marshallcarhart5794 жыл бұрын
Also sinking the carrier would probably set off the reactor, and we all know what happens when a nuclear reactor breaks.
@Bamurai4 жыл бұрын
America literally is the embodiment of the term “Over Powered”, and damn do I love it.
@rosevillerod4 жыл бұрын
With all due respect Artur, one torpedo won’t do the job, nor will ten. Those ships are TOUGH
@svenson_61424 жыл бұрын
Theoretically you could disable it with a few maybe not sink it with 3 but could def disable movement
@djurgens764 жыл бұрын
Not mentioning the fact that getting a torpedo past an aircraft carrier defenses is nearly impossible
@king_undead7774 жыл бұрын
@@AzaiReacts i mean they did a war games in the pacific and a sub did multiple sweeps on the roosevelt enough to sink it twice
@king_undead7774 жыл бұрын
@@AzaiReacts and on top of that the roosevelt is almost insinkable
@deltahawk10014 жыл бұрын
@@king_undead777 They were fighting with their hands tied though. That is the point of exercises like that, to put the participants in absolute worst case scenarios. Their movements and tactics were restricted by the exercise rules.
@jacobremillard4 жыл бұрын
Artur: Who’s paying for this? US: Taxes, lots and lots of taxes.
@jacobremillard4 жыл бұрын
@@MidwestFarmToys Yeah, and it seems that our former president was reducing the debt, but he was voted out. I hope President-Elect Biden will continue to get us out of debt.
@jacobremillard4 жыл бұрын
@@MidwestFarmToys Precisely my point. If anyone else, especially leftist, would have done what he’s done, he would have been re-elected in a heartbeat. It’s just sad that people can’t see past the smoke and mirrors.
@Helena-cc8lv4 жыл бұрын
Hey how much aircrafts do you have? India: 1 Italy: 2 America: YES
@supers35124 жыл бұрын
Until Sweden shows up with a submarine xxx
@zyanidwarfare56344 жыл бұрын
I love his reaction to seeing how many carriers the U.S has
@V381-t3r4 жыл бұрын
Alex Gibbs hahaha you just salty, it that sub infiltrated the carrier strike group, nice bullshit
@frederickfaust73104 жыл бұрын
more in mothballs plus the amphibious assault ships
@sbritton13134 жыл бұрын
That seems to be a common US answer...
@deadmenace30674 жыл бұрын
"America has 11" *knocks over flag* perfect metaphor xD
@memeablememes76524 жыл бұрын
"Who's paying for this" US FED: Money printer goes Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrt
@Mike_2944 жыл бұрын
More like big gov turning to the American tax payers like, "hippity hopity, your monies my property"
@derrickhopkins38264 жыл бұрын
@@Mike_294 funniest shit I could relate to
@samoea194 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣
@Alffraido4 жыл бұрын
its not Money printers its everyones spare money
@yanktalkinsmack45904 жыл бұрын
When I say I choked laughing
@jordancoleman26934 жыл бұрын
During my active days in the marine corps I was able to spend time on multiple carriers. Including the USS America, Peleliu, greenbay. All of them were old and the peleliu was on its last deployment. The uss America was brand new and had a Starbucks on board.
@Darkage-sy8rj4 жыл бұрын
We technically have 19 Carrier's within the U.S. Military.
@greg62354 жыл бұрын
The U.S. has more aircraft carriers serving as museums than the rest of the world has operational.
@christopherbrooks36914 жыл бұрын
They aren't including the LHA types.
@milesturner79154 жыл бұрын
christopher brooks They should include LHDs and LHAs because they are essentially the same as the Italian carriers and british carriers, the only one I would say is truly similar would be the french one
@4gerars5004 жыл бұрын
and like 11 nuclear aircraft carriers
@Thelordshanguar4 жыл бұрын
"They probably have a McDonald's on there, knowing America." I'm howling 😂😂😂
@daemonhat4 жыл бұрын
i wouldn't be surprised if there was lol. they served it in Navy bootcamp at the San Diego RTC back in 1990. Disclaimer: I'm not a vet, was released on a medical discharge before i finished bootcamp.
@shyryTsr2k4 жыл бұрын
@@daemonhat aww im sorry you were released. Was it hard to deal with or did you accept it as fact?
@jonathanrangel70364 жыл бұрын
I’d expect more of a chick-fil-a
@operator04 жыл бұрын
I believe there's a mini Star Bucks on a few of them, or there used to be. I don't know if they still have them as it was just a trial.
@daemonhat4 жыл бұрын
@@shyryTsr2k i was disappointed, but i understood the situation. and all in all, things turned out pretty good.
@ryanstaggs18934 жыл бұрын
I love watching this dude react to our military😂😂
@emmetthudson36834 жыл бұрын
same
@TeamMuchers4 жыл бұрын
It is really fun to watch, he genuinely seems intrigued.
@shyryTsr2k4 жыл бұрын
Same, he's so enthusiastic about everything 😄
@bigfloppa63284 жыл бұрын
I want him to react to the B-52 bomber
@darren75504 жыл бұрын
Thank you for all your videos. They're really genuine and real, and that's what I like about them. Thanks!
@alldamagenocontrol93714 жыл бұрын
The US has even landed and launched C-130s off carriers in the 60s.
@gadyalpha20114 жыл бұрын
When you start a war in the us and they bring a whole airport on the sea
@whirledpeaz57584 жыл бұрын
Yes 4.5 Acres of Sovereign US territory.
@kennethhicks21134 жыл бұрын
Or 11 airports
@Bad_Wolf_Media4 жыл бұрын
@@kennethhicks2113 Nah....usually 2 or 3 are more than plenty to get the job done. The others have other places to be.
@kennethhicks21134 жыл бұрын
@@Bad_Wolf_Media Oh yea, I agree. And the logistics might not be possible... but it's a thought enemies should keep in mind. And would be an almost unfathomable intimidating display ; )
@Gythem4 жыл бұрын
@@kennethhicks2113 or, well actually 20! Don't forget the amphibious assault ships
@SeiferAlmasy87874 жыл бұрын
USA and Estonia are the bestest of friends. Finland: Hold my beer.
@Rhaspun4 жыл бұрын
Don't forget Australia.
@notlogical40164 жыл бұрын
Rhaspun hold out emus and vegimite
@leeofthevoid4 жыл бұрын
@Jennifer Clarkson sadly our PM is makeing us canadians the duff of the group
@crusader_wolf11044 жыл бұрын
Britain: Hold my tea
@robertgoss48424 жыл бұрын
How cool. Admiration from an ally soldier. Artur, you make me so proud to be an American. And proud to be an ally of Estonia!
@SpaceWolfPainter4 жыл бұрын
Deterrent. End of Story. It's the "Go Ahead, Make My Day" kinda thing.
@mycroft164 жыл бұрын
Speak softy, and carry a big stick. World... meet stick.
@victorwaddell65304 жыл бұрын
@@mycroft16 Teddy Roosevelt would be proud .
@kalbj89464 жыл бұрын
"Oh wow! Are you guys paying for this?! You must be rich!" America - *laughs in debt
@JediFarce4 жыл бұрын
We gave 175 million in military aid to Estonia
@joogface3863 жыл бұрын
Laughs in debt but who’s going to force us to pay it back lmfao
@AureliusLaurentius10993 жыл бұрын
@@joogface386 Most of the debt holders are American private investors and the Japanese
@joogface3863 жыл бұрын
@@AureliusLaurentius1099 haha, it was just a joke because the video is based on flexing the US military haha
@redjestertm1964 жыл бұрын
I love that you want to learn about America we need more people like this 🙏
@dirtfarmer74724 жыл бұрын
Americans need to learn more about America
@AubrieSloan3 жыл бұрын
Utah here! Love the video and the channel. Embarrassingly enough, you taught me something about my own Country. much appreciated!
@mauiskywalker8084 жыл бұрын
honestly I love this perspective. The cups, the attitude, the guy is just a smart dude. So glad to find his channel. I hope he is able to keep his money though and not get ripped by his countries government.
@laursieloise4 жыл бұрын
I love how he just casually has a gun in the background
@jacobfrancisco75804 жыл бұрын
Alex Gibbs liberals want to take guns away lmao
@laursieloise4 жыл бұрын
John Campbell it was a typo lol
@manaaddict50504 жыл бұрын
@ lol good one
@noellesilva51604 жыл бұрын
20:00 Japan like "Hey these neighbors are being way to loud if you could please tell them to quiet down a bit." U.S "We got you fam."
@brycewhalen85214 жыл бұрын
Ahh yeaa
@goldsmith89963 жыл бұрын
"They probably have a McDonald's on there knowing America" Thought this was hilarious, we don't have McDonald's but we do have Starbucks☕ on them 😁
@mikeylejan88494 жыл бұрын
Americans love the Baltic states, they are free people and strong allies.
@babochee4 жыл бұрын
I loved working with the Estonians. Their officers have no idea how to properly plan for offensive operations because they've been in the defense for so long with their guns pointed to the east, but they're good people.
@MrJinglejanglejingle4 жыл бұрын
Damn right they are. Sure, they don't really have the sheer military power that the US, or a few of its allies, can project/put to use... But Baltic people are durable as all fuck, and strong. They're naturally hardy people, and most of their soldiers wouldn't make bad Marines.
@rallyecars74494 жыл бұрын
ill tell you right now most Americans don't know what the Baltic States are.
@Brandon-vg7pl4 жыл бұрын
@@rallyecars7449 i will confess that i did not know about them at all until this youtube channel. Ive never been in the military either due to asthma but at 33 years old i feel a slight bit of shame towards my geographic lack of knowledge.
@jeffburnham66114 жыл бұрын
I wonder what Estonia thinks of Trumps intention to pull out of NATO. To me that would be a huge mistake, but we've already seen him shift personnel from countries like Germany over to Poland for what he sees as Germany's failure to pay their share of the defense budget for NATO.
@armyretguy73654 жыл бұрын
“Who pays for this?” The US Taxpayer. Security and military dominance is very important to most Americans. The majority is also very patriotic. Most Americans don’t blink at a 1trillion dollar military budget each year. We even allow the military to request more funds each year incase the budget doesn’t meet the needs of our forces. As a Soldier I’ve been able to do things like order weapon attachments, and equipment that isn’t standard issue. In fact, many Soldiers and Marines in the US will spend their own money on quality of life improvements like not issued gear, improvements to packs (extra pockets sewn own), better quality weapon magazines, etc....
@onetwo11634 жыл бұрын
I might talk shyt about the electricity bill but I will never complain about military funding
@armyretguy73654 жыл бұрын
Vic we all talk shit about the electric bill lol
@armyretguy73654 жыл бұрын
Proud American I don’t need to be thanked, but thanks for the sentiment. Truth be told, serving has been my pleasure. Wish I still could, I just got too messed up.
@M2SG4 жыл бұрын
I agree with what you've said. I have no problem paying taxes to protect our freedom. I appreciate my freedom to sit in my backyard and relax on a nice summer day. Priceless! Thank you for your service!
@boomdos42654 жыл бұрын
Yes. It's fairly standard knowledge that taxpayers the world over will pay for their own government's expenditures. That's the whole point. As for defense spending. As % of GDP...read: nations that can AFFORD it...the United States is middle of the road. Top 5 Defense spenders as part of GDP: Saudia Arabia, Oman, Algeria, Kuwait, Lebanon. As for Americans being "patriotic" they are nor more patriotic than most other nations. You want Jingoism, hypernationalism...to the point if you deface a statue of a historic leader you get 13 years in prison: look at Turkey.
@andrewdoles5024 жыл бұрын
Ships are separated in water-tight compartments to prevent flooding in one area from affecting the whole ship. So it would take many hits in specific spots to do enough damage to actually "sink it". I was a Nuc plant operator on a US Subs.
@doomsquirrel85082 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@lordsnow78544 жыл бұрын
“Only a few countries in the world possess them so they’re like nuclear weapons” In the case of the Nimitz class carriers, they ARE nuclear weapons