EU5 Will have a DYNAMIC trade system! + European political mapmode

Рет қаралды 17,368

Zlewikk TV

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 65

@ZlewikkTV 6 ай бұрын

EU5 'Tinto Talks' playlist - kzbin.info/aero/PLQYwQrZmzDdJKoAdugXTp-g6fG0AI7dNd

@qwinn9963 6 ай бұрын

March of the Eagles 2 looks great!

@r_angel_ov 6 ай бұрын

"I was in RIga last week :D"

@stupnevroman 6 ай бұрын

Changes in price over time period are probably about price revolutions. Like in about 30-40 years from start date, after discovery of silver in saxony/bohemia region and tirol region, when over one lifetime prices jumped x3-4 times, comlete shock to people, guilds and economical stability. And another one, after new world gold flooded Europe, increasing prices again for x5-7 times. In less then a hundred years feudal economy was broken to the point beyond managing or fixing.

@kab.0445 6 ай бұрын

Cant believe they're making stellaris 2

@danvernier198 6 ай бұрын

Whaddya mean Stellaris? Project Ceasar is obvioussly City Skylines.

@blue-d4g 6 ай бұрын

@@danvernier198 Nah, it's pretty obvious by now that it's actually ck4.

@muratonuryilmaz5385 6 ай бұрын

I know , Imperator 2 cames earlier than hoi5

@rotmistrzjanm8776 6 ай бұрын

Ahhhh it reminds me of EU3 where i would make my own trade node in Danzig only to take over other ones with it xD

@Jojogrec 6 ай бұрын

I was excited to learn about this Tinto Talks, and having been recommended another KZbinr's video on it, I kept refreshing Zlewikk's page for this video throughout that day. I wanted to Zlewikk's video on it both because I see him as the biggest Authority on EU4 trade among the KZbinrs I watch and because I like the level of review and analysis he shows in these videos. So while I was tempted to look at another video on this, I'm happy with having waited for this one.

@Muffelll 6 ай бұрын

They really have to cook with this game, if this falls flat that would be bad for paradox

@tanker00v25 6 ай бұрын

“If I die here, I'm dead" kind of comment

@TurtleShinobi42 6 ай бұрын

I doubt they can afford another flop to be honest

@ShiningLight 6 ай бұрын

The "Eastern" in the medieval Roman Empire name is a modern construct. At the time they called it just Roman Empire.

@ZlewikkTV 6 ай бұрын

I refuse to call them that! :v

@Alex_Fahey 6 ай бұрын

If the 'they' you meant is Byzantine subjects, then they would call themselves Roman and say they lived in the Roman Empire. Many other peoples wouldn't call them Roman at all preferring to terms like Hellenes/Greeks/etc. and saying they lived in the Empire/Kingdom of the Greeks.

@ShiningLight 6 ай бұрын

@@Alex_Fahey no, just the Catholics and Protestant did, and they did so for religious reasons (because the Pope refused subordination of his church to the Emperor) and they made a "new", "western", "(holy)", """roman""", "empire" so they could remain independent from the actual Romans living in the east. Everyone else around them excluding them and the Roman themselves (so Persian, Africans, Arabians) referred to them as Romans. The language of the Romans in the East has always been Greek for commerce and diplomacy, to them and anyone else besides the western separatists, nothing changed.

@Alex_Fahey 6 ай бұрын

@@ShiningLight You start your response by ceding the point and saying that all the Catholic world would not call them Roman. Do you not see that this contradicts your original comment? You have just argued that Catholics - which covered much of Europe before, during, and after the mediaeval ages - did not call them Roman (which is frankly far, far more extreme than my own opinion). You argue this yet maintain the idea that calling the ERE something other than simply Roman is a modern invention. Unless you think """modern""" begins somewhere around 800 AD, then I don't understand how you can think your initial statement is true.

@ShiningLight 6 ай бұрын

@@Alex_Fahey that's not what I said in the original post. I said that calling it "Eastern" Roman Empire is a modern invention. At the time, the Catholic called it Empire of the Greeks/Byzantine sure, everyone else they were just Romans, but I meant that the word "Eastern" was never an official title of the state.

@vejolta 6 ай бұрын

imperator: victorian universalis looking pretty good.

@mieszkochojnacki 6 ай бұрын

1:40 I wonder if there will be a ,,feature" where it will be possible that the market with so big attraction annex the main city of another market.

@JK-qi7pp 6 ай бұрын

There has to be, otherwise once you and the AI start creating bigger markets you'd have a single city in the middle of your market that is entirely in their own market.

@unhinged_sinner5850 6 ай бұрын

What about the dynamic dlcs they're going to release? Or all features that will be missing on release day? How many dlc they plan on releasing before its a finished game?

@carlwheezer1030 6 ай бұрын

anyone else assume zlewikk was bald because they always saw him with the hat on

@YC-bk3fl 6 ай бұрын

lmao

@celdur4635 6 ай бұрын

If they paralelice it properly, this is what has been wanted for YEARS now. I guess 16 core / 32 thread CPU could be a godsend.

@kevley26 6 ай бұрын

These videos make me really hyped for EU5!

@arekzawistowski2609 6 ай бұрын

I wasn't that excited because of new game for years. And i found map of 1337 much more interesting. Ireland, British Isles, Poland and southern Rus, northern Rus, Anatolia, Balkans. All those regions looks suitable for quite fast uniting them with more than just one tag what gives great ability to play same region but different tag. Also on Rus , Baltics and in Anatolia play styles can be very different if we would try to conquer region by this or that religion nation.

@HorrorfanlikesZombie 6 ай бұрын

About performance: Most of their games have degrees of poor performance .... from OK to jep, that's that for this playthrough... Paradox has had a poor record when it comes to "transparency" in regards to their games and than under delivering on promises and whisfull thinking ... and the last thing we need is unnecessary hype a baseless optimism PS: 19:23 dude is a dev of course he's not gonna say that the performance at the moment mostly resembles a slide show, unless he wants to get booted out of the company So I let's stay calm and see what day one will bring

@ZlewikkTV 6 ай бұрын

Dude is a game director and the biggest figure in the company, he always says what he thinks and feels, especially after Imperator initial issues

@Vulcanus3231 6 ай бұрын

Let’s GOOOOO

@emilekroth100 6 ай бұрын

This trade system is really hype. Would love playing a pure trade focused nation.

@spatrk6634 6 ай бұрын

i just hope there is some sort of automation in all of this trading and building system. it all seems to in depth and becoming tedious to manage if you are doing world conquest runs and own half of the planet.

@ZlewikkTV 6 ай бұрын

It's in both last 2 videos. Johan said you can eithe fully sutomate it or exclude specific merchants from automation or do it fully manually

@ZlewikkTV 6 ай бұрын

@BobbiusRossius i wouldnt say shit, if they are just 'okay' it will be perfect. 1. It's more than needed for a newbie 2. Experienced players can set up a few strategies resources themselves and let ai automate the rest and 3. Dudes that like roleplaying and micromanaging will be able to do so, great for a tall, trade focused games

@spatrk6634 6 ай бұрын

@BobbiusRossius yea but if you have 150 types of buildings and resources to manage, then as i said, it will be tedious to manage everywhere if you own half of the world. if you give same automation to player as AI uses to build up, then even if its shit it will still be fine because both of you are doing it bad. but as zlewikk said, if you want to micromanage you can still do that. i imagine most people will turn on automation in lots of provinces, but micromanage few mots important ones. otherwise you will spend an hour paused while micromanaging every province every ingame year or whatever

@deeznoots6241 6 ай бұрын

@@ZlewikkTVso exactly like the system in EU3?

@starhaven1881 6 ай бұрын

@@ZlewikkTV I wish I had as much faith as you do in it. The ai in other Paradox games is honestly terrible, Stellaris is a prime example The ai gets massive buffs because if they don't they'd collapse, And they build such terrible worlds and systems its many times more trouble than its worth to conquer them. Hopefully The new game has new ai.

@Turamwdd 6 ай бұрын

I just hope there is warfare in this game.

@notlucas6859 6 ай бұрын

crusader victorialis 5

@MuppetLord1 6 ай бұрын

Have a feeling that EU5 will be a micro management nightmare. 😕

@ZlewikkTV 6 ай бұрын

Did you watch till the part where Johan explains not at all if you dont want to? :p

@fahrenheitdibb2017 6 ай бұрын

it's funny because in EU III we had that already

@danvernier198 6 ай бұрын

Hmm, at least one thing is wrong about that coloured in map. Denmark in 1337 is a de jure only kingdom that controls pretty much no territory. So Scania is all wrong it should have a border in it between Scania and Blekinge belonging to Sweden and Halland to Mecklenburg.

@deeznoots6241 6 ай бұрын

Idk why people are talking about March of the eagles and Stellaris, the dynamic trade system shows it is clearly a sequel to Europa Universalis 3. Thank god because the first time they tried to make a sequel to eu3 they made a game that was a piece of crap and totally worthless

@billyherrington5112 6 ай бұрын

So Victoria mechanics in Europa Universalis

@Schwizinberg 6 ай бұрын

Well shit, now im sure that my computer will not be able to support EUV... shame it is

@DonutOfNinja 6 ай бұрын

You said that there was an interesting dev diary. Where can i read this? 10/10 Tinto talk though

@ZlewikkTV 6 ай бұрын

Johan talks about Tinto Talks as dev diares every week ;)

@DonutOfNinja 6 ай бұрын

@@ZlewikkTV lies, deception!

@dogebestest7187 6 ай бұрын

I mean it looks interesting and like it will be good fun but man is it different from EU4 and i like EU4 so thats a little worried. Like yeah people say eu4 is a bit of a boardgame, and its true, its gamey, but its a good game i think.