Does Gravity decrease Entropy?

Does gravitational attraction violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics? My Patreon page is at / eugenek

[@LuigiToby]

We need official merch for this channel, imagine having one of those marbles with infinite elasticity.

[@bestaround3323]

Man I could really use a couple of those

[@PotionsMaster666]

Brruuhh... I want them fuzzy Photons resting on my palm

[@mohammedaznadi897]

Imagine the universe collapsing 😂

[@metcas]

Attach little magnets to each marble, and have them bounce inside a coil, and you got yourself infinite electricity LOL

[@timothydana2726]

Underrated comment

[@quantisz4416]

I see in many places people describing entropy simply as "disorder". In the videos of this channel the concept of entropy (and many others) is explained with much more comprehension, depth and detailing. Great video as always Mr. Eugene.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. As you are probably already aware, I have a video titled, "Entropy is not Disorder" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/rInCiH-omMycocU

[@akhandpratapsingh3319]

Let me claim this is the most underrated science channel on KZbin. This quality content needs much more attention 👍💖

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Edit: Unfortunately, Sleeping Warrior has become the first person I have ever had to ban from commenting on this channel due to the fact that he kept posting the same comment over and over again under everyone else’s comments. Note: When someone is banned from commenting, all their previous comments are deleted. Everyone else: Thanks for the compliments.

[@primonomeultimonome]

Guys, Sleeping Warrior *is a flat earth troll.* It's up to you whether feed him or not.

[@teemo8247]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Eugene please do not take any crap from this dude. Your channel is what brought me to the scientific world, at such a young age. The first time i heard about Special relativity and quantum mechanics was through your videos, and I will never forget the feeling of being completley amazed by the concepts, by your animations, the narrator and the excellent explanations!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Teemo, thanks for the compliments.

[@primonomeultimonome]

Just to be clear: before feeding Sleeping Warrior, consider that he claimed or implied things like: - the Earth is flat - science is qualitative, not quantitative - gravity is not a force, therefore it doesn't exist, and Einstein is the one who proved it - relative density is the reason why things go down - the Earth has no geometric horizon therefore it cannot be measured and many other pearls of wisdom you can find on his channel.

[@ilickcatnip]

Great animations, easy to understand explanation and intuitive flow of arguments throughout the video, and all this in just about 5mins. This is the type of quality content I subscribed for, and you never fail to deliver!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments. I am glad you like my videos.

[@bruce-le-smith]

agreed, these are masterful videos!

[@chitrakchatterjee7495]

I don't know you, neither you know me. But I think these videos connect us every single time you upload one.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad you like my videos. Thanks.

[@chitrakchatterjee7495]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Actually I don't like your videos, I Love your videos.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@LuisAldamiz]

Sure thing. Hi there, stranger.

[@ishworshrestha3559]

Ok

[@parshvpatel9644]

Your videos are to the point and pure subject , no distraction of harsh voice or irritating graphics ! Thisisrelly cool

[@rafakordaczek3275]

omg, this title alone made my mind smoke.

[@spamwisegamgee8796]

Yeah I had to pause for a minute before clicking on to this... I didn't know if I was prepared.

[@2Storyz]

That's because in the current paradigm the objects weren't at rest. They "expanded" faster than the speed of light in such a way that the "universe" is flat so off the bat, the premise is deeply flawed

[@graystone2802]

Mind is smoke

[@gorgit]

@@2Storyz im relatively new to physics, so can you explain why they expanded faster than light, while also colliding with each other multiple times? Wheres the flaw? This system is clearly something that happens in the universe on a regular basis. Or where am I wrong?

[@charliepearce8767]

@@gorgit Physics is not something you learn Physics is something you live every day. Look around you in everything you do.

[@michaelwang1730]

I am so confident in the quality of your videos that I always hit the like button before watching, and after I watch wished there's two more like buttons to hit.

[@stormtrooper9404]

One and only YT channel on which I first put a like on the new video... and than watch it! Eugene! You are doing awesome job!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you like my videos.

[@mj-8489]

Thank you so much for all the work you put into these videos

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.

[@julientaurus4174]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky We could easily experiment your simulation in the ISS. We put different balls floating at rest (tennis, bowling, golf, etc...), and we see what happens. Each ball will create her own gravity floating inside the ISS. So we should see all the balls collapsing at final to the heaviest ball (bowling for example).. your video explains we should observe this result.. But you're wrong, because you forgot the Lagrange orbits. Inside the ISS, objects floating, initially at rest, create an equilibrate system, exactly as they have already experimented with MnM's. ♉♉♉

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Julien, this has already been explained in great detail in the thread under your comment.

[@julientaurus4174]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thank you to answer. But everyone is wrong, scientists have misconception about gravity. In your video, when a marble is situated on a Lagrange point, it shouldn't move anymore. On a Lagrange point, all forces are equilibrated. Also, scientists don't realize that gravity of an object is made by gravity of all the atoms of this object. For example, the gravity relation between earth and moon is created by the gravity relation between all earth's atoms and moon's atoms. Gravity is an electromagnetic force. Scientists also don't understand what a sphere volume means. I'm French and it's very hard for me to explain in english. In a sphere, all forces are applied in one direction, but also in opposite direction, because of the fact it's a sphere. For example, if you face to earth, south pole is attracted to north pole, both right side and left side. So, the poles cannot collapse in the center of earth, and the gravity between the 2 poles has for result to make earth rotate in itself. In your simulation, marbles shouldn't collapse in one point at the end. If the marbles were initially at rest, they should create an equilibrated system, exactly as molecules are equilibrated system composed by atoms. I really thank you for your patience to read and answer me. I'd like you, or others scientists, to find a theory of everything, easily, just changing your conception of gravity in universe : Gravity in universe has exactly the same laws than in an atom: gravity creates energy fields, and Lagrange orbits are the frontiers between these fields.

[@julientaurus4174]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Scientists should understand that relativity of Einstein is exactly the same than quantic probabilities: "It's probably like this" "Probably? You're not sure?" "No I'm not sure, because it depends of lots of things.... It's relative to lots of things" Relativity in universe is the expression of the quantic probabilities.

[@Bowserex]

Thanks Eugene, love these informative video's!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.

[@aashsyed1277]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky thanks sooooooo much

[@larbicherifsaid99]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky in case universe is contracting, the entopy will decrease as even photon emitted by different stars will occupy less time with time especially when all stars and matter get together and to create a big black hole

[@theonlyramankumar8359]

You're one of the greatest person in the world like Einstein who is able to make anybody understand everything about physics!... You're brilliant... Big fan!!! Love from India 💕

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the really great compliments.

[@theonlyramankumar8359]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky ❤️🙏

[@julientaurus4174]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky I hope you'll read this message. If gravity between objects correspond to gravity between all the atoms of each object, then gravity is an electromagnetic force. And then gravity attract south pole of each object, but repulse north pole of each object. And so the result of gravity is not to collapse objects, the result is to make objects rotate on themselves and between them. Gravity force from sun attract one pole of the earth, but repulse the other one, and so it has to result to make earth rotate on itself and around the sun, exactly as we can observe. And if earth was initially at rest, gravity force from sun made it start to move, to rotate. I won't insist anymore. Thank you Eugene. I really wait your next video with impatience. ♉♉♉

[@anonymous.youtuber]

Just fantastic how easily you explain things like this. 🙏🏻

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you like my explanations.

[@anonymous.youtuber]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky I remember my professors at the university repeating over and over “entropy is a just a measure of disorder”. That never made any sense to me. Your explanation makes so much more sense.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. As you might already be aware, I have a video titled "Entropy is not Disorder" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/rInCiH-omMycocU

[@sergiuszstrzelczyk7984]

Mann, I love the statistical explanation of entropy it's so elegant

[@chriszachtian]

This video is unique. Why? Because no one I saw until now has neither even touched nor covered this with that simple explanations and within 6 minutes. They always take it as granted. Very good job! By the way, with "Bernoulli effect on atomic scale" it was the same. You seem to teach by intuition, and this intuition is, to my mind, a very good one.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments.

[@TeamSkeptic]

My favorite Physics channel.. HANDS DOWN!!!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.

[@primonomeultimonome]

Hey Team Skeptic! Go say hello to Riley, he is around trolling about gravity not being a force.

[@primonomeultimonome]

@Flat Earth Data Unfortunately it is.

[@ilickcatnip]

@Flat Earth Data except it is.

[@tenzindorjee7689]

Love your videos from Tibet Really helpful for my high school studies

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you like my videos and I am glad that my videos have been helpful.

[@talleyhoe846]

This channel is an excellent example of what a valuable resource KZbin can be.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment.

[@GaryFerrao]

Your videos are so few and far between. But when they are available, they are gold. This is the perfect use of the notification bell on KZbin. No noise. Pure quality.

[@GaryFerrao]

Also, your animations and voice are ageless - they never get old!~

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments. The narration is done by my friend, Kira Vincent.

[@MrShtrudL]

Thank you so so much for getting rid of the background music! I (and I'm sure that many more) really appreciate that. Now it is possible to clearly hear the narrating and think about the information more clearly. I am a Physics undergraduate and this is wonderful.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am not sure what you are referring to. The background music is still there. Thanks for the compliment about my video.

[@MrShtrudL]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Ohh I see, perhaps my volume is too low, it's reliving either way, even of the music is at lower volumes :) Thanks for the attention and keep on the good job! Fantastic content!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@brianflaherty9054]

I’ve tried to find an answer to this question, without luck, for years! Thanks for the explanation.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad my video was able to provide the answer you were looking for. Thanks.

[@David_Lee379]

Thanks Dr. Khutoryansky; I love all your videos. Even with a master’s degree in engineering, I still learn so much! And your narrator does a great job too. 👍

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@alamagordoingordo3047]

One of your best videos.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video. But, I think that many of my other videos are much better, such as "Thermodynamics and the End of the Universe" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/fYDViKyVrrN1rLs

[@rahulshetty9335]

Great Video Eugene!!!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

[@FIRE_STORMFOX-3692]

You were blessed by the algorithm! Let's see how it goes from now on..

[@prakharsoni6406]

These videos are like Gravity attracting us to watch more and more amazing and interesting stuff

[@zovisapphire]

I would love to see a collab between you and ScienceClic English at some point c: Both of your videos are too the point without overcomplicating things

[@yosefgomgom225]

Yeah, I would love to see it, the most epic explainers collab!

[@prasitpoonpipatkit250]

I understand this video quite well. After seen your 7 years ago video namely, Thermodynamics and the End of the Universe: Energy, Entropy, and the fundamental laws of physics with some misunderstanding point in the last month. In that video, time 20:20-21:20, I think, about the sun, that it is dissipating heat to be function properly. So the earth is. Thank you so much for your kindness! Thanks on The great of all wise man!

[@brianjoelbasualdo7436]

You always know how to surprise us with new content.

[@shubhanshukaroliya]

As usual sir you again blown my mind from your video.....🔥🔥🔥

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@feynstein1004]

Ah so as always, gravity *appears* to decrease entropy locally, while actually increasing it globally.

[@platoniczombie]

Except how does something like Earth give off photons? Or blackholes? Both have gravity and do not act like stars. That part made it a little confusing for me.

[@feynstein1004]

@@platoniczombie Everything gives off infra-red/microwave photons until it reaches thermal equilibrium. That's basic thermodynamics, my man. With black holes it's a bit tricky because they don't give off photons directly, but they still emit Hawking radiation, which is mostly photons. Meaning eventually all of their mass gets converted into photons. There's no way to escape entropy afaik.

[@platoniczombie]

@@feynstein1004 I just get a little confused because I feel as though the explanation is using two different sciences to explain one thing. Are all photons equal? Those emitted by stars are equal to those emitted by blackholes and planets? I'm more inclined to see the universe as an ecosystem than this mysterious entity of emptiness with massive and microscopic objects tumbling about. Do we claim an ecosystem in harmony is at equilibrium, thus, follows the rules of thermodynamics? I ask this with genuine curiosity.

[@babyyoda5074]

@@platoniczombie All photons are not equal. Photons are carriers of electromagnetic radiation or light, so some photons have higher frequency than other(are of higher energy than others). You can look for electromagnetic radiation spectrum kzbin.info/www/bejne/o2XXaJqKoqd-ack. There is also something called blackbody spectrum which describes how objects with different temperatures emit photons of different frequencies. The sun's temperature is about 5800 K at the surface which emits photons mostly in range of the visible spectrum and less photons of higher and lower frequencies than visible light. The surface of earth having far less temperature emits photons mostly in the infrared ranges which is invisible to our eyes.

[@pedrolmlkzk]

@@platoniczombie All photons are equal, what change is the ammount energy they carry individually and therefore their frequency

[@modernphil1049]

Wow. Nobody makes videos about questions which a beginner might ask. It makes it more difficult for beginners to gain understanding. I was very fortunate to have my misconceptions about entropy to be cleared by this video. Thanks.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

[@pragalbhawasthi1618]

An excellent one, as always... wish to see more of these coming...

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. More videos are on their way.

[@angelmunoz1925]

Excellent demostrtion vidio. Thank you

[@ViratKohli-jj3wj]

I LOVE your videos Eugene. You are an awesome person

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments.

[@Owen_loves_Butters]

Before watching this video, I'd guess the answer to the question is that gravity causes entropy to decrease locally, but the energy released as objects collide and energy dissipates results in an overall increase in entropy of the universe. Most supposed violations of the 2nd law of thermodynamics have this same explanation (local decrease in entropy but universal increase).

[@monicaprazeres]

Oh boy...Eugene did it again!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@gregoryallen0001]

understanding entropy is my 2021 goal

[@pindo5189]

I like me myself some yello fuzzy spheres :3

[@aayush9274]

Yeah description of video shocked me but video settles me down again 😊😊

[@physicslover1950]

Wow my mentor that was amazing . 😱😱😱😍😍😍😍🙋🙋🙋 I really loved the way you described entropy with the example of distribution of velocities. 🌹🌹🌹💞💞💞

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you liked my explanation.

[@srinivasaprameyah.s468]

Second law and GR is the most universal laws know !

[@Fireway12]

Energy Conservation sends its regards

[@dwijgurram5490]

@@Fireway12 dark matter enters chat*

[@srinivasaprameyah.s468]

@@Fireway12 psedotensors can take care of them !

[@JeroenSchoenmaker]

Nice video!I know that this is the general view on the matter and that this is a channel devoted to the general public. So, the video does a very nice job in portraying the mainstream view. However, taking it to a more academic level, the rather established thermodynamic models connecting gravity and entropy are related toblack-hole physics and the issue is not settled. So, if someone is interested,in the following manuscript I put forward the idea that gravity can indeed decrease entropy. I know that my stance is not mainstream but the argument is discussed thoroughly qualitatively and mathematically. I believe maybe some of you may appreciate. Look for title "Historical and Physical Account on Entropy and Perspectives on the Second Law of Thermodynamics for Astrophysical and Cosmological Systems"

[@YaffaSch]

Awesome!

[@kartikg.kartikg]

Fur Elise at background is so soothing..😄😅

[@BenjaminSteber]

Once you get that heat is released as energy from systems that lower their entropy and/or increase in their organizational structure, and that enough of that heat energy always out spends the loss of entropy the whole concept becomes aa lot easier to grasp.

[@caiolopezcomz]

Awesome video, and a very solid explanation of a concept so frequently mistaken. Really appreciate the new background music volume. More subtle, less distracting. Still not sure why would you need 3 music changes in a 5 minute long video though. I'd suggest to loop the first one all the way.

[@IncompleteTheory]

I would love to see you discuss this with Sir Penrose. As far as I understand it, one of the pilar of CCC is based on the assumption that the evolution mass from evenly dispersed to clumped matter (aka black holes) seemingly contradicts the 2nd law of thermodynamics. This video seems to prove him wrong, or does it not?

[@antoniomoyal]

This video demands one for entropy and life

[@teemo8247]

1:42 "Fuzzy Yellow spheres" gotta love that description lol

[@bhoopendrathakur2496]

this video is definetely awesome , please make some more videos related to elctrical and elctronic subject , mostly related to power electronic , your channel have very good content ,love it ...

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

More videos are on their way. Thanks for the compliments.

[@bhoopendrathakur2496]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky that`s great i am very excited about that

[@kushagr7132]

😊thanks This question was frustrating me for 1 year

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad my video helped answer your question.

[@jonathanborrelli2749]

I'm still a little confused. You said even as the size of the entire universe is contracting, the entropy is still increasing. Does this continue to be true even as it shrinks down to a single point in the big crunch?

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am not sure what would happen at the exact moment of the Big Crunch, as the mathematics for all of our known laws of physics would break down at that point.

[@mi.m1]

Big fan of Eugene from Indian Occupied Kashmir. ❤️

[@srinivasaprameyah.s468]

What the hell do u mean indian occupied Kashmir ? Kashmir is literally Union territory of India !

[@lkjhfdszxcvbnm]

I'm really glad to read this comment.

[@mi.m1]

@@lkjhfdszxcvbnm Thanks :)

[@MichelleHell]

The most practical way of understanding entropy is in trying to reverse a process, specifically heat flow. There is no known perfect insulator capable of trapping heat indefinitely. This means we cannot have 100% efficiency when we do heat and energy transfers and transformations. I've seen entropy referred to as the universal "heat tax". Heat and energy radiate at a rate that is greater than is physically possible to reverse the process. This makes sense because you expend energy in pursuit of recycling it until eventually you run out of energy, which becomes the heat death of the universe. Entropy itself is a measure of the distribution of energy states, where zero would be a perfect insulator. In a simple way, entropy is the universe constantly escaping our grasp.

[@Deepak-po6pn]

If lord exist on earth,then they will exist in you. ⚓How your contributions towards educating laws of nature in more adorable way. 🎻You born with a novel blood ,.. Your are beyond the level of goodness. Thanks you for this channel 🍁

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the really great compliments.

[@dnstone1127]

These videos really get your mind thinking, like to see one on the cooling expansion of gas molecules and entropy.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I cover cooling expansion of gas molecules in my video "Thermodynamics and the End of the Universe" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/fYDViKyVrrN1rLs

[@satvikvarun6386]

Thanks My high school question was answered

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

[@JohannY2]

Never thought of it like this before.

[@WiillZero]

Thank you so much for all of your videos. Love and greetings from Cali, Colombia. A war zone right now

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you liked my videos. I hope everything in Colombia turns out OK.

[@solapowsj25]

Students and researchers may study gravity from fundamentals in the interaction Surface 2-D x-plane of the Graviton. The 3-D and other volume space and event may then be observed for further knowledge.

[@Extremetothemax1]

Nice explanation.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@ar.rekhaverma1906]

Very Unique and Out of the box ideas... Loved it... By the way, would like to know which software have you used to create these vids, since I have assignments to do which are mostly animation-based.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I make my 3D animations with "Poser."

[@ar.rekhaverma1906]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thank you

[@crimsonalucard]

It's still important to note that the system is still becoming more ordered. Entropy is increasing but the system is still self organizing into ordered configurations of spheres of atoms while ejecting photons to become more spread out. This is not a temporary local phenomenon. The entire universe is self organizing into orbits/spirals/spheres while ejecting energy as photons. These photons are too spread out to ever disperse the atoms. So yes entropy is increasing, but at the same time an increase in entropy equals an increase in order. Ordered spheres/orbits/spirals is the higher probability configuration here.

[@jonathanjocobo5654]

Thermo is hard yet necessary to understand, thanks for the video

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@Pheonix1328]

It wasn't long ago that I finally understood entropy when I made a program to simulate coin flips. To get 100 heads out of 100 flips there is only one way but to get 50 heads there are many more so that's why the graph I made formed a bell curve centred on 50. Reality tends towards 50/50 split in this case simply because that result has more options, just like you said.

[@Gringohuevon]

its not a bell curve

[@nivaldolemos5280]

Which makes you suspicious that entropy can decrease sometimes... it's just so unlikely that, in the macroscopic level, you don't get to see it, unless you observe the system for a very, very long time.

[@Pheonix1328]

@@nivaldolemos5280 It not suspicious at all. Although it's unlikely to get 100 heads in a row it isn't impossible and any system can achieve this but it won't remain that way for long as it will tend to the state with the most "options". See: Poincaré recurrence theorem. It is especially hard since it has to be a closed system, which doesn't exist outside of thought experiments and computer sims.

[@Pheonix1328]

@@Gringohuevon It definitely is, unless you have evidence otherwise.

[@Phooldeinetwork]

Great explaination

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@Jopie65]

I've recently heard a description of entropy that made a lot of sense to me: How much information of a system are you ignoring when you describe it with certain properties like temperature? That much ignored information (velocities/positions of individual particles) is the entropy.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I cover the information definition of Entropy in my video on Maxwell's Demon at kzbin.info/www/bejne/bobMnapvqZKmr7M

[@thechetanrahi]

You are so great 👍 I am very thankful for this all

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you liked my video.

[@Lolwutdesu9000]

Small caveat: entropy is only a distribution of velocities and energies when considering purely mechanical system. In truth, we have to return to a more abstract definition (such as the distribution of information) when applying the notion of entropy to any system, for instance a quantum system, where we have more properties to take into consideration.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Yes, that is correct. As I said in the video, "Entropy is a measure of how many different ways something can occur." That can include any properties of the system. Thanks.

[@caveyful]

OK, so what happens when gravitational time dilation is applied? Theoretically entropy should be reduced.

[@KogiSyl]

If the universe expands and entropy is a measure of how many variations of events can occur, then energy will at some point get dispersed so much, that no event can occur any more and there will bo no more variations of anything.

[@samapanbhadury5148]

Nice question and wise answer

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@Mysoi123]

Another tremendously helpful video!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@VyvienneEaux]

This even helps me understand black body radiation better!

[@hetdave8679]

Thank u so much , can u please make a video on following topics if u get time Does Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle hold true at Absolute zero, because as Kinetic energy is 0 , velocity is 0 and position is constant Does spontaneous synchronisation violate 2nd law ? If not why ?

[@physicslover1950]

Oh yes this confusing topic really need a video. Nice suggestion.

[@rohanshah7158]

Yea , even i have doubts regarding that

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. Yes, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle always holds. If the kinetic energy could be exactly zero, this would mean that we know the momentum with 100% certainty, which would mean that have no knowledge of the positions. And to the best of our knowledge, nothing violates the second law of thermodynamics. I will add spontaneous synchronization to my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.

[@hetdave8679]

@@EugeneKhutoryansky yes but as the velocity is 0 due to 0 kinetic energy, position should be known as the particle is not moving i saw this but some part of it was confusing physics.stackexchange.com/questions/56170/absolute-zero-and-heisenberg-uncertainty-principle

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Het Dave, the conversation in the link you provided simply states that many systems can never reach a state where the kinetic energy is exactly zero.

[@jkinkamo]

This and "The End Of The Universe" are cool videos.Thanks!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@FindLiberty]

I think gravity is the result of the Aether _slowly_ and gently pushing everything nearby, together. It yields as long as the relative movement is slow. It's undetectable unless the mass is very high. Light is a _very fast_ wave propagating through the ubiquitous Aether; even a lightning bug can produce it.

[@tomsmith4542]

nice explanation

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you like my explanation.

[@paulomartins1008]

If all particles of a field are contained within a subset of that space such that non can be found in a complementary subsets like in the example given where a mass is emmiting photons, then the entropy has in fact been reduced irreversibly - by removing one of the phase spaces of the space - mass from its other subsets, we reduce the dimensionality of entropy.

[@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885]

Penrose emphasizes that time is asymmetric and hence the origin of the Universe is when gravitational entropy is very low and coherent.

[@Rolancito]

I thought at first this was a video about water going to the bottom in a half-filled glass in presence of gravity

[@ranjitkalita3734]

All of your videos are awesome🤩🤩🤩🤩. I don't know why you have so less subscribers. Maybe the channel name is not that catchy. Try changing it if you want. All the best👍👍👍

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliment. It is too late to change the channel name.

[@Konstantinos340]

location can be exclusive, you can degrease entropy in one locale but simultaneously it must increase somewhere else.

[@karlherlin4402]

I started studying physics partly because of your videos. I remember trying to figure out special relativity through your channel many times when I was younger, and it was such a thrill once the basic ideas clicked. I am now writing my master thesis in theoretical physics. Thank you so much!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

I am glad that my videos have made a difference and that they have been helpful. Thanks.

[@Rivenburg-xd5yf]

Entropy lowers or lessons during cooling. Heating or steady state, entropy increases. The bulk of ALL non-plasma matter we have encountered is highly organised into crystals. They form during cooling, not steady state or heating state.

[@JasonRWait]

RE: the video title.. I think the video should mention the role of gravitational radiation and/or consider the case for particles which don't interact electromagnetically :D huge fan

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Yes, the system can also disperse energy by emitting gravitational waves or by emitting particles other than photons. Thanks.

[@robertcarter9800]

I'm a third-year physics student who has already taken and passed introductory thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, yet I still learned something in this video, as well as all of your other videos.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad my videos are helpful.

[@LawatheMEid]

Yor videos are rich in value and Easy understandable. Any future video about Feynman's symbols?

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Feynman diagrams are on my list of topics for future videos.

[@rey1242]

Just to give more context to people. Decreasing entropy DOES NOT violate the second law of thermodynamics. The change in entropy of the universe is equal to the change in entropy in the local system plus the change in entropy in adjacent systems. So a local system may decrease its entropy at the cost of increasing entropy in the adjacent systems. Also, it is POSSIBLE for the entropy in the universe to decrease, but this is a statistically improbable event. Even then, it is still possible.

[@bernardobertamini856]

Amazing! Simply amazing! Thank you so much!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

[@sunitasharma2536]

1:50 wow great you consider every scenes in your animation.That is one of a particle can revolve around bunch of those created in free space. As centripetal force is enough to revolve in orbit warps space -time by those. And video was really good❤️

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks for the compliments.

[@viniciusfernandes2303]

Thanks for the video!

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

[@dinglerdangler]

good stuff eugene

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks.

[@onderozenc4470]

Temperature of universe Is decreasing during the expansion. This can be interpreted as decrease in entropy or the entropy of universe had always been zero which doesn't violate the the second law of entropy : dS > 0 or =0 for spontaneous phenomena.

[@navveidsanayei5687]

An irrelevant question, but a perfect answer

[@theveryaveragegamer9865]

Technically the second law of thermodynamics isn't a guarantee. There have been small scale tests where entropy decreases, like a neutral temperature substance splitting into a hot and cold one. It was only in a handful of atoms but still.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

You may want to watch my video "Entropy: Why the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is a fundamental law of physics" at kzbin.info/www/bejne/rHabY4N6f6drpdk

[@ifollowtheantichristandthe9218]

Thanks for the upload, Eugene. It would be good if you also make video about quantum gravity, and how quantum gravity can explain us what was during and before the Planck epoch.

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

Thanks. Unfortunately, we don't yet have a theory of Quantum Gravity. Although there is a lot of speculation about it, I prefer to focus on well established theories. Thanks.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Beginning of this video: (objects crunching together due to gravity): Consider the following copy and paste from my files: Consider the following: * There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1: a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. * 3 reduced down to 2: a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die. * 2 reduced down to 1: a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity. (And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.) And then ask yourself the following questions: 1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents. 2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input. Additionally, with the conservation of energy, as energy moves into the vertical plane from the center of the horizontal plane, energy from the horisontal plane moves to the center of the horizontal plane to replace the energy that moved into the vertical plane. 3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center. 4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence. 5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity. 6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to? Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things. Our true destiny currently appears to be: 1. We are ALL going to die one day from something. 2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced. 3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place. Eternal Death 'IS' Eternal Peace. Currently: Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA) * (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.) ** Hence also though, legalizing suicide (or at least make suicide not illegal) so as to let people leave this life on their own terms if they wish to do so. Many people and species are going to die in the 6th mass extinction event that has already started, at least some, horrible deaths. Many will wish they could die, and all will, eventually. And the 6th mass extinction event will not be the last mass extinction event for this Earth. But if suicide were legal (or at least not illegal), at least some people would not have the added guilt of breaking societies' law before doing so. Just trying to plan ahead here. Giving people an 'out' if they wish to take it. Added Note: As this is a search for the real absolute truth concerning the future, please feel free to copy and paste this elsewhere to further the analysis and discussion.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

BUT: What exactly is 'gravity'?

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Do my gravity test for my TOE idea and possibly find out: (copy and paste from my files): Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.) (An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

TOE idea: (copy and paste from my files): Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows: Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction; Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction. Then: 1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe. (And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have). And also how possibly mathematical constants exist in this universe as well.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

The mathematics for the TOE doesn't even exist yet as far as I am currently aware. It goes beyond any quantum field theory formulas that I am currently aware of. The outline though is basically as follows: The formula has at least 3 levels to it: 1. The Internal Photon Level: The 3 interacting forces, (which might even be just a singular force with 3 different modalities), all interacting at basically 90 degrees to each other and all simultaneously pulsating and swirling. A complex part of the formula but I believe to be totally doable. 2. The External Photon Level: For each pulsating, swirling photon, all the pulsating, swirling photons interacting with it. An exponential part of the formula that I am not even sure modern day super computers could adequately handle. 3. The Inter-dimensional Photon Level: For each modality within each photon would have an energy frequency associated with it. The energy frequencies could be seen as being in their own space time dimension. (For me, 'space' is energy itself of which is the 'gem' photon and 'time' is the flow of energy; 'temperature' is the interaction of energy), so one would be dealing with way more than just 3 spatial dimensions and way more than just 1 time dimension (as there would many different energy frequencies with many different flows of energy). Whenever like resonate energy frequencies resonated with each other, they would affect each other, kind of like 'spooky action at a distance'. Anytime energy frequencies overlapped, there would be a temporary spike of some sort in each space time dimension. In addition, if in reality the 'gem' photon is just a singular force with 3 different modalities, it's possible that energy could 'slip' between modalities which would also affect the results. A very complex part of the formula on top of all the complexity that came before it. 4. Any time any energy moved in the system, the entire formula would have to be recalculated due to potential ripple effects. 5. In addition, I am operating in a realm where one plus one does not always equal two, and often does not. Like I said above, I don't even believe the mathematics exists yet for what I am trying to do, but at a minimum, the formula would contain the above levels the way I currently see it to be. And I never said it would be easy.

[@morkovija]

to our mankind library of quality content

[@ackokul4086]

Hi, may i translate your videos and reupload them?

[@EugeneKhutoryansky]

No, you can't copy and reupload my videos. Many of my videos already have subtitles available in many languages. To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). If the language you want is missing for a particular video, and you want to help me add the subtitles that will appear on my channel, please send me an email. My email address is available in the "about" tab of my KZbin home page. I will email you the subtitle file in English (which includes the timings). You will then be able to edit the file to replace the English with the translation, and then email the file back to me. I will then upload it to my channel, where it will be available for everyone to view. Thanks.