For more chalkboard videos including the next one: kzbin.info/aero/PLZZOG63zmCLE1eWvazftEMl8kMpXvSzst
@goldCrystalhaze17 күн бұрын
That is why math is wrongly hated. More than 25 years back, when I was a student, not even one teacher bothered to take 10 minutes to break down this formula to us.
@danielweatherman225217 күн бұрын
Yah Same....none of this was discussed.....dropped out of math when this was starting.
@CohenRautenkranz13 күн бұрын
Respectfully, I would wager a guess that the sequence in which you learned the necessary parts simply connected these same dots much more slowly. For example, if you took a person with only a rudimentary knowledge of arithmetic and tried to show them this, they would (rightfully) struggle greatly. There are a mountain of foundational concepts which build up to this. It is an unquestionably elegant result - as are almost all great theories. Relatively, quantum probability, etc. can each be summed up on a single page - but take years to fully grasp. You just happen to be at the point in your journey where a Taylor expansion, derivatives, exponentials, imaginary numbers, etc. aren't like a new language - and good on you for that! Lots of talented educators have sought a path around that and there are good reasons that no one has really found a better way yet. (We will likely agree that there are better and worse teachers!) Cheers!
@ZatoichiRCS11 күн бұрын
You give teacher too much credit. That’s why he does this work. Teachers in general don’t have a clue. They mean well but meaning well is not understanding.
@christopherward274811 күн бұрын
Teacher didn't understand it herself
@treeross10 күн бұрын
It is in Calc 2. You have to prove it using calculus so they don't even begin to explain it until then.
@Сделайэтодома17 күн бұрын
I have zero use for the information you're sharing here. But you make it so interesting that once I start watching I can't stop.
@alithedazzling16 күн бұрын
That’s the goal, to make learning fun!
@happyhippo466415 күн бұрын
That equation always blows my mind. How can two transcendental numbers and an imaginary number combine to form an integer? Euler was a genius and my favorite mathematician.
@Delan199418 күн бұрын
Thank you Dr. Ali . Keep up the great work, we appreciate you.
@DD-gi6kx18 күн бұрын
that taylor swift is multi talented
@oddvenn18 күн бұрын
If only that were Taylor Swift…
@bradatherton936915 күн бұрын
@oddvenn the remark was a play off of Ali's remark at 5:17
@primajump17 күн бұрын
I woke up in the middle of the night and couldn't get back to sleep. So, as usual, I began learning something new in mathematics. I find this time to be very productive in terms of absorbing new concepts. I came across this video and got curious. I am just a math enthusiast who is now retired and spends a fair bit of time catching up on mathematics. This made me truly understand why Euler is considered the greatest mathematician who ever lived. You made me appreciate the real beauty of Euler's formula. It felt like a detective story as I tried to stay ahead of you and guess what would come next. It was so much fun! You were quick, but I had no problem following along. Now, I kick myself for not pursuing this path earlier. At 67, it's not too late-at least for having some fun with mathematics. Keep up the great work, and thank you for taking me on this wonderful journey.
@dagoff030917 күн бұрын
Hi, at 72 I share your enthusiasm for math. I suggest you find the channel 3Blue1Brown for awesome visual tutorials on many aspects of mathematics.
@arlenestanton995517 күн бұрын
I, too am retired and do math as a hobby. Great to have found a kindred spirit!
@life_is_beatiful188313 күн бұрын
Diving into mathematics is never too late. Its beautiful.
@stephannikoloff10 күн бұрын
Thank you for your videos Mr Ali. I'm like a kid at christmas, when I see that you have a new video out. Concerning the reason amateurs like the formula is perhaps that it illustrates all of the conceptual revolutions of mathematics through the history of the subject ... the discovery of unity, zero, negative numbers, irrational numbers, imaginary numbers, calculus ... and many more.
@testboga599118 күн бұрын
This video is exactly what I've been waiting for a long time. Thank you very much.
@ABOAdam-g8r18 күн бұрын
I have ever seen like this explaining ما شاء الله عليك وفقك الله.
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
Thank you! Glad you like the videos
@Stoicsnowadays18 күн бұрын
Even though I am already happy with my major, (communications and systems engineering) you are hyping me up even more! Explaining in detail the how and why of each equation. Keep up the excellent work! Greetings from Greece
@nasir_khan-1618 күн бұрын
Nice explanation Ali Sir, I'm from Kashmir and in my last semester of Mtech at IIT Jammu i used Eulers equation for analysis of dynamic system subjected to perodic excitation and evaluating response of dynamic system. From your explanation i now understood why Eulers equation is used in structural dynamics course. Thanks for the explanation.
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed the explanation!
@iWillRun_K17 күн бұрын
Kashmir is such a beautiful place,
@nasir_khan-1617 күн бұрын
@@iWillRun_K yes indeed
@DavidAKZ16 күн бұрын
@@iWillRun_K is it safe for tourists ?
@iWillRun_K15 күн бұрын
@@DavidAKZ Its mostly safe., My grandfather visited recently , he enjoyed it. But yeah if you are visiting to any new place take caution regardless
@riderpaul16 күн бұрын
I love your clarity. It's been 30 years and I don't use it that often so thanks for the refresher!
@alithedazzling16 күн бұрын
It’s always good to revisit these ideas!
@walterstevens867618 күн бұрын
Great video. Its nostagic, looking at these early maths building blocks...
@MrBroseph1918 күн бұрын
Beautiful. Keep this series going. Thank you!
@louis-karimnebati61433 күн бұрын
I really like your demonstration, one of the best elegant one I've seen. You plugged more Beauty in e !!! Thank you
@alithedazzling3 күн бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@wus947218 күн бұрын
Outstanding explanation.
@Tade.G.B16 күн бұрын
Thank you Dr.Ali appreciate your clarity
@DistortedV1218 күн бұрын
Dr. Ali, you are the man. We are almost getting to path integral and schrodinger equation.
@sangramd867517 күн бұрын
The Taylor Swift joke cracked me up😂. Particularly the way you put it Straight face 😂. Like your videos 🙏🏻. Subscribed.
@demetrioskasabalis553614 күн бұрын
You are a fantastic teacher!!! You have an innate talent of communicating esoteric ideas with such a charisma!!! Congratulations!
@osirusjacky628317 күн бұрын
Thanks so much for taking your time to do this!! Really nice and interesting to hear explanations with passion from a passionate to passionates !
@alithedazzling17 күн бұрын
My pleasure!
@MrBsdninja17 күн бұрын
You are a legend 🙏 thank you for taking the time to make such awesome videos.
@Ananya-lq9vq18 күн бұрын
This channel is gold❤
@datakprosto12318 күн бұрын
Ali! I think you don't understand how much you bring to this world! You are soon good at explaining!
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
Haha thanks!
@samvanzyverden174911 күн бұрын
Thanks Ali. Looking forward to the Fourier transform video. Keep it up!
@paulcoonce249312 күн бұрын
Thank you for that. Much better explanation than they gave me back in engineering school. Actually, I think they taught me that but by the time they crammed everything else into my head, I forgot. And didn't see it as clearly as I do with your teaching skills!
@longbeachboy5715 күн бұрын
Thank you for reminding me how I felt the first time I saw this 35 years ago!!! Awesome!
@DolphinPain11 күн бұрын
I failed precalc back in high school and always had a chip on my shoulder about learning math. I really hope you keep doing lectures past the fourier transform, because you make things so simple to understand.
@subashp792517 күн бұрын
Excellent Sir, I was searching this explanation for many days and got it finally with great clarity, many thanks for your valuable efforts, please keep post videos like this it would be helpful for people forever 🎉
@alithedazzling17 күн бұрын
I'm glad it was helpful!
@antoineaubert940315 күн бұрын
Very well done for your videos. I found them perfect and intuitive. You teach with real example (I love the video with the fingers being hidden to represent the imaginary numbers). You are awesome and keep going.
@alithedazzling15 күн бұрын
Thank you very much!
@mohsinshawkat653114 күн бұрын
Great, Dear Ali. Most videos on this equation focus on the existence of the five constants as a sign of great beauty, but you brought to my attention an issue that seems new to me, which is that the existence of (J) is the cause of the rotational motion. You did something impressive. Thank you very much.
@alithedazzling14 күн бұрын
Well said!
@MohammedImadMahmud18 күн бұрын
Thanks a lot for an excellant explanation. Please continue to do more.
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
More to come!
@bbuild904413 күн бұрын
Thank you, I am a student who tries to get a deeper understanding of maths and physics to answer questions I have that I cant answer now. You are helping me a lot
@WASSIMGAMES10 күн бұрын
absolute cinema dude you're goated frrr
@blizzi193318 күн бұрын
Thank you so much man, love this intuitive explainations, Euler’s eqation really is beutiful
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@gamingjamari68987 күн бұрын
Wow really love the video and the explanation. Keep it up bro.
@arclight460018 күн бұрын
I was waiting for this video! Thanks!
@swizzbeats121218 күн бұрын
Love these videos, takes me back to university :)!
@gavinscoville542415 күн бұрын
I am so exited for the Fourier Transform explanation. 10^2%
@thomaskara239518 күн бұрын
I love your videos, you explain it all so well. Thank you!
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
Glad you like them!
@ursulawestenberger32877 күн бұрын
Thank you! You're just amazing! Please continue! 👋
@alithedazzling7 күн бұрын
More to come!
@OmbarkAmber18 күн бұрын
i just want a teacher like u...in my college for every subject i study...from you i got to know about the Imaginary number (j), (e) and e with power (j.theta) and why the hell it represent cos (theta) + jsin(theta)....thanks man! 👏
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
Glad you're enjoying the explanation!
@OmbarkAmber18 күн бұрын
@alithedazzling yeah...those understandings are very necessary while studying electrical subjects...u know... electrical signals⚡
@sarak857616 күн бұрын
As a high schooler I’m genuinely surprised that you had me interested in math! I can’t understand most things ur saying but I really enjoyed listening to you explain with passion and drive. Im so excited to get to uni so I can study engineering and hopefully start understanding what you’re all about 🤍
@alithedazzling16 күн бұрын
That's the spirit! I'm sure you'll be an amazing engineer.
@Aryanz101_Origial18 күн бұрын
I am from 7th grade and I love your videos and how much in a simple way you explain🤍
@farshaddehqani350216 күн бұрын
Brother you got a gift for teaching. That's rare
@exo-58018 күн бұрын
how many think this channel is so cool? for me it has captured my attention and im really appreciating this man for his intuitive understanding of his audience ,i love it keeep it lit ALI! SO COOL
@alithedazzling17 күн бұрын
Glad you're enjoying the videos!
@bordercut110 күн бұрын
the way he writes infinity is breathtaking.
@mouadtouir651514 күн бұрын
very good explanation , thank you Dr Ali
@CATPLANET2412 күн бұрын
Excellent video! Thank you for this information.
@Yassine-sami-116 күн бұрын
You are providing clarification between the lines keep going please
@anrdhx18 күн бұрын
Great video! You explained everything really well 👏👏👏
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
thank you!
@azeemishaq824013 күн бұрын
I am very excited for the next video
@MIsam-fv9kb18 күн бұрын
Great video thnx for sharing
@enetniss18 күн бұрын
I love these videos! Thank you for taking the time to explain it so clearly. What helped you the most when trying to understand the math for engineering?
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
if something doesn't make sense don't just accept it, keep asking why
@Lumpyspaceranger16 күн бұрын
Really beautiful to see the breakdown of it :)
@alithedazzling16 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@treeross10 күн бұрын
Wow, thanks Ali this is literally a free Calc 2 lesson! Also, you should hang your necklace backwards while you record. It keeps jingling against your mic. If it's against your back we (probably) won't hear it.
@alithedazzling10 күн бұрын
Good point, will keep in mind!
@jaredhouston422312 күн бұрын
I'm always thinking about this identity, in the back of my mind. It's important to our physical world in some way.
@Satiric_cat18 күн бұрын
5:21 You😄 sunvagun... Here, have a thumbs up!
@PaulAnca-k4f15 күн бұрын
An excelent teacher. Please do not stop, up to be PhD also.
@teberer324618 күн бұрын
Its amazing how powerfull taylor series is
@AndyKidd-o4x11 күн бұрын
Great video. I'm always trying to get my (UK) university students to appreciate math, in engineering, where math is primarily a tool. But no less beautiful
@gushubbard764513 күн бұрын
A few observations if I may make so bold: Firstly, the reason that mathematicians prefer e^j.pi + 1 = 0, and see amazing, almost mystical wonder in it, rather than e^j.pi = -1 (which is another form of the statement) is because it involves the five most important numbers in all mathematics. 0 and 1 are the basis of our numeration system (see Peano) and that point is lost in this video. Secondly, the transition from a numerical statement involving only constants (e^j.pi + 1 = 0) to a variable function (e^j.theta etc) involving the variable theta is made without any explanation of what is happening. Thirdly, The idea that 0! = 1 is totally counter-intuitive to most learners and needs some explanation. If 3! = 3x2x1 why should 0! =1? The reason is that mathematicians define it to be 1 to make the system consistent. If n Choose r is n!/r!(n-r)! then n Choose n, which of course must be 1, is n!/n!(n-n)! = n!/n!0! and so 0! must be defined as equal to 1. I have no wish to be rude Ali and applaud what you are doing, but teaching an audience which can give feedback during the session as opposed to comments afterwards, is quite different to giving a lecture, and gives insight to where learners get lost.
@jonhakula824218 күн бұрын
If we make the square root of negative one or i, the imaginary unit, the field that represents the reference frame taking the measurement and place it above the stress energy tensor in Einstein’s field equations (Ruv - 1/2Rguv = 8piG) instead of an expectation value (^) of a probability distribution (from quantum mechanics), doesn’t that solve the measurement problem and quantize the time? The field, which could be called the time, measurement, conscious, or tachyonic field interchangeably is quantized by the reference frame taking the measurement and consciousness and those that have it becomes the metric the universe uses to measure or experience the time. Consciousness is the non-local universe and also the non-local hidden variable or “spooky action at a distance” that is collapsing the wave function of the energy system it is observing. Is this not the only way Einstein’s theories of relativity, quantum field theory based on the standard model of particle physics, evolution by natural selection, and Gödel’s incompleteness theorem can work and be compatible with each other? It is not a theory of everything but a step that has to be taken to understand ourselves better. The act of measurement is the same thing as the universe measuring itself. The tachyon, consciousness, and the imaginary unit all appear to have the same characteristics and relativity becomes the fundamental piece of quantum field theory being the quantization of this field, or time. The reference frame taking the measurement is simultaneously in the past, can anticipate the future, and take measurements in the present to take the time. It is not only there simultaneously but before anything that is moving through spacetime, including photons, making it faster than the speed of light. If you also look at the ‘beginning’ when all of the energy and time in the universe was condensed to a single reference frame, that is where the entanglement of all things happen, and this non-local reference frame (before time) measures itself to create the time. For a tachyon to measure itself or slow down to the speed of light, it would require an infinite amount of energy to do so, creating conditions similar to what we think of as the Big Bang. If this was the case, then everything (all energy) would fall under one wavefunction. Perhaps Euler’s Identity represents a moment in time (e^ipi + 1 =0) that can be derived from Einstein’s field equations through the imaginary unit i. Consciousness would then be something that does not emerge from spacetime but fundamental to it. Gravity becomes the curvature of this particle or energy, which we will call the tachyon, measuring itself and consciousness (the reference frames that have it) becomes the metric that the universe uses to measure or perceive the time. Simply there is no time without consciousness. Even if consciousness was emergent from spacetime, what configuration of particles, made of unconscious ingredients, creates a conscious one? Even if you figured out that a specific configuration of particles creates a conscious experience, how would you be able to verify that? You would have to be the experience itself, no? This relates to Gödel’s incompleteness theorem in which the fundamental truth can only be experienced not described by words or numbers. That which cannot be described by words or numbers is fundamental, it is assumed. Consciousness is fundamental. If consciousness is emergent, how did the universe know to assemble itself together in a specific structure that would inevitably lead to a conscious experience? What is the probability of that? That has to be zero, correct? How can the universe and spacetime work any other way if these theories are correct? The question I have is does this field choose which perspective of itself it wants to experience or is it random?
@DavidAKZ16 күн бұрын
"If consciousness is emergent, how did the universe know to assemble itself together in a specific structure that would inevitably lead to a conscious experience? " - because you are observing it this way.
@EmmanuelMatabaro17 күн бұрын
Amazing! I will check also the sinus and cosinus Taylor formulas
@King_Baldwin_IV_77718 күн бұрын
Amazing explanation mate 👏 🗿.
@jimmypotekev18046 күн бұрын
super helpful! please do a video on the fourier transform
@PaulAnca-k4f15 күн бұрын
From Colombia. congrats!!
@mahdizavvar728813 күн бұрын
you are a good teacher
@ryanwaldt171018 күн бұрын
Great video 👍
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@rpocc13 күн бұрын
Will wait for the Fourier video but I noticed that in this video one counter-intuitive thing is explained via other (possibly even more) counter-intuitive thing because Taylor’s series are good for calculating value of functions with some degree of precision but it completely doesn’t explain what ratio of triangle’s sides has to do with adding powers divided by factorials, so that still looks like magic. In other words, there is still question, what comes first: powers of i or rotation of the θ. I think geometry comes first.
@m_c_865616 күн бұрын
"i"'s curl to the right and "j"s curl to the left
@AhmedIsmail-z4i18 күн бұрын
Please explain the devergence theorem and stokes theorem
@samarbaisoya60818 күн бұрын
Brother love your video❤ Please also explain more about taylor series and about how that sin and cos come 15:04
@matthewsheeran15 күн бұрын
Question I have is how many possible proofs of Euler's equation are there? My engineers gut tells me they will be few and far between and will likely map to and look similar to the Taylor series above, even if they are from out of another branch of mathematics. It aint calculus but there ain't no substitute for intuition as it sure sounds to me like Euler himself just found it just through fiddling and intuition!
@syn214218 күн бұрын
This is so cool Ali! Do you know if Euler actually gained his insight for his formula by playing with the Taylor series?
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
It's impossible to know for sure, but to me this is the only way you can mathematically derive in way that makes intuitive sense -- so I will vote with a strong yes
@franciscodanconia4518 күн бұрын
It was a different Era…
@JRoadzReegz18 күн бұрын
Just chilling in st peterberg checking out some Taylor serifties
@aniketpachaury18 күн бұрын
I understand this video and the previous one too, but why is e used so ubiquitously in other equations where we need an exponential, but are not concerned about oscillatory behaviour or the rate of change of the exponent? For example, in semiconductor physics, we can equate the carrier concentration at one point in space to another point in space by e^(the potential difference / thermal voltage). If carrier concentration is exponentially dependent upon potential, why does the exponent need to be e, and not any other constant like 2 or 3?
@michaelcolby363218 күн бұрын
Great video 👍🏼, would you ever consider creating a video regarding internships for college engineering students (electrical and mechanical)? Thankyou.
@theuselessman6942018 күн бұрын
no way I wanted to learn how this worked for 6 months and this videou poped up my man really explained it in a way my monkey brain could understand I only had a proplem with how sinus and cosinus taylor extensions other than that even a high school student can somewhat understand
@246fara3 күн бұрын
Thanks for the wonderful videos Still wondering how intuitively connect exponential phenomenon to the periodic one. Some visual and intuitive examples Thanks again
@biswambarpanda446818 күн бұрын
Long live sir.
@omaro701517 күн бұрын
Can you do continous Convolution or Fourier Series?
@Original_Moi17 күн бұрын
love the explainations, could you do one on the Taylor Series to begin with?
@cay148416 күн бұрын
I don't know if here is the correct spot to ask that but I don't know any explatory physics channel so here I am. My question is about electrical potential energy, in my physics book it says "when opposed 'q's gets closer the energy lessens and if they move away the energy increases" well my understanding of this is if you get two opposed particuls which pushes each other and pull them apart more they should push more and more till infinite but in infinite they don't have any force on each other. I thought about in (EP= k. q.-q/d) the - meant the pushing for event instead of pulling but if we give + to pull and - to push isn't that vectorial but electrical potential energy is skaler... That's all I'm not sure I expressed myself correctly but I hope someone has an answer for me
@scathingpoo247718 күн бұрын
The derivation is cool but doesn’t really explain why exponentials are relating to cyclical in different spaces.
@EVERYTHING_XYZ123415 күн бұрын
Sir can you pls ans my qn ... If we calculate the divergence of vector r/r³ then it's zero ..but if we draw then we will see that there are outward facing vector fields present and where divergence can't be zero... Pls tell me if you can.. or make a video
@DuckForPope18 күн бұрын
From one Ali to another, thank you so much for these enlightening videos. - Ali the unremarkable
@alithedazzling18 күн бұрын
Haha glad you enjoyed it!
@quinn-bg3ok17 күн бұрын
maybe do fourier series before fourier transform
@datakprosto12318 күн бұрын
I really though that Taylor series was invented by Taylor Swift (since i dont know the guys full name), till you said it was a joke. Thanks for clarifying)
@abdulazizmisheal888318 күн бұрын
The problem for electrical engineering students they don’t take a course for complex math which lead to a big problems of understanding there courses
@unes830717 күн бұрын
But complex maths is supposed to be taught in high school around grade 11 and 12, at least this how it's going in Morocco
@abhishekgrover-pv1ic18 күн бұрын
Nice explanation
@anissbenthami18 күн бұрын
Can you do trigonometric functions?
@eofirdavid17 күн бұрын
While this is one of the proofs for Euler identity, it is just a technical way of reaching it, and I don't think it gives the real intuition behind it. The main idea behind the identity, is that you want to convert movement over the circle (which is 1-dimensional) into the position on the (2-dimension) plane. We have very simple ways of modeling these two systems: for the circle we can just measure the angles, and advancing by some angle is done by addition. For the plane, we have the incredible complex numbers, where rotation is done by multiplication (by numbers of length 1). So basically, you are looking for a function that converts addition into multiplication, and in a sense, the only such functions are exponents. By the way, here the basis of the exponent is e^i, but you can choose other bases to get other "rotations" that look more spiral like. In any case, while the Taylor series is an important tool to study such functions, the main interesting property of exponents that make them so important here, is their ability to convert addition to multiplication, namely e^(x+y) = e^x e^y.
@LucharPS18 күн бұрын
Excellent!
@nishan37517 күн бұрын
Great video. Could you explain how the Taylor series was derived.
@sergek694316 күн бұрын
Wonderful. Thank you
@azeemishaq824013 күн бұрын
Great job keep it up
@diegohernandez810413 сағат бұрын
could you make a video about taylor series? where do they come from? your explanations are amazing and very easy to understand
@marcosfernandezsoler26812 күн бұрын
Fucking mindblowing. Cant believe it. I love learning math. Thank you for sharing it.