Evaluating direct transcription and nonlinear optimization methods for robot motion planning

  Рет қаралды 468

ADRLabETH

ADRLabETH

9 жыл бұрын

The video presents hardware experiments on motion planning for the the ballbot Rezero using direct transcription.
Related Publication:
Diego Pardo, Lukas Möller, Michael Neunert, Alexander W. Winkler, Jonas Buchli
Evaluating direct transcription and nonlinear optimization methods for robot motion planning
Full paper available at:
arxiv.org/abs/1504.05803
Abstract:
This paper studies existing direct transcriptionmethods for trajectory optimization for robot motion planning.These methods have demonstrated to be favorable for planningdynamically feasible motions for high dimensional robots withcomplex dynamics. However, an important disadvantage is theaugmented size and complexity of the associated multivariatenonlinear programming problem (NLP). Due to this complexity,preliminary results suggest that these methods are not suitablefor performing the motion planning for high degree of freedom(DOF) robots online. Furthermore, there is insufficient evidenceabout the successful use of these approaches on real robots. Togain deeper insight into the performance of trajectory optimiza-tion methods, we analyze the influence of the choice of differenttranscription techniques as well as NLP solvers on the run time.There are different alternatives for the problem transcription,mainly determined by the selection of the integration rule.In this study these alternatives are evaluated with a focuson robotics, measuring the performance of the methods interms of computational time, quality of the solution, sensitivityto open parameters (i.e., number of discretization nodes andvariables initialization) and complexity of the problem (e.g.number of constraints, state and action bounds). Additionally,we compare two optimization methodologies, namely SequentialQuadratic Programming (SQP) and Interior Point Methods(IPM), which are used to solve the transcribed problem. Asa performance measure as well as a verification of usingtrajectory optimization on real robots, we are presentinghardware experiments performed on an underactuated, non-minimal-phase, ball-balancing robot with a 10 dimensional statespace and 3 dimensional input space. The benchmark taskssolved with the real robot take into account path constraintsand action bounds. These experiments constitute one of veryfew examples of full-state trajectory optimization applied toreal hardware.

Пікірлер
Reveal Invisible Motion With This Clever Video Trick
14:20
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 2,6 МЛН
OMG🤪 #tiktok #shorts #potapova_blog
00:50
Potapova_blog
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
He sees meat everywhere 😄🥩
00:11
AngLova
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Fast Trajectory Optimization using Vertex-Based ZMP Constraints
3:45
I Made a Neural Network with just Redstone!
17:23
mattbatwings
Рет қаралды 682 М.
Model Predictive Control
12:13
Steve Brunton
Рет қаралды 248 М.
Introduction to Trajectory Optimization
46:40
Matthew Kelly
Рет қаралды 87 М.
But what is a neural network? | Chapter 1, Deep learning
18:40
3Blue1Brown
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
The Pythagorean Siphon Inside Your Washing Machine
11:31
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
#miniphone
0:16
Miniphone
Рет қаралды 3,7 МЛН
Best mobile of all time💥🗿 [Troll Face]
0:24
Special SHNTY 2.0
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
ПОКУПКА ТЕЛЕФОНА С АВИТО?🤭
1:00
Корнеич
Рет қаралды 3,4 МЛН
Спутниковый телефон #обзор #товары
0:35
Product show
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН