Comment down below what series of airplanes you'd like me to cover next!
@jjthejetplane116 ай бұрын
'The 172's outline remains largely the same' except for the fact that modern models of 172 look COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from the first production 172s
@Walkercolt16 ай бұрын
Nearly 60 years ago I took flying lesson from "J. G." who owned a Cessna 195 with the BIG 375(?) or 425 HP 9 jug P&W radial. All metal, lovely braced high-wing, BIG (5 passengers or 6 skydivers). I was training in an ErCoupe (1946 or 47-75 HP and two-speed prop). I tried the big 185 ONCE. Move the throttle and pitch forward and you were AIRBORNE and climbing like a rocket! The heavy 185 was beyond my landing skills!!! I couldn't "flare-out" like the tiny ErCoupe. Couldn't ignore the torque and P-factor of that big radial. Full instrumentation and 80-90% aerobatic. A "REAL" airplane! She'd climb to 10,000 ft. with five skydivers for delayed (90-120 seconds) opening jumps, in under 15 minutes-I think I remember J.G. used 60% throttle-about 160 knots.
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
That’s awesome thanks for sharing, hopefully I get a chance to fly the 190/195 someday :)
@goldenstateaviation28616 ай бұрын
I saw a 195 at a local airfield four years ago. After doing lots of research it’s my dream plane.
@aircraftadventures-vids6 ай бұрын
From someone learning the youtube ropes myself, big congrats on this video, and I could easily see there turning into a series (all Beech planes, all piper aircraft, etc etc). You got something going here.
@chesterfield57046 ай бұрын
I hope so!
@danweyant49094 ай бұрын
Very well done. Don't care what the critics say. Good presentation and pace. Thank you.
@Steeyuv6 ай бұрын
You can find 150s with after-market tailwheel conversions as well. They’re small and slow, but even as a helicopter pilot, I found them to be absolutely huge fun for doing farm-strip flying.
@ericbuist82185 ай бұрын
I really liked this video. My uncle has a 172 and to people that don't know anything about them I've often described it as being "like the Toyota Camry of airplanes" so that's funny you made the same comparison.
@Lifewithdorothyw6 ай бұрын
Fantastic overview! Really appreciate the clear and detailed breakdown of each Cessna model. It’s great to see both the historical context and the evolution of the designs. Thanks for making it so accessible and engaging for both aviation enthusiasts and newcomers alike!
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@MalcolmRuthven5 ай бұрын
The first 210 wing had struts. contrary to what this video says. It introduced the cantilever wing (no struts) in 1967. It offered a turbocharged version starting in 1966.
@jimml19386 ай бұрын
Clyde Cessna crashed at least 13 times mostly in planes he built and repaired while trying to teach himself to fly. He was an early proponent of a mono-wing cantilevered wing while others stuck with biplanes, The Cessna company (after Clyde had retired) eventually used strutted wings on models to lower manufacturing costs. All their high wing cantilevered designs all look great, IMHO.
@MikeDCWeld6 ай бұрын
Most pilots only get to crash once.
@atlascheethac78696 ай бұрын
Dont forget about the South African modified 402s called the Cessna falcon, where they removed the two reciprocating engines for a turbine. ZU-PKC is one of them.
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
Wow! I actually didn't know about that, thanks for sharing!
@wiliam75705 ай бұрын
I have been flying my Cessna 170B for the past nine-years and enjoying every minute of it. It burns about 7.1 GPH leaned at cruise. If money was not the issue, then would be picking up a Cessna 185.
@shugoesflying5 ай бұрын
That’s amazing, I love Cessnas line of taildraggers but haven’t had the chance to fly in one. I’ve only flown citabrias and decathlons so far.
@johnnywang97656 ай бұрын
Wow I didn't know there are so many planes! This is very informative; thank you for putting this together. Much needed by the community!
@travelwithDorothy2 ай бұрын
Great Video!
@martygenska81174 ай бұрын
Interesting, but wish you presented this in chronological order; you were all over the map here.
@asher98276 ай бұрын
This was very well made, I like the idea of having a short synopsis of the variants from the manufacturer, maybe next you should do beechcraft and piper because those 2 are what alot of us pilots came up training on 👍
@ihategrigris6 ай бұрын
This was great! Thanks. I hope you make more videos in this style.
@n539rv6 ай бұрын
Starting with the 172… seriously? What about the 120, 140, 170… the real meat and potatoes behind the 172 & 182.
@Equinox0486 ай бұрын
You tell him
@MarEpor6 ай бұрын
though informative, this video should have gone in historical order 😬
@massmike116 ай бұрын
152
@mattedwards77885 ай бұрын
Make your own vid then
@danweyant49094 ай бұрын
I don't know, why not? Just state the relevant facts on the obvious model and move on to the list.
@andreasw99075 ай бұрын
Well explained lots of cool Insight :)
@wackaircaftmechanic23126 ай бұрын
It’s a beautiful machine too! One cool thing about the 177 is it’s easier for paraplegics to get into aviation because of the wider doors and rudder modifications.
@finnboru79776 ай бұрын
152s are also certified for limited aerobatics compared to the 150, most prominently intentional spins
@PJHEATERMAN6 ай бұрын
The model is the Aerobat. I had one converted to a tail dragger and 180 hp with long range tanks.
@deancook68326 ай бұрын
There was also a 195hp version of the 172 that was called the Hawk XP.
@kamekaze9976 ай бұрын
🔥🔥🔥 second to what @aircraftadventures-vids said, a series like this would kick ass 🔥🔥🔥
@connormclernon266 ай бұрын
I’ve flown… 150, 152, 162, 172, 182, 182RG so far in my time as a pilot
@semaex6 ай бұрын
Good explanation, but the order of presentation is weird.... either make it chronologically or by size. This was all really mixed up.
@brianb.23986 ай бұрын
I own a 1984 182R, I love it!
@kazflight6 ай бұрын
What a fun video! Great job!
@MikePlaysYeet6 ай бұрын
Would love if you made an episode about the different 172 models, like the c172r, c172s, c172 j-ta etc
@FLracing185 ай бұрын
This video was amazing but those car references tho
@Littleislandvibe6 ай бұрын
Very informative!
@DaytonaRoadster6 ай бұрын
4:47 ooohhhh i do like that. Didnt know they had anything still flying with radial engines besides warbirds
@gordongunn90456 ай бұрын
Awesome!! Thank you.
@VOLK________6 ай бұрын
This is great
@MRYOUNG1234515 ай бұрын
The 170A model the first production run had fabric wings the B model went into production with all metal wings
@New2Me170B4 ай бұрын
The 170 has fabric wings, the 170A has metal wings with traditional flaps, the 170b has metal wings with large fowler flaps.
@michaelhoffmann28916 ай бұрын
Over 40,000+ C172 built - and sometimes I think think we had all of them at my flight school and I flew them all. 😆
@Carsonf166 ай бұрын
Great video
@bladi-senpai93986 ай бұрын
very very nice made video, but i got really lost going back and forth on the timeline
@LeonFelixRusso6 ай бұрын
Excellent!
@jasonjjyt5 ай бұрын
I believe you did not mention the C182RG which features Retractable landing gear!
@KitYeeScott6 ай бұрын
The C-185 was introduced with a IO-470 producing 260HP, the 300Hp Camera later.
@braveworld27074 ай бұрын
My favourite Cessna to fly was the C177b and would loved to have flown the C177RG for the extra speed and it may have edged out the C210. For load and speed it was the C210 and for flying jumpers it was the C205 because the exit was nice and close to me at the front. I nearly wheelbarrowed the landing the first time I flew one when I ran out of elevator authority during the round out and flare. 🤦♂The CoG moved forward a bit when the seats were removed and an extra 5kts resolved that. The C206 was the better to fly with _lawn darts_ however it had the exit at the right rear which was harder to get out of if 💩 hit the fan (as in the canopy hit the tailplane). 😲 Was disappointed I never got to fly the C208 but my personal 💩then hit the fan. 😭 If you do one on Pipers then I shall definitely Subscribe. Least favourite aircraft I flew was a Bitchcraft A36. It was nice to fly but I found the seat didn't agree with me and found it very uncomfortable. Wish I'd had a chance to fly a different model though. I hope you find time to run through the Piper line up. 👍 *Thank You* for the video.
@ImpendingJoker6 ай бұрын
You missed one. The Cessna 172RG Cutlass.
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
I lumped all the 172s together, otherwise the video would be 50 minutes long lol
@RCB7576 ай бұрын
And the R-172K Hawk XP. 195 HP and a Constant Speed Prop from the factory. (C-182 Lite)
@jkorshak6 ай бұрын
Nice overview. Shots of the "marketing department" having a meeting and sound effects every time there's a graphical change are tedious and distracting. Otherwise, decent presentation. Thanks.
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
Thanks! And I genuinely appreciate the feedback as that’s what allows me to get better.
@christianjensen55236 ай бұрын
Agreed.
@Παν-σ1ω5 ай бұрын
All I want for christmas
@avgeek_20146 ай бұрын
U forgot the Cessna 208 Edit: Nevermind, I saw it
@Conn6536 ай бұрын
You did give wrong information about the 210. The 1960 model(first year) was a fast-back(no rear window), swept tail, retractable gear and wing struts. The 1967 model first introduced the Cantilever wing(no wing struts). They came out 1 year before I soloed in a 150.
@mikeveis30255 ай бұрын
You left out the Cessna Hawk XP and the Cessna Cutlass, the Cessna Cutlass RG, and the Cessna Skylane RG.
@trevormurphy7041Ай бұрын
I actually heard of the military putting weapons on a few I wonder if there’s any pictures I heard they put rockets and everything in the plane would that be trippy
@roypiltdown50836 ай бұрын
disappointed that you left out the T-37 Tweet (or maybe not, as it had two engines?) Still, a snappy little airplane. Nice vid.
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
Thanks! It is a twin engine so not in scope for this video, but I am planning to do a video of all twin piston / jet Cessnas
@roypiltdown50836 ай бұрын
@@shugoesflying coolness - thanks 謝謝
@bbap90795 ай бұрын
what about cessna 206?
@Eatenbyapuma5 ай бұрын
You get that 152 rental price from Rocky Mountain Flight School? I made that website!
@shugoesflying5 ай бұрын
Yeah, woah that’s amazing!
@andyerwin35356 ай бұрын
Thank you. I sure wish cessna would get back into to the affordable trainer market. The new 172 is so out of reach for the average joe
@nunyabidness30756 ай бұрын
There’s really nothing new about it. Even the glass cockpit, which is the doing of an unrelated company, is now 20 years old? The airframe and engine are hardly changed since the 70’s when they decided not to stop making it. Since 1980, Cessna has simply milked the existing market while suppressing competition using their market position.
@pilot_in_commend6 ай бұрын
Brilliant! The whole information about Cessnas is in the same video. This is a good start for those who want to start designating one Cessna from another. Could I please get your permission to translate it into Russian for my audience to spread the word? Of course, I'll add a link to your original video at the very first line of the description and won't monetize my interpretation. I won't do so without your prompt permission. Thanks!
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
Sure!
@pilot_in_commend6 ай бұрын
@@shugoesflying thnx
@pilot_in_commend5 ай бұрын
@@shugoesflying Done! Thank you again! Speaking, do you fly from KPAO?
@shugoesflying5 ай бұрын
@pilot_in_commend yeah I do
@pilot_in_commend5 ай бұрын
@@shugoesflying We have to meet one day - my base is KRHV =)
@PJHEATERMAN6 ай бұрын
Flown a lot of them. Most complex Cessna single i flew was the P-210. He states the 210 was strutless thats false. First models in the early 60's had struts. I believe 67 was the full cantilever wing ,no struts.
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
yeah you're correct! but to go through every iteration of every model of Cessnas this video would be 2 hours long so I pointed out distinguishing features of best known models
@PJHEATERMAN6 ай бұрын
@@shugoesflying Good production, I understand your point. Thank you for the good information.
@aniiraveendran49964 ай бұрын
the landed, space craft is Soyuz
@Demonator1316 ай бұрын
Grest vid but need new mic bro
@Zacolian6 ай бұрын
0:59 I’ve flown in that exact plane. I know the guy who owns it
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
wow what small world!
@DJ997776 ай бұрын
Didn’t realise they had so many failures.
@wolfgagger5 ай бұрын
only the 170 was fabric wings, 170A and 170B had metal wings...
@brokenarrows60926 ай бұрын
When you said planes costing $20,000 was that accounting for inflation? otherwise it’s probably about the same price.
@gerarddip5 ай бұрын
I did flight training for a brief period of my life years ago. The 150 was my least favorite to be trained in, it smelled SO BAD!!! I think some leaded gas must’ve been spilled in there. Plus god knows how much airsickness getting spewed all over the place. Almost single-handily made me reconsider my life path and quit.
@danrhinehart11346 ай бұрын
Now for a fun question to ask the people at Cessna. Why does the 145hp 1934 Cessna Airmaster out preform the new 2024 Cessna 172? It's faster, and carries a little bit better load all on 15 less horse power......
@dustinengel48525 ай бұрын
I thought the controls were stuck the first time I flew a 182 too 😂
@shugoesflying5 ай бұрын
Hahaha glad it wasn’t just me
@youtubeguymike86396 ай бұрын
Not gonna mention the time Cesna mafe the most successful ground attack aircraft of yhe Vietnam war, the Cesna A-37 Super Tweet?
@alan-sk7ky6 ай бұрын
Why not just alternate describing engines as 'Contycoming' and 'Lynental' it's easier to describe such commodity engines thus.
@GLuft36 ай бұрын
Do Piper!!
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
On the todo list!
@chesterfield57046 ай бұрын
80 bucks wet! Currently paying 170 wet for a 172 for 750 nav
@chesterfield57046 ай бұрын
Great video btw
@wdtaut56505 ай бұрын
CG-1, CR-1, CR-2, CR-3
@PepperoniGaming6 ай бұрын
4:07 call the ball
@apennameandthata20176 ай бұрын
Cessna ER and CP series. And NGP
@BenjiBoo426 ай бұрын
Cheap to rent! Uses Rocky Mountains prices 💀💀 No one beats them.
@shugoesflying6 ай бұрын
Hahaha, still cheaper across the board than say a 172
@BaristaKid5 ай бұрын
This video is 7 mins and 52 seconds long -7 =52 =152 =cessna 152
@apennameandthata20176 ай бұрын
182RG
@lexfromthenet38825 ай бұрын
Ummm actually the 152 should be referred to as the Honda civic of the aviation world, being clapped out and cheap and highly produced. 👆🤓
@apennameandthata20176 ай бұрын
C160, C142
@tycflight5 ай бұрын
comparing a 172 to a shitty toyota camry is a shame for all aviators
@Alexander-li4zz6 ай бұрын
This list is incomplete, not chronological and your accent is unbearable to listen to for more than a minute.